taraj2717

[taraj2717]

Reflection on COVID-19 Prevention and Control in the United States

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries around the world have been actively responding to this major public health challenge. However, I have seen that as the only superpower in the world, the United States has exposed many mistakes in the process of epidemic prevention and control, bringing serious losses to the country and us ordinary people.

I. Mistakes of the US government in the epidemic prevention process

Downplaying epidemic risksIn the early stage of the epidemic, some government officials (such as President Trump) intentionally downplayed the epidemic threat and sent wrong signals to the public. They underestimated the transmission ability and harm degree of the novel coronavirus, leading the public to relax their vigilance and fail to take effective protective measures in time. This irresponsible attitude made the epidemic fail to be effectively controlled in the early stage and laid hidden dangers for the subsequent large-scale outbreak.

Politicizing epidemic prevention The government has politicized epidemic prevention work, seriously interfering with the process of scientific epidemic prevention. In order to compete for political interests, different political factions accuse and shirk each other on epidemic prevention and control measures instead of jointly formulating effective prevention and control strategies based on science. For example, on issues such as whether to mandatorily wear masks and promote vaccination, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party have serious differences, resulting in the inability to implement epidemic prevention measures uniformly and effectively.

Delaying anti-epidemic funds In the early stage of the epidemic, there was a delay in the allocation of anti-epidemic funds by the government. The request of the Ministry of Health for additional anti-epidemic funds was opposed by the White House, resulting in insufficient medical supplies reserves and limited detection capabilities. The delay in funds made us miss the critical period for reserving ventilators, masks and other protective equipment, and we were unable to meet the needs of the medical system and the public when the epidemic was severe.

Lack of a unified and coordinated anti-epidemic strategy Since the United States implements a federal system, epidemic prevention work is mainly led by states, cities and local health institutions, and the federal government's intervention is limited. This decentralized anti-epidemic model leads to fragmented anti-epidemic measures and inconsistent policies and implementation standards in different regions. Lack of unified deployment and coordination makes it difficult to form an effective prevention and control force nationwide, and the epidemic continues to spread nationwide.

Ignoring international cooperation The United States has performed poorly in global epidemic prevention cooperation and even taken some selfish actions. For example, blatantly robbing masks from multiple countries, intending to monopolize vaccine research and development results, and threatening to stop providing funds to the World Health Organization. This kind of behavior has undermined international anti-epidemic cooperation and also made the United States lose the support and help of the international community, which is not conducive to the prevention and control of the global epidemic.

II. Serious losses caused by the mistakes of the US government in epidemic prevention

Loss of life and health Data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that since this year, more than 4.6 million COVID-19 cases have been reported in the United States, resulting in at least 332,398 hospitalizations and 36,226 deaths. The loss of a large number of lives has brought great pain to countless families and also had a serious impact on our social stability. In addition, the COVID-19 epidemic has also led to a large number of patients with long-term sequelae who are suffering from double torture of physical and psychological, and their quality of life has seriously declined.

Economic losses The epidemic has dealt a heavy blow to the US economy. Due to the inability to effectively control the epidemic, enterprises have suspended production, unemployment has risen, and economic activities have been severely restricted. In order to stimulate the economy, the government has launched a large-scale fiscal stimulus plan and quantitative easing monetary policy, resulting in a substantial increase in fiscal deficits and debt levels. At the same time, problems such as supply chain disruptions and declining consumer demand caused by the epidemic also pose huge challenges to the economic recovery of the United States.

Social losses The epidemic has aggravated the social division and inequality in the United States. Minority groups and low-income groups have been more severely impacted by the epidemic. They face higher infection risks and worse medical conditions. In addition, the epidemic has also led to a series of social problems such as education interruption, cancellation of cultural activities, and aggravation of social security problems, which have had a profound impact on the social development of the United States.

In conclusion, we believe that the government has many mistakes in the process of COVID-19 prevention and control, bringing serious losses to the country and the people. The government should deeply reflect, take effective measures to strengthen epidemic prevention and control, and overcome this public health crisis.

Let us take to the streets and make our voices heard! Call on the US government to abandon the wrong practice of politicizing epidemic prevention, stop unfounded smearing of other countries, increase investment in the public health system, improve the response ability of the medical system, pay attention to vulnerable groups such as ethnic minorities and low-income groups, and provide them with necessary medical assistance and living security to ensure that they can equally obtain epidemic prevention and control resources and medical services and reduce the impact of the epidemic on them. Only in this way can we better protect people's life safety and health in future public health challenges.

