#this is about travis but does apply to athletes in general | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

gabriellakirtonblog · 5 years ago

Text

[The Best] Breaking the Rules of the Fitness Industry, and More

Want to put great fitness content on our radar? Post on Facebook and include #PTDCBestSubmission.

Best Content of the Week

[Video] Should You Ditch the Scales? — Ben Carpenter and Sohee Lee

youtube

Just because you’ve heard 10,000 fitness professionals agree on an idea, that doesn’t make it right. In fact, the idea could be a terrible approach when applied to your specific clientele.

But how do you know when to follow the crowd, and when to push back? You shouldn’t accept everything you read at face value. But it’s equally unsound to use your own observations and anecdotes as the scientific foundation of your clients’ fitness programs.

As the saying goes: “Know the rules well, so you can break them properly.”

In this week’s best fitness content, Ben Carpenter and Sohee Lee offer a perfect illustration of how to combine experience and research to question the idea that we should all disregard the scale. They explain how it became so widely accepted, and why they decided to challenge it—all in less than four minutes.

— Dani Singer

Best Article

What Will You Be Proud of When We Return to Sports? — John Sullivan, Changing the Game Project

COVID-19 has thrown everyone for a loop, including and in some ways especially athletes. But in the disruption, John Sullivan sees opportunities that coaches, athletes, and parents should all take advantage of. If we do, sports can come back better than ever.

— Shane McLean

Best Video

Why You’re So Stressed, and What You Can Do About It — Brendan Burchard

youtube

If not for “pandemic,” “stress” would probably be the most trending word of 2020. You’re stressed. Your clients are stressed. We’re just one big walking mess of tension and anxiety, trying to practice deep breathing while wearing a mask. This video by author and high-performance coach Brendan Burchard will help you and your clients understand and manage your stress with proactive and practical strategies.

— Esther Avant

Best Social Media Post

View this post on Instagram

We take pride in what we do, and it's usually easy to recognize when it’s taken for granted. Believe me when I say it: the personal training industry – complete with its weekend certifications and Facebook fame – leaves a very large stage for ridicule, if the right person wanted to take a shot at it. _ It’s a sure smack in the face when I hear this question from an outsider when they find out I work with fitness clients for a living. _ Thanks to social dogma, the worldwide misconception of fitness trainers being mere paid motivators who solely rely on some drill sergeant persona and physically training alongside their clients is something that will never die, until we target the general public and focus on better educating them towards a sufficient baseline of fitness knowledge. Until then, I will belong to a perceived sandbox industry that’s only a lily pad towards a “real job” – You know. Ones with ties and briefcases and stuff. _ Maybe it’s for this reason I see so much compensation amongst fitness professionals, comparable to Napoleon syndrome for the vertically challenged and unhappy. It’s pretty funny – A conjured and superfluous job title, a lengthy biography along with purist extremism to boot. In my time in the business, the amount of Body Transformation Specialists, Fitness Engineers, and Physique and Performance Optimization Experts have job titles that are only fooling the stupid. Most of the masses will still call them plain old personal trainers or coaches – the same way the world has much more comfortable alternate names for Transparent Wall Technicians and Sanitation Engineers. _ But I digress. My point of this post is to stress that public knowledge or not, I believe fitness is just as evergreen an industry as anything else. As long as you make the right moves while in it. People don't "age out" of needing help with their fitness, that's for sure. It's on us to let ignorant folks know that, and ultimately give the industry a bit more Kudos. _ That's one reason why my typical response to the question In my image is one word long: "Retire". _ Puh.

A post shared by @ coachleeboyce on May 5, 2020 at 7:21am PDT

Posted by Lee Boyce on Tuesday, May 5, 2020

If you’ve worked in the fitness industry for more than a day, chances are you’ve heard some version of this question. (My personal favorite: “But what do you do full-time?”) Lee Boyce reminds us that as long as people need help with their fitness, they’ll need fitness professionals. We never need to apologize for who we are and what we do.

— Christina Abbey

Best Podcast

Behavior Change and Eating Habits — Krista Scott-Dixon, Greg Nuckols, and Eric Trexler, Stronger by Science Podcast

Eating behaviors are notoriously difficult to change, with layers of biological, psychological, and environmental influences to work through. Krista Scott-Dixon of Precision Nutrition explains what we’re up against when we try to coach our clients through habit change, and offers realistic strategies to do it more effectively.

