#versus lithium

[shinygoku]

Also Solarpunk looks kinda homogenous and, as elegant as they can be, Maglevs don't have the swag of Steam Locomotives innit

[musettastone]

Omggg I nearly forgot that Daltons are a unit of measurement too lol

I'm [Not] sorry

[mariacallous]

BUENOS AIRES, Nov 19 (Reuters) - Argentina elected libertarian outsider Javier Milei as its new president on Sunday, rolling the dice on an outsider with radical views to fix an economy battered by triple-digit inflation, a looming recession and rising poverty.

Official results have not been released, but his rival, Peronist Economy Minister Sergio Massa, conceded in a speech. His candidacy was hampered by the country's worst economic crisis in two decades while he has been at the helm.

Milei is pledging economic shock therapy. His plans include shutting the central bank, ditching the peso, and slashing spending, potentially painful reforms that resonated with voters angry at the economic malaise, but sparked fears of austerity in others.

"Milei is the new thing, he's a bit of an unknown and it is a little scary, but it's time to turn over a new page," said 31-year-old restaurant worker Cristian as he voted on Sunday.

But Milei's challenges are enormous. He will have to deal with the empty coffers of the government and central bank, a creaking $44 billion debt program with the International Monetary Fund, inflation nearing 150% and a dizzying array of capital controls.

With many Argentines not fully convinced by either candidate, some had characterized the vote as a choice of the "lesser evil": fear of Milei's painful economic medicine versus anger at Massa and his Peronist party for an economic crisis that has left Argentina deeply in debt and unable to tap global credit markets.

Milei has been particularly popular among the young, who have grown up seeing their country lurch from one crisis to another.

"Our generation is pushing the presidency of Milei to stop our country being a pariah," said Agustina Lista, 22, a student in Buenos Aires.

Milei's win shakes up Argentina's political landscape and economic roadmap, and could impact trade in grains, lithium and hydrocarbons. Milei has criticized China and Brazil, saying he won't deal with "communists," and favors stronger U.S. ties.

The shock rise of the 53-year-old economist and former TV pundit has been the story of the election, breaking the hegemony of the two main political forces on the left and the right - the Peronists and the main Together for Change conservative bloc.

"The election marks a profound rupture in the system of political representation in Argentina," said Julio Burdman, director of the consultancy Observatorio Electoral, ahead of the vote.

Supporters of Massa, 51, an experienced political wheeler-dealer, had sought to appeal to voter fears about Milei's volatile character and "chainsaw" plan to cut back the size of the state.

"Milei's policies scare me," teacher Susana Martinez, 42, said on Sunday after she voted for Massa.

Milei is also staunchly anti-abortion, favors looser gun laws and has called Argentine Pope Francis a socialist "son of a bitch". He used to carry a chainsaw in a symbol of his planned cuts but shelved it in recent weeks to help boost his moderate image.

After October's first-round vote, Milei struck an uneasy alliance with the conservatives, which boosted his support. But he faces a highly fragmented Congress, with no single bloc having a majority, meaning that he will need to get backing from other factions to push through legislation. Milei's coalition also does not have any regional governors or mayors.

That may temper some of his more radical proposals. Long-suffering voters are likely to have little patience, and the threat of social unrest is never far below the surface.

His backers say only he can uproot the political status quo and economic malaise that has dogged South America's second-largest economy for years.

"Milei is the only viable option so we do not end up in misery," said Santiago Neria, a 34-year-old accountant.

[protoslacker]

Capitalism’s devaluation of nature and human health in poorer countries is not a bug, a dodgy line of code messing up the programming. It is a feature. Seeing lithium or cobalt batteries as an easy-fix rests on not seeing and not valuing many peoples and places. It also rests — although many would not admit it — on continuing to make development a rare privilege, suitable only for an elite of the world’s population.

Max Ajl in Resillience. Clean Tech Versus a People’s Green New Deal

By Max Ajl, originally published by Earth Island Journal

A People's Green New Deal

[table-cat-games]

All right everyone this is the final (I think) update post for the Haslab proton pack. For the first part of this post check out this link.

