#tw: transfem supremacy

[candiid-caniine]

hey fuckmutt, this transfem thinks you're so pathetic. as a butch im clearly superior to you, you dumb genderless fagpup. your pathetic little tcock doesn't even compare to mine. how about you edge for me to apologise for being so below me 😘

^this....this is what I wanna see in my inbox more often.

dear God. this has me so feral y'all don't even KNOW.

[t-girl-breeder]

Reblog if you love tgirl rapists!

[bunniefemcel]

there should be a urinal in every women's bathroom. at least as many as there all stalls. a black one. a white one. one that thinks she's a boy. and a terf one!

[punkeropercyjackson]

White people need to stop making media,their idea of morally gray male characters is always fucking pedophiles

[gockruler]

ur forever a man btw! you will never change that. no lesbian will ever like you, only bisexual women with a femboy fetish. the rest of us wanna gag when we see u

Oh I can certainly help you gag lol.

[big-mean-trans-dyke]

Hello, ma'am. Can I ask for terfbreaking content, but terf on her periods and you humiliate her for that? Pretty please ass up head down

Good little TERFs get what they want~

One of the best ways to teach a TERF her place is to embarrass her into it. They're so fond of old-fashioned and ironically misogynistic rhetoric, so I turn it on them.

In the old days, they used to consider periods a simple divine punishment for being a woman, and didn't bother trying to relieve the pain. They were almost right. Really, periods are a punishment for *having a cunt*.

So every month, when it's my TERF's 'moon time' or whatever the fuck they like to dress it up as these days, I have them crawl into my office. Walking is for cuntgirls who know their place. I have her face the wall, put her head on the floor, and spread her legs so I get a nice view of 2/3 holes.

And then we go over a nice, long, lesson. It's different every time, maybe about how periods are a punishment for being a cunt, maybe how you owe any transfem that doesn't want to use your bleeding cunt extra special time using your ass or mouth instead. How cramps are no excuse to not put out, how if you really want relief that badly, you know what you need to do. But we don't move on, she just gets to bleed on the floor, pussy on display, until she's happily parroting every bit of rhetoric I feed her.

And then, without any fanfare for a whore that doesn't deserve it, I finally get up, kneel behind her, and slide my cock into her. I don't care if it hurts, I make every effort to teach her properly what her worth is. And I use her like that until I feel myself getting close to cumming, usually feeling her cunt starting to clench around me at the same time.

Can't have her getting off too easy, though. If she wants a 9-month period break, she has to prove she knows her place first. So instead, she gets my dick in her mouth, nose pressed to my pubes. I spray my load down her throat, shove her face back to the floor, and walk away. Eventually, she learns that if she sucks my cock willingly, I'll even let her get up from that position instead of showing off all night.

[electricentertainmentexhib]

lmao adding “girl” to every adjective you actually are doesn’t make you female, faggot

what are you gonna do about it, make fun of me? pin me down by my hands make fun of me for dressing as a woman? tear my clothes off, revealing my twitching girlcock? make fun of me for getting hard off being made fun of? call me such a pervert for invading womens spaces oh ill show you invading womens spaces you say as you slide me into you? i think i huave covid

[candiid-caniine]

cw: genderplay, transfem supremacy, breeding kink

hhhh feeling completely normal [read: humping my bed] about some kinda particular intersection btwn transfem supremacy and cucking 🫠

just. I'm this agender cuntpet service toy, right. and She's my mean owner. I service Her girlcock whenever, wherever, and however She commands because it's my obligation. but...I'm mostly a sex toy, I'm spayed, and I'm not a boy or a girl, just a pet, so Her obvious right to fuck and breed boys and girls is not fulfilled by me.

just imagining Her getting ready to go on dates. telling me in detail all the things She's going to do to Her hookups, all the ways I fail to service Her. calling me useless. calling me Her "right hand" because She only ever jerks off with me 🫠 and then when She gets home She takes me out of my cage and forces my face in Her crotch and forces me to huff the smell of sweet, fertile cunt dripping off Her 💕

if I'm lucky, maybe I get to clean Her off with my tongue. or maybe She fucks me without cleaning Herself off and mocks me about how this is as close to true breeding stock as I'm ever gonna get. or She has me fuck Her with my strap and tells me it's as close to worthy cunt as I'm ever gonna get.

