#there were a few that i considered (drive. prospect. original animated beauty and the beast)

[ioannemos]

tagged by @topazpearl 🥰

Post gifs of your top 10 movies without naming them and tag 10 people:

tagging @morfinwen @thepartyponies @sunheart @afoolofhope @millionsknives @knife-dad @dangerously-human @quonunc @burialuntrue2007 and the tenth tag is for anyone who wants an excuse to do this 🤎 i tag YOU!

[mohamadpros]

"The day after Thanksgiving: September 24, 1869, the day the business sectors smashed after a fizzled endeavor by a few agents to corner the gold market. Prompted the dejection."  Say what? 

Why on the planet would the greatest shopping day of the year be called something that indicates the market slamming and financial gloom? Ok! A marginally additionally look yields this definition: "The term Black Friday has been connected to the day in the wake of Thanksgiving, in which retailers influence enough deals to place themselves 'into the dark ink'." To affirm, that bodes well. Kind of.  I believe there's a whole other world to the story than meets the eye, however; a starting at yet unrevealed genuine significance to the expression "The shopping extravaganza following Thanksgiving".  I feel that the vast majority consider the day in the wake of Thanksgiving as the most exceedingly awful, most disappointing, and perilous day to go shopping. While a few diehards design a very long time ahead of time for their shopping wanders on that day (invest more energy, truth be told, than they do arranging their Thanksgiving Day menu), the greater part of us anticipate how to abstain from setting off to the store by any means, just to become involved with understanding that great arrangement, finding the best reserve funds, or basically going on the grounds that every other person is doing it.  For my situation, I endeavor to abstain from setting off to the store, any store, that whole end of the week. Indeed, I endeavor to abstain from driving at all that end of the week, particularly close to the shopping centers.  Regardless I ponder, however, why that Friday must be "dark". Why is it not called Green Friday for the cash that is made, or even Pink Friday for every one of the ladies will's identity shopping that day? It could even be called Red Friday for the slaughter (recollect the Cabbage Patch Doll calamity?). This is a day most declare to despise, so why "dark"? Clearly, the suggestion is that the Friday in the wake of Thanksgiving is by one means or another dull and malevolence. My point is that "dark" has been a shading considered terrible presumably since the get-go, and since we classify individuals regarding shading - dark, white, darker, red, yellow - dark as malicious is an issue.  We need to remember that words convey a great deal of weight. As authors/bloggers, we know the significance of picking the ideal word for any given sentence, yet we toss around generalization actuating phrases, for example, Black Friday, without much idea. However, how things are named has any kind of effect by they way they are dealt with.  For example, back when Columbus discovered the Caribbean, he assumed an extensive part in oppressing and mishandling the indigenous populace. At the point when news found its way back to Spain about what was occurring in "their" new property, a law was passed expressing that lone "awful Indians" could be oppressed and mishandled. From that minute on, the local Caribbeans were marked as barbarians, and consequently terrible. The greater part of the sudden, their abuse was overlooked, as well as endorsed by chapel and government.  Words are intense surely.  Where did this entire "dark is awful" thing originated from, in any case? How could it begin? Blessed messengers are constantly depicted as white, encompassed by splendid light. Most even have fair hair. The Middle-Eastern Jesus is depicted as white with blondish hair, as well. Is dark essentially the total inverse of white? On the off chance that light is great then dim must be awful?  Indeed, even kids' stimulation plays into the generalization. In Lion King, Simba, Lana, and Mufasa are for the most part brilliant in shading, with moderately lighter manes. Scar, then again, is darker in shading, with a darker mane, and kid was he insidious! Aladdin is a far and away superior illustration. All the great characters are light-cleaned and alluring, while all the abhorrent characters are dull and plain (we've advanced to incorporate "lovely" into the great class and "appalling" into the awful/malicious classification). Glenda the Good from The Wizard of Oz was lovely, encompassed by light, while the underhandedness Wicked Witch of the West wearing dark and was monstrous as, well, sin. These are visual signals for kids to have the capacity to recognize great from terrible in those motion pictures. Tragically, this idea extends into genuine living, where genuine lowlifess from time to time wear a dark cap or circled looking characteristically detestable. This puts our kids in danger. As a rule it's the light, the "beautiful", which is concealing the beast. In any case, that is another subject to explore at some other time.  