#probation gps ankle bracelet

[huatenglobal]

#HUATENGLOBAL 2024 new arrival 4G lte gps ankle bracelet C40 for parolees, prisoner, offender, criminal, dementia, etc 4,000mAh tamper-proof smart bracelet with free tracking system and open API

[mordorintelligencemarketresearch]

The Growing Electronic Offender Monitoring Solutions Market: Trends, Drivers, and Future Outlook

Market Overview

The Electronic Offender Monitoring Solutions market is projected to grow from USD 2.02 billion in 2024 to USD 2.96 billion by 2029, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.91% during the forecast period (2024-2029).

Electronic Offender Monitoring Solutions (EOMS) encompass a range of technologies used to track and monitor individuals who are serving their sentences outside of prison, typically under parole, probation, or house arrest. These solutions use GPS, RFID, and electronic bracelets or ankle tags to provide real-time tracking and location data of offenders. The technology is designed to help authorities ensure that individuals comply with court-mandated conditions and rules while also safeguarding the community.

Some of the most common solutions include:

GPS Tracking: Real-time location tracking, ensuring offenders remain within predefined geographic areas or curfews.

Alcohol Monitoring: Monitoring devices that detect alcohol consumption, often used for offenders with alcohol-related offenses.

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID): Used for proximity detection, such as ensuring offenders are at their homes or specific locations at designated times.

Remote Monitoring: Technologies allowing officers or authorities to track offenders remotely, reducing the need for constant physical monitoring.

Key Drivers of Market Growth

Increasing Demand for Cost-Effective Alternatives to Incarceration: One of the primary factors driving the growth of electronic offender monitoring solutions is the need for cost-effective alternatives to traditional incarceration. Maintaining prisons and correctional facilities is costly, and electronic monitoring provides a more affordable solution for monitoring offenders in the community. This is particularly relevant as governments face budget constraints while striving to reduce prison overcrowding.

Government and Legal Reforms: Many countries are moving toward sentencing reforms that focus on rehabilitation and reducing recidivism. Electronic monitoring enables offenders to continue their rehabilitation process in the community, allowing them to maintain family ties, employment, and other social connections. The widespread acceptance of such technologies, along with the implementation of laws encouraging non-incarceration penalties, is boosting the market.

Technological Advancements: The growing capabilities of monitoring technologies are also contributing to the market’s expansion. Innovations in GPS tracking, enhanced data analytics, and real-time reporting are making electronic monitoring solutions more reliable and efficient. Improved battery life, waterproof features, and less intrusive devices are also increasing the adoption of these solutions, making them more convenient and acceptable for both authorities and offenders.

Reducing Recidivism: Studies have shown that electronic offender monitoring can play a significant role in reducing recidivism. By monitoring offenders in real time, authorities can intervene early when potential violations or crimes are detected, reducing the likelihood of repeat offenses. This contributes to overall public safety and helps offenders stay on the path to reintegration into society.

Increased Focus on Rehabilitation and Reintegration: Modern justice systems increasingly focus on rehabilitation over punishment, which creates a fertile ground for electronic monitoring solutions. Programs designed to reintegrate offenders back into society are enhanced by the use of these technologies, which enable constant oversight while offering flexibility to offenders.

Regional Insights: North America and Europe Lead the Way

In terms of regional market performance, North America and Europe are expected to lead the industry due to high adoption rates, strong infrastructure, and regulatory support. The United States, in particular, has been at the forefront of adopting electronic offender monitoring technologies, with widespread use in parole and probation systems.

In Europe, countries like the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands have implemented electronic monitoring as part of broader criminal justice reforms. The region’s strong focus on human rights, rehabilitation, and reducing prison overcrowding has made electronic monitoring a key component of the justice system.

Asia-Pacific is also witnessing rapid growth in the electronic offender monitoring market, driven by improving criminal justice systems, rising investments in public safety technologies, and the adoption of alternative sentencing programs in countries like India, China, and Japan.

Challenges in the Electronic Offender Monitoring Solutions Market

Despite the significant growth prospects, there are challenges within the industry. Concerns about privacy, data security, and the potential for misuse of information are primary barriers. The effectiveness of electronic monitoring systems can also be compromised by issues such as device tampering, interference, or geographical restrictions in remote areas where GPS signals are weak.

Additionally, public perception of these technologies can vary, with some individuals questioning the ethics of tracking offenders or feeling uncomfortable with the data collection involved. This requires careful consideration and regulatory oversight to balance the need for public safety with individual rights.

The Future of the Electronic Offender Monitoring Solutions Industry

The future of the electronic offender monitoring solutions market is bright, with increasing investments in technology and expanding global adoption. The market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of [insert projected CAGR based on market research], as more governments and law enforcement agencies turn to these technologies to address overcrowding in prisons, reduce crime rates, and offer offenders a chance to reintegrate into society.

Key trends to watch include:

Integration with AI and Machine Learning: The use of artificial intelligence to predict behavior and track offenders’ activities more effectively.

Blockchain for Data Security: Implementing blockchain technology to ensure transparency, accuracy, and security of monitoring data.

Increased Use of Wearables: The development of more advanced and comfortable wearable devices that ensure higher compliance rates among offenders.

Conclusion

The electronic offender monitoring solutions industry is undergoing rapid growth as technological advancements, cost considerations, and a global focus on rehabilitation drive demand. As governments seek to improve public safety and reduce incarceration rates, electronic monitoring is emerging as an essential tool for transforming criminal justice systems worldwide. With continuous improvements in technology and a growing acceptance of these solutions, the market is set for long-term expansion.

