#valid SCCs

[michellesanches]

Data transfers based on the old EU SCC’s must be replaced before 21 March 2024

In February 2022, the UK introduced the International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA) and the UK Addendum to the European Commission’s new standard contractual clauses (new EU SCCs). These documents, essential for data protection in the post-Brexit era, are designed to ensure that personal data transfers from the UK to countries not covered by the UK’s adequacy regulations comply with the UK…

[worstutcanonthingpoll]

We finally have our bracket !!

Rounds 1 & 2 will be under the cut, open for more !

There is a mention of abuse in one of the entries , beware.

Round One (1)

Glyde V.S Pyrope's Orange Attacks

Glyde: Impossible to spawn and even harder to fight,

Pyrope's Orange Attacks: Submitter , in their words , has a tiny ass laptop and rarely succeeds in moving when hitting them.

Genocide Grind V.S RUINs Encounter Rate

Genocide Grind: Takes days (exaggerating) to do.

RUINs Encounter Rate: You can't walk five steps without getting attacked.

Lesser Dog Slander V.S Sliding Ice Puzzle

Lesser Dog Slander: "The Red Bird NPC in Grillby's comments on the disappearance of the Dogs, even if Lesser Dog is still alive. Interestingly, Lesser Dog is never mentioned by the other guard dogs. Killing it provokes no reaction from the other dogs at Grillby's. In turn, if Lesser Dog is the only guard dog left, how it acts at Grillby's does not change."

Sliding Ice Puzzle: Tiny snow hat is rewarding, not worth the effort of doing that puzzle several times if you mess up.

Cap'n (SCC) V.S Your Choices Don't Matter

Cap'n (SCC): They thought he was creepy to the girls. I'm gonna be honest, do not vote Cap'n. I want him to lose this, he's a good character. My man was trying too hard to seem straight, let him be.

Your Choices Don't Matter: Vote this! It's very limiting in contrast to Undertale's "your every choice matters" bit.

Mean Chara V.S Cop Undyne

Mean Chara: The triggering topic I was talking about. This had second most submissions next to Cop Undyne, it's the theory that Chara was abusive towards Asriel when they were alive.

Cop Undyne: ACAB.

Not Enough Amalgamates V.S True Lab's Green Key Scene.

Not Enough Amalgamates: They're cool, someone wanted more of them.

True Lab's Green Key Scene: A nine year old somewhere was scarred by it, it is kinda creepy though.

No Running Ability V.S Ambiguous Skeleton Ages

No Running Ability: Frisk walks so slowly, why?

Ambiguous Skeleton Ages: Sans is older, Papyrus is younger, we know that. But how old? Is Papyrus 19, or is he 32?

Megalovania (UT Version) V.S Homestuck References

Megalovania (UT Version): Submitter thinks it's the worst version of Megalovania.

Homestuck References: The one in MTT Resort specifically, quoting the submission; "Get jade harley outta there !!! Not her natural habitat.........".

Round Two (2)

"I Already Befriended Your Mom Last Night." V.S "I Befriended Him Too."

"I Already Befriended Your Mom Last Night": Weird to make your mom jokes to kids you just met, submitter says (valid, honestly).

"I Befriended Him Too.": Sans fucked both Kris' parents, oh no. Was added by the group to even the numbers out.

Aaron Being Creepy To Frisk V.S Date Stuff

Aaron Being Creepy To Frisk: Submitter says that everyone else can recognise Frisk as a child, so why is Aaron flirting with them?

Date Stuff: Kinda weird to invite a kid to so many dates, sometimes just to threaten their life.

Lightners & Darkners Connotations V.S Frisk's Asian Stereotypes Connotations

Lightners & Darkners Connotations: "Darkners' purpose is to to serve Lightners" has some unfortunate connotations when you think about it.

Frisk's Asian Stereotypes Connotations: Frisk has yellow skin and narrow eyes, not the best design choices in hindsight.

Flowey's Characterization V.S Mew Mew's Fight Being Switch Exclusive

Flowey's Characterization: Submitter thinks he's heavily (presumably overly) villainized considering he's a child in a self-made genocidal loop.

Mew Mew's Fight Being Switch Exclusive: Give us our transfemme catgirl fight everywhere else >:( (Added by the group to even the numbers out).

Asgore 'Willingly' Murders Six Kids V.S Papyrus Death

Asgore 'Willingly' Murders Six Kids: Honestly they wrote a whole essay that I can't bother to paste here. In summary, what Toriel said in the stuff pre-Asriel's fight.

Papyrus Death: Why does he still believe in us? Why does he still have faith? Why does he think we can be a better person, if we just tried?

Alphys Enjoys Mew Mew 2 In Deltarune V.S Sans Emits Slime

Alphys Enjoys Mew Mew 2 In Deltarune: What the hell is this imposter.

Sans Emits Slime: "THESE SNAILS ARE JUST LIKE MY BROTHER. ROUND, SLOW... AND CONSTANTLY EMITTING SLIME???"

Lemon Bread (Shyra) Disguises As A Save Point V.S Asgore Dies In All Neutral Endings

Lemon Bread (Shyra) Disguises As A Save Point: Submitter was pissed off on their first playthrough.

Asgore Dies In All Neutral Endings: His whole speech about being a family, his actions in a repeat neutral. It's heartbreaking, hard to not mourn for what we could've had.

Kralsei's Weird Incest Undertones V.S Toby Never Explicitly States Nonbinary-ness Of Characters

Kralsei's Weird Incest Undertones: Obviously, kralsei isn't canon but it is implied that Ralsei has a crush on Kris or the player. He is very similar to Asriel, making it honestly weird.

Toby Never Explicitly States Nonbinary-ness Of Characters: He re-published his whole book because he accidentally misgendered his characters, goes out of his way to correct people, and to use the right pronouns. So why not just say it's canon when it so clearly is?

[cynicwriter]

B. K. Pavithra v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 694 

📢 Hey Tumblr peeps! Let's talk about an important legal development in India 🇮🇳 concerning reservation policies and consequential seniority for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

🔎 So, there was this case that challenged the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservation (to the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act 2018. The Act basically ensures that SCs and STs promoted under the state's reservation policy since 1978 get their fair share of seniority. But the petitioners weren't too happy about how the state collected data to justify this Act. 😕

❓ The main issue: Is the 2018 Reservation Act valid, given that a similar 2002 Reservation Act was invalidated?

⚖️ The Supreme Court of India weighed in, and guess what? They said the 2018 Act is constitutionally valid! 🎉 Here's why: the data collected by the State government through the Ratna Committee report can only be scrutinized by the Court to a limited extent. After all, reservation policy is mainly up to the legislative/executive branches, not the judiciary.

💡 Some key takeaways:

1️⃣ The Ratna Prabha Committee was set up to analyze the representation of SCs and STs in the State Civil Services and the impact of reservation on overall administrative efficiency.

