#you're next matt walsh

[quasi-normalcy]

The only redeeming quality to alt-right microcelebrities is the predictable regularity with which they flare out in epic fashion.

[zorubark]

Ben Shapiro: Hi this is the company where we only hire horrible people Candace Owens: ok some years later... Ben Shapiro: You're being horrible, you're fired! How did I hire such a horrible person (the other daily wire cew next to shapiro): Matt Walsh: I'm a pedophile Jeremy Boreing: I think Nick Fuentes is a good speaker Michael Knowles: I like genocide

[duckyfruitbat]

They're at it Again.

Do y'all remember Gamer Gate? I only just learned what all happened in the last year, because at the time I only heard about it in its last days when things were so confused and muddled that I could only gleam the sexism that ran all throughout. Turns out it was a relationship drama that got way out of hand and that whole "ethics in game journalism" part was just a cover. Anita Sarkeesian was just an after thought in the whole thing, yet she has been so thoroughly lambasted by this crowd that you'd be forgiven for thinking that she was the subject. Honestly the timeline is so confusing and disconnected with itself that it is a miracle that Gamer Gate was even a thing, here's and hour long breakdown here if you're curious. If you want ALL the details, here's a six hour long epic here.

OK Ducky, why are you bringing this up, it was ten years ago, we all know how crazy these people are?

Thank you for your input voice in my head. Yes this is old news, but it has been coming up on my feed again. This time with headlines warning about Gamer Gate 2.0, like Heimdall blowing his horn to signal the start of the most pathetic Ragnarok. This time the subject is a company called Sweet Baby Inc. which is a consulting firm according to their website. Specifically consulting about how to represent minority experiences or just sensitive subjects in general. The conspiracy theory is that Sweet Baby has the power to completely change scripts to be more "woke". Yes it is stupid because game developers willingly go to them when they have questions, and they can just ignore any advice from Sweet Baby entirely. Of course it also plays into the culture war that has been boiling away in the meth lab since Gamer Gate initially happened.

Now to get to the real reason I'm bringing this back up, allow me to shove my opinion on this into your brain like a tentacle slithering down your ear canal. I don't think this will take off like the first Gamer Gate at all. Why do I say this? Over the past year alone we've been seeing the kind of people who would jump on this train making complete fools of themselves any chance they get. Remember the Star Field pronouns guy? This is just going to be more of that, and it will be largely ignored with the exception of a few public meltdowns. There's also the fact that this one would be built on even shakier ground than the first one. In order for Sweet Baby to be involved in a video game the developer needs to make contact first. In a series of interviews with The Verge, team members of Sweet Baby repeatedly say how they are just there to consult the writers, who already wrote in minority characters. That's just how a business like this works, the "woke" content would have found its way into the game to begin with. The difference being the slightly higher possibility of misrepresentation.

Needless to say, if this blows up within the next week, it's safe to say that this wave will be a laughing stock. As I'm writing this, the cracks are already forming. Maybe you saw that Matt Walsh from the Daily Wire has already given his two cents on the situation on the side of Gamer Gate. Here's the thing though, there are clips floating around of Walsh actively bashing gamers for playing video games as adults. He got some backlash from his own audience. The targets of this wave even have a support group in the victims of the first Gamer Gate. This time the defense prepared, and the offense seems far less prepared than last time.

[papirouge]

God I love JKR so much.

Matt Walsh has literally repeated how much he’s a christian nationalist (so he’s not a true Christian) and has spoken about how minors are “most fertile” and how he had thought about his own son raping his daughter and he would first worry over his son being labeled a sex offender. This man will be the next Crowder, with his wife wisening up to leave him and he’ll then next crusade against divorce. These weak trad larping men ARE NOT against the trans agenda. They’re only contrarians. If trans women were all anti feminists and conservatives, men like Matt would openly embrace them. Women like JKR stand up for women unapologetically

You're absolutely right. Those men aren't against the trans agenda : they hate anything remotely gender non conforming. If trans pepe didn't exist, they'd bully effeminate (gay) men and butch instead. Trans are just a more easier target (because they are much more visible and therefore hugely antagonizable).

People like him are precisely why trans people do exist, because they shame people into gender conformity. In a sense, trans people are paradoxically very gender conforming though: they think that because they don't have interest or tastes "socially accepted" they have to be of the opposite sex. So while they think they're gender conforming (transwomen think they're women so it's "normal" to them to wear women's clothing) they're actually gender non conforming for normies (transwomen are still considered as men by most people so they are seen as transvestites).

Joanne is very smart for not falling into this trap and fake benevolence of those Conservative men who don't have any remote respect for women (beside pickme fawning over the ground they walk on). She probably remember they were the ones clowning her as a big bad leftie just because she canonized some of her characters as gays or Black...

If only radfem could have such a good discernment. I'll never forget how hard they whiteknighted for that scrote nest that is Kiwifarm just because it was beefing with one trans YouTuber.... One of their biggest L so far.

[talkingpointsusa]

Walshed Up: December 5th, 2023

We are going back to our roots today, and those roots are talking about how ridiculous Matt Walsh is. For those who do not remember, our first blog post here at Wired was about how a lot of the arguments that one-time shock jock and now full-time transphobic propagandist Matt Walsh don't hold up when you look at them critically.

People are also talking about Matt because of a disgusting comment he made on Monday's show about surrogacy and gay couples. We might talk about that at some point either this or next week, but I'm not in the mood to engage with homophobic and bigoted garbage today.

So, Matt's focus on Tuesday was about the UN Climate Summit and how it is all about world leaders "plotting to destroy civilization".

Trigger Warning: Since this is a Matt Walsh episode and Matt is a guy who thinks about transgender people more than most transgender people, there is obviously some transphobia in this episode. If you're not comfortable with that, that is completely ok. If your still interested in the climate stuff, I'll put another warning before Matt goes on his transphobic rant of the day. However this is mostly the "Matt Walsh knows nothing about climate change episode" so I really recommend you stick around for that because it really shows how ignorant this guy is. If it isn't abundantly clear, the opinions expressed by Matt Walsh are not the opinions of me AT ALL.

This is probably true, it's not like Matt Walsh has a streak of being insanely overdramatic and declaring that every single thing he does not like is a precursor to the destruction of human civilization. (Image via Matt Walsh at the Daily Wire)

2:28: "It's common knowledge at this point that pretty much every prediction that's been made by climate activists has turned out to be completely false"

This is coming from a guy who regularly predicts that letting transgender people have rights will lead to the total collapse of society.

Also, studies show that climate models up to 50 years old accurately predicted the situation that we are in today. This shows that the argument that Matt makes later that long-term predictions of the climate are just a trick to lie to you is complete bunk.

2:55: "And there are a lot of examples of this phenomenon, there's Leonard Nimoy AKA Mr Spock claiming in a 1978 television special that 'During the lifetime of our grandchildren, arctic cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the inhabitable portions of our planet into a polar desert'."

Ah yes, a 1970's (which might I add, was before climate change was EVEN ON THE PUBLICS RADAR, making this completely irrelevant) TV special starring world renowned climatologist....Leonard Nimoy? Because that's a fitting representation of hundreds of academic studies that say that climate change is a serious threat to humanity.

Hard hitting stuff Matt, hard hitting stuff.

