#röst

[vinterbetong]

finally figured out how to retexture shit in vtm:b. great things are in store...

[signeficunt]

>sjunger om norrland

>sjunger inte på norrländska

[mossy-paws]

Juwgen weitnew? stupid idiot mothewfucking juwgein weitnew god damn foow book cowwecting dust eating wat owd bastawd shithead idiot avataw of the whowe biggest cwown in the ciwcus waughed out of town cowboy mothewfucking juwgein weitnew

stowp pinning me whewn i tawk abouwt juwgein weitenew i hate him so much why does he have so many fucked up books why did he decide tuwu fuck awound awnd find out juwst set thewm woose iws he dead iws he a bastawd man has such a viscewaw affect own me nowt even in the woom nevew seen thiws mans face awnd i know he has the wowwds shittiest beawd get away fwom me

if i wanted tuwu get intwo heaven awnd god said juwgein weitnews waiting inside i wouwd piss own gods feet fow the sowe puwpose of getting sent bawck down

if i have tuwu deaw with juwgein weitnew speaking owne wowd in pewson own voice in podcast nowt onwy wiww i cwose the tab i wiww dewete my bookmawk out of spite awnd have tuwu wewatch the entiwe sewies again fow the expewience of being abwe tuwu skip aww the times whewn he iws mentioned ow awive

i dont even know why i hate him so much. he cowwects books but i am juwst mad because i am angy

he bettew have sowme fucked up backstowy tuwu expwain thiws if hes juwst sowme wich shithead whos a fan of cweepypasta awnd wanted the iww vewsion iww gow ham

bettew have had a book make him kiww a man cuz if he didnt im going tuwu make him

paypaw.com/ifuckinghatejuwgeinweitnew

episodes nowt even abouwt him. vaguewy mentioned whawt iws supposed tuwu maybe be hiws wibwawy awnd i wost iwt

whewe the fuck iws juwgein weitnew if hes stiww awive im going tuwu so deepwy wish he wasnt

cwusty owd man

iww punch weitnew awnd hiws sad fwaiw owd man twig bones wiww simpwy fwake apawt undew my epic huge meat fist awnd he wiww disintegwate untiw aww thats weft iws owne finaw book he kept own him at aww times simpwy titwed now uwu fucked up

I’m sorry I HAD too

[coolcrazycoffeecat]

Min mamma tittade upp från mobilen, kommenterade, ”och varför ligger hon där i sport-bh och disktrasa och åmar sig” innan hon tittade ner i mobilen igen

[shiroselia]

Älskar när folk har lite unika röster <3

[sistermp3old]

i want her so bad

[tinkerreise]

Un lingua por le tuttimond, Caj Lundgren (Kajenn), 30.8.1968

Un lingua por le tuttimond

es por le common good:

collage di grand vocabel-fond

futt immer understood.

Que tu commandas in un blinq

structuram je te jur!

Car if tu parlas für ou sinq

comprendas auch mixtur.

[four-ravens-in-a-trenchcoat]

So this was originally a vent post, but it broke containment a bit and I've seen lots of angry/disillusioned people in the notes so now that I've calmed down and done more research I'll return to this (still in English because I think it broke sweblr containment too, but sources will be in Swedish). @svenskjavel since I blame you for my notes, please reblog this version too

First off, what is chat control 2.0?

In 2022, Ylva Johansson (Swedish politician from Socialdemokraterna) put forward a proposition to EU to combat CSAM dubbed chat control by critics. That version was worse than the current (all digital communication scanned, no way to "consent", encryption broken after the message is sent instead of scanning before encryption but security-wise it makes no difference) which is still horrible. Since then, it's been hotly debated and was blocked by the European parliament last year.

Chat control 2.0 is an attempt at a compromise made by Belgium who are currently chair of the European Council which has the same integrity, misuse and security problems.

Will this 100% pass now?

Fortunately not, but it's a step on the way. Let's talk about the EU desicion process: There are three instances. The EU Comission puts forward propositions and the Council and Parliament pass the laws.

The Council consists of ministers from EU countries who represent the country's interest. In Sweden (and I assume other countries as well), they're members of the Government (regeringen alltså) who are supposed to listen to EU-nämnden (EU committee) which consists of 17 members of parliament (riksdagen) with party affiliation according to the latest riksdag election in 2022. But ultimately, the Government decides (but may get a declaration of no confidence from parliament).

It's in the European Council that this proposition might pass, if France also decides to support it (can't find my source for that, sorry). I've also seen some things about a special way to pass it in the council which would pass it easier? Either way, it seems to look bad even though the desicion has been postponed for now. This is not just a Sweden problem. I haven't found a list of what different countries will vote for or what they voted on the earlier proposal, but look it up in your country. It's enough countries to be worried.

The European Parliament represents the people and this is what EU elections elect. The law still has to pass there, so all hope is not lost. More people in the Parliament seem more negative to chat control, so we have a good chance still. If you look at the Swedish parties represented in both riksdagen and EU, some parties (like M) are for chat control on a national level but against it in the EU. There is also a third version of the proposition made by the Parliament which may be better, but I don't know what changes it contains.

So, what happened during the meeting?

A Swedish desicion was fast-tracked by presenting and voting about the proposition in a justice committe meeting instead of the EU committee. The announcement was made by the chair of the EU committee (from Moderaterna) literally two minutes before the meeting in question. Yes, really.

The proposition was passed with only C and SD making official protests. Since S, M and KD hold 9 out of 17 places and like chat control 2.0, it doesn't really matter what the other parties think. Still, Miljöpartiet (MP) and Vänsterpartier (V) whose parties are against chat control 2.0 didn't make any reservations. They have one member each.