2️⃣ The Court found that the state government's opinion on the adequacy of SCs and STs representation is ultimately subjective.

3️⃣ Ultimately, equity, justice, and efficiency are variable factors that can only be identified and measured by the State.

So there you have it, folks! The 2018 Reservation Act has been deemed constitutionally valid, and it's an interesting development in India's ongoing conversation on reservation policies and social justice. 🗣️👥

[legalwires]

Case Study: I.T.C. Limited v. George Joseph Fernandes

“The court upheld the contract’s validity, stating there was no mutual mistake.” Citation: (1989) 2 SCC 1. Date of Judgment: 6th February, 1989 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: G.L. Oza (J), K.N. Saikia (J) Facts The appellant and the respondent entered into an agreement to charter hire the trawlers for a period of two years, subject to approvals from the Chief Controller of Imports &…

[electronalytics]

Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market Trends, Regional Segmented, Outlook & Forecast till 2033

The competitive analysis of the Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market offers a comprehensive examination of key market players. It encompasses detailed company profiles, insights into revenue distribution, innovations within their product portfolios, regional market presence, strategic development plans, pricing strategies, identified target markets, and immediate future initiatives of industry leaders. This section serves as a valuable resource for readers to understand the driving forces behind competition and what strategies can set them apart in capturing new target markets.

Market projections and forecasts are underpinned by extensive primary research, further validated through precise secondary research specific to the Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market. Our research analysts have dedicated substantial time and effort to curate essential industry insights from key industry participants, including Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), top-tier suppliers, distributors, and relevant government entities.

Receive the FREE Sample Report of Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market Research Insights @ https://stringentdatalytics.com/sample-request/aluminum-printed-circuit-boards-market/10245/

Market Segmentations:

Global Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market: By Company • Zhen Ding Tech. Group • Unimicron • DSBJ • Nippon Mektron • Compeq • Tripod • TTM • SCC • Ibiden • Hannstar Board Global Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market: By Type • Universal Aluminum PCB • High Thermal-Conductive PCB • High-Frequency PCB Global Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market: By Application • Lighting Components • Audio Equipment • Computer Components • Power Supply and Switches • Others

Regional Analysis of Global Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market

All the regional segmentation has been studied based on recent and future trends, and the market is forecasted throughout the prediction period. The countries covered in the regional analysis of the Global Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards market report are U.S., Canada, and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K., Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, and Rest of Europe in Europe, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, India, South Korea, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA) as a part of Middle East and Africa (MEA), and Argentina, Brazil, and Rest of South America as part of South America.

Click to Purchase Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards Market Research Report @ https://stringentdatalytics.com/purchase/aluminum-printed-circuit-boards-market/10245/

Key Report Highlights:

Key Market Participants: The report delves into the major stakeholders in the market, encompassing market players, suppliers of raw materials and equipment, end-users, traders, distributors, and more.

Comprehensive Company Profiles: Detailed company profiles are provided, offering insights into various aspects including production capacity, pricing, revenue, costs, gross margin, sales volume, sales revenue, consumption patterns, growth rates, import-export dynamics, supply chains, future strategic plans, and technological advancements. This comprehensive analysis draws from a dataset spanning 12 years and includes forecasts.

Market Growth Drivers: The report extensively examines the factors contributing to market growth, with a specific focus on elucidating the diverse categories of end-users within the market.

Data Segmentation: The data and information are presented in a structured manner, allowing for easy access by market player, geographical region, product type, application, and more. Furthermore, the report can be tailored to accommodate specific research requirements.

SWOT Analysis: A SWOT analysis of the market is included, offering an insightful evaluation of its Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.

Expert Insights: Concluding the report, it features insights and opinions from industry experts, providing valuable perspectives on the market landscape.

Report includes Competitor's Landscape:

➊ Major trends and growth projections by region and country ➋ Key winning strategies followed by the competitors ➌ Who are the key competitors in this industry? ➍ What shall be the potential of this industry over the forecast tenure? ➎ What are the factors propelling the demand for the Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards? ➏ What are the opportunities that shall aid in significant proliferation of the market growth? ➐ What are the regional and country wise regulations that shall either hamper or boost the demand for Aluminum Printed Circuit Boards? ➑ How has the covid-19 impacted the growth of the market? ➒ Has the supply chain disruption caused changes in the entire value chain? Customization of the Report:

This report can be customized to meet the client’s requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@stringentdatalytics.com), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1 346 666 6655 to share your research requirements.

About Stringent Datalytics

Stringent Datalytics offers both custom and syndicated market research reports. Custom market research reports are tailored to a specific client's needs and requirements. These reports provide unique insights into a particular industry or market segment and can help businesses make informed decisions about their strategies and operations.

Syndicated market research reports, on the other hand, are pre-existing reports that are available for purchase by multiple clients. These reports are often produced on a regular basis, such as annually or quarterly, and cover a broad range of industries and market segments. Syndicated reports provide clients with insights into industry trends, market sizes, and competitive landscapes. By offering both custom and syndicated reports, Stringent Datalytics can provide clients with a range of market research solutions that can be customized to their specific needs.

Reach US

Stringent Datalytics

sales@stringentdatalytics.com

+1 346 666 6655

Social Channels:

Linkedin | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

[securitycompliancecorporation]

User Access Review

User Access Review is a critical process ensuring the security of digital assets by regularly assessing and validating user permissions within an organization's systems. At Security Compliance Corp, this protocol is paramount in safeguarding sensitive data and preventing unauthorized access. Through meticulous examination of user credentials, privileges, and activity logs, potential vulnerabilities are identified and mitigated, bolstering overall cybersecurity posture. Our streamlined approach employs cutting-edge technology and industry best practices to conduct thorough evaluations, fostering compliance with regulatory standards and minimizing risks of data breaches. With User Access Review as a cornerstone, Security Compliance Corp fortifies digital infrastructures, empowering clients with robust protection against evolving threats.