3:27: "Then there was that infamous 1989 article from the Associated Press citing a senior UN environmental official saying that quote 'Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000'."

I looked into this article, and surprise, surprise, Matt isn't telling the entire story.

First of all, the senior official was Noel Brown, who was the director of the U.N. Environment Program. Noel Brown was an environmental diplomat and not a climate scientist, so Matt is still not citing a study from a legitimate scientist.

Second of all, the Associated Press left out a key detail, presumably to make a better headline. What the statement actually said was that nations would be under water in some time in the near future (some of the studies cited go all the way up to 2100) if the global warming trend isn't reversed by the year 2000.

So, essentially, Matt is misrepresenting this article while still not providing an actual scientist making an incorrect claim about climate change.

3:49: "A NASA scientist did the same thing in 2006 when he told NBC News that quote 'The world has a ten year window of opportunity to take decisive action on global warming and avert catastrophe'."

Ah finally, an actual climatologist.

The scientist here is James Hansen, a very well known climate researcher. I read the article and Hansen isn't saying that we're all going to die if climate change isn't addressed in that ten year window.

He's actually saying something similar to what Noel was saying, namely that there would be serious long term consequences if we don't address the climate crisis.

And given the multiple instances of extreme weather and climate we have seen recently, he was actually right.

4:01: "More recently of course, Greta Thunberg got in on the action in 2018 when she claimed that quote 'A top climate scientist is warning that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years'."

Greta Thunberg did indeed say that; however, the top climate scientist she was citing never said the world would end by 2023.

The person in question is James Anderson, a professor of atmospheric science at Harvard University. Anderson was talking about the need to curb climate change over the next five years.

The actual quote was this:

"People have the misapprehension that we can recover from this state just by reducing carbon emissions, Anderson said in an appearance at the University of Chicago. Recovery is all but impossible, he argued, without a World War II-style transformation of industry—an acceleration of the effort to halt carbon pollution and remove it from the atmosphere, and a new effort to reflect sunlight away from the earth's poles. This has to be done, Anderson added, within the next five years."

Anderson also later stated that the claims of extinction were "a complete fabrication of what I said."

Greta Thunberg most likely misread or misinterpreted what James was saying and made an admittedly hasty tweet. That is probably also why she later deleted it.

See a theme here? All four points Matt Walsh has brought up are either half-truths, irrelevant, or a complete distortion of the actual source material he is bringing up.

This is not only remarkably poor journalism but is also, as third-banana Michael Knowles would say, weak sauce.

4:18: "Reality disproved all of them"

This statement, but for Matt's arguments.

4:23: "Most cultists are smart enough to design their claims so that they sound highly alarming at the time and then by the time that you can validate those claims years later, most people have forgotten about the whole thing"

I would normally skip over this to get to actual arguments of substance; however, I find it interesting how this statement also applies to Matt Walsh and the rest of the Daily Wire.

How about when he got onto his show on May 23rd and declared that "diversity is an anti-white conspiracy"?

What about in our first blog post, where we got to witness Matt declaring accepting trans people as "cultural suicide"?

If making highly alarming claims about the future of society is "cultish behavior," then Matt Walsh is the cult leader.

5:20: "Now, we've already established in the past that it was never going to be true that it's the hottest year on record, that's an absurd claim. What they've actually said is that it's the hottest year period for the planet Earth which, even if that was true there would be no possible way to verify that because we don't have records of what the temperature was on a daily basis going back thousands and millions of years."

There aren't records but scientists do have ways of estimating what the temperature was in a certain region during a certain time period.

The main way that scientists estimate ancient climate is through oxygen isotopes. Oxygen isotopes come in heavy and light varieties. The heavy variety is called O-18 and the light variety is called O-16. The thing that distinguishes a lighter isotope and a heavier one is the number of neutrons. O-16 has 8 neutrons and O-18 has 10 neutrons.

Climate factors in certain regions will impact the number of heavier and lighter oxygen isotopes that scientists find in glaciers. When the Earth is cooler, lighter molecules evaporate more; when it's hotter, heavier ones also evaporate.

Scientists use water trapped in glaciers to measure past temperatures.

I'm not a climatologist and it is way more advanced than what I just said. But my point is that there are ways to figure out the temperature in the past so Matt's argument here is based on the false premise that there is absolutely no way of knowing what the temperature in a region was like years ago?

And by the way, "on record" means that it is the hottest year in the years that can be recorded, not all of human history! Otherwise they would say "the hottest year in human history".

5:58: "None of these articles will mention the recent volcanic eruption in the Pacific Ocean, which we've talked about, that blasted a huge plume of water vapor into the atmosphere, how that likely trapped heat and raised the global temperatures"

What Matt is talking about here is the Tonga Undersea volcanic eruption that climaxed on January 15th of 2022, which did indeed release massive amounts of water vapor into the atmosphere. On the surface Matt is correct, this very well could have contributed to the increased temperature.

What Matt is leaving out is the trend towards higher temperatures that have been caused by climate change. According to NASA, the last five July's have been the five hottest July's since 1880. Unless there has been an undersea volcano eruption every year for the past five years, this argument does nothing to disprove climate change.

6:12: "And what's funny about this premise is that if we accept it as completely true for the sake of argument that humans caused all this, than humans must be responsible for the extremely cold temperatures that are also being recorded this year."

Congratulations Matt, you've figured out climate change! Let's end the episode here and never speak of the remarkably embarrassing arguments beforehand again.

6:23: "In some cases we're being, record cold temperatures"

I love how Matt seems to think this is some kind of gotcha when in reality all it does is further prove that climate change is a reality. Why are we experiencing record cold temperatures? Almost sounds like the climate is a changin'!

6:54: "Now most of central and eastern Europe was like that last week. They have never seen snow like this in recorded history. This is supposedly the hottest year ever recorded and they are experiencing record snowfall"

Matt is confusing weather and climate here. Here is the difference.

Weather refers to short-term changes in the atmosphere whereas climate describes what weather is like over an extended period in specific areas.

When people say it is the "hottest year on record" they are referring to the global average temperatures, climate. This average is calculated using climate data collected from a variety of meteorological sources, for example weather stations.

Also, climate change is a cause of extreme cold so this still does not disprove climate change.

7:08: "But it gets better, because if you want decisive proof that irony is still alive despite every effort by the left to quash it forever here it is; the snow was so bad last week that in Munich, the airport was completely covered in snow. Private planes were immobilized, in some cases frozen in what looks like kind of a take-off position, because snow was stacked up on their tail-sections. And reportedly, some of these planes were supposed to head to the COP28 Climate Summit."

This is ironic in the sense that the effects of climate change grounded planes heading to the climate summit, not ironic in the sense that the snow disproves climate change. So I'll give Matt a "half right" here.

9:30: "These climate activists gathered in Washington DC to send the message that the world was getting way too hot. And, if you don't recall this, a record snowstorm completely shut down the whole protest."

As stated previously, weather ≠ climate. That snowstorm was an instance of weather, a short term localized event whereas climate refers to long-term weather patterns and data seen over long periods of time.

The fact that Matt is trying to position himself as some kind of climate expert while seemingly not knowing the difference between weather and climate shows just how ridiculous his points are.

