#society why must you pit three bad bitches against each other...
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
fuck marry kill: golden kamuy, atla, radiant emperor
3 queens stand before me.
Marry alta, its the most wholesome. Media of all time. an incredibly respectable choice. one you would bring home to your parents.
fuck the radiant emperor series. zhu? extremely fuckable. baoxiang? extremely fuckable. ouyang? so unfuckable that he's looped back to being fuckable. Xu Da? canonical sex god. ma? pussy so good it will make you want to be a better person. esen-temur? BARKBARKBARKBARK this is THE esen thirst blog, need i even say it?
kill golden kamuy. out of the three, killing it would actually be the Horniest option. it would pop the king of all boners while i choke the life out of it if im being honest... everybody say "thank you, noda!"
#society why must you pit three bad bitches against each other...#i had a long debate about whether to kill or fuck gk. ultimately i realised that they are same thing.#what is murder but a joining of two people in extacy? you cannot kill what you do not desire yourself.#homicide more like homocide
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Buddy and Ummi: The Trust (Damian Wayne x Mother Figure!Reader)
Summary: As Dick Grayson’s girlfriend, you meet his new younger sibling, Damian Wayne. The young boy doesn’t know how to express that he needs a mother figure, but once you figure it out, you’re happy to be just that. This is the fourth part in the series. If you haven’t read the first three parts you can find them in the masterlist below.
Word Count: 1033
Series Masterlist
Lunch continued as normal until Jason burst into the dining room. He mumbled an apology about traffic and being held up by Roy and Kori. The more realistic answer, however, was that he slept in or forgot about lunch, or both. You smiled at him and watched as he took the seat on the opposite side of Dick, where Damian had sat the last time you were at the manor.
Alfred placed the plate of food you two had left aside in front of the boy who looked like he was still waking up, and the family returned to their meal, and the conversations they were having. Despite being across the table from each other, Bruce and Tim were discussing something to do with Wayne Enterprises, Dick was talking to Alfred about a new recipe he wanted to try, and Damian conversed with you about possible ways of making new friends, and how to weed out the fake people that only wanted him for his money.
As Jason gathered his bearings, he finally noticed the friendly spirit between you and his youngest sibling. You were telling him a story from your high school years, arms flailing around in an attempt to gesticulate the meanings behind your words. Damian sat there, entranced by your story. He had a small smile on his face which, unsurprisingly, caused Jason concern. He tapped his older brother on the shoulder and nodded to you two when Dick turned his head.
“How did she do that?”
“What?” Dick asked, an amused smile on his face.
“The demon spawn...He’s smiling?”
“A smile is a reaction often known in human society to portray a feeling of joy or happiness,” Dick stated teasingly.
“I know what a smile is, dumbass-” the boy responded before being cut off by Alfred, warning him to watch his language. He promptly apologized before continuing, “I just didn’t realize the demon was capable of any feelings, let alone joy.” Dick simply smirked at him as he continued. “She must be magic, Dick. Or a saint. How could anybody get THE big bad annoying piece of crap that is Damian Wayne to show emotion. Does she know Zatanna? Or Constantine? Should we be worried?”
“Is it really that difficult for you to believe that she’s just a genuinely good person?”
Jason raised an eyebrow at that, before sending another glance to the now laughing Damian. Damian looked over and caught Jason’s eye which led him to stop laughing and immediately stiffen up. He once again looked like he hated everyone in the room.
“See bud. This is exactly what I mean,” you pointed out to the young boy, gesturing with your fork. “If you keep acting like that around everyone, they’re going to think you hate them.”
“Well,” he began, a slight smirk on his face. It was almost undetectable, but once you heard what he said, you knew he was smirking. “I don’t think they’d be wrong. I do hate everyone… It’s my whole thing, (Y/L/N).”
You rolled your eyes at him, but smiled, which caused the two of you to break out into laughter again. This time, he didn't allow his brothers’ stares to prevent him from expressing his emotions.
“Okay, okay. I see what you mean,” Jason said, turning to your boyfriend. “She might just be a good person.”
“I knew you'd come around.”
“But she's too good. I still don't trust it.” He said this, and most would think he was joking, but Dick knew better. Ever since the whole Joker and Lazarus Pit thing he was scared to trust anyone. He put on a front that made him seem indifferent, but he was scared.
“You can't just not trust someone because they're “too much” of a good person, Jaybird. I know you've got that whole untrusting bad boy vibe going on or whatever it is you're trying to do, but she's not going to hurt us. Look at me and tell me you don't think Damian deserves someone in his life that can make him happy. Or make him feel like a child again. Give him the childhood he never had. If she can do that for him, why get upset? And if not for Damian, for me. She makes me the happiest I've ever been. Not only that, but if she was untrustworthy, I would know by now. Just… Please.”