[bhattandjoshiassociates-blog]

Gujarat HC : No Contempt Action Against Police Officer Arresting Without Warrant, If Proper Explanation Given To Magistrate

Case Analysis: No Contempt Action Against Police Officer Arresting Without Warrant, If Proper Explanation Given To Magistrate: Gujarat HC Introduction The case of No Contempt Action Against Police Officer Arresting Without Warrant, If Proper Explanation Given To Magistrate: Gujarat HC deals with the question of whether a police officer can be held in contempt of court for arresting an accused without a warrant, without prior notice under Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), if the officer provides a valid explanation before the magistrate. The Hon’ble High Court provides a detailed analysis of the relevant provisions of law and important judgments to arrive at its conclusion. Background of the case The case arose from an application filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971, by the applicants who were arrested by the respondent police officer for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants alleged that the respondent violated the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr., as reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, which required the police to issue a notice under Section 41A CrPC before arresting an accused for offences punishable with imprisonment up to seven years. The applicants sought a court order directing the respondent to rectify the contempt of court and to initiate proceedings against him under the Contempt of Courts Act. Contentions of the parties in Gujarat HC The applicants contended that the respondent did not issue any notice under Section 41A CrPC before arresting them and did not record any reasons for doing so. They argued that this amounted to contempt of court as per the Supreme Court judgment in Arnesh Kumar case, which mandated that the police should follow a checklist and furnish reasons and material to justify the arrest. They also relied on various judgments from other High Courts to support their case. The respondent contended that he had complied with the guidelines of Arnesh Kumar case and had given a valid explanation for arresting the applicants without notice under Section 41A CrPC. He stated that he had mentioned in the checklist that he arrested the applicants to prevent them from committing any further offence of similar nature, as they were running an education/job consultancy firm and had cheated many people by promising them jobs abroad. He also submitted that he had given a copy of the checklist to the magistrate at the time of production of the applicants and that the magistrate had authorized their detention. Decision of the High Court Gujarat HC The High Court held that contempt of court proceedings cannot be initiated against a police officer for arresting an accused without a warrant, without prior notice under Section 41A CrPC, if the officer provides a valid explanation before the magistrate. The High Court observed that Section 41A CrPC does not bar arrest in all cases, but only requires that the police should give notice to appear before them and record reasons for arrest if they fail to comply. The High Court also noted that Section 41(1)(b)(ii) CrPC allows arrest without warrant if it is necessary to prevent such person from committing any further offence. The High Court relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Arnesh Kumar case, which clarified that arrest can be made in cases where there is a possibility of accused absconding or not appearing at trial or tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses or repeating offences. The High Court found that the respondent had given a clear and specific reason for arresting the applicants in the checklist, which was to prevent them from committing any further offence. The High Court also found that the respondent had furnished a copy of the checklist to the magistrate and that the magistrate had authorized their detention after recording reasons. The High Court concluded that the respondent had fully and substantially complied with the condition mentioned as per the statutory provision of CrPC as well as adhered with the directions and guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar case. Therefore, the High Court held that there was no contempt of court on part of the respondent and dismissed the application filed by the applicants. Conclusion In conclusion, the High Court held that no contempt action can be taken against a police officer for arresting an accused without a warrant, without prior notice under Section 41A CrPC, if he provides a proper explanation before the magistrate. The High Court also held that arrest can be made in cases where it is necessary to prevent such person from committing any further offence. The High Court followed and applied the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar case for arrest. References - Case Name: No Contempt Action Against Police Officer Arresting Without Warrant, If Proper Explanation - Given To Magistrate: Gujarat HC - Case Citation: (2023) livelaw.in 238585 HC - Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr. The checklist under Section 41(1)(b)(ii) CrPC can be incorporated as follows: - The police officer should record the reasons for arresting the accused without a warrant in writing and mention them in the checklist. - The police officer should specify which of the following grounds are applicable for the arrest: - To prevent the accused from committing any further offence of similar nature; - To ensure proper investigation of the offence; - To prevent the accused from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear or tampering with such evidence in any manner; - To prevent the accused from making any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer; - To ensure the presence of the accused in the Court whenever required. - The police officer should also state whether he has received credible information that the accused has committed a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years or with death sentence and whether he has reason to believe on the basis of that information that the accused has committed the said offence. - The police officer should give a copy of the checklist to the magistrate at the time of production of the accused and explain why he did not issue a notice under Section 41A CrPC before arresting him. Read the full article

[govindhtech]

Mastering Wazi: Your Guide to Successful Adoption

An overview of the services offered by Wazi

Staying ahead of the curve in today’s fiercely competitive digital market requires the quick development of innovative digital services. But when it comes to fusing contemporary technology with their core systems including Mainframe applications many firms encounter formidable obstacles. Modernizing core enterprise apps on hybrid cloud platforms requires this integration. Remarkably, 33% of developers do not have the required resources or expertise, which makes it difficult for them to produce high-quality goods and services.

Additionally, 36% of developers find it difficult to collaborate with IT Operations, which causes inefficiencies in the development pipeline. To make matters worse, polls indicate time and time again that “testing” is the main reason project timeframes are delayed. To meet these issues and spur business process change, companies such as State Farm and BNP Paribas are standardizing development tools and methodologies across their platforms.

In what ways does Wazi as Service promote modernity?

Among the solutions that are gaining traction in this environment is “Wazi as a Service.” By supporting safe DevSecOps methods, this cloud-native development and testing environment for z/OS apps is transforming the modernization process. It offers on-demand access to z/OS systems with flexible consumption-based pricing. By speeding up release cycles in safe, regulated hybrid cloud environments like IBM Cloud Framework for Financial Services (FS Cloud), it significantly increases developer productivity.

Software quality is improved by shift-left coding techniques, which enable testing to start as early as the code-writing phase. By utilizing the IBM Cloud Security and Compliance Center service, the platform may be automated using a standardized architecture that has been validated for Financial Services (SCC). IBM Z modernization tools include CI/CD pipelines, Wazi Image Builder, Wazi Dev Spaces on OpenShift, z/OS Connect for APIs, zDIH for data integrations, and IBM Watson for generative AI enable innovation at scale.

What are the advantages of using IBM Cloud’s Wazi service?

Wazi as a Service offers a significant speed advantage over emulated x86 machine environments because it runs on IBM LinuxONE, an enterprise-grade Linux server. It is 15 times faster thanks to this special feature, which guarantees quick and effective application development. Wazi also fills in the gaps in the developer experiences on mainframe and distributed systems, making it easier to create hybrid applications with z/OS components.

Through the integration of secure DevOps principles with the strength of the z-Mod stack, a smooth and effective development process is produced. The service may be safely installed on IBM FS Cloud, which has integrated security and compliance capabilities, and enables easy scalability through automation, lowering support and maintenance cost. As a result, data security and regulatory compliance may be guaranteed by developers who design and implement their environments and code with industry-grade requirements in mind.

Furthermore, Wazi VSI on VPC architecture within IBM FS Cloud creates a segregated network to strengthen the perimeter of the cloud infrastructure against security breaches. Secure integration of on-premises core Mainframe applications with cloud services like API Connect, Event Streams, Code Engine, and HPCS encryptions is also made possible by the strong security and compliance controls offered by IBM Cloud services and ISVs verified for financial services.

This shift makes it possible for outdated, dispersed solutions to replace centralized core systems, enabling organizations to remain competitive and adaptable in the current digital environment. All things considered, Wazi as a Service is revolutionary in that it speeds up digital transformation while guaranteeing security, compliance, and a smooth transition between old and new technology.

How does the IBM Cloud Financial Service Framework support solutions for the industry?

