#suprme court

[daeron-targs]

I finished up my course paper and essay! I can finally write fanfic again!

[wenikhilkumar]

suprme court clarifies the limited scope of NCLT once the default is established

Supreme Court Clarifies the Limited Scope of Discretion Under Section 7 of the I&B Code. In a significant ruling in May 2023, the Supreme Court of India reiterated that the discretion of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Section 7 of the I&B Code is exceedingly narrow once the occurrence of default is established. This decision came in the case of **M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank & Ors**.

Background of the Case The facts of this case are rooted in the financial arrangements between Syndicate Bank (now merged into Canara Bank) and M/s. Kranthi Edifice Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). Syndicate Bank had provided a secured overdraft facility and several bank guarantees to the Corporate Debtor, some of which were in favor of the State of Telangana. When the State requested the extension of these guarantees, the Corporate Debtor, fearing the invocation of these guarantees, also sought their extension. However, Syndicate Bank declined the extension request and demanded repayment of the outstanding amount. Although the Telangana High Court temporarily restrained the bank from invoking the guarantees, Syndicate Bank proceeded to file a petition under Section 7 of the I&B Code, which was admitted by the NCLT. This decision was subsequently upheld by the NCLAT, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court by M. Suresh Kumar Reddy, a suspended director of the Corporate Debtor.

Key Legal Issues The appellant relied heavily on the Supreme Court's decision in **Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Ltd.**, arguing that the NCLT possessed the discretion to reject or delay a Section 7 petition if justified by the circumstances. The crux of the appellant’s argument was that the NCLT should exercise this discretion given the specific context of the case.

[kb85lazy]

LIVE DETECTOR SUPRM COURT

FART LG HG VD BTR IN TEN YEARS SYSTEM CLEAN

HR NN LIVE DETCTR SUPR COURT

GAME CHG

NM GAM EN GT IST

GOOGLE AVR KRN BMD NN DTBS SURRECT

NIN KIN FRAUD ON ITS OWN RESIRRECT

[gyanujala]

Pawan Khera Case | PM मोदी के पिता का गलत नाम बताना साजिश? रद्द कर दें पवन खेड़ा की जमानत; असम पुलिस ने SC में दिया जवाब

Pic: ANI गुवाहाटी: असम पुलिस (Assam Police) ने सर्वाच्च न्यायालय (Suprme Court) से कांग्रेस प्रवक्ता पवन खेड़ा (Pawan Khera) की अंतरिम जमानत रद्द करने की मांग की है। पुलिस ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट में दाखिल जवाब में कहा है कि खेड़ा से हिरासत में पूछताछ ज़रूरी है। बता दें कि, इससे पहले 23 फरवरी को प्रधानमंत्री मोदी के खिलाफ खेड़ा की कथित टिप्पणी को लेकर उन्हें उस समय दिल्ली हवाईअड्डे पर गिरफ्तार किया गया…

[theechudar]

Suprme Court to hear petition against judge’s appointment to Madras high court | India News

NEW DELHI: In a rare instance, the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on Tuesday a PIL by advocates challenging the hours-old President’s decision to appoint L C Victoria Gowri as a judge of the Madras High Court on the recommendation of the SC collegium headed by CJI D Y Chandrachud.Senior advocate Raju Ramachandran mentioned the petition by three women advocates of the Madras HC — Anna…

[quickyblog]

राजस्थान स्पीकर की दलील को सुनने के लिए SC आज पायलट विधायक के रूप में रिबेल विधायकों को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए सुनवाई कर रहे हैं

राजस्थान स्पीकर की दलील को सुनने के लिए SC आज पायलट विधायक के रूप में रिबेल विधायकों को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए सुनवाई कर रहे हैं

राजस्थान के विधानसभा अध्यक्ष सीपी जोशी ने बुधवार को सुप्रीम कोर्ट में हाई कोर्ट के 24 जुलाई तक रोक के आदेश के खिलाफ सुप्रीम कोर्ट का रुख किया, जिसमें बर्खास्त उप मुख्यमंत्री सचिन पायलट सहित 19 असंतुष्ट कांग्रेस विधायकों के खिलाफ अयोग्यता कार्यवाही करने से रोक दिया गया, जिसमें कहा गया कि “न्यायपालिका को कभी भी हस्तक्षेप करने की उम्मीद नहीं थी”। “संवैधानिक गतिरोध” के परिणामस्वरूप ऐसे मामले।