maybe sometimes She brings me along, or brings Her dates home, and they mock me about how useless I am, how I'm lucky She even keeps me around when She has as much cunt as She could want. maybe my job is to fuck Her with a strap while Her partner cockwarms Her, milking Her prostate as long as She desires.

bonus points if She never even cums in me 💕 maybe on me, if I'm lucky, but maybe She denies me Her cum - why would She waste it on me, anyway? my job is to edge Her and be good porn for Her so that when She finds someone She wants to breed, She's nice and backed up and full. maybe the closest I ever get to Her holy girlcum is using my tiny little puppy strap to keep Her dates plugged up so it'll take 🫠 I'm just there to get Her hard and be Her right hand, after all 💕

[fern-thee-otter]

In honor of Pride Month, I decided to shoot my shot as well so: Alice In Borderland LGBTQ+ Headcanons

| m a s t e r l i s t | m a i n . m a s t e r l i s t |

[Disclaimer: These are (mostly) only headcanons. And yes, I use the official flag colors for the colored text. tw// mention of hōmõphøbia, tränsphøbia, sûìcíde, manga spoilers, etc.]

^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^ . ^

Arisu (he/him) - Bisexual disaster. Also gender nonconforming. He likes traditionally feminine stuff. Kuina taught him how to do makeup and piss off bigots by simply being in their sight. Kinda gives off transmasculine vibes as well so... yea :D. And when dysphoria kicks in, he locks himself up in a room, usually with Usagi, with them recommending him to do activities he enjoyed in the original world, like video games and other stuff.

Karube (he/him) - I said it once. I said it twice. And I'll say it once again: Karube is one of THE bicons of A.I.B. He was even Arisu's bf, and this part from the 7♡ from the manga is pretty much some damning proof.

(A bit biphøbic/hōmõphøbic of Netflix to not include this scene imo :/ I mean, they were obviously more than friends if he wanted to live together with Arisu in Australia).

Chota (he/him) - not a part of the LGBTQ+, but 100% an ally :D

Usagi (she/they) - Pansexual demigirl. Every so often they throw hands at anyone who talks shit about them and Arisu (especially when misgendering them both). Her father was supportive of her coming out. Unfortunately, that happened about a month or two before he unålïved himself.

Chishiya (he/they) - Transmasc. Started HRT when he was 12-ish or so (before starting puberty). The Mona Lisa and that one theory about her (manga readers, iykyk) was somehow his awakening. They cut their hair at 16 and went 'Yk what? I like it.' and that's how they kept it until now. Has top surgery scars and he's proud of it. Also a biromantic ace-spec. You can already bet your ass they had a black ring on the middle finger of their right hand before but they lost it once at a game and didn't bother buying/stealing another one. That's why we don't see him wearing it.

Kuina (she/her) - Canonically, she's transfem. By headcanon, she's also pansexual. She teamed up with Chishiya because t4t supremacy. She's the one who introduced Chishiya to eyeliner and do each others' make up every so often. And as I said earlier, she also taught Arisu how to do his makeup. She gets rid of bigots as a hobby (basically, everyone in here hates bigots, hōmõphøbes, tränsphøbes, and the list goes on).

Ann (she/her) - That's a lesbian right there. She's not into men at all, and all the fandom can agree on this.

Niragi (he/him) - Most likely bisexual (who had internalized hōmõphøbia before). His bullies were hōmõphøbic as well; might be another reason they kept calling him 'twisted', 'a freak', yada yada.

Last Boss | Takatora (they/them) - Mofo's got the three A's (Aroacegender). Slashes down everyone who misgenders them on purpose with their sword. On their free time, they look at the others at The Beach, judging them and talking to cats they find roaming around the place (or even with Cabot. Thanks @aceofspadegrass for coming up with Cabot a long time ago).

Tatta (he/him + neos) - Unlabeled and lowkey transmasc. Still trying to figure himself out. Experimenting with neopronouns. Kissed xyr fair share of people.

Aguni (he/him) - GAY, GAY, HOMOSEXUAL, GAY!!! Him and Hatter were husbands. I dare you to change my mind.