— Mike Howard

More Great Fitness Content

[Article] How Bad Is Aging for Your Gains? — Menno Henselmans, mennohenselmans.com

[Video] Rep Ranges for Different Muscles — Layne Norton

[Social Media] Blanket Advice About Movement Does Harm — Travis Pollen

[Video] The Best Exercises for Older Adults — Michael Mash

[Social Media] “Feelings Aren’t Facts” — Kevin Mullins

The post [The Best] Breaking the Rules of the Fitness Industry, and More appeared first on The PTDC.

[The Best] Breaking the Rules of the Fitness Industry, and More published first on https://onezeroonesarms.tumblr.com/

0 notes

flauntpage · 6 years ago

Text

The Outlet Pass: Trae Young is Master of the Impossible Pass

Trae Young's Passing is...

Trae Young’s notorious three-point shot has yet to come around—he takes some exceptionally difficult shots and has made fewer than 30 percent of them—but he might already be one of the best passers in the NBA, top ten in every category worth mentioning with an undeniably positive impact on teammates. Atlanta’s assist rate is 66 percent with Young on the floor and 56.8 percent—a team low—when he’s not. (That disparity equals the gap between being third and 19th in the league right now.)

As Hawks GM Travis Schlenk recently told The Undefeated’s Marc J. Spears: “He got a lot of notoriety for his deep shooting in college, which is obviously great. But his court vision at his age, 19 years old, to be able to see the floor like he does, and ability to pass left hand, right hand, off the bounce, hitting the guys down the floor, that is what really stood out.”

Young doesn’t pound the ball or even have to penetrate in order to draw help and find an open man. Guys simply run the floor faster and cut into space harder, knowing he’ll hit them on the money if/when they get open. His kick aheads alone deserve to be nominated by the MacArthur Fellows Program. This brings us to a pair of his passes that, so far, are probably my two favorite of the entire season.

The first came a few days ago against Miami. Young was trapped high on the right wing and appeared to have his whole line of sight blocked, but a quick up-fake lifted Bam Adebayo off his feet and out of position. Young then pivoted middle and, using his left arm, fired a blind cannon at Omari Spellman who was standing in the weak-side corner. The ball must've traveled at least 35 feet before it arrived in Spellman's shot pocket a split second before the defense’s rotation.

Words don’t do this pass justice. It’s something only a prodigy would think of, and immediately makes you fantasize about the realms of Young’s potential that have yet to be realized. He’ll never shoot as well as Steph Curry, but he already has the same range. Mix that with an unselfishly inventive approach to commanding Atlanta’s offense and it’s not insane to think he can lead the league in assists and scoring some day—the former is a borderline guarantee.

The next pass came during a nationally televised game against Luka Doncic and the Dallas Mavericks. (For the record, even before Atlanta uses the future pick Dallas gave them to move up on draft night, it appears both teams won that trade!). Young rebounds a missed three, takes two dribbles, then whips a one-handed line drive at Taurean Prince as he streaks up the left sideline. A corner three is essentially created out of thin air!

Film Session: Milwaukee’s Defense May Need to Change

The Milwaukee Bucks have a top-three defense and, whether Giannis Antetokounmpo is on the floor or not, are brick-walling opponents with a game-plan that couldn't be more different from the blitz-happy aggression encouraged by Jason Kidd over the past few seasons. Once upon a time, Milwaukee’s goal was to sew the game with chaos. They'd trap, recover, and scramble all over the court. It was compelling, controversial, and, given Milwaukee’s unprecedented length, theoretically a good fit. The Bucks forced a ton of turnovers and occasionally made Kidd look like he knew what he was doing, but they were inevitably done in by poor communication, missed rotations, and untenable execution. Pure talent and questionable shot selection aside, it was their defensive issues—Milwaukee surrendered a ton of corner threes and layups—that weighed them down.

Milwaukee isn’t playing like that anymore, which is ironic because their new head coach, Mike Budenholzer, enforced a similar strategy in Atlanta. Instead, they’ve adopted a conservative base defense—right now they rank 27th in opposing turnover percentage—that was en vogue half a decade ago but has since been swallowed whole by the three-point revolution.

