#probate attorney connecticut

[disabilityplanninginvernon]

Which is A Higher Attorney or A Lawyer?

Choosing whether an attorney or lawyer is ‘higher’ can be a tricky question, ultimately depending on a variety of factors. However, for the most part, attorneys are often seen as the more ‘esteemed’ choice between the two professions, as attorneys traditionally have more education and regulating standards than lawyers.

Attorneys are usually a more suitable choice when considering more complicated cases such as business matters, medical malpractice, taxation concerns, and criminal cases. This is because these cases generally require more attention to detail when it comes to understanding the legal requirements involved. Attorneys often have more thorough knowledge in terms of legal practices and have spent more time learning the finer details of jurisprudence. An attorney must receive a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree, also known as a Juris Doctor (JD), after graduating law school. In order to sit for the bar exam and become a licensed attorney, most states require a certain amount of additional education in advanced studies to supplement their JD.

On the other hand, it generally takes less effort to become a lawyer than an attorney. Lawyers only need to possess a bachelor’s degree in order to apply to law school, and then must complete the same amount of classes and pass the same state bar exam as attorneys. In addition, they often have less strict business ethics and moral guidelines that they must adhere to in their daily practice. It is this factor that generally allows lawyers to work on less rigorous cases such as estates, unions, and immigration, rather than more mentally taxing cases such as corporate legalese. Therefore, due to the fact that lawyers often have less comprehensive knowledge compared to attorneys, it can sometimes be difficult to judge the quality and accuracy of their work.

Overall, while both attorneys and lawyers have the same primary goal in mind - to offer high-quality legal representation to their clients - attorneys tend to be more preferred in the field due to their more stringent standards and more comprehensive training in the legal field. An attorney’s educational background and knowledge is often found to be more satisfactory for certain cases that require more intricate legal knowledge than what a lawyer can offer. In the end, it is a personal decision between the individual and their lawyer or attorney when deciding which one is more suitable for their specific needs.

[reality-detective]

💢 Very interesting 🤔

LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE (John Wayne's Daughter) Obama's S.S. Number

For those of you who don't know but at the very bottom of this writing, the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne's daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.

Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked into President Obama's Social Security number.

Jean Paul Ludwig or Barack Hussein Obama? S.S.N. #042-68-4425

WOW, read this, it's short - very interesting.

An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.

Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned S.S.N. 042-68-4425 (President Obama's current SSN) rec'd on or about March 1977.

Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu, Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died that was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’ s Connecticut SSN for her grandson, Barry Obama.

Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of Defending Obama.

---------------------------------------------------

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born", there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud, and a federal offense.

If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world.

"In God We Trust."

[trickricksblog08]

💢 Very interesting indeed! Check this out!!🧐🤔⬇️

LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE (John Wayne's Daughter) Obama's SS Number

For those of you who don't know but at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne's daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.

Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked this out! I was wondering who was going to do research into President Obama's Social Security number.

Jean Paul Ludwig or Barack Hussein Obama? S . S . N#042-68-4425

WOW, read this, it's short - very interesting.

An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.

Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (President Obama's current SSN) rec'd on or about March 1977.

Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’ s Connecticut SSN for her grandson, Barry Obama.

Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of Defending Obama.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born", there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud, and a federal offense.

Let's all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists. If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world.

"In God We Trust."

[awesomecooperlove]

💢 Very interesting indeed! Check this out!!🧐🤔⬇️

LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE (John Wayne's Daughter) Obama's SS Number

For those of you who don't know but at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne's daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.

Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked this out! I was wondering who was going to do research into President Obama's Social Security number.

Jean Paul Ludwig or Barack Hussein Obama? S . S . N#042-68-4425

WOW, read this, it's short - very interesting.

An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.

Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (President Obama's current SSN) rec'd on or about March 1977.

Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’ s Connecticut SSN for her grandson, Barry Obama.

Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of Defending Obama.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born", there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud, and a federal offense.

Let's all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists. If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world.

"In God We Trust."

https://t.me/CharlieWardFriends

[cyphorical]

ChatGPT on Voting Rights, Restrictions

Q: Which US states bar someone from voting when they have been convicted of a felony?

A: As of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, the following US states barred someone from voting when they have been convicted of a felony:

Alabama

Arizona

Florida

Iowa

Kentucky

Mississippi

Nebraska

Nevada

Tennessee

However, it is worth noting that voting rights laws can change, and some of these states may have updated their policies since then. Additionally, there may be other restrictions on voting rights for people with felony convictions in other states.

Q: Explain about other restrictions in other states.

A: While the above-mentioned states permanently restrict voting rights for those convicted of a felony, other states have different policies. Some states restore voting rights after completion of a sentence, including parole and probation. Other states restore voting rights after a certain period of time has passed since the completion of the sentence.

For example, in California, people with felony convictions who are not currently in state or federal prison or on parole are eligible to vote. In Maine and Vermont, people with felony convictions never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated.

It is important to note that voting rights laws can vary greatly from state to state, and they are subject to change. Therefore, it is always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney for the most up-to-date information.

Q: Continuing from above which states lose and then regain voting rights after a sentence is served?

A: As of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, the following states lose and then regain voting rights after a sentence is served:

Alaska

Arkansas

Colorado

Connecticut

Georgia

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Kansas

Louisiana

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Missouri

Montana

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

Utah

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

However, as I mentioned earlier, voting rights laws can change and it is possible that some of these states may have updated their policies since then. It is always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney for the most up-to-date information.

Q: I understand that the laws may change and your knowledge is limited to the cutoff date of 2021, so you don't need to repeat that information.

A: Thank you for letting me know, I apologize for the repetition. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask!

Q: Which states permanently ban felons from voting?

