#prophet malachi
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
biblebloodhound · 2 months ago
Text
The Day Is Coming (Malachi 4:1-6)
All of us need to allow accountability into our lives, so that we may continue in living good and responsible lives.
The Great Day of His Wrath, by John Martin, c.1851 “Surely the day is coming; it will burn like a furnace. All the arrogant and every evildoer will be stubble, and the day that is coming will set them on fire,” says the Lord Almighty. “Not a root or a branch will be left to them. But for you who revere my name, the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its rays. And you will go out and…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
geekpreacher217 · 1 month ago
Text
One Last Word - Malachi 4
The Old Testament closes with a word concerning “the great and awesome day of the Lord.” Though the language of Malachi could be applied to the final day, it also pointed to a day that would be heralded by the “coming of Elijah,” a day which came when John came forth preaching to “repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.”  Just as the Jews lived in anticipation for the Messiah’s Kingdom, so…
0 notes
heartofashepherd · 7 months ago
Video
youtube
The End is Merely the Beginning (Malachi 1-4) - Hillsdale Auditorium Bib...
0 notes
dwellinginscripture · 8 months ago
Text
MALACHI 1: God Doth Love You
MALACHI 1: GOD DOTH LOVE YOU  MALACHI 1  In the beginning, the author Malachi lets us know who this message is from and who it’s to.  Malachi opens his book by letting us know that what follows is a proclamation of YHWH. The message of this final Old Testament book is addressed to “Israel.”  This name helps us understand that these words were for all covenant people belonging to God.  All God’s…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Malachi
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
idolysa · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
†⃨⃰‧̍̊ ◟ ͜ ͜ ͜ ◞ Prophet / Priest Inspired SNPTs。
Tumblr media Tumblr media
⛪️ 、System Names ; Words/(Wo)Men of God, Divine belief Collective, Godly sun rays, God’s (true) Will, (The) Devoted followers, Chanted Prayers, (A/The) Church’s Prayer.
Tumblr media
📿 、Names ; Saint, Ezekiel, Isaiah, Abraham, Sarah, Malachi, Basil, Mila/Meela, Joshua, Ben, Praysia, Michael.
Please research the Origins of these names before using them.
Tumblr media
🔔 、Pronouns ; Pra/Pray, Voi/Voice, Whisp/Whisper, God/Godly, Emb/Embrace, Chur/Church, Cho/Choir, Devo/Devoted or Devotee, Prea/Preach, Bib/Biblical, Mor/Mortal, illu/illusion, Belief/Believe.
Tumblr media
🕊️ 、Titles ; The voice of God, Prn’s divine chanting (of Prayers), The Man-made God, God’s Hearsay, Prn with Belief in the Divine, The godly Rumor, God’s mortal Messenger.
Tumblr media
411 notes · View notes
hdslibrary · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Off with his Head
We recently hosted a class session where students explored English bibles and their illustrations. One image in particular was reproduced in a multitude of variations: the heroine Judith slaying enemy general, Holofernes. Depictions of this scene from the book of Judith have been popular for many centuries, with varying levels of gruesomeness.
This image, from an 18th century narrative version of the bible features a calm and smiling Judith handing the head to her equally unbothered maid, while the neck of Holofernes gushes gore.
Clarke, Laurence. A Compleat history of the holy Bible, contained in the Old and New Testament : in which are inserted the occurrences that happened during the space of four hundred years, from the days of the prophet Malachi to the birth of our blessed Saviour ... London : Printed for the author ... , 1739-1740.
94 notes · View notes
hyperpotamianarch · 2 months ago
Note
Secular jew here with a really stupid question about the tanach
What exactly constitutes the tanach? I think I've heard it's an acronym, so would the Torah be the t? what's the rest of the acronym? Which writings does it include? I'm pretty sure the talmud isn't part of it, what else isn't? Apologies if this is too basic of a question for you!
Hello! Thank you for the question!