“I know Dick. I'm sorry.” Dick didn't respond, but simply pat him on the shoulder as the group began to clean up their dishes. “Also, I’m not doing this for the demon spawn. I’m doing this for you.”
“Thank you,” Dick said, a thankful smile on his face.
“Yeah, yeah, whatever,” Jason responded, reverting back to his indifferent disguise.
While their argument was rambling on, you and Damian were in your own world. The two of you were discussing school, and as you gave him pointers on how to kick ass in dodgeball (yes, you were your school’s champion dodgeball player when you attended, and you were determined to pass on your skills to someone), he interrupted you. “Tt, (Y/L/N). I am a trained assassin. Do you really think that I would be incapable of winning a game of dodgeball?”
“I guarantee that you wouldn’t win against me. I’m basically a professional dodgeball player. I don’t care who you were trained by or for what purpose,” you told him, one eyebrow raised.
“That is a challenge you won’t be able to follow through with. It is foolish to think you would beat me in a game of dodgeball.”
“Oh really, mister “I’m an assassin”? You can’t sneak up on me in dodgeball,” you told him in a mocking tone. It was a bit childish, but you could tell the ‘friendly competition’ going on was good for him. And as an added bonus: It was a sport where he couldn’t kill someone (hopefully?).
Lunch continued and you ended up spending a few more hours at the manor getting to know the family even better. You left that day with a promise to beat Damian in dodgeball and more security in a family you never even knew you'd have.
Current Taglist: @aworldwideapart @darlin-you-bitch @fma-hawks-eye @left-boob-chris @dead-lee-15 @jasonpnerd @purple–nebula @alicethecactus@cookies186 @multi-fanndommadness @zuni21798 @carryonmy-assbutt @katykyll @purelittleblueberry @damianwaynedeservedbetter @peachykeen3502 @4evahevah TAGS IN BOLD DO NOT WORK If you wish to be added to the taglist, just shoot me a message, ask, or reply, and I’ll add you!
#damian wayne#damian wayne x reader#damian wayne x you#dick grayson#dick grayson x reader#dick grayson x you#richard grayson#richard grayson x reader#richard grayson x you#robin#robin x reader#robin x you#nightwing#nightwing x reader#nightwing x you#batfam#batfam x reader#batfam x you#bruce wayne#batman#jason todd#red hood#tim drake#red robin#alfred pennyworth#katelyn writes#buddy and ummi
593 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thought-Criminal Jordan Peterson Versus Cathy Newman & The Baader-Meinhof Gang
I say now that it is impossible to deny that the majority of news media in the Western world is little more than a machine for manufacturing Neo-Marxist opinions.
The reason I say this with such certainty is that the body of evidence to support this conclusion is now insurmountable. The idea of an impartial media no longer exists. The proof of this is revealed whenever the topic of identity politics comes up. When you see Daily Mail columnists stumping for feminist ideology, we are in serious trouble. Welcome to Pravda reality.
The catalyst comes from a simply stunning interview that took place on British television last week. If you haven't seen the utter demolition of feminist thought conducted -or should I say committed- by Jordan Peterson yet; you are late to the fun.
youtube
For analysis of the absolute hammering that Channel 4 News' Cathy Newman took in this 30-minute conversation, look no further than Douglas Murray in the Spectator.
If I was Channel 4 I would take it down. If I was Cathy Newman I would sue or seek a super-injunction. I don’t think I have ever witnessed an interview that is more catastrophic for the interviewer. - Douglas Murray
Always grateful for advice from @DouglasKMurray but I won’t be suing or taking out a super-injunction. I thoroughly enjoyed my bout with @jordanbpeterson as did 100s of 1000s of our viewers. Viva feminism, viva free speech. Stay tuned Douglas.
— Cathy Newman (@cathynewman) January 17, 2018
As is so often the case, when a feminist gets shown to be a public fraud the engines of spin fire up. The justification for the damage control exercise was laid at the end of the interview with Peterson itself. Newman points out that critics of Peterson get lambasted online, and claims "there's a lot of it [abuse] out there." I'm sure you can see where this is going.
Such is the scale of threat we @Channel4News are having to get security specialists in to carry out an analysis. I will not hesitate to get the police involved if necessary. What a terrible indictment of the times we live in.
— Ben de Pear (@bendepear) January 19, 2018
Mr. de Pear is basing this drama on using the search function to find instances of the word 'bitch' in the comments below the Youtube video. Of over 50,000 comments, he found 500 occurrences. If we are charitable and assume that all of these comments are directly calling Newman a bitch, we have 1% of the comments being misogynistic. As we know that there are many uses of the word bitch that are not directed at Newman, let alone the many different contexts, and not to mention that this is the comments section of YouTube which is both a cess-pit and full of people calling each other 'bitch' all day every day.