I completed all the cosmetic mods that I'm comfortable with making for right now after doing the internal mods.

You can compare and contrast what the original model looks like (right) versus mine (left).

The yellow/black electrical sleeve made a hell of a difference. And I'm really glad I did the fake wire thing here. I also added a real clamp for the wires.

And one of the most annoying mods was cleaning up the ribbon cable which was absolutely filthy before. Now it's just regular dirty.

Some more fake wires I added and you could see a couple of the painted connectors. They don't look exactly real to me, but they look a lot better than they did when they were just black rubber.

Here's another painted piece with the gold/copper connector along with some real hose clamps I put over some electrical tape.

Here's the list of everything I did to it:

Keep alive kit so it doesn't turn itself off.

Lithium battery swap.

Power cell light cover change.

Attached to alice frame

Painted connectors.

Removed fake rubber tape on wand handle and replace it with hockey tape.

Painted wand tip silver

Removed fake copper wires

Real electrical tape applied throughout.

Added some stickers

Swapped the yellow cable sleeve.

[materialsscienceandengineering]

Periodic Table Championship: Round 1, Day 3, Lithium vs. Moscovium

The third day of round 1 matches starts us off with element 3, lithium, versus element 115, moscovium. Let's introduce our competitors:

Lithium is the first metallic element on the periodic table, the least dense metal, and the least dense solid element. It is an alkali metal and shares the groups extreme reactivity, needing to be stored in an inert atmosphere or liquid. The most well known application of this metal is perhaps in batteries, but it is also used in glass, ceramics, and alloying. Lithium is named for the Greek word meaning stone.

Moscovium is an extremely radioactive synthetic element, with its most stable isotope having a half-life of only 0.65 seconds. It is thought to be a post-transition metal, but given that only about a hundred atoms of the element have been observed most properties of moscovium have yet to be confirmed experimentally. It is named after the Moscow Oblast, where it was first created by a joint team of Russian and American scientists.

[justbeingnamaste]

The New York Fire Department recently reported that so far this year there have been 108 lithium-ion battery fires in New York City, which have injured 66 people and killed 13. According to FDNY Commissioner Laura Kavanagh, “There is not a small amount of fire, it (the vehicle) literally explodes.” The resulting fire is “very difficult to extinguish and so it is particularly dangerous.”

Last year there were more than 200 fires from batteries from e-bikes, EVs, and other devices.

A fire ignited at an e-bike shop and killed four people near midnight on the morning of June 20. Two individuals were left in critical condition. The fire commissioner has warned New Yorkers that such devices could be very dangerous and typically explode in such a way that renders escape impossible.

FDNY also reports that in just three years, lithium-ion battery fires have surpassed those started by cooking and smoking as the most common causes of fatal fires in New York City. It’s happening all over the country as these blazes have become commonplace. Cars and e-bikes are randomly blowing up in driveways and garages.

Now let’s be honest: 13 deaths in a city the size of New York with some 8 million people is hardly an epidemic. Regulations should always be based on a cost versus benefit calculation, or there would be no cars at all.

And yet the same scaremongers on the left who have zero tolerance and want bans for small risks when it comes to everything from swimming pool diving boards, gas stoves, plastic straws, vaping, fireworks, and so on, have a surprisingly high pain threshold when it comes to people dying or suffering critical injured from ��green” electric battery fires.

Or consider this: In 1965, Ralph Nader almost single-handedly helped ban the popular Chevrolet Corvair—famous for its engine placed in the back trunk of the car. Nader’s bestselling shock book “Unsafe at Any Speed” declared the car was deadly. But there was no real evidence of that claim, and to this day there are no reliable statistics on how many passengers—if any—died in Corvairs from rear-end accidents.

What is indisputable is that EVs will cause far more deaths than Corvairs ever did.......

....All this is especially hypocritical because once upon a time the left’s mantra was “no trading blood for oil.” Now they are willing to trade blood in exchange for getting Americans to stop using oil. An irony of all this is that because of all the energy needed to produce windmills, solar panels, and electric batteries, new studies are showing that the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions to this “net zero” transition is close to zero. It turns out, green energy causes some pollution, too.....