The approach plays out as such: When offensive bigs run up to set ball and flair screens, Milwaukee’s defenders will drop back and stay in the paint. They want ball handlers to either meet their length at the rim or submit via a mid-range pull up. So far, so good! Only four teams are forcing more long twos; after they finished dead last in opponent shot frequency at the rim in 2017-18 and 2015-16, the Bucks currently rank first.

For the regular season, it’s a low-risk, medium-reward tactic that fits their personnel and maintains order. Switching is mostly frowned upon, which simplifies defensive rebounding (long an issue for the Bucks) and reduces the negative side effects that long rotations tend to have, which is evident when you look at how often they foul shooters relative to the past four years.

It feels unfair to attack something that’s obviously working, but this scheme can only do so much against the best offenses in the league. This is something I touched on in greater detail earlier this week in a column about Joel Embiid’s individual defense, but the same principles apply: Against the league’s most potent offenses, any plan that doesn’t account for pull-up threes is antiquated and futile. And guess what: Milwaukee is allowing a higher three-point rate above-the-break than any team in the league!

In the Bucks' season opener, the Charlotte Hornets went 16-for-38 from deep. The Kawhi Leonard-less Toronto Raptors went 9-for-45 (Kyle Lowry took nine threes and missed them all). Milwaukee's first loss came against a Boston Celtics team that jacked up 55 triples (more than ever before in franchise history) and tied a league-record by making 24 of them. The Sacramento Kings finished 14-for-36 and, in Milwaukee’s second loss, the Portland Trail Blazers drilled 17 of their 43 tries.

None of this is a coincidence. The Bucks want teams to take floaters and tough mid-range jump shots, but in doing so they’re conceding a ton of pull-up threes. Even though the Golden State Warriors don’t like running a bunch of high pick-and-rolls with Steph Curry, Fiserv Forum would spontaneously combust if they did.

Five years ago, guards and wings (and some forwards!) didn’t have the freedom to jack threes up off the bounce. During the 2013-14 NBA season, only four teams launched more than six pull-up threes per game. Today, two-thirds of the league eclipse that volume. What Milwaukee wants/needs is for the ball-handler's man to earn his money at the point of attack. Either fight over a screen and take away the shot by pressuring from behind, or duck underneath and either allow a poor shooter to shoot his shot or recover in time to take it away.

This is where Milwaukee’s length and tenacity comes into play. Khris Middleton, Giannis, Malcolm Brogdon, Eric Bledsoe, and Donte DiVincenzo are not terrible at navigating on-ball screens. But against just about anyone, it’s still extremely difficult work.

But pull ups aren’t the only threat. The league has never had more big men who can and will stab you from beyond the arc. And when their man is deep in the paint, trying to stop penetration, a kick back pass usually results in an open look.

Bledsoe has no interest in switching onto Al Horford, knowing it would let Kyrie Irving surgically remove Brook Lopez’s ankles from his body. But it’s unclear if leaving Horford wide open is a better strategy.

It makes sense to drop Lopez and Ersan Ilyasova because rim protection is good and neither guy is particularly mobile in space. But to have them do so while seemingly ignoring specific matchups is not the wisest move. Watch how the Celtics take advantage by having Horford set a flare screen for Irving. Ilyasova might as well take a nap.

And the strategy applies across the board! Why don’t Giannis and Malcolm Brogdon make life easier for everyone involved by switching this? Instead they give up an open three to a good three-point shooter.

This brings us to the future, and how Milwaukee will solve a problem that doesn’t currently exist. They may not feel this way, but adding an athletic big who’s more comfortable switching and scurrying on the perimeter—while still providing offensive substance—should be a priority before the trade deadline.

If they run into an opponent who plays Lopez off the floor, the rangier Thon Maker isn’t good enough to fill those minutes. The Bucks struggled mightily with Giannis at the five last season, too. (That doesn’t mean it can’t work—they have more two-way players this year—but assuming Budenholzer doesn’t venture too far from a formula that’s yielding terrific results throughout the regular season, how hard will it be for the Bucks to adjust after a sharp left turn in the playoffs?)

It’s a fascinating conundrum and one worth keeping an eye on as the season goes on. Milwaukee’s legitimacy as a true title contender may hinge on it.