उच्च…

[realcleargoodtimes]

Go Nakamura/Getty Images Harris County's elections chief decided to close all but one drive-through polling site amid legal challenges from a group of Texas Republicans despite state and federal courts rejecting lawsuits seeking to toss out ballots cast at the locations. County Clerk Chris Hollins said he would shutter nine out of 10 drive-through polling sites in the county, which includes Houston, due to concerns over appellate challenges after a federal judge rejected a Republican bid to invalidate votes cast at the locations. Harris County, the most populous county in Texas with a population of nearly 5 million, still has more than 800 regular polling locations open to the public.

Harris County's elections chief decided to close all but one drive-through polling site amid legal challenges from a group of Texas Republicans despite state and federal courts rejecting lawsuits seeking to toss out ballots cast at the locations.

County Clerk Chris Hollins said he would shutter nine out of 10 drive-through polling sites in the county, which includes Houston, due to concerns over appellate challenges after a federal judge rejected a Republican bid to invalidate votes cast at the locations. Harris County, the most populous county in Texas with a population of nearly 5 million, still has more than 800 regular polling locations open to the public.

Hollins approved 10 drive-through polling sites for early and Election Day voting to provide more options amid the coronavirus pandemic after the state restricted mail-in voting and ballot drop boxes. But a group of Republicans sued to try to throw out about 127,000 early votes cast at the drive-through locations and ban their use on Election Day, arguing that they were an illegal expansion of curbside voting, which the legislature limited to voters with illnesses or disabilities.

The Texas Supreme Court rejected the lawsuit, and U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen likewise shot down the group's bid to invalidate votes which had already been cast.

Related Articles Texas Republicans try to get 127,000 early votes thrown out in heavily Democratic Harris County

[wenikhilkumar]

Suprme court affirms rights of secured creditors over pledged shares under IBC

Supreme Court Affirms Rights of Secured Creditors Over Pledged Shares Under I&B Code In a landmark decision in May 2023, the Supreme Court of India reiterated the entitlements of secured creditors within the framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code). The ruling in **M/S. Vistra ITCL (India) & Ors. v. Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr.** established that secured creditors are entitled to retain the sale proceeds from shares pledged by a corporate debtor. This decision further cements the protections afforded to secured creditors under the I&B Code, providing crucial clarity in insolvency proceedings.

Case Background The case involves Amtek Auto Limited, which approached M/S. Vistra ITCL (India) & Ors. (the appellants) for a short-term loan facility of Rs. 500 crores. This facility was extended to the corporate debtor’s group companies, including M/s. Brassco Engineers Ltd. (Brassco) and M/s. WLD Investments Pvt. Ltd. (WLD). As part of this arrangement, Amtek Auto Limited pledged its equity shares in M/s. JMT Auto Ltd. (JMT) to secure the loan. When insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the I&B Code were initiated against Amtek Auto Limited, a Resolution Professional was appointed, and the approval of a Resolution Plan was sought. The appellants, as secured creditors, moved to claim their rights over the pledged shares. However, the Resolution Professional rejected their claim, and this decision was upheld by the Adjudicating Authority and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellants, aggrieved by these decisions, escalated the matter to the Supreme Court.

[yanderemontgomerygator]

headncnamon/fnaficton: motngoemenuruy gator ia yanfere for galmrock fredy but montgomery gatr is upset about the suprem court votig to dismantl roe v wade an glamroc fredy has no dialog becus this isnt actusly yander montgoemry gatoe fanficon i am jus makig a statment becus i am mad.

start

montgoemenry gator: the suprme court neds term limits an the jstices shjould be voted in bye americn peeple in the sme way that we vot in presidnts and other vital ofices. the fact tha one of the mst imporant government ofices doesnt reqire an election from the citizns of its country is ridiclous nd frankly dangerous. and thre iss no realistic reson that any suprem cort justice should have teir job for life, especial when the majrity of the court curently represnats a minority of ctizins. cort packig is a temprary solution, but the only way it cn stand as a lng term solution is to ad terms / term limts and elctions to the suprem court, so tht americns can vot in suprem cout justics that actualy represnt our views. but anywas. fuck the suprm cort. fuk al republicans who cant se past ther own opinons on aborton for the sak of givig othrs a choic. an fuk the house democrts if they dont do someting about this IMMEDIATLY.

moryngoemry gator: overturnig roe v wade iz an atack on women an anyon els who can get pregnart, but it is als an atack on many othr comunitys. this i an atack on peppe living in poverty. thi is an atackk on pepole who ned birth control. ths is an atak on already ubderfunded adoption homs. an so many mor comunities. house democrats, ples dont continu to fail your party. fucking do someting for onc.

also elect bernie as presidant.

end.