The Financial Services IBM Cloud Framework, often known as The sturdy IBM FS Cloud solution was created especially to meet the special requirements of financial institutions. It guarantees regulatory compliance, excellent security, and resilience throughout both the initial deployment phase and continuous operations. By defining a set of standards that all parties must adhere to, this framework streamlines communications between financial institutions and ecosystem partners that offer software or SaaS products.

The main elements of this framework are cloud best practices and an extensive set of control requirements that cover security and regulatory compliance needs. By implementing a shared responsibility model that covers financial institutions, application suppliers, and IBM Cloud, these best practices make sure that everyone contributes to keeping an environment that is safe and compliant.

The IBM Cloud Framework for Financial Services also helps financial organizations comply with the strict security and regulatory standards of the financial sector by offering comprehensive control-by-control implementation assistance and supporting data. Reference architectures are offered to help with the implementation of control needs in order to further improve compliance. The deployment and configuration process can be streamlined by using these architectures as infrastructure as code.

In order to enable stakeholders to effectively monitor compliance, handle problems, and produce proof of compliance, IBM also provides a variety of tools and services, such as the IBM Cloud Security and Compliance Center. In addition, the framework is subject to continuous governance, which guarantees that it stays current and in line with new and developing rules as well as the shifting requirements of public cloud environments and banks. The IBM Cloud Framework for Financial Services is essentially a comprehensive solution that streamlines financial institutions’ relationships with ecosystem partners and enables them to operate securely and in accordance with industry norms.

Discover Wazi as a Service

Wazi as a Service, which operates on the reliable IBM LinuxONE infrastructure, allows for the easy development of hybrid applications by bridging the gap between distributed and mainframe platforms. Businesses can flourish in the digital age thanks to the platform’s scalability, automation, and compliance features, which enable developers to manage the complex web of security and laws.

Businesses may advance into the future of modern, distributed solutions by securely integrating cutting-edge cloud services with their on-premises core systems using Wazi. In conclusion, Wazi as a Service emphasizes the significance of technology in attaining security, compliance, and the peaceful coexistence of historical and contemporary technologies, and serves as an excellent example of how technology may accelerate digital transformation.

Read more on Govindhtech.com

[isocertificationincanada1]

Why is it important to have ISO 9001 Certification in Canada

What Types of Industries have Entitled to ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

ISO 9001 certification in Canada: Some unique industries are eligible for ISO 9001 certification in Canada. This certification can be extraordinarily beneficial for businesses, as it can help to enhance their operations and grow their overall performance. To be eligible for accreditation, agencies must first meet some necessities ISO certification in Canada.

To begin with, agencies have to have a super manipulation device in the region. This gadget needs to meet the requirements of the ISO 9001 famous. Additionally, companies should be able to reveal their determination to fine by imposing and maintaining the system.

Once a business enterprise has met its requirements, it can start the certification method. The first step is to post an application to the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). The CSA will then evaluate the utility and decide whether or not the commercial company is eligible for certification.

If the CSA determines that the commercial enterprise is eligible, they’ll issue a registration certificate. This certificate is valid for three years and wants to be renewed at the end of that period.

Businesses licensed to the ISO 9001 trend can use the certification to illustrate their dedication to first-rate. This can assist in beautifying the popularity and growth of their business company. Certification can also help groups to lessen their charges and enhance their efficiency.

How to obtain ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

There are some steps you want to take to get your ISO 9001 certification in Canada. The first step is to discover a certification body accepted by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC). You can find a listing of typical certifications of our bodies on the SCC internet site.

Once you’ve observed a licensed certification frame, you may need to fill out a software shape and submit it to the certification body. Once your software program has been received, the certification frame will perform an audit of your business enterprise to assess whether or not or no longer or now not you meet the necessities of the ISO 9001 standard.

If the certification frame is glad that you meet the necessities of the ISO 9001 popular, they will trouble you with a certificate of conformity. This certificate is valid for three years and may be renewed every three years.

There are several advantages to having ISO 9001 certification. These include progressed patron pleasure, accelerated overall performance, and decreased expenses. ISO 9001 certification also can offer you an aggressive gain when tendering for logo-spanking new artwork.

What is the approach for ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

You need to take some steps to get your ISO 9001 certification in Canada. The first step is to discover a certification body recognized by the Standards Council. Once you have been given a certification body, you’ll want to create a pleasing management device (QMS) that lives up to the requirements of ISO 9001. Once your QMS is in the vicinity, you could then start the certification manner.

The certification technique begins offevolved with an initial assessment followed by a surveillance audit resource. You may be issued your ISO 9001 certificates if you bypass these audits. Once you’ve got your certificate, you must preserve your QMS and undergo ordinary audits to comply with ISO 9001.

What is the Cost of ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

If you want to get your commercial enterprise ISO 9001 certified, you may question how much an entire lot will cost. In Canada, the charge for ISO 9001 certification can vary depending on several things, including the size and scope of your commercial employer, the number of personnel, and the region of your business employer ISO 27001 certification in Canada.

Generally speaking, the price of ISO 9001 certification in Canada can range from some thousand dollars to tens of hundreds of greenbacks. However, the best fee will depend upon the precise necessities of your enterprise.

An important factor affecting the cost of ISO 9001 certification is the size of your commercial organization. Certification fees are commonly lower for small organizations than for huge organizations. This is because small groups generally have fewer employees and a smaller scope of operations.

Another difficulty that could affect the value of ISO 9001 certification is the variety of personnel. Certification fees are usually lower for corporations with fewer personnel. This is because groups with extra employees commonly have complicated operations and require more training.

The region of your industrial enterprise can also affect the price of ISO 9001 certification. Agencies in faraway areas also can need to pay extra for certificates than companies in city regions. This is because companies in far-flung places typically need to adventure further to satisfy the accreditation of our bodies ISO 14001 certification in Canada.

Overall, the fee for ISO 9001 certification in Canada can vary depending on several things. However, the appropriate price will depend on the precise requirements of your enterprise.

Why Factocert for ISO Certification in Canada

We provide the best ISO consultants in Canada, Who are very knowledgeable and provide the best solution. And to know how to get ISO certification in the . Kindly reach us at https://factocert.com/contact-us/. ISO Certification consultants work according to ISO standards and help organizations implement ISO certification in with proper documentation.

For more information visit: ISO 9001 certification in Canada

Related Article: ISO Consultants in Canada

[isocertificationincanada]

Get your ISO 9001 certification in Canada now!

What Types of Industries have Entitled to ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

ISO Certification in Canada, Some unique industries are eligible for ISO 9001 certification in Canada. This certification can be extraordinarily beneficial for businesses, as it can help to enhance their operations and growth their overall performance. To be eligible for certification, agencies must first meet some necessities.

To begin with, agencies have to have a super manipulation device in the region. This gadget needs to meet the requirements of the ISO 9001 famous. Additionally, companies ought to be able to reveal their determination to fine by imposing and maintaining the system.