For a detailed overview and more insights, you can refer to the full market research report by Mordor Intelligence

[michaelbradleyattorney]

Life Beyond Incarceration: Navigating Probation and Parole

In the complex web of the criminal justice system, the concepts of probation and parole are pivotal for reintegrating offenders back into society, yet they are often misunderstood. This article delves into the intricacies of probation and parole, highlighting their roles, differences, and challenges. It aims to provide a clearer understanding of these mechanisms as they operate beyond the confines of prison bars.

Defining Probation and Parole

Probation and parole are both alternatives to incarceration but serve at different stages of the criminal justice process. Probation is a court-ordered period of supervision in the community, given instead of a prison sentence or following a short jail term. It often comes with conditions that restrict the offender's behavior in the interest of public safety and rehabilitation. Parole, on the other hand, is granted after the offender has served part of their prison sentence, based on factors like good behavior, the nature of the offense, and the perceived likelihood of reintegrating into society.

Purpose and Goals

The primary goal of both probation and parole is to rehabilitate offenders and prevent future crimes, thus reducing the overall crime rate and easing the burden on overpopulated prison systems. They are vital for helping individuals rebuild their lives, providing them with support structures that were perhaps absent prior to their incarceration.

Conditions and Supervision

Those on probation or parole are required to comply with specific conditions, failing which they may be sent back to prison. Standard stipulations include meeting regularly with a probation officer, maintaining employment, residing at an approved location, not associating with other criminals, and abstaining from illegal substances. Some may be required to undergo regular drug testing, attend counseling, or participate in community service. The strictness of these conditions often depends on the original crime and the individual’s past criminal history.

Differences Between Probation and Parole

While both terms often appear interchangeably, significant differences exist:

Probation is part of the initial sentencing, avoiding prison altogether or reducing the time spent in jail. It's decided by a judge at sentencing.

Parole is granted after one has served time, with decisions made by a parole board that assesses the inmate’s behavior and rehabilitation progress while incarcerated.

The Role of Probation and Parole Officers

Probation and parole officers play a critical role in this system. They supervise offenders in the community, help them access rehabilitation services, and ensure they adhere to the conditions of their release. The officers are part enforcement and part counselor, often providing the first line of support in helping reintegrate individuals into society.

Challenges Faced by Offenders

Reentry into society can be daunting for individuals on probation or parole. They often encounter difficulties such as finding employment, securing housing, and rebuilding relationships with family and friends. The stigma of a criminal record adds significant barriers, sometimes leading to social isolation and economic instability, which can increase the risk of recidivism.

Technological Advances in Monitoring

Technological advancements have introduced new methods of monitoring and supporting offenders on probation and parole. Electronic monitoring, GPS ankle bracelets, and mobile apps help keep track of the individual's movements and activities, ensuring they comply with geographic restrictions and curfews.

The Impact of Probation and Parole on Society

Probation and parole systems significantly impact society by allowing offenders to serve time outside of prison cells, thereby reducing the cost burden on the state and mitigating the social consequences of mass incarceration. However, for these systems to be effective, they must be part of a broader strategy that includes education, vocational training, and mental health support.

The Future of Probation and Parole

As society evolves, so too does the approach to probation and parole. There is a growing recognition of the need for more humane and effective methods of criminal rehabilitation that support rather than punish. Future reforms may include more personalized rehabilitation programs, increased support services, and policies aimed at reducing the stigma that follows former offenders.

Probation and parole are essential yet complex parts of the criminal justice system, providing critical pathways back into society for those who have served their time. Understanding these concepts is essential to fostering more effective rehabilitation and integration strategies, as well as reducing recidivism and helping individuals lead productive lives post-incarceration. As we continue to navigate these mechanisms, it is vital to balance enforcement with empathy, ensuring that justice serves not just as punishment but as a platform for genuine change.

[everythingsyouneedtoknow]

How do electronic monitoring devices for prisoners balance security with human rights?

Electronic monitoring devices for prisoners and offenders are a testament to the evolving landscape of criminal justice, aiming to strike a balance between ensuring public safety and upholding the human rights of those being monitored. These devices, which track the movements and activities of individuals under house arrest or probation, are designed with the dual purpose of preventing recidivism and facilitating rehabilitation in a manner that respects individual freedoms and dignity.

The core of balancing security with human rights lies in the use of technology that is both effective in monitoring and minimally intrusive. GPS ankle bracelets, for example, allow for real-time location tracking, enabling authorities to ensure that individuals comply with their movement restrictions without necessitating physical confinement. This approach not only reduces the strain on prison systems but also allows individuals to maintain employment, family connections, and access to rehabilitative services, crucial factors in reducing the likelihood of reoffending.

Moreover, modern electronic monitoring systems incorporate features designed to respect privacy and dignity. Data encryption and strict access controls ensure that sensitive information is only available to authorized personnel. Additionally, the design of the devices themselves focuses on being discreet and comfortable to wear, minimizing the stigma associated with their use.

Transparency in the use of electronic monitoring and clear communication with the monitored individuals about their rights and obligations also play a critical role in upholding human rights. It's essential that those under monitoring understand the extent of the surveillance, the reasons behind it, and their rights to appeal or question the monitoring conditions.

Laipac is at the forefront of developing electronic monitoring solutions that carefully consider the balance between security needs and human rights. Our devices are designed with the highest standards of ethics and compliance in mind, ensuring that monitoring is both effective and respectful. To learn more about our commitment to advancing electronic monitoring technology in a humane and responsible manner, visit Laipac's Electronic Monitoring for House Arrest.

[amsgpsdaily]

http://ams-gps.com

The Benefits of Ankle Bracelet GPS Monitoring

In recent years, ankle bracelet GPS monitoring has gained significant popularity as a valuable tool in law enforcement and criminal justice systems. This innovative technology allows authorities to track and monitor individuals who are subject to house arrest, probation, or parole by using a GPS-enabled ankle bracelet. While some people may view ankle bracelet GPS monitoring as intrusive, there are several compelling reasons why it can be considered beneficial for both offenders and society as a whole.

