#submit to the mountains

[voyeuristiclens]

The romanticization of wondering into the mountains never to be seen again

[incognitopolls]

We ask your questions so you don’t have to! Submit your questions to have them posted anonymously as polls.

[thefirstvessel]

I think one of the things that a lot of humans fail into internalize about the Predator/Prey dynamic, especially in nature, is that millions of years of being shaped into Prey can often make incredibly territorial and fierce animals that will do anything they can to fight against millions of years of fighting being killed.

That's why horses kick and buck. Why rabbits are so infamously cantankerous and moody. Why deer have giant multi-pronged bone growths coming out of their foreheads that they can use for self-defense. Why rhinos are so dangerously territorial.

Meanwhile- a lot of Predators out in nature when they are not actually hunting (or play hunting) are remarkably chill. Especially macropredators. Think about how cats are known for the fact that they just lay around in the sun all day. Dogs are goofy guys who just want a friend.

The Predator/Prey dynamic isn't about the strong ferocious Predator taking advantage of weak and innocent Prey. When you're Prey, you're something that has spent millions of years being shaped into learning how to fight back. You're something that nature itself has pulled apart and put back together with all the sharp bits pointing out, just so you can survive.

You two have to be equal, otherwise there'd be nothing left to hunt.

[blueskittlesart]

what do you think about zora design? about past and current designs? how would you change it? actually!!! what are the zora (and other races) like in your sword of fate au???

got distracted by the second question. look at my little guys:

these are some of the current (working) designs!! from left to right it's sheikah, zora, hylian, goron, and gerudo! these aren't necessarily the average builds/designs for each race but they're the most important character from each race lol. sword of fate takes place really early-on in the timeline, so the culture and separation of races is still kind of loose especially among the humanoid races. the current generation of zora is basically the first generation to call themselves zora and attempt to establish a government or hold any authority alongside the other races of hyrule, and because they're kind of a young race i imagine they're less fishy and more invertebrate-like in this stage, hence my jellyfish princess! (her dad is a giant squid lol.) the sheikah are descendants of the original surface humans, whereas the hylians and gerudo are two seperate sects that both originally came from skyloft. the hylians built a few villages which each have their own distinct vibe while the gerudo took a more nomadic approach and roam the desert in small independently governed groups. The gorons are the most well-established race at this point, having been on the surface a lot longer than basically everyone else, and so they have a much stronger culture and shared identity than a lot of the other races that are still kind of getting their footing.

[trainerethan]

I choose to believe oak is very wealthy because I want green to get some financial support even if he gets no emotional support from him as a kid. And also because red having no job means someone has to provide financially. And red being greens unemployed outdoor boyfriend is very funny to me. Outdoor boyfriend like the inverse of the stay at home girlfriend trend that went around. Boyfriend whos never home but also has no job. Like a cat who only comes home for food.

[randomnameless]

The quintessential problem with Claude and the deer is that they should not have been involved in the war at all, or at least not Claude. What does he have to gain participating on it? Nothing, and he makes it even more explicit in azure moon when he dissolves the alliance. He could've pretty easely given the power to Lorenz or Hilda and nope out of there (what he does in silver snow), as it is clear througouht white clouds that he doesn't have as much of an attachtment to Fodlan as he does Almyra. And it isn't like the devs couldn't take the deer studients out during post-TS, when Marianne unless recruited is pressumed dead, and Lorenz unless recruited joins the imperial forces and dies helping the empire.

Outside of the problems with racism and the bigoted tropes related to "savage cultures" the Fodlan games perpetuate, the devs did not know how to use one of their house leaders for the main plot of "church vs empire", and idk if that's because they bit more than they could chew, or if it was intentional taking into account who gets the short end of the stick in both games happens to be mixed and from one of those "savage cultures".

TBH...

It's on the devs for having wanted to add a third lord to their game, but failing to, well, link him to any of those plots.

Supreme Leader's war of unification?

Well, Nopes gave him a part this plot - and yet there's no third choice in this plot : you bend the knee or you die. Nopes' wise, Clout decided (in his route) to bend the knee with his "alliance" that is totally supposed to make Supreme Leader reconsider her desire to roll over Leicester and make it part of Adrestia again!

(Granted, Nopes don't tell us how his plea to stop the war after killing the evil lizard lady will play out and leaves an open ending...)

In Houses, well, he doesn't want Leicester to be flattened, and goes on the offensive (counter offensive?) when Billy pops up with basically what is the plot events of Silver Snow (down to using the same strategy with disguises) with the Gronder Map.

And that addition radically changes... well, everything regarding Claude's relevance : he cannot form an alliance with the Blue Lord or the Kingdom to get rid of the Empire because "plot convenient myopia" and apparently Dimitri BaD enough that he attacks Alliance troops for no reason.