Hatter | Danma (he/him) - PAN AS FUCK, BABY! Discovered that he also liked guys in high school after making out with Aguni, and later on discovered that he's actually pan. He also has a love/hate relationship with the pan jokes (he either hates them or does them himself).

Mira (she/they) - Aroace, lesbian, demigirl and batshit insane (affectionate). Need I say more? Need I say fucking more?

Kuzuryuu (he/him) - Bisexual and tired. Let's just say that a certain nudist philosopher band leader was his awakening and does he regret it? Hell no. Also tired both from the bullshit from his life from the normal world and the blatant biphobia/queerphobia he came across.

[punkeropercyjackson]

Sasuke's behavior makes a lot more sense when you remember he was 7 during the Uchiha massacre,only 12 when Orochimaru got him to join his side and not even 18 in all of Shippuden.I may be an asshole but i'm also not a monster so i'm not about to hate a child because he witnessed his older brother genocide'ing their entire family in front of him when he wasn't even in the double digits and then spent 5 years living alone because he was seen as 'a precious tragedy' and didn't have the social skills to make friends with other kids since nobody taught him any so he got gr00med and isolated by a ped0phile into doing bad things as a result because he wasn't 'nice' about it.Sakura knew what was up,he DIDN'T do anything wrong and DID deserve to be saved and loved even if it wasn't in Konoha and i also understand why she wanted it to be by her side specifically since they were eachother's first love and why she forgave him for the murder attempts seeing as he was literally replapsing both times and not even targetting her in particular seeing as he hurt Naruto in his normal state plenty of times with zero remorse but DID feel bad about hers since she actually cares about him and the Uchiha heritage unlike mister 'You were MY friend,do what I say,not what YOU want'

@desi-pluto

[t-girl-breeder]

This is true for tboys too!

Hey you! Shy trans girl reading this! You know that cute cis lesbian girl you like, but you're too shy to actually ask out. Just skip all those steps and rape her! If she liked you back then no problem, and if she didn't she certainly will after you impregnate her a few times. You are superior to her in every way. Take what you want.

[baeddel]

@androfem​ has made a number of good posts about transmisogyny, addressed to a milieu I’m very glad not to be part of anymore. I wanted to run off of something they wrote in this one...

[2.5k words. transmisogyny, racism tw. epistemic status: Hawkeye Gough]

while hedging an argument in the second paragraph, they write “i’m by no means someone who can definitively say what tme/tma mean” (thus preparing us to hear a definition but to treat it as nondefinitive), but that they see the acronym ‘tme’ (’tranmisogyny exempt’) as “the most palatable attempt trans women and transfem nb people have made towards identifying whether other trans people are one of them or not, and other trans people communicating that as well voluntarily.” By palatable they mean to other people in their milieu, who they spend the rest of the post attacking over the reasons they found all the other terminology (casab etc.) unpalatable. Their criticisms are all quite good.

But - am I crazy, or, aren’t they wrong in this quote? The way I remember it, trans women did not come up with the term ‘tme’. This was something that tme people came up with themselves. The use of tme would eventually become imbricated with the disuse of casab, under the argument that casab requires you to ‘out’ yourself, and so on, which was its own controversy. But originally it wasn’t related to this reservation or at least I never experienced the two as connected. tme was something that, to us, came out of nowhere; it was something like an alien bacteria penetrating the atmosphere from the belly of an asteroid; it woke us up to a whole neighbouring discourse that we were unaware of. That neighbourhood was made up of cis women, trans men, and nonbinary cafabs who were beginning to grapple with the ‘transmisogyny question’. At the time, most people did not take the concept of ‘transmisogyny’ seriously; many people still believed that trans women had male privilege and so on. It was a huge surprise to us to find a whole emerging discourse of non-trans women who believed transmisogyny was real and took it seriously enough to invent their own terminology for describing it.

It’s possible you can trace the coinage to some trans woman somewhere. But at least, at the time that we encountered it, we understood it to be the self-description of non-trans women. A lot of trans women at the time reacted very negatively to this. One of the main criticisms was that tme was not a ‘coherent category’ - could we say that it tries to be too definitive, ie. a definition that overapplies? The anxiety was that it would collect the experience of subjects which cannot rightly be put together; trans men, cis women, cafabs, whoever else, do not all experience patriarhcy(!) in the same way. They all have different proximities to misogyny, emotional labour (when you were still allowed to say that), access to community, sexual access & availability, and so on. Later or earlier, I don’t remember, this same discursive device would be used by trans women against casab; we were derided for “treating casab like a coherent class.”