1. Enhanced Public Safety:

Ankle bracelet GPS monitoring plays a crucial role in enhancing public safety. By tracking the movements of individuals under supervision, authorities can ensure that they are abiding by the terms of their sentence or supervision. This enables law enforcement agencies to monitor the whereabouts of high-risk offenders, preventing them from entering restricted areas or potentially dangerous zones. As a result, the technology acts as a deterrent, reducing the likelihood of re-offending and contributing to the overall safety of communities.

2. Alternative to Incarceration:

Ankle bracelet GPS monitoring provides an effective alternative to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders. By allowing offenders to serve their sentence in the comfort of their own homes, the technology helps alleviate the burden on overcrowded prisons and reduces the associated costs. This alternative approach also allows offenders to maintain their employment, support their families, and receive necessary treatment or counseling, facilitating their successful reintegration into society.

3. Increased Accountability and Compliance:

The use of ankle bracelet GPS monitoring promotes increased accountability and compliance among individuals under supervision. Knowing that their movements are being monitored, offenders are more likely to adhere to the conditions of their release or probation. This heightened level of accountability encourages responsible behavior, helps individuals maintain their commitments, and reduces the chances of engaging in criminal activities. Consequently, ankle bracelet GPS monitoring can contribute to the successful rehabilitation and reformation of offenders.

4. Quick Response to Violations:

Ankle bracelet GPS monitoring provides real-time tracking, enabling prompt response to any violations or breaches of conditions. If an individual deviates from their permitted zones or violates curfew restrictions, authorities can quickly address the situation. Timely intervention can prevent potential harm to the individual, victims, or the community at large. The ability to swiftly respond to violations ensures that appropriate actions are taken, such as providing warnings, adjusting conditions, or, if necessary, revoking probation or parole.

Ankle bracelet GPS monitoring, despite initial reservations, has proven to be a valuable tool in the criminal justice system. By enhancing public safety, providing an alternative to incarceration, promoting accountability, and enabling swift response to violations, this technology offers numerous benefits for both offenders and society as a whole. While it is essential to strike a balance between individual rights and societal needs, ankle bracelet GPS monitoring represents a significant step forward in the pursuit of a safer and more rehabilitative justice system.

[hereandeverywhere]

I love seeing ski school on the mountain with all the little groms in their oversized pinneys, unicorn helmet covers, and temper tantrums for cocoa or who knows what. I imagine those kids as little gangsters, tagged with a GPS ankle bracelet as if on probation, running the hill towards anarchy one gaper gap at a time. I feel for the parents pleading the case of “but you love skiing/snowboarding!” to the irrational tyrant with cocoa and gummy bear promises. (Bless your efforts!) . I’ve been thinking of a single line ski school print for awhile now… but as someone without kids I feel like I may do well with some lived examples. So… those with kids who try their patience on the hill, will you send me photos of your little bundle of joy tearing it up (or losing their mind) on the hill for this project?? (Or those without who witness a cute little mountain meltdown, send me a snap??) 😂 🙏 ❤️ . Happy Friday, ski school starts bright and early in the morning! . #jessagilbertart #getoutoftownvibe #skischool (at Powderpigs Ski School) https://www.instagram.com/p/CpDgxGKvO7W/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[cadcnce-archived]

" Welcome back, Wylan - san." There's a hint of a smile on Niijima's lips, it has been ... far too long since she last saw him.

The world is alien to him, now. A bird with clipped wings. A fish out of water. A trickster with no cards to play. Part of him already wishes he hadn’t taken the deal, that he’d stayed incarcerated in the states awaiting the chair or injection or… whatever it was. He hadn’t listened during the sentencing, let alone put up any sort of fight for himself. Sae had wanted to represent him but he refused any and all support from friends and family in his confession after turning himself in.

He didn’t want that outcome on her or anybody else. It was all on him. All of his sins were on himself and he was and had been ready to die for them. Murder, subterfuge, theft, grand theft auto, blackmail, the list of his accomplishments were something to be admired in some cases. Perhaps it was the realization that even part of himself was proud of what he accomplished that steeled his resolve all the more. He wasn’t normal but a special kind of broken. A bag of glass shaped into a gallivanting prankster.

Shit. He had barely been able to bring himself to notify his sister; a coded letter that told her everything she needed to know to make sure that she was safe and provided for without his continued presence and support. Given that she was still away at college there wasn’t all that much to do, fortunately, Wylan had done things with his income in such a way as that it couldn’t be traced back to Kat. Different last names and different histories to his identity and hers.

As long as she was safe…

Prison was a grey blur in his mind. Something he went through on some a defeated autopilot. The days bled into weeks, the weeks into months. It had been two and some years when he had his first visitor- how they had found him, he had no idea. The Kirijo Group. Mitsuru had exerted her influence in some way to extract Wylan from death row, with the provision that he would be under their strict supervision and charge with his location tracked. A bodyguard. That was one hell of a probation position. Wylan . . . isn’t sure why he accepted. When the deal had first been proposed he’d been ready to wave it off, apologize, and go back to betting cigarettes for cards.

Disembarking from the bus, going over rules and regulations expected by the Kirijo Group, his new residence for the forseeable future. Most discussions felt like a muddled tv show playing in another room, and he couldn’t bring himself to light a spark in his eyes. There was still too much to process. He was free from prison, and yet trapped in a hundred ways he’d never experienced before. The weight of the gps bracelet on his ankle will be a pretty constant reminder of that. No late night wanderings unless he reports it first, and given the mood of his officer he probably wouldn’t be able to get away with much.

Fuck.

