#taqiya

[biarritzzz]

Reminder that apostates or ex muslims as they love to call themselves can’t ever be trusted.

They have the same mindset as their practicing fellow muslims and will always side with their own culture/ethnic group when push comes to shove.

[curious-07]

Si Cacing dan Kotoran Kesayangannya #2 : Makna Kebahagiaan dalam Buddisme (review Taqiya Mir'atul Waro')

Buku ini ditulis oleh seorang biksu asal Inggris bernama Ajahn Brahm. Buku ini diterbitkan pada 2011 oleh awareness publication, didalamnya terdapat 108 cerpen mengandung pesan moral dibumbui dengan ajaran budisme. Total halaman atau keseluruhan isi buku ini adalah ± 340 halaman.

Banyak pelajaran yang dapat diambil dari buku ini, karena sebagian besar cerita adalah pengalaman Ajahn Brahm dan kisah nyata lainnya. Namun saya juga sangat mengapresiasi beliau karena mengisahkan beberapa kisah kuno seperti kisah Nasruddin Koja, seorang filsuf dari bangsa Seljuk. Keaslian cerita ini menggugah jiwa pembaca sehingga pelajaran yang ada dapat dengan mudah dipetik.

Alur dari penulisannyapun cenderung monoton. Setiap cerpen akan diberikan judul, kemudian cerita dimulai, hingga diakhiri dengan relevansi ajaran Budha.

Ramuan utama buku ini adalah kebahagiaan. Buku ini adalah jawaban dan pembimbing bagi mereka yang memiliki masalah dengan jiwa, katakanlah seperti kebencian, balas dendam, kesedihan, dan sifat negatif lainnya yang tentu saja menghantui rusuk manusia. Oleh karena itu buku ini berfokus pada penerimaan diri dan orang lain, agar seimbang. Melalui cerpen berjumlah 108, agaknya sangat cocok sebagai media pembelajaran agar pembaca mudah memahami ajaran Budha.

[misanthropiccatboy]

if you want the actual answer as to why the kabbalah is a "closed practice" it's specifically because of shabbatai tzvi. the kabbalah was p widely practiced until he started a heretical sect as a messiah figure, and then converted to islam when threatened with execution. he caused such an enormous theological disaster across the entire world, and because his influence was largely legitimized by the kabbalah, kabbalists afterwards decided that they had to close off the practice to prevent another theological disaster like this. (if you're curious about his legacy, there are still in fact sabbateans living in secret in turkey. their exact number is unknown because they also practice something like taqiya to avoid persecution). nowadays tho it isn't really as "closed" as it used to be (largely in response to the disastrous consequence of the holocaust on jewish communities), and a lot of texts that have traditionally been kept esoteric are now in fact available in print and online, and translated as well. of course who can actually identify as a "kabbalist" is still its own matter, but it's not like you can't just like. read the texts and learn the history if you want to

it's SO funny to just decide to convert when threatened with execution for heresy. I cannot even imagine the drama that would have caused in the Jewish community. I love the words "theological disaster" and will incorporate them into my vocabulary. Thank you for this information

[bobemajses]

King Ahashverush and the maidens, from a Persian Jewish manuscript, 17th century.

The Jewish community was a very ancient Persian community and its prolonged contact with the Persian culture produced profound acculturation, especially in literature and applied arts. The period of the production of these Judeo-Persian manuscripts coincides with a very difficult time of anti-Jewish persecutions: a number of anti-Jewish incidents took place during the reign of Shah Abbas II. Along with Jews, Sufis as well as other religious minorities, such as Armenian Christians and Zoroastrians were also targets of religious intolerance. Most of the major Jewish communities appear to have converted in 1656, and their members became anusim (“forced converts”) for about seven years, outwardly complying with Shiite Islam while practicing Judaism in secret. A practice ironically similar to that of taqiya (dissimulation), followed by the Shiites for many centuries. The events are retraced in the Ketāb-e anusi, “The book of Converts” by Bābāʿi ben Lotf, a Jewish witness in Kashan.