Once a business enterprise has met its requirements, it may be able to start the certification method then. The first step is to post an application to the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). The CSA will then evaluate the utility and decide whether or not the commercial company is eligible for certification.

If the CSA determines that the commercial enterprise is eligible, they’ll then issue a certificate of registration. This certificate is valid for three years and wants to be renewed at the cease of that period.

Businesses which is probably licensed to the ISO 9001 trend can use the certification to illustrate their dedication to first-rate. This can assist in beautifying the popularity and growth of their business company. Certification can also assist groups to lessen their charges and enhance their efficiency.

How to obtain ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

There are some steps you want to take to get your ISO 9001 certification in Canada. The first step is to discover a certification body accepted by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC). You can find a listing of typical certifications of our bodies on the SCC internet site.

Once you’ve observed a licensed certification frame, you may need to fill out a software shape and submit it to the certification body. Once your software program has been received, the certification frame will perform an audit of your business enterprise to assess whether or not or no longer or now not you meet the necessities of the ISO 9001 standard.

If the certification frame is glad that you meet the necessities of the ISO 9001 popular, they will trouble you with a certificate of conformity. This certificate is valid for three years and may be renewed every three years.

There are several advantages to having ISO 9001 certification. These include progressed patron pleasure, accelerated overall performance, and decreased expenses. ISO 9001 certification also can offer you an aggressive gain when tendering for logo-spanking new artwork.

What is the approach for ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

There are some steps you need to take at the way to get your ISO 9001 certification in Canada. The first step is to discover a certification body recognized by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC). Once you have been given a certification body, you’ll want to create a pleasing management device (QMS) that lives upto the requirements of ISO 9001. Once your QMS is in the vicinity, you could then start the certification manner.

The certification technique begins offevolved with an initial assessment followed by a surveillance audit resource. You may be issued your ISO 9001 certificates if you bypass these audits. Once you’ve got your certificate, you will need to preserve your QMS and undergo ordinary audits to ensure that you are in compliance with ISO 9001.

What is the Cost of ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

If you want to get your commercial enterprise ISO 9001 certified, you may question how much an entire lot will cost. In Canada, the charge for ISO 9001 certification can range depending on several things, together with the size and scope of your commercial employer, the number of personnel, and the region of your business employer.

Generally speaking, the price of ISO 9001 certification in Canada can range from some thousand dollars to tens of hundreds of greenbacks. However, the best fee will depend upon the precise necessities of your enterprise.

One of the primary factors as a manner to have an impact on the price of ISO 9001 certification is the size of your commercial organization. Certification fees are commonly lower for small organizations than for huge organizations. This is because small groups generally have fewer employees and a smaller scope of operations.

Another difficulty that could affect the value of ISO 9001 certification is the variety of personnel. Certification fees are usually lower for corporations with fewer personnel. This is because groups with extra employees commonly have complicated operations and require more training.

The region of your industrial enterprise also can affect the price of ISO 9001 certification. Agencies in faraway areas also can need to pay extra for certification than companies in city regions. This is because companies in far-flung areas typically need to adventure further to satisfy with certification of our bodies.

Overall, the fee for ISO 9001 certification in Canada can vary depending on several things. However, the appropriate price will depend on the precise requirements of your enterprise.

How can Factocert assist with ISO 9001 Certification in Canada?

If you are trying to get your ISO 9001 certification in Canada, FCATocert can help. We’re a main company of exceptional management certification services, and we can allow you to get the ISO 9001 certification you need if you need to enhance your industrial enterprise and compete within the global market.

The ISO 9001 certification is the global trend for satisfactory control structures. It affords a framework for agencies to observe so that you can ensure they’ll be imparting first-rate products and services to their customers. To be licensed, companies need to undergo an assessment method to ensure they meet the requirements of the ISO 9001 desired.

FCATocert can help you with each step of the ISO 9001 certification approach. We can offer you the sources and aid you want to ensure that you’re meeting all of the requirements for certification. We can also assist you in putting together your certification assessment, and we’re going to be there to assist you each step of the manner.

Getting your ISO 9001 certification may be an exceptional manner to improve your industrial corporation. It assists you in enchanting new clients and companions and can develop an aggressive place inside the global marketplace. FCATocert will let you get the ISO 9001 certification you want to take your enterprise to the subsequent degree.

We provide the best ISO consultants in Canada, Who are very knowledgeable and provide you with the best solution. And to know how to get ISO certification in South Africa?Kindly reach us at contact@factocert.comISO Certification consultants follow the guidelines set by the international organization for standardization and help the organization to implement ISO certification in Canada in an easy way with proper documentation and audit.

For more information visit: ISO 9001 certification in Canada

Related Links:

ISO certification in Canada

ISO 9001 certification in Canada

Certification Consultants in Canada

ISO Consultants in Canada

ISO Auditors in Canada

ISO Certification Bodies in Canada

ISO certification Cost In Canada

[gdprinpractice]

The CJEU Declares the EU-US Privacy Shield Invalid and SCCs Valid

What are the Implications and Next Steps for Your Organisation?

On 16 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) made a significant ruling concerning the adequacy of the EU-US Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses (SCCs), in accordance with GDPR principles. The Privacy Shield was a mechanism that allowed participating companies to comply with EU requirements for transferring personal data to the United States, particularly focusing on data transfer methods, including third-party transfers. Similarly, SCCs could be used to legitimize personal data transfers between the EU, the US, and other third countries by establishing contracts on EU-approved terms, often utilized by small and medium-sized businesses, in accordance with GDPR principles.

Surprising many experts, the CJEU declared the Privacy Shield invalid while confirming the validity of SCCs, albeit with certain conditions. In this context, we present the background leading up to these judgments, provide a high-level summary of the judgments themselves, and outline the potential implications and recommended next steps for organizations in the UK.

What was the Background to these Judgements?

The CJEU judgments that arose from this case are commonly known as 'Schrems II'. In this case, Maximillian Schrems, an Austrian privacy activist, lodged a complaint against the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), which is Ireland's data protection authority. Schrems argued that the United States does not offer adequate security measures and legal remedies to protect the privacy data of individuals in the EU.

Schrems specifically raised concerns about his personal Facebook data, which he claimed was transferred and processed by Facebook Ireland on servers owned by Facebook Inc., based in the US. At that time, these transfers between Facebook Ireland and Facebook Inc. were conducted using the SCCs, which were the applicable standard contractual clauses (although they have since been replaced with updated SCCs that are more in line with the Schrems II judgments).

Schrems contended that the former SCCs did not provide a sufficient level of protection for the personal data of EU individuals due to the intrusive nature of US surveillance activities. He argued that US legislation did not explicitly restrict interference with an individual's right to the protection of their personal data in the same manner as EU data protection laws.