He’s in a somewhat sour mood when there’s a knock at his door during his first week back, hardly presentable and not much the man he’d been during the Mental Shutdown case those years back. A white tank top with a couple spot stains from his microwave dinner and shorts he hadn’t taken off after working out. His eyes are listless as he opens the door expecting the officer, Yukio.

“Forget somethin el--�� He’s already speaking as he swings it open, but when his eyes lift from the floor it’s very much not the spritely knuckleduster. It’s...

“Sae?”

" Welcome back, Wylan - san."

“Y....yeah....” He stares dumbfound for a moment. Of all the folks that may come and see him, he’d be lying if he didn’t admit that the ex-prosecutor was the last person he’d been expecting. His departure was (intentionally) not on the best terms after all. And after everything he admitted to, the fact that she- He laughs in the middle of the awkward moment, bringing an arm up to wipe something from his eyes.

“Uh, yeah. It’s uh. Good to be back, you.... hey, come on in. I’ll get you something to drink. Really awful stuff, I promise. My probation officer is a dick.”

[weekendwarriorblog]

WHAT TO WATCH THIS WEEKEND August 9, 2019  - ONE CHILD NATION, VISION PORTRAITS, PEANUT BUTTER FALCON and lots more!

For this week’s column, I’m going to put a little more focus on two excellent documentaries out this week, even though there’s a few narratives worth checking out, as well..

The first doc I want to talk about is Nanfu Wang and Jialing Zhang’s ONE CHILD NATION  (Amazon Studios), an amazing look at the edict by the Chinese government in the ‘80s --  one that ran right up until fairly recently -- which pushed for families to only have one child in order to help the country’s struggling economy. The idea is that the less children to feed, the further resources can be spread. This “suggestion” was one that became a huge problem for families as young women were being kidnapped and sterilized after having one child and some families had to give up their second child for adoption, often against their own desires... though they were also given much needed money and food.  It’s an edict that becomes even more nefarious when you consider that women are having important personal decisions about having children being made for them by the government. (Sound familiar?) The running storyline through the movie involves a teen girl, whose twin was taken away for adoption when she was very young, as the filmmakers help her reconnect with her now-teen twin in America. Her story is so moving that if the two of them were actually reunited in the film, I probably would have broken down and had one of the ugliest cries I’ve ever had during a movie. As it it, it’s already a heartbreaking and emotional film with the situation so well portrayed by the two filmmakers, and it’s a movie I connected to from my osmosis having lived in Chinatown for 26 years. 

I imagine it will be on Amazon relatively soon, but if you’re a fan of great documentary filmmaking, you might want to seek this out in New York (at the Film Forum), Boston, L.A. and other cities this weekend.

I next want to talk about Rodney Evans’ VISION PORTRAITS (Stimulus Pictures), which opens exclusively at the Metrograph following its premiere at SXSW earlier this year. 

Not many people know this but a little over a year ago, I was dealing with my own vision problems where I had a scratched retina from shingles, but I was also having trouble with deteriorating vision in both eyes. I’m actually surprised that more of my editors didn’t ask me about why most of the pieces I submitted were zoomed in 175-250% as my eyesight got worse, but it was getting to the point where I wouldn’t be able to read any black writing on white background and had trouble reading some comics when letterers got a bit too creative with the word balloons. It got pretty serious until last year when an opthomologist suggested I get cataract surgery.

Filmmaker Rodney Evans has been dealing with his eyesight problems for years, but they had been getting worse as his filmmaking career progress. In a moment of introspection, he decided to interview other artists with vision impairment to see how they deal with it while making their art. These include dancer/choreographer Kayla Hamilton, writer Ryan Knighton and photograph John Dugdale, as the film also follows Evans own path in order to get a procedure to help alleviate his blindness.

The film is fascinating, especially the idea of “passing” as sighted, something I had to deal with during my own declining eyesight. (BTW, I’m fine now as I had that cataract surgery and I now wear reading glasses for most computer/phone activities.)

Evans will be at the Metrograph all weekend doing QnAs for his film with a number of special guests (including Winter’s Bone director Debra Granik on Sunday!) so if you’re interested in knowing more about how those with vision problems can still be creative artists, this is worth checking out. It’s not a sexy movie, but it’s an important one. It will open in L.A. at the Laemmle Royal on August 23.

I also want to mention that Garret Price’s doc Love, Antosha will open in New York at the Quad Cinema on Friday, and if you were ever a fan of actor Anton Yelchin, then this amazing doc with interviews with so many of the filmmakers and other actors he’s worked with is heartbreaking but essential. It’s an amazing list that even includes Nicolas Cage reading letters from Anton to his mother – brilliantly, no less -- but it’s also wonderful to hear such wonderful things about Yelchin from those who worked with him and called him friend.

Also, if you haven’t had a chance to see Toni Morrison: The Pieces I Am, now’s a good time to learn more about this amazing author who passed away earlier this week. It’s still playing in select cities but hopefully Magnolia Pictures will be able to get it out to more theaters with her passing.

There’s a LOT of wide releases this week, and it’s a pretty mixed bag. I’ve seen three of the movies, and one of the ones I liked I can say that I liked it – the other one is under embargo. I guess it might be more obvious which is which when my reviews turn up at The Beat later this week.

I will say that I enjoyed Tom Shadyac’s BRIAN BANKS (Bleecker Street), starring Aldis Hodges and Greg Kinnear, quite a bit, since I have friends in prison who have dealt with the broken justice system where it’s easier to make a plea deal and prevent many hours in court with lawyer hours billed. Banks was a Long Beach, California high school football star who was accused of rape. Although the allegations were false, he takes a deal and gets thrown in jail for eleven years, destroying his dreams of being in the NFL. Out on probation, Banks tries to get his football career going again but discovers that the limitations of his probation and a GPS ankle bracelet makes it impossible, as well as impossible to get a job. He turns to a lawyer with a group who works on getting those falsely accused exonerated and begins an uphill battle against the California justice system. The movie is quite meaningful and inspirational to watch Banks’ story being told with Hodges giving an excellent performance as the football player. I never knew about Banks, so I was fascinated by the film, although I’m sure there will be cynical people out there who feel that this is a cooking cutter legal film that doesn’t have the dramatic fireworks of other such films. I actually liked that Shadyac, who had nearly retired from the business after making low-brow comedies like Ace Ventura, Bruce Almighty and Evan Almighty, would return to tell something that’s more meaningful and important. I’m just not sure if anyone will want to pay to see this in theaters, so its wide release is fairly risky, but it’s a worthwhile venture for sure.

I’m not sure I’ll ever get around to seeing Paramount’s DORA AND THE LOST CITY OF GOLD, just ‘cause I’ve never watched the Nickelodeon cartoon, although it certainly looks cute, and I always love seeing Michael Peña (Ant-Man) and Isabela Moner was amazing in last year’s Instant Family. I guess I’ll see if I can get to this eventually, but it’s not a priority for me.

While I can’t say much about the Guillermo del Toro-produced André Øvredal-directed SCARY STORIES TO TELL IN THE DARK (CBS Films/Lionsgate) due to a review embargo, it’s based on the (apparently controversial) young adult horror novel series of the ‘80s, featuring a cast of younger newcomers like Zoe Colletti, Michael Garza, Gabriel Rush and Austin Zajur. I guess I can say that fans of old school horror films will probably like the use of practical FX in creating the creatures of urban legend, giving the movie a nostalgia factor we don’t frequently see in modern horror films.

I’ll have an interview with Øvredal later in the week, as well as a review, both over at The Beat.

I never read the Vertigo Comics series THE KITCHEN (New Line) when it was first published in 2014, but it offers an interesting premise of women taking over the Irish mob in 1978 Hell’s Kitchen, New York with three fantastic actors in Melissa McCarthy, Tiffany Haddish and Elisabeth Moss. You’ll have to wait for my review later today to see if it works or not, but you can read my interview with filmmaker Andrea Berloff right here.

I also haven’t read the novel THE ART OF RACING IN THE RAIN, which has been adapted by Fox starring Amanda Seyfried, Milo Ventimiglia with Kevin Costner voicing a dog, but I haven’t seen any of the dog movies this year, so this one won’t be the exception.

You can read my thoughts on the box office of the five movies above over at The Beat.

LIMITED RELEASES

Tyler Nilson and Michael Schwartz’s PEANUT BUTTER FALCON (Roadside Attractions/Armory Films/Endevor Content) was a nice surprise that premiered at the SXSW Film Festival. The idea of Shia Labeouf and Dakota Johnson (from the “50 Shades” movies) on a road trip with a young man with Downs’ Sydrome (breakout star Zack Gottsagen) sounds like it could be absolutely horrifying, so imagine my surprise when this turned out to be fairly warm and wonderful and actually quite funny. A lot of that comes from Gottsagen who is quite funny, and the movie allows you to laugh with him rather than at him, which is sometimes the case with movies involving mental disabilities. It’s a very enjoyable film that might have some appeal to wrestling fans – the title of the movie is Zack’s wrestling name and his goal is to get to a wrestling school run by Thomas Hayden Church. But there are some fun wrestling cameos in the movie as well. Maybe it’s no surprise that it actually won the Audience Award at this year’s SXSW Film Festival, as well.

It’s opening in New York, L.A. and a couple other cities like Austin, Dallas and others on Friday. For transparency, my friend Susan McPhail has a small role in the movie…but I liked the movie anyway :)

I was definitely intrigued by Bart Freundlich’s AFTER THE WEDDING (Sony Pictures Classics), which premiered at Sundance and starred Michelle Williams and Freundlich’s wife Julianne Moore in a gender-twist on the Susanne Bier movie of the same name from 2006, which starred Mads Mikkelsen, who was excellent in the movie. Williams and Moore are also very good in this movie which has Williams as a woman working with underprivileged orphans in India who travels to New York to meet with the CEO of a business looking to invest money in the program. Once there, she’s invited to a wedding, only to learn that the father of the groom is a former boyfriend (played by Billy Crudup). I’m not sure how much more I can say about the developments that occur, because they might be somewhat surprising if you haven’t seen the original movie but it leads to some high drama with Freundlich continuing his streak from the underrated Wolves a few years back. This opens in New York and L.A. this Friday.

Casey Affleck’s third movie as a director, LIGHT OF MY LIFE, might have gotten a festival release or a better theatrical release than the one normally given by Saban Films, but the allegations against him and the whole #MeToo movement has probably made it harder to sell the movie, especially with the filmmaker/star not doing interviews.

Tom Donahue’s doc THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING (Good Deed Entertainment),o opening at the IFC Center and in L.A., features some of the prominent female voices in Hollywood talking about the underrepresentation (and underpayment) of women in the movie industry. The film includes an amazing roster includes Geena Davis, also one of the film’s exec. producers, Marisa Tomei, Jessica Chastain, Meryl Streep, Rashida Jones and many, many more, and hearing what they have to say about their experiences in the industry is very enlightening and important.

Hari Sama’s THIS IS NOT BERLIN (Samuel Goldwyn), opening in New York at the IFC Center this Friday and in L.A. on August 23 is an intriguing coming of age film set in 1986 Mexico City, which harks back to Alfonso Cuaron’s Roma last year. It involves a seventeen-year old named Carlos (played by Xabiani Ponce de Léon) who doesn’t fit in but starts finding himself when he gets involved in the post-punk scene at a nightclub, although his best friend Gera (José Antonio Toledano) has trouble adjusting, causing fiction in the friendship.