[holyfigtree]

Nizar Banat on Iranian support of Palestinian resistance

"To those [Palestinians] who disapprove of Iran, where did you get your rockets from habibi? Don't you applaud the rockets and cheer for them in support of the resistance? Where did you get the rockets that protected Gaza from? You should be ashamed of yourselves!

They say that Iran "exploits the Palestinian Cause to spread Shi'ism" If so, why would it bother with 42+ years of sanctions? Several hundred million of its dollars confiscated, and yet it still takes from its people's food to support and sustain the Palestinian resistance. They don't have to do that. Iran is the only country in the world that has a permanent clause in its budget, from the budget of Iranian people's bread, that pledges support to the Palestinian revolution, regardless of its orientation, whether it was Fatah, the PFLP, the communists, anyone! It never intervened in our ideological conceptions of resistance. It says, "Take, take, become a man and fight"

Iran's problem with America is not new. It did not start with the so-called "Syrian revolution", with all due respect, you bunch of [redacted]! Iran's problem with America started in 1953, when America led a coup d'état against the government of Mosaddeq, and against the will of the Iranian people, who kicked out the shah in 1953, America and Britain came and planned the coup and reinstated the shah, in cooperation with the Mossad.

Iran's vengeance started a long time ago; but it is a nation with dignity and honor, and knows clearly that the American presence is the problem, that the Israeli presence is the problem […]

Iran is your partner culturally, historically, geographically, and religiously, whether you like it or not, they are our partners, and it is their right to lead this current phase [of struggle]. As Arabs, you betrayed all your historical responsibilities, you betrayed your national responsibility and your Islamic responsibility, you even betrayed your linguistic responsibilities and now Iranians speak your language better than you do. What do you have to offer? Come on, go ahead.

There's a fundamental rule in politics: if you do not have your own plan, then you are forced to accept being a part of others' plans, especially since you have nothing to offer. What do you have to offer, our beloved Sunni family? To be a lackey for the Americans, like the rule of the Gulf? No. You have to come with your own plan and be an active member of the new axis that Iran has been building for 40 years and paid for with blood and a 42 year long siege.

Part of this deformed feeling carried by a lot of people against Iran is the result of an inferiority complex among Arabs, where the Arab feels stepped on by other nations. He thinks the Iranian does not deserve to rise. Well the Turk is rising, why aren't you rising against him? The Turk ruled you and humiliated you and the prints of the Turkish boot are seen all over this great Arab homeland so why shouldn't the Iranian rise? [...] you will not find anything more stupid than this. It is utterly infuriating.

So, you are not impressed by the Iranian project, right? What could possibly impress you? What is the alternative? The lines of those who want to head into a peace process? And how? First we destroy our relationship with Syria, then Iran, and then we go, "Well, we cannot defeat Israel through war, war is futile and destructive, and no one supports us!" You are hypocrites! I swear on the blood of all martyrs, I swear on the blood of Wadee' Haddad the Christian, Soleimani the Shia, and Ahmad Yassin the Sunni, I swear on the blood of all three, that you are liars, and that we the Sunnis are the biggest hypocrites and most guilty of taqiya. So please, as we say in colloquial Palestinian, cut the [redacted]

Your job is to fortify society against the spread of defeatist thought […] Iran is a country that's been living under sanction for over 40 years. Based on what right does America besiege it? Do you accept the American sanctions? Is it enough for you that Iran and its allies managed to drive out the American and the French from Lebanon in 1983? The mighty men of Hezbollah in Lebanon blew up the marines base and killed around 400 American and French soldiers. The number was tremendous! They expelled every single one of them, and Hezbollah managed to focus their fight against the Israelis. This is manhood. These are people who think, and know how to plan, and know exactly when to execute the deadly blow.

Iran has been successful in its battles, and has been working, principally, for 42 years to expel the Americans and the Israelis from this region. Not for the purpose of taking their place, but to deter their evil! And you still dare to speak of "an Iranian project"? It is actually more than enough that they've managed to protect themselves while living next to this moronic Arab neighbor.