So once more, where did this generalization start? Might it be able to originate from a period when there was no power, no streetlights to light up the night, only a fire pit to offer solace? I envision this is the situation. In the relatively recent past the night - dimness - held us in fear. Things occurred during the evening. When we were living in caverns, creatures would come during the evening and drag away our relatives. Nobody would wander out into dimness because of a paranoid fear of the obscure getting us and destroying us. Different Things occurred during the evening, as well. Individuals could get lost, fall into a gorge, or - god disallow - stub their toes while searching for somewhere to pee! Dimness was no companion to our diurnal progenitors.  Afterward, when we had flame light to light up the night, there was as yet the dimness outside to fear. Old stories had creatures that turned out just during the evening; vampires, werewolves (who required a full moon to change), incubi, and witches. Reality, as well, had its offer of unsafe evening time animals: Cats had eyes that gleamed and were astounding seekers (and as everybody knows, companions of witches); bats turned out just during the evening, and some sucked the blood of our domesticated animals; and shouldn't something be said about those chilling yells during the evening as wolves conveyed over the backwoods?  Considering what number of thousands of years we spent dreading the evening time, it's sort of justifiable that regardless we have a touch of instilled dread of haziness, even with all the nightlights on the planet pursuing without end the creatures.  This is most likely why Europeans were perplexed when they saw ethnic minorities. Their way of life, which included divine beings as light creatures and devils as tenants of the dull, modified them into trusting that darker skin tone and abnormal social practices (bear in mind dread of the obscure!) made these individuals malicious, or at any rate, not as much as human. We know better at this point. I don't think our generalization of high contrast being insidious and great has anything to do with skin tone any longer. I believe it's about dread of the dimness itself.  However, our dread of the dim, these days, is unwarranted. While it's actual that it's less demanding for peril to stow away oblivious, say a mugger covering up in the shadows or an attacker stowing away in the shrubs, the haziness itself isn't malevolent. However the main thing we as a whole do when we return home late around evening time, me included, is turn on a few lights; more than is expected to see where we're going. We turn the lights on for comfort. What do our advanced, 21st century minds fear now? Most likely we don't in any case fear vampires, witches, and werewolves, gracious my!  I assume, being human, our greatest dread is demise. At the point when individuals pass on, we close their eyes. When we close our own particular eyes, we see haziness. Well... when we close our eyes its dim, so dead individuals must be oblivious, hence obscurity has a remark with death, and we don't comprehend passing, so since we don't comprehend it, we fear it. Ok! Presently we're getting some place! 

We don't comprehend it.  What we truly fear, at that point, is the obscure. Furthermore, what is more obscure than our internal identities, our mystery creatures? Maybe the obscurity we truly fear is simply the murkiness. Our mystery evil spirits live somewhere down in the obscurity we call our brains. We can't see them; it's excessively dim, however we know they're there. Once in a while they make their quality known. As Dexter would state, they are our Dark Passengers.  We've all gotten ourselves stretched as far as possible at some time in life. A few of us snap, let that Dark Passenger free, and our lives are everlastingly demolished. More often than not we figure out how to control the evil presence inside, keep him prowling in the obscurity of our psyches, concealed protected and sound. Simply being reminded that he's there, however, thus exceptionally solid, alarms us.  Which brings us full hover: This, as I would see it, is the reason the Friday in the wake of Thanksgiving is called "The shopping extravaganza following Thanksgiving". The day, when dropped into a shopping center or Super Center, we as a whole enable our Dark Passengers to come join the fun; and that, without a doubt, is an exceptionally alarming prospect.