yapoholics-anonymous

[yapoholics-anonymous]

I bring a “I hate gender because it cause serious harm to women and homosexuals” to the table that the tumblr they/thems really dislike.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

"most women don't actually feel anything"

and

"being a woman isn't a feeling or a connection, it is a reality"

this^^^^^

[yapoholics-anonymous]

“Not all men.”

But all of my ex boyfriends.

But my own father when I was 2.

But my uncle.

But boyfriend’s dad.

But two little boys when I was 4.

Thank god you consider yourself different because you do the dishes without asking. I’m liberated. I’m free.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

“Look at this dumbass terf who cant even tell the difference between rape on video and acting. Like I think we would know if the actress was actually being raped for my cnc porn!”

“Woah did you guys know that actress Shelley Duval was actually being tortured while she was playing the role of Wendy from The Shining?? I would have never known, but those tears and exhausted looks were all real!! I thought she was a really good actress but it turns out the director had been abusing her and overworking her to the point of mental break! Isn’t this a fun tidbit of cinema history!”

[yapoholics-anonymous]

Man who claims to be a woman adapting a book about burning a woman alive written by a man who claims to be a woman.

Progress 🤗

[yapoholics-anonymous]

[yapoholics-anonymous]

English speakers have a set of [+ male] predicates for penile activities and what can be done to the penis: father, sire, beget, impregnate, penetrate, ejaculate, castrate, fertilize, deflower, inseminate and emasculate. There is no semantically symmetrical set of predicates for activities performed by or to the clitoris, labia majora or minora. Male perceptions and activities dominate the sex-marked predicates, which is, perhaps, the structural reason they are a fixed set, closed to women. The semantic structure reflects social reality: men take over whatever they like from the women's sphere with impunity. Indeed, they think of such acquisitiveness as their right and prerogative.

Shut out of agency in sex-marked predicates, women must rely on nouns and multisyllabic phrases to describe our experiences. What we have are nominals—clitoridectomy, infibulation, excision, and hysterectomy (since women's genitalia are categorized not as sexual parts of our anatomy but as reproductive "equipment," "plumbing")—or phrases in which the predicate is one of the helping or semantically empty verbs: to get/be aroused, to get/ be excited, to get/be hot, to have an orgasm. But none of those phrases is uniquely [- male]. If anything, they are sex-neutral, and both sexes use them. I would suggest, however, that as women have acknowledged they have sexual feelings and decided they want to talk about them, they have borrowed already available, formerly [+ male] terms. Thus, lacking a female-specific word like ejaculate, women have begun to use the noun orgasm as a verb: "I orgasmed all night."

In fact, a woman's sexual experience and feelings are nonexistent if we believe that the English vocabulary describes reality, because there are no [- male] words for sexuality. There are hundreds of words and phrases for male sexuality and what men do to women; the slang vocabulary of English reflects the male's obsession with his penis and its "'personality." Men even name their penises and talk about them as though they lead an independent existence. Men's obsession with their penises and its structural centrality in PUD is a given, rarely worthy of comment. Men are "supposed" to be obsessed with fucking women. (Men who aren't are deviant.) One can say of a woman, "She's oversexed," but we rarely hear that adjective used to describe a man. Instead, the categorial dichotomy—men have the predicates, women get nouns—again applies. There is a predicate for describing the male activity of fucking lots of women, "womanize," and a noun, "womanizer." A woman obsessed with letting men fuck her is a "nymphomaniac," not a "*mannizer." There is no such [- male] agentive noun; it would be a semantic contradiction because PUD assumes that agency is inherently [+ male]. Womanizer and nymphomaniac both express negative judgments, as Gary Hart, Jimmy Bakker, and Jimmy Swaggert could testify, but unless a womanizing man lives in the public arena, his "weakness" is more likely to be overlooked or tacitly condoned. A woman, however, once branded as a "nymphomaniac," is condemned to a more marginal life than most heterosexuals.