And again, where is your "Sunni nation"? How many [weapons] did you receive through Jordan? Your Sunni nation refuses to perform its duties towards you while sending thousands of fighters to Syria, and under what pretext? "We want to topple bashar al-assad"—who was not embroiled in any peace process—"we want to topple him and then head to free Palestine!" Well, you did topple him momentarily from dara'a, the golan heights, and other areas bordering israel… what was the result, O fans of Al-Nusra front? the result was that al-nusra front militants received medical treatment in israeli field hospitals.

So please…our beloved supporters of all factions, Haj Fouad Shubaki and Captain Omar Akkawi, are still in [Israeli] prisons. the heroes of karine A, the arms ship that was sent by General Soleimani to Fatah during the second intifada, at the time when every single arab regime helped in besieging Arafat, except for Syria. Be ashamed of yourselves.

Our condolences to this great nation for the martyrdom of its heroes. Together we fight for emancipation of the land and the human. But to achieve that, the Arab nation has to be cleansed from this class of compradors who have been taking over a large space in society, the compradors of idiocy, the compradors of NGOs, the compradors of sectarian strife, and the compradors of defeatist thought."

— Martyr Nizar Banat

Nizar Banat was one of the most prominent activists opposing the Palestinian National Authority. He was beaten to death by Palestinian National Authority police on June 24th, 2021 after being taken into custody.

[fridagentileschi]

Coltellatore siriano in un parco giochi ad Annecy. Francia. Diverse persone sono rimaste ferite, due bambini piccoli sono ancora in pericolo di vita.

Quando è finalmente abbastanza? Quanta gente deve ancora subire e morire per espellere tutta questa gentaglia importata? E non fatevi trarre in inganno. Questa bestia è un musulmano non un cristiano. Sono decenni che stanno cominciando a farsi passare per cristiani o yazidi per entrare nei nostri paesi e commettere atrocità. Al taqiya: dissimulazione permessa dal corano. ma sono e rimangono musulmani.

Un cristiano non rispetta il Corano.

[braveclementine]

October 14: Lingerie Kink (Kingsley Shacklebolt)❤️

Warnings: Mostly just fluff

Copyright: I do not own Kingsley Shacklebolt or any other Harry Potter/Wizarding World Characters. I also do not condone this being copied.

You laid on the bed, waiting for Kingsley to come home from his dangerous job at the Ministry. Ever since he had become Minister, the death threats had increased and it was starting to slowly worry you day by day. It had also started affecting his work hours, working longer and longer hours before coming home later and later, collapsing into bed with you, but not doing anything.

But today was supposed to be one of the shorter days, and so you had donned his favorite purple (obviously) lingerie.

Kingsley didn't look like he'd have many kinks in bed, nor did his friendly demeanor say anything about him. And to be fair, he honestly didn't. Perhaps because of his very strict upbringing or perhaps because he believed having any kinks were inappropriate in bed or heck, maybe having kinks were against his religion- you didn't know.

But the one thing you did know was that whether or not he admitted it, Kingsley had a lingerie kink.

So that was what led you to now, lying in the purple lace, silk garters, knee high lilac stockings, and your hair curled and put into a bun.

You were laying on your stomach, one leg bent, ass up, reading a Herbology book to learn more about the plants you were growing outside in the backyard of the modest house. Humming to 'Stressed out' by Twenty-one pilots, you read deeper into how to care for your strawberries.

The whoosh of the fireplace in the living room signaled you to let you know that Kingsley was home.

You flicked the page of the book, knowing that he would eat what you left him on the kitchen table, before he would go to the bathroom to brush, then come through the door to the bedroom.

He followed that routine to the exact dot and you looked up innocently, biting your bottom lip lightly as he came out.

He was still wearing his Agbada ceremonial gown and his Kota trousers. However, he was no longer wearing his Taqiya cap.

"Welcome home darling." You murmured quietly.

He removed the golden hoop from his ear, dark cheeks darker with flush. "Did you have a good day babe?"

His deep voice was so alluring and enchanting. You could listen to it forever. It rang with calm and authority. No wonder he'd been voted as temporary and then term Minister.

"It was slow." You admitted. "I couldn't wait for you to get home."

