yapoholics-anonymous

[yapoholics-anonymous]

proud hater of the 5 love languages.

touch? just being horny

acts of service? being a good partner

quality time? you should already want to spend time with your partner...

words of affirmation? necessary for communication, worthless without follow through and action

gifting? same as words of affirmation, just with jewelry instead of platitudes

The Five Love Languages has cooked our generation. Wow you’re a straight couple and the man’s love language is physical touch (sex) and the woman’s love language is acts of service (waiting on him hand and foot)? Revolutionary.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

he needs to die

[yapoholics-anonymous]

your name is kinda terrifying

Not more terrifying than a man's search history.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

It’s impossible for trans people to be in favor of gender abolition. Their identities are based on traditional gender norms staying the way they are.

Trans women don’t want cis women to stop acting and dressing in a traditionally “feminine” manner. Trans women don’t want cis women to be liberated from the oppression that causes them to spend hours picking out clothes, doing their hair, and putting on makeup.

Because if cis women stopped doing those things, everyone would understand that womanhood is not defined by those things. If cis women stopped doing those things, everyone would see how different trans women are, whose performance of those rituals is the only proof they have of their so-called “innate womanhood”.

It would all fall apart if cis women stopped performing patriarchal femininity.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

they're telling on themselves

"I can't wait to be sexually harassed"?????

[yapoholics-anonymous]

"i 'have' penis repulsion" as a reword for 'being' a lesbian just makes it sound like not liking men is a condition/negative choice instead of a sexuality that isn't a choice.

Yes, you heard that right, lesbians. If you’re not coddling trans-identified males, you’re just a bigot.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

it becomes "more" when men say it is desirable

[yapoholics-anonymous]

sometimes I really do snap myself back into perspective with the realization that I'm a very small fraction of women in the world who have these freedoms in 2024

[yapoholics-anonymous]

if you see a woman driving poorly it’s sexist to assume that it’s because she’s a woman. maybe she’s still learning. maybe she’s doing it on purpose because she’s an asshole. maybe she feels entitled to the road. maybe she’s going to die soon and she had vehicular manslaughter on her bucket list. maybe she has a car crash fetish

[yapoholics-anonymous]

"no transphobia" and "decanter men" in the same sentence is crazy cognitive dissonance.

bringing 4b to mainstream liberal feminists was a mistake that we will see unravel in the next couple of months

We made a huge mistake by introducing 4b movement to these moronic American liberal feminists. I think just encouraging them to separate themselves from the males would have been enough. And gradually we could have introduce them to each aspect of the 6b4t. Now look at them ruining the hard work and sacrifices of South Korean women. I am certain there will come a time when american liberals will take the entire credit for the 4b movement shoving SK women aside just like they did with feminism. We shouldn’t let them do this! We need to take back 4b from them before they take it from us and ruin it.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

I bring a “I hate gender because it cause serious harm to women and homosexuals” to the table that the tumblr they/thems really dislike.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

"most women don't actually feel anything"

and

"being a woman isn't a feeling or a connection, it is a reality"

this^^^^^

[yapoholics-anonymous]

“Not all men.”

But all of my ex boyfriends.

But my own father when I was 2.

But my uncle.

But boyfriend’s dad.

But two little boys when I was 4.

Thank god you consider yourself different because you do the dishes without asking. I’m liberated. I’m free.

[yapoholics-anonymous]

“Look at this dumbass terf who cant even tell the difference between rape on video and acting. Like I think we would know if the actress was actually being raped for my cnc porn!”

“Woah did you guys know that actress Shelley Duval was actually being tortured while she was playing the role of Wendy from The Shining?? I would have never known, but those tears and exhausted looks were all real!! I thought she was a really good actress but it turns out the director had been abusing her and overworking her to the point of mental break! Isn’t this a fun tidbit of cinema history!”

[yapoholics-anonymous]

Man who claims to be a woman adapting a book about burning a woman alive written by a man who claims to be a woman.

Progress 🤗

[yapoholics-anonymous]

[yapoholics-anonymous]

English speakers have a set of [+ male] predicates for penile activities and what can be done to the penis: father, sire, beget, impregnate, penetrate, ejaculate, castrate, fertilize, deflower, inseminate and emasculate. There is no semantically symmetrical set of predicates for activities performed by or to the clitoris, labia majora or minora. Male perceptions and activities dominate the sex-marked predicates, which is, perhaps, the structural reason they are a fixed set, closed to women. The semantic structure reflects social reality: men take over whatever they like from the women's sphere with impunity. Indeed, they think of such acquisitiveness as their right and prerogative.

Shut out of agency in sex-marked predicates, women must rely on nouns and multisyllabic phrases to describe our experiences. What we have are nominals—clitoridectomy, infibulation, excision, and hysterectomy (since women's genitalia are categorized not as sexual parts of our anatomy but as reproductive "equipment," "plumbing")—or phrases in which the predicate is one of the helping or semantically empty verbs: to get/be aroused, to get/ be excited, to get/be hot, to have an orgasm. But none of those phrases is uniquely [- male]. If anything, they are sex-neutral, and both sexes use them. I would suggest, however, that as women have acknowledged they have sexual feelings and decided they want to talk about them, they have borrowed already available, formerly [+ male] terms. Thus, lacking a female-specific word like ejaculate, women have begun to use the noun orgasm as a verb: "I orgasmed all night."

In fact, a woman's sexual experience and feelings are nonexistent if we believe that the English vocabulary describes reality, because there are no [- male] words for sexuality. There are hundreds of words and phrases for male sexuality and what men do to women; the slang vocabulary of English reflects the male's obsession with his penis and its "'personality." Men even name their penises and talk about them as though they lead an independent existence. Men's obsession with their penises and its structural centrality in PUD is a given, rarely worthy of comment. Men are "supposed" to be obsessed with fucking women. (Men who aren't are deviant.) One can say of a woman, "She's oversexed," but we rarely hear that adjective used to describe a man. Instead, the categorial dichotomy—men have the predicates, women get nouns—again applies. There is a predicate for describing the male activity of fucking lots of women, "womanize," and a noun, "womanizer." A woman obsessed with letting men fuck her is a "nymphomaniac," not a "*mannizer." There is no such [- male] agentive noun; it would be a semantic contradiction because PUD assumes that agency is inherently [+ male]. Womanizer and nymphomaniac both express negative judgments, as Gary Hart, Jimmy Bakker, and Jimmy Swaggert could testify, but unless a womanizing man lives in the public arena, his "weakness" is more likely to be overlooked or tacitly condoned. A woman, however, once branded as a "nymphomaniac," is condemned to a more marginal life than most heterosexuals.

To the best of my knowledge, women have not shown the exaggerated regard for their clitorises men give to their penises. When women talk about their genitals, they say "'down there." Whereas men's genitalia are objects, women's are described as a location. In contrast to the penile vocabulary [- male] words and phrases focus on the place where men stick their penises or the end result of heterosexual coitus for women, having babies. An exception to this is the verb menstruate, which is intransitive (there is no object) and requires a [- male] agent. Other female biological processes, however, can be talked about only as states, as nouns. Women "go through menopause," we "have a climacteric," even though menopause is a process that continues for years, sometimes a decade or more. And, to avoid using the one verb we do have, women have an extensive vocabulary of euphemisms: fall off the roof, be on the rag, Aunt Jane is visiting, red Herbie has come, to be unwell, have a period, be on the mattress, it's that time of the month, and have the monthlies. Women do not act; we have a function: reproduction. PUD describes our lives as nouns, nouns, and more nouns.

-Julia Penelope, Speaking Freely: Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongues