#pro-migrants NGOs
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Anybody who works for a 'non-profit' or an NGO is someone I make a point to avoid.
NGOs are grifters, criminal organizations wishing for issues they claim they want to solve to continue ad vitam aeternam. Because solving them would mean they're out of jobs.
It's a business, nothing more. Humanitarians are the most fucked up, unstable, adrenalin junkie people, hopping from one failed country to another. Honestly it's the same with international correspondents covering conflicts all over the world. The type of person who is drawn to that kind of highly dangerous, unstable lifestyle isn't someone who is healthy or sane.
The money you donate goes towards paying the wages of the CEOs to fund their lavish lifestyle. 'Humanitarian' orgs are deeply corrupt. Human Rights Watch receives money from Qatar for instance.
#pro-migrants NGOs#are straight up criminals hell bent on destroying the middle class and replacing it with a class of serfs happy to lick off crumbs#there may be some people who are genuine but they always end up quitting#Médecins sans frontières is absolute trash#so is Amnesty International#still refusing to call Hamas a terrorist organization
1 note
·
View note
Text
Poland’s parliament has approved controversial proposals to decriminalise in certain circumstances the use of firearms by border guards in self-defence.
NGOs say the legal changes contravene human rights standards, but the government says they are needed to protect Poland’s border with Belarus from increasingly aggressive gangs of migrants.
Last month, a 21-year-old soldier died after he was stabbed trying to prevent migrants enter the country illegally.
Warsaw accuses Belarus of encouraging Asian and African migrants to enter Poland illegally to destabilise the European Union.
Poland’s new pro-EU government had promised a more humanitarian approach to the migrant crisis.
Instead, following the soldier’s stabbing, it re-established a temporary border exclusion zone that hinders public oversight because journalists and NGOs must request passes to enter the area.[...]
Many reacted angrily last month when the media revealed that three soldiers patrolling the border had been detained and handcuffed after they fired more than forty warning shots towards a group of migrants who were breaking through the border fence.
Shortly afterwards, Mr Tusk announced plans to re-introduce the exclusion zone banning unauthorised people to enter part of the border and change the law on the use of firearms.
Mr O’Flaherty appealed in a separate letter to Mr Tusk to stop the practice of migrant pushbacks, saying 7,317 people had been summarily returned to Belarus, in some cases after they had requested asylum in Poland, between December 2023 and June 2024.[...]
NGOs estimate 130 migrants have died in the border zone in Belarus and its three EU neighbours, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia in the last three years, many succumbing to exposure in sub-zero temperatures or drowning in marshy areas.
26 Jul 24
90 notes
·
View notes
Text
Poland’s parliament has approved controversial proposals to decriminalise in certain circumstances the use of firearms by border guards in self-defence.
-
Last month, a 21-year-old soldier died after he was stabbed trying to prevent migrants enter the country illegally.
- Poland’s new pro-EU government had promised a more humanitarian approach to the migrant crisis. Instead, following the soldier’s stabbing, it re-established a temporary border exclusion zone that hinders public oversight because journalists and NGOs must request passes to enter the area.
-
Mr Duszczyk said officers would only be exempt from criminal liability if they use their weapons in response to a direct assault to protect colleagues’ lives. “I would like to resolve any doubts about the excessive nature of these provisions,” he wrote in response to concerns raised by the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O’Flaherty. Mr O’Flaherty and other human rights’ organisations urged MPs to reject the proposals saying they contravene human rights’ standards. He said the new rules may remove the disincentive for border patrols to use excessive force. “It may also lead to a situation where the circumstances in which the arbitrary use of force or firearms by state agents may result in the loss of life or bodily harm are not properly investigated, particularly in cases where the victims are on the other side of the border,” he wrote in a letter to the Polish authorities.
-
Mr O’Flaherty appealed in a separate letter to Mr Tusk to stop the practice of migrant pushbacks, saying 7,317 people had been summarily returned to Belarus, in some cases after they had requested asylum in Poland, between December 2023 and June 2024.