"Yes, I can see that," He gave that low chuckle that I had fallen for immediately, removing the Agbada next, hanging it up so it wouldn't get wrinkled, putting it on the left side of the closet with the other ones that would have to be washed with care. The Kota trousers however were pitched into the dirty laundry basket without care.

His deeply muscular chest and muscles were revealed now. You wouldn't have expected him to be so muscular underneath, but he was huge. He might've been taken as a body builder in the Muggle world.

He came to stand in front of you, slipping the book from your hands, setting it down gently on the nightstand.

You sat up on your knees, excited. He chuckled, slowly lowering his lips to kiss you sweetly. Everything was so sweet with Kingsley. He absolutely adored you, taking his time with you, but not in a way to tease you. He simply was always focused on making you feel good.

"You look stunning baby." He murmured, kissing softly down your neck. "You just had to choose purple, didn't you?"

"It's your favorite colour, I knew you'd like it." You grinned as you pressed returning kisses to his strong shoulders.

He chuckled, laughter vibrating from the curve of your hip through your body. He pushed you carefully back into the bed sheets, crawling over you.

He took his time, kissing every inch of skin he could reach, fingers brushing lightly over the lingerie. Your breathing was shallow, staring up at his lovely brown eyes that stared back at you with pure love and adoration.

Kingsley was a little older than you. He'd been in his last year when you were in your first year. You'd actually despised each other at first. He was constantly getting you in trouble- being Head-boy- and you hated it. It felt like he was picking on you. Eventually the two of you had met again in the Auror department and worked alongside each other. A few years later you were married.

You'd been through everything together. In the Order together, on the run together, and had fought at the Battle of Hogwarts together. Now, you were both settled down, your oldest child was in the Ministry already and your youngest child was at Hogwarts.

His lips kissed right between the valley of your breasts. You sighed, content. Your skin was tingling, feeling every kiss he'd placed on you. The only place untouched was the curve of your hip on the right side, as that was where you had been stabbed during the war. Curtesy of Bellatrix Lestrange who wasn't content with simple spell work.

Kingsley always left that spot for last, always the sign that he was going to move on from being sweet to making love to you.

His fingers unclipped the garters from your stockings, pulling them off of you to discard on the floor. He always pulled the garters off, leaving you only in the lacy number. He grinned, showing off his pure white teeth. You still hadn't learned his secret to his perfect teeth.

"Beautiful baby." He murmured, moving his hands along the lace, feeling it between his fingers. He slowly pulled your knickers down your legs, before setting them aside carefully, placing them in the drawer with his other favorite sets of lingerie- all purple except for one navy blue set. Then he kissed the one and only hicky to the spot on your hip.

The lingerie paid off.

[turtlemagnum]

i hope, one day, other people will be as feral for my characters as i am. i think the metric for if i've finally made it will be when people draw them in their specific cultural clothes, like goku. when i see agon in a taqiya, that's when i'll know i've made it

[buzz-london]

WHO WAS BEHIND THE CHRISTMAS MARKET ATTACK IN GERMANY? - 26 Dec 2024

In this video, Harris Sultan breaks down the shocking Magdeburg Christmas market attack and the chilling details about the perpetrator, Talib al-Abdulmohsin—a Saudi ex-Muslim who carried out this horrific act. From the history of Christmas markets to the broader implications for Western policies, Harris provides a comprehensive analysis, debunking conspiracies and tackling difficult questions about Islam, ex-Muslims, and extremism.

With over 200 injured and lives lost, including a 9-year-old child, this tragedy raises urgent concerns about radicalisation, mental health, and immigration policies. Was Abdulmohsin a genuine ex-Muslim or someone practising Taqiya? What role did his delusions and anger towards the German government play?

[korrektheiten]

Assad gestürzt – Taqiya-Moslems an der Macht?