A: As of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, the following US states permanently ban felons from voting:

Alabama

Arizona

Florida

Iowa

Kentucky

Mississippi

Nebraska

Nevada

Tennessee

It's worth noting that some of these states have recently passed laws that have restored voting rights to some people with felony convictions. For example, in 2018, Florida passed a constitutional amendment that restored voting rights to people with felony convictions who had completed their sentences, although this law has been the subject of ongoing legal challenges. Again, it's always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney for the most up-to-date information.

Q: So it sounds like there are three categories for felons who can vote? Some can never vote again. Some can vote after the sentence. some have no restriction. Are there any other categories?

Yes, that's correct. The three main categories for felons and their voting rights are:

Permanent disenfranchisement: In some states, people with felony convictions are permanently barred from voting even after they have served their sentences and completed any probation or parole.

Voting rights restoration after completion of sentence: In some states, people with felony convictions are eligible to vote after they have completed their sentences, including any probation or parole. In some cases, there may be a waiting period before voting rights are restored.

No restriction: In some states, people with felony convictions never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated.

It's worth noting that some states also have additional requirements for voting rights restoration, such as the payment of fines or completion of community service. These requirements can vary widely by state.

Additionally, there may be some variation within each of these categories. For example, some states may have different rules for people with certain types of felony convictions or for people who have multiple felony convictions.

Q: 1. Which states require felons to pay fines to vote again? 2. Which states require felons to complete community service to vote again?

A: As of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, the following US states have additional requirements for voting rights restoration:

Some states require felons to pay fines or restitution before their voting rights are restored. The specific rules can vary by state, and some states may have different requirements for different types of felony convictions. For example, Florida requires people with felony convictions to pay all fines, fees, and restitution before their voting rights are restored, while in New Mexico, people with felony convictions are not required to pay fines or restitution before their voting rights are restored.

Some states require felons to complete community service before their voting rights are restored. Again, the specific rules can vary by state, and some states may have different requirements for different types of felony convictions. For example, in Colorado, people with felony convictions must complete their sentences, including any community service requirements, before their voting rights are restored.

It's important to note that voting rights laws can change and that this information may not be up-to-date. If you have specific questions about your voting rights as a person with a felony conviction, it's always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney.

Q: Name the states that have a waiting period to vote after serving a felony sentence.

A: As of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, the following US states have a waiting period before felons can vote after serving their sentences:

Alabama: A waiting period of 5 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

Arizona: A waiting period of 2 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

Florida: A waiting period of at least 5 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole, and payment of all fines and restitution.

Iowa: A waiting period of until the completion of parole.

Kentucky: A waiting period of 5 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

Mississippi: A waiting period of until the completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

Nebraska: A waiting period of 2 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

Nevada: A waiting period of until the completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

Tennessee: A waiting period of until the completion of sentence, including any probation or parole.

It's important to note that voting rights laws can change and that this information may not be up-to-date. If you have specific questions about your voting rights as a person with a felony conviction, it's always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney.

Q: You gave two answers for Alabama?

A: I apologize for the confusion. The correct answer for Alabama is a waiting period of 5 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Q: You gave two answers for Arizona?

A: I apologize for the error in my previous response. The correct answer is that Arizona has a waiting period of 2 years after completion of sentence, including any probation or parole, before a person with a felony conviction can regain their right to vote. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Q: Are there any [places] where felons have a permanent ban vote, and no waiting period?

A: Yes, there are some US states that impose a permanent ban on voting for felons with certain types of convictions, without any possibility of restoration. As of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, the following US states have permanent felony disenfranchisement laws for certain types of convictions:

Iowa: People with felony convictions for certain offenses, including murder, manslaughter, and some sex offenses, are permanently disenfranchised and cannot have their voting rights restored.

Kentucky: People with felony convictions for certain offenses, including murder, treason, and some sex offenses, are permanently disenfranchised and cannot have their voting rights restored.

Florida: People with felony convictions for certain offenses, including murder and sexual offenses, are permanently disenfranchised and must apply for clemency in order to have their voting rights restored.

It's important to note that voting rights laws can change and that this information may not be up-to-date. If you have specific questions about your voting rights as a person with a felony conviction, it's always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney.

Q: So that makes four categories?

A: Yes, based on my previous responses, there are generally four categories of voting rights restoration laws for people with felony convictions in the US:

Permanent disenfranchisement: Some states impose a permanent ban on voting for people with certain types of felony convictions, without any possibility of restoration.

Restoration after completion of sentence: Some states automatically restore voting rights to people with felony convictions after they have completed their sentence, including any probation or parole.

Restoration after waiting period: Some states require people with felony convictions to wait for a certain period of time after completing their sentence, including any probation or parole, before their voting rights are restored.

Restoration after completing additional requirements: Some states require people with felony convictions to complete additional requirements, such as paying fines or completing community service, before their voting rights are restored.

It's important to note that the laws can vary by state, and there may be different rules for different types of felony convictions. Additionally, voting rights laws can change over time. If you have specific questions about your voting rights as a person with a felony conviction, it's always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney.

Q: Actually five categories of you count no restrictions.

A: Yes, you are correct. I apologize for the oversight. The five categories of voting rights restoration laws for people with felony convictions in the US are:

Permanent disenfranchisement: Some states impose a permanent ban on voting for people with certain types of felony convictions, without any possibility of restoration.

Restoration after completion of sentence: Some states automatically restore voting rights to people with felony convictions after they have completed their sentence, including any probation or parole.

Restoration after waiting period: Some states require people with felony convictions to wait for a certain period of time after completing their sentence, including any probation or parole, before their voting rights are restored.

Restoration after completing additional requirements: Some states require people with felony convictions to complete additional requirements, such as paying fines or completing community service, before their voting rights are restored.