-
NGOs estimate 130 migrants have died in the border zone in Belarus and its three EU neighbours, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia in the last three years, many succumbing to exposure in sub-zero temperatures or drowning in marshy areas.
0 notes
Text
The Ukraine bill slush fund also tucked in $3.5 billion to fund mass-migration NGOs.
They Hate You!
0 notes
Text
Taking Romani children away from their mothers is a strategy that's been used by many European countries since the Middle Ages. It was the law in France in the 1700s, it was done in Romania during slavery (1300s-1860s), it was one of the policies conducted by the Nazis in Germany too. Far-right parties are quickly turning into the biggest political force in Europe, as you can see from the recent European elections. FYI, for the first time in 20 years, this year, no Romani politician was elected at the European Parliament. Romani people are the largest ethnic minority in Europe and we are left without any form of political representation. What I'm saying may sound like a liberal talking point but I think not having Romani representation at the European Parliament, when fascist ideologies have been gaining so much traction on the internet, in the street and in the media, when far right parties are becoming once again one of the biggest political forces in Europe, is very ominous. This article brings some perspective:
Be that as it may, this will influence the agenda for human rights overall and the impact on minorities will be big. The work of international pro-Romani and Romani organizations will become harder. To have no Romani political representation means losing political influence. It may not seem like it, but the EP influences our lives, and without representation, minorities will have less influence on the political decision-making that directly impacts their lives, which can keep cycles of exclusion and inequality in place. It could happen that less attention will be paid to minorities and that the advocacy for the interests of the Roma will ultimately make slower progress on crucial issues influencing Romani communities. Unfortunately, the impact will not just be on minorities, but in the bigger picture will also be on the environment, for example. During the previous two electoral periods there was a special working group in the EP, established by MEP Soraya Post, with members from across party lines, called the Anti-Racism and Diversity Intergroup – ARDI. The existence of that working group was important, its members, more than 200 MEPs total, advocated for racial equality together, they fought discrimination in education and racism. Romani MEPs were mainly in the leadership of that working group. The continued existence of that group is distinctly endangered now. This electoral period will decide the budget of the EU as of 2028, and the EU Framework for Roma Policy applies just to the year 2030. The next EP elections will be held in 2029, so the preparation and adoption of that policy could be passed by the current EP. Now it will very much depend on who is going to be willing to profile herself or himself as a pro-Romani politician, with whom such politicians will be able to start cooperating and how that cooperation will work across the factions in the EP. In the past, the Romani MEPs were dispersed among different factions but collaborated quite well with each other nonetheless.
I'd like to remind everyone that there is no Romani civil rights movement in Europe. There are some grassroots organisations, there are some (usually poorly funded) associations, there are EU-backed NGOs that don't really do much, but there is no actual Romani civil rights movement. There is not, and there has never really been, anyone or any group advocating for Romani rights and achieving significant political changes. Now, with no Romani political representation, it will be even harder to fight for Romani rights against the far-right.