[givemeanaccountalready]

My favorite chemical test is the flame test because if it’s not sodium, there’s a chance of a really cool flame!

Potassium is a nice violet. I believe strontium burns a nice, lightsaber red. Lithium also burns red but if I remember right it is a pinker shade of red. Copper is green and so is barium. I believe that they’re different shades. Sodium burns orange, which is why I find it boring.

It’s all because of the electrons of these metals! They jump up to the first excited state because of the heat from the Bunsen burner’s flame, and then they drop back down to the ground state. To drop down, they release energy as a form of light and that’s what we see in the form of flame color. The color variation is because different metals have different energy differences between their ground and excited states, and the energy of the photon is indirectly proportional to the wavelength, which determines color. Colors on the (ROYGBIV) visible light spectrum that are closer to red light end of the spectrum have lower energy and longer wavelengths than a color closer to the violet light end of the spectrum, which has higher energy but smaller wavelengths.

If I recall correctly, molecules can rotate and even change their polarization because of microwave and infrared light, but it’s not until visible light and beyond that their electrons can reach excited states. I believe that the particle nature of electrons, (like light, electrons are both particles and waves), is what makes it stepwise, not a smooth upturn for absorbing energy. I should be in bed asleep for work but here I am geeking out. The stepwise versus smooth absorption is something you learn in general chemistry so I should know it but I tired, ok?

Night night sleep tight

[golfcartlithiumbattery]

Golf Cart Battery Costs: A Guide to Choosing the Right Battery

Below is a detailed analysis comparing the cost and performance aspects of golf cart batteries, focusing on lead-acid versus lithium batteries.

1. Lead-Acid Battery Cost

Initial Purchase Cost: Lead-acid batteries are generally inexpensive upfront, making the initial investment relatively low.

Replacement Frequency: Despite their lower purchase price, lead-acid batteries have a shorter lifespan (typically around 3–5 years) and may require more frequent replacement, which can drive up long-term costs.

2. Lithium Battery Cost

Initial Investment: Lithium batteries come with a higher price tag — often 3 to 5 times the cost of lead-acid batteries. This results in a higher upfront cost.

Long-Term Value: Lithium batteries generally offer a longer service life (commonly 8–10 years or more) and can endure more charging cycles, which may lead to lower overall costs over time.

3. Ease of Use

Lead-Acid Batteries: These require regular maintenance, including checking electrolyte levels, cleaning terminals, and ensuring proper charging. This can be time-consuming and cumbersome.

Lithium Batteries: Lithium batteries are nearly maintenance-free. They come with built-in management systems, charge faster, and are generally safer, offering a more convenient user experience.

4. Performance Comparison

Lead-Acid Batteries: They provide a steady power output but tend to be heavy with lower energy density. In scenarios requiring high performance, such as rapid acceleration or long-range use, they may fall short.

Lithium Batteries: With a higher energy density and better power output, lithium batteries are lighter and deliver superior performance. This makes them well-suited for applications demanding extended range and high efficiency.

5. Lifespan

Lead-Acid Batteries: Typically, their lifespan is around 3–5 years, and deep discharges can further reduce their longevity.

Lithium Batteries: Lithium batteries tend to last longer, often reaching 8–10 years, and can maintain performance across a greater number of charge-discharge cycles.

6. Maintenance Comparison

Lead-Acid Batteries: They require regular maintenance such as water topping, electrolyte checks, and terminal cleaning. Inadequate maintenance can impact both performance and lifespan.

Lithium Batteries: With minimal maintenance needs, lithium batteries help reduce ongoing labor and costs related to upkeep.

7. Final Cost Analysis

Short-Term Costs: Lead-acid batteries, due to their lower initial cost, might be a more economical choice for short-term use or when working within a tight budget.

Long-Term Investment: Although lithium batteries have a higher upfront cost, their extended lifespan, lower maintenance requirements, and enhanced performance can lead to a lower overall cost when considered over time.