In many ways, this remined more of Cuaron’s earlier film Y Tu Mama Tambien, although it’s a little more erratic in terms of tone, as well as being somewhat predictable about where things might go wrong. What’s especially interesting is the exploration of sexuality by the two friends in the movie and how that is affected as they go further down a rabbit hole of drugs and depravity.  The movie also stars Roma’s Marina de Tavira as Carlos’ mother, and while it probably won’t be for everyone, Sama offers a great new voice on the international filmmaking circuit.

Martin Freeman and Morena Baccarin (Deadpool) star in Jason Winer’s rom-com ODE TO JOY (IFC Films), which opens in select cities and On Demand this Friday. In it, Freeman plays a man suffering from narcolepsy who tries to overcome it when he falls in love. Also starring Melissa Rauch, Jake Lacy, Jane Curtin and more.

Lastly, Robi Michael’s psychological thriller Every Time I Die (Gravitas Ventures) stars Drew Fonteiro as a man who is murdered at a lake sending his consciousness travelling through the bodies of friends to warn them of the killer. Very high concept indeed...

STREAMING AND CABLE

As far as Netflix this week, I am looking forward to seeing the new crime and martial arts series WU ASSASSINS, starring Iko Uwais from The Raid and more recently, Stuber, which will debut on Thursday. There’s a lot of great martial arts talent in the movie including Mark Dacascos as well as Summer Glau from Firefly, so this should be a fun show. I’m even MORE excited for return of the series GLOW for its third season this Friday with Geena Davis being added to the mix. I love this show, maybe because I remember watching GLOW so fondly in the ‘80s.

REPERTORY

METROGRAPH (NYC):

As part of the ongoing Juraj Herz, retrospective of the Czech genre filmmaker, the Metrograph is premiering a new 4k restoration of his 1969 black and film The Cremator starting Friday, although the series will end on Thursday. This week, the Metrograph is also starting a new month-long series called “Godard/Karina Late Nights,” showing four of the collaborations between the French New Wave master and his muse Anna Karina. This Friday and Saturday, the series will screen the 1964 classic Band of Outsiders. This week’s Late Nites at Metrograph is Seijun Suzuki’s 1966 Yakuza crime-thriller Tokyo Drifterand the weekend’s Playtime: Family Matinees is Joe Johnston’s 1989 Disney family comedy Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, starring Rick Moranis. Also this Thursday is the latest installment of The Academy at Metrograph with the Oscar-nominated Mexican film Like Water from Chocolate (1992) with director Alfonso Arau in person. There are still some seats available but it might be sold out by the time you read this.

THE NEW BEVERLY  (L.A.):

Tarantino’s rep theater continues to mostly be booked up with mostly sold out shows of his ninth film Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, although the Weds matinee is the Rock Hudson/Doris Day classic Pillow Talk (1959)and the weekend’s KIDDEE MATINEE is Norman Tokar’s Sammy, the Way Out Seal from 1963.  Saturday morning is also the latest installment of the Bev’s “Cartoon Club.” Monday’s matinee is Francis Ford Coppola’s The Outsidersfrom 1983.

FILM FORUM (NYC):

The premiere downtown NY arthouse continues its impressive “Burt Lancaster” series this week with a lot of fantastic films including John Sturges’ Gunfight at the OK Corral (1957) on Thursday, Friday and Saturday and Robert Aldrich’s Ulzanna’s Raid (1972) on Thursday, Saturday is also John Frankenheimer’s Birdman of Alcatraz (1962) and Seven Days in May (1964), then on Sunday, Run Silent Run Deep (1958), plus the Forum will also screen the 1968 film The Swimmer, Elmer Gantry (1960) and MUCH more! In other words, this series is a bonanza of Lancaster riches, and next week begins another great repertory series!

EGYPTIAN THEATRE (LA):

This weekend’s series is “Rutger Hauer Remembered” with a screening of Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner  (1982) on Thursday, a 35mm double feature of Ladyhawke and Flesh + Blood (both from 1985) on Friday, a TRIPLE feature of The Hitchhiker (1986), Nighthawks  (1981) and the more recent Hobo with a Shotgun (2011) on Saturday, and then The Blood of Heroes and Blind Fury on Sunday.

AERO  (LA):

The AERO gets in on the retrospective bandwagon of one of Iran’s most respected filmmakers with “A Taste of Kiarostami,” beginning on Thursday with the late filmmaker’s recent films Like Someone in Love (2012) and 24 Frames (2017), Friday’s double feature is Taste of Cherry  (1997) and Ten (2002) and then Saturday is Close-Up  (1990) and The Wind Will Carry Us (1999) – most of these include a short, as well. The series concludes on Sunday with a triple feature of Abbas Kiarostami’s Koker Trilogy: Where is My Friend’s House?  (1987), And Life Goes On (1992) and Through the Olive Trees (1994). I’ll be perfectly honest that my knowledge of Kiarostami is not what it should be, but hopefully those in L.A. will check out some of these movies even if they don’t get the amazing Godfrey Cheshire hosting them.

Wednesday’s installment of the “Greg Proops Film Club” is a screening of Babette’s Feast and the AERO is getting in on the midnight movie craze on Friday night by showing David Lynch’s 1977 Eraserhead in conjunction with “Cinematic Void.”

QUAD CINEMA (NYC):

The Quad begins an impressive new series called “Beach Reads: From Sun to Screen” with a number of classic movie adaptations of some classic novels, including Airport (1970), The Deep  (1977), Arthur Hailey’s Hotel (1967), Mark Robson’s Valley of the Dolls (1967) – just cited in Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood – John Sturges’ Ice Station Zebra (1968) and many more classics. In conjunction with the New York premiere of the doc Love, Antosha, the Quad will also be showing two of Anton Yelchin’s latter-day films, that doc’s exec. producer Drake Doremus’ Like Crazy(2011) and Jeremy Saulnier’s Green Room (2015), both which are excellent and worth seeing. (And another major oops from last week is that I forgot to mention the Joan the Maid 4k Restorations showing at the Quad, so hopefully they’ll continue through the weekend.)

