zephyrwrites2

[zephyrwrites2]

"Hey," Jack called softly, "come here a sec."

Mac didn't even glance over, "Kinda busy right now."

"C'mon, c'mere." Jack coaxed.

"Jack, we don't have time for this." Mac practically growled.

"Shut up and get over here."

Mac let out an irritated huff but complied, knowing Jack wouldn't back down. He took the few steps to close the distance between them, and raised an eyebrow pointedly after a beat of just standing there.

Jack took another step forward, getting into Mac's space and slowly lifted his hand.

Mac flinched and took a half-step back.

Jack went completely still, but didn't drop his hand. "Trust me," he said, starting to lift it again.

Mac was stiff as a board, his gaze glued to Jack's hand as it drew ever closer. Finally, the hand settled warm and solid on the back of his neck.

Jack tugged a little bit, bringing Mac closer as he closed the last of the distance between them.

Slowly, incrementally, Mac relaxed. Jack tipped his head forward just a little, just enough to rest his forehead on Mac's...

Mac stiffened further, if that was possible, and turned his head away so that Jack's motion finished against his temple.

"Just breathe," the hand at the back of his neck gave a gentle squeeze and slowly Mac turned his head back, until they stood with their foreheads touching. "There ya go," Jack murmured. "Better?"

After another moment, Mac gave a faint nod.

[zephyrwrites2]

Seam Ripper, Part 2

The fallout of grief.

Jack missed Mac by a matter of hours. That will haunt him forever.

[zephyrwrites2]

Something went wrong in the lab.

It takes mere seconds before Jack comes rushing in with a fire extinguisher and first aid kit.

[zephyrwrites2]

Drugged!Mac/Jack vs Drugged!Jack/Mac

[zephyrwrites2]

[zephyrwrites2]

[zephyrwrites2]

I’m just really curious if there’s any correlation. Also, when I say least fave, you don’t have to dislike the character. I love them all. I just mean the one you might not be as obsessed with.

[zephyrwrites2]

latest days on twitter have been fruitful

tw: fun, people kissing, waywood kissing (scary)

im still a huge pussy abt sharing all this cus what if the haters are gonna get meeee but at the same time idrc

my stance on rpf is if the people involved dgaf (gerard certainly doesnt care and will would like. get a laugh out of this max) and as long as the content stays sfw then theres no issue w having a little bit of fun :3

so yeah thats what i do know

[zephyrwrites2]

Do you ship it?

Reasons: Incest - Age Gap

Consider reblogging for a larger sample size!

[zephyrwrites2]

elon musk is quite literally a neonazi and you draw the line at him being called fat? what sense does that make? if it’s really affecting you then u need to put the phone down, and close the laptop. elon is a BIG bitch! big as a burger!

See what is really fucking eyerolling about this is that it proves that you (anon, and those like you) don't realize why bigotry is bad. You just see the world as consisting of good people who you care about and bad people who are fair game, and bigotry is just a tool that you can deploy against those who are fair game. "They're bad, so it's fine!"

But that's not how it works, fatphobia (and racism, homophobia, transphobia, polyamphobia) are ways of thinking, philosophies through which xphobes understand the world, which live and are reinforced through active practice. When you insult someone for being fat, you are; 1. reinforcing to those around you the social idea/harmful trope that being fat is bad and that you can attack people on that basis, 2. signalling to the fat people around you that on some level you think lesser of them for being fat and, if you decided they deserved it, you might weaponize bigotry against them, and 3. more broadly demonstrating that your stated ideals are an empty shell, because you have demonstrated that you won't stand by them if you think deploying bigoted tropes will give you an advantage.

If you're response to this is "lol why are you taking this so seriously, it's not that deep lmao" then your approach to social justice has more in common with those people complaining about how easily triggered the libs are, than to those who actively want to enact social change whether it is convenient to them or not.

[zephyrwrites2]

i cannot hate myself into a version of me i will love.

[zephyrwrites2]

I don't want my cellphone to have AI I want it to have 3 days of battery time. I don't want my computer to have AI preinstalled I want it to have seven usb ports and high ram at affordable price. I don't want my games to have AI built levels I want them to be so optimized I could run them on a nokia.