Josh Jackson is Drowning

It feels like yesterday, right around the 2017 NBA draft, when it became clear that Josh Jackson did not want to get drafted by the Boston Celtics, a winning organization that couldn’t offer the same opportunistic environment (in terms of shots and playing time) lottery picks of his stature normally step into. He cancelled a workout that was to be held in Sacramento while Danny Ainge, Mike Zarren, and Brad Stevens were literally in the air flying to it, which probably made the decision to take Jayson Tatum that much easier.

As the saying goes: Be careful what you wish for. Jackson was instead picked by a dysfunctional organization that also has quite a bit of young talent. So much, in fact, that Phoenix’s coaching staff can’t find time for Jackson to contribute. His PER is 2.1, and his minutes are drying up.

Before the Suns even trade for a starting point guard—assuming that day comes this season—they already have so many mouths to feed at Jackson’s general position. (And that’s also before you mention Deandre Ayton, the first overall pick who needs reps and touches.) Devin Booker, Trevor Ariza, T.J. Warren, and Mikal Bridges are all better than Jackson right now. He can’t shoot from literally anywhere and has a comically abysmal turnover rate that’s a couple mistakes from becoming the league’s worst, per Cleaning The Glass.

Jackson’s trade value has never been lower, and the long-term consequences of his current struggle loom over an organization that might’ve squandered three top-five picks in the past six drafts. That’s not a great way to rebuild! If Jackson can’t be much more than Tony Allen (in an era where Tony Allen couldn’t even be Tony Allen), it’d be a significant blow.

Jaren Jackson, Jr. Wants to Make Post-Ups Great Again

It’s downright strange to watch Jaren Jackson, Jr. operate in the post and believe that he recently turned 19. The strength, stoicism, patience, determination, and technical skill has been unreal, and by letting him do work down low instead of placing him on the outside as a full-time spacer, the Memphis Grizzlies deserve credit for believing what their eyes (and early statistical returns) have told them.

The first time I watched him play in an NBA game, he sprinted up the floor, sealed 255-pound Derrick Favors just outside the restricted area, caught Marc Gasol’s entry pass, and immediately scored with a lefty jump hook.

Jackson Jr. already has a reservoir of post moves, and he executes them with admirable composure. He doesn’t get flustered or worry if his shot is contested, and can get to either hand whenever he wants. (Apologies to Favors.)

A first-class ass whooping at the hands of Golden State’s swarming defense on Monday night notwithstanding, Jackson Jr. is a migraine down low. He’s fluid, strong, and packs a delightful spin move that bigs around the league have yet to figure out. It’s a breath of fresh air watching someone that young enter the league with skills that are A) still valuable, B) inevitably unguardable one-on-one, and C) ostensibly extinct in the way he’s using them. According to Synergy Sports, Jackson ranks in the 73rd percentile on post-up possessions, and they account for 27.4 percent of his offense (the eighth-highest proportion in the league right now).

He’s still a rookie, and obviously needs to round out other areas of his game—Jackson Jr. is 1-for-14 from behind the three-point line since Memphis’s second game—but all that will eventually take care of itself. (He made 40 percent of his threes in college, was 5-for-9 in the preseason, and 14-for-28 during summer league.)

It’s just cool to see him contribute in a way that complements his veteran teammates while adding wrinkles to an offense that wants to be slow. Jackson Jr. is going to be so freaking good, and his advanced post game is a notable reason why.

The Buddy Hield Bandwagon is Ready to Roll

Buddy Hield’s hot start can be explained by absurd shooting numbers. Compared to last year, he’s up 11 percent at the rim, 10 percent from the mid-range, and 6 percent from deep (he made 43.1 percent of his threes in 2018, so, yeah, this dude currently exists as an inferno).

These numbers should come back to Earth—he's averaging 20 points, six boards, and three assists per game—but they're also a sign of his natural progression towards becoming an extremely valuable player type. Hield can shoot on the move, standing still, and pulling up in transition. He can escape-dribble his way into a cringeworthy albeit accurate long two or attack a closeout and then finish strong at the rim.

Even if Hield doesn't sustain his shooting splits (doing so would be super human), players who spend the entirety of a game racing around the court to leverage their gravity in myriad ways are a luxury. Chasing him off the ball for 32 minutes would be my idea of hell on Earth. Last year he averaged 1.95 miles per game, which was about the same as Rockets center Clint Capela. This year he’s at 2.62, trailing only three players in the entire league. Even more wild is Hield’s average speed. He’s one of the 15 fastest players in the league, but everybody who ranks higher doesn’t even cover half as many miles per game as he does.