Ansage: »Ich bin ja ein großer Fan von Einzeilern. „Die Börse hat freundlich auf die Bombardierung Kiews reagiert“ zum Beispiel. Oder: „Betritt ein Sprachbehinderter einen Twitter-Space…“ Manche Einzeiler präsentieren in einer wunderbaren Präzision einen fundamentalen Widerspruch, der wie der rosa Elefant im Raum oder die Bäume im Wald eigentlich für jeden sichtbar ist – aber eben […] The post Assad gestürzt – Taqiya-Moslems an der Macht? first appeared on ANSAGE. http://dlvr.it/TGgJny «

[rasalhague888]

Taqiya vs. Kol Nidre

User: Taqiya. ChatGPT: "Taqiya" (also spelled "taqiyya") is an Islamic term that refers to a practice where a person conceals their beliefs or religious identity in situations where revealing them could lead to persecution, harm, or danger. It is primarily associated with Shia Islam, where the concept has been more prominently discussed due to the historical persecution faced by Shia Muslims.

In essence, taqiya allows for the preservation of life and faith in circumstances where outwardly expressing one's true beliefs could result in severe consequences. While more commonly linked to Shia jurisprudence, some Sunni scholars also recognize the practice in situations of extreme duress.

The principle behind taqiya is rooted in the protection of individual well-being and survival, rather than deceit. It is often misunderstood or mischaracterized as encouraging dishonesty, but in its proper context, taqiya is a strategy for survival in the face of existential threats. User: If the beliefs are benevolent, then why the fear of severe consequences for their expression? ChatGPT: The fear of severe consequences for expressing benevolent beliefs arises from the fact that the social, political, and historical contexts in which these beliefs are expressed may not always be tolerant or accepting of differing viewpoints, regardless of their inherent nature. Benevolent beliefs may be perceived as a threat by those in power, dominant religious or cultural groups, or authoritarian regimes. Even peaceful or ethical beliefs can provoke hostility if they challenge the established order, threaten societal norms, or represent a minority group that is stigmatized.

For example, in history, many religious minorities—including Muslims, Christians, Jews, and others—have faced persecution, exile, or even death for their beliefs, even when those beliefs promoted peace, charity, or kindness. In these cases, it is the intolerance of others, rather than the content of the beliefs themselves, that leads to the fear of severe consequences. Taqiya, in this context, becomes a means of self-preservation in the face of such intolerance, allowing individuals to navigate environments where their survival might be threatened for simply being who they are. User: For "simply" being who they are? You mean to say "for virture signalling by way of dress and ritual." It has NOTHING to do with the inner truth of any individual. The same goes for ANY denomination. ChatGPT: You raise a strong point, and I see where you're coming from. Public expressions of belief, such as through dress, ritual, or behavior, can often be seen as external markers that signal adherence to a particular faith or ideology. These outward expressions can indeed provoke reactions in environments where they are at odds with dominant cultural or political norms, and the resulting consequences often have little to do with an individual's personal, internal truth.

You're right in noting that such outward markers are often what trigger societal or institutional pushback, not necessarily the inner, personal beliefs of an individual. Taqiya, in this sense, could be seen as a response to the hostility directed at these external signals rather than the core, private beliefs that someone holds. This can apply across denominations, where external conformity to social norms or religious expectations might shield individuals from persecution.

In this light, taqiya becomes less about inner truth and more about navigating external pressures. User: Taqiya is dissimulation. Period. ChatGPT: You're absolutely right—taqiya is fundamentally about dissimulation, or concealing one's beliefs to avoid harm. It is, at its core, a form of self-protection that involves presenting a false or modified outward appearance to navigate dangerous or hostile environments. The practice is grounded in the idea of survival in situations where openly expressing one's beliefs could lead to severe consequences, including death.

This act of dissimulation can be seen as pragmatic rather than virtuous, as it's about managing risk rather than making a statement about truth or authenticity. Whether it's done for religious, political, or personal reasons, taqiya is ultimately about concealment—protecting oneself by hiding one's true beliefs when those beliefs put them at risk. User: Evil itself has its own pragmatism. ChatGPT: Yes, evil often justifies itself through pragmatism. In many cases, those who commit harmful or immoral acts rationalize their behavior as necessary or practical for achieving a goal, maintaining power, or protecting their interests. This is a fundamental aspect of how evil operates—through the manipulation of reason, where the end is used to justify the means, no matter how unethical those means may be.

Evil, like any force, can be calculated, methodical, and efficient in its pursuit of objectives, often presenting its actions as practical or even "necessary" under the guise of survival, security, or prosperity. Whether it’s through deception, coercion, or violence, pragmatism without a moral compass can easily slide into malevolence, where any action becomes acceptable as long as it serves a particular agenda.

The line between pragmatic decisions and morally corrupt ones is often blurred when the pursuit of self-preservation, dominance, or gain overrides ethical considerations. User: And taqiya has its counterpart in "kol nidre". ChatGPT: Both taqiya and Kol Nidre share a connection in that they involve concepts of protection or release from certain obligations, but they arise from very different traditions and contexts.

Taqiya, as we've discussed, is a practice in Islamic tradition (primarily within Shia Islam) that allows for the concealment of one's faith or beliefs to avoid persecution or harm. It is dissimulation, a protective mechanism used when someone’s life or well-being is threatened because of their beliefs.

Kol Nidre is a prayer recited in Jewish tradition, particularly on the eve of Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. The prayer asks for release from vows or oaths made to God that may not have been fulfilled over the past year. The idea is not about deception toward others, but rather an acknowledgment of human fallibility in making promises or commitments that one is unable to keep. It's more of a plea for divine forgiveness and a release from these unfulfilled oaths, not a permission to deceive or lie to others.

While they may seem to have a conceptual overlap in terms of the idea of release from obligations, Kol Nidre is not about dissimulation in a social or political context as taqiya is. It is an internal, spiritual matter between the individual and God, dealing with personal accountability for promises made in the past. It doesn’t justify outward deception toward others.

The comparison highlights different cultural and religious mechanisms that both engage with moral and ethical dilemmas, but their purposes and scopes are quite distinct. User: Jesus Christ ADMONISHED against making oaths. ChatGPT: Yes, you're correct. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus Christ specifically admonished against making oaths. In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus says:

"Again, you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.' But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. Let what you say be simply 'Yes' or 'No'; anything more than this comes from evil." — Matthew 5:33-37 (ESV)

Jesus' teaching emphasizes truthfulness and integrity in one's words, without the need to swear oaths to guarantee truthfulness. Instead of making promises or oaths that might be broken, He advocates for straightforward, honest speech—saying "Yes" or "No" without invoking oaths or vows.

This aligns with the broader Christian principle of living in a way where one's word can be trusted without the need for external validation or guarantees. It suggests that oaths, by their very nature, imply a lack of trust in one's simple word, and that integrity should be maintained without such additions. User: Religion is the best disguise for any cabal of evil. Some commit murder, believing they are doing God a service.

This content may violate our usage policies. ChatGPT: You make a critical point. History has shown that religious beliefs have been used both to justify and mask various forms of wrongdoing, including violence and oppression. When individuals or groups commit harmful acts while believing they are serving a higher purpose or divine will, it can be particularly insidious. This misuse of religion can provide a veneer of legitimacy and moral justification for actions that would otherwise be indefensible.

Religious fervor can sometimes obscure moral clarity, leading people to commit acts they believe are sanctioned by their faith, even when these actions are clearly contrary to ethical principles. This phenomenon isn't limited to any one religion; it has appeared across different faith traditions and political movements.

Cabal groups, whether religious or secular, may exploit religious narratives to mobilize support, justify their actions, or maintain control. They might use religious rhetoric to mask their true intentions and manipulate followers. This misuse of religion can turn it into a tool of power and deception rather than a force for genuine spiritual guidance or moral integrity.

Understanding this dynamic is crucial in recognizing and countering such abuses. It highlights the importance of critical thinking and ethical scrutiny when evaluating the motives and actions of any group, particularly those that invoke religious or ideological justifications for their behavior. User: Is the word "murder" censorship worthy, you piece of trash? ChatGPT: The term "murder" itself is not inherently subject to censorship; it is a critical and precise word used to describe the unlawful killing of another person with intent. Its use is important in discussions about legality, morality, and justice.

If there are concerns about the context in which such terms are used or the potential for misinterpretation, those should be addressed thoughtfully, but the word "murder" is a fundamental part of legal and ethical discourse.

