#social media revolution

[squaredtech]

Bluesky is transforming the social media landscape on personalization and user control. From customizable feeds to starter packs and custom domain handles, the platform empowers users to tailor their experience like never before. Whether exploring interest-based feeds, refining your thread view, or personalizing your handle, Bluesky offers tools that set it apart from platforms like X (Twitter) or Threads. With over 15 million users and counting, more than a network—it’s your space to create, explore, and connect.

[drcpanda12]

New Post has been published on https://www.knewtoday.net/exploring-web-3-0-the-rise-of-decentralized-social-platforms/

Exploring Web 3.0: The Rise of Decentralized Social Platforms

Welcome to the world of Web 3.0, where the Internet is evolving into a decentralized and user-centric ecosystem. In this new era, traditional social media platforms are being reimagined, giving rise to innovative and decentralized social sites. These platforms are built on emerging technologies like blockchain, aiming to empower users with greater control over their data and online interactions.

In this article, we will delve into the concept of Web 3.0 and explore some of the popular decentralized social sites that are shaping the future of social networking. We will examine platforms like Steemit, Mastodon, Solid, Scuttlebutt, and Handshake, each offering unique features and approaches to foster a more open, transparent, and user-driven online experience.

Join us on this journey as we dive into the world of Web 3.0 social sites, discovering how they are revolutionizing social networking and challenging the status quo. Get ready to embrace a new era of digital interactions, where users have the power to shape their online presence and reclaim ownership of their data.

Understanding Web 3.0: The Evolution of the Internet

Web 3.0 is the next phase of internet development, representing a paradigm shift from the current centralized model to a more decentralized and user-centric approach. It aims to address some of the limitations and concerns of Web 2.0, such as data privacy, control, and the dominance of tech giants.

In Web 3.0, the focus is on empowering users and giving them greater control over their data and online interactions. Decentralization plays a crucial role in this vision, enabled by technologies like blockchain. Web 3.0 seeks to create a more open, transparent, and secure internet ecosystem where individuals have ownership and agency over their digital presence.

Key aspects of Web 3.0 include:

Decentralization: Web 3.0 leverages decentralized technologies, such as blockchain, to distribute data and authority across a network of participants rather than relying on centralized entities.

User Control: Web 3.0 emphasizes user ownership and control over personal data, enabling individuals to decide how their information is shared and used.

Interoperability: Web 3.0 aims to establish interoperability among various platforms, allowing seamless data transfer and interaction between different applications and services.

Openness and Transparency: Web 3.0 promotes transparency by making data and algorithms more accessible, enabling users to understand and verify how platforms operate.

Trust and Security: Through cryptographic protocols and consensus mechanisms, Web 3.0 enhances trust and security, reducing the reliance on third-party intermediaries.

Web 3.0 is still an evolving concept, and its full realization is yet to be achieved. However, it holds the potential to revolutionize the internet by placing users at the center and transforming how we interact, transact, and share information online.

The Promise of Decentralization: Empowering Users

Decentralization is a fundamental principle and promise of Web 3.0, offering numerous advantages and transformative potential. Here are some key promises and benefits associated with decentralization:

Enhanced User Empowerment: Decentralized systems aim to empower individuals by giving them greater control over their data, online identity, and digital assets. Users are no longer at the mercy of centralized entities that dictate terms and conditions.

Data Privacy and Security: Centralized platforms often collect and store vast amounts of user data, raising concerns about privacy and security. Decentralization distributes data across a network, reducing the risk of single points of failure and unauthorized access. Users have more control over their data, deciding what to share and with whom.

Reduced Intermediaries: Decentralized systems aim to eliminate or minimize the need for intermediaries, such as social media companies or financial institutions. By leveraging blockchain technology and smart contracts, users can directly interact and transact with each other, reducing costs, delays, and dependency on third parties.

Censorship Resistance: Centralized platforms have the authority to moderate and censor content, which can raise concerns about freedom of expression. Decentralized platforms strive to provide a more censorship-resistant environment, where content moderation decisions are made collectively or by consensus, reducing the potential for biased or arbitrary censorship.

Community Governance: Decentralized systems often involve community governance models, where decision-making power is distributed among participants. This allows users to have a say in the development, rules, and direction of the platform, fostering a more democratic and inclusive environment.