The Irish DPC initiated legal proceedings against Facebook in the Irish High Court, which subsequently referred several questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling. The primary focus of these preliminary questions was the validity of the SCCs, but they also touched upon the EU-US Privacy Shield framework.

The CJEU judgments in the 'Schrems II' case emerged as a result of these proceedings, addressing the concerns raised regarding the validity of the SCCs and the EU-US Privacy Shield framework.

Top of Form

What was the Judgement on SCCs?

The CJEU's judgment on standard contractual clauses (SCCs) determined that they do offer sufficient protection for the transfer of EU personal data to third countries, including the United States. However, the Court emphasized that EU organizations relying on SCCs have an obligation to play an active role in ensuring an 'adequate' level of data protection in the respective third country before any transfer takes place. The CJEU also stated that organizations may implement additional safeguards, beyond what is included in the SCCs themselves, to ensure the adequacy of protection. The specific nature of these additional safeguards was left unspecified by the Court.

Moreover, the responsibilities do not solely lie with the data exporter. According to the CJEU's judgment, third country organizations that import data have an obligation to inform EU data exporters if they are unable to comply with the SCCs. When a data importer cannot comply with the SCCs and no additional safeguards are in place to guarantee the required level of protection, the EU data exporter is required to suspend the data transfer and potentially terminate the contract.

The CJEU also clarified that EU data protection authorities (DPAs) have a duty to take action. The Court emphasized that DPAs are "required to execute their responsibility for ensuring that the GDPR is fully enforced with all due diligence." This includes assessing and, if necessary, suspending or prohibiting transfers of personal data to a third country if the DPAs believe that the SCCs are not being or cannot be complied with, and if they determine that the transfers do not meet the EU's data protection requirements.

Furthermore, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) issued Recommendations in June 2021, which provide guidance on the additional safeguards or measures that organizations can consider implementing. Annex 2 of these Recommendations includes a comprehensive list of possible additional safeguards or measures.

What was the Judgement on the Privacy Shield?

The CJEU determined that the Privacy Shield framework was inadequate and did not provide a level of protection for personal data transferred to the US that is equivalent to the protections mandated by the GDPR and EU law. The decision was primarily based on the intrusive surveillance programs carried out by the US government and intelligence agencies, as permitted by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and Executive Order 12333. These programs allowed for the bulk collection of personal data, extending beyond what is considered "strictly necessary" and thus deemed disproportionate under the GDPR.

Additionally, the CJEU highlighted the lack of effective redress mechanisms available to EU citizens in the US under the Privacy Shield framework. Despite the establishment of the Privacy Shield Ombudsman's office by the European Commission to address this concern, its decisions were not binding on US intelligence services, and doubts were raised regarding its impartiality.

The CJEU's decision reflected the fundamental issues related to both the intrusive nature of US surveillance programs and the lack of adequate redress mechanisms, ultimately leading to the invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework.

What are the Implications and Next Steps for UK Organisations?

REVIEW DATA FLOW

If your organization or any of your third-party suppliers are currently engaged in transferring or providing routine access to personal data processed in the EU to the US under the Privacy Shield framework, it is recommended to conduct a data flow review. This review will help you identify the extent of data being transferred to the US, especially data that may fall under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

It is important to note that the UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has advised that if you are currently utilizing the Privacy Shield framework, you may continue to do so until new guidance is made available. However, it is advised not to initiate new transfers or use the Privacy Shield framework during this interim period. Staying informed about updates and guidance from the ICO is crucial to ensure compliance with data protection requirements.

REVIEW EXISTING SCCS

The CJEU's judgment has broad implications for all transfers of EU personal data to jurisdictions that do not currently have an adequacy decision in place. If your organization relies on the June 2021 standard contractual clauses (SCCs), or plans to do so, for transferring personal data of individuals in the EU to third countries (including the US), it is crucial to review these clauses and ensure their enforceability in the specific third country.

Additionally, it is important to address any potential conflicts that may arise when the destination country's laws are incompatible with the GDPR. Finding appropriate solutions or safeguards to mitigate these conflicts is essential for ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.

Furthermore, staying updated and vigilant regarding any further protection measures or guidance that the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) may introduce regarding the use of SCCs is advisable. Keeping a close eye on any developments in this area will help ensure that your organization remains in line with evolving data protection requirements and best practices.

The effect of Brexit

The Schrems II ruling, delivered in July 2020 during the Brexit transition period, remains part of the "acquis" or common law of the EU, which still applies in the UK. However, as Brexit took place on 1 January 2021, the UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) introduced its own set of Schrems-compatible SCCs called the International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA) in March 2022. British businesses are required to use the IDTA instead of the June 2021 EU SCCs for data transfers outside of the UK that are subject to the UK GDPR, the amended version of the GDPR applicable to the processing of personal data of individuals in the UK.

However, there is a caveat with the IDTA. It is specifically designed for transfers of data originating from the UK and subject to the UK GDPR. If a UK-based exporting organization intends to transfer data that falls under both the unamended EU GDPR (applicable to individuals in the EU) and the UK GDPR, they must use the June 2021 EU SCCs in combination with an additional ICO document called an "Addendum." The Addendum aligns the language of the EU SCCs with UK data protection terminology to ensure compliance with both sets of regulations for transfers involving personal data of individuals in the UK and the EU.

Top of Form

CONSIDER OTHER OPTIONS FOR TRANSFERRING PERSONAL DATA TO THE US?

The CJEU has identified certain derogations under GDPR Compliance that can be used to facilitate personal data transfers to the US. One such derogation is when the data subject has provided informed and freely given consent for their data to be transferred abroad. However, even in these cases, additional safeguards and controls must be implemented to ensure GDPR Compliance with requirements. Another derogation allows for data transfers that are "necessary" for the performance of a contract. However, it is important to seek expert advice in such cases because the interpretation of transfers under this option is likely to be narrow. It is crucial to carefully assess and ensure that the transfer meets the specific requirements and conditions outlined in GDPR Compliance to maintain legal compliance. Overall, while there are limited derogations available under GDPR Compliance for personal data transfers to the US, it is crucial to exercise caution, seek expert guidance, and implement appropriate safeguards to ensure GDPR Compliance with data protection regulations.

[nbmsports]

What is it and why it matters

The Privacy Shield Framework logo is displayed on a smartphone screen.Pavlo Gonchar | Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty ImagesBusinesses can continue transferring data from the European Union to the U.S. as normal after the two superpowers this week agreed a landmark data-sharing pact.The framework, which replaces a previous agreement that was invalidated in 2020, is a major development with implications for U.S. tech giants, which rely on the pact to transfer data on their European users back to America.Without it in place, these companies faced the risk of costly initiatives to process and store user data locally — or withdraw their business from the bloc altogether. So the agreement of the new rules will provide some relief to Meta and other U.S. companies which share gargantuan amounts of user data around the world.However, the rules already face the threat of legal challenges from privacy activists, who are unhappy with the level of protection the measures offer European citizens. They say it isn't that different from an earlier framework called Privacy Shield.CNBC runs through all you need to know about the new EU-U.S. privacy framework, why it matters, and its chances of success.

