boomerslayr9000

[boomerslayr9000]

I know you're not rlly using this account anymore but i just noticed (well... just watched Beastars...) that your pfp was melon. idk just needed to say this

Hello!

Yes, I ADORE Melon! I like him better in the manga, but the way he moves in the anime isnreally interesting to me. Reminds me of a bug

[boomerslayr9000]

Anon: Thank you for your kind words, and I hope the same to you. Even if this account is inactive, I will leave my inbox open and notifs on, so please feel free to use it if you ever need to talk. I hope you're well

[boomerslayr9000]

Please do not involve me further. I am not the "info on Tox guy" or a pedo hunter. Future asks about him will be deleted

I'm sorry, but I don't want to be targeted by him or anyone else again, and I don't want to be using this account regardless, for the sake of my mental health

[boomerslayr9000]

Some anons were asking about the server I mentioned, so I'm reblogging this so y'all can see it. The reader and download are both safe, I verified it myself

HUGE warning for discussions and justifications of real-life zoophilia, discussions of real-life pedophilia, debate about consent, etc., among other things that I've warned for in other posts

(This is NOT about proship stuff, despite the title of the server)

In Light of the deletion of Rogue Won Tons, Please help yourselves to the entire archive of Tox’s MAP server from 2018.

Pro Shipping Haven Server (download)

This file is only readable once uploaded to the Viewer tool at dht.chylex.com

Use the Viewer Here

Uploading the file to the viewer tool allows you to look at an interactive view of the server as it was when last archived in 2018. Lots of images are viewable, and some are upsetting. Much of the discussion in certain channels can be triggering, so please use caution. On this file, Tox is “The Fallout Boy” and his bf is “devot” - I present you this file due to the complete wipe of visual files from my archive.

[boomerslayr9000]

do you have receipts for what jackaltox supposedly did? if you do, i can forward those to the admin of aethy, who is very much anti-abuse & will take his account down

I mean, most of it was public? I had a ton of evidence on my twitter, but it is now locked and abandoned. Honestly though, if you google him, you can see some of what he did, since he's pretty notorious

Also one person here on tumblr posted an interactive archive of his server, where some of the pedo and zoo shit was

[boomerslayr9000]

Btw this blog is kinda dead now. I keep it up just as kind of an archive at this point. Unless I get a notif for an ask or something I won't be using this blog anymore. I am no longer involved in discourse and would prefer not to discuss it with anyone anymore (normal fandom stuff is fine though)

My twitter is also remaining private until further notice. I don't use my twitter anymore except to like my friends' posts basically

My mental health has DRASTICALLY improved since I left twitter, and basically also left tumblr. I'd like to keep it that way

Also I just have so much going on in my life, good and bad, that I don't really have the time or energy to be online, especially if I'd just be getting into more stressful shit thay really doesn't help anyone in the long run

[boomerslayr9000]

hi, I only recently knew about proshipping etc. via twitter and I'm not here often, so I had to ask, what does "FAIA" stand for? I think google redirected me to one of your posts saying you "no longer support the label due to the harassment that follows it" when I was trying to find out what it means, but I'm still curious for an answer!

Tbh, the label hasn't really existed anymore since...early 2021? Nobody really uses it anymore. To be perfectly honest, I haven't even thought about it in a long time, so I don't remember the whole abbreviation (I know the I stands for intersectionality, but I don't remember the rest. Sorry)

[boomerslayr9000]

When you consume problematic fiction you release immoral hormones, um can I get that fact checked

"Please get help bro" only when you provide a proper source to back that up. Also shout out to teenage me, who only consume the most vanilla shit possible.

[boomerslayr9000]

Genuinely, a lot of people on this site (and beyond) seem to have no idea what normalization actually means.

So let me elaborate:

If you see art of a ship that would be illegal/wrong irl, and you immediately know that it would be wrong irl, then it has not been normalized.

If something is normalized, it means that a large majority of people are doing it without a second thought, and the rest of society is okay with it. But you don’t see people publicly announcing on social media that they’re dating/marrying their sibling, or someone way too young (granted, I can’t speak for other non American societies but I do acknowledge that where it is normalized it’s a problem). You know damn well there would be (justified) backlash and therefore it is not normalized.

The disgust toward the very wrong ideas antis claim pro shippers are normalizing has not changed in any significant degree. And it will not change because of pro shippers, because people in fandom are a very small minority of the national population (US) and even more so globally (where there are more people to account for). On top of that, the large majority of pro shippers are aware that those kinds of relationships would not be okay in real life and would attempt to stop/report it if they encountered it.

What an actual normalization attempt would look like would be fundraising and petitioning to make those kinds of relationships legal. But again, this isn’t happening. People are just drawing fictional characters kissing, while again, knowing in the back of their heads that this would not be okay in reality (which is, by the way, a part of consuming media critically, but that’s a whole other beast I don’t want to get into tonight).