To the best of my knowledge, women have not shown the exaggerated regard for their clitorises men give to their penises. When women talk about their genitals, they say "'down there." Whereas men's genitalia are objects, women's are described as a location. In contrast to the penile vocabulary [- male] words and phrases focus on the place where men stick their penises or the end result of heterosexual coitus for women, having babies. An exception to this is the verb menstruate, which is intransitive (there is no object) and requires a [- male] agent. Other female biological processes, however, can be talked about only as states, as nouns. Women "go through menopause," we "have a climacteric," even though menopause is a process that continues for years, sometimes a decade or more. And, to avoid using the one verb we do have, women have an extensive vocabulary of euphemisms: fall off the roof, be on the rag, Aunt Jane is visiting, red Herbie has come, to be unwell, have a period, be on the mattress, it's that time of the month, and have the monthlies. Women do not act; we have a function: reproduction. PUD describes our lives as nouns, nouns, and more nouns.

-Julia Penelope, Speaking Freely: Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongues

[yapoholics-anonymous]

[yapoholics-anonymous]

"your body does not hate you- patriarch does"

Stop hating your womb and making caricatures of your female anatomy being an angry or evil thing that only wants you to be pregnant or bring you pain and start hating:

• The medical industry for ignoring women’s pain and suffering for generations, not putting the same effort into researching the female body as it does male bodies, often acting as though women are simply small men

• Men in history who mass-slaughtered female medical practitioners and midwives, calling their research into women’s health witchcraft

• Capitalism and a male-orientated workforce and education system that fails to consider and factor women’s needs into it’s demand

• Patriarchal disgust for women’s bodies and their functions

• The sexualisation and shame of female bodies to the point where young women cannot seek help for their issues from caregivers/doctors/parents without fear and embarrassment

Yes, periods are inconvenient and often painful, but before you get frustrated with your body, demonising and blaming it, realise it would not be the way it is if not for a mass-scale medical and scientific negligence of women’s issues. Your body does not hate you- patriarchy does. Aim your energy and efforts there.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

that and "ego motivated femicide"

“Honor Killing” needs to leave our lexicon, it’s the same as “revenge porn”. It should be called what it is: religiously motivated femicide.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

Just a reminder that any religions preaching about forgiveness, mercy, gods light… read the terms and conditions! That shit doesn’t apply to women :

When people tried to defend her:

Christian men love salvation for their sins, they’ll even absolve pedophiles and rapists, but the second an onlyfans girl shows up for redemption, their true nature is revealed.

Im not even being hyperbolic, there’s been multiple instances this last year of onlyfans models trying to rebrand and join the Jesus freak crowd, and Christian men lost their fucking minds. The same men who gleefully allow domestic abusers and sexual predators free clearance into their flock with a warm embrace, shut the door real quick on women whose worst crimes were having sex before marriage

Islam, Christianity, Judaism… all for and by men, not us!

[yapoholics-anonymous]

let her cook

there is a small russian channel that fully mirrors misogynistic memes made by men just by changing one or two words and holy fuck the men are so angry about that.

all of these memes were first created to hate on women, but the owner of this channel called "РНМЭ" just reverses them. this channel had been banned multiple times on the same platforms where the originals were posted without any repercussions from the moderators, but the admins are still going strong more than five years after the original channel was first created.

when the main admin gets a death threat from a male, or even finds a misogynistic comment of his, she sends the screenshots to all of his family members she can find online. sometimes she finds their schools, universities, workplaces. she's cleaning up the internet from this hateful trash all by herself. she doesn't make up anything, she just shows everyone how hateful these men are because people deserve to know the truth about them.

and i love her for this

[yapoholics-anonymous]

[yapoholics-anonymous]

i'm such an "i'm such a girl" opp. please don't demean yourself just because of your gender. really sad we went from "girlpower" and "girlboss" to "i'm just a girl"

[yapoholics-anonymous]

Men masturbate to shit that would be considered an actual fucking crime in literally any other context outside of porn and then act like that has no influence whatsoever on how they view and interact with women.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

this is so sad I don't think i need to add anything

[yapoholics-anonymous]

What happened to "clothes don't have a gender" and why do you need to project all of this bullshit onto your infant baby? Suddenly pink equals girl and blue equals boy again and you call yourself progressive.