The Torah indeed is the first part of the Tanach. Tanach is an acronym for the Hebrew words Torah, Nevi'im and Ketuvim. Roughly translated, those titles mean "Instructions", "Prophets" and "Writings", respectively. The Tanach, then, consists of 24 books divided into those three categories.
The Torah is the easiest one to define: it's the Pentateuch, the Five Books of Moses, however else you choose to call them, and they are generally known to be set apart. The books in it are Bereshit (Genesis), Shemot (Exodus), Vayikra (Leviticus), B'midbar (Numbers) and Devarim (Deuteronomy). Those are the books traditionally given to Moshe directly by G-d, and mostly focus on the formation of the Israelite people and its time under his leadership. It also includes all the commandments, basically.
Nevi'im are supposedly the books written by prophets, and half the books there are specifically books of prophecy (which is more messages from G-d than necessarily predicting the future). However, the first four books - Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings - are more historical in nature, chronicling the events from Moshe's death to the destruction of the 1st Temple. The last four books - Isaiah, Jeremaiah, Ezkiel and the Twelve prophets - are primarily books of prophecies and visions, with some stories sprinked in between. Most of them are concurrent with events in the book of Kings - except for the last three of the Twelve Prophets, who have lived around the building of the 2nd Temple. The Twelve Prophets are (by this order): Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Michah, Naḥum, Ḥabakuk, Zephaniah, Ḥaggai, Zacharias and Malachi. Names are written more or less in their traditional English spelling.
Then we get to the Ketuvim, Written texts, which are... a little more vague. It's hard to say if there's a uniting theme. A couple are books of parables and songs are there, yet others are more chronicles of events, either ones that occured after the time of the book of Kings, before it or concurrently with it. A common assumption is that the difference between those and the Nevi'im is the level of prophecy in writing them - where the Nevi'im were written under direct prophecies, while the Ketuvim were only written in Ruach HaKodesh (roughly translated as "the holy spirit", but I don't want to cause any confusion with Christianity). Either way, the books in the Ketuvim are, in order: Tehilim (Psalms), Mishley (Proverbs), 'Iyov (Job), Shir HaShirim (the Song o Songs/the Songs of Solomon), Rut (or Ruth), Eichah (Lamentations), Kohellet (Ecclesiastes), Ester (or Esther), Daniel, Ezra (and Neḥemiah) and Divrey HaYamim (Chronicles).
If you count, you'll find there are 5 books in the Torah, 8 in the Nevi'im and 11 in the Ketuvim - 24 in total. Ther Twelve Prophets, known as Trei Asar (which just means twelve), are considered one book, The division of Samuel, Kings, Ezra and Chronicles into two books each is relatively late and only makes sense in Ezra due to the obvious PoV shift. Which kind of reminds me, maybe a brief explanation is required as to what each of those last 11 books is.
Tehilim is a book of prayers and religious poems, traditionally written by King David (though they were probably collected long after his time). Mishley is the proverbs of king Shelomo (Solomon), some of which were definitely written long after his time (as in, it's directly stated inside the book). 'Iyov is possibly a parable, possibly a real story which serves as a background to a conversation on the problem of evil that doesn't seem to be solved within the book. The five books from Shir HaShirim to Esther are considered the Five Scrolls, but actually share very little in common: Shir HaShirim is a love song that sometimes become rather erotic, written by King Solomon. Ruth is an origin story to King David's family that occurs during the Judges period, and is about his Great-Grandmother and her conversion to Judaism (she was from Moab, which was a neighboring nation). Eichah is a book lamenting the destruction of the 1st Temple and of the Kingdom of Judea, traditionally written by Jeremiah. Kohellet is a philosophical book pondering the meaning of life - it either finds none or finds solace in faith, depending who you ask - also said to have been written by King Solomon. Esther is famously about the first organised Pogrom in recorded history - one against the Jews of the Persian empire, occuring during the Babylonian exile in Persia. Daniel is about the vision of a Jewish slave in the court of Nebuchadnezzar, who somehow succeeds to stay in a position of power after multiple switches in the government. The story of Daniel isn't half as interesting as his weird visions, though. Ezra is about the rebuilding of the Temple and Jerusalem after the return from exile, more or less - Ezra and Neḥemiah are the major leaders of this time period. This is pretty much a chronicling book - as is the last one, appropriately called Chronicles (Divrey HaYamim). That one basically attempts to sum up everything that happened to the Jewish people throughout history until the building of the 2nd Temple.