TLDR: All of you antis are using the term “normalization” incorrectly and what actual normalization is is not what pro shippers or anyone who ships problematic ships are doing

[boomerslayr9000]

Stop cross tagging

I don't cross-tag. If you mean how I tagged my last post as "anti ship," that's literally what my post was about, meaning the tag was properly used, as I want people to be able to block THAT tag if they don't want to see posts about antis. If you don't wanna see proshippers talking about antis, block the proship tags, which I was also using

Learn how tags work and what they're used for, before demanding that strangers on the internet do something for you

[boomerslayr9000]

I’m an “anti” who recognizes their bias and just really wants to get rid of it. The only real trouble I’m having with undoing my bias is lolisho, and you seem like you could explain it well from your posts. I understand lolishocons are not automatically pedophiles, but I’m having trouble understanding why that is. /gen

Hey there!

So, I'll preface this by saying that I'm NOT a lolishocon/kodocon. Aside from the VERY RARE shota, I am generally uncomfortable with lolisho myself. As such, I can't really speak for anyone but myself (although lolisho fans are free to say their piece in the notes of this post, if they want!)

So, I'm just going to use my interest in Hanako from TBHK as an example, since he's one of the rare shotas I actually enjoy content of. For me, when I see him, I just don't think about him as a "little boy" the way most antis seem to think I would. What comes to mind is not a child, only a cartoon. I find real kids to be extremely gross, and sometimes annoying, on top of just...not at all being interested in them (and am also actually pretty aggressively anti-MAP). I simply like Hanako's design, and his dub voice, a lot. I think he's an interesting character, and enjoy exploring different dynamics and scenarios involving him

Basically, I don't see any resemblence between children, and bug-eyed cartoon characters. My brain sees zero similarities between them, and I find it really odd when other people (especially adults) don't make that same distinction

I will say, though, that I am generally against 3D lolisho, as well as lolisho art that is highly rendered. THAT is when it becomes realistic, and while I won't make assumptions unless the loli/shota actually looks like a real kid, I'm always going to SEVERELY side-eye anyone who seeks out any kind of realism in their lolisho. And if people refer to REAL KIDS as lolis/shotas, I will assume that person is a pedophile hiding behind proship-adjacent labels

[boomerslayr9000]

Shadman isn't a lolicon, he's a pedophile. Just because he calls his subjects "loli" doesn't mean it's loli. Those are real kids. Please do not equate cutesy art of fictional characters to the sexual exploitation of the Very Real children he draws

But, I didn't know Prostasia supported him. I feel this is fairly important, as it means that they support the sexual exploitation of REAL CHILDREN, which they claim to be against. Since this is pretty damning, I think it's important to spread this knowledge in case anyone else missed it the way I did

apologies if this isn't the sort of question you're equipped to answer, but would you mind explaining why prostasia is bad? i don't know much about them, and the closest thing i could find to a decent source was also full of "loli is dangerous" nonsense (and some weirdly petty criticisms of random things their members have said).

I can name a few things.

1. They associate with (and sometimes employ) convicted sexual offenders, most commonly child abusers, yet they claim to support victims. They also associate with James Cantor, a known transphobes who wants to remove trans and nonbinary people from the LGBT+ community, and instead replace them with pedophiles, zoophiles, and necrophiles.

2. I have seen one case where Prostasia aided a child predator in getting a job as a lawyer for child sexual abuse cases. There was an article published by said lawyer, which I’ll have to find again, as I honestly can’t remember exact details at the moment. If I remember correctly, they had pulled some strings to help this person avoid legal repercussions, then paid for his schooling.

3. They have previously advocated for the use of “ethical csem” to prevent offenses. The article where they claimed support of this seems to have been taken down, but they were discussing using images of children who are currently adults (such as baby pictures, or csem that was obtained by victims who escaped the abuse since then), and using images of children “with their consent.” If you mention this to the founder, he claims that by “ethical csem” he was talking about lolisho. This is a lie.

4. The founder himself once attempted to harass me on twitter because I mentioned this stuff on my account. Blocking him prevented the harassment from ever REALLY starting, but I later discovered that he had been name-searching to find my posts (as I frequently talk about Fanexus, an upcoming site that Prostasia gave “legal advice” to regarding child exploitation).

5. One of Prostasia’s associates claimed that teleiophilia (the attraction to adults) was more dangerous than pedophilia, and claimed that pedophiles were the most oppressed minority in western society.

6. Prostasia advocates for introducing minors 14 and younger to the concepts of pedophilia and zoophilia. Not as a safety precaution, but to “educate” them on what those words “actually mean” in an attempt to help minors “discover themselves.” This is a VERY COMMON tactic the MAP community uses to recruit minors who are queer, mentally ill, neurodivergent, and/or struggling with intrusive thoughts. This is what MAPs commonly do to create AAMs (adult-attracted minors) for their community to groom.

