#table talk

[corrupteddoodles]

“You’re supposed to be dead…”

“Who says I’m not?”

[punkitt-is-here]

Just wanted to say that I finally cracked open Astral Guard and this one Astra face took me out

HELL YEAH I'm so glad!!! Astra's faces were my FAVORITE to do bc she can just be so absurdly silly. I was consistently laughing at myself while drawing her face sprites. JJ's writing provided me with so many opportunities to go wacky with her.

[hemochromevtm]

Now that elders can turn thinbloods full vampires (temporarily) I wonder how my ST will treat Beetlejuice's blood bond.

Technically, Maria is an elder by the book's standards. If we were playing with rules as written, poor BJ would be a full-blooded toreador at the moment.

I'll have to ask them next time we hang, because I'd rather not have Beej going full vamp... yet

But the possibility is intriguing 🤔

[dungeonsandkobolds]

Hope you’re having a good day… any advice on what to include on a coming back from hiatus survey/questionairre and or second session zero?

Ooooh this is a fantastic idea of something to do!!!

Some things I might include:

Checking whether the balance of rp to combat to puzzles is correct

How is combat feeling? Is it balanced? Do they want it to be trickier? Do they want more easy fights that make their characters feel powerful between the hard stuff?

How they feel party dynamics are going (depending on the vibes at your table you could also make this confidential)

What things are going well? What have they enjoyed most so far?

Are they feeling happy with the genre/vibes of the campaign?

Are they feeling happy with their character?

These are just kind of off the top of my head, and will v much depend on the dynamics of your table. But make sure you give them a chance to compliment you/the stuff you do well! Particularly if you're coming back from a hiatus this will hopefully give you an extra boost of motivation to get back into the swing of things!

[xr250r]

Table Talk

[highground501]

Don't forget the 200k table made from the wood of a now extinct tree

[franchiseavs]

Table Talk Food Mall Franchise: Redefining Dining in India

Tap into the booming food and beverage industry with Table Talk Food Mall Franchise, a revolutionary concept delivering culinary excellence with minimal investment and high revenue potential. 

Why Choose a Table Talk Franchise?  

1. Proven Expertise:   Backed by a team with 45+ years of combined experience, Table Talk Food Mall leverages industry insights to craft a profitable franchise model. 

Franchisees benefit from this expertise through comprehensive support and innovative strategies.

2. Unique “One Kitchen, Multiple Brands” Model:   Operate multiple food brands like Boburger, Boba Blast, Beeji De Meals, Mumbai Meri Jaan, and more from a single kitchen. 

This approach optimizes resources, reduces costs by 25%, and ensures 3x growth compared to traditional models.

3. Diverse Menu Offering:  

With a menu ranging from burgers and Punjabi meals to fruit waffles and South Indian delights, Table Talk Food Mall attracts a wide customer base, driving consistent footfall and high customer satisfaction.  

Key Benefits 

- Lower Investment, Higher Returns: Achieve ROI in just 12-15 months.  

- Economies of Scale: Shared seating and utilities reduce operational costs.  

- Strategic Locations: Prime placement ensures strong visibility and customer traffic.  

- Comprehensive Support: Get assistance in operations, marketing, training, supply chain, and more.

 Why Partner with Table Talk?

1. High Revenue Potential: Optimized operations and a wide menu maximize sales.

2. Proven Business Model: Replicate a successful, time-tested model in your location.

3. Flexible Franchise Format: Suitable for spaces ranging from 200-1,000 sq. ft.

4. Digitized Operations: Streamlined processes reduce wastage and ensure smooth functioning.

Business Advantages

- Shared Infrastructure: Save costs while maintaining premium service quality.

- Centralized Support: From marketing strategies to inventory management, Table Talk provides end-to-end assistance.

- Customer Loyalty: High-quality offerings across cuisines ensure repeat business.

Culinary Diversity

Table Talk Food Mall brings together multiple brands under one roof, offering a variety of dishes that cater to everyone’s tastes:

- Boburger: Burgers, sandwiches, wraps, shakes.

- Boba Blast: Cold coffee, fruit shakes, mocktails.

- Mumbai Meri Jaan: Pav Bhaji, Vada Pav, Dabeli.

- The Overloaded Waffle Brand: Fruit-based waffles.

- Beeji De Meals: Authentic Punjabi cuisine.

- Vandanam: Dosas, idlis, and more.

Why Now?

With an affordable investment and an efficient business model, Table Talk Food Mall. 

Franchise offers aspiring entrepreneurs an incredible opportunity to succeed in the thriving F&B industry. 