Conclusion: The decision between lead-acid and lithium batteries for golf carts should be based on your specific needs:

Budget Constraints & Short-Term Use: If you are working within a limited budget or do not plan on long-term usage, lead-acid batteries may be the more cost-effective option.

Performance & Long-Term Efficiency: If you prioritize higher performance, longer lifespan, and lower maintenance efforts, investing in lithium batteries might be more beneficial in the long run.

This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the trade-offs involved, allowing you to make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.

[lithionpower]

Revolutionizing Battery Management for Electric Mobility

The rise of electric mobility is transforming how we move, work, and live. From electric vehicles (EVs) zipping through city streets to e-bikes powering last-mile commutes, the shift toward sustainable transportation is undeniable. At the heart of this revolution lies a critical component: the battery. As the lifeblood of electric mobility, batteries determine range, performance, and longevity—but they’re also the bottleneck. Enter the next frontier: revolutionizing battery management systems (BMS) to unlock the full potential of electric mobility.

The Battery Challenge

Batteries, particularly lithium-ion ones, are marvels of modern engineering. They store energy efficiently and power everything from sleek Teslas to warehouse robots. Yet, they come with challenges. Overcharging, overheating, and uneven cell degradation can shorten their lifespan, reduce efficiency, and, in rare cases, lead to safety hazards. For electric mobility to scale—whether for personal EVs, fleet vehicles, or micromobility solutions—these issues must be addressed head-on.

Traditional battery management systems monitor voltage, temperature, and charge levels to keep things running smoothly. But as the demand for longer range, faster charging, and greener solutions grows, these legacy systems are showing their limits. The future of electric mobility hinges on smarter, more adaptive battery management.

The Next Generation of Battery Management

So, what does “revolutionizing” battery management look like? It’s a blend of cutting-edge technology, data-driven insights, and forward-thinking design. Here are the key innovations driving this transformation:

AI-Powered Optimization Artificial intelligence is stepping in to make BMS smarter. By analyzing real-time data—think cell health, driving patterns, and environmental conditions—AI can predict and adjust battery performance dynamically. This means less wear, better efficiency, and a longer lifespan. Imagine an EV that learns your commute and optimizes energy use to squeeze out an extra few miles.

Advanced Cell Balancing Not all battery cells age equally. Some degrade faster due to manufacturing variances or usage patterns, dragging down overall performance. Next-gen BMS uses sophisticated algorithms to redistribute energy across cells, ensuring uniform wear and maximizing capacity. This could mean the difference between a battery lasting five years versus ten.

Thermal Management Breakthroughs Heat is a battery’s worst enemy. Innovative cooling systems—like liquid cooling or phase-change materials—are being integrated into BMS to keep temperatures in check. This not only boosts safety but also enables faster charging without compromising longevity. Picture plugging in your EV and hitting 80% charge in 15 minutes, stress-free.

Wireless and Cloud Connectivity Modern BMS isn’t just about what’s under the hood—it’s connected. Wireless diagnostics and cloud-based monitoring allow manufacturers and users to track battery health remotely. Got a fleet of delivery vans? A centralized system could flag a struggling battery before it fails, minimizing downtime and costs.

Sustainability Through Second-Life Applications What happens when an EV battery reaches the end of its road-worthy life? A revolutionized BMS can assess remaining capacity and repurpose it for less demanding roles—like grid storage or powering homes. This circular approach reduces waste and aligns electric mobility with a greener future.

Why It Matters

The stakes are high. By 2030, global EV sales are projected to soar, with millions of batteries hitting the streets. A robust BMS isn’t just a technical upgrade—it’s a game-changer for affordability, reliability, and environmental impact. Consumers get longer-lasting vehicles with fewer repair headaches. Businesses gain efficient fleets that don’t break the bank. And the planet benefits from reduced emissions and smarter resource use.

Take micromobility as an example. Electric scooters and bikes are flooding urban landscapes, but their batteries often falter under heavy use. A revolutionized BMS could extend their range and durability, making them a viable alternative to cars for short trips—and easing traffic congestion in the process.