[zephyrwrites2]

It’s that time of year. Reblog with how many you’ve heard of.

[zephyrwrites2]

Hi!! 👁 and 🌻 for the ask game? Ty, take care <3

Eye colour -- somewhere between blue and grey (depends on the lighting I think)

Fave flower -- sunflowers

[zephyrwrites2]

The studio that ‘made’ Coca-Cola’s AI Christmas advert apparently produced 85 *minutes* worth of footage of only which 15 seconds were remotely usable.

Those 15 seconds included 10 cuts because everything over 1.5 seconds probably morphed into something horrible. In the ad a bottle changes sizes constantly, vacuous Christmas imagery and some weird uncanny valley faces.

Not posting it because fuck em, but you can go see for yourself if you wish.

Yet more proof that Irn Bru is just better.

[zephyrwrites2]

Really sick of all the suggestions re the recent transmisogynistic policy against Sarah McBride to bring in “buff trans men to use the women’s restroom to make the cis women there/cis men outside feel uncomfortable and see that actual scary masculine men don’t belong in women’s restrooms so they’ll understand why the AGAB-restricted policy needs to be reversed” or for her to use the men’s restroom as a protest and ostentatiously acting like a woman “to make the Republican cis men in there uncomfortable because she’s ‘very visibly presenting as a woman’ so they’ll admit she doesn’t belong in the men’s restroom and will be so uncomfortable they’ll want to reverse the policies and let her use the women’s restroom.”

Like, how do you not realize this still relies on a cissexist/transphobic/binarist/oppositional view of gender, still portrays trans people as genuinely threatening or uncomfortable to cis people in restrooms, implicitly misgenders/denies the equal rights of trans people who don’t “pass” well enough and are less “respectable”/“presentable,” reaffirms the notion that gender non-conformity or the proximity of “the opposite gender”/associated social rituals in gendered spaces is necessarily cringe-inducing/disgusting/repulsive/undesirable, reaffirms the validity of judging people’s right to use the restroom they want to use based on their gendered characteristics instead of just affirming their autonomy, validates cis (gender-conforming) people as the rightful judges of who is/isn’t allowed / as the ones who ultimately deserve to be specially accommodated/who set the standard, erases femme men and butch women (cis or trans) as well as trans people who may want to choose to use the restroom aligning with their AGAB despite appearing visibly nonconforming already for whatever reason (including safety or convenience in some respects), places obligation on and trivializes the danger of trans people putting their bodies on the line in protest (in an undignified and almost exploitative/objectifying way) when we all know full well that Republican cis men and women already don’t actually want trans women or trans men in the same restrooms with them, respectively? We already know they would react with hatred against trans people who use the “right” restroom too. This has played out elsewhere in real life plenty of times before, where trans people trying to comply with such regulations have been questioned, policed, harassed, and kicked out by security anyway.

(And nonbinary people are always forgotten and left out of the conversation completely because of course.)

[zephyrwrites2]

where is the post where someone linked a carrd as a source? i need to see it

Here's the post I was referencing

And here's the actual carrd that it links to

To their credit, they do have plenty of "sources". But so much of it has been debunked, is taken out of context, in bad faith, isolated incidents, etc etc. Not to mention how many licensed professionals disagree with their sentiments

Like. They think that proshippers think fiction does not have any impact on reality at all, when more often than not that's not what we're talking about lol. We just say it's not a 1:1 comparison, or seeing something fucked up on a screen doesn't mean we're automatically going to run out and recreate it in real life.

The carrd has a whole section for how saying "fiction doesn't affect reality" is racist when again, that isn't anything near what we're saying. Yes, representation is important, period. We can all agree on that, right? But how does that equate to thinking everyone who watched Game of Thrones went out and fucked their sibling irl? It's not even apples and oranges at this point it's like apples and toenail clippings

Five hundred million people interact with a piece of media, 499,999,999 people walk away from it and go about their normal lives. But one person claims to use it as inspiration for some fucked up crime in real life, then it's automatically the fault of the media and not the fault of the individual. Make it make sense.