#uche and pamela. | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

ostatniakropla · 8 years ago

Text

get to know me

Zostałam otaggowana przez @fanfiction-by-vanilla za co serdecznie dziękuję! 💖 💖 💖 Name: Pamela

Nickname: Pam, Pami, Mela, Pamz, Melka, Pamcia

Star sign: Bliźnięta

Height: 165cm

Sexual orientation: bi

Hogwarts House: Slytherin (ewentualnie Gryffindor, ale to ewentualnie, bo Ślizgoni wygrywają :p)

Favorite color: czarny

Favorite animal: Przypuszczam, że Nieśmiałek i Niuchacz się nie liczą? :c

Average hours of sleep: uch, zazwyczaj śpię tak około 3 godzin? Ale w weekendy (i inne wolne dni) nadrabiam to jakimiś jedenastoma godzinami, więc ciężko jest podać średnią. :p Zwłaszcza, że czasami dodatkowo zdarza mi się ucinać drzemkę popołudniami. Oops.

Cats or dogs: chyba nie potrafię wybrać. :p

Favorite Fictional Character: Severus Snape, Derek Hale, Stiles Stilinski, Hermiona Granger, Draco Malfoy, Lucjusz Malfoy, Fred Weasley, George Weasley, Sherlock Holmes, Newt Scamander , Edward Nożycoręki, Jack Sparrow (i w sumie wszystkie inne wykreowane przez Johnny’ego)

# of blankets at night: 2

Favorite Bands: One Direction i… One Direction. Jest jeszcze kilka zespołów jak The Beatles, Lukas Graham, Perfect, Twenty One Pilots, Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, czy Happysad, których chętnie słucham, ale dla mnie 1D zawsze będzie głównym faworytem (nie mam pojęcia, co ze ta piątka ze mnie zrobiła. :p).

Favorite singers: Czesław Mozil, Organek, Dawid Podsiadło, Ed Sheeran, Lasio Companija, Hozier

Dream trip: Anglia

When was this blog created: uch, przypuszczam, że (również :x) w 2012 albo 2013 roku.

@oneitherside 💙 @helloimtina 💚 zapraszam do zabawy ;) xx

#jestem takim złym człowiekiem bo jeszcze nie odpowiedziałam na poprzednie ale za to dziękuję podwójnie! xx #*kiedy zostaję ottagowana przez osobę którą totalnie uwielbiam *.**#tagged #tagi #tag games #about me tag #priv #xx #vanilla

2 notes · View notes

tionanekkiamcclodden-blog · 8 years ago

Photo

see ya tomorrow! ✌🏿#Repost @simoneyvetteleigh ・・・ I'll be at the Whitney Museum 11-2pm with @nontsimutiti @tionam @daniellaroseking and other members of black women artists for black lives matter. #j20 #bwaforblm @bwaforblm. SPEAK OUT ON INAUGURATION DAY FRI, JAN 20, 2017 11 AM–2 PM Location: Third Floor, Susan and John Hess Family Theater Artists, writers, and activists affirm their values to resist and reimagine the current political climate. Participating Artists and Writers: Aaron Burr Society Gina Beavers Alicia Boyd Black Women Artists for Black Lives Matter (Nontsikelelo Mutiti, Tiona McClodden, and Daniella Rose King) Chinatown Art Brigade (Betty Yu, Tomie Arai, Liz Moy) Aruna D’Souza Jenny Dubnau Avram Finkelstein Kim Fraczek Chitra Ganesh Mariam Ghani Paddy Johnson Baseera Khan Carin Kuoni Simone Leigh Kalup Linzy Yates Mckee Naeem Mohaiemen Tracie Morris Uche Nduka Tavia Nyong’o Trace Peterson Laura Raicovich Mark Read Martha Rosler Mira Schor Dread Scott Gregory Sholette Amy Sillman Pamela Sneed Jaret Vadera Madison Zalopany Contributions from: Coco Fusco Guerrilla Girls Zoe Leonard This event is organized by Occupy Museums, an arts collective that explores the connections between economics, finance, and the art world. Their work will be included in the 2017 Whitney Biennial. The Hess Theater is wheelchair accessible and equipped with an induction hearing loop and infrared assistive listening system. American Sign Language interpretation will be provided for this program. Learn more about access services. Free with Museum admission, which is pay-what-you-wish all day on January 20. No advance registration is necessary. (at Whitney Museum of American Art)