The Road Ahead

We’re already seeing pioneers push the envelope. Companies like Tesla and Rivian embed sophisticated BMS into their vehicles, while startups explore modular designs for swappable batteries. Research into solid-state batteries promises even greater leaps, with BMS evolving to handle higher energy densities and faster charge cycles.

But challenges remain. Scaling these innovations requires investment, standardization, and collaboration across industries. Governments can help by incentivizing R&D, while manufacturers must prioritize open-source frameworks to avoid a fragmented ecosystem.

Conclusion

Battery management isn’t the flashiest part of electric mobility, but it’s the unsung hero. Revolutionizing it means more than tweaking a few algorithms—it’s about reimagining how we power the future. As AI, connectivity, and sustainable design converge, BMS is poised to drive electric mobility further, faster, and greener than ever before. The road to a fully electrified world starts here—one optimized battery at a time. For more information battery management system for electric vehicle

[newspagesonline]

Elevation Lab TimeCapsule 10-Year Battery Case review: Everlasting AirTag life

Macworld At a glanceExpert’s Rating Pros Estimated 10-year lifespan versus 6 to 12 months for an AirTag-compatible lithium coin battery Waterproof against steam cleaning and high-pressure jets (IP69) Low cost relative to standard rugged waterproof AirTag cases Uses standard AA batteries Screws use standard hex-head style (hex wrench included) Cons Larger form factor compared to…

[chroniclesofschool]

Rookie Student: Trials & Tribulations

A Math 3 Blog Regarding What Happened this 2nd Quarter by Ryxell Gaea M. Bravo of 9 - Lithium

⋆⁺｡˚⋆˙‧₊☽ ◯ ☾₊‧˙⋆˚｡⁺⋆

Functions line the board, a language I can barely comprehend unfolds before my eyes as I stare at the scribbled over pages of my notebook, failed attempts and the weight of stupidity starting to sink into my shoulders as the rest of my classmates stand to bid the teacher goodbye.

“What do I do?” I asked myself after the ordeal I had just experienced. My gaze shifts to my friends, taking in how easily they absorb the new lesson while I sit here and start putting the lesson in the back of my mind out of fear and self-defense, if I may put it.

a. How would you describe your Math 3 second quarter learning journey? This scenario describes what mainly plays out every time Math comes up: nerve-wracking and desolate.

Though of course, nothing stays the same forever.

I usually find it in myself to finally start grasping the concept when I really should have mastered it by now, say for example, quizzes, seat works, and most of all, exams. Reflecting on what I usually do when it comes to problems like these, it never resurfaces unless I’m forced to face it head on. Perhaps it’s because I’m caught in the stress filled tides of my own making (only starting on submissions the night or hour before they are due) or it’s because I tend to distract myself to get away from my responsibilities that I don’t prioritize my genuine academic learning over what gives me dopamine. I know I shouldn’t be saying this as a scholar, but this is honestly been feeling for every subject that isn’t HUMSS oriented.

By God’s miracle, I’m still in this school, and am still experiencing Math 3. This brings me to my next point of discussion which is consulting help from my friends. I plan to finally consult my tutor by this quarter and fix myself up (hopefully) before the next round of exams. To be honest, if they weren’t there I might have been kicked out by now.

b. Which topic did you find most enjoyable? What made it enjoyable for you? Provide clear images of your solutions to sample problems or exercises on the topic.

Surprisingly, I had a few topics I enjoyed such as solving for the inverse of functions (note that this doesn’t include finding the domain and range, which I’ll get to later), floor, and ceiling functions. Inverse is just messing around with the function until it comes out right (in my experience at least). Below is the initial computations I made during the seat work we had before our exams.

Inverse Functions (ceiling & floor is further down):

c. What concepts did you find easy to learn? What do you think made them easy for you? Floor and ceiling functions only requires you to round up and round down the function respectively, which is why I found them relatively easy. Below are examples.