Androfem may be surprised to learn that this criticism orginates with trans women, if they weren’t there for this. The gesture returns, later on in their post, when they chastise others in their milieu for reading trans women’s arguments in bad faith. They caution that “the assumption shouldn’t be made that [a transfem is] completely unaware of or in denial about” all of the various nuances of proximity whenever she says “definitively” (emphasis mine) that “tme people aren’t affected by transmisogyny”. At this point, the taboo on definitions reaches a delerious extreme - Androfem’s peers take issue even with this tautology! And the solution Androfem proposes is not to take the claim seriously, but to secretly insert something that disrupts it, imagine some inapplicable cases, and so on, and, further, to assume that she is also doing it behind the scenes. Androfem identifies this obsurantism with transmisogyny; their peers cannot bear to take a trans woman seriously, so they will always send her work back and demand a new more palatable analysis. And we trust they are right to make this diagnosis; but this trans woman experiences it as the terrible return of her own native discourse. What we sowed in 2012 they now reap in 2021.

Why has this discourse progressed to such an epistemologically vicious place, where no statements about gender are possible? Baudrillard would enjoy watching our transsexuality become transpolitical. For whatever unconscious reason, whenever we are presented with a master signifier capable of rendering the transcendental field, we are immediately compelled to castrate it. Our destiny is to constantly throw discourses into indifference. Maybe. But the more direct lesson is that something went wrong with the method of analysis we employed to explicate transmisogyny in 2012. What went wrong?

Maybe we can begin with some statements in Androfem’s post and work backwards. They write that “tme people benefit ... from transmisogyny”, although they insert in parenthesis “(some more than others)”. This was an analysis we would have subscribed to in 2012. In 2021, we now want to ask: who benefits and in what way? Who benefits more, who less, and why?

It’s true that transmisogyny brings some profit. Growing up as trans girls we are often deployed as women are deployed; we become the older sister, surrogate mother, and secret girlfriend. Whenever our peers see us in the correct light and notice our softness (to borrow a Saxon term), they exploit it. For boys the profit derives primarily from our socially acceptable proximity in the enforced homosociality that children in our culture endure. The trans girl is a girl who you can have sleepovers with, who you can have in the boys locker room, and so on, and therefore have early sexual and emotional access to. Girls generally exploit it a little later on, when heterosexual relations are expected. The trans girl can be a special kind of boy, like a ‘gay best friend’, but who is sexually available. Both boy and girl cast their brief teenage becomings on their own special gendered Other who is capable of facilitating it by her difference. Contra Balzac, it is precisely her castration that allows her to function as a superavailable Other, not (yet) as an overproximate Same that makes us recoil.

This relation of the tme to trans women dominates in the Bay Area of California, where trans women have resumed some of our traditional roles as temple functionaries. You probably have some homeless or recently homeless or about-to-be homeless trans woman (lets say she is ‘having to be homeless’) in your overcrowded apartment who will always be there to help you process your gender feelings and is probably down to fuck if you can get over yourself and make a move on her.

But these wages of transmisogyny are transitory and marginal. While most trans women will have encountered some of these kinds of exploitative gendered relations, it is by no means a universal experience of tme people. And, whats more, it is possible to have these relations, with the same benefits, which are not exploitative. I have known many cis girl-trans girl couples who got together under the bonds of enforced heterosexuality because of the profit each had for the other - the trans girl is not threatening, better about her boundaries, and so on, perhaps because of her own experiences of sexual exploitation; the cis girl, for equally contingent reasons, just ‘gets it’, and doesn’t try and make a man out of the trans girl - and when the trans girl realizes she is trans and comes out to her partner, the two track an escape route from heterosexuality together. There is no reason to expect it to always go one way, exploitative, or always the other, emancipatory. Is the cis girl ‘benefitting from transmisogyny’ in this scenario? Is she perhaps benefitting less than others, or more than others? I think that we cannot easily analyze every relation between person and person in terms of cost and benefit; even when we are bound by structures of domination, we cannot already anticipate the outcome. At the same time, if such experiences are rare, we aren’t surprised, because we know that the desiring-situations are staged in a certain way that makes discovering these kinds of escape routes difficult.