Its multi-cuisine appeal, high customer retention, and optimized operations make it a standout choice for anyone looking to build a profitable business.

Create Your Culinary Success!   Contact us today at +91 92054 34226 and join the Table Talk revolution!

[marypsue]

Keep seeing that post where OP starts like 'Thinking about...grieving the undead' and then adds on about like. Real life situations where people have not died but have left your life and you would have reason to grieve them.

All respect, that's an important concept, but that is not what I am thinking about when I read 'grieving the undead'.

[wordsofsicca]

eyes of the table

[mantis-lizbian]

also, since you're bringing up Ed Greenwood, i just wanna say that this quote of his...

"How underscored this was by TSR, and later Wizards, varied over time and was always soft-pedaled because DnD wasn’t a sex game. We generally don’t rub the reader’s nose in sex unless there’s a good in-story reason for it."

is an AGGRESSIVELY anti-queer statement to make in how it reduces queerness to being something that would only be relevant in a "sex game" not to mention the homophobic associations with "rubbing people's noses in it". (additionally, i'd say the quote implicitly agrees that D&D is, itself, not meaningfully queer.)

D&D is the Taylor Swift of TTRPGs by which I mean it's something with broad mainstream appeal and name recognition and also there are people out there who pretend it's gay

[corrupteddoodles]

“Whats the matter? You look like you’ve seen a ghost!”

[punkitt-is-here]

Finally got around to playing Astral Guard Table Talk. The cast of characters is really fun and has some great chemistry and I'm already intrigued by the copious amount of "I'm fine" (they were not fine)

LMAO TO THAT LAST PART you're literally so right

[rq-tblazer]

FUN NEWS. we might actually be cisintersex ?

[mantis-lizbian]

okay, y'know what? let's go into this same. ignoring all the rules in 5e that i think are dumb, an itemized list with explanations. obviously, my list won't necessarily be the same as everyone's, but it'll illustrate the problem with suggestion in a practical sense, not just as a structural critique from the standpoint of game design, which i know a lot of people don't actually care about.

bare in mind that these are going to be criticisms with regards to the kind of game D&D 5e is and wants to be, and are largely going to use other editions of D&D as points of comparison, rather than other TTRPGs as a whole, just because to do so i feel could easily approach "i want a game about a witch looking for lost pets in the Alps" type stuff. no sense in criticizing D&D for not being Monsterhearts or GURPS, after all.

classes are too simple. any given berserker barbarian is functionally indistinguishable from another. for some classes, even different archetypes don't offer enough variation from each other to feel meaningfully distinct. here's a challenge: take your party of four and make an entire 6th-level party using only one class in each of 3.x, 4e, and 5e. depending on the class you choose, you may have more or less difficulty, but in two of those, you generally can manage to make four characters who can all function in a party together without feeling like clones of each other, and perhaps even able to actually complement each other.

classes are too complicated. for the most part, AD&D, BECMI, OD&D and the like, classes only have a couple of fairly basic features, most of which are granted from 1st level. this means that if a character dies, you can roll up a brand new one and jump straight back into play that same session. not being able to do this makes everyone, even the GM, resistant to allowing a character to die, defanging one of the only meaningful consequences to losing combat inherent to the mechanics.

battle master fighters restrict everyone's options in combat. if you're playing a melee combatant, there's very little you can do apart from run up to your chosen enemy and smack them in the face with your weapon until they die. disarming, feinting, tripping... these were all things any character could do in 3e, as outlined by the rules, and these things were possible in AD&D and the like because they weren't explicitly spelled out in the mechanics. the GM is free to adjudicate how to handle these maneuvers as they see fit, but because they aren't explicitly granted to a specific kind of character, they aren't implicitly denied to everyone else.

ability scores do not matter outside of Dexterity and whichever one your class cares about, and specific circumstances dependent on which saves are being targeted. 4e did start this, but even it made a conscious effort to make every class care about at least two scores alongside Dexterity, outside of saves. in AD&D, every score determined a number of things independent of your class (with the exception of Intelligence and Wisdom, if you weren't a spellcaster). and 3e required you to spend character resources (feats, specifically) to do things like use Dexterity on melee attack rolls, and even then it couldn't be added to damage, so there was still value to Strength even if you fought exclusively using daggers. all of this results in making it so that if you're using point-buy to determine ability scores, there is no meaningful mechanical consequence you can count on having to contend with for dropping every score to 8 so you can pump the ones you care about up to their maximum (in fact, i suspect that 5e makes point-buy cap out at 15 specifically to prevent players from doing exactly this to pump their two important scores to 18). unless you're a barbarian, even Constitution isn't as important as it should be, given the ingrained hesitancy 5e's design creates towards letting characters die.

