#the later seasons try to explore this more and also seem to humanize CSM (which is interesting) but in doing so seems to validate him as

[limnsaber]

To explain what I was talking about late late last night but ended up talking around: The X Files wonderfully embodies a spectrum of human emotion, but to me, does none so as well as the way it talks about wonder and love.

On the part of love it says: the truths we look for are in other people. The way we love other people is how we win. Not out of fear but out of love and the bonds we have with each other are the most important truth we can hope to know.

On the part of wonder the X Files says: to look into the unknown is so wonderfully human. To gaze at the stars and wonder at what we find there is human nature. To search for truth -- the truths of the universe, of the unknown, the truths between me and you, is wonderfully, essentially human. It's part of our nature to search for these things and Samantha is the heart of this. Aside from Samantha's disappearance being the inciting event of the show, she is the embodiment of this mystery. To wonder at the stars knowing she's up there, to search for the truth and find greater ones in turn -- Samantha is the key to this.

So to kill her off as an aside just to reach 'closure'; to make her nothing more than a victim rather than the person who invites and embodies for both Mulder and Scully the part that's so achingly unknown seemed like a horrible tragedy to me. Where did it go. Was the truth we found human cruelty??? Was that it the whole time????

In s4-s5 and Fight the Future, it seemed that we inched ever nearer to finding Samantha. It was teased that she was alive: that like the truths we hoped to find, she was still out there, waiting. There was a point at which the extraterrestrial mirrored the human. FTF and these middle seasons almost seemed to say: no, there is no fundamental difference between extraterrestrial and human cruelty. The extraterrestrial forces were in conflict just the same way human forces were. Samantha was sent away embodying the hopes of humanity, however horrible that decision was. Of course, we can't ignore that Samantha was a victim, and the later seasons of the X Files lean into this. Abduction is a violent act, and what Scully, Samantha, and the MUFON women went through was horrible. I really would've loved it if they explored this more, but they didn't, and still there's this contrariness to Samantha's abduction.

It's said in FTF that Bill Mulder held two hopes -- that Mulder would uncover the abuse of the Syndicate and reveal the truth, and that Samantha would be allowed the chance to survive and would be able to give that to the world. There were extraterrestrial rebels fighting against colonization and the Syndicate the same way Mulder and Scully do. This contrariness, this uncertainty, is part of the X Files too.

Samantha's abduction always implied that she would be returned. We were teased that she would be found. Over and over, we are told that she is alive, that she is still out there for Mulder to find. Whether she was a human test subject or off in the stars, the truth was living and breathing, waiting to be found.

The X Files says the truth is out there, that looking to the stars is part of the human experience, that our connections to each other are so fundamental to our worldview and that they enable us to endure anything. The X Files is wonder at the heart, the intersection of the unknown and known, and that the truth is each other. Samantha was Scully and Mulder's first step to that truth. Even with everything that they endured, the wonder and love that is the motivating force of everything that we see is inextinguishable. Samantha is the vessel for these beliefs.

Retconning Samantha Mulder from her place embodying the hopes and dreams of humanity, however horribly that came about, to a child that was abused until she died weakens the sentiments at the heart of The X Files.

yk i’m at the point that i literally don’t accept s7e11 “closure” as canon. it makes me ANGRY now because the more i look at all the past seasons and everything they’ve done with the samantha arc and how important it’s been to mulder’s character, it just defaces and denies all of it. it just- it’s not fair. after all mulder has been through to continue to believe that samantha was abducted just for it to be thrown out the window? for him to accept it finally in a way which was supposed to be meaningful and big but altogether uncharacteristic and hollow? it’s like they tried to abide by paper hearts ideologies but through a seemingly unnessary dark meandering of new paranormalities. it also creates so much more inconsistency along with what we started to see from s5 and beyond in the samantha plot, it doesn’t explain it. for instance, in the colony arc, the samantha-looking clones say “how could we know so much about her” and WHO if not samantha is this woman they were modeled after??? did the clones just grow old from the little samantha’s on that bee farm thing so they knew what she’d age like?? IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE!!! IT’S NOT ENOUGH!! CC YOU CANT GET AWAY THAT EASY!!

[attendantdesign-blog]

New Post has been published on Attendantdesign

New Post has been published on https://attendantdesign.com/this-borg-cube-makes-your/

This Borg Cube makes your

No, it’s no longer the handiest glowing cube PC you may buy.