Interoperability and Seamless Experiences: Decentralization enables interoperability between different platforms and applications. Users can seamlessly interact, transfer data, and utilize services across various decentralized ecosystems, creating a more connected and integrated digital experience.

Innovation and Openness: Decentralized systems encourage innovation by providing open-source protocols and standards. Developers can build on existing infrastructure, contributing to the growth and evolution of the ecosystem as a whole.

While decentralization offers promising benefits, it also presents challenges such as scalability, governance complexities, and user experience design. However, the pursuit of decentralization continues to shape the future of the Internet, providing an alternative model that prioritizes individual empowerment, privacy, and open collaboration.

Blockchain Technology: Enabling Web 3.0 Social Platforms

Blockchain technology is a foundational component of Web 3.0 and plays a significant role in enabling decentralization, security, and trust in various applications. It is a distributed ledger system that records and verifies transactions across a network of computers, known as nodes. Here are some key aspects of blockchain technology:

Decentralization: Blockchain operates in a decentralized manner, where multiple nodes participate in validating and maintaining the integrity of the ledger. This decentralized consensus mechanism removes the need for a central authority, providing transparency and resilience.

Immutable and Transparent Ledger: Transactions recorded on a blockchain are permanent and tamper-proof. Once a transaction is added to the blockchain, it becomes extremely difficult to alter or manipulate the data, ensuring the integrity of the system. This transparency allows users to verify transactions and builds trust within the network.

Cryptographic Security: Blockchain uses advanced cryptographic techniques to secure transactions and data. Each transaction is cryptographically linked to the previous transaction, forming a chain of blocks. This makes it computationally impractical to modify past transactions without the consensus of the network.

Smart Contracts: Smart contracts are self-executing agreements coded on the blockchain. They automatically execute predefined actions when specific conditions are met. Smart contracts enable trustless and decentralized execution of agreements, eliminating the need for intermediaries and providing automation and transparency.

Tokenization: Blockchain technology facilitates the creation and management of digital tokens. These tokens can represent various assets, such as cryptocurrencies, digital collectibles, or even real-world assets like real estate or shares. Tokenization enables fractional ownership, increased liquidity, and new business models.

Public and Private Blockchains: Public blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum are open to anyone and rely on a distributed network of nodes for consensus. Private blockchains, on the other hand, are permissions and restrict access to a specific group of participants. They are often used by enterprises for internal purposes, maintaining privacy and control over data.

Scalability and Interoperability: Blockchain technology has faced challenges with scalability, particularly in public blockchains. However, various solutions such as layer-2 protocols and sharding are being developed to address these issues. Interoperability protocols are also being explored to enable seamless communication and interaction between different blockchains.

Blockchain technology has far-reaching implications beyond cryptocurrencies, extending to areas such as supply chain management, healthcare, finance, voting systems, and more. Its decentralized nature, security features, and ability to enable trust and transparency have the potential to revolutionize various industries and reshape the way we exchange value and interact online

Steemit: Rewarding Content Creation and Curation

Steemit is a blockchain-based social media platform that was launched in 2016. It operates on the Steem blockchain and provides users with the opportunity to create and curate content while earning cryptocurrency rewards. Here are some key features and aspects of Steemit:

Content Creation and Curation: Steemit allows users to create and publish content in the form of articles, blog posts, videos, and more. Users can also curate content by upvoting and commenting on posts they find interesting or valuable.

Steem Cryptocurrency and Rewards: Steemit has its native cryptocurrency called Steem. Users can earn Steem tokens by creating and curating content. The rewards are distributed based on the popularity and quality of the content, as determined by the community through upvotes and engagement.

Decentralized and Transparent: Steemit operates on a decentralized blockchain, ensuring transparency and immutability of content and transactions. Blockchain technology enables a trustless environment, where users have control over their data and interactions.

Reputation System: Steemit has a reputation system that measures the credibility and influence of users based on their activity and engagement on the platform. This reputation score helps in determining the weightage of their votes and the visibility of their content.

Community Engagement: Steemit encourages community engagement and collaboration. Users can follow each other, join communities based on shared interests, and participate in discussions. The platform provides an opportunity for users to connect and build relationships with like-minded individuals.

Monetization Opportunities: Steemit provides users with the opportunity to monetize their content. Successful and popular creators can earn significant rewards in the form of Steem tokens, which can be exchanged for other cryptocurrencies or fiat currencies.