But simaultaneous with these occasional benefits, 1. transmisogyny is usually damaging to a trans woman without bringing any profit to her persecutor, and 2. transmisogyny is usually damaging to a tme person as well. Don’t you think so? Superficially, it acts as a limit on your presentation; all cis men growing up experience limits on their behaviour, backed by punishments, to prevent or destroy whatever might seem transsexual in them. Maybe it plays a similar role in the upbringing of cis women, trans men, cafabs, etc., in ways that are waiting to be articulated? On a deeper level, transmisogyny - as the hygeine of gendered categories, the social governance of presentation, etc. - plays a crucial role in the overall desiring-situation of oppressive heterosexuality; it creates a series of taboos, anxieties, myths and harsh realities which, in some indirect way, help to maintain heterosexuality’s renewal in each successive generation.

I think some harm was done by a too-ready application of frameworks developed to analyze white supremacy to the question of gender. The progressive leitkultur in those days was still the ‘invisible napsack’. While for transmisogyny the benefits are merely occasional, there are universally accessible wages of whiteness. White people enjoy a distorted labour market; the deterritorialization of black neighbourhoods creates (barely) affordable apartments for (eg.) white students [the scenario with the Oakland enaree we described implicitly takes place in one of these apartments]; and, most generally, there are habits of prosociality between white people which are difficult to break that continually renew the same distribution of wealth, status, care and intimacy [Eldridge Cleaver referenced Harry Golden’s gag about ‘vertical integration, horizontal segregation’ (pg 67) as a good description of race relations in Folsom; we find it to be a good description of race relations in the trans community as well].

When we tried to apply these readymade frameworks to transmisogyny, we found it difficult to construct relevant categories. Transmisogyny could not be domesticated to a form of exploitation metaphorized in economic terms. Therefore, every further demand for a ‘materialism’ that could clearly enumerate the relationships of exploitation would be frustrated, finding only edge cases and anecdotes. There was no underlying machinery that always produced this or that outcome. Therefore, each category was “incoherent”, too definitive, unable to capture what we took for an underlying system that was just out of reach. But the problem was only a misplace of focus. Transmisogyny is not really a system of exploitation; it’s the nightmare of a patrilineality that cannot enforce its borders. It is necessary therefore to move beyond categories like oppression and privilege, bigot and victim, exploited and exploiter, and deal with the domination that captures both ‘tme’ and ‘tma’ in its ruses. Now we can answer some of the old warhorses; CASAB is not a class which we can say anything about, nor is tme or even tma; it is rather the residue of a paternal subjugation, a ‘weight of dead generations’ that everyone confronts moments upon their exit from the womb; a universal coercive sexuation which we cannot help but encounter, combat or obey, enforce on others and despair in our private moments. Everyone, everywhere, is aware of the problem; and the exit is waiting, somewhere, as yet undiscovered, for anyone to seize.

So much for the riddle of 2012. In 2021 the situation is not really the same. Androfem’s milieu were not socialized by anti-revisionist parties and do not metaphorize their experiences in economic terms. Their platform is a sort of legalism. They enter into a discourse which has been a continuous bloodbath for twelve years (the relevant year for them is not 2012 but 2009, and the website not tumblr but wordpress); every discussion has already been had; what is necessary now is only to enforce the common law precedent. They are obliged to accept the existence of transmisogyny because it was already accepted before they got there; they don’t really understand why and are not curious about it. They are not gender abolitionists, but inclusionists. If they had lived thirty years ago they would probably have been exclusionists and thirty years before that, inclusionists again. Every conversation begins with some pious disavowal, ‘I can’t believe we’re having this conversation again...’ Everything has already been tabulated in their stare decisis; asexuals are not lgbt, queer is a slur, cottagecore is colonialist, and so on. What motivates them is primarily some irrelevant triviality like whether this or that fanfiction is normalizing abuse or whatever. It is thus easy to see why Androfem argues that the old taboo on being definitive is transmisogyny; in their milieu it is a strategy for rendering the anti-transmisogyny laws unenforcable. If the law is ever invoked there is a loophole; look here, you missed this nuance...