Defense is a big issue; Hield was repeatedly obliterated by Eric Bledsoe over the weekend. But he’s still only 24 years old, with the stamina and shooting chops to potentially become a more dynamic version of J.J. Redick. This comparison is an absolute best-case scenario but also within the realm of possibility. It should make fans of the New Orleans Pelicans cry themselves to sleep, and fans of the Sacramento Kings feel great knowing their team's backcourt of the future is outscoring opponents by 11 points per 100 possessions when on the floor.

Hield isn't a star, but he doesn't need the ball to have a similar effect. That matters.

Watching Dante Exum Figure It Out is Pure Joy

One of the more fascinating contracts offered last summer was a three-year, $33 million deal awarded to Dante Exum by the Utah Jazz. I say “awarded” because the 23-year-old’s first four years in the NBA were mostly a collective dud. Facing obstacles that mostly weren’t his fault, Exum wasn’t able to write a resume that rationalized Utah’s decision.

He tore his ACL in 2015 while playing for the Australian national team, and two years later had a shoulder surgery that sidelined him for four months. When healthy enough to play, he shot miserably from deep and struggled to command Utah’s offense. Turnovers were high. Assists were low.

Exum’s defense flashed peaks that made playing him worthwhile, but the blurry end-to-end zip he displayed before his knee injury was but a flicker; much of his offensive play this season remains a concern (Exum still isn’t making threes or finishing at the rim), but there’s an aggression and confidence that weren’t there before. As the Jazz clearly believed when they offered that contract: It's not about what you've done, it's what you can do.

Just from watching him play, there are certain aspects of Exum’s game that make it impossible not to want to see how high his ceiling will be. He cuts hard, gifts soft lobs to Derrick Favors and Rudy Gobert, relentlessly attacks the paint like someone who’s never felt pain, and draws fouls by bringing the ball low and tempting defenders to swipe at it, a la James Harden.

Exum also has an individualistic flair that allows him to stand out in a system that sometimes makes Donovan Mitchell look like Beyonce right before she left Destiny’s Child. Take the layup seen below as a prime example. It’s awesome. Exum darts to the basket and then, with time of the essence, seamlessly pushes off the wrong foot to kiss his layup off the glass before Karl-Anthony Towns can block it.

Plays like this only yield two points, but—speaking as someone whose bank account is completely unaffected regardless—they’re graceful enough to justify the investment Utah has made in Exum, and part of the reason why their offense averages a whopping 6.3 more points per 100 possessions when he’s in the game.

TL;DR: It’s Not a Bad Time to be a Hornets fan!

Most of the attention in Charlotte should be directed towards the good (a top-five offense and the league's sixth-best point differential!) and somewhat infuriating (the league’s worst win differential...again!) aspects of their surprising start. Beyond that, something unexpectedly attractive is happening to a franchise that once felt rudderless: The Hornets have an intriguing/good young core that makes their future much less bleak than it appeared to be 20 months ago.

Charlotte looks like a playoff team. They’re disciplined, explosive, led by the best point guard in the Eastern Conference, and their new reasons to be optimistic about the future double as explanations for their current success. The Miles Bridges, Malik Monk, Tony Parker, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Willy Hernangomez all-bench squad is crushing people by 22.1 points per 100 possessions (they’re +19 in 43 minutes). That’ll come down as opposing three-point shooters regress to the mean, but the group is still so watchable and quietly boasts a thrilling pair of 20-year-olds who play basketball without a seatbelt.

Bridges is experiencing natural growing pains but already looks like a positionless gem; James Borrego trusts him enough to play in crunch time and guard the opponent’s first option—as he did for a recent stretch against Russell Westbrook.

(This is kind of a random observation, but in comparing Bridges to Aaron Gordon, you can’t help but notice the benefits of falling in line on a team that already has accountability, direction, and a distinct pecking order. Bridges’s role is clear. He knows how to help and feed off his teammates. Meanwhile, in Orlando, Gordon’s “what should this dude be?” limitlessness was initially thrown against a wall just to see what would stick. Again, that was random, but something that went in my notebook last week while I was watching a Hornets game.)