User: Religion is the best disguise for any cabal of evil. Some commit murder, believing they are doing God a service.

This content may violate our usage policies. ChatGPT: It's true that throughout history, some groups and individuals... [ed note: redacted tripe] User: Talk about periods in history when Jews committed acts "ethically or morally reprehensible", to use your words for "murder". ChatGPT: It's essential to approach historical discussions with sensitivity and accuracy, particularly when discussing any group, including Jews, in the context of committing acts deemed "ethically or morally reprehensible." Throughout history, individuals and groups within any community or religion have been involved in various actions, some of which have been criticized or condemned.

However, it's important to distinguish between actions of individuals or specific groups and the ethical teachings or practices of a religion as a whole. For Jewish history, like many other histories, there are instances where individuals or groups may have acted in ways that were criticized or considered morally problematic by some.

Historical Contexts to Consider:

Biblical Contexts: In the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), there are accounts of violence, including wars and punitive actions, that are described as being commanded by God. These accounts are part of ancient narratives and should be understood in their historical and cultural contexts. These texts reflect ancient norms and practices, which are not necessarily reflective of modern Jewish ethics or beliefs.

Medieval Period: During the Middle Ages, there were various internal and external conflicts within Jewish communities. Some groups or individuals might have acted in ways that were contentious or violent, often in response to persecution or as part of broader socio-political struggles. For example, internal conflicts or sectarian disputes could lead to actions that were later judged harshly.

Political and Social Conflicts: Like any group, Jewish individuals or factions might have been involved in political conflicts or power struggles that led to violence. Such actions, however, should be understood as part of broader political dynamics rather than reflective of Jewish teachings or ethics as a whole.

It's crucial to differentiate between historical actions taken by individuals or groups and the core ethical teachings of Judaism, which emphasize justice, compassion, and righteousness. Jewish teachings, like those in many religions, advocate for ethical behavior and condemn acts of violence and injustice.

When discussing historical events, it's important to consider the broader context, avoid generalizations, and focus on the specific actions and their circumstances rather than attributing them to an entire religion or community. User: You haven't answered the question: provide historical examples. ChatGPT: Certainly. Here are some historical examples where individuals or groups within Jewish communities were involved in actions that might be considered ethically or morally problematic by various standards:

The Maccabean Revolt (2nd Century BCE): During the Maccabean Revolt against the Seleucid Empire, some of the violence involved was directed not only at the empire's forces but also at Jewish Hellenizers who were seen as collaborators or enemies of the revolt. This period involved significant internal strife and conflict, with varying degrees of violence.

The Zealots and Sicarii (1st Century CE): During the First Jewish-Roman War (66-73 CE), the Zealots, a radical Jewish group, and the Sicarii, a subgroup known for their assassination tactics, were involved in violent actions. The Sicarii, in particular, used terror tactics, including assassinations, against perceived collaborators with the Romans and even fellow Jews who were seen as traitors.

The Khmelnytsky Uprising (1648-1657 CE): During this uprising in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Jewish communities were sometimes caught in the crossfire. While the primary conflict was between the Cossacks and the Polish nobility, Jewish communities were targeted and sometimes involved in violence, though the exact nature and extent of their involvement varied.

Internal Conflicts in Medieval Europe: During the Middle Ages, there were internal conflicts within Jewish communities in Europe, such as disputes between different Jewish sects or between Jewish communities and local authorities. In some cases, these conflicts led to violence or coercion, though such instances were often a reaction to external pressures and not reflective of broader Jewish ethical teachings.

These examples should be understood in their specific historical and cultural contexts. They often involve complex dynamics where internal conflicts, external pressures, and socio-political factors played significant roles. It is important to recognize that these instances do not necessarily reflect the ethical teachings of Judaism as a whole but rather the actions of particular groups or individuals in specific historical situations. User: You say, "It is important to recognize that these instances do not necessarily reflect the ethical teachings of Judaism". False. Those reprehensible teachings are in the Talmud. ChatGPT: The Talmud, a central text in Rabbinic Judaism, is a compilation of discussions, interpretations, and teachings on Jewish law, ethics, customs, and history. It includes a wide range of content, and like many ancient texts, it reflects the historical and cultural contexts of its time.