Apparently, this outpouring of hate was amusing to Newman, who was snapped by her producer laughing at the so-called threats as the police were called.
The police have evidently decided not to proceed with charging anyone, or you can be certain that would be front page news. Instead, Channel 4 has hired a 'security expert' to deal with the imminent fedora-Jihad.
Speaking of the news, what angle do you suppose the media are taking? Of course, the reasoned and polite Peterson thrashing the living daylights out of their colleague for the world to see is not newsworthy. Alleged abuse? Now we're talking.
Quick as a flash, the media rallies around their wounded comrade to build the narrative that regardless of the content of the debate -in which Newman effectively tried to call Peterson a white supremacist while apologizing for Maoist philosophy- the real story, as always, is online misogyny.
The reality that Peterson calmly broke down the hail of inept leftist barbs from Newman with grace, politeness and factual positions is irrelevant. The important thing to note is that Peterson is On The Wrong Side Of History And Might Be A Thought Criminal Associated With The Alt-Right And That Is Bad. Please consult your local commissariat for re-education if you found yourself swayed by any unauthorized arguments.
News media personalities were quick to shift to the "misogyny abuse" narrative. Its all they have. Cathy Newman acted in bad faith. She continuously attempted to put words in his mouth, deliberately misquoting him. She was wholly unprofessional & SHOULD get harsh criticism. pic.twitter.com/PtF8mdoQyV
— ☢S.C.R.U.M.P. - Call of Bants (@CheekiScrump) January 21, 2018
The bizarreness continued as Twitter commentators have had a field day pointing out inconsistencies. Indeed, why is it that left wingers get a free pass from behaving terribly, but moderate centrists (or worse) like Jordan Peterson get pilloried? The double standards are quite surreal and signify a dangerous trend in Western society.
My friend @RektRolfe hit the nail on the head: If a conservative says ANYTHING & gets hounded online, the narrative is "freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences of speech." But as soon as its somone on the left that goes out of the window. Its "harassment & abuse.: pic.twitter.com/K1lWOIDTeT
— ☢S.C.R.U.M.P. - Call of Bants (@CheekiScrump) January 21, 2018
The answer is clear. The leftist needs to be shielded from critique at all costs. When the leftist ideology is exposed by an expert interlocutor like Peterson, there is no chance of a victory by fair means. Peterson knows this and has offered Newman another bite at the cherry, which has as much chance of happening as I have of winning an Olympic medal.
How about, instead, we talk again, and try to have a real conversation? You know, where reasonable people try to exchange information instead of where two primates clash for dominance? @cathynewman
— Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) January 21, 2018
In the absence of evidence or champions in the realm of debate to fight the cause fairly, the leftist narrative must thus be protected by foul tactics instead. These tactics include but are not limited to misdirection, denigration, slander, and misrepresentation. In this way, two goals are achieved.
First, Jordan Peterson is further pushed to the 'right' of the political spectrum, by a mass-media assault on what it even means to be in the center. Only the far-right engage in such misogyny, only the far-right are 'transphobic' so, therefore, Peterson must be at best an enabler and at worst far-right himself. Nevermind that he has been an academic at liberal institutions for over three decades and has taught for years about the dangers of National-Socialist thought. The Overton Window is dragged to the left by framing Peterson's supporters as uniformly far-right. This happens because Peterson's positions in this instance are unassailable through debate or dialectic.
Second, the brand of Jordan Peterson is tainted by association with events that are roundly branded as controversial by the media. The idea that the state should mandate what words come out of your mouth should be controversial, not the resistance to it. The idea that men and women are biologically different and that results in different life outcomes but should not entail unfair treatment to either sex is only controversial if you are at some level corrupted by Neo-Marxist ideology.
Save your clicks, here is the hilarious top hits from this garbage. pic.twitter.com/Z0V8FXs0oZ
— Ash Sharp 🇬🇧 🇵🇱 (@6crip) January 21, 2018
It is now mandatory for the hive-minded and spiritually bereft media complex to reference these events every time Peterson makes an appearance. There is a great line from the discussion with Newman where she asks what right Peterson has to comment on such matters that she feels must only be spoken of from a feminist perspective. He replies;
"Because I am a clinical psychologist."
This answer seems to be a perfect one; except that to Neo-Marxists, professional competence always comes second to the pursuit of ideological purity. This is the equality of outcomes that is demanded by leftists- your skill, your person, is second to your ideological purity.