I'm also worried about the demographic crisis right-wing European politicians have been talking about for the past years; they are all freaking out about how the European population is declining (baby boomers are dying and women are having less babies), this rhetoric fuels a backlash against women's rights and anti-migrant policies, but I'm worried it will also be used to back anti-Romani policies. Romani people have higher birthrates and are significantly younger than other European groups. I'm worried many more far-right politicians will start pointing at the declining white-european birthrate and the growing Romani population in Europe to pass anti-Romani laws (far-right parties already target Romani communities for being "threats" to the safety of white-Europeans)
06/12/2024, Romani Mothers & Babies Face Prison Sentences or Child Removal Under Proposed New Bill in Italy
85 notes
·
View notes
Text
The New Democracy government continues to dismiss evidence of pushbacks as ‘fake news’ or ‘Turkish propaganda’, and has developed effective methods to close down discussion of the issue. The vilification of pro-migrant NGOs – a staple of far-right discourse during the Syriza years – is now a talking-point of cabinet ministers. Under new laws, such organizations are required to sign up to an official register and receive permission from the state to continue their work, which must conform to highly restrictive criteria. New Democracy has also ensured that the camps remain off-limits to the press, and so the public is prevented from seeing the horrors therein. Meanwhile, journalists who try to cover migration issues can expect a hostile backlash. When the Dutch-born reporter Ingeborg Beugel accused the Prime Minister of lying about the activities of Greek border forces, for instance, she became the target of a state-backed smear campaign. After a barrage of death threats, Beugel was forced to temporarily leave Greece on the advice of the Dutch embassy. She is now facing criminal charges for allowing an Afghan asylum seeker to lodge in her house, which could lead to a year in prison and a fine of €5,000. A similar fate befell Iason Apostolopoulos, field coordinator of the humanitarian organization Mediterranea Saving Humans, who was labelled a traitor and a Turkish agent for conducting search and rescue operations. He was targeted by a pro-government news outlet which published his personal information online. Because of this climate of fear, Greece has fallen 38 places in the Press Freedom Index over the past year: now ranking 108th, just below Burundi. Earlier this month, when the European Court of Human Rights found that the Greek Coast Guard had sunk a migrant boat in 2014, causing eleven asylum seekers to lose their lives, major news outlets simply ignored the ruling.
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
hey great blog, thank you for your work and dedication. I have been studying in bcn for 8 years, I can speak catalan but not perfectly so I get embarrassed to talk... if you haven't already, can you make a post with a list of trusted groups/NGOs that support catalan causes? Legal help to immigrants, anti-racist, anti police brutality, for equality of gender, climate change, LGBTQ+ etc. I want to participate and learn without putting myself at risk of expulsion as a foreigner.
Thank you very much!
Crida LGBTI: organization for sexual and gender liberation, with the purpose of fighting against LGBTIQ+-phobia, patriarchy and capitalism.
Òmnium Cultural: this is probably the biggest organization, they work for many different causes in Catalan society but focus on freedom of expression and thought, the right to self-determination and freedom of political prisoners, promotion of Catalan language and culture, and education. Right now they’re doing a campaign to investigate the Spanish monarchy’s corruption.
Unitat contra el feixisme i el racisme: as you can see in the name they work against fascism and racism. It’s a wide platform made of many local organizations that come together to oppose and confront right wing extremism (like Vox, but more than just that).
SOS racisme: an organization that fights against racism and xenophobia. They work to eliminate this discrimination in all its forms and all ambits of society, attend victims of racism/xenophobia, and work together with institutes of human rights of the Catalan government.
Casa nostra, casa vostra: organization that works to welcome refugees to Catalonia and other things against racism. Now they’re doing the campaign Papers per a tothom (papers for everyone) to demand regularization of immigrants (right now you’ve probably heard the news about the temporary workers who come annually from Africa to work in the fields during harvest season that are sleeping on the streets in Lleida, it’s for that people and more who could be in a similar situation).
Stop maremortum: platform to stop the deaths of migrants crossing the Mediterranean. They work raising awareness, in the judicial sphere protecting the rights of migrants, demanding political parties to make clear solutions, etc.
Tanquem els CIE: campaign to close the CIEs (internment centers of foreigners) and stop deportations.
Associació Catalana per la Pau: they do different things around the world.
Irídia: an association that works for civil and political rights in Catalonia, it’s formed by lawyers, psychologists, journalists, sociologists and more. They are mostly known because they offer free defence for victims of police brutality and human rights repression (like people who are accused of injuries against the monarchy, ““enalting terrorism”“ for a pro-independence tweet, people arrested at protests, labour rights activists, etc), but they also work to change public policy. If you become associated you give a monthly donation and participate in the general assemblies to decide where to direct efforts next.
Fridays for Future Barcelona
while looking for f4f I found this website for being a volunteer in different wildlife and nature projects. I don’t personally know the organizations of this website though, but they’re legit.