I've already written a lot and am too tired to explain why those books were codified and others weren't, so I'll just leave it at that for now.
31 notes · View notes
walkswithmyfather · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
“Jesus in the Old Testament” By Bible Love Notes:
“Don't miss the wonderful list that shows how God was "whispering" about Jesus in every Old Testament book!”
“After His resurrection, Jesus met two disciples walking to a village called Emmaus (Luke 24:13-35). They didn't recognize Jesus, but "beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself" (Luke 24:27).
Christ's redemption was part of God's plan from the beginning (Genesis 3:15). When we recognize this important truth, it enhances our understanding and appreciation of both Old and New Testaments.
Enjoy this list of "whispers" (clues, foreshadowings) that God placed in each Old Testament book, preparing us for the coming of Jesus.
In Genesis Jesus is the Seed of the Woman
Exodus…………………...Our Passover Lamb
Leviticus……………………..Our High Priest
Numbers........Guiding Pillar of Fire and Cloud
Deuteronomy……….The Prophet Like Moses
Joshua………………..The Mighty Conqueror
Judges…...…....………....…...Our Rescuer
Ruth………………...Our Kinsman Redeemer
1 & 2 Samuel……......…..The Seed of David
Kings & Chronicles…….....….Our Mighty King
Ezra & Nehemiah…..Re-builder of Our Broken Walls
Esther………………….....Our Way of Escape
Job……………...Our Hope in Times of Trouble
Psalms…………..…..Our Shepherd and Sacrifice
Proverbs & Ecclesiastes…….…..Our Wisdom
Song of Solomon…Our Lover and Bridegroom
Isaiah…………………...Our Suffering Savior
Jeremiah……………....The Righteous Branch
Lamentations…..…Prophet Who Weeps for Us
Ezekiel………..The Watchman Who Warns Us
Daniel……..The 4th Man in the Fiery Furnace
Hosea………………….Our Faithful Husband
Joel…............Our Baptizer in the Holy Spirit
Amos……………………..Our Burden Bearer
Obadiah……………..The One Mighty to Save
Jonah…………....The Sender of Missionaries
Micah……..The Messenger of the Good News
Nahum………..The Avenger of the Righteous
Habakkuk……....The One Crying for Revival
Zephaniah & Haggai….Giver of Another Chance
Zechariah…….…………...The Pierced Son
Malachi.........Sun of Righteousness w/ Healing in His Wings
As you read through the Bible, remember that you are reading the greatest story ever written—the story of mankind's inexcusable fall and God's Unreasonable Love.
💙💙💙
I did not create this list. I compiled and edited it from various non-copyrighted lists.”
There are a lot of links to devotions on this webpage. Check them out!
25 notes · View notes
pharmaciacatholica · 1 month ago
Note
The Bible is not a historical (compilation of) book(s), it's a theological book. There are some things that cannot be taken literally. They should be read theologically, spiritually.
While reading it, you can see that there are parts that have historical inaccuracies in the Old Testament, I mean, they don't match with other historical events, small details like the names of emeprors. There are things that don't exactly agree within the different books of the Old Testament.
Don't get me wrong. I know and believe God created everything that exists, but there's a reason why the Catholic priest Georges Lamaître made the Big Bang theory, and why the Catholic friar Gregor Mendel made the laws of genetics. Is there something I'm not getting?
Yes, there is a lot you are not getting. Especially based on the follow up ask you sent me while I was getting ready to respond to this.
The Bible is not a historical (compilation of) book(s), it's a theological book.