But it is probably the only one with the intention to try to take in your humanity into its cybernetic collective thoughts. This is the Borg Cube, a formally licensed Star Trek laptop with an as an alternative distinct chassis. And it is no longer pretty much the seems: This PC appears remarkably small considering the amazing components you will find internal. (Disclosure: Star Trek owner CBS is also CNET’s parent agency.)

According to its creators,

the “Borg CubeVR” gaming PC you spot above will measure simply 12 inches (30.5cm) on an aspect, and a smaller Borg Cube centered at media facilities may be an eighth the scale at 6 by way of 6 by using 6 inches (or 15 via 15 through 15 centimeters).

Intriguingly, in addition, they inform CNET what you are seeing isn’t only a plastic shell around a steel frame — they declare to have created an interlocking layout where the walls themselves can act because of the structure of the chassis.

Borg-cube-Cherrytree–sizes The Borg Cube comes in sizes. Martin Roth/Cherrytree They’re both restrained-version items, unluckily. To commemorate the conflict of Wolf 359 (where the Borg destroyed the Federation Armada), they’ll be promoting simply 359 devices of each version, inside the US and Europe, starting on September 26, proper here.

Prices start at $599 (more or less £460 or AU$755) for the access-level model with a Core i3 processor, 8GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD, and it sounds just like the sky is the limit for the Borg CubeVR, so as to feature up to 2 GPUs, a water-cooled 22-center Xeon processor, 64GB of RAM and room for six SSDs.

Here are all the specifications we’ve thus far:

Borg Cube, $599

Intel Core i3-7100 twin-centre three.9GHz processor Integrated pics Asus H110S2/CSM mini-STX motherboard 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws memory 128GB M.2 2280 SATA III storage Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 Wi-Fi 120W outside strength supply Windows 10 Home (Linux is alternative) 6 by 6 through 6-inch injection-molded polycarbonate chassis Borg Cube, $899 (roughly £690, AU$1, a hundred thirty)

Intel Core i5-7600K quad-center three.8GHz processor Integrated photos Asus H110S2/CSM mini-STX motherboard 16GB Crucial DDR4 2133 reminiscence 500GB Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 Wi-Fi 120W external strength deliver Windows 10 Home (Linux is an option) 6 with the aid of 6 by way of 6-inch injection-molded polycarbonate chassis Borg CubeVR, starting spec

Intel Core i5-7600K quad-center three.8GHz processor EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB photographs Asus ROG Strix Z270G Gaming micro-ATX motherboard 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000 reminiscence 500GB Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD 850W EVGA Supernova 850 G3 modular energy supply Optional Blu-Ray power CPU water cooling Green illuminated fanatics, keyboard, and mouse 12 by means of 12 via 12-inch (30 via 30 via 30cm), zero.6-inch (1.5-cm) thick polyoxymethylene chassis Extruded aluminum 6-slot SSD bay Removable wall with transparent aspect panel underneath Windows 10 Home (Windows 10 Pro is an option) Taboola Sponsored Links by using YOU MAY ALSO LIKE The 9 Best Practices for Developers to Manage Their Own Code PagerDuty Inc. This Rs. 2,000 ‘Desktop PC’ Could Be the Computer You Need Sponsored by means of devices.Ndtv.Com Australian women want Muslim men to fertilize them, cause them to happy: Halal food leader Sponsored by India Today 1/4 BHK Ready To Move In Apts, Starts @36 Lacs in Pallikaranai, Chennai Sponsored via Puravankara Share your voice 6 COMMENTS Tags Desktops Star Trek

More stories

AMD Ryzen 3 paves the way for cheap  your PCs this excursion season Cube  Borg 

Acer adds AMD Ryzen power to budget gaming computer systems

HP’s computers get a down-low makeover with new CPUs, web cams

Best Desktops of 2017

CLOSE Discuss: This Borg Cube makes your pc besides the point Guidelines Log In Please log in to CNET to remark Post Comment As…

Next Article: Mozilla CEO: A ‘massive bang’ is coming

Mozilla CEO says new Firefox browser delivers ‘a massive bang’ Three years after taking on the enterprise at the back of the Firefox browser, Chris Beard talks approximately fighting the megacorps and taking on Chrome with Firefox 57.

Tech Industry

Stephen Shankland mugshot by Stephen Shankland August 4, 2017 5:00 AM PDT @stshank Mozilla CEO Chris Beard Mozilla CEO Chris Beard in his Mountain View, California, workplace. James Martin/CNET Chris Beard grabbed hold of Mozilla’s reins at some stage in a rough time.