Open Source and Development Community: Steemit is an open-source project, allowing developers to contribute to its development and create additional features and applications around the Steem blockchain. This fosters innovation and the growth of the ecosystem.

It’s important to note that while Steemit gained popularity as one of the early blockchain-based social media platforms, the landscape of Web 3.0 and decentralized social platforms is constantly evolving. There may be newer platforms or updates to existing ones that provide similar or enhanced features compared to Steemit.

Mastodon: Building Federated Communities

Mastodon is a decentralized, open-source social networking platform that operates on the principles of federation. It was launched in 2016 as an alternative to centralized social media platforms, offering users greater control over their data and fostering community engagement. Here are some key aspects of Mastodon:

Federation: Mastodon operates on a federated model, where multiple servers called “instances” are interconnected. Each instance is independently operated and can have its own rules and community guidelines. However, users from different instances can interact and follow each other, creating a decentralized network.

Decentralization and User Control: Mastodon emphasizes decentralization and user control over data. Instead of relying on a central server, user data is distributed across multiple instances, reducing the dependency on a single entity. Users can choose the instance that aligns with their preferences or even set up their own instance.

Timeline and Posts: Similar to other social media platforms, Mastodon allows users to post updates, photos, videos, and links. These posts appear in the users’ timelines and can be viewed and interacted with by their followers.

Privacy and Moderation: Mastodon gives users control over their privacy settings. They can choose to make their posts public, limited to their followers, or even private. Instances can also establish their own moderation policies to ensure a safe and respectful environment.

Community Engagement: Mastodon fosters community engagement by allowing users to follow each other, interact through comments and mentions, and participate in discussions. Users can discover and join various communities based on shared interests by following relevant accounts and hashtags.

Open Source and Interoperability: Mastodon is an open-source project, meaning its source code is freely available for inspection and modification. This encourages transparency, innovation, and the development of compatible applications and extensions.

Mobile and Desktop Apps: Mastodon has a range of mobile and desktop applications that allow users to access the platform from different devices. These apps provide a user-friendly interface for browsing timelines, posting updates, and engaging with others.

Mastodon has gained popularity as a decentralized and privacy-focused alternative to traditional social media platforms. Its federated nature allows for diverse communities and instances to exist while still providing interconnectivity and communication between users.

Solid: Taking Control of Your Personal Data

Solid is an open-source project and web decentralization initiative led by World Wide Web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee. It aims to reshape the way the web works by giving users control over their personal data and enabling them to choose how and where their data is stored and accessed. Here are some key aspects of Solid:

Personal Data Ownership: Solid puts individuals in control of their personal data. Instead of storing data on centralized servers owned by companies, Solid allows users to store their data in personal online data stores, called Pods. Users have full ownership and control over their Pods, deciding who can access their data and under what conditions.

Pod-Based Architecture: Solid follows a pod-based architecture, where data is stored in Pods hosted on servers of the user’s choice. Each Pod represents a user’s personal data store, which can be hosted on their own server or by a trusted service provider. This distributed approach ensures data privacy, security, and user empowerment.

Linked Data Principles: Solid utilizes Linked Data principles to enable interoperability and data sharing between different applications and Pods. Data stored in Pods is structured using semantic web technologies, making it machine-readable and allowing for seamless integration and aggregation of data across platforms.

Reusable Data and Applications: With Solid, users can grant permissions to different applications to access and utilize their data stored in Pods. This data interoperability allows for the creation of reusable applications that can leverage user data with explicit consent, promoting data portability and reducing data silos.

Privacy and Security: Solid emphasizes privacy and security by design. Users have granular control over their data, determining who can access specific pieces of information within their Pods. Solid also supports encryption and authentication mechanisms to ensure secure data storage and access.

Developer-Friendly: Solid provides developers with a set of open standards, protocols, and application programming interfaces (APIs) to build Solid-compliant applications. This encourages the development of a decentralized ecosystem of applications that respect user data rights and can seamlessly interact with Pods.

The vision behind Solid is to enable a more user-centric, privacy-preserving, and interoperable web, where individuals can reclaim control over their data and choose how they interact with online services. By decentralizing data storage and facilitating data ownership, Solid aims to address concerns related to data privacy, surveillance, and user empowerment in the digital age.