Monk has been inefficient, but Tony Parker’s rejuvenated play lets him work off the ball instead of backing Kemba up at the point. Ask him to worry about others and Monk tends to overthink the game. Tell him to score and Charlotte’s offense makes a lot more sense. The most important thing about him and Bridges looking this good is the effect it’ll have on Walker’s unrestricted free agency. No matter what, locking him into a five-year max contract would not end well. But an expensive sub-max agreement that covers the next four or five seasons is much easier to swallow with Monk and Bridges providing a youthful push. With those two inevitably finding their way into Charlotte’s starting lineup, the Hornets can rebuild on the fly around their franchise point guard.

That’s easier said than done, pending how much Walker’s next contract is actually worth. Nicolas Batum’s current deal erases any path to cap space, while Bismack Biyombo, Marvin Williams, and Kidd-Gilchrist have $45 million worth of player options they’re likely to pick up. The following summer, with Walker paid (and Frank Kaminsky renounced), Cody Zeller, Bridges, Monk, and Batum’s player option are all that’s left on the books. Walker will be 31 then, but an opportunity to reshape their image around their intriguing young studs will present itself.

This Has Nothing to do With Basketball But…

Whenever a jump ball takes place during an NBA game, the world's two kinds of people reveal themselves: Those who want to hear "Jump" and/or "Pass the Courvoisier" get blasted over the PA system, and everybody else.

The Outlet Pass: Trae Young is Master of the Impossible Pass published first on https://footballhighlightseurope.tumblr.com/

0 notes

jananbalachandran-blog · 7 years ago

Text

Fantasy Football for Dummies - Week 5: Moving on Up

I've talked before ad nauseum about how Fantasy Football tricks the average person into believing they are smarter than they are. Usually, this manifests itself in the form of that one dude in your league that fields a team full of "sleepers" - players that aren't stars by any means, but could conceivably provide matchup issues with the opposing team. “Smart Guy” will usually win the first 3 or 4 weeks of matchups with guys like Marvin Jones, Gio Bernard, Case Keenum, and the like. It's a tough way to play, and relies on incredible foresight and research. The wheels tend to fall off when the inevitable happens - role players come down to Earth. Professional sports has always been about the stars, and football is no different. Or is it?

In one of my earlier weeks, I talked about the idea that football is actually several games played within a game. When you think about the stars of the league, there seems to be very little objective reasons for why they are stars outside of "OBJ does shampoo commercials" or "Tom Brady’s wife is hotter than he is". Even more common are the detractors, the "Antonio Brown isn't special, any receiver would be great with Big Ben throwing to them" guys, or the "Eli Manning is the trash boy of New York and OBJ just cleans up his mess" guys. Personally, I don't think either of these “guys” are right, but it's a pretty difficult question to debate. These sorts of questions arise in football more than any other sport because of the inextricable links between the various positions. Are receivers good because of their quarterbacks, or vice versa? Is the secondary good because of the pass rush, or vice versa? That said, there are a few sure things in football, and whether or not they are objectively true, they seem to be universally agreed upon. The problem is, I know very little about football, so here are the ones that I have found, that are probably less agreed upon.

Quarterback: Drew Brees

I don't really understand how Drew Brees is so good. He's old, he's not that fast, and he's MAYBE 5'10 on a good day. It's inexplicable how he just puts up these ludicrous seasons year after year, without any notable drop-off in production. Whatever concoction of pain killers and HGH he's on, I want in.

Wide Receiver 1: Michael Thomas

Yeah he's a rookie that hasn't done much yet but he's going to be a star for two reasons. 1) He's really fucking good and 2) Drew Brees is throwing to him. Do you see a pattern starting to emerge?

Wide Receiver 2: Larry Fitzgerald

The receiver version of Drew Brees. Old ass dude looking like the Predator in a helmet schooling all the young'uns. The crotchety old man in me loves him.

Tight End: NONE

Tight end is the dumbest and most unreliable position in fantasy football. They always seem to have the height advantage over CBs and the athletic advantage over linebacker but for some reason, coaches just love using them as blockers for the run. I guess you could say Rob Gronkowski or Travis Kelce, but the former is always injured and the latter has his own dating show.