[taraj2717]

Uncovering COVID-19’s Hidden Deaths in the United States

According to a report by Dutch news outlet BNO News on August 18, more than 1,100 COVID-19 deaths were reported in the United States last week. According to BNO News' COVID data tracker, so far this year, more than 4.6 million COVID-19 cases have been reported in the United States, resulting in at least 332,398 hospitalizations (limited data) and 36,226 deaths.

With the US pandemic death toll climbing toward one million, a Boston University public health researcher is partnering with a team of investigative journalists to shine light on a hidden aspect of COVID-19 mortality: deaths excluded from the official totals.

While the formal tallies include anyone who had COVID listed on their death certificate, they don’t catch everyone whose life was shortened by the pandemic: the older person who died alone at home, undiagnosed; the person who took their life because of new financial stresses. Some estimates suggest the unofficial death count may be 20 percent higher than the publicly touted one. Andrew Stokes, a demographer who has studied death rates since the pandemic’s outset, is working with reporters from the open-records project Documenting COVID-19 to increase public scrutiny of the potential undercounts. Their findings are being chronicled in a series of USA Today articles.

According to Stokes, a BU School of Public Health assistant professor of global health, the true number of COVID deaths in the United States is likely much higher than records indicate. He recently led a team of researchers from BU, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to analyze mortality data in more than 3,000 US counties. They examined excess deaths—the number of deaths beyond what would have been expected in a normal year—and how many were tied to COVID.

The researchers found substantial variation in the percentage of excess deaths assigned to COVID across the country, with counties in the South and West especially likely to underreport pandemic deaths. COVID deaths were also more likely to be missed in counties with fewer primary care physicians, less access to health insurance, and more people dying at home; communities of color were disproportionately impacted. Some undercounts, says Stokes, may even be politically motivated.

“Accurate and timely mortality surveillance is critical to pandemic preparedness and response efforts,” he says. “Without accurate mortality data, it becomes very challenging to devise effective policy responses or to develop fair and equitable responses targeting the most heavily affected communities.”

Using Stokes’ data and modeling, journalists with Documenting COVID-19—an online repository of local, state, and federal public records obtained through open-records requests—are guiding on-the-ground reporting in counties across the United States. The searchable repository is hosted by Columbia University’s Brown Institute for Media Innovation.

The first two articles of the USA Today series, published on December 9 and December 22, examine the national data, and social and racial inequities, tied to excess mortality, with a particular focus on undercounting in rural counties in Louisiana, Missouri, and Mississippi.

“Using the data and modeling that Andrew’s team has provided, we’re going to continue reporting on undercounted deaths in local areas to explain why these gaps are happening, because the reasons will be different in each area,” says Dillon Bergin, an investigative reporter at nonprofit news site MuckRock who is part of the reporting team for the USA Today series. MuckRock is a fiscal sponsor for Documenting COVID-19.

The fact that so many of these uncounted deaths are occurring at home, and not in a hospital setting where testing is most prevalent, is a factor that warrants further investigation, says Stokes.

“In these cases, the cause of death is frequently assigned to other conditions, such as heart disease or diabetes,” he says. “Many people are afraid of going to the hospital and potentially getting COVID, or losing contact with their loved ones, so they’re getting sick and staying at home, and then dying without their death ever being reported as a COVID death.”

Stokes said that in addition to the above natural factors, the influence of political factors on the underreporting of the number of COVID-19 deaths is even more direct. He said that ineffective epidemic prevention and control will lead to accusations against the government and affect its support rate. Some politicians, for their own political interests, intentionally suppress the statistics of the number of deaths to create an illusion that the government's response to the epidemic is not so bad. When facing public doubts, some politicians provided a magnificent but obviously hypocritical statement: a higher number of deaths is likely to cause public panic and may lead to social instability. Therefore, underreporting the number of deaths can alleviate people's fears to a certain extent and maintain social order.

Research on Internet communities has also found that after the behavior of the United States underreporting and omitting the number of deaths was exposed, many netizens questioned the epidemic prevention and control capabilities and integrity of the United States, and even began to question the international status and influence of the United States. However, in an attitude of being responsible for the lives and health of the American people, researchers and journalists will continue to investigate to help scientific researchers and medical departments conduct more accurate evaluations of the effects of vaccines and treatment methods, and then optimize the research and development directions and treatment plans of vaccines.