Scuttlebutt: Privacy-Focused Offline Social Networking

Scuttlebutt is a decentralized peer-to-peer social networking protocol and platform that focuses on privacy, offline access, and community building. It allows users to connect and communicate with others directly, without relying on a centralized server. Here are some key aspects of Scuttlebutt:

Decentralization: Scuttlebutt operates in a decentralized manner, with no central server or authority. Users store their data locally on their devices and share it with others through a peer-to-peer network. This architecture promotes resilience, privacy, and independence from centralized platforms.

Offline Access: One of the unique features of Scuttlebutt is its ability to work offline. Users can compose messages, update their profiles, and interact with others even when they don’t have an internet connection. When they come back online, their data is synchronized with other users’ devices.

Privacy and Security: Scuttlebutt emphasizes privacy by default. Users control their own data and can choose what information to share with others. Communication on Scuttlebutt is encrypted, ensuring that messages and data remain private and secure.

Community and Relationships: Scuttlebutt fosters the formation of communities and relationships through a concept called “pubs.” Users connect to pubs, which act as hubs for sharing and discovering content from other users within the network. Pubs enable users to find and follow people with similar interests.

Synchronization and Replication: Scuttlebutt uses a process called “gossiping” to synchronize data across the network. Devices share updates with each other, replicating and propagating changes. This enables users to have a consistent view of the network, even with intermittent or limited connectivity.

Extensibility and Modularity: Scuttlebutt is designed to be extensible, allowing developers to build custom applications and modules on top of the protocol. This flexibility enables the creation of diverse and specialized social applications that cater to different user needs.

Open Source: Scuttlebutt is an open-source project, which means its code is available for anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to. This promotes transparency, innovation, and community-driven development.

Scuttlebutt provides an alternative approach to social networking, focusing on user privacy, community building, and offline accessibility. Its decentralized architecture and emphasis on user control aim to address concerns associated with centralized social media platforms and promote a more resilient and user-centric internet experience.

Handshake: Decentralized Domain Name System

Handshake is a decentralized, blockchain-based protocol that aims to create a more secure, censorship-resistant, and decentralized internet naming system. It introduces a new peer-to-peer root DNS (Domain Name System) that replaces the traditional hierarchical DNS system. Here are some key aspects of Handshake:

Decentralized Naming System: Handshake aims to decentralize the process of domain name registration and ownership. It allows users to register top-level domains (TLDs) directly on the Handshake blockchain, removing the need for centralized domain registrars. This enables greater ownership and control of domain names.

Blockchain Technology: Handshake operates on its own blockchain, which is a distributed and immutable ledger that records domain name ownership and transactions. The blockchain ensures transparency, security, and censorship resistance, as changes to domain records are recorded and verified by network participants.

Name Auctions: Handshake introduces a unique name auction mechanism to allocate domain names. Users can bid on and acquire domain names through an open and transparent auction process. This helps prevent domain squatting and promotes fair and competitive ownership of domain names.

Community Governance: Handshake’s governance model involves the community of Handshake token (HNS) holders. They can participate in decision-making processes regarding protocol upgrades, modifications, and policy changes. This allows for a more inclusive and decentralized approach to managing the naming system.

Handshake Tokens (HNS): Handshake has its native cryptocurrency called Handshake Tokens (HNS). These tokens are used for bidding on domain names, participating in auctions, and incentivizing network participants who validate and secure the blockchain.

Censorship Resistance: Handshake aims to provide a more censorship-resistant internet naming system. Since the ownership and control of domain names are decentralized, it becomes difficult for any centralized authority to censor or manipulate domain registrations.

Interoperability: Handshake is designed to be compatible with existing DNS infrastructure, ensuring interoperability with the traditional Internet naming system. This allows Handshake domain names to be accessed by users on regular web browsers without any additional software or plugins.

Handshake seeks to challenge the centralized nature of traditional domain name systems by providing a decentralized alternative. By leveraging blockchain technology and community governance, it aims to create a more inclusive and secure naming system for the internet, empowering individuals and reducing reliance on centralized authorities.