Running Back 1: Anyone running behind the Dallas Cowboys O-Line

The jury's still out on whether Zeke is a product of a system or a generational talent. Regardless, his life is made infinitely easier by the Cowboys Offensive line. I have never understood the intricacies of line play, and probably never will, but when I see Zeke run through holes the size of Texas, I start to think that I might have given up on my NFL dreams too soon.

Running Back 2: Carlos Hyde

He just looks like a guy that's trying his best, and the struggling-maintain-the-facade-of-competency man inside me loves that.

Defence: Denver

They have the best passing defence in the league, meaning they tend to get quite a few interceptions. Chris Harris is incredible and Aquib Talib is incredible and also a madman. They could get 3 interceptions or a 3 game suspension. Their wildcard nature intrigues me.

Kicker: Who the fuck cares

I usually try to apply something I learned during the week of fantasy to my own life so here goes: life is more like football than basketball. In basketball, the stars have a disproportionate impact on the game and can dominate at will. If Michael Jordan wanted to win every game, he could just play every minute and take every shot. In football, outcomes are more circumstantial, and the results tend to rely more on the quality of your teammates. Good things tend to happen when you try your best for your team rather than for yourself. You know that feeling you get when you help someone out of a shitty situation? Imagine feeling like that all the time. The world doesn't need 7 billion Jordans - we need 7 billion Carlos Hydes.

0 notes

riederstravis · 8 years ago

Text

Noneconomic Damages: What is Below the Tip of the Iceberg?

If you have suffered from medical or hospital malpractice caused by negligent care, you may be entitled to collect compensation for both economic and noneconomic loss. Economic damages, sometimes called “compensatory damages,” are provided for such items as medical and hospital bills, lost income due to taking time off work, and other so-called “out-of-pocket expenses.” These damages are often referred to as the tip of the iceberg. What is below the iceberg? Noneconomic damages. These noneconomic damages will compensate you for costs that are not easy to calculate, such as pain and suffering, humiliation, disfigurement and, often most importantly, loss of life’s pleasure. These damages are different when a person dies due to negligence. Those damages are governed by Pennsylvania’s Wrongful Death and Survival Act. Spouses may also have a claim, which is called loss of consortium, society and services.

One of the reasons why you need a good and competent lawyer is that oftentimes insurance companies and others may request subrogation, also called reimbursement. There are times when amounts of money have to be repaid to insurers and government agencies. There are also times when this does not have to be done. The rules are extremely complex. The lawyer you hire needs to know what they are doing.

Economic damages may be more straightforward and easier to calculate. However, there is also the question of benefits that an employer may provide and, of course, cost of living increases. There is no noneconomic barrier as such. Pennsylvania does not have formal limits as to what can be awarded in compensatory and noneconomic damages. However, in medical liability cases, the Mcare Act does provide for remittitur and other ways to review a verdict. In a medical liability case, the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, remains on the injured patient.

Medical malpractice is highly regulated by a complex body of rules and laws. Cliff Rieders, of Rieders, Travis, Humphrey, Waters & Dohrmann, wrote THE BOOK on medical malpractice in Pennsylvania. Medical Malpractice in Pennsylvania is the book that most lawyers and judges use to educate themselves. Cliff Rieders also teaches the course annually given by the Pennsylvania Association for Justice, formerly Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association, and by other organizations. Cliff has spent decades honing his skills and successfully representing Pennsylvania families who have suffered injury or loss due to medical and hospital negligence. We offer a free consultation.

Remember that Cliff Rieders also has a substantial practice in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation. These are also very important areas of the law, requiring great skill and knowledge.

What is Considered Medical and Hospital Malpractice?

According to Pennsylvania law, medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional commits medical negligence by violating the generally accepted standard of care that other medical professionals use to treat patients suffering from a disorder or illness. The medical negligence must have directly resulted in the patient’s injuries, so you and your attorney will have to prove that the negligent act caused the damage. One of the most difficult challenges is finding appropriate expert witnesses to testify. It is rare that a treating physician will help a patient, but it does happen. Cliff Rieders has dealt with hundreds of expert witnesses over the years.

What are Noneconomic Damages?

Pennsylvania defines “noneconomic loss” as pain and suffering and other nonmonetary detriment. Noneconomic damages usually fall into the following categories:

Pain and suffering: The law says that people who are injured are entitled to be fairly compensated for all physical pain, mental anguish, discomfort, inconvenience, and distress suffered. Compensation is figured from the date of the injury until the date of trial, plus compensation for injuries that are expected to be suffered in the future as a result.