#j20 #bwaforblm #repost

2 notes · View notes

maxwellyjordan · 6 years ago

Text

Tuesday round-up

Yesterday the Supreme Court issued decisions in three cases. In Apple v. Pepper, a divided court held that a lawsuit against Apple by iPhone users who allege that Apple is violating federal antitrust laws by requiring them to buy apps only from the company’s App Store can go forward. Amy Howe has this blog’s opinion analysis, which first appeared at Howe on the Court. Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for the opinion. At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “Justice Brett Kavanaugh delivered the 5-4 decision, joined by the high court’s liberal bloc, which may have far-reaching consequences for Silicon Valley.” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that although “[t]he lawsuit is in its early stages, and it must overcome other legal hurdles,” “successful antitrust plaintiffs are entitled to triple damages, meaning Apple’s exposure could be significant.” Additional coverage comes from David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, who reports that “[m]uch of corporate America had joined in support of Apple and argued that such broad antitrust claims should be blocked at the starting gate.” Scott Cosenza discusses the decision at LibertyNation, as does Tucker Higgins at CNBC.

In Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, also by a 5-4 vote, the court overruled a 40-year-old precedent, Nevada v. Hall, and held that a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state without its consent. David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times that the “ruling is both a win for the California Franchise Tax Board and a victory for the conservative principle of state ‘sovereign immunity.’” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that the decision “may be more significant if it signals that the court’s conservative majority, reinvigorated by two Trump appointees, is ready for a searching reassessment of constitutional law that could result in more precedents being overturned.” Tony Mauro reports for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), that in his dissent, “Justice Stephen Breyer … warned that his colleagues may be poised to overturn court precedents in upcoming cases in ways that will sow ‘increased uncertainty’ about the court’s consistency.” Additional coverage comes from Kimberly Robinson at Bloomberg Law and Bill Lucia at Route Fifty.

In the last decision of the day, a unanimous court held in Cochise Consultancy v. United States, ex rel. Hunt that a provision of the False Claims Act that stops the clock on the period for filing suit until relevant facts are discovered applies to private parties in cases in which the government has not intervened. Mark Walsh analyzes the opinion for this blog. Daniel Seiden reports at Bloomberg Law that “[t]he ruling affirmed that a whistleblower pursuing an FCA case on behalf of the government enjoys the same amount of time to file a case as the government would have if acting alone or in concert with the whistleblower.” At Law360 (subscription required), R. Scott Oswald writes that the opinion “showed again that the justices aren’t easily tempted to undermine the central purpose of the FCA since it was signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863: Holding fraudsters accountable when they pick the public pocket.” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.]

The justices also issued orders yesterday from last week’s conference; they did not add any new merits cases to their docket. Amy Howe covers the order list for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that the justices “declined to hear the appeal of a private religious school in a zoning fight with an Ohio municipality” and “refused to take up a case about whether [the Supreme Court’s] key precedent evaluating First Amendment retaliation claims by public employees applies to a claim alleging retaliation based on an worker’s association with a public-sector union.” At Greenwire (subscription required), Pamela King reports that a “coalition of trade groups lost its bid to fight Oregon’s low-carbon fuel program before the nation’s highest bench, as the Supreme Court today rejected the groups’ petition and declined to review two other energy-related cases.” At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson looks at a dissent by Justice Samuel Alito from denial of review in a case in which the lower court had upheld a prisoner’s First Amendment challenge to a prison’s refusal to process a grievance because of its content.