Ceiling and Floor Functions:

d. What concepts did you find most interesting/inspiring? Why do you think so? To be honest, I didn’t necessarily find any topic interesting nor inspiring. However, if I were to mention a topic that ‘amused’ me in a sense, it would be dividing polynomials!! That part was fun.

Most of my interests and inspirations come from something I can relate to or understand well, and math doesn’t fall into either of these categories, unfortunately. I could change that, yes, but the dedication that’ll take will test my perseverance, consistency, and my motivation to keep pushing myself to continue because it will benefit myself in the long run, and that’s something I’m yet to be sure of and slightly concerned about. My experience with perseverance isn’t the best. As a writer whose only motivation is to get my ideas out there, even I haven’t finished one of my ideas although I went through lengths such as logging when I write, my word count for the day versus my target, and the thought that “no one will read, so why continue”? Though connecting this to math and to one of the topic’s I genuinely enjoyed, it reminds me that not every turn nor topic I have to tackle is always dark and dreary, but rather it truly is a test of perseverance to see the light at the end of the tunnel (understanding and being able to solve problems).

e. What concepts have you mastered most? Why do you think so? Provide clear images of your solutions to sample problems or exercises on the topic.

I’d like to think the concepts I’ve mastered most are dividing polynomials and the floor and ceiling functions. Dividing polynomials is merely dividing, though it is often used as a leeway into solving other complex problems in which I start to lose understanding in. Same goes for floor and ceiling functions. An honorable mention would be finding the inverse functions, though I can not (for the life of me) find its domain and range and properly graph it out.

Below are my solutions to sample problems or exercises of it:

Dividing Polynomials:

f. What concepts have you mastered the least? Why do you think so? Provide clear images of your solutions to sample problems or exercises on the topic.

Possibly every other topic I haven’t mentioned already. Majority of the theorems from the first half of the quarter, how to get the domain and range of inverse functions and transformations of functions.

Mixture of Descartes' Rule of Signs, Rational Root Theorem, Synthetic & Long Division of Polynomials:

Transformations of Functions:

g. What quick notes do you have for: i. your teacher; Sir Joseph!! You’re so cool po, your mastery of math as a whole shines through your discussion, though I’m afraid the knowledge you’re providing us with doesn’t fully register in my brain sometimes. (IT’S A ME PROBLEM PO HUHU 🥹)

ii. your classmates; and They’re very cool and smart. I’m very thankful they’re willing to help me out when I need it.

iii. yourself? I need to get myself together sooner than later because I know fully well I’m gonna crumble if I keep living like “this”: always rushing to beat deadlines, accepting the consequences of late submissions due to procrastination, and forgetting to revise on topics I don’t know out of fear.

IN A NUTSHELL:

me most of the time in math: that one time i get the lesson:

Adding Kazuma Asogi as well bc he's my stress reliever 🥹

~ FIN ~

[table-cat-games]

I know you're excited for another Ghostbusters proton pack post! I believe I finished with proton pack number #3, which is a spirit Halloween pack that is about 80% the size of a "real life" one.

"Why do you have this?" you ask after I posted that I have a Haslab pack that I did work on recently. There's a couple reasons. The first is that the Haslab kit is heavier by about 5 pounds and I want something to wear if I'm walking around and getting hot. Also, now I have a pack that I can loan out to either my significant other or a friend if they wanted to Ghostbust with me. Finally, the Haslab pack doesn't have as much interactivity as this one does with the electronics.

You see, I put in a lot of bells and whistles with this one. I installed lights, sounds, and did a fair number of cosmetic upgrades.

First up is the Alice frame which is always a must for a proton pack. I also remove the cardboard motherboard (the backing part) and replace it with a wood motherboard from Frankenlabs. Finally I put some gaffers tape around the foam padding stuff.

I got this copper ion arm from Etsy and added it to the pack and I think it really brings a lot to it.

Here you can see some of the weathering I did which is pretty okay, but not perfect.

Also notice that the cyclotron cover (the big round circle thing that covers those lights up) is a 3D printed kit to beef it up a little bit.

