#pure philosophy
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Do I run over this liberal on our next patrol or do I drive around?
60 notes
·
View notes
Text
Gold is often connected to divinity in rl religions. In Buddhism, it indeed symbolizes enlightenment and such, and it is often kept pure in order to not ruin its brilliance. In Tibetan Buddhism, statues are gilded with it and the 5 tonne Golden Buddha statue in Thailand is composed of 18 karat gold, almost fully pure.
Within this world, I like to think that gold has caught the eye of the Anemons in a religious sense upon the (,,re/")discovery of the Void Sea. The golden waves of it shaped the perception of their world, from explaining the sun as coated in a layer of Void, to giving an idea of what "cleanliness of soul" should look like. Wheel Flowers are also attributed to the Void as sprouts of it, because of their ethereal gold coloration.
The feeling of the divine has however faded when the motivations behind handling of the Void went terribly south, replaced by the extremist corruption and greed of High castes.
In other words, I wanted an excuse to draw Euros as a šarkan/змей.
#rw#rain world#oc tag#rw ancients#looks to the moon#five pebbles#no significant harassment#oc: fish inside a birdcage#oc: abet zephyr#oc: boreas' blessing#oc: preacher#oc: three sparrows#oc: caper of euros#philosophy sessions au#my art#lilypad implied#since I'm considering Iterators more closely lately. defining what ''relationship'' even is is so ough..#the masks are essentially the same as those Tibetan statues. gilded. and golden leaf Is pure gold. 'Row says That cuz she's stupid-#-from religion stuff. doing my best to make her an unreliable narrator for things outside of her expertise.
159 notes
·
View notes
Text
From what I can see, all the commentary on the Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes movie thinks this story is trying to answer its philosopical questions, and completely overlooking the fact that all the answers these characters find are the wrong ones. The right answer is in The Hunger Games and Catching Fire and Mockingjay. You can tell because the main character of this story is the villain in the other ones.
#the ballad of songbirds and snakes#the hunger games#the first couple of reviews made me go like 'wow it must be so weird to approach this series from a non-christian viewpoint'#then the christian review was like 'this movie's philosophy's humanist and doesn't mention god'#and i'm like 'no kidding. i wonder if maybe the lack of god in this world is the point'#'and why these characters inhabit a world that will hold the hunger games for another sixty-five years'#'maybe there's another story to be told in this world about what happens when you look beyond that pure humanist viewpoint'#'maybe an entire trilogy'
725 notes
·
View notes
Text
With Nietzsche, everything is mask. [...] Nietzsche didn't believe in the unity of a self and didn't experience it. Subtle relations of power and of evaluation between different "selves" that conceal but also express other kinds of forces—forces of life, forces of thought—such is Nietzsche's conception, his way of living. ...His madness was his final mask. He had written: "And sometimes madness itself is the mask that hides a knowledge that is fatal and too sure." In fact, it is not. Rather, it makes the moment when the masks, no longer shifting and communicating, merge into a death-like rigidity. Among the strongest moments of Nietzsche's philosophy are the pages where he speaks of the need to be masked, of the virtue and the positivity of masks, of their ultimate importance.
Gilles Deleuze, Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life
366 notes
·
View notes
Text
biggest disconnect in pathologic's reception has kind of always been a divide between "patho is driven by mechanics" and "patho is driven by story" camps where opinions only ever come from one of these extremes... around p1's development and release the developers considered it exclusively a survival challenge sim, not a game marketed for its story (despite story representing a huge fraction of the time and thought put into it). In The Society Of Dead Poets goes into so much detail about this. and it WAS a stunning technical work under the circumstances, but the complex story was what gave the franchise cult appeal, or at least enough so for it to get a sequel... reviews from the period tend to go along the lines of "this game looks and plays like shit but it's extremely thought-provoking". there's a little to be said about the mainstream view of a "Gamer" in 2005 and what they would be interested in marketing-wise not tracking with story games yet; anyway, the one-dimensionality here was consistent with the studio's approach to games as a whole (cf BoneHouse.ppt).