Forget SS, GW (and AM, in a way) is just using plot contrived excuse to... not have an united from to face the Empire. Why? IDK. Each Lord must be the hero of his story, or the unification boner means only one of them can "win" an unified Fodlan i'd guess.

Nabateans and the plot ?

No one gives a fig about that "plot", so it's basically pursuing a side-quest for no payoff.

Now, as @fantasyinvader wrote, Claude's story and journey as one who is ignorant and gets to learn and clear his misconceptions + the background of the land we're living in could have been interesting, doubly so given how Billy is voiceless and cannot play the "protag discovers the world at the same time as the player does" role.

But it has... no payoff.

Much like Rhea's infodump about the World, Relics and Nabateans... Claude reacts to the mention that Billy has a rock for heart, and not about his crest, his shiny bow or the fact that Rhea also had a vested interest in, uh, getting rid of prejudice against people who are perceived as "different" because her family was genocided for that.

Hell, the entire "prejudice" angle from Supreme Leader's war is swept under the rug, so we can have the Deers say nonsense like wanting to rekt Thales for Supreme Leader's sake, while only Flayn and Seteth can hear her "nabateans shouldn't have power over the people"...

There's no parallel drawn in the game about Claude and Rhea's situation - since she's at the center of this subplot - about being perceived as "outsiders" and not being able to do various things from existing to "rule over the people" because of what they are, or even faking their identities and building metaphorical walls between them and the people they're living with because they are afraid of rejection.

Nah, we can't have that, Rhea must be irrelevant to the possible, while also being the biggest scapegoat/dragon of this saga at the same time as a nebulous red herring to sell pots of tea.

Ihthe "fight against prejudice and make people accept each other" angle was that relevant to his route, Claude would have most likely talked or interacted with Dimitri and learnt of his plan to cleanse Duscur's name in his Father's assassination, raised a brow at Petra being a hostage and done something else than give a surprised pikachu face at Rhea's infodumps.

He could have reacted at her reveal that if you might want to live in peace with some people, if those people don't want that and label you as nothing more than fodder or things to be looted, it's not going to work.

And of course, gave a reaction at your second in command (unofficially?)'s reveal that, uh, her house keeps identured Almyran children as war prisoners?

Some people already made some AUs or "what ifs" routes for a proper Claude route and not the nonsense that we got in FE16 where it's basically "I react to the same plot events that happen in the other routes but top it all with a zombie".

The Deers could have been "better introduced" in a plot about getting rid of prejudice, or learning the causes of this prejudice : Marianne was/is hunted because of her blood ties to Maurice - not because what she did, but because what Momo did back then! - Lysithea was treated as a guinea pig and her house rolled over by Adrestia who has a less than rosy views about the "offshoots" that are called Leicester and Faerghus, Lorenz could explain that prejudice, just like piety, are tools used by people whenever they're relevant, like, some people being pissed at foreigners and some who aren't because they make money through international trading like Margrave Edmund does, Hilda justifying her House's animosity towards Almyrans because they lost many people in those pointless skirmishes (maybe a closed ones? Her mom or Uncle or whatever?) which would make Claude realise that "ending prejudice" is a much more difficult quest than, idk, just killing one or two randoms.

The commoner trio might share Claude's views about prejudice and welcoming foreigners, but have more "mundane" worries like being able to have a roof and food to eat, which might be the case of some people in Leicester, or tell us more about Leicester and how it works (give us more insight about the different countries if Fodlan ffs).

Maybe we could have add a Claude who learns and discovers Fodlan, and along the way, starts to love the land as much, if not more, than Almyra and really wanting to protect this land from whatever Supreme Leader's cooking, or becoming an Almyra v.2.

I don't think making Claude the third wheel of the plot was maliciously intentional because of the, uh, implications with RL cultures and Almyra, but more like they didn't know where to put him.

I noticed you wrote the conflict as one that is "the church vs the empire", but I do not really agree - if that was the case, the war would have stopped in VW/AM/SS the second Rhea was caught.

The main conflict is Supreme Leader's war of conquest - with the twist that the devs were really banking on their brilliant idea of making the red emperor the titular waifu of the game that each person/lord/whatever Rhea is must find a way to excuse and/or justify her actions.

With this in mind, AM is basically Dimitri's fall (and rise!) because of his ties to Supreme Leader.

In VW? The game cannot explore too much outside of the Supreme Leader scope so we're left with.. well, what VW was.

Claude cannot go on a journey to discover Fodlan and get rid of his misconceptions... because part of those same misconceptions are used by Supreme Leader to start her war, or the sheer concept of a conquest, aka a nation being rolled over by another is anathema to his, supposed, ideal of wanting people to accept each other despite their differences.