11:21: "And it's a remarkable clip for so many reasons, for example you also heard the now familiar retort from one of the climate activists in that clip, and she insists that 'weather is different from climate'. That's an important line and again a very familiar one, we hear this all the time now. That weather is not the same a climate, so they talk about climate change, it's not about weather. But that's totally false of course, the literal dictionary definition of climate is 'the weather conditions prevailing in general over a long period.' So saying that weather is different from climate is like saying water is different from H20, it doesn't even make any sense."

The key phrase here is "long period". What Matt doesn't seem to be getting is that the storm in DC, and any other instance of cold weather that he wants to throw out there, is a short-term weather event whereas climate is the long-term patterns in weather conditions (and other climate related things such as temperature, etc) over time.

"Saying water is different from H2O"

This argument is really really dumb. Climate and weather are different forms of measurement, water and H20 are the same compound.

12:42: "And they transitioned very soon afterwards to exclusively talking about 'climate change' instead of 'global warming'. And the reason is obvious, climate change gives them a catch-all that they can always blame in any context, they don't have to risk any more embarrassing photo-ops where they're whining about 'global warming' as they're being pummeled by snow."

First of all, global warming refers to the overall temperature of the planet which we already established is going up.

Now, why do scientists and researchers prefer to use the term climate change? It's because the term climate change encompasses more things than just the Earths temperature rising, such as rising sea levels and wind patterns. Both terms have been in use for years.

15:41: "Now, just as a factual matter, none of that is true."

Here Matt is talking about a speech Hillary Clinton gave where she brought up the fact that deaths due to extreme heat disproportionately affect women.

She brought up a statistic that says that 61,000 deaths occurred in Europe last summer because of extreme heat. This is accurate and I'll leave the study here if you want to read it yourself.

15:47: "Extreme cold kills far more people than extreme heat."

Matt is actually right here, extreme cold does kill more people than extreme heat.

However, Matt is ignoring the broader context of what Hillary Clinton was saying. The point that Clinton was making was that the temperatures are clearly getting more extreme worldwide and that needs to be addressed. It isn't normal for 61,000 people in Europe to die because of extreme heat.

Just turning around and going "What about extreme cold?" ignores the broader context about climate change.

16:23: "In most cases the heat will not affect you that quickly or at all. Even in 90 degree temperatures, if you find a shady spot and have enough water to drink you can lay around outside all day!"

Does Matt not realize how insanely hot 90 degrees is? For reference, most scientists agree that 95 degrees Fahrenheit is the upper-limit for most human survival.

Also, what about humidity? High humidity can have a massive impact on how quickly humans get dehydrated. Plus, what about people with health concerns or generally less heat tolerant bodies?

To make a blanket statement like that is quite frankly pretty dangerous.

16:50: "Talking about deaths related to climate is like talking about deaths related to human existence."

This is ignoring the fact that we can mitigate the effects of climate change while death by "human existence" is inevitable.

17:01: "But, your just supposed to buy into it and smile and wave as hoards of so-called 'climate refugees' flood into this country, which is really what this is all about for her."

Ah yes, the Great Replacement Theory, only now it is being repackaged to fit the climate change isn't real narrative.

Fun fact: The number of American's born each year is higher than the number of immigrants who become citizens. This alone disproves the Great Replacement Theory.

17:45: "Good thing we didn't experience pandemics historically, like all those people during the Black Death. Pandemics are a new thing because of Climate Change."

Nobody said that pandemics are a new thing because of climate change. What people are saying is that climate change increases the probability of more pandemics.

To give one example, the increased heat and deforestation (one of the causes of climate change) have caused animals to migrate to areas that they normally wouldn't be in and share germs with other animals.

18:12: "And now the left is using climate change in much the same way, it's an unkillable ever evolving enemy and in order to combat it we're told that we need to destroy everything that's important to civilization."

If you thought I was being overdramatic when I said that Matt regularly proclaims that things he doesn't like will lead to the downfall of civilization, here you go.

18:22: "The Department of Agriculture in Ireland recently considered a plan to kill 200,000 cows to reduce emissions. So, they're thinking about literal animal sacrifice to save the climate."

Note how that plan isn't actually final policy and wasn't implemented meaning Matt is talking about something that was proposed and probably won't ever happen.

Also, cows are responsible for about 40 percent of methane emissions. While killing cows is probably not the most productive way of combating this issue, that plan isn't "animal sacrifice" because a sacrifice is something done for no good reason (usually to appeal to a deity).

So, that was Matt's take on climate change. Now we get into the part where Matt gets transphobic. If you want to turn around now, that is perfectly understandable. My personal position is obviously that trans rights are human rights and that Matt Walsh is a a massive bigot. If your don't want to read the rest of this deeply bigoted episode, cheers and I'll see you in the next one!

21:42: "So, we have an important report here from the Daily Wire. It says 'Trans Identifying People Continue To Have Mental Health Issues, Even After Transgender Medical Treatment, A New Study From Finland Shows'."

So, Matt is talking about a study published by European Psychiatry that states that transgender people still have mental health issues after medical treatment.

It's important to remember two things:

1): There have been numerous studies showing the long-term benefits of gender affirming care. Nobody has said that gender affirming care will immediately cure every single mental health issue a person has, but in the long run it has been shown to be beneficial,

2): This study doesn't take away the bodily autonomy and rights that transgender people possess. Transgender people absolutely have the right to choose their gender, despite what Matt is claiming here.

23:22: "It's why I've said there have not been very many reliable studies on the effects of quote on quote gender affirming care because all of this is so new."

"Studies aren't reliable unless they say what I want them to say!"

Also, if studies on gender affirming care aren't reliable because all of this is so new, that argument applies to this study as well.

23:49: "I have read not one single study that measures the psychological impact of making your child sleep outside in the doghouse for a month...But that's because we don't need studies on that, you don't need to study it, we just know intuitively that treating your child like a dog is a very bad thing."

Matt really likes this argument that accepting transgender people is akin to treating a child like an animal. Matt loves this argument so much that he wrote an entire "childrens" (really for conservative parents as no child could begin to grasp the point Matt is trying to make in it) book called Johnny The Walrus based around this premise.

The point is moot since in both Johnny The Walrus and this argument, it is the parents forcing the child to act like an animal instead of a child coming out. If you took a child to a transgender medical specialist and it was clear that the parents are pressuring and or forcing the kid, they would almost certainly stop treatment immediately. Also, men and women are (shocker) way more similar biologically than men/dogs/walruses.

Secondly, Matt's entire argument that gender affirming surgeries are being done on children is based on disinformation.

While some trans children do come out, the extent of them coming out is mostly limited to pronouns and occasionally hormones, even then it's rare and usually reserved for people in their late teens. Surgery is restricted to adults 18 and up with rare exceptions.

Also also, what about circumcision? While I am not against circumcision, a newborn infant cannot consent to having their foreskin cut off. If Matt opposes gender affirming care, surely he would oppose that, yet I never hear him talk about that.

24:32: "Just as we know intuitively, or should know, that having your child castrated and sterilized is also a very horrific form of abuse."

Again, surgery is rarely given to minors and the effects of hormone therapy are reversible. And also, characterizing trans surgery as "castration" is a dangerous and nasty mischaracterization.

If Matt is talking about puberty blockers as chemical castration, he is also incorrect. The effects of puberty blockers are reversible if you stop taking the medication.