Amy Howe reports for this blog that “[t]ensions over the death penalty resurfaced [yester]day at the Supreme Court.” At NPR, Nina Totenberg unpacks the “highly unusual … explanatory statements from the court’s conservatives as to why they reached such apparently contradictory decisions in two death cases in February and March.” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin at The Wall Street Journal, who reports that “it was extraordinary for Justice Samuel Alito to publish an opinion Monday disclosing his previously unknown vote in March to deny a stay of execution, prompting Chief Justice John Roberts to reveal his own vote on the other side.” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences.

Briefly:

In the latest episode of SCOTUStalk, John Elwood joins Amy Howe to talk about cert petitions at the Supreme Court.

At Greenwire (subscription required), Ellen Gilmer reports that, in its merits brief in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which asks whether the Clean Water Act covers pollution that moves through groundwater before reaching a federal waterway, “Maui County is appealing to conservative Supreme Court justices’ trademark textualism in a bid to nail down limits on the scope of federal water protections.”

We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!

The post Tuesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

from Law https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/05/tuesday-round-up-478/ via http://www.rssmix.com/

#law #justice

0 notes

infinitprods-blog · 6 years ago

Text

Pls help Save A Life – This is Henry, He is a hearing and vocally impaired boy and need to have a surgery to stay alive , The doctors said there is a fluid in his head .

CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK TO READ HIS FULL STORY OR DONATE - https://donate-ng.com/campaign/i-am-deaf-and-dumb

He needs another surgery and he needs to be monitored monthly. His own hydrocephalus is from the birth and he was diagnosed of that when he was born but was neglected. The shunt is just to keep him alive, if not he would have died by now.

The shunt won't reset his Brian to start reasoning like adults. He has other malformations and abnormalities in his brain that has contributed to his hearingand vocal impairment, the operations won't reverse it but will just help him live, he will only be normal, talk and hear by God's grace.

His sexual organs needs to be checked too,if his sexual organs didn'tform well, an IVF will be used in the future for him. If nothing is done to stop the seizures as soon as possible, his brain might be completely damaged.

All the symptoms of hydrocephalus are completely shown, he can barely see clearly now, please help him in any way you can.

Without financial gifts from friends such as you, we would be unable to help the thousands of people out there who have no place to turn. The gift of just a thousand naira or less, when multiplied by hundreds/thousands of benefactors, can provide services and help to save Henry's life .

No contribution is too small (and no contribution is too large either!). Please take a moment to think about if it was your friend, your child, your family member who had no where to turn.

CLICK HERE TO READ HIS STORY OR DONATE . https://donate-ng.com/campaign/i-am-deaf-and-dumb

You can also donate through his sister's account :

Account details :

Account Name : Pamela Chinaezendu Uche. Account Number : 6239010323 Bank Name : Fidelity

#giveback philanthropy newyork kickstarter campaign indiegogo crowdfundingcampaign artistsupport volunteer kickstart fundingartist fundingfas #brokeartist independentfilm kickstartme screenraiser follow patreonmodel film fundingcampaign watches igers kindness event development goodc #keralafloods moneyproblems paypal cats donation crowdsourcing cancer crowdfunder dogs homeless bhfyphydrocephalus #@chikalann @todays_life_foundation @t_d_foundation @ubongkingfoundation @greatjohnsonfoundation @destiny.foundation @leah_foundation @ga

0 notes

thehistoricaloracle-blog1 · 7 years ago

Text

The beginnings of man

Human evolution Human evolution has been a long process and its start point still disputed but estimated to be around six million years ago . This process starts from the first transition of apes to humanoid like animals. All people share the physical and behavioural traits shared by our apelike ancestors and we have evolved over a period of approximately six million years.

Humans are primates. Our genetic similarities to our primate friends are near twin, 96% of our DNA is from our Chimpanzee cousins. Though we also share 70% of our DNA with Slugs so, variation. Humans and the great apes of African chimpanzees and gorillas share a common ancestor that lived between 8 and 6 million years ago and demonstrates our very close resemblance.

Humans first evolved in Africa, and much of human evolution occurred there, it wasn’t for another 4 million years till humans travelled elsewhere. The fossils of early humans who lived between 6 and 2 million years ago come basically entirely from Africa. In south Africa, an archaeological site named “The cradle of Humankind” and though is not likely to be where humankind was created, has the most extensive amount of early humanoid fossils and bones ever discovered.