so IPL's perception of their work was what informed p2's priorities, which turned out to be A Way Better Survival Challenge at the expense of things like characters having complex motivations (expansion on this has been omitted; iykyk), and they did an incredible job with that & basically perfected what they had been going for mechanically. which created this weird divide where p2 fans think 1 isn't worth playing because it's less engaging as a gaming experience, and p1 fans (me included, to be clear) see 2's story changes as a spit in the face of everything that made the series work. like, neither of these are fundamentally incorrect, but they refer to completely non-overlapping paradigms of engaging with the material. when hopefully it can be agreed that a Video Game is comprised of Both a narrative aspect and an interactive aspect, and that they need to work together to create the player's transformative experience (again, premise of BoneHouse.ppt).
Anyway. that helps explain a lot of hbomb's stance on the franchise, particularly that he can endorse patho2 without comment as an ostensibly leftist youtuber when even the most cursory playthrough is enough to let players in on its gleeful centering of ecofascism... that game's representation of colonial relations as an unfixable divide employing the racist trope of reciprocal violence, its obsession with maintaining status quo, and its completely tasteless approach to MMIW are all elements of Story and thus all secondary to p2's huge improvements on the survival system. in the same vein, his discussion of p1's changeling's route is limited to the constant reputation decrease and the repeated quests because those are the only mechanical features introduced over the previous routes, even while clararoute text is fundamental to understanding most characters... his video isn't like Bad for getting the interactive experience p1 would present to you, but it sucks for engaging with the story because it's not about the story. and unfortunately, on discussion posting websites, we do usually post about story
#pathologic#I'm so tired.#FAQ: BoneHouse was a presentation given by an IPL writer who will go unnamed here regarding his philosophy to gamedev. ItSODP was a lengthy#interview with the same (there's an EN translation on archive.org; BoneHouse is on the Files section of the archived IPL webpage).#genuinely I do really enjoy p2 as a survival sim and I think the most interesting things done with it (challenge runs) arise purely from#engaging with that half of the gameplay. but there is nothing to talk about w/o the plot it presents to you and that's why hbomb's video#falls so flat to me in applying that same approach to 1; a game fundamentally not balanced in a way that that's a fair take
130 notes
·
View notes
Text
style as a character is fascinating to me because he is simultaneously the character that is the most like his taming parallel while also being nothing like him at all. like when he’s with fadel and “taming” him, that is the most petruchio i’ve ever fucking seen in a modern adaptation. however he doesn’t have any of the same personal parallels to petruchio that makes him feel like petruchio in the same way that bison feels like bianca, fadel feels like katherine, and kant feels like lucentio.
which is interesting because objectively petruchio is like. fucking evil. despite being so much like him in his courting of fadel, style is not like petruchio beyond that and i think that’s honestly the only way they could keep the parallel as close as possible while still making him likable and making us want to root for fadel and style.
also! style is the only one that is technically not just a 1:1 with his original character. he’s petruchio, yes - but he’s also tranio, who is lucentio’s servant/friend. which i think is likely part of what makes him more likable and also so different from petruchio
#style adds a veeerrry interesting analysis element considering he’s multiple characters#also i cannot find the relation to his name and petruchio’s character which is also throwing me sjdjd#cause i can find one with all the others#bianca and bison are so close in the way you speak them#kant was a philosopher and lucentio shows an interest in philosophy#fadel and katherine mean pure#and petruchio means rock/stone and some people think he was named that to reference patriarchy#but it’s like what does style gotta do with all that#the heart killers#the taming of the shrew#style sattawat#petruchio#my analysis#mine
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
world where plato was right and marx came up with communism in a fit of divine madness instead of years of work
#this is about plato's belief in knowledge from divine madness being more pure than that#knowledge which was reached through philosophy#im p sure it was plato it might have been another contemporary greek philosopher
130 notes
·
View notes
Text
A few more starfield verticals from weeks past. Seeing Aceles in the wild was so cool
#I applied zero philosophy to the pathogen question and went with aceles purely on the off chance that they'd be a possible encounter#and I played disappointed for a good 30+ levels after that until suddenly one just appeared all majestic-like#lovely creature design. they're like turian sauropods#starfield#my shots
84 notes
·
View notes
Text
A friend and I were talking about it and we couldn't decide so obviously the next best thing was to leave it up to the spn website. Personally I think he would be some type of humanities major but this is early seasons Cas so maybe he'd try to go to med school and angeliclly cheat his way through or something.