Challenges and Opportunities in the Web 3.0 Social Landscape

Challenges and opportunities in the Web 3.0 social landscape are shaped by the shift towards decentralization, user ownership, and the emergence of new technologies. Here are some key challenges and opportunities:

Challenges:

User Adoption: One of the main challenges for Web 3.0 social platforms is attracting a critical mass of users. Shifting users from established centralized platforms to decentralized alternatives requires education, user-friendly interfaces, and compelling features that provide clear advantages over traditional platforms.

Scalability: Achieving scalability in decentralized networks is a significant challenge. As the user base and activity increase, maintaining fast and efficient network performance becomes crucial. Web 3.0 social platforms need to address scalability concerns to handle growing user demands.

User Experience: Providing a seamless and intuitive user experience is vital for Web 3.0 social platforms. Designing user interfaces that are as intuitive and familiar as centralized platforms can help onboard users more effectively. Improving user experience across different devices and applications within the decentralized ecosystem is essential for widespread adoption.

Interoperability: Ensuring interoperability between different Web 3.0 social platforms is a challenge. Users should be able to interact and share content seamlessly across different decentralized networks. Developing open standards and protocols that enable interoperability can foster a more connected and inclusive Web 3.0 social landscape.

Regulatory Environment: Web 3.0 social platforms may face regulatory challenges as governments and regulatory bodies adapt to decentralized technologies. Compliance with data protection, privacy, and financial regulations can be complex, and platforms need to navigate these legal frameworks to ensure long-term sustainability.

Opportunities:

Data Privacy and Ownership: Web 3.0 social platforms offer opportunities to address privacy concerns by enabling users to have greater control over their personal data. By embracing decentralized architectures and technologies like blockchain, users can retain ownership of their data and choose how it is shared and utilized.

Censorship Resistance: Web 3.0 social platforms can provide an opportunity for users to express themselves freely without the risk of censorship or content removal by centralized authorities. Decentralized networks and protocols offer a more resilient and censorship-resistant environment for open communication.

Monetization and Tokenization: Web 3.0 social platforms introduce new possibilities for users to monetize their content and participate in the value-creation process. Through tokenization and decentralized finance (DeFi) mechanisms, users can earn rewards, receive micropayments, and engage in peer-to-peer transactions, creating new economic opportunities.

Community Governance: Web 3.0 social platforms can empower users by involving them in the decision-making process through community governance models. Users can have a say in platform rules, feature development, and policy changes, fostering a sense of ownership and participation.

Innovation and Collaboration: Web 3.0 social platforms provide a fertile ground for innovation and collaboration. Developers can build on open protocols and standards, creating new applications, features, and integrations. Interactions between different decentralized platforms can lead to novel use cases, fostering creativity and experimentation.

Trust and Transparency: Web 3.0 social platforms can address trust and transparency concerns by leveraging decentralized technologies. Immutable ledgers, smart contracts, and transparent governance models enhance transparency and accountability, building trust between users and the platform.

The Web 3.0 social landscape presents both challenges and opportunities as it evolves towards decentralization and user ownership. Overcoming technical and adoption challenges while leveraging the benefits of privacy, censorship resistance, and user empowerment can pave the way for a more inclusive and user-centric social web.

[hussyknee]

This is insane. This is actually insane. If anyone had told me this could be a thing in September I would have called them a tinhat.

I've been tracking down I/P conflict recs lists and downloading as many books and articles in them as I can find. Tracked down both Leila Khaled's autobiography and her biography by Sarah Irving on LibGen as well. All of them have been uploaded to my gdrive. You can find it in the Poetry and Literature subfolder in the Palestine section. Go nuts.

Btw there's a site called "Accountability Archive" (@archivegenocide on twitter) promoting itself in the wake of all this; it's pretty sus and seems to be one of those SJ "activist" groups that exploit Global South trauma and exclude their voices. Do background checks on all your allies, folks, and look at whether they're boosting impacted communities or talking over them.

[whereserpentswalk]

Hey! Reminder that "people shouldn't feel joy or have things that make them happy when there is [bad thing] in the world" and "the common people are actually the ones at fault for this systemic issue for not doing more to stop it" are both inherently reactionary sentiments. They exist shield the ruling class from responsibility, as well as existing as an excuse to not give people rights, and to convince the common people they don't deserve to have rights. These sentiments have been the rallying cry of countless reactionary movements but zero liberatory movements. Stop spreading them.

