#tr 251

[trialsinthelateromanrepublic]

trial of Statius Albius Oppianicus

iudicium Iunianum date: 74 BCE charge: lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis (poison attempts) defendant: Statius Albius Oppianicus advocate: L. Quinctius tr. pl. 74, pr. 68 (ORF 107.I) prosecutors: P. Cannutius (subscr.) (ORF 114.II) A. Cluentius Habitus (nom. del.)  iudex quaestionis: C. Iunius aed. 75? jurors (thirty-two in all): C. Aelius Paetus Staienus (Staienus [1]) q. 77 (voted C) M’. Aquillius sen. ? M. Atilius Bulbus sen. (voted C) M. Caesonius pr. by 66 L. Cassius Longinus pr. 66 (voted NL) C. Caudinus sen. (voted NL) L. Caulius Mergus sen. (voted NL) Q. Considius sen. (voted NL) Cn. Egnatius sen. (voted C) C. Fidiculanius Falcula sen. (voted C) Ti. Gutta sen. (voted C) Cn. Heiulius? sen. (voted NL) ? C. Herennius sen. (voted C) M. Minucius Basilus sen. (voted C) L. Octavius Balbus, = ? P. Octavius Balbus sen. (voted NL) ? C. Popillius sen. (voted C) P. Popillius sen. (voted C) P. Saturius sen. (voted NL) P. Septimius Scaevola sen. (voted C)

Cic. 1 Ver. 29, 39; 2 Ver. 1.157; 2 Ver. 2.31, 79; Caec. 28, 29; Clu. 66-77, 105; Quint. Inst. 4.5.11; [Asc.] 206, 216, 219, 255, 263St; Schol. Gronov. B 339St; Schol. Pers. 2.19; see also Cic. Brut. 241, 244, 251

[opalid]

251. There is no fire like lust; there is no grip like hatred; there is no net like delusion; there is no river like craving.

Dhammapada, Malavagga: Impurity (tr. Buddharakkhita)

[fangirlinglikeabus]

But not as we are now: a clear reference to 1 Corinthians 15:51-2: 'We shall all be changed', read in association with the Pauline texts which deny distinction in heaven of gender, race, status (e.g. Galatians 3:28). These passages reflect Anne Brontë's deep scrutiny of the scriptural texts concerning Heaven, no doubt in dialogue and latterly dispute with Emily Brontë, and her awareness of the inhumanity of the traditional reading of the divine system of reward and punishment. Heaven is distrusted by Markham as a place of separation, a magnified and irreversible version of that experienced on earth, for in heaven personality is lost. This is Markham's version of Cathy's dream in which 'heaven did not seem to be my home' (Wuthering Heights, Ch. 9).

-Stevie Davies, note to p.404 of The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

the grovelling caterpillar: compare Emily Brontë's use of the caterpillar/butterfly motif, an ancient emblem of the soul's immortality, in her apocalyptic Brussels essay, 'The Butterfly' (1842): 'As the ugly caterpillar is the origin of the splendid butterfly, so this globe is the embryo of a new heaven and a new earth' (tr. S. Davies, in Stevie Davies, Emily Brontë, Heretic (Women's Press, 1994, p. 251). But Emily's version of earth as 'a vast machine constructed solely to produce evil' (p. 250) gives this conclusion a satiric edge.

-Stevie Davies, note to p.405 of The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

if faith would never fail: Anne Brontë had wrestled with strong religious doubts, to the extent of fearing that God was a 'vain delusion' ('A Hymn', 29). The faith she represents in Helen was formed on the basis of conflict with the doubt voiced by Markham in this important dialogue.