I'm getting all the discs. of majors from google so yeah
Anthropology: study humanity, and they examine how linguistics, culture, biology and history shape human diversity
Philosophy: study of fundamental questions about the nature of reality, knowledge, and value
(BROAD) Religious Studies: an interdisciplinary field of study that examines religious and secular worldviews, rituals, ethics, and philosophies
History: (I can't find many good ones that aren't ai generated boooo) critically examining the connections between the past, present, and future, usually has a specific time period in mind/that is an interest
Pre-med: a program that ensures students take all the required classes needed to apply for medical school
If you had a specifc focus in mind for any of these or something else that would fit him feel free to comment or put it in the tags.
If pre-med wins I'll make another poll to determine what his medical discipline would be because I'm way too invested in this now lol.
#castiel#spn#supernatural#i personally think it would be anthropology or philosophy#purely because i see him being baffled by hot takes from centuries ago#and i think philosophy would give early seasons cas an existential crisis earlier on
13 notes
·
View notes
Quote
When I was looking for the key to open the deepest chamber of your heart, I found that secret key of pure love hidden in my heart.
Debasish Mridha
#quotes#Debasish Mridha#thepersonalwords#literature#life quotes#prose#lit#spilled ink#debasish-mridha#debasish-mridha-md#inspirational#looking-for-love#love-hidden-in-my-heart#philosophy#pure-love
20 notes
·
View notes
Note
no asks😔 imagine
-tfa-bee-and-c(imma just put bee from now on)
Yeah, I can imagine the wind that blows through your empty helm
45 notes
·
View notes
Note
What are some things cable likes about peter?
nathan's type:
red mask ✅ tight suit ✅ kind of stupid ✅ filters sadness through the prism of humour ✅
bonuses peter parker has to offer
cute hair ✅ cute butt ✅ cute everything ✅
#sci speaks#i think cable likes how upstanding peter is. like peter's just a good guy. he's such a good guy.#and i think. being able to read people's thoughts. nate probably doesn't know a lot of people as Good as peter.#like peter's good because he's kind of just... simple. he has simple wants and desires and he's not ever angling for anything.#peter's just so good. and i think nathan is definitely fond on him because of that.#i know i complain about this mindset that peter is pure of heart yadda yadda#I HATE that. i hate the trope where peter's like an angel who is pure of heart. he's not. but.#he's not deceptive or hungry for power or morally righteous or anything. he's just a guy. and that makes him better than most heroes.#i think that's something to admire peter for - that he doesn't let power go to his head and he's flawed but not in a superhuman sort of way#he's flawed in a human sort of way.#he doesn't make cosmic mistakes that effect the balance of the earth (well. he didn't.)#he makes small mistakes that effect his personal life and his relationships but he's trying so hard.#he's so. so small potatoes. and i'm sure nathan just. loves him. peter small potatoes parker.#admires a guy who's living his life like that. without cosmic worries or massive ambition. just a guy who wants to be happy.#i think it's funny how wade equates nate and peter in his head as similar because they're both 'heroes' or whatever#but nathan and peter have such polar opposing philosophies to life. polar opposing that they'd still probably admire and envy eachother for#peter envying nate because he's ambitious and powerful and has a freaking floating ISLAND or whatever#and nathan envying peter for being able to grant himself happiness.