The Sacred Scriptures are a compilation of book of various genres. The Old Testament consists of forty-six books. Twenty-one historical books, containing the account of the creation of the universe and the history of the patriarchs and the Jewish nation. Seven didactic books, containing collections of psalms, wise sayings, and rules of life. Eighteen prophetical books, containing prophecies as well as instructions or admonitions.
The Historical texts are: the five books of Moses, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, the four books of Kings, the two Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Tobit, Judith, Esther, the two books of the Maccabees.
The didactic texts are: Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom, Sirach.
The prophetic texts are: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Baruch, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Johan, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi.
We get these groupings from the collective writings of the Church Fathers and the Tradition (capital T). (x)
here are some things that cannot be taken literally. They should be read theologically, spiritually.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what the literal sense of Scripture is. The Catechism summarizes the Church's teaching on the different senses of Scripture in paragraphs 115-119:
115 According to an ancient tradition, one can distinguish between two senses of Scripture: the literal and the spiritual, the latter being subdivided into the allegorical, moral and anagogical senses. The profound concordance of the four senses guarantees all its richness to the living reading of Scripture in the Church.
116 The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation: "All other senses of Sacred Scripture are based on the literal." (x)
117 The spiritual sense. Thanks to the unity of God's plan, not only the text of Scripture but also the realities and events about which it speaks can be signs.
The allegorical sense. We can acquire a more profound understanding of events by recognizing their significance in Christ; thus the crossing of the Red Sea is a sign or type of Christ's victory and also of Christian Baptism.
The moral sense. The events reported in Scripture ought to lead us to act justly. As St. Paul says, they were written "for our instruction".
The anagogical sense (Greek: anagoge, "leading"). We can view realities and events in terms of their eternal significance, leading us toward our true homeland: thus the Church on earth is a sign of the heavenly Jerusalem.
118 A medieval couplet summarizes the significance of the four senses: The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith; The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.
119 It is the task of exegetes to work, according to these rules, towards a better understanding and explanation of the meaning of Sacred Scripture in order that their research may help the Church to form a firmer judgement. For, of course, all that has been said about the manner of interpreting Scripture is ultimately subject to the judgement of the Church which exercises the divinely conferred commission and ministry of watching over and interpreting the Word of God.
The entirety of Holy Writ is to be taken literally. Not all of the books are meant to be taken as historical. This I have shown, and it does not contradict.
While reading it, you can see that there are parts that have historical inaccuracies in the Old Testament, I mean, they don't match with other historical events, small details like the names of emeprors. There are things that don't exactly agree within the different books of the Old Testament.
I do not have the time to go through and scrounge up all of the answers to any supposed contradictions contained within the Old Testament, at least not right now (typing this at 1 am). I think it is sufficient to point out that, as a Catholic, you are bound under pain of mortal sin to believe in Scriptural inerrancy with divine and catholic faith.
From Pope Leo XIII:
"So far is it from being possible that any error can co-exist with inspiration, that inspiration not only is essentially incompatible with error, but excludes and rejects it as absolutely and necessarily as it is impossible that God Himself, the supreme Truth, can utter that which is not true. This is the ancient and unchanging faith of the Church."
Providentissimus Deus
Reiterated by Pope Pius XII:
“For as the substantial Word of God became like to men in all things, ‘except sin,’ so the words of God, expressed in human language, are made like to human speech in every respect, except error”
Divino Afflante Spiritu
From the Second Vatican Council:
"Since, therefore, all that the inspired authors, or sacred writers, affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully and without error, teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the sacred Scriptures."
Dei Verbum
There is much much more but I believe I've made my point on this matter. Next...