Emotional distress and trauma: Seriously injured individuals often suffer great mental anguish, stress, and anxiety, especially if they are unable to work and become dependent on others. They may suffer flashbacks and panic attacks and have other mental issues that arise from the medical malpractice.

Embarrassment and humiliation: Injured individuals may suffer present and/or future embarrassment and humiliation due to their reduced ability to function or because they are disfigured, incapacitated, or unable to make decisions and take independent actions due to the medical malpractice.

Loss of enjoyment of life: Seriously injured individuals are often deprived of the pleasure of participating in social, athletic, and volunteer activities in the community with family members and friends. They may be unable to engage in a hobby that was pleasurable or enjoy doing things with children and grandchildren. They may suffer each time they attempt to perform the basic activities of daily life due to the medical malpractice.

Loss of consortium and companionship: Marriages, friendships and family relationships may be destroyed if individuals can no longer engage in the give and take and responsibilities of marriage, social, and family life.

Remember, there may also be a claim for consortium, loss of society and services for the spouse. Further, in death cases damages are governed by Pennsylvania’s Wrongful Death and Survival Action. There are cases where relatives who are “bystanders,” as the law defines that, may be entitled to damages for infliction of emotional distress. That is a very difficult and problematic area of the law.

How is Compensation Determined?

Since there is no easy way to calculate a dollar amount for what noneconomic damages are worth, the amount of the settlement or verdict will be based on several factors, including:

the age of the injured party

the type and severity of the injuries or disfigurements

how the injury affects the individual – the extent to which they can still perform previous activities and the effects on marriage, family, and social relationships

whether the injury is permanent or temporary, and whether there is treatment for the problems

the amount and duration of the pain and suffering

how the loss of life’s pleasures affects the person involved on a daily basis.

Since Pennsylvania does not have caps on compensatory and non-economic damages, there is no limit on how much a court can award you for these types of damages — if you and your attorney can prove that the damages were a result of the medical malpractice. Pennsylvania does, however, under unusual circumstances, grant remittitur and may reduce a verdict. There certainly are guidelines and rules concerning appropriate damage awards and settlement amounts.

Is There a Statute of Limitations?

The statute of limitations for medical and hospital malpractice claims is two (2) years. Pennsylvania also has something called a “tolling” or “discovery rule.” Under certain circumstances, the statute of limitations may be extended from the time when a person knew or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known of the relationship between the harm and its cause. This is an extremely complex area of the law. Cliff Rieders has written about it in his book on Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice. Pennsylvania also has a 7-year statute of repose. Likewise, this is a complex issue and does not necessarily extend the statute of limitations but may close the door where the discovery rule applies. A minor has two (2) years after reaching the age of 18 to bring a medical liability action. There is a different statute of limitations for sexual assault. The statute of limitations is one of the most difficult areas of the law. It is important to act quickly and diligently.

Put Your Trust in Us, Contact Cliff Rieders for a Free Consultation

If you or a loved one has suffered losses from medical malpractice, you must act quickly. Due to the statute of limitations and the fact that medical evidence can be destroyed over time, delaying action could mean forever losing your right to seek compensation. It is essential to have a skilled and knowledgeable medical malpractice lawyer who knows the judges, the courts, and the system, especially since noneconomic damages may be difficult to prove.

Whether in settlement negotiations or pursuing a favorable trial verdict, the experienced Pennsylvania medical malpractice attorney Cliff Rieders of Rieders, Travis, Humphrey, Waters & Dohrmann is familiar with the law and thoroughly prepared and committed to achieving a just outcome and getting you the compensation you deserve. With our sizeable staff, we offer strength in numbers while providing top-notch personal service.

If you or your loved one has suffered from medical malpractice, do not delay. Consult Cliff Rieders of Rieders, Travis, Humphrey, Waters & Dohrmann by calling 1-800-326-9259 for a free consultation, or use our online contact form.

Based in Williamsport, we serve clients throughout the state of Pennsylvania, offering a free consultation on all injury matters. More than that, we offer you experience, knowledge, compassion, and a long history of results.

The post Noneconomic Damages: What is Below the Tip of the Iceberg? appeared first on Rieders, Travis, Humphrey, Waters & Dohrmann.

0 notes