Here you can compare and contrast my version versus a out of the box one.

And here's a video of me going through the firing modes.

List of everything I did to this pack:

Replaced wand with Hasbro Spangler wand.

Cut off the fake tape on the Spangler wand replaced it with hockey tape also put hockey tape around the front grip.

Added V Hook on pack (connector for Spangler wand)

Sound kit/electronics kit to connect Spangler want to the pack.

An electronics kit inside the pack to replace the lights and add sounds.

Added a rechargeable lithium ion battery.

Metal ion arm

Cyclotron cover

New ribbon cable

Weathering

Added stickers, some more electrical tape and a couple of added wires

New motherboard

Alice frame

[materialsscienceandengineering]

Periodic Table Championship: Round 4, Day 1, Lithium vs. Sodium

Match 3 of 8 from round 4 pits the last two alkali metals against each other, lithium versus sodium.

Fun facts:

Lithium isotopes (lithium-6, primarily) are used to create the rarer hydrogen isotope, tritium, in nuclear reactors.

Sodium occurs in mineral form, thanks to its reactivity, the most well known of which is sodium chloride. In mineral form, the compound is known as halite, or rock salt, and can be found all over the world, typically in locations of dried up lake beds and seas.

[dorleco]

FCEVs or BEVs-The Future of Mobility

Introduction

The depletion of fossil fuel reserves and its adverse impacts on the environment have emerged as major catalysts for innovation as manufacturers increasingly rely on alternative energy sources to power their vehicles. Both battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are among the most promising options for environmentally friendly transportation. These two technologies seek to meet the increasing demands for mobility, increase efficiency, and solve sustainability issues. However, considering issues like limited lithium sources and developing fuel cell capabilities, there is still disagreement about which of these technologies should be prioritized.

This blog examines the FCEVs or BEVs controversy, weighs the benefits of each, and predicts which technology will likely rule certain areas of the transportation industry.

The Connection between FCEVs or BEVs

The idea that fuel cells and lithium-ion batteries are competing technologies is a prevalent misunderstanding in the FCEVs or BEVs debate. In actuality, these two systems work well together and provide a range of answers to the efficiency and sustainability issues the automobile sector faces. The future of transportation will probably be defined by the coexistence of these two technologies, which are essential parts of electric mobility solutions.

BEVs require lithium-ion batteries, but fuel cells work by a chemical redox reaction in which hydrogen combines with oxygen to create water and energy. Fuel cells are becoming a serious option, especially for applications that call for lighter powertrains and greater range. Battery and fuel cell technologies will work in tandem to solve certain mobility issues rather than taking the place of one another.

Current Issues in the Market

Range and payload capacity are two of the most important issues when it comes to sustainable mobility, especially in the heavy-duty transportation industry. The normal range of conventional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) on a single fuel tank is 400 miles, which is a common benchmark for efficiency.

However, this range requirement has not yet been fully met by FCEVs or BEVs, particularly when significant payloads are involved:

Limitations of the battery:

Because BEV batteries are often heavy, the vehicle’s load and, thus, its energy usage are increased.

For example, the Hummer EV’s battery weighs nearly as much as a small car like the Honda Civic. Such a big battery weight reduces cargo capacity and energy efficiency.

The Emergence of Fuel Cell Technology:

Although they are still in their infancy, fuel cell systems provide lighter powertrains and a higher energy density.

Infrastructure, storage, and manufacturing of hydrogen are very expensive and undeveloped.

Because laws frequently regulate the maximum axle weight, these trade-offs become crucial in heavy-duty applications. To comply with weight regulations, designers are compelled to decrease battery size, which consequently diminishes range. Because of this restriction, automakers are now concentrating on BEV economy versus performance trade-offs.

