#southlake appeals lawyer

[barrowsfirm]

Finding a Compassionate Southlake Divorce Lawyer? Trust Barrows Firm to Guide You Through

💔 Dealing with a divorce in Southlake? You don't have to navigate this challenging process alone. Barrows Firm is here to provide you with the compassionate support and expert guidance you need. As your trusted Southlake divorce lawyer, we are committed to helping you through this difficult time. 💼👨‍⚖️⚖️

Our team of skilled Southlake divorce lawyers understands the intricacies of Texas family law and will work tirelessly to protect your rights and advocate for your best interests. We know that every divorce is unique, and we take the time to listen to your specific needs and goals.

🤝 At Barrows Firm, we believe in building a strong attorney-client relationship based on trust and open communication. We are dedicated to providing personalized representation tailored to your circumstances, whether it involves child custody matters, asset division, or spousal support.

💪 Our Southlake divorce lawyers are known for their professionalism and compassion. We understand that divorce is not just a legal process, but also an emotional journey. That's why we strive to create a supportive and understanding environment where you can feel comfortable sharing your concerns.

🌟 Ready to take the first step towards a brighter future? Contact Barrows Firm today to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced Southlake divorce lawyers. We are here to guide you through the complexities of divorce, providing you with the knowledge and support you need to make informed decisions.📞 You don't have to face divorce alone – Barrows Firm is here to help you navigate this challenging chapter in your life. Trust us to be your compassionate ally throughout the process. Let's work together towards a brighter tomorrow. 💙#SouthlakeDivorceLawyer #BarrowsFirm #CompassionateSupport #NavigatingDivorce #TexasFamilyLaw

[versustexasfortworth]

Varghese Summersett (Personal Injury, Criminal Defense, Family and Divorce Lawyers)

300 Throckmorton Street, Suite 700 Fort Worth TX 76102 United States 817-203-2220 https://www.versustexas.com/ info@versustexas.com

Varghese Summersett is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. We have three divisions: Personal Injury, Family Law, and Criminal Defense. The Personal Injury division handles everything from car accidents and trucking accidents to wrongful death and catastrophic injuries. The Criminal Division handles every level of criminal case from DWI to sexual assault and federal criminal cases. Finally, the Family division handles divorce, modifications, and custody disputes. The firm also has offices in Southlake and Dallas.

https://versustexas.com/personal-injury/

https://versustexas.com/criminal-defense/

https://versustexas.com/family-law/

Fort Worth DWI Lawyer

They are known for their ability to aggressively defend cases. Benson Varghese has been referred to as the nemesis to the local district attorney because his team goes in and wins time after time. They handle everything from misdemeanor DWIs to capital murder cases.

Varghese Summersett PLLC is a full-service criminal defense law firm located in Fort Worth, Texas that serves clients in Tarrant, Dallas, Johnson, Parker, Wise, and Denton Counties.

Practice areas include DWI and intoxication-related offenses, white collar crimes such as fraud and embezzlement, assault, drug charges, crimes against children, theft and burglary, robbery, homicide and manslaughter, sex crimes, and other felonies and misdemeanors. The firm also represents clients in expunctions and nondisclosures, probation violations, asset forfeiture, and appeals. The lawyers have decades of combined legal experience and have collectively tried hundreds of jury trials. The senior partners are former state and federal prosecutors, giving them valuable insight into the opposition’s tactics. Several of the attorneys are Board Certified Criminal Law Specialists. Among them, they are admitted to the bars of the State of Texas, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of Texas, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Varghese Summersett, PLLC brings together experience, knowledge, and skills to advocate on behalf of clients, even in the most complex criminal cases.

[omgstupendousbouquetbasement]