You can also look for your local food bank and the unions for your job (or if you’re a student there are too). Most unions also have specific sectors for specific causes (women, LGBTIQA+, migrants).
And depending on your politicial affiliation, there’s other organizations that work on a wider range of topics. I don’t know your age or anything else, but for example La Forja (the youth organization) and Poble Lliure (the non-youth organization), or Arran (youth) and Endavant (not youth), or Jovent Republicà or many others work on all those topics from different approaches.
If you are pro-independence, I recommend you look for your local CDR. It’s the horizontal assemblies of towns or quarters that work on so much more than just for independence and against monarchy. They’re very left-wing and all social causes are considered important in creating a new society.
These are the ones I could think of that are well-known and respected nation-wide, but most importantly there are a lot of local associations for each town or quarter (for example, there’s a list of associations that collaborate in the platform against sexist violence Plataforma Unitària contra la Violència de Gènere and you can see a lot of organizations of each quarter of Barcelona and other cities).
I don’t think you would be at risk of expulsion for being a foreigner in any of these organizations nor in left-wing organizations in general. I hope you didn’t say that because of you experienced it 😔
Lastly, since we’re talking about NGOs and volunteering, maybe you’d be interested in Voluntariat per la Llengua. It’s a volunteer programme organized by Plataforma per la Llengua (NGO that works to defend Catalan and Aranese languages) that pairs together a native Catalan speaker (or someone who has lived here for a long time and speaks very well) with someone who is learning the language, most often immigrants, so they can practise together.
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
This is my favourite sign from a pro refugee protest I went to a few years back. The U.K. government has responded to its repeated mistakes during covid by re-directing hate on to migrants and refugees. Don’t forget that migrants and refugees add more to our society than they take. Migrants from the Caribbean and Asia in particular built our NHS and continue to make up a huge part of the workforce. And most refugees in the U.K. over the last year have been from Iran, whose crisis we were involved in creating and we hold a moral responsibility for. Support the incredible Help Refugees who were leading the work on the ground impeccably when I went to Calais - while international NGOs were nowhere to be found - and complain to the BBC and Sky News for their dehumanising coverage of refugees in recent weeks.
11 notes
·
View notes
Photo
JACOBIN MAGAZINE
After twelve years of the “war on drugs” in Mexico, a period when almost 260,000 were murdered and at least 37,000 disappeared, a new government has arrived with refreshing ideas about drugs, peace, and security. The new president Andrés Manuel López Obrador has promised to promote a pacification policy including conversations on justice and reconciliation, amnesty for minor offenders, and the decriminalization of marijuana and poppy crops.
His program goes against the grain of mainstream narratives, which still depict an anachronistic image of 1980s-era drug cartels as the main source of violence in Mexico. Hit shows like Narcos portray megalomaniac narco-traffickers singlehandedly terrorizing whole countries, fueled by the North’s insatiable appetite for drugs.
AMLO recognizes that a policy of confrontation against organized crime is not enough to address the violence in the country and proposes to tackle its deep causes, promoting education and work alternatives to youth and rural communities depending on illicit activities.
Most researchers in Mexico argue that it is the state’s militarization that has escalated and preserved violence in Mexico. Researchers like Guadalupe Correa, Dawn Paley, and Oswaldo Zavala, point out that outbreaks of violence in a region tend to be triggered by the deployment of soldiers — tens of thousands of which have participated in Mexico’s internal security affairs since 2006. The US-funded drug war only encouraged cartels to buy more guns, recruit more soldiers, and fight dirtier.
But these researchers point out something else: that the cartels no longer rely primarily on the drug trade for profit. Mexico’s criminal syndicates grew into complex, militarized organizations just as the country’s economy was opened up to international capital in the 1990s and early 2000s. This revealed new, lucrative frontiers off which they could parasitize.
Today, the country’s heavily armed criminal networks don’t limit themselves to drug trafficking. They also profit from migrant smuggling, fuel theft, iron ore exports, extortion, illicit logging, or kidnapping for ransom in addition to drug trafficking.