/srs

[senatortedcruz]

A kid goes to visit Santa and say what he wants for Christmas

“I want a unicorn!” The child says

“Ho Ho Ho, that one might be a little hard for old Santa, is there anything else you would like?” Santa replies

“ I want republicans in the senate to stick to their principles and not vote to confirm a new Suprme Court justice until after the election” the kid says with childlike wonder

“What color do you want your unicorn?”

[newsoreo]

SC to Hear Rajasthan Speaker's Plea Today as Pilot Moves HC to Ensure Rebel MLAs Are Heard Too

SC to Hear Rajasthan Speaker’s Plea Today as Pilot Moves HC to Ensure Rebel MLAs Are Heard Too

[ad_1]

Rajasthan Assembly Speaker CP Joshi on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court against the high court order restraining him till July 24 from conducting disqualification proceedings against 19 dissident Congress MLAs, including sacked deputy chief minister Sachin Pilot, saying the “judiciary was never expected” to intervene in such matters resulting in “constitutional impasse”.

Seeking an…

[amitbchoudhury]

SC to Hear Rajasthan Speaker's Plea Today as Pilot Moves HC to Ensure Rebel MLAs Are Heard Too

SC to Hear Rajasthan Speaker’s Plea Today as Pilot Moves HC to Ensure Rebel MLAs Are Heard Too

[ad_1]

Rajasthan Assembly Speaker CP Joshi on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court against the high court order restraining him till July 24 from conducting disqualification proceedings against 19 dissident Congress MLAs, including sacked deputy chief minister Sachin Pilot, saying the “judiciary was never expected” to intervene in such matters resulting in “constitutional impasse”.

Seeking an…

[kamalahmadbrh]

हिंदू पक्ष की दलील थी- कब्जे के लिए राम जन्मस्थान पर नमाज पढ़ी; सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने माना- ढांचे के नीचे मंदिर था

हिंदू पक्ष की दलील थी- कब्जे के लिए राम जन्मस्थान पर नमाज पढ़ी; सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने माना- ढांचे के नीचे मंदिर था

[ad_1]

नई दिल्ली.सुप्रीम कोर्ट की 5 जजों की संविधान पीठ ने अयोध्या मामले पर शनिवार को फैसला सुनाया। कोर्ट ने 2.77 एकड़ विवादित जमीन रामलला विराजमान को देने का आदेश दिया है। ये भी कहा कि मुस्लिम पक्ष (सुन्नी वक्फ बोर्ड) को मस्जिद निर्माण के लिए अयोध्या में ही 5 एकड़ वैकल्पिक जमीन दी जाए। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 40 दिन तक लगातार चली सुनवाई में हिंदू और मुस्लिम पक्षकार ने अपनी दलीलें रखी थीं।

1) विवादित…

[localkhabarlive-blog]

सबरीमाला मंदिर में महिलाओं के एंट्री का फैसला, नाखुश पुजारी

सबरीमाला मंदिर में महिलाओं के एंट्री का फैसला, नाखुश पुजारी

New Delhi:केरल के सबरीमाला मंदिर में 10-50 साल की उम्र की महिलाओं के प्रवेश पर रोक को चुनौती देने वाली याचिकाओं पर  आज सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने ऐतिहासिक फैसला सुनाया है. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने मंदिर के अंदर सभी महिलाओं को इजाजत दे दी है. यानी अब हर उम्र की महिला सबरीमाला मंदिर में प्रवेश कर सकेगी.  मुख्य न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ति दीपक मिश्रा की अगुवाई वाली पांच सदस्यीय संविधान पीठ ने आठ दिनों तक सुनवाई करने के…