What's the new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework?

The new data-sharing pact, called the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, aims to ensure that data can flow safely between the EU and U.S., without having to put in place additional data protection safeguards.In a statement Monday, EU executive body the European Commission said it concluded that U.S. data protection laws offer an "adequate level of protection" for European citizens, and introduced new safeguards limiting access to EU data by U.S. intelligence services to only what is "necessary and proportionate."A new Data Protection Review Court will be established for Europeans to issue privacy complaints. It will have powers to order firms to delete users' data if it finds the information collected was in breach of the new safeguards.

Why was a new data transfer agreement needed?

The Data Privacy Framework replaces a prior agreement, called Privacy Shield, which allowed companies to share data on Europeans to the U.S. for storage and processing locally in their domestic data centers.This was struck down in July 2020, when the European Court of Justice, the EU's top court, sided with Austrian privacy campaigner Max Schrems, who alleged U.S. law did not offer sufficient protection against surveillance by public authorities.Schrems said that revelations from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden about U.S. surveillance meant that American data protection standards couldn't be trusted.He raised a complaint against the social network Facebook which, like many other firms, was transferring his and other user data to the States, as well as the Irish Data Protection Commission, which is Facebook's main regulatory authority when it comes to data privacy in Europe.It reached the European Court of Justice, which in 2015 ruled that the then Safe Harbour Agreement, a previous mechanism for allowing European users' data to be moved to the U.S., was not valid and did not adequately protect European citizens.

It was replaced with the Privacy Shield, however, this was subsequently scrapped too.In the meantime, companies have relied on separate mechanisms known as Standard Contractual Clauses to ensure they can still move data across the Atlantic.These tools, too, are under threat.The Irish DPC in May ruled that Meta's use of SCCs for transfers of personal data to the U.S. is in breach of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation. The U.S. tech giant was fined a record $1.3 billion.

Why does it matter?

Multinational companies operate in various jurisdictions, and they need to move data on their customers across borders in a way that's both secure and complies with data protection regulations.U.S. tech giants share data on their European users back home all the time. It's part and parcel of the internet being an open, interconnected platform.But the way data is handled by these tech companies has come under heavy scrutiny by regulators and privacy campaigners.Meta, Google, Amazon and others collect huge amounts of data on their users, which they use to inform their content recommendation algorithms and personalize ads.There have also been countless examples of scandals surrounding the misuse of people's data by tech firms — not least Meta's improper sharing of data with Cambridge Analytica, the controversial political consulting firm.Europe has tough regulations when it comes to processing internet users' data.In 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, came into force introducing tough requirements for organizations to ensure they handle user data safely and securely. This is a law that applies across all the countries within the EU.The U.S., on the other hand, does not have a singular federal data protection law in place that covers the privacy of all types of data.Instead, individual U.S. states have come up with their own respective regulations for data privacy, with California leading the charge."There has been intense regulatory and political scrutiny on EU-U.S. data transfers, so there are notable differences in the U.S. law protections implemented to support the new framework," Holger Lutz, partner at law firm Clifford Chance, told CNBC via email."Changes to U.S. law have been made in parallel to enhance protections for EU personal data and rights for EU citizens in connection with that data. Those protections are not limited to the new framework – they also protect EU-U.S. personal data transfers outside the framework, and can be taken into account when making such transfers based on other legal instruments such as the EU standard contractual clauses."

Will it succeed?

The approval of a new data privacy framework means that businesses will now have certainty over how they can process data across borders going forward.Had there not been an agreement, some companies may have been forced to close their operations in Europe. Indeed, Meta warned this was a risk in February 2022.Still, obstacles lie ahead.Schrems, the Austrian privacy activist who helped bring down Privacy Shield, has already said he plans to launch a legal challenge to rip up the new data-sharing pact.

In a statement, Schrems said his law firm Noyb has "various options for a challenge already in the drawer.""We currently expect this to be back at the Court of Justice by the beginning of next year," Schrems said."The Court of Justice could then even suspend the new deal while it is reviewing the substance of it. For the sake of legal certainty and the rule of law we will then get an answer if the Commission's tiny improvements were enough or not."Privacy activists say the measures are not sufficient as U.S. privacy laws do not extend protections to non-U.S. citizens, meaning people in the EU don't have the same level of protection."Whether the framework is successful will be a matter of whether the European courts consider the protections for personal data in the US do enough to deliver essential equivalence to the EU protections," Lutz of Clifford Chance told CNBC."Businesses will be carefully considering these potential challenges in their scenario planning." Source link Read the full article

[pranaliahuja12]

How to Become a Certified Fitness Trainer in India?

Are you looking for a way to become a certified fitness trainer in India? If so, then you have come to the right place. Becoming a fitness trainer is a great way to get involved in the health and wellness industry and make a difference in people’s lives. This guide will provide you with the information you need to get started on your journey toward becoming a certified fitness trainer.  

We’ll cover everything from your basic educational requirements to specific exercises and techniques for strength training, nutrition, and diet advice, and what fitness trainer certification is available in India. By the end of this guide, you will be equipped with all of the necessary knowledge required to become a certified fitness trainer in India. So, let’s get started!  

Pre-Requisites and Eligibility Criteria for a Fitness Trainer Course  

If you’re looking to become a certified fitness trainer in India, there are several prerequisites that you need to meet first before applying for a fitness trainer course. The most important ones include:  

A valid proof of identity such as a PAN Card/ Aadhar Card/ Passport/ Driver's license/ Voter ID  

High School Certificate (Class 10th) or equivalent  

Medical fitness and ability for physical activity  

Minimum age of 18 years  

A passion for fitness and dedication to helping people from all backgrounds reach their personal health goals  

Benefits of Becoming a Certified Trainer  

When you become a certified fitness trainer in India, several benefits come with it. Not only will you gain the knowledge and skills necessary to help others achieve their health and fitness goals, but you will also enjoy some key advantages:  

Flexibility - Certified trainers have the flexibility to work part-time or full-time, depending on their needs. You can structure your schedule and set your hours so you can create a balance between work and family life.  

Growth Opportunities - By becoming a certified fitness trainer in India, you open yourself up to growth opportunities. You can use your certification to connect with others in the fitness industry, both nationally and internationally.  

Help Others - There is great satisfaction associated with helping people improve their physical health and manage their lifestyle choices. As a certified fitness trainer, you can provide guidance and knowledge to help individuals achieve their personal goals while providing them with valuable advice about nutrition and exercise habits.  