Don't get me wrong. I know and believe God created everything that exists
Nice, we agree!
but there's a reason why the Catholic priest Georges Lamaître made the Big Bang theory
I don't really understand the point here. I have known of Father Lamaitre and him being the "inventor" of the big bang theory for a while but I have never read it. Regardless, he is held to the same scrutiny and standard as everyone else is by both what I have already here laid out and what Pope Pius XII lays out in Humani Generis. I cannot say if he does or not, I have not read it, but a singular priest is not really an authority. This is especially true in the realm of the physical sciences.
and why the Catholic friar Gregor Mendel made the laws of genetics
Same principle as before regarding the authority of an individual priest that is not Your (royal you) pastor. I am also not familiar with this particular work, but I don't see a contradiction with the Faith at all on its face. I believe in genetics. I don't think you understand what macroevolution is as a concept.
17 notes · View notes
biblebloodhound · 2 months ago
Text
The Righteous and the Wicked (Malachi 3:13-18)
A typical tactic of wicked persons is to blame others.
“You have spoken arrogantly against me,” says the Lord. “Yet you ask, ‘What have we said against you?’ “You have said, ‘It is futile to serve God. What do we gain by carrying out his requirements and going about like mourners before the Lord Almighty? But now we call the arrogant blessed. Certainly evildoers prosper, and even when they put God to the test, they get away with it.’” Then those…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
geekpreacher217 · 2 months ago
Text
Our God Is - Malachi 1
Hello everyone.  Due to some technical issues at the Internet Archive, where these audio files are usually hosted, I have not been able to upload in recent weeks.  Please be patient as I try to get caught up with uploading this audio a few lessons at a time. This lesson is from November 17, 2024
0 notes
heartofashepherd · 7 months ago
Video
youtube
Have You Offered the LORD Your Best? (Malachi 1) - A daily Bible study f...
0 notes
lightfromthelighthouse · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
Good Afternoon!
For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. Malachi 3:6
Most, if not all, reading this have known people whose personality seems to change with the time. You are not sure which person you are going to see each time you meet them. Will they be pleasant, or will they be gruff? Will they be willing to help or will they refuse?
God, through the prophet Malachi, let the Israelites know they would not have to guess at what he expected from them, nor what they could expect from him. He was very clear in letting them know that his expectations and love for them had not changed despite their continual disobedience.  They could trust his word to them, good or bad. 
God is not like a restaurant menu, "subject to change". In Him, we find consistency and stability. He was faithful, is faithful, and will ever be faithful!
16 notes · View notes
mybeautifulchristianjourney · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
A Prayer for Restoration
Turn us back, O Jehovah, to thee, and we shall be turned; renew our days as of old. — Lamentations 5:21 | Smith's Literal Translation (SMITH) The Holy Bible Containing the Old and New Testaments; Translated Literally From The Original Tongues by Julia E. Smith. Cross References: Psalm 80:3; Isaiah 56:6-7; Jeremiah 31:18-19; Hosea 14:1-2; Joel 2:12-13; Zechariah 1:3; Malachi 3:7
Read full chapter
Thoughts on Today's Verse When these words were first spoken, the prophet and his people were focused on God's restoration of Israel back to their place in Judea, their prominence in the world of nations, their beauty in daily life, and their worship and security in the Temple of the Lord. From our vantage point, this prayer can be our prayer as well. Restoration can mean Christ's return, which brings us home to God. On that day, every barrier standing between God and us will fall. Our mortality will be swallowed up in victory. We will see God face to face and walk with him in the cool of the day as his perfect children. Maranatha — O Lord come (1 Corinthians 16:22-24 NRSV). And may that day come soon!
The Thoughts on Today's Verse are written by Phil Ware.
15 notes · View notes
eesirachs · 1 year ago
Text
the prophetic body is not allowed to die. it is hardly allowed to stop prophesying. elijah leaves no corpse. elisha leaves all corpse: his bones continue divine intervention well after their rotting. hosea is a prophet and then he isn't: we know without ever really knowing that he dies brutally, in the siege of a city that never loved him and won't write him down amongst the casualties. malachi dies young. how young? from what? maybe it's not that god doesn't know but that god doesn't care. there is no deceased prophetic body. if anything, there are once-prophets autopsied by a god overcome by yet another commission for them. and i mean really, what is the autopsying of a prophet's corpse if not a continuation of his ministry?
74 notes · View notes