However, scientist have formally recognised between 15-20 species of early man but clearly only one species survives being Homo Sapiens.

Human evolution Chart (Hominoid/Homo) Name Date

The Great Apes 15 million

Homo Habibis 2.8 million

Homo Erectus 1.8 million

Homo ancesstors 1.2 million

Homo heidelbergensis 600 Thousand

Neanderthal 500 thousand

Homo Sapiens 300

When do we leave Africa?

Early humans first migrated out of Africa into Asia probably between 2 million and 1.8 million years ago. They entered Europe much later between 1.5 million and 1 million years. Each of these migration paths then allowed humans to develop and evolve further to suit their environment. Such as shown by all species and developed by the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin. These evolutionary developments can be seen in those with white skin as they are contacted with less UV light than their ancestors. White skin allows the absorption of high levels of Vitamin D which is less present in colder environments.

What is the study?

Paleoanthropology is the scientific study of human evolution. The field of study involves the study similarities and differences between humans and other species. These can be characteristics in their genes, physiology, and behaviour. Paleoanthropologists search for the roots of human physical traits and behaviour. Attempting to discover how evolution has shaped the potentials, tendencies, and limitations of all people. Defining us as humans One of the earliest defining human traits is the ability to walk on two legs or to give its technical name bipedalism. This evolved over 4 million years ago and defines one of the main physical transformations from ape to man. Other important transitions from Ape to man include one thing that men surpass every other species in and that is brain size. Such a large and complex brain has allowed the ability to make and use tools, hunting tactics, language and art, culture and diversity is all made possible from the human brain.

Up Next…Civilisation itself! Bibliography

1. Birx, H. James, 21St Century Anthropology: A Reference Handbook (London: SAGE/Reference, 2010), p. 60

2. Bulliet, Richard W, Steven W Hirsch, Lyman L Johnson, Pamela Kyle Crossley, and David Northrup, The Earth And Its Peoples, 7th edn (Boston: Cengage Learning, 2018), p. 6

3. Fleminger, David, The Cradle Of Humankind (Johannesburg, South Africa: 30° South Publishers, 2006), p. 41

4. Haviland, William A, and William A Haviland, Evolution And Prehistory, 10th edn (Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013), p. 61

5. Hull, Kyle, “Shared Human DNA | Science-Based Life”, Sciencebasedlife.Wordpress.Com, 2012 [Accessed 1 April 2018]

6. “Introduction To Human Evolution”, The Smithsonian Institution’s Human Origins Program, 2017 [Accessed 1 April 2018]

7. Jeffrey H. Schwartz., Rethinking Human Evolution (MIT Press, 2018), p. 33

8. Strum, Shirley C, Donald G Lindburg, and David A Hamburg, The New Physical Anthropology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999), p. 154

9. Charles Darwin’s Theory Of Evolution Overthrown: Origin Of Species Is Traced - The Cambrian Era Is Implicated As The Origin Of Species, 2018, p. 53

10. Bundy, Wayne M, Out Of Chaos (Boca Raton, Fl.: Universal Pub., 2008), p. 181

Key Points

1. Human evolution has been a long process and its start point still disputed but estimated to be around six million years ago

2. 96% of our DNA is from our Chimpanzee cousins

3. Humans first evolved in Africa

4. . The fossils of early humans who lived between 6 and 2 million years ago come basically entirely from Africa

5. Scientist have formally recognised between 15-20 species of early man but clearly only one species survives being Homo Sapiens.

6. Paleoanthropology is the scientific study of human evolution.

7. One of the earliest defining human traits is the ability to walk on two legs

8. A complex brain has allowed the ability to make and use tools, hunting tactics, language and art, culture and diversity

9. Each of these migration paths then allowed humans to develop and evolve further to suit their environment. Such as shown by all species and developed by the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin.

Terms of Interest

Bipedalism – The ability to walk on two legs

Paleoanthropology- The scientific study of human evolution

#early man #history #archelogy #humans #science #walking

0 notes