#the Cybersmith

[pixeljade]

I fucking love the Human Pet Guy, and that literally everyone just knows him as the Human Pet Guy. Its just so fucking funny to me. This guy could leave the internet, or rebrand, or do any number of things to stop being known as the Human Pet Guy, but instead he just continues to show up saying the most utterly bizarre shit to other people and we all just go

[alledherlu-q-pereon]

I have beef with human pet guy.

[correctopinionhaver]

you gotta give it to him this does go kinda hard

[k8rgrl]

Have y'all actually like,, seen human pet guy? My sister compared him to a 1920s oil baron and like... She's right. Behold, Cybersmith himself, human pet guy

[loving-n0t-heyting]

I hope things aren't too bad for you?

There was a point this year where I seriously thought I'd have to leave my chosen career. Now I'm employed in my field, making more money than I used to.

If the academia plan doesn't work out, it's their loss, not yours. Soon, they'll lose their intellectual monopsony, as their illuminati financiers are arreested by the Q patriots.

The kind of discussions you want to be involved in will happen in all sorts of new places.

Keep going.

Please.

heh, thx :3

[lumpyflakycum]

The reason why my follows are private is that i secretely follow the cybersmith. This is purely anthropological, mind, and i do not endorse — him. I just think that without his influence i would be a man far more ignorant of the minds on this earth

[doomed-jester]

What

[leshynade]

Holy shit he found me

[derseprinceoftbd]

It's so deeply deeply sad that if you dig into Cybersmith lore he is exposed as obvious satire. Like the moment I saw him saying "fr*cking" everything else just lost its lustre. Like now *at best* he's like a Hussie or Jreg, like a half-man-half-The-Bit type deal.

[mint-mumbles]

Guys… who approved his blazed post…

Linking to this wonderful post debunking Cybersmith

(Here’s his main points for those morbidly curious:)

Who’s gonna tell him about NUCLEAR WEAPON RESTRICTIONS?

Have bans on actual functional, working technologies EVER been successful?

YES! YES THEY HAVE!

[semi-pseudo-quasi-serious]

I am dying to know what the cybersmith thinks of the Charles portrait. On the one hand, staunch monarchist. On the other hand, modern art. On the one hand, libs hate it. On the other hand, a non-trad artist painted it.

What I'm wondering is, really, what's the worst take that can be had about this?!

[correctopinionhaver]

the cybersmith is tumblr's diogenes

[burgerking-official]

the cybersmith on his way to reblog a porn bot with the caption “boobies!!”

[loving-n0t-heyting]

At what point do we say that cassandra was right?

How much evidence is needed to justify a prophecy?

You (well, not you specifically, but left-wingers in general) say that the Krondstadt rebels were all "reactionaries" for fearing that the soviets would ruin the economy... but the soviets DID ruin the economy!

You (again, general "you") say the Rhodesians/Afrikaners were all "racists"for feating that Mugabe/Mandela would cause inflation and infrastructure collapse... but that all actually happened!

If the eventuality you were concerned about comes true, clearly you weren't just being unreasonably paranoid!

When can we say that these people were right?

by virtually all standard measures, stalin-era soviet modernisation initiated a meteoric economic rise in the regions governed by the ussr; its quite easy to find the rocketship-after-29 charts, its why the stalinists love to pull em out. the economic trajectory of revolutionary china is similar. this is all just common knowledge

describing the economic policies of robert mugabe and nelson mandela in the same breath is either dishonest or deeply ignorant; it is hard to imagine post-apartheid economic models more divergent than those of the zimbabwe dictatorship otoh and the anc post-94 oto. you should know this

questions about the mgmt of SA infrastructure services and systems (like, most notoriously, the electric grid) after 1994 are very complicated and fraught and im uncomfortable weighing in on the subtleties. comparing in rudimentary better-or-worse terms their record before and after political emancipation, however, is not a subtlety, which is why it always baffles me when its brought up. eskom (eg) could afford to be more "reliable" to its consumers before the early 90s bc at the time barely a third of the population had access to electricity. the details of the legacy of increased electricity accessibility since the end of apartheid are above my pay grade, but idt anyone disputes that eskom has managed to significantly increase coverage since blacks were recognised as real citizens. complaining about the "collapse" of south african electricity infrastructure after the imposition of political democracy makes sense, again, only if you just dont care about the great majority of south africans. it feels sort of ridiculous to even have to make this point, frankly, but ppl keep trotting it out!!

im done w this topic fn

[string-cheese-cake]

The cybersmith is posting cringe poetry on main and you wanna know the worst part?

He's spending money on it

[catspores]

the-cybersmith (Human Pet Guy) looks like if a coconut got gajinka'd in the 1930s