Basically, Prostasia claims to be a research-based csa prevention organization, but it’s all a front. Based on what I’ve seen from THEIR OWN articles and associations, as well as their behavior towards me as a CSA survivor, Prostasia’s real goal is to justify and protect sexual abusers. They are an active danger to children and abuse survivors.

(Update as of 8/20/21)

Prostasia’s founder has been stalking me since at least october 2020 (possibly longer) and block evading to send me vague threats. I had to delete my curiouscat over anons people, including prostasia’s founder, had been sending me

[boomerslayr9000]

Reddit post made by a 43 year old mother about her 14 year old daughter being brainwashed and groomed by an anti and the very real consequences it caused. A depressing but important read that gives insight into how antishipping (like many things) can be used to groom minors.  The post begins with “I (43F) received a phone call” - everything above that is a final update edited in by the OP.

[boomerslayr9000]

I am genuinely curious. Why not tag your post calling out Tox with his current username (Garu****)?

Partially because I don't want him coming after me again, and partially because I forgot to. If he comes up again, I'll try to remember to tag his current username

[boomerslayr9000]

Nothing really new to add, just boosting again since I've seen a rise in interest with Fanexus lately

Reminder: Fanexus is run by not only people who support REAL-LIFE CHILD PREDATORS, they also have at least one on their moderation team

Here is a full archive of Tox's old discord server, as well as a reader to view it with (I know OP is an anti, but I have personally tested the archive and the reader, and it's safe). HEAVY WARNING for real-life pedophilia, beastiality, and defending of such: https://taitalks.tumblr.com/post/642407549831954432/in-light-of-the-deletion-of-rogue-won-tons-please

Please Do Not Join Fanexus

So fanexus is a fandom platform that is currently in beta. They bill themselves as an anti-censorship, pro fandom social media site that caters to fandom creators:

This may seem harmless on the surface of things, but if you’re thinking of joining this site, please reconsider. They partnered with prostasia, a so-called pro-MAP “child advocacy” organization that employs a convicted pedophile and supports (CW CSA) the use of child modeled sex dolls. Prostasia also compares pedophiles to the LGBT community and wishes to loosen laws surrounding sexual depictions of children

Here’s James Cantor, a member of the Prostasia Team, saying that we should add a “P” for pedophile to the LGBT acronym

Proof that Cantor is on team Prostasia:

Anyway! Tl;dr: Please steer clear of Fanexus! They’re closely allied with a pro-MAP organization!!!

[boomerslayr9000]

Hey, genuine good faith question here. I used to be in pro-ship Twitter and was a lurker in the Fanexus discord a few years ago, and I noticed a worrying pattern of pedo (I refuse to use the term MAP) sympathizing. A lot of hairs split about ages of consent and mapping fiction into irl to justify it. I'm curious as to your thoughts on why that is?

I was never in the discord server, but I've spoken up A Lot in the past about Fanexus and their defense of pedophiles, especially on twitter. I got harassed really badly because of it (to the point of nearly being hospitalized against my will) so I don't really want to rehash it. If you want my thoughts, please feel free to find them on my twitter (same username)

[boomerslayr9000]

What's your opinion on minors in proship spaces in general? I know a lot of proship people dont want minors interacting and I feel like this pushes kids even further into the arms of antis

I have somewhat mixed feelings on it, but I guess it depends on like...what KIND of proship space the minors are in

For example, minors should absolutely NOT try to enter nsfw proship spaces. Not only is it dangerous for them, but any adults in those spaces (that are FOR ADULTS) could get in legal trouble for interacting with the minor in that space, even if they don't know the person is underage

I also feel a bit iffy about adults and minors discussing certain tropes together. For example, if an adult is discussing age-gap ships with a minor, that tends to be a pretty big red flag to me, even if pornographic content is not being discussed. As a whole, I don't really support adults and minors interacting in proship spaces

What I DO support is minors being proship. I think it's fine for them to post content related to the topic (as long as it's SFW for both safety and legal reasons), and I think they should be allowed to discuss problematic content with people within their age group. But, since most problematic content tends to be kink-related, there are some things that proship minors just shouldn't post in proship spaces that are shared with adults (such as in public)

But, then again, you never know who is lying about their age. So, mostly for minors' safety, I think they should maybe keep discussion of certain tropes private, and only with people their age that they know offline

TLDR: My feelings are extremely mixed. I support proship minors, I WAS one (before the term existed even), but it's very difficult for minors to navigate proship spaces safely, so I lean towards thinking they should avoid proship spaces online, and instead discuss these topics with other minors who they know in real life