#virtuaposting

[virtuagf]

$ ./love-without-emergency-clementine-morrigan.zine --logging debug

~~DEBUG LOGGING ON~~

TITLE: LOVE WITHOUT EMERGENCY

AUTHOR: clementine morrigan

FLAVOR: discussion, polyamory, trauma, attachment, love

SEGMENTATION FAULT (CORE DUMPED)

$ gfdb love-without-emergency-clementine-morrigan.zine dump.core

virtua gfdb (Prawn 16.1-0prawn1~24.10.13) 16.1

Copyright (C) 2024 Virtua Girl Foundation, Inc.

License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>

This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.

There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.

This GFDB was configured as "arm64-linux".

Type "show configuration" for configuration details.

For help, type "help".

(gfdb) bt

#0 love_is_an_action ()

i enjoy the concept that love is an action, but disagree in a way that feels like its on the edge between "important" and "nit picky". i can't decide which.

love is a feeling but expressing it, experiencing it, or remembering it are actions, and so take time

through action, someone can stoke love in you, and you can stoke love in someone.

sometimes its the smallest action in the world, or sometimes its as simple as being reminded or a previous expression of love.

but even that takes time

time is what makes love limited

you are time bound, your partners are time bound

being time bound is not anyone's fault, its a requirement of existing

what we do with our time matters.

how we show and express our feelings of love matters.

you may spend time showing your love to someone in a specific way, but that action may not resonante with them.

not everyone is receptive to the same expressions of love, and often an expression of love to one person ends up feeling like the opposite to another person.

(i think conflicts like that are the basis of attachment theory?)

(gfdb) quit

$ tiv lovewithoutwmergency.jpg

$ exit

Connection to virtuagf closed