Texas Couple, Convicted of Enslaving Guinean Girl, Await Sentencing 

A U.S. federal court has convicted the son of a former Guinean president, along with his wife, for enslaving a young, undocumented girl from the West African country and forcing her to work unpaid in their north Texas home for 16 years. Mohamed Toure and Denise Cros-Toure, both 57, were convicted of forced labor, harboring an alien and conspiring to harbor an alien. The couple, who live in the Dallas suburb of Southlake, were acquitted of another charge, conspiracy to commit forced labor.  "The defendants preyed on a young and extremely vulnerable girl. Their despicable actions included cruelly abusing her, forcing her to work in their home, hidden in plain sight, for years without pay, and robbing her of her childhood," Eric Dreiband, assistant attorney in the U.S. Justice Department's civil rights division, said in a statement Friday announcing the verdict.  Sentencing has not yet been scheduled for Toure and Cros-Toure. They face up to 20 years in prison, according to the statement, which also said restitution was mandatory.  Toure and Cros-Toure were taken into custody by U.S. Marshals after the verdict was announced Thursday evening, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram newspaper. The couple had been on home arrest since shortly after their arrest last April.  Attorneys for Toure and Cros-Toure said they would appeal the convictions. "A family has been destroyed," said Toure's lawyer, Brady T. Wyatt III of Dallas, according to the Star-Telegram. "The government told a story and we contradicted it." Djena Diallo, the young woman at the center of the case, was present during the four-day trial but did not testify. Federal court documents indicate the victim came from a village in Guinea and was brought to the United States as a child, perhaps as young as 5. Her age is unclear. Toure and Cros-Tore "required her to cook, clean and take care of their [five] biological children," the court statement said, "… without pay for the next 16 years." Diallo also was seen painting the house, mowing the lawn and tending gardens, neighbors said. She was not permitted to attend school, and she was beaten with belts and electrical cords and choked, she told authorities.  Call for help The girl escaped in August 2016 with the aid of a former neighbor she'd telephoned for help. Bridget Abujo, the ex-neighbor and prosecution witness, testified that she had sent her daughter to pick up Diallo and bring her to safety, first at the Abujos' home and then a YWCA, The Dallas Morning News reported.  According to The News account, Abujo said in court that she had arranged for tutoring for Diallo. She also said Diallo's immigration status was in "limbo." VOA could not reach federal officials to confirm. Toure is the son of the late Ahmed Sekou Toure, the first president of Guinea after the country gained independence from France in 1958. He held office until suffering a fatal heart attack in 1984.  Consequences   Toure and Cros-Toure have been permanent U.S. residents since 2005, the Star-Telegram reported, citing court documents. It said that, according to Texas Workforce Commission records, Toure has never been employed in the United States but worked for a government party in Guinea. His wife worked for Delta Air Lines from 2005 to 2006 and as a substitute teacher starting in 2016. Jurors decided the Toures' property should be forfeited. The Dallas Morning News reported that would include the family's house, appraised last year at $584,000.  Scott H. Palmer, a defense attorney for Cros-Toure, told The News that a juror called him the day after the verdict to say that jurors were reluctant to convict the couple because Diallo had been free to leave the house and was active on social media. They probably would have acquitted the couple had they enrolled the girl in school, Palmer said the juror explained.  But Ann Johnson, a former Texas state prosecutor and expert in human trafficking, told The News that just because there were no signs of physical confinement didn't mean there wasn't mental or emotional bondage.  "And that's why a lot of people may not even see themselves as a trafficking victim," Johnson was quoted as saying. "A big part of it is the manipulation. ... These are very tough cases to make."  VOA's French to Africa Service contributed to this report. from Blogger http://bit.ly/2stZFKy via IFTTT

[dallasinterstatedruglawyer]

Best Defense Lawyer in Southlake TX: Four Signs You’ve Found Him

Finding the best defense lawyer in Southlake TX isn’t always easy, but it’s an essential step if your freedom and livelihood are on the line. Most attorneys have an air of professionalism about themselves, and if you put in the time to interview several, quite a few will look like decent choices. However, the best defense lawyer in Southlake TX will set himself apart from the rest in several areas. Don’t select average representation. Search for these signs that you’re meeting the ideal attorney for your situation.

# 1 Knowledge and Experience: The best defense lawyer in Southlake TX will be a specialist in the field of your specific charges. There are a myriad of legal specialties, and if you have been accused of a drug-related crime, your attorney must have experience handling drug cases that resemble yours. At Dallas Interstate Drug Lawyer, all the legal professionals presented fit your criteria.

# 2 Accessibility: The ideal candidate will be as dedicated to your case as you are. Although attorneys manage several cases at a time, the best defense lawyer in Southlake TX will always make time to listen to your concerns or will return your calls in a prompt manner. When your attorney makes every effort to remain in contact you, it’s a sign that he’s staying on top of your case and managing it properly.

# 3 Rapport: Part of an attorney’s job is to be able to connect with people from all walks of life. Should your case go to trial, his personal appeal will be critical in instilling positive feelings among the jurors, and also with the judge and prosecutors. If you feel a bond or connection with a particular attorney, it’s a sign that he has the qualities necessary to win over others who will be associated with your case, too.