IFC CENTER (NYC)

Weekend Classics: Staff Picks Summer 2019 is Caroline’s pick of Louis Malle’s 1958 thriller Elevator to the Gallows, showing Friday through Sunday at 11AM. Waverly Midnights: Staff Picks Summer 2019, chosen by Shelby, is Harmony Korine’s Julien Donkey-Boy (1999) starring Eewen Bremner, and Late Night Favorites: Summer 2019 is Gore Verbinski’s The Ring from 2002. Also playing through the weekend is the IFC’s 60thanniversary 4k restoration of Alfred Hitchcock’s North By Northwest, starring Cary Grant, which will play most days in the early evening.

BAM CINEMATEK (NYC):

BAM’s new series “Punks, Poets & Valley Girls: Women Filmmkers” begins on Wednesday with Penelope Spheeris’ Suburbia (1983), which will be followed on Thursdsay by two more amazing music docs, The Decline of Western Civilization and The Decline of Western Civilization: The Metal Years. The series also includes Susan Seidelman’s Smithereens (1982) and Desperately Seeking Susan (1985), Bette Gordon’s Variety and lots more as it runs through August 20.

MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE (NYC):

The “Summer Matinees: Fantastic Worlds” series continues this week with the Oscar-winning Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse… in 3D! playing Weds. through Sunday at noon. MOMI will also have a 30thAnniversary screening of Spike Lee’sDo the Right Thing on Friday night, plus “See It Big! 70mm” continues with screenings of Alfonso Cuaron’s Roma (also from last year) as well as one or two more screenings of Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.

FILM OF LINCOLN CENTER (NYC):

Michel Gondry’s swill get a FREE screening at Governors Island’s Parade Ground on Friday night starting at 7pm. I missed this last week (what else is new?) but FilmLinc’s “Another Country: Outsider Visions of America” continues with a cinematic look at the immigrant experience.

ROXY CINEMA (NYC)

This week’s rep stuff includes the 1967 film Personaon Weds. and Saturday, and the 1963 Jean-Luc Godard film Contempt, starring Brigitte Bardot, Michael Picoli, Jack Palance and Fritz Lang as himself.

LANDMARK THEATRES NUART  (LA):

This week’s midnight offering is a weird one… DreamWorks Animation’s Shrek (2001)!

[huatenglobal]

#HUATENGLOBAL C05 Non removable gps tracking bracelet C5 physical tamper proof strap, health monitoring, messages pushing, SOS emergency calling, multiple alarms and health data monitoring, accept OEM&ODM

[capecoddaily]

It was reported that the Mashpee Police Department will do due diligence and conduct an internal investigation to determine if a police officer was justified in attempting to stop a motor vehicle operated by a violent career criminal wearing a GPS ankle bracelet, driving in a manner that endangered the public and eventually killing two innocent people.Will the state Probation Department investigate why the suspect’s GPS system did not work properly or was not monitored properly? [...]

[balikita]

Criminal justice advocates have been working hard to abolish cash bail schemes and dismantle the prison industrial complex. And one of the many tools touted as an alternative to incarceration is electronic monitoring or “EM”: a form of digital incarceration, often using a wrist bracelet or ankle “shackle” that can monitor a subject’s location, blood alcohol level, or breath. But even as the use of this new incarceration technology expands, regulation and oversight over it—and the unprecedented amount of information it gathers—still lags behind.

There are many different kinds of electronic monitoring schemes:

Active GPS tracking, where the transmitter monitors a person using satellites and reports location information in real time at set intervals.

Passive GPS tracking, where the transmitter tracks a person's activity and stores location information for download the next day.

Radio Frequency ("RF") is primarily used for “curfew monitoring.” A home monitoring unit is set to detect a bracelet within a specified range and then sends confirmation to a monitoring center.

Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitoring ("SCRAM") - analyzes a person's perspiration to extrapolate blood alcohol content once every hour.

Breathalyzer monitoring reviews and tests a subject’s breath at random to estimate BAC and typically has a camera.

Monitors are commonly a condition of pre-trial release, or post-conviction supervision, like probation or parole. They are sometimes a strategy to reduce jail and prison populations. Recently, EM’s applications have widened to include juveniles, the elderly, individuals accused or convicted of DUIs or domestic violence, immigrants awaiting legal proceedings, and adults in drug programs.

This increasingly wide use of EM by law enforcement remains relatively unchecked. That’s why EFF, along with over fifty other organizations, has endorsed a set of Guidelines for Respecting the Rights of Individuals on Electronic Monitoring. The Guidelines are a multi-stakeholder effort led by the Center for Media Justice's Challenging E-carceration project to outline the legal and policy considerations that law enforcement’s use of EM raises for monitored individuals’ digital rights and civil liberties.

For example, a paramount concern is the risk of racial discrimination. People of color tend to be placed on EM far more often than their white counterparts. For example, Black people in Cook County, IL make up 24% of the population, yet represent 70% of people on EM. This ratio mirrors the similarly skewed racial disparity in physical incarceration.

Another concern is cost shifting. People on EM often pay user fees ranging from $3-$35/day along with $100-$200 in setup charges, shifting the costs of electronic incarceration from the government to the monitored and their families. Usually, this disproportionately affects poor communities of color who are already over-policed and over-represented within the criminal justice and immigration systems.

