#sid meier's civilization

[mirrutatep]

The Temple of Artemis

bluesky ♦ twitter ♦ prints ♦ tip jar

[animentality]

[gloriousgwendolinechristie]

Gwendoline Christie for Sid Meier’s Civilization VII (2025)

[notaplaceofhonour]

i like to imagine that when people say they’re “anti-civilization” they mean they just really hate turn-based strategy games by sid meier & not that they want to, like, destroy urbanized society, end human socio-cultural & technological development, & think it would be better if we all lived in the Stone Age because something something [Noble Savage Trope]

[silvianap]

⚠️ NEEWWWW (So many new contents these days!)

Gwendoline Christie has been announced as the new narrator for Sid Meier's "Civilization® VII" with a beautiful reveal trailer.

The game will be released on February 11, 2025.

(-> twitter post)

[wolrith]

civ 6 is crazy because i be cycling turns and the maori guy hits me up like "our people hold your civilization as the light of this world" and im over here blushing at the buff tan guy when suddenly ghandi calls me like "why dont your people fuck more? how are you even alive? are you stupid?"

[casualgay-mer]

i am normal

[asha-mage]

"Sid Meier's Civilization is actually about a group of immortal god kings condemned to forever struggle against each other in a never ending cosmic game in which their empires and nations are but pawns" gets brought up as a funny 'ha ha' joke about Civ, but the thing is that is the most supported reading of the game's mechanics, writing, art direction, and even trailers.

But what's really funny is that each new installment leans harder into this idea then the last. With Civ 7 making it so that leaders aren't even tied down to their 'historic' civilizations (meaning you can't even argue the 'national personification' thing anymore) and since Civs can change while leaders can't, that means that leaders are also the only constant across an entire campaign.

This means, for example, in the universe of Civilization, the likes of Gaius Octavius, Hatshepsut, Napoleon, and even Gandhi are constantly reborn, take up leadership of a small singular village, live for uncountable eons (unless slain by another Leader or dethroned), rebuild the same nation, people, empire over and over and over again with only slight variations, until one achieves victory over the others (be it by sending their people into the stars, building a society that culturally subsumes all others, conquering the world, or otherwise somehow 'winning history' by the metrics they held dear in their mortal lives) and gains...nothing as far as we know.

We don't know if they wither to dust instantly Gothel style, or reign until the heat death of the universe, or begin aging and live out a mortal life for however long remains to them. All we know for certain is that they are right back there again at the stone age as soon as the next game starts, becoming chiefs of a tribe of thatched roved houses on some unrecognizable landmass, with nothing to do but start all lover again from scratch. Build the same walls and monuments and wonders, fight the same endlessly shifting battles against the same rivals. Maybe this time Rome is stamped out in antiquity, and maybe this time is launches the first space colony. Maybe Egypt raises up the pyramids once more, and maybe they raise up the Colossus, or the Hanging Gardens, or Statue of Liberty, or the Sydney Opera House. Maybe Napoleon's France finally achieves perfect ideal democracy, or maybe his warring ways lead a coalition of Japan, China, the Gauls, and Sumerians facing off against him all over again. Maybe Gandhi decides mutually assured destruction is the only way to protect world peace. The names change, the lands and continents change, the ages change, eventually even the civilizations themselves change- Gaius finds himself the Emperor of Egypt and Hatsheput the Queen of the United States of America- but the only thing that doesn't change is the leaders. Their configurations vary and sometimes they face off against a newcomer they haven't before, but always it ultimately comes back to a group of immortal rulers- the great and the good, the wicked and the genius, the mad and the unlikely, and the just plain lucky that one and all ended up in the history books- who keep trying to take one more swing, one more run, one more turn at fulling the ambitions of their mortal life, and leading their people to glory.

Because the only way to break the cycle, to the end the game (both in universe and out) is to stop playing. Give up. Stop pushing that glowing little arrow button. Stop following the ambitions, the ideals, the dreams, the hopes that lead them here in the first place.

But just like Civ players and just like humans in general, they never do.

[acquired-stardust]

Sid Meier's Civilization Super Nintendo Entertainment System 1994

[richter10]

With the explosion of art of national version of Hatsune Miku, it would be possible to mod Civilization with the Miku versions of the Civs! :-D

[mirrutatep]

Himeji Castle

twitter ♦ prints ♦ tip jar

[lorekeeper-backset]

I think the reason that Stellaris engages me where Civilization does not is that Stellaris' universe has history. In Civ, you're starting from the literal dawn of civilization so there's no prior history to be found other than natural wonders but in Stellaris you're far from the first civilization to expand into space so there's all sorts of ancient artifacts and long dead (and even still living) alien civilizations to encounter and learn about.

Also Stellaris lets me play as fox people and I'd just a lot more customizable.

[gloriousgwendolinechristie]

Now, it’s your turn. Introducing your in-game narrator for Civilization VII, Gwendoline Christie!

[4ndj4]

Video games the Dogs would play

(headcanons)

! ! !

Cn – games they could actually "canonically" play (1972-1992)

Mdrn – games they would play in this day and age (1972-2024)

~

Mr. White

Cn: Dune

Or any rts games

I think he'd like Warcraft: Orcs and Humans the most but he didn't even get to see it 😭

Mdrn: Mount and Blade

Ridiculously kind to every npc, has to max out every relation score

I said it a billion times and I'll say it again, he likes history.

Mr. Orange

Cn: Police Quest III

I wonder why-

I guess he'd also like Street fighter, I can imagine him playing with Holdaway (Bison player??)

Mrdn: Far Cry 3

Vaas Montenegro fanboy??

Plays the whole thing in like a week, then tryhards the open world

Shits his pants every time he sees a cassowary or a rabid dog

Mr. Pink

Cn: Civilisation I

Mdrn: Oh uhm, League of Legends (I'm sorry)

I know this bitch spend hours on Civ cursing at Barbarians

Every single npc hates him

Not a hardcore stinky tryhard though...

Refuses to play female characters so people don't think he's a simp

Maybe even World of Tanks

Mr. Blonde

Cn: Wolfenstein or Doom

I mean it has to be fps games...

Shooting stuff makes him happy

Mdrn: Counter strike 1.6

Learned Russian from the players

Hates playing the counter terrorist even though he's probably better at it

Mr. Brown

Cn: Final fantasy III

Nerd.

Probably played I and II like 30 times too

Mdrn: Genshin Impact (I am so sorry)

Eula main??

Is the hardcore stinky tryhard

Maybe even Doki Doki Literature Club, hear me out on this... (he'd like Natsuki the most)

Mr. Blue

Cn: Pong (probably)

Hehe ball go left right

Mdrn: Pong (probably)

[particlejaeger]

I just had the most insane idea for a new Civ VI leader, archduke Franz Ferdinand. With the leader bonus that at the beginning of the modern era every civilization automatically declared war on all others that they don't have a military alliance with. Would it be fun? Probably not. Would it be funny? Absolutely.

[videogamepolls]