# 4 Fees: Obviously, you’ll want to find an attorney who fits within your budget, but bear in mind that the fees charged aren’t always an accurate representation of the level of service you’ll receive. Moreover, billing isn’t standardized in the industry, so as you talk to potential candidates, determine how their billing system works. Get an overall estimate of the total charges and determine what is included in the amount. It’s also worth noting that some attorneys offer their initial consultations at no charge, and others will accept payments, so this can help make the best defense lawyer in Southlake TX a little more affordable.

As you look for the best defense lawyer in Southlake TX, take a look at a number of the experienced attorneys listed on Dallas Interstate Drug Lawyer. They’re experts in drug cases, and are all well-qualified, so they can provide the best representation possible. Be sure to speak to more than one, as that will make it easier to identify these signs in the right candidate. In order to provide your attorney with the time he needs to establish a solid defense strategy for your case, begin scheduling consultations immediately.

We have many highly qualified lawyers that would be happy to help you. Simply call one of the lawyers listed on the right, or scroll to the top of the page and click the big orange “click here” button to get started today.

The post Best Defense Lawyer in Southlake TX: Four Signs You’ve Found Him appeared first on Dallas Interstate Drug Lawyer.

from Best Defense Lawyer in Southlake TX: Four Signs You’ve Found Him

[benrleeusa]

[John K. Ross] Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions

Sacred pachyderms, boating while Latino, and police misconduct insurance.

Over at the Cato Institute's Daily Podcast, IJ Senior Attorney Robert McNamara explains why the Supreme Court's recent decision in NIFLA v. Becerra is one of the most important free speech rulings in a generation. Click here to listen.

Or click here to read McNamara and fellow IJ Senior Attorney Paul Sherman on NIFLA in Cato's Supreme Court Review.

Under decades-old Federal Election Commission regulations, nonprofits that run political ads need disclose the identities only of donors who earmarked their donations for those specific ads. Uh oh! A federal district court holds that this is a plain misreading of the law, which requires all contributors be disclosed. D.C. Circuit: And that is probably right, so we will not grant a stay pending appeal. (NB: Neither will the Supreme Court.)

Advocacy group for the blind sues the Container Store, alleging that the company's use of touch-screen point-of-sale devices—which are inaccessible to blind customers—violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. Not so fast, says the Container Store: You agreed to arbitrate disputes when you signed up for our loyalty program. First Circuit (with retired Justice Souter sitting by designation): They did no such thing, because the terms of the arbitration agreement were never communicated to them.

Third time's a charm (but so were the first and second): After twice persuading the Third Circuit to reinstate her complaint alleging that Pennsylvania prison officials suspended her visitation privileges in retaliation for her exercise of First Amendment rights, pro se plaintiff persuades the same court to vacate the entry of summary judgment in the prison officials' favor. But, adds the Third Circuit: Pleeeeeeease get a lawyer on remand.

Special ed teen pleads guilty to assaulting Brownsville, Tex. corrections officer. Four years into his eight-year prison sentence, video emerges that exonerates him; he's released. Fifth Circuit (en banc): But he can't sue the gov't for hiding exculpatory evidence because he pleaded guilty. The right to receive exculpatory evidence applies only to trials, not to plea-bargaining. By entering a guilty plea, the teen waived the right to a trial and, by extension, the right to receive exculpatory evidence. Judge Ho, concurring: And criminal defendants should be glad that Brady rights are waivable; it gives them the option to trade that right for something better, like less jail time. (Indeed, an unwaivable right is like receiving an elephant as a gift from the King of Siam: if you can't sell the elephant, return it, or trade it, then the pachyderms will "inevitably eat their owners out of house and home.") Judge Costa, dissenting: The trend among our sister courts is to recognize Brady rights pre-trial.

Fifth Circuit: Officers seeking to conduct a "knock and talk" need to back off if no one answers the door—either to conduct more surveillance, get a warrant, or call it a day. What they can't do is repeatedly bang on the door, call residents on the phone, and peek in windows at 2 a.m. So no qualified immunity for Southlake, Tex. officers who allegedly did that and also body-slammed an unresisting, practically blind mother onto brick steps. (Local news write-up of the incident here.)

Seeking to raise tax revenue, Upper Arlington, Ohio officials prohibit schools from operating in business district. Religious school challenges the restriction as a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Sixth Circuit: Plaintiff isn't similarly situated to any of the groups allowed to operate in the business district, so there is no violation. Dissent: RLUIPA does not contain a "similarly situated" requirement; you (and other courts) are just making that up.