In the media and in future encounters with the Neo-Marxists who operate and control the flow of mass-market information, Peterson is as good as a Nazi. The redefinition and misrepresentation of language itself will continue until morale is destroyed. There is an angering game one can play when presented with a story like this one. Imagine if the roles were reversed, and Peterson was interrogating Newman in this combative style, pushing and poking at feminist thought. The outcry against such misogyny would ring across the planet- and yet it would still only be a battle of ideas. As I said in a recent piece about art on this site, Identity Politics has infected our society to the extent that what we perceive as a mainstream television interview is impossible for the media to analyze without resorting to this Neo-Marxist ideological framework. The fact that Peterson can defend his ideas against Newman's weak critical theory interrogation is a clear sign that Peterson is oppressing her. Viva feminism, indeed.
While this drama has been playing out I noticed a parallel bleeding through. Last night I watched a film called the Baader-Meinhof Complex. I highly recommend you see this film to gather an insight into how the mind of the radical leftist actually works- as a former anarchist myself I recognize many of the logical reasonings of the Rote Armee Fraktion in the thought processes of myself and my former associates.
The leftist ideologues of the Baader-Meinhof gang believed in the Communist struggle against Western Imperialism in Vietnam and Israel, and therefore alliances with Islamic terrorists was perfectly logical. The deaths of Vietnamese civilians was cause to bomb civilians, police and military targets in Germany. The primary issue with ideologues -particularly leftist ideologues- is that they see ideology everywhere except within themselves.
The point is that the Baader-Meinhof gang follow the same fundamental principles of thought that the leftist critics of Peterson follow. While I do not imagine Cathy Newman as being some kind of modern Ulrike Meinhof ready to denounce her opponents as pigs who can be legitimately murdered, the posing of her ideological positions as reasonable despite their extremity is interesting to me. Newman appeared offended by the idea that the ideology of trans-activists was Maoist. The concept that leftist ideology today is related to that murderous diktat followed by Mao, Stalin, and the Baader-Meinhof is alien to her. I hope she would not be offended if I said that this attitude is that of the useful idiot- a partisan mouthpiece for political positions that she does not understand in full. If Newman did understand her own professed ideology, then she might well not hold those beliefs any longer.
Feminism is Neo-Marxist.
I do not intend these words to offend, but then as Peterson points out in the interview, in order to think I must accept I may offend someone. Newman and her ilk are engaged in a permanent struggle to paint themselves as the moral superior to everyone else, as all subscribers to Marxism must. In this way, you -the consumer of news products- are being forced to accept their position to be true, or else you are a bigot, a sexist, et cetera.
This is exactly what Mao, Che Guevara, and the Baader-Meinhof gang did too, to various degrees. While the modern supremacist will clearly delineate that they believe the black or the Jew is the Untermensch, the Neo-Marxist is more subtle but more deadly by far. The totalitarian left understands that human emotions are powerful and the manipulation of these, coupled with the desire within us to be doing a 'moral'act -whatever our perception of that concept is- this is a powerful method of creating compliance. In the cause of righteousness, Baader-Meinhof terrorists kidnapped, bombed and hijacked. With the best of intentions -according to him, at least- Mao gave the order to liquidate and starve millions, and millions complied.
Thorwald Proll, Horst Söhnlein, Andreas Baader and Gudrun Ensslin.
As I've said in these pages before, now that the attempt to control the world through economics has failed, the Neo-Marxists live through control of culture. The difference between Newman's special pleading and Ulrike Meinhof's rigid and violent dogma is not as huge as any of us might like to think. The core concept both Newman and Meinhof considered true is that someone, somewhere, is a victim. For the noble goal of saving that victim, all manner of tyranny against perceived oppressors is not only justifiable but eminently desirable. In the 1970s when there was a possibility of Communist hegemony, guns and bombs were used. Today, the gun is out of fashion but the pen -or keyboard- is more powerful than ever.
As Peterson himself writes;
The dangers of self-deception about past events, far from trivial in the personal case, are tremendously magnified in the social arena. The careless use of memory can lead directly to the grave abuse of people.
Conducted daily through the media and politicized social media complex is a reframing of history, even up to events of a few moments ago. In thirty years, who will choose to watch a thirty-minute interview between a now-elderly psychologist and feminist journalist? A few, perhaps. How many more will know the story, but only know the story as it is stored in our collective cultural memory and its replacement/augmentative structure, the internet?
The narrative shaped today will persist like never before in human history, which is why it is so important to not allow this abuse of reality by mainstream media ideologues to pass without protest.
from Republic Standard http://ift.tt/2G3zdNH via IFTTT
0 notes