only a couple of feats are actually better than taking the ability score boost, until you hit that cap of 20. even fewer are ever going to be meaningfully applicable to the same character as another, meaning that altogether, depending on what you were able to boost your class's main ability score to, by level 12 or so... you're likely to feel like meaningful pickings are slim for what to do with your remaining ASIs. it also becomes clearly apparent that the reason feats are an optional replacement for an ASI isn't so much an attempt to simplify the game compared to 3.x's notorious endless ocean of feats to wade through, and more about just having something to do with those ASIs after reaching 20 in your main score.

due to free Dex-to-damage, the only reliable consequence of a low Strength score left is encumbrance. which is often the first rule players choose to ignore, and even if they don't... an 8 Strength is still enough to wear full plate, and carry a pike and heavy crossbow and still having plenty of carrying capacity for a decent amount of random loot. so yeah... this is a rule that even if you aren't ignoring it, the rules are doing plenty to avoid it ever coming up anyway.

skills offer a great way to flesh out who your character is outside of "someone who rages" or "someone who chucks fireballs". unfortunately, your class still fully defines these things, outside of the two you get from your background, or if you choose to spend one of your feats/ASIs on gaining another three. at which point, you're probably going to have proficiency in more than half of all the available skills.

several excellent designers have gone into a number of other issues with D&D 5e's skills, from how overwhelmingly important ones like Perception are, how laughably irrelevant others are, and the issues in figuring out how to make good use of the knowledge and Investigation skills.

resting is... so... a lot of classes have nothing to do with a short rest. one time, i was playing as a warlock in a group that only ever took long rests because no one else got anything from just taking a short rest. which meant that the warlock essentially only had 2 spells per day. granted, this didn't mean nearly as much as it should thanks to cantrips, but i'll get to that later. so yeah, short rests were introduced in 4e where every class got equal value from them, and so they were more reliably used.

crafting is pointless. the example it gives of making a suit of plate armor taking 300 days means that it would take an entire year to make something that you're likely to find or at least afford with easily a month of adventuring. there's also no accounting for how good a craftsman you are. in 3e, that same suit of plate armor will take (assuming no failed checks along the way, to be fair) at most a month and a half. even assuming you fail half the checks, that's still only a quarter the time it takes to make that armor in 5e. this is still a decent time investment, but especially when you consider how having a higher Craft skill bonus (or even just a good roll) means you may be able to shorten that time, it brings it into the realm of "okay, that could be worth it, if i really wanted to".

bonus actions are only usable by a handful of classes, and may as well not exist for the rest, outside a couple of feats. with only one other action, alongside moving, that makes the kind of tactical combat built on the same principles of 3.x and 4e drag and feel incredibly monotonous (especially when, see #3). 3.x and 4e have alternative things you can do with your move action, which - especially alongside full-round actions - just as a way to open up design space means that there are a lot of ways to expand your options in combat. while AD&D also only features an action and movement - and doesn't even have a bonus action - combat is much smoother due to the overall simplicity of the game, and the fact that rounds represent a whole minute, not just 6 seconds.

cantrips are broken. they're usable at-will all day, which is fine. definitely an improvement i like over 3.x, and it gives your spellcasters something spellcastery they can reliably do any time. that's cool. but when they deal as much damage as a crossbow, and are based on your spellcasting score, it adds to the aforementioned thing about how most classes don't need to worry about more than one or two ability scores. why bother carrying around a crossbow when your fingers can shoot infinite crossbow bolts, possibly even targeting something other than AC and not dealing physical damage?

...oh wow. there's a character limit in posts...

im confused about the dnd 5e hatred. yall arent just ignoring rules that are dumb? ur dm actually follows every single thing in the book for real?

if you have to ignore some of the rules for the game to be good then the game is not good

[shitslikethis]

bar topics are only dead if you let them die……. if the table is silent and i pipe up to ask you a batshit “would you rather…?” i expect you to engage as if it is serious because if you laugh it off….. we’re back to dead silence…… that’s on you now

[academyoftheheartandmind]

Table Talk

By Ed Walsh It was after his wife was killed that my father’s brother visited us. I was thirteen at the time and from what I understood she was driving their car when she came off a straight stretch of road out in the sticks and hit a telegraph pole. There was nobody else in the car and no witnesses, no explanation for what happened beyond her just losing control of the thing. As an incidental,…