I ranted about it since day 5, but the Nabatean subplot (and Fodlan in general) is accessory to Supreme Leader war, there is no point aka no payoff for learning all of that, because you cannot challenge the one who wants to unify the continent.

As such, Claude cannot deviate too far from this plot - while receiving infodumps about "the lore" - and we end up with third wheel of a bike and characters who, at first and second glance, appear to be irrelevant.

Fodlan ends up unified despite starting as three separate countries, we feel bad for Supreme Leader and mourn her unknown ideals, Rhea is gone and the Agarthans aren't a problem anymore.

the second the devs said leicester was a republic, claude was doomed. Merchant republics are always irrelevent or straight up useless in the FE series!

[radarchives]

[have-you-read-this-short-fiction]

[forerussake]

i just realized with that last prompt fill and all my bonus prompt fills i have technically filled my whole guardian bingo card. everything else i manage to finish after this is just bonus. huh. wow. i didn’t think i’d actually manage.

[every-sanji]

[haveyoubeentothiscity]

Population: 7,025

[pyr0cue]

That have you listened to this album poll blog is deeply hilarious to me. Does no one listen to music on this website why does no one know any album ever made

[haveyouseenthisromcom]

[seiwas]

my blog anniversary (when i first started fully writing) is coming up next month 🥺 and i just hit a major milestone too 🥺 thank you all for being here with me!! 🥺 am thinking of an event i can do hmmm

[could-they-be-a-pro-wrestler]

Mountain (Arknights)

Can Mountain perform a…

[script-a-world]

Submitted via Google Form:

Can I have a planet with super high mountains but a lack of core activity? The lack of activity is because I want it to be somewhat of a safe paradise that doesn't have many earthquakes or the like. Surely, it will take a much longer time, but how long is too long before things will naturally erode and destroy the mountain top before they can get high enough? How about when scientists actively try to slow the erosion? Sci fi tech is very possible. There is magic as well but I doubt it'll help with anything since it's only pure mental powers - people are psychic, telepathic, etc. Even telekinesis doesn't exist because that moves physical objects.)

Tex: An active core has several benefits for the planet that encapsulates it, such as the production of a magnetic field and planetary rotation. This does come at the consequence of plate tectonics and all it entails, such as earthquakes, but most places on a planet will rarely see an earthquake of note outside of fault lines where the plates meet.

Mountains are created by plates pushing up against each other - where one side of a plate will push up, the opposite side of the plate will be pulling away from its neighbor, and the other two side (roughly) will be sliding against their neighbor plates. All three of these are some sort of seismic activity, but will appear different based on the conjunction of plate movements and where these activities are observed.

Ergo, in order to have very steep mountains, two plates must be pushing up against each other with enough strength to accomplish this - a feat bolstered by strong core activity. To divorce one from the other repudiates basic physics, though I suppose you could always handwave in the Tolkien style and have a deity or sufficiently-advanced technology plop all the rock necessary to create a mountain directly on top of the land.

I will mention that a core with little or no activity will be a very cold environment due to the lack of precipitation cycle from its planetary rotation and weak or non-existent magnetic field, if these are not artificially-created.

Wootzel: This question arrived only days after I watched a somewhat relevant sci-show video, so you’re getting that first! Enjoy. 

If your goal is to have a really safe planet, having a still core and lack of tectonic activity might actually work against you. I’d much rather live on a planet with lots of quakes and a magnetic field, rather than no quakes but no field! Solar and cosmic radiation are very dangerous, and a magnetic field is the biggest source of protection from them. 

If you want your planet to be really safe, I’d suggest employing technology to avoid the dangers of quakes, but not the quakes themselves. If this planet was settled by sapient life and none evolved there, it would probably be easy enough to say that the settling people used a few probes and their knowledge of geology to determine where the tectonic plates are, and then avoided their edges. 

Mountains and quakes both tend to happen around the edges of plates, but if you want mountain life to be possible without all that movement, you could just decide that at least some of the mountains aren’t growing anymore. The North American Appalachian mountains have been pretty tectonically inert for millions of years, and while they’re not as jagged as the still-growing Rocky mountains, they’re undeniably mountains. If you want your world’s mountains to be crazy high by Earth standards, you might start pushing the limits of believability, but that’s okay. Perhaps, if this explanation even makes it into your story, you could say that the tectonic plates used to be more numerous, and recently (recently geologically, so probably millions of years prior), some of them fused and left big, inert, safe mountains behind that just haven’t had much time to erode. 

Perhaps you could throw some neat sci-fi tech around that makes quakes a non-issue, instead. Some kind of massive structure near settlements that acts as a sort of seismic lightning rod, perhaps, and diverts or dissipates the shocks? 

Also, check out the wikipedia article on earthquake-resistant structures. Even without sci-fi tech, there are some options available that could be employed to reduce the devastation in the case of a quake.