What has MP and V said afterwards?

Gudrun Nordborg (V) claims it was a mistake since the process was so rushed and that she should have made an official protest. She made a facebook post afterwards to apologise and make clear that V is still against chat control 2.0. The party claims she mistook the Belgian compromise (chat control 2.0) for the Parliament version.

As for David Ling (MP), it's a bit of a civil war. The party claimed it was a honest mistake just like for Nordborg, but leaked internal posts from him show that he voted for the compromise since he liked it. Lots of people in MP are understandably very angry about it. He also got an angry call from the party leader about it. In the EU parliament, MP is still against chat control 2.0.

So on a whole, the situation is less bad and more nuanced than I made it out in the original post, but please do write to your representatives if you live in an EU county. If you live in Sweden, I'll drop a link to an email builder from one of the sources linked in the previous reblog. Read their FAQs for more information on the consequences of chat control 2.0 (including technical questions) and their collection of Swedish parties' opinions and previous actions in this matter.

Fuck this shit

Now Sweden gives thumbs-up to chat control 2.0, an awful proposition which would require digital communication providers to allow government access to encrypted private messages ("but only photo, video and links now :):):) not literally every digital communication you do :):):)"). This is a massive invasion to personal integrity, a fucking data security risk and an "'accidentally' surveilled the groups I like to opress or my political opponents a bit, oops" risk, especially in the more authoritarian countries. All to find, you know it, child porn and grooming (this will of course not catch teens sending consensual nudes, vacation pictures of babies on beaches sent to family members or normal porn and waste massive resources on scanning and processing "suspect" content).

Did I mention this sucks yet? They didn't even ask the government people supposed to decide our stance on EU politics, just the justice committee. During a single meeting, no debate. Sweden's desicion means a larger probablility that this passes in EU.

And you know what? Two parties which my views generally align with, who before the election NOT EVEN TWO WEEKS AGO, one of which I voted for partly because of their stance on this (no to mass surveillance, personal integrity is important) BOTH DID A 180 AND VOTED FOR CHAT CONTROL. One thing if parties I don't like and don't vote for do this, but I trusted these fuckers to have at least a little backbone/common sense. Also why did the nationalistic and generally shitty party SD vote no to this. Why do only they and C think this is a bad idea.

In other news, I've written to my first representative today to express my disappointment. I hope this doesn't pass silently.

[ladymcawesomeville]

Maria Sur♥️

[vinterbetong]

the only thing that'll improve throwing your guts up is your boyfriend grinding against your ass the whole time telling you how nasty you are

[poppyy-04]

En till ballad... suck

[nordic-hedge-witch]

Mitt problem är väl främst att praktiskt taget ingen överhuvudtaget sagt att Loreen var sämst och borde ha fått 0 poäng, vilket är vad varenda kommentar av den första typen försöker antyda. Det blir så jävla barnsligt när man nämner att hon inte fick flest röster och att det kanske tyder på att juryn inte är rimlig och svaret blir "JAHA DU VILL SÄKERT ATT HON SKA SLUTA GÖRA MUSIK OCKSÅ OCH BRÄNNA SIN STUDIO OCH BÖRJA FLIPPA BURGARE" eller liknande trams.

Faktum är att folket röstade in henne som tvåa, inte som vinnare. Hon fick inte flest röster, och där är konversationen slut för mig.

”Loreen förtjänade att vinna. Bortsett från jury rösterna fick hon dessutom näst mest från folket också. Att låtsas som att hon var dålig och att hennes placering var 99% juryn blir kontraproduktivt när man försöker argumentera för folkets inflytande” och ”Käärijä förtjänade vinsten mer, folkets röster väger tyngre än juryn och det är sjukt att ett gäng på 200 kändisars åsikt ska ha sån påverkan” är två påståenden som kan och borde samexistera

[fidgetspringer]

Out of curiosity: how big is Röst? He looks so big on those christmas hike pictures, but ESS are usually quite small (like 17 to 25 kg right?)

Also he is a very handsome man

He's a big boy!

He's oversized according to the breed standard just about. He's 57cm at the shoulders and when he's well muscled he hovers around 25kg, though he's usually a little under that. And that's me keeping him lean on purpose to spare his back.

[pagegirlintraining]

How is it already day 6 of this challenge? Feels like this week has flown by even quicker than usual. Anyway, for today’s drabble I went back to one of my favorite universes to write in, which is music school Wilmon. This is set a little ways after the events of “Of Enemies And Symphonies”.

”Det är redan bestämt. Vi hade en lagomröstning igår.”

Wille skrattar lite när han tittar på Simon och Simon gissar att han ser nog väldigt skeptisk ut. Men det här är ju ganska stort.

Det är Felice som bryter tystnaden. Hon lägger handen på Simons axel och ger den en klämning.

”Alltså, har du hört ditt röst? Självklart vill vi ha dig i bandet. Även om ni två ska bli skitjobbiga.”

”Hallå!” protesterar Wille, och nu är det Simon som skrattar åt sin pojkväns kränkt uttryck.

”Hon har rätt, älskling. Kanske borde vi verkligen försöker minska vår eyefucking på scenen.“

[garagedansdisco]

"Hans röst skär som en kniv, hans röst skär som en kniv, ingen sjunger blues som Jeffrey Lee / His voice cuts like a knife, his voice cuts like a knife, no one sings the blues like Jeffrey Lee" ~ Thåström - Ingen sjunger blues som Jeffrey Lee Pierce (x)