27:40: "This is a YouTuber, a man who is pretending to be a woman, and he's berating an employee at a pizza shop for 'misgendering him'."

Really only reactionary conservative media figures like Matt Walsh are talking about this story.

The "trans-freakout" is one of Matt's favorite tropes that he uses to demonize transgender people as narcissistic and evil. Usually these videos are taken out of context and were brought on by the person the trans person in question is "freaking out" on being a complete dick to them previously. This one is not that, however we need to keep in mind that one person isn't representative of the transgender community.

The TikToker in question is JaeGottlieb, and she has a long history of seeking out drama. She apparently is known for manufacturing these kinds of "freakouts" and even did the same thing a couple days ago with a plumber. Considering the fact that she started out by asking the guy what he thought her pronouns are, I fully believe this person was picking a fight for the sake of drama. Unfortunately, there are people like this who don't know/don't care about how their actions provide fuel to bigots like Matt Walsh that impacts the broader trans and LGBTQ+ community and are simply out there to stir up drama for clicks.

However, that doesn't make her representative of the broader trans community that just wants to be left alone and respected. Every group of people on the planet has assholes, that's just a fact of life.

30:28: "I'm telling you, every time I see one of these videos I pray. I pray for the day when one of these people will try to do this, put me on camera and try to put me on the spot like this. 'Do you think I look like a man?'. Yes you do, a weird ugly man."

Yeah, that's a hateful quote and I hope to god I don't have to explain the irony of Matt complaining about "bullying" while also spewing stuff like this, but I feel like it is important to preserve when Matt's fans cite Matt as a guy who is "just asking questions".

To "ask questions" is to go in knowing that you do not know the answer. When Matt goes and asks people "What is a woman?" (a film which we might cover at some point if I can figure out a way to get it for free, in the meantime there are some really great YouTube videos explaining why it was completely made in bad faith) he already knows the answer in his mind.

He has this bigoted notion in his mind that transgender people are just "weird ugly men in costumes" and nothing on this planet is ever going to change that, not you and not me. So even if someone gave the most intricate and detailed response ever to Matt's questions, and people have, he would just grin smugly and carry on with his life.

So let's keep quotes like this in mind when we see Matt try to say that trans people are "victims" and he "feels sorry for them". It's moments like this where he reveals what he truly believes.

Man, we're only halfway through the episode and I already want to throw my computer through a window.

32:52: "But most of these people are not confused, this person is just a bad person. A raging narcissist who only wants attention and wants to harm other people."

And this right here ladies and gentlemen, is why anti-trans violence is on the rise. Yes, what JaeGottlieb did was wrong but that's not even relevant anymore. What is relevant is Matt's portrayal of a massive section of the population as "raging narcissists who only want to harm other people".

This is how hate crimes happen. Someone sees this and internalizes this rhetoric about transgender people, he then decides he's going to "teach them a lesson" and before you know it someone is dead.

How is this any different from people saying that all black people are lazy and criminals back in the days of segregation? Spoiler alert; it isn't!

36:09: "And they come up to you, unsolicited, and say 'Tell me your perception of the world' and then you tell them (and they say) 'Nope, incorrect!'"

First of all, not every trans person runs around asking people what they think their pronouns are. As a matter of fact I would be willing to guess that 98% of trans people don't do that, most just want to be treated with respect like everyone else.

Second of all, how is that any different from what Matt does? In What Is A Woman? Matt went to a woman's march and asked people that very same question until they rightfully ejected him for being a troll.

So, coming up to people unsolicited, ordering them to tell them their perception of the world, and then saying it's incorrect later on.

Next up, Matt talks about how "Rizz" was named the Oxford Dictionary word of the year. We're not going to spend time on this because who the hell cares? It's a really dumb story that absolutely nobody cares about except for Matt Walsh. I honestly do not care whatsoever what the Oxford Dictionary word of the year is and neither does 90% of the population. It's unimportant and this post is getting really long. It is kind of funny in an "Am I out of touch? No, it's the children who are wrong." sort of way though. Matt then does the segment of his show where he reads comments, don't care about that either. I haven't watched the show that he is talking about so I can't effectively comment on it in the name of fairness. Now, not content with just being a transphobe, Matt decides to engage in downplaying racism.

56:33: "You aren't gonna believe this, but James Causey is a black journalist who says that he has been the victim of racism. I know it's shocking to hear a journalist claim he has been the victim of racism, it's been at least 27 minutes since the last time a journalist whined about racism."

Well, maybe if racism wasn't such a widespread issue you wouldn't be seeing the amount of journalists coming out against racism that you are seeing.

Reading news articles and being willfully ignorant about their messages to end the show seems to be a common theme at the Daily Wire. We recently witnessed it with Ben Shapiro where he read an article about Beyonce and completely missed the point of the entire piece.

58:14: "And this grown man claims to be actively in pain, traumatized, from one alleged letter with some bad words 15 years ago."

Matt is ignoring that Causey later goes on to say that he later received multiple letters with slurs in them, some addressed to his house. Also, notice how Matt is downplaying the N word as "just a bad word". Real classy.

58:33: "He continues, claiming that this one racist letter was only the tip of the iceberg and soon he was buried under an avalanche of racist hatred all being targeted, for some reason, at some guy who writes a column that nobody reads."

So, when a black journalist gets racist letters and emails it never happened! It's so blatantly clear the game that Matt Walsh is playing, essentially downplaying this guys experiences to downplay racism as a whole.

1:00:13: "Ok, so he's claiming that some racist attacked him after he wrote a column recounting his experience at a daddy daughter dance. And he says that this person took out the time to cross out the word 'black' and replace it with the N-word. Well here's the curious thing, I read the column which he links to, the word black does not appear at all in the column."

Yeah, he could be lying about that. But he also could just have misremembered which column it was, I'd imagine the N-word takes mental priority over what column it was. It could also be that the word "black" appeared in the print edition.

I don't know, I just find it odd for a guy who was intentionally trying to pull one over on the public to link the column that he is actively lying about for all to see.

1:01:30: "Now the odd thing is that Lumpkin was there as a TV reporter with a TV crew and yet no one caught this racist attack on camera."

Taylor Lumpkin never posted footage of the Country Thunder music festival where she was called an N-Word period. I would imagine that Taylor wouldn't want footage of such a sensitive attack online for the entire world to see.

There is also the chance that this happened before the cameras were set up. She did state that she "left humiliated", could it be that it happened while they were setting up and as a result nobody caught it? Stating that people who claim to be victims of racism are liars is really gross behavior.

1:06:28: "It's almost as if the James Causey's of the world give so much publicity and power to the N-Word because they want people to say it."

Almost as gross as Matt saying here that black people are playing this game of reverse psychology because they want to be called racial slurs so they can later play the victim.

I hopefully don't have to explain why that is disgusting but, in case you are curious, no black people don't want to be called a racial slur unprovoked.

Not using racial slurs is basic-ass shit man.

Conclusion:

Anywho, that all the Matt Walsh I can take for now and the episode only has around 40 seconds left in it anyway. So, what have we learned?

We learnt that Matt Walsh knows nothing about climate change and is a massive bigot, so we haven't treaded much new ground. However, it is valuable to document if only to show how uniformed and how much of a bigot this guy is.