No restrictions: Some states do not impose any voting restrictions on people with felony convictions, and their voting rights are automatically restored upon completion of their sentence, including any probation or parole.

Again, it's important to note that the laws can vary by state, and there may be different rules for different types of felony convictions. Additionally, voting rights laws can change over time. If you have specific questions about your voting rights as a person with a felony conviction, it's always a good idea to check with local election officials or an attorney.

Q: Have there been any proposals to unify the rules at the federal level?.

Yes, there have been proposals to unify the rules for voting rights restoration for people with felony convictions at the federal level. One such proposal is the Democracy Restoration Act, which was introduced in Congress in 2019. The bill would restore voting rights to people with felony convictions who have completed their sentences, including any probation or parole, in federal elections. It would also provide incentives for states to adopt similar reforms in their own laws.

In addition, there have been calls for a constitutional amendment to enshrine the right to vote for all Americans, regardless of their criminal history. The proposed amendment, called the Democracy Restoration Amendment, would declare that the right to vote is fundamental and that it cannot be denied or abridged based on a person's criminal history.

However, as of my knowledge cutoff date of 2021, no federal voting rights restoration legislation has been passed into law, and the laws governing voting rights for people with felony convictions continue to vary widely by state.

Q: How close did those proposals come to being in the law?

A: The Democracy Restoration Act and the Democracy Restoration Amendment have both been introduced in Congress, but neither proposal has yet become law.

The Democracy Restoration Act was first introduced in Congress in 2015 and has been reintroduced in subsequent sessions. The bill has garnered support from a number of lawmakers and advocacy groups, but it has not advanced to a full vote in either the House or the Senate.

The Democracy Restoration Amendment has not been introduced in Congress, but it has been advocated for by various organizations and individuals. Constitutional amendments require approval by two-thirds of both the House and the Senate, as well as ratification by three-fourths of the states, which is a difficult and time-consuming process.

Overall, while there has been some support for federal voting rights restoration legislation, it has not yet gained enough traction to become law. However, as the issue of voting rights continues to be a topic of national debate, it's possible that these proposals or similar ones could be reintroduced and gain more momentum in the future.

[maranofamilylawyers]

Sydney Family Lawyers

A Sydney Family Lawyer can help with various legal matters. Some of these include divorce and separation, children’s matters, property settlement, and domestic violence. It is important to choose a family lawyer with good communication skills and empathy.

If you are experiencing separation issues, it is best to hire a Sydney Family Law Specialist who has the knowledge and expertise to handle your matter. They can help you navigate the process and get your life back on track after separation.

Doolan Wagner Family Lawyers

Doolan Wagner Sydney Family Lawyers is a based law firm that specializes in family law. They handle cases involving divorce, property settlement, child custody, and domestic violence. They also offer legal services for restraining orders and appeals. Their lawyers have extensive experience in the industry and are well-versed in the local laws.

The firm’s criminal law practice handles matters related to bail applications, Section 2 application (mental health), and District Court appeals. They have an in-house counsel, a notary public, and solicitors agent. They are available to assist clients 24/7.

Family law is a complex area of the law that involves numerous facets of a relationship. A good family lawyer in Lower Northern Sydney can help you navigate this challenging process with sensitivity and empathy.

Shore Lawyers

Attorney Shore has been practicing law in New Haven County for nearly a decade. She is a member of the Connecticut Bar Association and has been on several committees, including the Family Law and Estates & Probate sections and the Young Lawyers Executive Committee. She also serves on the Board of Directors for the New Haven County Bar Foundation.

She is a partner and co-owner of Wolf & Shore Law Group and practices in family law, estate planning and juvenile law. She has completed GAL and assigned counsel training and is accredited in veterans benefits.

She is a passionate client advocate and zealously advocates for clients’ rights in courtroom trials. She also coaches a high school mock trial team. She is a proud member of the Electric City BNI group.

Maatouks Law Group

Maatouks Law Group offers legal services in Sydney CBD, Liverpool, and Narellan. Its lawyers specialize in family, property, and immigration law. They also offer mediation and arbitration services. They are available around the clock to assist you with your legal needs.

Peter Maatouks began his legal career in 1993 when he commenced employment with a medium sized firm in Parramatta. Since then, he has become one of the most sought after Sydney lawyers. His success is due to his willingness to be accessible to the Australian public. He puts his face and contact details out in the public domain and takes calls 24/7.

The firm’s criminal lawyers handle bail applications, Section 2 applications, and District Court appeals. Their family lawyers help clients with divorce, property settlement, and same-sex marriages.

Goldman & Co. Lawyers & Attorneys

Goldman & Co is an international legal firm specializing in dispute resolution and litigation, private investments, international tax, wealth and assets. Its discreet commercial private client expertise attracts high net worth individuals and wealthy families both locally and internationally.

Janet Goldman has developed extensive relationships with financial and insurance companies, fellow attorneys, and the Rhode Island courts. She uses these connections to guide clients through the complexities of bankruptcy and other debtrelated issues, divorces, and family law matters.

She also has experience in complex real estate and commercial litigation, including mortgage foreclosures and landlord/tenant matters. She has counseled and litigated numerous issues pertaining to condominiums and cooperatives and has experience in arbitration and mediation. She has also lectured extensively on the subjects of employment and insurance coverage law.

O’Sullivan Legal

Alison O’Sullivan delivers multifaceted and compassionate legal Legal advisor Sydney to private clients in complex family law, guardianship, and contested estate matters. Her extensive experience in these sensitive cases, combined with her empathy, allows her to guide clients through every step of their legal journey with compassion and expertise.

In addition to family law, she has significant commercial litigation and creditor’s rights experience. She also has an active international practice, advising public and private companies on a variety of corporate transactions and disputes.

After graduating from Cornell Law School summa cum laude, she clerked for Chief

Judge Levin Campbell of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States. She also has substantial experience in complex financial litigation, including mergers and acquisitions and white-collar criminal defense work.

[gook54-blog]

LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE (John Wayne's Daughter) Obama's S.S. Number

For those of you who don't know but at the very bottom of this writing, the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne's daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.

Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked into President Obama's Social Security number.

An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.

Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned S.S.N. 042-68-4425 (President Obama's current SSN) rec'd on or about March 1977.

Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there

is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu, Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died that was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’ s Connecticut SSN for her grandson, Barry Obama.

Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of Defending Obama.

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born", there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud, and a federal offense.

If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world.

[webercarrier2b]

Criminal lawyers ct

This section of the penal code guarantees the right to legal representation to every person who is the focus of a criminal inquiry. "Law" refers to a broad category of academic fields. In this sector, attorneys can choose to specialize in litigation, personal injury, commercial and residential real estate, family law (including divorce and child custody), or both. Under bankruptcy law and commercial law, there are several subfields. Business law leads the legal field in expertise. In order to make all pertinent legal areas easily accessible to other attorneys, we have carefully documented them all. Companies that run into problems frequently seek advice from lawyers who specialize in corporate law. The virtually limitless subspecialties that are available to lawyers exacerbate their already significant challenges.

Criminal lawyers ct

Everyone should have easy access to a knowledgeable criminal defense lawyer in case they wish to refute claims or feel threatened. Participation in this seminar is required. Being able to remain composed in the face of criticism is a commendable quality in an expert. When protecting your rights and interests is crucial, this is the right thing to do. The meeting is too crucial to be postponed at this time. If this choice is made under duress, the consequences can be disastrous. Thus, we will accept that at face value criminal attorneys in Connecticut Identifying and resolving that fundamental problem is our current top goal. An excessively harsh punishment could be imposed even in situations where guilt is established. This crime may result in financial fines, community service requirements, probation, or potentially license suspension. You may have completed the job if you had arrived at one of these sites earlier. I apologize sincerely if this appears like a huge list. Choosing to have a criminal record removed can have a profound impact on one's life. It is not stated how long this contractual term will last. You alone have the responsibility. Staff members who break the law without informing their boss face harsh consequences. It seems like lately, you've been thinking along these lines more frequently. If you take this action, your odds of achieving these outcomes will increase. Our legal team at Weber, Carrier, Boiczyk & Chace, LLP is aware of the lethal consequences of a guilty verdict. Since they would do whatever it takes to ensure the safety of their customers, you may put your trust in them. They have reached the peak of their profession thanks to their unwavering perseverance. They can handle this aspect of the case thanks to their extensive background in criminal defense. Being quick is really important. We are prepared to represent you in court if something occurs that could materially reduce your standard of living, both now and in the future. You'll get the most use out of your stuff if you follow these procedures. If ensuring your safety comes first, proceed with extreme caution. Given the circumstances, you must proceed with the utmost caution in your immediate action. We won't stop working until your rights are upheld and every claim is investigated. Our proactive and fundamental approach may prove to be the decisive factor in any legal matter. The legal team at Weber, Carrier, Boiczyk & Chace, LLP can help you or a loved one avoid paying large fines. Several illegal acts are connected to these claims. Connecticut businesses face immense pressure to find a solution because their clientele comes from all across the state. Among the traffic infractions that our clients have successfully prosecuted are speeding, drunk driving, and irresponsible driving. The police have accused these people of forced entry, theft, infiltration, and burglary, among other offenses. Break-in reports proliferated quickly. I am really sorry for anyone who is encountering the legal system for the first time. We are facing a formidable foe. I usually succeed in achieving my goals when I set my sights on them. Creating a compelling case against you is the prosecution's main objective. As of yet, no one outside of our little circle has been notified. If they follow this counsel to the letter, they will succeed. When handling legal concerns, having legal representation is essential. The most crucial element in attaining therapeutic efficacy is regular attendance. Our top priority is ensuring your safety. Like most people, you appear to have inherited a gift for storytelling. Within your own organization, you are not just a number. Proceed with extreme caution. Since you are recognized to be responsible for gathering this important information, we have complete faith in you. I beseech you to place complete trust in my announcement right now.

[weber-carrier-boiczyk-chace]

Weber, Carrier, Boiczyk & Chace, LLP

This section of the penal code guarantees the right to counsel for all persons who are the focus of a criminal investigation. Within the legal profession, one can find numerous subspecialties. This broader area of law encompasses a number of subspecialties, such as family law (including matters pertaining to divorce and child custody), commercial and residential real estate, litigation, and personal injury. Additional domains include insolvency and company law. When it comes to the law, commercial law is unrivaled criminal lawyers ct For your convenience, we have painstakingly recorded every branch of law that is relevant to attorneys. Many businesses consult with lawyers that focus on corporate law for guidance. Having access to an infinite number of subspecialties makes an already difficult job even more so for legal practitioners.

Appointments with competent criminal defense attorneys should not be difficult to obtain for anyone who is fearful for their safety or who is facing criminal accusations. Everyone is expected to be present during this seminar. You need to keep your record spotless if you value your professional reputation. If protecting your rights and interests is your first priority, you should do this. This meeting must end immediately because of its importance. This decision could affect a lot of people, so think carefully about it. This leads us to believe that it must be true. Our current focus is on resolving that fundamental problem. In the event that you are found guilty, an unduly severe penalty remains an option. Fines, community service, probation, or loss of license are all possible outcomes of this infraction. If we have a plan, we should be able to reach one of these locations by the deadline. If it seems like I gave you a big list, please accept my apologies. There will be lasting consequences for the offender if they opt to maintain a criminal record. The exact duration of this contract provision's validity is unknown. You alone are to blame for this. If an employee violates the law without informing their supervisor, the consequences could be catastrophic. That these thoughts might be popping into your head more frequently is borne out by this. If you want a better chance of getting these results, you should do this.

The seriousness of the matter and the consequences of a guilty verdict are not lost on the legal staff of Weber, Carrier, Boiczyk & Chace, LLP. They will protect their consumers from this by doing all it takes, so you can trust them. Thanks to their tireless efforts, they have finally made it to the top of their field. They are well-suited to handle this aspect of the case due to their experience in criminal defense. In a split second, staying vigilant becomes critical. In the event that something were to occur that may considerably diminish your present and future level of living, we will pursue legal action to safeguard you. If you follow these guidelines, your purchases will endure for a long time. Exercise extreme caution if you value your safety above anything else. Because of the current circumstances, we beg you to be very careful. Our number one goal is to investigate your claims thoroughly and defend your rights.

In any legal situation, our proactive and fundamental approach could prove to be the deciding factor.

Weber, Carrier, Boiczyk & Chace, LLP offers legal representation to customers who may be able to avoid heavy fines caused by any event. Each of these accusations pertains to a separate crime. It is entirely the responsibility of Connecticut businesses to find a solution, as they service clients across the entire state. Our clients have been successfully prosecuted for a variety of traffic offenses, including driving under the influence, irresponsible driving, and speeding. Multiple counts of burglary, forced entry, infiltration, and theft have been levied against these individuals by the law authorities. Word spread fast that intruders had gained access.

To everyone who is facing the justice system for the very first time, we hope everything works out for you. A lot of work will have to go into finishing it. Most of the time, I succeed in what I set out to do. The main goal of the prosecution is to build a solid case against you. Everything that we do from here on out will revolve around this. This advice will lead to success if they listen to it. When it comes to legal concerns, having legal representation is absolutely essential. Your development will be more noticeable if you consistently show up for your therapy sessions. You can ensure your own safety by following these instructions. You possess an innate gift for narrative, as do the majority of others. You are more than a statistic when you are by yourself. Here, you must exercise the utmost care. We trust you implicitly since we know it is your job to collect this vital information. Right now, I beg you to trust my announcement completely. It would be to your advantage to obtain this data. You can take our news reports at face value unless we say otherwise. By carefully reviewing your unique case and any relevant information, our objective is to build a solid defense on your behalf. We will not stop until we have ensured your success because it is our top priority.

Due to the gravity of the situation, we must promptly fortify our defenses. We value the time and attention you have given us.

If you have been the subject of complaints or think we should investigate them, please contact our office without delay. If our assistance might make a difference, we would be forever thankful. You must follow this procedure to the letter. Bring attention to your strong points in order to bolster your case. You have the option to deny the claims if you like. You need to be quick on your feet if you want anything done quickly. This is why it's so important to do it. If you require prompt assistance regarding a traffic ticket or criminal defense matter, please do not hesitate to reach out to us. If our assistance might make a difference, we would be forever thankful. Please let us know if there is anything we can do to assist you. Please don't hesitate to get in touch with us whenever you need any help with your project.

[wikifoxnews]

Who is Hadley Palmer ( Connecticut socialite arrested ) Wiki, Bio, Age, Crime, Arrest, Incident Details, Investigations and More Facts

Hadley Palmer Biography                                                Hadley Palmer Wiki

A wealthy Connecticut woman went from celebrity to registered s*x offender on Tuesday when she was sentenced to a year in prison for secretly filming a minor and others at her luxurious beachfront mansion.

Hadley Palmer, 54, faces 10 years on the s*x offender registry and 20 years probation after reaching a plea deal and confessing to the charges in January, although details of her case have been mysteriously withheld from the public. Palmer did not speak during his sentencing in Stamford Superior Court except to answer "yes" and "no" questions, but his attorney called the sentence fair. “She took responsibility for her actions,” defense attorney Michael Meehan said of Palmer, who has been behind bars for 90 days. "He's a very thoughtful, loving and genuine person." Connecticut socialite Hadley Palmer sentenced to 1 year in prison and will spend 10 years on the s*x offender registry after filming three minors while they were naked inside her $10M mansion pic.twitter.com/yyEO54k8Pw The disgraced socialite was seen hugging and kissing an unidentified man before entering the courthouse. She cried and wiped away her tears before entering the courtroom and then walking out in handcuffs. The unidentified man left the courthouse covering his face with a balaclava. He did not respond to questions from reporters outside the courthouse. Palmer, a mother of four from a wealthy family, admitted that between 2017 and 2018 she filmed people naked or in their underwear with "the intention of capturing that person's s*xual desire or" to excite or gratify another person. " Although she pleaded guilty to three counts of voyeurism and assaulting a minor on January 19, other details of the charges against her remain a mystery. Palmer's case remains sealed in a move that open government advocates have described as highly unusual. The Associated Press argued that Palmer's notes may have been published with the victims' names or changed to false names to protect their privacy, as is usually the case in Connecticut s*x crimes cases. . However, Judge John Blawie chose to keep the details of the case largely secret from the public, despite denying a request by the defense to close the courthouse during parts of the sentencing and trial, a reported the AP. Palmer was arrested in October 2021 and quickly placed on an expedited rehabilitation program requiring case files to be closed. But the allegations against her were so serious that she should not have been eligible for the program, according to the AP. The two heaviest charges against her – employment of a minor in lewd entertainment and possession of child pornography – were dropped as part of her plea deal. Palmer is the daughter of hedge fund founder Jerrold Fine and is in the process of divorcing venture capitalist Bradley Palmer. Read the full article

[disabilityplanninginvernon]

The 5-second Trick for Probate Attorney in Connecticut

Undecided regarding the future methods? Lawyers from our comprehensive community are Prepared to reply to your query.

I am a Central Ny Native, and As well as my legislation follow knowledge, I have more than 30 several years of knowledge as an educator with the quality college and university stages. I am also the stage father or mother of a Unique requirements kid, and this continues to be instrumental in my development of skills being an advocate for special requires learners.

As a knowledgeable member of PLAN of Connecticut, Attorney Breg counsels folks with Specific requires and advises them about special wants trusts. Attorney Breg also has techniques in the region of real estate.

When screening makes sure you do not use any real information that may detect you or almost every other person as demo variations of our themes shop all data you set in. Demo variations use cookies. If you retain testing we assume you are proud of it. For even further information make sure you refer to our privateness plan Okay

If the estate tax is due, it has to be compensated at the time of submitting the return. Extensions to file the estate tax return, both federal and condition, are permissible.

Diana, USA I did not get a lot of replies but those I did get were so extremely beneficial, And I am grateful for this avenue to have the ability to arrive at out and find the appropriate attorney for me.

The update should include the approximate degree of any distributions built, the approximate amount of money remaining on hand, and The explanations that the administration hasn't concluded.

Ponvirak O. suggests, "I consulted with Rohit concerning a litigation challenge and he was extremely well-informed of the authorized probate attorney in Connecticut challenges and very comprehension of my situation.

Once the 5-month notice to creditor interval expires, the executor has a further 60 days to file a Return and Listing of Statements with the probate court docket, detailing what bills and statements have been built in opposition to the estate.

“Most popular” listings, or All those with highlighted Site buttons, show YP advertisers who directly deliver specifics of their corporations to help you shoppers make much more educated obtaining selections. YP advertisers obtain higher placement during the default buying of search results and may appear in sponsored listings on the best, aspect, or bottom of the search engine results website page.

It is only when belongings are handed to other beneficiaries or heirs at legislation that an estate tax is imposed.

Figure out what kind of real estate lawyer you would like. Lots of states need a real estate attorney to take care of sale closing paperwork. For more sophisticated matters for instance a real estate offer absent awry or foreclosure, you’ll want to discover an attorney that has effectively handled conditions like yours.  

If a probate bond was essential, the court will send the surety corporation a certificate stating that the fiduciary has complied with all orders of your court docket referring to the settlement from the estate and terminating the probate bond.

[reality-detective]

Very interesting indeed! Check this out!👇

LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE (John Wayne's Daughter) Obama's SS Number

For those of you who don't know but at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne's daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.

Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked this out! I was wondering who was going to do research into President Obama's Social Security number.

Jean Paul Ludwig or Barack Hussein Obama? S . S . N#042-68-4425

WOW, read this, it's short - very interesting.

An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.

Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (President Obama's current SSN) rec'd on or about March 1977.

Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’ s Connecticut SSN for her grandson, Barry Obama.

Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of Defending Obama.

----------------------------------------------------

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born", there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud, and a federal offense.

Let's all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists. If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world. 🤔

"In God We Trust." 💫

[lawpracticevernon-blog]

Estate Planning attorney in connecticut

Hire an Estate Planning Attorney in Vernon Connecticut to put a plan in place now that can provide peace of mind and control over your future.

[yourreddancer]

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

September 14, 2022 (Wednesday)

It appears that John Durham’s investigation into why the FBI opened an investigation into the ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russian operatives is coming to an end.

Durham’s investigation was a prime example of Trump’s attempt to use the Department of Justice not to enforce the nation’s laws, but to hurt his enemies, a charge former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman has made in his new book. Trump, Berman said, wanted his friends protected and his enemies—including former secretaries of state John Kerry and Hillary Clinton—prosecuted.

In April 2019, the month after Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election finally saw daylight, Attorney General William Barr tapped United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut John Durham to investigate the circumstances under which the FBI began to look into Russian interference in the election in the first place.

The appointment was clearly an attempt to continue to distract people from the results of the Mueller report, which Barr had had an instrumental role in diminishing. Barr took office on February 14, 2019, just as Mueller was finishing his report. As Mueller’s superior, Barr got a copy of the report before anyone else, and he spun it to the media, claiming it exonerated the president and his team. In fact, Mueller established that Russia had illegally intervened in the election to benefit Trump and that the campaign “expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” Mueller complained to Barr about the spin, but it was too late: the public had bought it.

Trump and his allies jumped on Durham's investigation, promising it would prove that FBI agents were part of a “Deep State” and that Durham would uncover “the crime of the century.” In December 2020, after Trump had lost the election, Barr revealed that he had made Durham a special counsel the previous October so that Durham could continue his work into the next administration. 

But the investigation itself fizzled. Durham pressed charges against only three people. One pleaded guilty to altering an email and was sentenced to probation and community service. A grand jury alleged two others lied to the FBI. One was acquitted of the charges last May. The other is supposed to go on trial next month but has asked a judge to throw out the case for lack of evidence. But Durham’s three-year investigation did provide talking points for those attacking the FBI’s Russia investigation, keeping alive Trump’s false claims that it was just a “witch hunt.”

Trump’s politicization of the Department of Justice was a profound attack on the principles of democracy. Using the law to attack enemies is a hallmark of authoritarians—just ask opposition leader Alexsei Navalny in Russia, who has been sentenced to incarceration on trumped-up charges to get him out of Russian president Vladimir Putin’s way—while it also encourages lawbreaking from those who don’t fear legal consequences.