But what they’ve come to specialize in beyond any one profit stream is territorial occupation, through which they attempt to control all economic activity, both legal and illegal, within a certain area. Under this model, it’s rational for them to battle for control over areas richest in profitable natural resources, and position themselves accordingly towards the international capital these areas have been opened to. This is evident in the fact that territories hit by crime and extreme violence, such as Juarez Valley or the Tamaulipas border state, are usually the ones richest in hydrocarbons and mineral resources.
Authors like Paley and Correa argue that, in light of these factors, the extreme violence in several Mexican regions actually benefits some actors in transnational capital, particularly the energy, hydrocarbons, mining, private security, finance, and arms trade sectors.
One reason is that forced displacement caused by conflicts enables the occupation and buying of lands — even communal ones or ejidos, a Mexican collective form of land ownership that does not allow selling terrains — at low prices and avoids local resistance to extractive developments. According to the last annual report of the Comisión Mexicana de Derechos Humanos — an independent Mexican NGO — the cumulative figures of internally displaced people were at least 329,917 by the end of 2017.
This is not to say that there was any planned, centralized effort to use the drug war to open up sections of Mexico to transnational extraction. The course of the war has been too chaotic, with too many shifting actors, to make this conclusion. However, that neoliberal restructuring occurred simultaneously with the increasing paramilitarization and sophistication of both “sides” of the drug war produced a dangerous outcome.
Now, sections of international capital are codependent with the violence of Mexico’s narco-state — and its ability to displace, terrorize, and monopolize territories — to achieve its agenda. And capital’s collaboration with criminal paramilitaries, who exist on a spectrum with the corrupt state, has increased their sophistication and entrenchment within the Mexican economy.
This means that to confront Mexico’s endemic violence and transform its security framework, AMLO will have to do more than reform drug policies. He will also have to take on international capital.
The War on Drugs
In December 2006, Felipe Calderón took office as the president of Mexico. Days later he announced the Joint Operation Michoacán, named after his home state. It was a coordinated effort of the army, the Mexican Naval Infantry, and the Federal Police to attack organized crime and drug trafficking. It was a move by a president with little legitimacy in the need of an internal enemy — he won office by only 0.62 percent, narrowly defeating the current president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who claimed electoral fraud. According to many, it was the foundational event of Mexico’s “war on drugs.”
With that confrontation policy, Calderón intended to tackle the drug cartels and reestablish security in the country. Instead, the homicide rate doubled during his six-year tenure. Tens of thousands of soldiers were deployed over the country to perform internal security tasks. Other than the surge in troops, there was no significant strategic shift between Calderón’s and outgoing president Peña Nieto’s security policy.
In 2007, George Bush and Felipe Calderón signed the framework agreement for Mérida Initiative, named after the city where the meeting took place. Inspired by the Plan Colombia — a US aid package to fight both drug trafficking and left-wing guerrillas signed in 2000 — the Merida Initiative committed millions of US dollars towards counter-narcotics, counter-terrorism, and border security; public security and law enforcement, including technology and training; and institution building. The Department of State delivered $400 million in 2008 alone.
According to Dawn Paley and her book Drug War Capitalism, the US-Mexican cooperation on institution building under Mérida Initiative and other programs sponsored by USAID had a key role in boosting neoliberal and pro-business structural reforms in Mexico. During his tenure, the outgoing president Enrique Peña Nieto pursued structural reforms including constitutional changes in education, banking, the judiciary, energy, and the tax system.
Institutional changes run parallel to extreme violence in several territories of the country far beyond the traditional corridors of drug production and trafficking. The “drug war,” consisting in the military and other federal forces performing police tasks in urban environments, as well as controlling rural territory, failed to stop violence. The initial strategy of beheading criminal organizations contributed to their division and further diversification into more illegal activities, boosting conflicts among criminal syndicates and violence against the population. Military repression also triggered the adoption of military tactics and heavy weaponry among criminal organizations.