Cheers and I'll see you all in the next one.

[melanieexox]

So, let me get this straight.... Dancing With The Stars sent Hetty's husband (Matt Walsh) home, but kept Jamie-ABUSER-Lynn Spears and Adrian ABUSER Peterson for the next round.

You're absolute trash, DWTS.

[andsheoverthinks]

how are you going to call yourself radical and then cape for matt walsh just because he said trans woman bad

cropped out the user because i'm not trying to start drama.

this is sad. rolling over for this horrible scrote because he pretends to care about 'degradation of women.' this isn't a case of a 'broken clock is right twice a day' or 'ideological purity is bad.'

it's interesting how libfems are never the broken clock that's right. it's always right wing men or tradwives. in this instance, it's a man who's pro teen pregnancy, anti abortion, anti same sex marriage, he's racist, sexist, homophobic, et cetera. and you STILL choose to platform him.

the right wing aren't stupid, they know they can use gender critical to 'recruit' feminists (make it look like feminists agree with them), and make radical feminism just as impotent as choice feminism. the right wing is remarkably skilled at stripping meaning from movements and symbols. the word 'woke' belonged to the Black community for DECADES before the right wing took it and drained it of meaning. don't let them do the same to you. it's not a matter of ideological purity, it's a matter of integrity.

what anti-feminists say to libfems/choice feminists: well, YOU degrade women, you promote onlyfans and porn and prostitution, how can you say you're pro women? your movement is meaningless.

what anti-feminists say to radfems: well, YOU cape for conservatives, you're on their side, you'll roll over for the next person to say trans women bad, how can you say your number #1 priority is women? your movement is meaningless.

you are actively ceding ground to these racist, sexist, homophobic fucks. i don't get this. you can't turn around and cry when people from outside say 'radfems support conservatives' because some of you ARE, intentionally or not. words are power. DON'T FUCKING CEDE GROUND.

[la-pou-belle]

@hadesoftheladies oh, yes, I'm *definitely* going to listen to a self proclaimed TERF's impassioned pleas that there are WAY worse celebs than JK Rowling, and actually she's *so* amazing because of all the money she's thrown at different organizations, including those repressing Scotland's right to independence. I totally agree with you, the money she spends, even the evil money, gives her free license to do whatever she likes. I think she should take up manhunting next! #girlboss !

I feel so bad for JK Rowling and all the bad press she's getting for being besties with self proclaimed fascists like Matt Walsh and Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull. Poor her! Cause you're RIGHT, there ARE worse celebs - she hasn't earned all this hate! She should get the chance to work harder for it and really prove herself! Get fully initiated, if you know what I mean! ;) Just because she denies the Holocaust, directly funds govt suppression, harasses the same groups Nazis target, and spends all of her time with Nazis surely doesn't mean poor little her can be called a Nazi! What is this, 1940s Germany? So silly! She's gunning to be a Neo-Nazi, doofus! Don't belittle a woman's aspirations and accomplishments like that!

If this is who you want to sob and piss and shit yourself about, crying "misogyny" when sometime tries to hold a rich white lady-Nazi accountable, by all means, do that with your life. Just know that you're a fucking loser. If anything, you should be happy that the public can manage to take a joke like JKR seriously after all this time; in the eons passed no one would've listened to a single word of hers, fascist and bigoted or not. So really, her holocaust denialism making headlines is a diversity win, and you get yet another excuse to bitch and moan about your favorite washed-up elite.

[lizardbytheriver]

Matt Walsh: "Overturning Roe is a great and necessary first step, and something to certainly celebrate, but it's only a first step, as far as I'm concerned. The next step is to abolish abortion and criminalize it nationwide. The next step is to essentially do what idiot leftists think is already happening. They think that overturning Roe v. Wade means that abortion is abolished nationwide. That's not what it means. But that's what they're worried about, and that's actually what we should try to do.

As always with the left, I take a, you know, I'll give you something to cry about approach with the left. You're going to cry about it? Then, you know, I'll give you something to cry about. Let's go ahead and criminalize it nationwide. And that is the next fight and Republicans have to lean into it. Because the die is cast. The greatest cultural battle of our lives doesn't end now, it begins.

Democrats are going to do everything in their power, and everything not in their power, to usurp the Supreme Court decision and ensure that babies continue to die at the same rate or at a higher rate than before. Republicans must respond not by declaring victory and just washing their hands of the issue, not by hiding from it, but by pushing back in the other direction. They, the Democrats, want to codify abortion nationwide. We have to push to criminalize it. There's no escaping the fight now. You're either with us or against us on this. And that goes for every elected Republican."

Matt Walsh and Republicans like him want a National Abortion Ban. Matt Walsh and Republicans like him want to criminalize Abortion. Matt Walsh and Republicans like him want to control other's bodies. Matt Walsh's monologue's about giving the Left "something to cry about", show that these actions are not being done to "preserve the 'life' of the unborn", rather these actions are being done due to a desire to be cruel. Matt Walsh is not a fringe figure on the Right. Matt Walsh works for Ben Shapiro. Matt Walsh is invited to Conservative Events. While many in the Conservative base and Republican base do not want criminalization of Abortion. Matt Walsh is thought-leader and figurehead of the Anti-Abortion Movement on the Right. We should not ignore that powerful/influential individuals want a complete ban on Abortion. We should not ignore that powerful/influential individuals are working to criminalize Abortion completely. You are not crazy for fearing that Abortion may be criminalized. Those on the Right are currently working to criminalize all Abortion. As always, shame on any TERFs who think Matt Walsh is an ally to them. As always, shame on anyone who is Anti-Abortion or Anti-Choice, you are no better than Matt Walsh (who aside from being Anti-Choice is also a Transphobe and a Racist).

[do-you-have-a-flag]

I wanna give more context so here is my analysis of the chain of events here:

Fox News and right wing conservatives interested in escalating culture wars for profit have a motive in discrediting the Washington post and furthering transphobic policies. a big part of that is using the concept of predation of children which is an old tactic used against homosexuality but is also currently feeding into more extreme conspiracy theories about politicians ect. It is an extremely profitable narrative both for their target audience and outrage clicks and traffic for their advertisers.

As a part of the current wave of transphobia they are targeting Odele Pax, who is trans femme, and this could possibly be because in the past she has spoken to the press about her own name change process as a part of a larger story about lawyers waiving their fees to represent LGBTQ+ people.

So the focus on valentine's day and asexuality, in this case, is likely to be a shield for the larger discourse they are shaping equating trans people to deviant predators. It's a way to harass someone for being trans without directly saying so.

The fox news article does not say much and mostly targets the washington post but Matt Walsh's video opens with a stated "normal" valentine's day joke with his audience: guys who forgot to get their wives a present so they pick up cooking utensils at the store as a romantic gesture. I'm not even going to get into all the stereotypes in this because it is half joking and boring.