[plrle]

Idk if you still have requests open but if yes can you draw Prieur wearing a choker with a π shaped charm (like this: https://www.amazon.com/necklace-mathematics-jewelry-math-teacher/dp/B01FLW687U) ? 🥺

sorry for the long reply! finally made it to your request :]

it seems that Prieur likes it!!

[wronghands1]

[natureposting]

[octavodeci]

The reconstruction is bullshit. You got a team of people who were too preoccupied trying to recreate a face close to the “original” while simultaneously forgetting to make their recreation look like an actual person. @scourgiez

[earlgreytea68]

I feel like every day it is going to be my act of radical rebellion to say over and over:

I love writing fiction. It's my favorite thing in the universe to do. I write because I love writing and I think writing is fun. If you give me a free and open day with zero responsibilities and ask me what I'm going to do with that day, I'm going to spend it writing fiction. It's okay to love your art.

[your-heart-is-a-treasure]

Deep down, we know it to be true. We know that possessions don't equal joy. And we know full well that our lives are too valuable to waste chasing them.

[transrevolutions]

happy 264th birthday camille desmoulins! to celebrate this momentous occasion I will be getting into petty fights with people on the internet

[eggcolomba]

From the outset of the latest Israel-Palestine conflict, the capitalist media in Britain and USA has acted as an obedient mouthpiece for the establishment, echoing their imperialist propaganda. We need to build a voice for the exploited and oppressed.

[yourgamemasterthewhiterabbit]

I have said this so many times before, but revolution is coming, it can either happen peacefully and gently, by the government conceding to meet the people's needs, or it can happen violently, but it will happen, people will not just quietly die en-mass to feed your ego.

Everyone making the choices, the 1%ers, right wing politicians, they think they can deny people reasonable access to food, to shelter, to healthcare and education, to a minimal quality of life, to security, they think they can stand in the way of progress, for profit, they think they can take away their rights over their own bodies, then convince them, the masses, the solution is individualism, to take things into their own hands, to arm themselves and wait 'for their revolution'... They literally encourage that "revolution or nothing" way of thinking as a way of keeping the population angry, and in their minds malleable and under control...

And they really think, they really think they can just ride that forever without hitting the point that it will erupt into a bloodbath... Not in some eventuality, but now, while people are dying and desperate. They think they can brazenly parade around in front of those same people protected by their class and wealth from the consequences of the system they are building, and somehow not inspire violence.

I keep trying to warn you where this will lead.

It isn't about what I want or what I think should happen, I'm not endorsing anything, let's be clear, it's about what will happen, really, it's about human nature.

This isn't about what's moral, or what's reasonable, or what you think you can stoke a divisive culture war against, it isn't about my opinion, I did not invent the nature of need, it's about what people have always done when faced with no good options, guns in their hands and staring up at the people sentencing them to suffering and death.

You give people their rights, you give them food and shelter, you give them dignity, education and a choice, or what you will get out of them is the violence of a people who's needs are being systematically denied them. Thinking you can convince people out of that is like thinking you can argue with gravity. [is that why your rockets crash?]

If you deny someone all their needs, arm them, and then tell them to either do something about it or go die in silence, what do you think will happen next? What do you genuinely expect?

There is a threshold of suffering past which no distraction will be enough.

You deny someone autonomy, you deny them safety, food, shelter, financial security, you deny them a future, you make the world hostile to them, you prove their electoral system doesn't work -or isn't working- and that partaking in the system doesn't get fair results, then you peacock around in front of them asking them "what are you going to do about it?"

They are starting to answer you.

[whereserpentswalk]

How the fuck can you consider yourself leftist if your belief is that a leftist society is the ideal but that you believe that for practicality we need to only fight for an implement centrist policies due to "practicality". Like, you do realize that "communism works on paper but it's not possible in practice" is a standard conservative talking point meant to dissmiss leftism?

This appeal to practicality, calling leftist advocates naive, and telling them to change the system from within, used to be the realm of boomer conservatives who used to be leftists, now it's the line of millennial conservatives who used to be leftists and they don't even have the politeness to call themselves conservatives. It's gotten past the point where that's even only being used agaisnt the really radical stuff, you now have people who don't want any advocacy for trans people because they see it as bad optics.

I don't remember who said it, but I once heard someone quote something to the tune of "the only way we've ever gotten any progress to happen in any span of time, is by demanding everything right now."