Much of that milieu - from my own experience with it - is dominated by TERF cults that essentially run friend groups as front organizations; they start off siccing teenages on each other over shipping drama and soon encourage mobbing trans women undesirables. These networks were active on wordpress in 2009, they were on tumblr when I joined in 2012 (where they were able to leverage irl connections to intimidate members of my friend group who were organizing), and they are running discord servers and stalking tumblrs here in 2021. [If anyone from that scene is reading this far and this sounds at all familiar to them: I’m sorry but, yeah, you’re in a cult. You’re better than this! The fandom drama commentariat is not really worth trying to reform. Sauve qui peut!]

These are normally crypto-TERFs who are ‘officially’ inclusive of trans women and, in fact, their friend-group cults are usually full of trans women. Trans women, we have to say, make the most ruthless transmisogynists. To this extent we must disagree with Androfem when they say that “the smallest demographic in [TERF] communities are transfems”; in my experience transfems have sometimes been the most numerous, and it is precisely because TERFs are organized around transmisogyny. The reasoning behind this paradoxical outcome is understandable only in terms of dianetics and thetan space operas.

Anyway. I have sometimes felt that transmascs need some kind of Prince of their own; someone who is able to articulate his own transsexual line of critique in the face of trans women’s well-known and well-settled one, but with the minimum amount of ressentiment; who can hold his own against transfeminine parochialsm and not cave to cheap attacks, but also not make them, and not become parochial himself. I think that ‘tme’ is at its most valuable as an organizational principle when only someone like Androfem can “definitively” articulate it. It has to be a space for tracking the escape from my own desiring-situation on my own terms, in my own style, by my own design; bathed in my own light... But to be capable of accomplishing this it needs to become a break with all previous discourses. One that is open, flexible, and forward-looking; a dangerous gambit which is definitive and unprecedented...

[candiid-caniine]

Oh my gosh! That transfem supremacy post is so good! Transfem supremacy is one of the rare kinks that can actually make me feel somewhat dominant >w<

im so glad you like it hehe 💕 and I love that it helps you tap into your dominant side!

imo, transfems don't have to be dominant to still be superior when it comes to transfem supremacy kink, tho. I don't see a lot of content about it, but I think there's probably a lot of room to play with a submissive yet superior transfem role 💕 pillow princess transfem who gets as much strap from cuntpets as she wants, maybe? masochistic transfem who orders her inferiors to hurt her in the most pleasing ways? the way that someone domming a transfem would be less commanding and authoritative, and more so worshipful and attentive and adoring even if they were being dominant... the way "good girl" and "yes, take it, that's it" might sound different from someone service dom/topping their superior, always with the "please be pleased with me" silent at the end, but implied 💕

idk if I'd be any good at writing it, but lord would I love to be a fly on the wall.

[t-girl-breeder]

i have such a big fantasy of a stalker sneaking into my house to replace my birth control with sugar pills so she can breed me :3 once its over, thinking that at least im not pregnant, and being very very surprised a few weeks later

ok fucked up kink time

I also have a fantasy of being a serial stalker and rapist to fertile girls and boys and really anyone, and essentially knocking up as many people as I can find so I can spread my fucked up rapist genes to as many people as possible, making more “me”s. But if you want it, then that’s something I can provide 🩵

(I know it sounds a bit… fashy? with the gene talk but I find it really hot sorry)

[t-girl-breeder]

shoutout to @hungtranny-the-return and her idea of training “weaker” transfems to become attack dogs against cis people but instead of attack it’s rape and to be used for when you’re not feeling up to doing it yourself. amazingly hot idea, fucked up that tumblr deleted the original blog after

[t-girl-breeder]

Under transfem supremacy, transfems will rule over their lessers (this is obvious). But what does that entail?

In my vision of it, it means that:

-harems for transfems are encouraged and state-sanctioned (don’t worry subby transfems, you can join a harem too! just expect to be at the top of the harem)

-transfems can completely decide on their partners’ birth control and other medicines

-rape is legal to commit for transfems

-public sex acts are encouraged, to show the dominance of transfems over their lessers

-TERFs, radfems, and general transphobes will be used as public sex toys and will have no human rights, and can be found in many public locations if a transfem just needs some quick relief

These are just my ideas for a transfem supremacist world; add your ideas in reblogs!