Matt Walsh targets Odele calling her immature and mocking her trans activist named (ikea?) sharks (which is, to the best of my knowledge, a bit of a meme for trans girls?). he calls her life "utterly pathetic and depressing"

He then continues to do his usual thing of deliberately mocking and refusing to correctly interpret asexuality to discredit it entirely. it's the same "that's fake" and "you're not oppressed" arguments a-spec people are used to hearing for years now, only with the addition of attributing the term's existence to "the left" and "narcissism"

The real core here is when he gets into how it's "more bizarre than marching around and claiming to be proud of your sexual attraction." it loops back to classic homophobia disguised as the sentiment of upholding normality, that it's not normal or necessary to do any kind of activism or pride demonstration

SO to summarise:

The old tactic of equating homosexuals and transgender people with predators is being continued with the added elements of infantilising, profiting from political culture war narratives, mocking and discrediting asexuality as a part of a larger dismissal of LGBTQ+ rights.

This isn't a "first they came for X and now they're coming for Y" this is "they are coming for Y because they are a part of X"

I don't see this as aroace people being targeted separately. i read this as a flattening of all identities to equate them with each-other and label them as "deviance" "mental illness" or "pedophillia". The narrative being crafted is "it's all leftist bullshit and also it's immoral" and ace people are being used as a convenient way to avoid transphobia accusationsit's

THIS is why solidarity matters. Not because "oh no we're next" but because the distinction never existed and what facet people are going to let themselves be seen as attacking is what changes. it was always an attack on all of us.

So within two days of each other, Fox News writes an article comparing aromanticism and asexuality to pedophilia, and then Matt Walsh releases a video saying asexuality is a mental illness and asexuals are tricking teenagers into having depression.

Not sure what’s going on right now over in Conservative World, but it’s a hell of wild U-turn for them to suddenly switch from “Oh no! The left is sexualizing our children!” to “Oh no! The left is asexualizing our children!”

[billthedrake]

ORAL FIXATION (PART THREE)

(This is a story I wrote years ago and decided to rework and expand.)

Our next party was the following week. The fathers had invented some Kiwanis Club meeting, and I think Mr. Ramirez told his wife that he and Alex had a meeting for the football team.

Matt Carson answered the door this time. "Hey Mike. Hi, Mr. Walsh," he greeted. He was in a trimmer T-shirt and shorts than normal and I had to admit it showed off his tall, athletic body. Matt looked good, his curly brown hair still wet from a recent shower, and I could instantly tell my Dad was attracted to him, maybe more than normal.

"Looking good, Matt," Dad winked with a friendly clap to the basketball jock's back.

"Thanks, sir," the jock replied with a smile that made me realize Matt was in a flirty mood. Such a change from his normal, almost passive demeanor. "You gonna draw Dad's keys tonight?" he asked.

The forwardness took Dad off guard, too, I could tell. He laughed and smiled back, "God I hope so."

"Come on in," Matt said, kind of puffing out his chest a little. "We're waiting for one more group."

It was going to be a full house tonight. There were the Ramirez men and the Gehrings. Paul Heller and his dad returned, and there was a new group: the Marinos, the father older in his early to mid 50s and two college-aged sons, who I immediately recognized as twins.

Mr. Marino gleefully scanned the room, and I could tell he was glad he'd joined our little key party. As he patted his son's backs he ushered the twins in and turned to Mr. Carson. "You weren't kidding, Dave, I'd do any one of them."

I saw Jake give a little cocky smile as he spread his legs some.

Mr Carson chuckled and held out his bowl. "Well you brought two, you get two... I take it you brought an extra set of keys."

Mr. Marino grinned big as he fished into his pocket for them. I could tell he had his eyes on Jake. I couldn't blame him. I wouldn't mind the man sucking me. He was definitely DILF material - he looked like he was very well preserved late 40s, fit body, almost a nature-y type but with short-cropped thinning hair. He was hot as fuck.

But if I had to pick I'd choose Mr. Gehring, that blond California golfer dad, who was chatting with Mr. Ramirez and Henderson as the sons kind of hung out together.

As the newcomer dropped two keys in the bowl, Dave Carson announced in a louder voice, "Just a reminder, guys, Dads are here to suck and suck only."

I scanned the fathers in attendance and wondered if any were eager to do more. I sometimes wondered if Dad would ever make the moves to do anything else, but he seemed fixated on my dick and loved sucking it.

The men all gathered, and even in the oversized living room it felt like a packed crowd: six fathers, seven sons. Dave Carson swirled the bowl as he turned toward Mr. Gehring. "You get first draw this time, Jeff."

Mr. Gehring stepped up with an excited grin and pulled out the first keys.

"Those are mine," Mr. Marino said.

"Too bad I only drew one," Mr. Gehring joked, clearly into the idea of twins. He looked over the college guys. "So... which one...?"

"Your pick," Mr. Carson announced in his role as party host.

Mr. G looked like he was having a hard time deciding. "Why don't you guys pick?" he said to the twins.

One of them smiled, and said, "I'll go." He turned to his brother and asked, "OK, Randy?"

Randy grinned back, "Go for it, bro."

The other twin, whose name I didn't catch kind of sauntered over to Gehring and shook his hand, almost formally. The Marino twins weren't overly big or jocky, but both had well-honed frat-boy bodies.

Mr. Gehring leaned and in and whispered something, which made the college guy smile big. Then they turned and left the room.

"OK," Carson smiled. "You're next Joe," he said to Mr. Marino. "You get two draws."

Joe Marino reached in the bowl and pulled out a set of keys. "Whose are these?"

"Those would be mine." It was Mr. Ramirez, who patted the strong shoulder of Alex, who was a tight end on my team. I didn't hang out with Alex too much outside of football stuff - practice, game trips, and fundraisers, and I always thought he was more religious or something. But since he and his dad had showed up at these parties, I had a different view of him. And he was clearly a horndog, a thick almost wedgelike cock rode up in his sweatpants as he crossed over to join Mr. Marino.

"Jesus," the DILF growled as he eyed up the 6'4" Latino hunk. Alex was big and muscular, even for a senior. "Hey," he whispered to Alex before turning to some of the other dads. "OK if I feel up my prize now?"

"We usually wait till we're in a private room," Mr. Carson explained.

"Why so goddamn coy, Dave?" Dan Heller interjected. Maybe since it was his second time at the party, his intensity didn't phase me as much this time. I actually found it refreshing. "We all know what we're here for."

My father was more conciliatory with Mr. Carson. "Maybe we should reconsider the ground rules, Dave," he said. "If the Dads are all OK with it."

Dave Carson shrugged. "All right... any objections?"

"None for me," Mr. Ramirez grinned. I think he wanted to see Joe Marino work that thick football jock boner his son was showing.

"Nor me," Dad said. "But maybe we should clarify how far is OK.... I mean are we doing this? Sucking in front of the others?"

"Hell, if the dad and son are both OK it," Dan Heller offered. "Otherwise, there are the private rooms."

I turned to look at the host. I thought Carson would have an objection but he got a goofy smile. "All right, that works.... God, we really doing this?"

Joe Marino's handsome tanned face got a bright smile. He looked at Alex as he cautiously ran his strong hands up the player's sweats, encasing the fat bulge. "You OK with this?"

"Definitely, sir," Alex grinned. And like that Mr. Marino was peeling the elastic band over that fat erection and leaning in.

"Oh yeah," the jock grunted as the 50-something man started licking his way along the bone. The room was pretty silent and all of our eyes were on the pair as Joe finally pulled that fat prick toward his face and started swallowing it.