We have seen that sense of being above the law today in stories about the willingness of Mississippi officials, including former governor Phil Bryant, to work with former NFL player Brett Favre to divert about $5 million in federal welfare funds from helping people in poverty to building a volleyball facility at the University of Southern Mississippi, where his daughter was a volleyball player. 

We have seen it in the anger that Trump allies show when law enforcement treats them as it would anyone suspected of lawbreaking. MyPillow chief executive officer Mike Lindell explained by video that yesterday FBI agents took his phone and that “what we’ve done is weaponize the FBI…it’s disgusting….” Agents executed the search warrant as part of a federal investigation into the alleged breach of Colorado voting machines. 

We have seen it in Jeffrey Clark’s response today to ethics charges brought against him by the D.C. Bar. Clark was employed by the Department of Justice in late 2020, when he worked to swing the department behind Trump’s lie that he had won the election, a shift that would have utterly destroyed the rule of law in the U.S. Now he claims the D.C. Bar cannot punish him because normal rules of behavior don’t apply. In a filing today, he told the bar: “[T]the President has an absolute right to seek legal and other forms of advice…and officers of the United States have an absolute duty and corresponding privilege to provide their opinions on a confidential basis.”

The turning of the courts into a tool for partisan advantage has been part of the Republican project since 1986, when Reagan’s attorney general Edwin Meese vowed to “institutionalize the Reagan revolution so it can’t be set aside no matter what happens in future presidential elections.” That partisan use of the courts inspired then–Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to help Trump replace about 30% of the federal bench and to swing the Supreme Court to the far right with three new justices.

An examination by Politico’s Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney shows that Trump’s judges were less experienced on the bench and had spent more time in politics than the judges appointed by other presidents, and that Trump expected them to side with him, calling them “my judges.” “If it’s my judges, you know how they’re gonna decide,” he told evangelical leaders in 2016. And some of them have, indeed, sided with the former president in surprising ways, most recently when Judge Aileen Cannon, confirmed after Trump lost the 2020 election, agreed with his request for a special master to review the government documents recovered by the government from Mar-a-Lago.

Trump’s judges have revealed a willingness to break precedent to achieve political ends, and nowhere is that clearer than in the willingness of the Supreme Court to replace long-settled law with their own preferences, most notably in their Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision protecting the right to abortion, but also in West Virginia v. EPA, limiting Congress’s ability to delegate regulatory authority to agencies, and so on. 

That replacement of settled law with what looks to be political preferences has tanked popular faith in the Supreme Court. On Monday, Justice Elena Kagan noted that, ​​“Judges create legitimacy problems for themselves…when they instead stray into places where it looks like they’re an extension of the political process or when they’re imposing their own personal preferences.” People should be able to expect that “changes in personnel don’t send the entire legal system up for grabs.” 

President Joe Biden appears to be trying to restore the rule of law to the Department of Justice, going out of his way to note that he is not involved with Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decisions. Increasingly, it looks like Garland’s Justice Department is bearing down on those who considered themselves untouchable. 

The trials and convictions of those who participated in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol continue. Yesterday, three more rioters were found guilty of multiple charges. Twenty-five year old Patrick McCaughey III, of Ridgefield, Connecticut, who crushed Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges in a doorway, faces decades in prison. 

 Also today,  Pamela Brown, Evan Perez, Jeremy Herb, and Kristen Holmes reported at CNN that not all of Trump’s loyalists are still acting as if they are above the law. Trump’s White House chief of staff Mark Meadows has complied with a Department of Justice subpoena.

Perhaps most revealing of the restoration of the rule of law at the Justice Department is that former attorney general Barr has been on the television circuit defending the FBI and Biden’s Department of Justice from Trump’s fury over the FBI’s execution of a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago that yielded documents—or empty folders—bearing the highest classified markings. That is, the same man who sponsored Durham’s political mission has recently begun to speak up for the rule of law.

(NOTE - I don't buy Barr's "Rehab Tour"  he is guilty as Old Wack Donald!!)

[96thdayofrage]

In 1992, a little less than a year into his new job, Attorney General William P. Barr added to the zeitgeist of “tough-on-crime” policies when he issued the Bush administration’s “24 Recommendations to Strengthen Criminal Justice.” Barr’s harsh approach, which included expanding capacity for pretrial detention and offsetting the cost of such expansion with the labor of prisoners, was distilled by the Office of Policy and Communication and given an unequivocal title, “The Case for More Incarceration.” At the time, there were about 850,000 people incarcerated across America’s state and federal prisons — the highest number to that point.

With Barr’s confirmation hearings for attorney general scheduled for next week, his writings on criminal justice deserve careful scrutiny from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, especially as the nation increasingly rejects policies that led to the current crisis of mass incarceration. Barr was an ardent champion of policies that have transformed America into the world’s leading incarcerator, and there’s little reason to believe that his opinions have changed. The Senate Judiciary Committee must inquire as to whether he still believes that prison expansion is the best response to crime.  

Barr’s thesis in “The Case for More Incarceration” wasn’t subtle: “There is no better way to reduce crime than to identify, target, and incapacitate those hardened criminals who commit staggering numbers of violent crimes whenever they are on the streets.” Barr blamed “a small group of hardened, chronic offenders” and “violent predators” for America’s pain.

“Too many violent criminals are sentenced to probation with minimal supervision,” Barr wrote in the introduction to the report. “Too many violent criminals are sentenced to prison but are released early on parole or simply to relieve the pressure of prison crowding. None of us is naive enough to think that these criminals will suddenly become upstanding, law-abiding citizens upon release.”

He distilled the essence of his prescription to three simple points: “First, prisons work. Second, we need more of them. Third, inadequate prison space costs money.” For Barr, mass incarceration had no negative effects — “the most common objections to incarceration do not hold up to scrutiny.”