Types of Certification Courses Available  

If you're looking to become a certified trainer course for fitness in India, there are several types of certification courses available to you. The most common are the Strength and Conditioning Certification (SCC), Personal Training Certification (PTC), and Yoga Teacher Training (YTT).  

Strength and Conditioning Certification  

The Strength and Conditioning Certification (SCC) is a comprehensive fitness trainer certification for individuals who want to pursue a career in strength and conditioning. This certification focuses on developing strength, speed, power, flexibility, balance, agility, and endurance.  

Personal Training Certification  

The Personal Training Certification (PTC) is designed for personal trainers who want to specialize in helping people reach their fitness goals. This certified trainer course covers topics such as program design and implementation methods, client assessment techniques, anatomy & physiology basics, and exercise technique instruction. 

Yoga Teacher Training  

The Yoga Teacher Training (YTT) program is designed to help aspiring teachers become confident practitioners by deepening their understanding of the practice of yoga. YTT fitness trainer course fees is budget-friendly and covers topics such as teacher ethics & responsibility, how to teach asana sequence safely for individuals or group classes, introduction to pranayama & meditation techniques, yoga anatomy & physiology basics, and yogic philosophy & lifestyle practices.  

Are you ready to become a certified fitness trainer in India? The IFS Institute is the best place to start. The IFS Institute provides world-class fitness trainer course in the areas of strength and resistance training, nutrition, and health. Offering a comprehensive curriculum and hands-on training from experienced industry professionals, the institute provides a comprehensive education for those wishing to become certified fitness trainers in India.  

When you enroll in their programs, you'll be able to start your journey toward becoming a certified fitness trainer in India with confidence and knowledge.  

[seemabhatnagar]

Subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge acquisition or lapse of a land acquisition process

Government of NCT of Delhi V. Vijay Gupta and Others

Ruling of Supreme Court: Subsequent Purchaser has no locus to challenge the acquisition/or lapsing of the acquisition.

Issue: Subsequent purchasers, has or not has locus to challenge the land acquisition / lapsing of acquisition.

Law: According to Section 24(2) of “The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act”, Land acquisition process shall be deemed to have lapsed in certain cases,

Where an award is passed under section 11 of Land Acquisition Act and five years or more had elapsed prior to the commencement of (The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013) this Act has passed but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceedings shall be deemed to have lapsed and the appropriate Government, if it so chooses, shall initiate the proceedings of such land acquisition afresh in accordance with the provisions of this Act:

Provided that where an award has been made and compensation in respect of a majority of land holdings has not been deposited in the account of the beneficiaries, then, all beneficiaries specified in the notification for acquisition under section 4 of the said Land Acquisition Act, shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Facts:

The present Civil Appeal has arisen from the decision of the Delhi High Court holding that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment Government of NCT of Delhi preferred this Civil Appeal before the Supreme Court of India.

Specific case on behalf of the appellant before the High Court was that the Original Writ Petitioners(Respondent in the present case) before the High Court were the subsequent purchasers and they have no locus to challenge the acquisition / lapsing of acquisition.

However, the High Court has entertained the Writ Petition of the Respondents at the instance of the subsequent purchasers and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, relying upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Government (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Manav Dharam Trust and Anr., (2017) 6 SCC 751.

In the case of Shiv Kumar & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors., (2019) 10 SCC 229, the Supreme Court held the case of Manav Dharam Trust and Anr. (supra) is not a good law.

In similar subsequent matters decision of Shiv Kumar was followed accordingly, a subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge the acquisition and/or lapsing of the acquisition.

Observation of the Apex Court:

Original Writ Petitioners is not in a position to dispute that they had purchased the land in question subsequent to the acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Original Writ Petitioners is not in a position to point out any valid title deed.

The fact remains that the respondents can be said to be subsequent purchasers.

A subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge the acquisition /lapsing of the acquisition.

Original Writ Petitioners claimed the relief based on general power of attorney, will, receipt etc., which does not confer any title on the original writ petitioners/ present respondent.

Decision of the Apex Court:

The Bench of Hon’ble M R Shah J & Hon’ble C T Ravikumar J vide their order dt. 24.03.2023 quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the Delhi High Court on 06.08.2018. The Court held that there shall not be any deemed lapse of the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land in question as observed and held by the High Court.

Seema Bhatnagar

[legalwires]

Case Study: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. & Anr. Petitioners v. Cipla Ltd.

“A significant legal dispute between two major pharmaceutical companies centered on patent rights and generic drug manufacturing. The court upheld the validity of Roche’s patent but prioritized public access to affordable medication, ultimately leading to an out-of-court settlement between Roche and Cipla.” Citation: 2015 SCC ONLINE DEL 13619 Date of Judgment: 27th November, 2015 Court: Delhi…

[veneratechnologies]

CapMate 101 – Caption/Subtitle Files Verification and Correction Solution

Many of our customers had been telling us that the process of validating and correcting closed caption files is tedious, time consuming and costly! And that they needed an innovative QC solution for caption and subtitle files, similar to what we have done for Audio/Video QC. We took that request to heart and have introduced CapMate, the first comprehensive cloud native caption QC software that provides verification and correction of captions and subtitle files.

In fact, CapMate is so innovative and bleeding edge that many are not even aware of such a solution category! Of course, there are a large selection of capable programs in the ‘captioning’ category that allow for creation of caption and subtitle files. However, until CapMate came around, there was NO solution to address the dire need for an innovative automated software for caption QC that could find caption related issues, much less fix them! Before CapMate, caption verification and correction was a painfully slow, manual, and error prone process.

And so starting with this blog post and following up with a series of short blogs, I would like to introduce you to this new category of software and tell you more about CapMate!

Let me start by giving you the highlights! CapMate:

Is a cloud-native solution that can work with your local content or those in the AWS cloud

Has been in heavy production use for over a year and so it already is a robust and proven solution

Helps drastically reduce the amount of time needed to verify and fix caption files, improving operational efficiency

Supports all the major caption formats such as SCC, SRT, IMSC, EBU-STL, and many more

Has usage-based pricing (monthly/annual/ad-hoc) so you only pay for what you use

Can detect the most common and difficult caption issues, like Sync, Text Overlap, missing caption, and many more

Can also correct these issues, in most cases automatically, and allow you to generate a new clean caption file

And so much more….

You can see a short 1-min clip highlighting CapMate’s features here.

Be on a look out for CapMate 102, the next blog in this series where I will write about one of the key features of CapMate, its ability to accurately detect and correct caption sync issues! At any time that you think CapMate may be the subtitle QC software solution you have been looking for, contact us (sales@veneratech.com), and we are happy to give you a live demo of CapMate and set you up with a FREE trial account!

This content first appeared here on: https://www.veneratech.com/capmate-101-solution-for-verification-and-correction-of-caption-subtitle-files/