"Suck my dick, Mr. Marino," Alex said with a combination of deference and horniness. THe man did, working more and more inches with each mouth stroke, almost getting to the base of that 5 and a half inch fireplug before pulling off with a slurp.

"I believe I get to draw another set of keys," he said in a deep horny voice.

Dave Carson chuckled as he offered the bowl again. Mr. Marino hadn't even gotten up from his squatting cocksucking position as he reached in and grabbed another set.

It was Dad's.

I was horned up by the display and decided to take the initiative. I stepped up and started undoing my jeans. I'd gone commando and my dick stuck out hard and erect as I opened the fly.

"That's beautiful," Joe almost whispered then looked up to my face. "You're a football jock too." I couldn't tell if it was a statement or question.

"Yes, sir," I said.

"My lucky day," he enthused, then started going down on me.

I wasn't prepared for how hot it would be to get a blowjob while other men watched. Including my Dad. I actually would glance over his way. Maybe I was concerned he'd be jealous or something, but he had a look of pure lust as I got serviced by Mr. Marino.

Just as suddenly as Joe Marino went down on me, he pulled off. "Nice," he muttered before leaning back over to suck Alex. I looked at my teammate, who had a big shit-eating grin on his face.

"This is pretty fucking awesome, isn't it Walsh?" he asked.

"God yeah," I hissed, watching how hungry and eager Marion was in sucking Alex's fat one.

"Looks like Jeff is missing the party," Dan Heller chuckled.

"My turn," I heard my Dad say. I turned to watch him step to the key bowl. Just as he reached in, I felt Marino's hot mouth descend on me once more.

"Yours?" Dad asked the host. Mr. Carson nodded.

"Hot," Matt grinned, and the normally shy basketball jock walked over, his dick already throwing big in his basketball shorts. "So, Mr. Walsh, you gonna want a private room, or..."

Dad looked over at me, silently asking for permission. I nodded, even as I reached down to guide Joe Marino's head up and down on my dick.

"Bring that big boy out, Matt," Dad encouraged as he squatted down to a crouched position.

I couldn't keep my eyes off it. I had a sense the only man who wasn't watching was Joe, who was now easing off me and going back to Alex. Even the tight end's attention was mostly on Matt Carson peeling down those shorts and the insanely long dick that was flopping out.

I had a sense Matt was hung, but that snake was a good ten inches. Dad was excited, too, reaching out to run his fingers along the length of the teen's endowment. "Your daddy has a pretty big challenge if he handles this on a regular basis."

"Yeah, I guess so, Mr. Walsh," Matt laughed and ran his fingers teasingly through Dad's salt and pepper hair. It was hot to watch the way the basketball jock wasn't overly aggressive or anything. But he knew he had a big dick and he knew Dad wanted to worship it. It was a sexy confidence as he pulled my father toward his hardon.

I could have watched. I wanted to watch. But Joe was back on my dick and I felt he deserved my attention. Alex had pulled his shirt up behind his neck, showing off his still smooth muscle. We inched closer, so my arm pressed against his and our dicks were closer, allowing Mr. Marino to go back and forth more easily.

"Let me try this," the DILF finally said and pulled Alex's and my dicks together. Opening wide, the man stuffed both in. It wasn't good head in the usual sense, and Joe Marino could only work about an inch of us, back and forth. But it was kinky and the sensation of my dick pressed against Alex's fat one was wild. Like we were blood brothers or something.

Alex was thinking the same thing and a goofy grin formed on his cute face. "Hot, huh?"

"Fuck, yeah," I said.

We were absorbed in Mr. Marino's double stuffing trick that hearing Paul Heller's booming voice surprised me. "You pick, John."

I heard the clank of keys, then Mr. Ramirez called out, "Who's are these?"

I watched as Randy, one of Joe's twins, grinned and replied, "Dad's!" The college frat boy got up off the couch. He patted his dad on his shoulder, but Mr. Marino didn't stop his sucking.

"Man, I gotta get off," Alex pleaded. "OK if I go solo from here on out, buddy?" he asked me.

I chuckled and pulled back some. Joe didn't break pace for a beat. He started really going to town on Alex's fat one. The tight end was primed and it took about a half minute of the full blowjob treatment to get there.

"Oh fuck, I'm gonna cum!" he announced and I watched his tan body flush red and his muscles tense. Up till then I'd seen Jake Gehring cum, right next to me. This was a similar experience, almost a bonding moment with my teammate. But Alex's orgasm was different, more openly enthusiastic. It was hot to watch.

"OK your turn Walsh," he grinned as he finally came down and pulled back. "He's really hungry, man, so feed him a big one."

I was grooving on Ramirez's horny vibe and felt myself getting into the groove as Joe Marino sucked faster and harder. As I watched that silver-flecked hair and handsome face bob up and down, I wondered how long he'd been sucking his twin sons or how often he did it.

That idea did it. I nutted hard and Mr. Marino did his best to suck down my seed as I pumped.

"Fuck yeah, dude!" Alex encouraged as I gave it up, and I looked at him with a relaxed smile.

We actually fist bumped when I was done. I worried Mr. Marino would be offended or something but he laughed a little. He turned his attention to the others. Alex's Dad was going down on Joe's son, a nice slow gentle suck that Randy seemed to enjoy. My Dad was doing his best to throat Matt's big schlong. He'd worked up to about eight inches, and Matt stood, hands on his hips and looking down at my father servicing him.

I didn't remember hearing the other keys being drawn, but as I plopped down on the couch next to Alex, I saw Mr. Carson wasn't there. Apparently he and Paul Heller had gone off to a bedroom. But Paul's Dad was on his knees, bracing his body as my buddy Jake was thrusting wildly into his throat. Jake's shorts were pooled around his ankles and his smooth buns clenched rhythmically. He'd told me about face fucking Mr. Heller, but I half thought he was bullshitting.

But indeed, Jake's hands gripped Dan Heller's skull and held the man steady as his thrusts pumped faster, deep and hard.

The view made me stay hard and I looked over at Alex, who was also boned up still, watching his father blow Randy Marino. The two dudes eyes were locked, Randy shooting Alex a goofy grin, before throwing a similar one my way.

It took me a second to realize what the frat guy was grinning about, but I noticed Randy's dad kneel on the floor and get between my spread legs. Joe Marino was going for seconds.

My trigger wasn't as quick this time, so I enjoyed watching the action as Joe went back and forth between me and Alex. I scooted closer to the tight end once more, wondering if our bond was going to be closer now. I couldn't see how it wouldn't.

Particularly once Alex Ramirez got that smirk on his face. "Hell yeah, Walsh," he whispered, and his face approached mine. We turned heads a little, and our lips met. I'd never thought Alex was the kind of dude to kiss, but maybe he thought the same thing of me. But there we were making out, tongues and all, while Mr. Marino fellated the big tight end, working the jock up to a second orgasm.

I was ready for a second release when Alex pulled back and nudged the DILF sucker off his sensitive bone. "Ease up, man," he urged with a gentle laugh.

Joe gave that fat prick a final kiss then turned his attention to me. It felt great, and the idea this man was gonna suck me off a second time turned me on. As did Alex's strong ball playing hands working up under my T-shirt and along my abs. And it was hot to watch Jake on the other couch, fucking his nut into Dan Heller without fanfare.