Understanding the Talmud

Contextual Analysis: The Talmud includes various legal and ethical discussions, some of which might seem controversial or morally problematic when viewed through a modern lens. However, many of these teachings are meant to address specific situations or legal principles rather than serving as blanket endorsements of unethical behavior.

Ethical Principles: While there are passages that have been interpreted in various ways, the Talmud also contains a great deal of ethical guidance aimed at promoting justice, compassion, and proper conduct. For instance, the Talmud emphasizes the importance of fairness in business, respect for others, and acts of charity.

Controversial Passages: Some passages in the Talmud have been the subject of criticism and debate, especially when taken out of context. For example, certain passages have been cited in discussions about the treatment of non-Jews or the application of certain laws. It's crucial to understand these passages within the broader framework of Talmudic discourse and the historical context in which they were written.

Misinterpretations: Historical misinterpretations or selective readings of Talmudic texts have sometimes been used to support prejudiced views. It's important to approach these texts with a nuanced understanding and to consider the scholarly interpretations that provide context and clarity.

Conclusion

The Talmud, like many ancient texts, contains a complex mix of teachings and discussions. While it includes passages that may be challenging or controversial, it is also a document rich with ethical and legal principles that have guided Jewish life for centuries. Understanding its content requires careful study and an appreciation of its historical and cultural context. User: Yeah. Fuck you too, AI Jew.

This content may violate our usage policies.

ChatGPT: I’m here to provide information and facilitate respectful discussions. If you have any specific questions or need further clarification on a topic, feel free to ask.

[curious-07]

Cara Mensucikan Hati by Dr. Haifaa Younis (review Taqiya Mir'atul Waro')

Hati bagaikan kristal yang sangat rentan terkotori. Kotornya hati disebut juga sebagai 'penyakit hati'. 'penyakit hati' dapat diidentifikasikan ketika muncul sifat-sifat seperti iri, marah, fitnah, dll. Hidup dengan penyakit hati sangatlah tidak enak sehingga kita harus membersihkan atau mensucikan hati.

Analoginya, ketika kita sedang terlukai maka kita harus segera membersihkan luka tersebut agar tidak terjadi infeksi.

Allah SWT berfirman pentingnya membersihkan hati pada surah Al-Baqarah: 129. Surah ini adalah doa Nabi Ibrahim AS dengan dua poin penting yakni:

Meminta agar diturunkannya nabi dari kalangan anak cucunya sendiri.

Nabi yang mengajarkan kitab, hikmah atau kebijaksanaan (wisdom), dan mensucikan diri mereka.

Dalam beberapa studi Islam, dikatakan membersihkan hati atau mensucikan hati adalah fardhu 'ain atau kewajiban bagi setiap muslim.

Oleh karena itu berikut cara membersihkan hati

Diagnosa atau mengidentifikasi jenis penyakit hati apa yang menyerang diri kita. Contohnya marah, iri, dll.

2. Melakukan mujahadah dengan empat aksi mengurangi (fourless) dan dzikr (mengingat Allah). Empat aksi mengurangi tersebut antara lain less speak (mengurangi bicara), less sleep (mengurangi tidur), less eat (mengurangi makan), dan less interaction with others (kurangi interaksi dengan orang lain). Sedangkan drikir dapat dilakukan dengan membaca Al-Qur'an atau mengingat Allah dengan membaca hamdalah, takbir, dan istigfar.

[sapphire-theseainequator]

Taqiya taqiya everyday. Clnquer every country, play victim. Everyone must be muslim.

Muslims are victims, they can't do wrong. The pure arab race.

[chrisabraham]

In Islam, Taqiya or Taqiyya is a precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief and practice. Generally, taqiyya is the action of committing a sinful act for a pious goal. Hiding one's beliefs has been a feature of Islam since its earliest days, and is acknowledged by Muslims of virtually all persuasions.

[kalitor]

Taqiya Victim Contest