Then there are the consequences to individual privacy that threaten the rights not just of the monitored, but also of those who interact with them. When children, friends, or family members rely on individuals on EM for transportation or housing, they often suffer privacy intrusions from the same mechanisms that monitor their loved ones.

Few jurisdictions have regulations limiting access to location tracking data and its attendant metadata, or specifying how long such information should be kept and for what purpose. Private companies that contract to provide EM to law enforcement typically store location data on monitored individuals and may share or sell clients’ information for a profit. This jeopardizes the safety and civil rights not just of the monitored, but also of their families, friends, and roommates who live, work, or socialize with them.

Just one example of how location information stored over time can provide an intimate portrait of someone’s life, and even be harvested by machine learning inferences to detect deviations in regular travel habits, is featured in this bi-analytics marketing video.

So, what do we do about EM? We must demand strict Constitutional safeguards against its misuse, especially because “GPS monitoring generates [such] a precise, comprehensive record of a person’s public movements that reflects a wealth of detail about her familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations” as the US Supreme Court recognized in US. v. Jones. Recent studies by the Pew Research Center in 2014 show that 82% of Americans consider the details of their physical location over time to be sensitive information, including 50% of Americans who consider it to be “very sensitive.” Thus, law enforcement should be required to get a warrant or other court order before using EM to track an individual’s location information.

For criminal defense attorneys looking for more resources on fighting EM, review our one-pager explainer and practical advice. And if you seek amicus support in your case, email stephanie@eff.org with the following information:

Case name & jurisdiction

Case timeline/pending deadlines

Defense Attorney contact information

Brief description of your EM issue 

Related Cases: 

US v. Jones

[neptunecreek]

The New Frontier of E-Carceration: Trading Physical for Virtual Prisons

Criminal justice advocates have been working hard to abolish cash bail schemes and dismantle the prison industrial complex. And one of the many tools touted as an alternative to incarceration is electronic monitoring or “EM”: a form of digital incarceration, often using a wrist bracelet or ankle “shackle” that can monitor a subject’s location, blood alcohol level, or breath. But even as the use of this new incarceration technology expands, regulation and oversight over it—and the unprecedented amount of information it gathers—still lags behind.

There are many different kinds of electronic monitoring schemes:

Active GPS tracking, where the transmitter monitors a person using satellites and reports location information in real time at set intervals.

Passive GPS tracking, where the transmitter tracks a person's activity and stores location information for download the next day.

Radio Frequency ("RF") is primarily used for “curfew monitoring.” A home monitoring unit is set to detect a bracelet within a specified range and then sends confirmation to a monitoring center.

Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitoring ("SCRAM") - analyzes a person's perspiration to extrapolate blood alcohol content once every hour.

Breathalyzer monitoring reviews and tests a subject’s breath at random to estimate BAC and typically has a camera.

Monitors are commonly a condition of pre-trial release, or post-conviction supervision, like probation or parole. They are sometimes a strategy to reduce jail and prison populations. Recently, EM’s applications have widened to include juveniles, the elderly, individuals accused or convicted of DUIs or domestic violence, immigrants awaiting legal proceedings, and adults in drug programs.

This increasingly wide use of EM by law enforcement remains relatively unchecked. That’s why EFF, along with over fifty other organizations, has endorsed a set of Guidelines for Respecting the Rights of Individuals on Electronic Monitoring. The Guidelines are a multi-stakeholder effort led by the Center for Media Justice's Challenging E-carceration project to outline the legal and policy considerations that law enforcement’s use of EM raises for monitored individuals’ digital rights and civil liberties.

For example, a paramount concern is the risk of racial discrimination. People of color tend to be placed on EM far more often than their white counterparts. For example, Black people in Cook County, IL make up 24% of the population, yet represent 70% of people on EM. This ratio mirrors the similarly skewed racial disparity in physical incarceration.

Another concern is cost shifting. People on EM often pay user fees ranging from $3-$35/day along with $100-$200 in setup charges, shifting the costs of electronic incarceration from the government to the monitored and their families. Usually, this disproportionately affects poor communities of color who are already over-policed and over-represented within the criminal justice and immigration systems.

Then there are the consequences to individual privacy that threaten the rights not just of the monitored, but also of those who interact with them. When children, friends, or family members rely on individuals on EM for transportation or housing, they often suffer privacy intrusions from the same mechanisms that monitor their loved ones.

Few jurisdictions have regulations limiting access to location tracking data and its attendant metadata, or specifying how long such information should be kept and for what purpose. Private companies that contract to provide EM to law enforcement typically store location data on monitored individuals and may share or sell clients’ information for a profit. This jeopardizes the safety and civil rights not just of the monitored, but also of their families, friends, and roommates who live, work, or socialize with them.

Just one example of how location information stored over time can provide an intimate portrait of someone’s life, and even be harvested by machine learning inferences to detect deviations in regular travel habits, is featured in this bi-analytics marketing video.

So, what do we do about EM? We must demand strict Constitutional safeguards against its misuse, especially because “GPS monitoring generates [such] a precise, comprehensive record of a person’s public movements that reflects a wealth of detail about her familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations” as the US Supreme Court recognized in US. v. Jones. Recent studies by the Pew Research Center in 2014 show that 82% of Americans consider the details of their physical location over time to be sensitive information, including 50% of Americans who consider it to be “very sensitive.” Thus, law enforcement should be required to get a warrant or other court order before using EM to track an individual’s location information.

For criminal defense attorneys looking for more resources on fighting EM, review our one-pager explainer and practical advice. And if you seek amicus support in your case, email stephanie@eff.org with the following information:

Case name & jurisdiction

Case timeline/pending deadlines

Defense Attorney contact information

Brief description of your EM issue 

Related Cases: 

US v. Jones

from Deeplinks http://ift.tt/2pvQsjW