87 notes
·
View notes
Text
#hi folks! it's time for#the waitmyturtles non-contextual philosophy corner#nicknamed “kant klub”#as promised from last week#a quick a priori lesson#kant posits the theory that humans can have knowledge without prior experience or exposure to a thing or an object#in this quote he clarifies that we can't automatically assume to know the characteristics of an object#but we might intuit what the purpose of an object is#i wonder if that's what humans experienced when they observed that a circular object could be a wheel for the first time#in any case#i'd like to note about this episode#that the entirety of this episode in my fast-forwarding it#could have been intuited through a posteriori experience#in other words#i already have knowledge about this episode through prior experience of jojo's previous work#BECAUSE I FELT LIKE I WAS WATCHING SANDRAY#but i'm jumping ahead of myself#a posteriori next week!#immanuel kant#emmanuel kant#critique of pure reason
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
But we shouldn't enclose life in the single moment when individual life confronts universal death. A life is everywhere, in all the moments that a given living subject goes through and that are measured by given lived objects: an immanent life carrying with it the events or singularities that are merely actualized in subjects and objects. This indefinite life does not itself have moments, close as they may be one to another, but only between-times, between-moments; it doesn't just come about or come after but offers the immensity of an empty time where one sees the event yet to come and already happened, in the absolute of an immediate consciousness.
Gilles Deleuze, Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life
89 notes
·
View notes
Note
You can ignore this if you haven’t read it but is “Must we burn Sade?” By Simone de Beauvoir a decent read ?
I’ve heard it’s basically a defence/criticism(?) for Sade’s writings . Haha I don’t know the proper word to use for it .
I’m asking you since you seem very knowledgeable on de Sade and assume you read books revolving around him .
I would definitely recommend it if you're interested in how Sade's image has changed throughout the years. The 20th century saw a huge recontextualizing of his philosophy, especially in the European surrealist and existentialist circles. Simone de Beauvoir argued that Sade had been unjustly maligned/dismissed as a philosopher and redefines him as a moralist and feminist figure. ...Of course it should also be mentioned that several of the midcentury philosophers and artists defending Sade, like Beauvoir, were defendants of the abusive aspects of his philosophy as well (Beauvoir and Sartre were twice accused of grooming Beauvoir's students into sexual relationships with them).
If you follow me, you can probably tell I don't fully agree with her appraisal of Sade, but it's still a super fascinating essay, and there's still a lot of valuable analysis in it. Even just for historical/philosophical interest. I'd also recommend Angela Carter's Sadean Woman for a more modern feminist reading of Sade. And Laurence L. Bongie's biographical essay for the complete opposite lol (he argues Sade is NOT deserving of the praise he got during the 20th century, and is an overall mediocre philosopher and writer). Honestly any Sade analysis is a good read in my opinion, regardless if I agree or not.
#I just love analysis of Sade's work cuz it yeilds so many different interpretations#It's just... he said so much batshit stuff and with the pure intent to shock and horrify;#that it calls into the legitimacy of anything he says. Including his at times seemingly modern views#There are moments in his writing where Sade seems to be earning himself a place in early queer theory or feminist thought#but then you flip the page and he says something so outlandish that it's obvious hes joking#So was it all a joke? Or is he being sincere about all of it? If hes fully sincere; does that discredit the previous insights#in a 'broken clock is right twice a day' way?#Or is it mixed sincerity and satire? Then how can anything he say be taken seriously?#How much should we factor in his life to his philosophy? He certainly didn't always practice what he (seemingly) preached#but neither did many philosophers; neither did many of his contemporaries#theres just a lot of ways to read Sade I guess#ask#anon ask
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
k the thing abt streaming music is it turns my listening experience into money in someone's pockets and i just think thats kinda fucked up
#its like capitalism is watching you with its big glass eyes#theyre so shiny and transparent#shitpost#philosophy#memes#thoughts#writing#sadg#sadgirl#music#new halsey albums great but like capitalism makes me sad#like i cant engage with artwork without being weirdly parasocial#idk theres a power imbalance#im overthinking it#but thats why i like records because you can listen for pure enjoyment#without that experience being weirdly taxed or comodified or monotozed
7 notes
·
View notes