-Stevie Davies, note to p.406 of The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

[viperhan]

Mersin Erdemli Türbe Bahçeşehir Konutları 4+1 Satılık Lüks Daire

Yeni İlan https://www.vipemlak.com/konut/satilik-daireler/mersin-erdemli-turbe-bahcesehir-konutlari-41-satilik-luks-daire/?utm_source=TR&utm_medium=Tumblr+%230&utm_campaign=SNAP%2Bfrom%2BV%C4%B0PGAYR%C4%B0MENKUL

Mersin Erdemli Türbe Bahçeşehir Konutları 4+1 Satılık Lüks Daire

Mersin Erdemli Türbe Bahçeşehir Konutları 4+1 Satılık Lüks Daire ÖNCELİKLE DAİREMİZ MERSİN ERDEMLİ TÜRBE CLUP BAHÇEŞEHİR SİTESİ 4+1 251 M2 DİR. CLUP BAHÇEŞEHİR SİTESİ BÖLGEDE İLERİ GELEN EN LÜKS SİTELERDEN SADECE BİRİDİR. SİTE İÇİ, AÇIK YÜZME HAVUZU, ÇOCUK YÜZME HAVUZU VE OYUN PARKI, GENİŞ ÇİM PEYZAJ ALANI VE SPOR ALETLERİ, TENİS KORTU, VOLEYBOL, BASKETBOL ALANI, […]

[virtue-and-beneviolence]

[raamitsu]

Found a mind-blowing theory on twitter and I wanted to share it with yall…

What do you guys think ? I feel like there’s a hidden truth behind this theory and it’s worth finding out more 🤔 And Hanma’s “the survivors of death” seems suspicious to me now that OP pointed it out that way… Can’t believe I missed that one.

[chifuyusgangshirt]

love wins, the greedy, money obsessed dude in your evil gang turns on you because he's in love with his best friend

[yinyeu]

when i said love wins

[violettierre]

Shotout to Waka for being the first human alive looking so elegant while kicking the kid he used to babysit

[unfinshedsentec]

Well, RIP Pah. You got your 20 seconds of time💀

[mochiswifey]

TOKYO REV 251

WHAAAAT HOW THE FUCK DID KOKONOI BEAT BENKEI JUST LIKE THAT?

WHAT KIND OF HIDDEN POWER HE HAS?!?!?!?

POWER OF GAY? DAMN!

[belindarimbi13]

Kokonui (& Akane) Parallelism

Chapter 157 // Chapter 251

Akane always tells Koko about doing something that he'd like.

She told him, to kiss the person he likes.

She told him, to live the live he wants.

Akane was Koko's voice of reason.

Deep down, Koko know what or rather who he wanted, but Akane helped him to understand that.

Brb crying at Koko letting go of Akane's ghost and embracing the fact that he would always choose Inupi. One that when he was guilty of doing so, and this time when he was confident about making the right decision.

[skystreaka]

Kokonoi following his kokoro.  🖤 🤍

Version without background under the cut. 

[naehja]

A lot of people thinks that Koko is in danger because Sanzu hates traitors and that, in the Bonten!Future, people who had betrayed Bonten were klled by Sanzu.

But for some reason, I don’t think that Koko is in danger, right now.

First it’s not Bonten for now, even if there are a lot of adults in Kanto Manji Gang and that Sanzu already killed someone who betrayed Mikey.

Also for now, Koko has just protected Inupi, sure it can be seen as a betrayal. But if he doesn’t do more that that for now it could be okay. 

Also Koko is TOO important. he's the money maker in Kanto Manji, probably the only one. That’s why he was so important in the bonten!future. In all the futures unil now (whatever it was with Toman, under Izana, or with Bonten), Koko was always super important because of this talent.

Killing him would be bad for Kanto Manji, even if it’s in a “nobody will have him then” way. Kanto Manji would lose a lot. Sanzu isn't idiot, he knows it. they NEED him, especially now that their organisation really starts.

Sure, he could kill Inupi to punish him but there are NO way that Koko would ever obey to Mikey after that or work with Inupi’s killers.it would be a punishment, and Koko would be eaten by guilt until his death, but he would never return with the culprits. Again, Kanto Manji would lose their very important money maker.

(Also i’m not sure that Wakasa would let Sanzu kill Inupi)

The only way to keep Koko under the control of the Kanto Manji gang would be to threaten Inui, or more precisely to keep him as hostage, to force Koko to obey. And in the battlefield like that, it will be hard to capture Inui. Because how Sanzu could do it NOW?

So i think that Koko and Inui are safe for now.

[snakegentleman]

I’d like to believe that Pah has rocking eyeliner in this panel. It looks a lot like the way Koko’s eyeliner is drawn