FCEVs or BEVs: A Comparative Overview

To better understand the strengths and weaknesses of each technology, the following table summarizes key performance factors:

CriteriaFCEVs (Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles)BEVs (Battery Electric Vehicles)RangeLonger range; ideal for heavy-duty applicationsLimited range, especially for heavy loadsRefueling/Charging TimeQuick refueling (5–10 minutes)Longer charging times (30 minutes — 2 hours)Energy DensityHigh energy density; lightweight powertrainLower energy density; heavier battery weightInfrastructureLimited hydrogen fuelling infrastructureThe growing network of charging stationsCostExpensive due to hydrogen production & storageRelatively lower, but battery costs are highDynamic PerformanceLess dynamic; ideal for static energy supplyExcellent dynamic performanceApplicationsBest for long-distance and heavy-duty transportIdeal for short-range, light-duty vehiclesEnvironmental ImpactEmissions-free but energy-intensive hydrogen productionEmissions-free but lithium mining is resource-intensive

2. Payload and Range

Payload capacity and range are important considerations in long-distance and commercial transportation. In this regard, FCEVs are superior because:

The lighter weight of the fuel cell powertrain allows for a higher carrying capacity.

Greater range is made possible by FCEVs’ increased energy storage capacity without significantly increasing vehicle weight.

The weight of high-capacity batteries, on the other hand, limits the payload and range of BEVs. Because of this trade-off, FCEVs are a more desirable option for heavy-duty commercial vehicles, logistics, and long-distance transportation.

3. Infrastructure and Cost

The high expense of producing, storing, and developing infrastructure for hydrogen poses a barrier to the broad adoption of FCEVs. The infrastructure for hydrogen refueling stations is still lacking, and producing hydrogen fuel requires a lot of energy.

BEVs, on the other hand, profit from a growing network of EV charging stations and continuous improvements in battery technology, which are bringing down prices over time. However, a long-term issue with BEV scalability is the limited availability of lithium.

Which Technology Is Better, FCEVs or BEVs?

Instead of considering FCEVs or BEVs as rival technologies, the discussion should focus on determining which option best meets a particular set of transportation requirements:

For short-distance passenger travel and urban transit, battery electric vehicles, or BEVs, are perfect.

Heavy-duty and long-distance applications, where rapid recharging, extended range, and high payload capacity are essential, are ideal for Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs).

While BEVs are more appropriate for private automobiles, taxis, and smaller delivery vehicles, FCEVs are especially attractive for commercial vehicles, buses, and trucks. When combined, these technologies can meet the many needs for environmentally friendly transportation.

Dorleco’s BEV and FCEV Development Initiatives

At Dorleco, we acknowledge the significance of both BEVs and FCEVs influencing the direction of transportation in the future. Our development work is concentrated on producing reliable software for fuel cell and battery systems, such as:

Balanced Cell Algorithms

employ sophisticated balancing procedures to maximize battery longevity and performance.

Estimating SOC using Kalman Filters

For dependable energy management, an accurate State of Charge (SOC) estimate is essential.

Control and Thermal Modelling

Ensuring effective fuel cell and battery heat management.

Integration of Fuel Cell Controller and BMS Controller

CAN architecture integration for smooth performance and communication.

Validation and Verification of Batteries

Carrying out thorough testing on charging and discharging to confirm the dependability and effectiveness of the system.

Quick Control Prototyping

Use raptured tools to design systems and prototypes quickly.

At Dorleco, our team is committed to developing both technologies to satisfy changing consumer needs and environmental objectives. We provide specialized solutions that support both BEVs and FCEVs by fusing our knowledge of software development and system modeling.

Contact us at info@dorleco.com for additional details on our EV software services and VCU products, CAN Keypads, and CAN Displays. Let us assist you in reaching your objectives for sustainable mobility.

Conclusion

Two different but complementary strategies for sustainable mobility are highlighted by the FCEVs or BEVs discussion. FCEVs are viable options for heavy-duty and long-distance transportation, whereas BEVs are expected to rule light-duty and urban applications. Automakers can solve present issues and quicken the shift to a cleaner, more efficient future by utilizing the advantages of both technologies.

Our goal at Dorleco is to use cutting-edge software development and system integration to propel innovation in FCEV and BEV solutions. By working together, we can use efficient and sustainable technology to influence how people move in the future.