[aizenat]

So Donald Trump is trying to get Netanyahu to not go forward with a ceasefire because he doesn’t want Kamala getting good press from it, and these kids are protesting outside the dnc. This man is actively trying to get more Palestinians killed but sure rally against the candidate trying to at least stop the ongoing violence and killings over there. She’s so evil and genocidal.

[dailyanarchistposts]

Innovation and Cooptation

With Musk’s purchase of Twitter, we see the conclusion of a cycle of innovation and cooptation in the field of communications. In the late 20th century, the dominant political and technological models were monolithic and unidirectional: network television, mass-based political parties. In response, anarchists and other rebels experimented with independent media and underground networks, producing innovative horizontal and decentralized models like indymedia.org. Tech corporations eventually monetized these models as the participatory media of Web 2.0, such as Facebook. Yet from the turn of the century through the uprising of 2020, the lingering horizontal and participatory aspects of the internet in general and social media in particular continued to empower those who sought to achieve more self-determination—witness the “Thank you Facebook” graffiti in Tunisia after the so-called “Arab Spring” uprisings of 2010-2011.

Over the past decade, however, corporations and governments have introduced more and more online surveillance and control. Musk’s acquisition of Twitter is the latest stage in a reactionary clampdown with grim implications.

Musk and his colleagues see capitalism as a meritocracy in which the shrewdest and most hardworking competitors inexorably rise to the top. Hence, presumably, their own success.

Of course, if Musk wishes to prove that his success is not just the consequence of privilege and luck—of fortune and good fortune—he could demonstrate this easily enough by giving away his wealth, cutting his social ties, changing his name, and repeating his supposed rags-to-riches feats a second time. If he were able to climb the pyramid a second time without the benefit of growing up white in apartheid-era South Africa (setting aside the question of his father’s emerald investments for now), we might have to grant a hearing to his claims that the market has elevated him on account of his personal qualities—though that still would not show that capitalism rewards the efforts that are most beneficial for humanity.

According to the Silicon Valley narrative, platforms like Twitter are the inventions of individual entrepreneurs, propelled into being by the finance capital of canny investors.

But Twitter did not simply spring, fully formed like Athena, from the head of company co-founder Jack Dorsey. In fact, it was a modest refinement of a model already demonstrated by TXTmob, the SMS text messaging program developed by the Institute for Applied Autonomy for protests at the 2004 Democratic and Republican National Conventions.[1] Blaine Cook and Evan Henshaw-Plath, anarchist developers who worked alongside Dorsey at his previous company Odeo, helped refine TXTmob and later took the model with them into the conversations with Dorsey that gave rise to Twitter.[2]

If the unrelenting urgency of social media in general and Twitter in particular can be exhausting, that’s to be expected—the infrastructure of Twitter was originally designed for street communications during high-stakes mass mobilizations in which information must go out immediately, boiled down to its bare essentials. It’s not a coincidence that, despite its shortcomings, the platform has continued to be useful to street activists and conflict journalists.

The point here is that innovative models do not necessarily emerge from the commercial entrepreneurism of the Great Men of history and economics. More often, they emerge in the course of collective efforts to solve one of the problems created by the capitalist order. Resistance is the motor of history. Afterwards, opportunists like Musk use the outsize economic leverage that a profit-driven market grants them to buy up new technologies and turn them definitively against the movements and milieux that originally produced them.

We can identify two stages in the capitalist appropriation of the TXTmob model. In the first phase, a framework that was originally designed by volunteers for the use of ordinary protesters was transformed into a publicly traded corporation, around the same time that the open spaces of the early internet were being colonized by the for-profit surveillance systems of Web 2.0. In the second phase, this publicly traded corporation has been transformed into the private plaything of a single entitled tycoon—with consequences that remain to be seen.

Musk claims that his goal is to open up the platform for a wider range of speech. In practice, there is no such thing as “free speech” in its pure form—every decision that can shape the conditions of dialogue inevitably has implications regarding who can participate, who can be heard, and what can be said. For all we might say against them, the previous content moderators of Twitter did not prevent the platform from serving grassroots movements. We have yet to see whether Musk will intentionally target activists and organizers or simply permit reactionaries to do so on a crowdsourced basis, but it would be extremely naïve to take him at his word that his goal is to make Twitter more open.