Nashville city attorney states at oral argument that police forced picketers to leave a public sidewalk near the city's LGBTQ Pride Festival to create a "safe space." Sixth Circuit: But for the content of the picketers' speech, they wouldn't have been removed. That's content-based discrimination; strict scrutiny applies, and Nashville loses. Dissent: The picketers' use of bullhorns means Nashville's action wasn't content-based, and concessions by Nashville's "obviously harried" attorney at oral argument shouldn't count as evidence.

Tennessee state legislator engages in pattern of inappropriate sexual behavior (see the official report), is expelled from the Legislature, and loses his lifetime health insurance and some pension benefits. District court: He can't sue the state's benefits administrators who cut him off; it was the Legislature that voted to do it. Sixth Circuit: Reversed. He has standing.

Milwaukee County Jail has zero-tolerance policy forbidding corrections officers from having sexual contact with inmates, trains guards to avoid such contact and quizzes them to demonstrate they understand. Guard rapes inmate multiple times anyway; he's later fired, prosecuted, jailed for three days. Jury awards inmate $6.7 mil. Seventh Circuit: The county need not pay it.

After six and a half hours of questioning, mentally retarded man confesses that he, along with a cousin, murdered aunt and uncle in their Douglas County, Neb. home. Physical evidence fails to support confession, so crime-scene commander plants blood. Both men charged with murder; charges dismissed months later after Wisconsin teenagers plead guilty to the crime. Eighth Circuit (2012): The men can sue investigators for coercing the confession, fabricating evidence. Nebraska Supreme Court: The (now-former) commander's evidence-tampering conviction is affirmed. Eighth Circuit (2018): The county's insurance company doesn't have to pony up the $6.6 mil the commander has been ordered to pay the men, as his actions were criminal and the policy excludes such things. (Click here for some local longform journalism.)

Memorabilia collector and museum are all shook up over who owns a guitar that Elvis played on his final tour. Eighth Circuit to collector: Don't be cruel, it's the museum's.

Man sends out distress call after his boat engine dies. The Coast Guard tows him to Oxnard, Calif. harbor, where eight officers are waiting to detain him on suspicion of being an illegal alien, which it turns out he is. Ninth Circuit (August 2017): Boating while Latino does not give rise to probable cause; terminate the removal proceedings. But wait! The opinion is withdrawn in July 2018 after its author, Judge Pregerson, dies. Ninth Circuit (now with Judge Wardlaw): Actually, we'll let the immigration court figure out if removal proceedings should be terminated. Judge Paez/Pregerson concurring: It is troubling that the gov't encourages noncitizens to apply to relief programs and then uses that info against them in removal proceedings.

To fight climate change, Oregon imposes a system of carbon-credit trading for fuels. Plaintiffs: Which discriminates against out-of-state fuels and overrides an EPA rule. The Ninth Circuit (over a dissent): Not so. It's permissible environmental protection, and we've upheld a near-identical system in California. This one's fine too.

Kansas man absconds to Texas with underage girl to (in his words) "stack and lay low." He's caught, convicted of sex trafficking. Man: "Stack and lay low" is a rap lyric that alludes to "frugality, working every day, and living a full life with friends and family." Tenth Circuit: The jury could have reasonably inferred otherwise. (Later in the song, the rapper says, "[T]hey don't question what I say 'cause I'm a ladies['] pimp.") Conviction affirmed.

Family and friends of prison inmates seek class arbitration against company that allows them to transfer money to inmates, alleging exorbitant fees. But should the question of whether they can arbitrate as a class be decided by the court or by an arbitrator? Eleventh Circuit: The arbitration agreement makes clear that the parties consented to all questions being arbitrated, including the question of arbitrability.

After four years fighting in federal court, IJ this week settled a class action lawsuit against Philadelphia over its abusive civil forfeiture practices. The city has agreed to solid procedural reforms and will set up a $3 million compensation fund so that innocent owners, who were never convicted of a crime, will get every dollar back. For over a decade, Philadelphia turned civil forfeiture into a machine, taking more than 1,200 homes, 3,500 vehicles, and $50 million in cash from residents. Working from a "courtroom" at City Hall, prosecutors controlled a forfeiture process that involved no judge and in which defendants weren't entitled to an attorney, even though their most precious property was often on the line. The consent decrees the city has agreed to will keep future prosecutors from ever again using citizens as ATMs. Click here to read more.