But the trigger that tripped my wires was seeing Dad deep throat Matt Carson. Not going fast or hard, just coaxing his throat to take all ten inches with a slow steady descent. Repeatedly.

Matt was getting worked up. "Gonna cum, Mr. Walsh," he announced.

Dad moaned excitedly, bracing for the teen jock's sperm.

But I shot a second before Matt Carson did. My head getting dizzy even from the intensity of my orgasm and the overstimulation on my prick.

My now, Mr. Gehring was walking back into the room, the other Marino twin in tow. The college dude was flushed from the blowjobs he'd just received and was making his clothes more presentable.

"Fellas," Jeff Gehring laughed as he looked around. "What the hell did I miss?"

[greenwire]

Matt Walsh, the conservative podcaster man, made that documentary. And ever since, there's been nothing but seething. And this article especially rubbed me the wrong way.

Firstly, there's this:

Yeah, how dare a "random African tribe" have an opinion on gender! The reason why Walsh "picked a random African tribe" is because for well over a decade now, gender theorists and online commentators have claimed that the sex binary is a white colonialist invention. That's why. And here you are sniffing that it's so "unhinged" to ask African people what they think. I think Matt Walsh is an absolute fucking racist, but you're over here dismissing the opinions of rural Africans out of hand, without having even heard what those opinions are.

This is an entire video and article response to the documentary, and you're not going to watch it? You'd literally rather put cat pee in your mouth than hear an opinion you know you'll disagree with??

The next five paragraphs go into the dishonesty of creationists. The author actually says, "why am I talking so much about evolution?" The answer to that is that the theory of natural selection is backed up by science, and the idea that you can change your biological sex with exogenous hormones and experimental surgeries is not. So it's more convenient for you to conflate the two and pretend that males can be women, if they really want to be.

Okay, so finally, at the end of the video, the answer to the question, "what is a woman?" It's supposed to be non-circular and not reliant on sex stereotypes.

"a person society associates with the female sex" sounds better than "anyone who identifies as a woman." But how does society associate a person with the female sex? Gender roles. As in, this is just saying "a woman is anyone who performs sufficient femininity and/or can be clearly recognized as an adult human female." To define women by femininity is sexist toward women. To even deny us a cohesive class, especially when our abusers and oppressors can clearly place us there, is sexist.

But anyone who has been in the community knows another glaring problem with this statement: the person making it is inadvertently excluding transwomen who don't pass. In fact, that takes the identity away from transwomen and puts it back to society. That means misgendering doesn't exist anymore. I've seen you, I'm part of society, I've decided whether or not you're a woman. Additionally, how does this jibe with the notion that transwomen not only are, but always have been women?

Even this youtuber is adding in caveats (about fifteen minutes worth) to this supposed simple, one-sentence definition, and saying it doesn't cover all the circumstances. No shit. When "woman" has to be a term open to anyone who claims it, but closed to anyone who doesn't claim it (yet), it'll sound like this.

I don't subscribe to Matt Walsh's theories or opinions on any other topic I've heard him elaborate. And I've only seen a heavily edited video of his Dr. Phil appearance. But on this one facet of this one topic, he's right. Biological sex is immutable. Women are adult human females. To open up the class of "women" to males means that "women" has to be reliant on sex stereotypes rather than sex.

[gothicprep]

still combing through the matt walsh trash and taking notes on it. got to a bit about trans athletes and the interviewees were making me seethe.

i was a Sports Person (and a pretty damn good one, at that) when i was in high school, and the people in this remind me of some of the bitter freak teammates i used to have to deal with. the types who delusionally believed they were the next phelps or bolt or whatever. referred to their sport as their "career". just fucking insufferable.

they were also fucking cancerous to team morale. even though track and swim meets are judged, to some extent, on the performance of individuals, they're scored as an aggregate of the team. and i swear to god, whenever we'd lose by a slim margin, these narcissistic babies would put on this sore loser song and dance about how much it sucked, even if their time was a new personal best.

"i worked so so hard to shave a quarter of a second off my time" yeah dumbass, so did the rest of us. "i qualified for states but i placed second in my heat. wah wah wah. i'm pissing and shitting in my diaper."

it was horrifically discouraging to some of the younger and less experienced teammates. this stuff is competitive, sure, but the entire point is self-improvement. it's important to remember that no one cares about sports unless you're in the top 0.0001%, and you probably aren't, so you shouldn't do this stuff for anyone but yourself.

[ladymariayuri]

Anyway I was top 0.5% in an fps game for 3 years as a loathed AFAB and trans women aren't why you're hardstuck. Skill issue + AFAB people are weaker and stupider uwu this is why trans women can't compete in "~REAL~ WOMENS SPACES debate needs to die you're just backpedaling on feminism in multiple ways + Matt Walsh needs to get shot in the street like a dog + cope + log off

Next time you want to dress up your hate rant as a women in gaming progressive discussion try harder and clean up your account

Twitter cringe tw but it's crazy how shit like this is always spouted by women who manage to both engage in regressive feminism (women are weakerrrr this is why im hardstuck bronze in valoraaaaant pick meeeee 🥺) and transmisogyny (self explanatory via what is a woman documentary support and the entire WOMEN SPORTS DEBAT) at the same time. Matt Walsh Daily Wire watcher L, kill yourself you ghoulish freak

[shoverse]

Did I tell you about the first, and currently only, soul I've received? Lol "received" makes it sound like I ordered it on Amazon. Haha... Let me reframe. Did I ever tell you about the first person I coerced into giving me their soul? I've told Servy this story before. (She wasn't impressed. 😔) Anyway, it all started when I commented on a post. (A bit like how all this started.) I don't need to tell you about the op. That mother fucker was insane! Before I could ask her to give me her soul, she announced to her followers that she was going back to a mental asylum. I kid you not! Wonder how she's doing now. Back to the story: through that girl, I met another girl. I saw my chance and I took it. For the first few days, weeks, she resisted. It's expected. I asked her many, many times to comply. I was very calm and polite. I told her I would leave her alone. (I'm not lying; you know how polite and enthusiastic I am). She laughed, said I was crazy, said she would never give her soul to a "bigoted transphobe" like Matt Walsh. 😏 After a week, I told her I would start having polite conversations with her friends. (Again, not lying). She was getting bored of me by then but still resisted. Most of her friends did the same thing she did, laugh and call me crazy, but some of her friends were a little too sensitive. Don't know how old they were, don't really care, they were under 15, so it's excuseable. She didn't like this, I didn't like it. I asked her dozens of times to just comply. Still, it was a no. She didn't understand how sincere I was. So I showed her. Few days passed with her being offline. Then she comes back and has the authority to tell me that she had a panic attack and begged me to leave her and her friends alone! Can you believe it? all those times I asked her. I could have said "no, now you're stuck with me." But I've got to make my daddy proud, you know. So we make a deal. I promise her that I'll 100% leave her and her friends alone if she gives me her soul. (Same deal as before) Moral of the story? Listen to what I say because I don't ever give up. Now I wanted to tell you this for 2 reasons. 1. I know pride is a sin, but I've got to say I'm quite proud of myself and her stupidity is hilarious. 2. I think you know what I'm going to say next. I tried with service, but I was hopeless. She didn't have a soul worth taking. But you, hmm, I'm not so sure. How about we work things out?

i have dyslexia i can't read that