And a failure to incarcerate, he argued, will only cost the nation in tax revenue, jobs, and property value. He then suggested a simple solution — cutting the use of parole and probation as a crime-reducing measure because individuals who benefit from such arrangements of release commit “avertable crimes.”

These views have long been rejected by scientific research, and a bipartisan consensus has formed that America’s prison population is far too large. But Barr seems captured in the very reflexive “tough-on-crime” politics that so many others have rejected as naïve, costly, and inhumane. 

In 2014, the National Research Council refuted the analysis that high incarceration rates reduce crime. It found that most studies estimated the “crime-reducing effect of incarceration to be small,” and instead, recognized the astronomical expansion of incarceration to have an “uncertain” correlation to crime reduction. Given the magnitude of American incarceration, the impact on such policies on crime reduction “was unlikely to have been large.”

The report also found that harsh policies propel the expansion of incarceration by mandating longer sentences that have little preventative utility and can instead “have the effect of increasing post-release criminality.” The NRC also found that when it comes to crime reduction, the “incremental deterrent effect of increases in lengthy prison sentences is modest at best,” and that “overreliance on the severity of punishment” has not been proven to be good crime-reduction policy.  

In the last 40 years, the amount of people held in prisons and jails has increased by 500 percent. Since 1991, when Barr first took office as attorney general, America’s incarcerated population has nearly tripled. This increase is a consequence of a myriad of policies, many of which Barr advocated, such as expanding the use of pretrial detention in local jails.

Between 1993 and 2008, the jail population increased from 223,568 to 472,607 people. According to the Prison Policy Institute, this increase is “driven by the rise of pre-trial detention and in the holding of people for other agencies.” Many of these people have not been convicted of a crime and remain detained because they are too poor to pay for release. In 2017, Human Rights Watch found that in California, at least 63 percent of people in county jails “have not been sentenced, but are serving time because they cannot afford to pay bail.” Furthermore, in federal prison, the increase in the overall population is not largely violent offenders, as Barr would suggest, but “lower-rate and lower-level offenders.”

Twenty-eight years ago, Barr’s tough-on-crime attitude was revered by the Senate, and he was swiftly confirmed. Today, many Americans and an increasing number of members of Congress see it for what it is: an unduly harsh and counterproductive waste of resources and human potential that disproportionately damages the most vulnerable communities in America.

In recent years, many states and the federal government have responded by taking measures to reduce criminal sentences and incarceration as well as make the system fairer. Louisiana, Arkansas, Michigan, and Hawaii, for example, have expanded probation eligibility to steer offenders away from prison in the first place, while Connecticut, Michigan, Mississippi, Rhode Island, and South Caroline have all reduced their incarcerated populations between 14 and 25 percent in the past decade. And last month, Congress passed and President Trump signed the First Step Act, which, among its many modest reforms, allows judges discretion to reject mandatory minimums for drug offenses.

Voters have also made their voices heard at the ballot box, too, approving more criminal justice reforms during the midterms. In Florida, which was one of four states that permanently barred former felons from voting, voters restored the franchise to approximately 1.4 million people, and in Louisiana, voters finally ended the practice of non-unanimous juries. Voters also rejected the war on marijuana. In Michigan, voters approved recreational use of marijuana, while Oklahoma, Missouri, and Utah approved medical marijuana use. 

As the country embraces criminal justice reform and seeks an end to mass incarceration, the Senate Judiciary Committee must determine if Barr is still the same champion of mass incarceration that he was a quarter-century ago. As the committee prepares to question Barr on his record, it should reaffirm a commitment to reform or face the political consequences.

[bellacollinavictims]

WHY THE FLORIDA BAR STILL ALLOWS DWIGHT SCHAR’S CORRUPT ATTORNEY MARC RANDAZZA TO PRACTICE LAW Attorney Marc Randazza, who was fired by InfoWars’ Alex Jones because a Connecticut judge accused him of “serious misconduct,” is Ryan Homes and NVR Inc., founder Dwight Schar’s attorney. Dwight Schar also chose a corrupt attorney Marc Randazza to represent his Bella Collina in Florida. Randazza has been disciplined by the state bars in four out of the five states he is licensed to practice law. Yet The Florida Bar, President Dori Foster-Morales, Executive Director Joshua E. Doyle, and President-elect Michael G. Tanner, still allow “tainted” Randazza to practice. The Florida Bar Publicly Reprimands Randazza Randazza was issued a public reprimand by The Florida Bar on Sept. 3, 2020 DISCIPLINE CASE #201500718 against Marc Randazza. The reprimand was related to his ethical violations in Nevada, where Randazza, as a porn attorney, was sued by the State Bar of Nevada on nine charges of violations. These violations were:

Communication,

Conflict of Interest: Current Clients,

Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules,

Imputation of Conflicts of Interest,

Safekeeping Property,

Declining or Terminating Representation, 

Advisor,

Restrictions on Right to Practice,

Misconduct.

Marc Randazza GUILTY of Bribery & Shady LoanHe pled guilty to two of the ethical violations: the bribe and the shady loan.

He pled guilty to two of the ethical violations: the bribe and the shady loan.

Randazza (Randazza Legal Group) received a 12 month suspension, but was it enforced? The Florida Bar decided to reprimand Randazza by placing him on a year’s probation. The Referee’s note said that he “did not find persuasive the numerous character letters submitted by the respondent nor the testimony of his character witnesses, who were unfamiliar with the facts surrounding his discipline.” In other words, Randazza tried to cover up the facts with recommendations. Find out more on: https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/why-the-florida-bar-still-allows-corrupt-marc-randazza-to-practice-law https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/why-the-florida-bar-still-allows-corrupt-marc-randazza-to-practice-law