In the spring of 2014, Mozilla becomes looking to take on the 2 cellular software program superpowers, Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS, with its personal Firefox OS. At the equal time, its Firefox browser for PCs changed into losing users to Google’s Chrome browser. If that wasn’t hard enough, the nonprofit corporation changed into rocked to its roots when co-founder Brendan Eich stops the CEO job after a pretty visible gay-marriage controversy.

Mozilla’s new Firefox hopes Inside Mozilla: Firefox fights again Bid your swoopy Firefox tabs goodbye, starting now Mozilla beats its Rust language will make your net safer Mozilla 3 years later: Is Firefox in a higher area? So Beard, an early Mozilla executive, turned into tapped to assist pull the corporation through the crisis.

A quiet govt who can pause for an uncomfortably long time as he cautiously considers how he’ll solve a question, Beard, forty-four, do not hesitate in showing his passion for Mozilla’s software and mission. He first joined Mozilla in 2004 whilst the browser team had simply 10 personnel, and he led Firefox advertising and different projects for years. He left in 2013 for a stint as entrepreneur-in-house at undertaking capital firm Greylock Partners. After Mozilla’s control cataclysm, he left a new startup to return to Mozilla’s Mountain View, California, headquarters. His interim CEO appointment quickly became everlasting. Beard says he knew he needed to take on the job.

“I saw a real threat in Mozilla now not surviving,” Beard said in an exceptional interview. “I additionally knew how important Mozilla is inside the global. I knew how a good deal capacity there has been.”

During his three-12 months tenure, Mozilla ditched Firefox OS, commenced overhauling Firefox, made over financially vital partnerships with on line search groups, made its first acquisition and invested in new regions like virtual fact.

His job now: Get us all to care about Firefox once more. Usage of the browser has diminished in current years — even though Mozilla says it is now strong with greater than 100 million day by day users — and the opposition is fiercer than ever, with Chrome main the market. Beard is prepared for the fight, readying a new version of Firefox this is due in November and that goal to influence us that the web is better impartial, not under the control of Google and a handful of other tech giants.

  It’s time to root for underdog browser Firefox — again

AUTOPLAY: ONOFF 1:12 “Where we have been a success in the past is more as a provocateur — an agent of right representing the humans,” he stated. “Just being that opposing pressure inside the atmosphere can result in excellent. It could be loopy to head up against Google or Apple or Facebook. But we have a function to play to keep the device a bit greater honest and a bit extra open.”

Beard talked about Firefox fifty-seven and what the future holds, together with a club plan that might supply Mozilla fanatics new offerings and benefits — and convey new sales to the enterprise.

Here’s an edited transcript of our verbal exchange.

Q: Hundreds of thousands and thousands of us use Firefox, but people aren’t as acquainted with Mozilla. Give me the huge-picture view. Beard: At the case of the browser wars [of the ’90s], the final man status changed into Microsoft. Then Microsoft laid off the browser crew. It turned into like in delusion tales in which the evil Emperor involves electricity via a few deceptive approach, the blue skies depart and all of the demons and trolls abruptly take root. There were not a variety of exciting matters going on on the web or the net at that time.

Mozilla’s cause rolled out of the state of affairs. Who’s going to rise up and try to do something about this? We should do something higher than IE [Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser] and we should help the web and the net attain its capacity.

Our task on the time, while Mozilla genuinely got here collectively, turned into to promote desire and innovation inside the face of that environment. The method becomes to excite human beings — to give human beings a product that showed what was possible — and on the same time, bring about a higher atmosphere. We now body it in phrases of making sure the net is open and available to all, it’s wholesome, and it’s desirable. Mozilla’s an enterprise that’s all approximately ensuring that man or woman humans have a better online existence and a higher online experience. They’re on top of things in their revel in.

You succeeded in the IE war by using reigniting browser competition and moving browsers forward with pop-up blocking, tabs, and other overall performance and safety features. But that turned into them. Who’s the evil empire now? Beard: At the time, no one notion Microsoft was going to simply roll over. When we released Firefox 1.0, even once we executed some success, we regularly heard, “You men are loopy. The 800-pound gorilla is going to crush you.” We do not have the audacity to take credit score for the Cambrian explosion of the internet. Back when Firefox launched, there wasn’t YouTube or Twitter or Facebook.

Then you saw the upward thrust of mobile platforms. We have been hyper-centered on the web war and overdue to embracing cellular. Now one or two businesses essentially manipulate what you can do, what you could publish and what you could devour. And this is counter to the promise of the internet.