(Continue Reading)
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
News on Countries of Asylum
Global
Eric Kaufmann: A proposal of closed permanent refugee camps on Western soil
The creeping criminalisation of humanitarian aid
Africa
BOTSWANA: High court ruling decriminalising same sex practices is promising
KENYA:
For the children of Dadaab refugee camp education is still limited
LGBT+ refugees in Kenya slums face homophobic attacks and evictions
UGANDA:
Kabale parish faced with 120 Rwandan asylum seekers
DGF donors freeze funding for NGOs after audit uncovered widespread corruption
Americas
COLOMBIA: Awareness-raising campaign seeks to protect Venezuelan migrants from trafficking and smuggling networks
ECUADOR: Colombian refugees stage weeks-long protests in Quito against UNHCR
MEXICO: For Central American asylum seekers it is better to stay in Mexico than return home
USA:
USCIS director tells asylum officers to stop allowing people in at initial border screening
Increasing numbers of Cubans trying to enter US through Mexico
How migrant families separated at the border could make US government pay
Trump cuts off aid to Central American countries over migrants
Asia
BANGLADESH: The novel approach to reach refugees: Speak Rohinya
Europe
Growing sanctuary efforts to assist migrants by churches in Europe
EU Summit must give effective answers to migrant issues
Legal submission to ICC calls for prosecution of EU over migrant deaths
UNHCR warns of “sea of blood” unless rescue vessels are deployed to rescue migrant boats
MSF: EU policies continue to claim migrant lives on the Mediterranean Sea
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: Local authorities relocate refugees to areas where landmines remain
FRANCE:
Imam jailed for selling dinghies for migrants to cross the Channel
Record refugee convictions near Calais aiming to halt Channel crossings
GERMANY: German politicians stand up for refugees who receive death threats
GREECE:
At least seven people drowned after boat goes down on the Greek coast
Refugee integration in Greece against the backdrop of a weak economy.
Why the Greek reception system failed to provide sustainable solutions
HUNGARY: New police department takes over asylum and immigration related tasks
IRELAND: Ireland’s strange and cruel reception system for asylum seekers
ITALY:
Domenico Lucano, former mayor of pro-migrant Riace, stands trial
Italian government passes law to fine those who rescue refugees at sea
How the Italian mafia makes millions by exploiting migrant workers
SPAIN: Spanish rescue service saves 292 lives in the Strait of Gibraltar
UNITED KINGDOM:
Campaigners call for the UK to accept 10,000 child refugees
Discredited language test used on two in five Syrian asylum seekers in the UK
Middle East
LEBANON:
More than half of refugee girls in Beirut risk sexual violence, says report
Lebanese authorities order Syrian refugees to demolish their makeshift homes
Lebanese government denies forcing Syrian refugees back home
Thousands of Syrian refugees could be sent back, says Lebanese minister Bassil
Syrian refugees forced to evacuate camp after tensions
1 note
·
View note
Link
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Strasbourg Luc Ravel has called attention to the demographic shift in France saying Muslims are having far more children than native French and slammed the widespread “promotion” of abortion.
The Archbishop of Strasbourg went against the grain of Church leaders in France who have largely remained politically correct on the issue of demographic changes occurring in the country. He said the rising birth rate of Muslims in France was leading to what prolific French writer Renaud Camus has termed “the Great Replacement”, French conservative magazine Valeurs Actuelles reports.
“Muslim believers know very well that their birthrate is such that today, they call it … the Great Replacement, they tell you in a very calm, very positive way that, ‘one day all this, it will be ours’,” he said.
The concept of the Great Replacement was coined in 2010 in a speech given by Camus and then later in his 2011 political book, The Great Replacement. Camus defined the Great Replacement as the transition of a society, often through mass migration, in a few generations in which the names of places remain the same but the people and their values totally change.
Camus called the current mass migration policies in Europe the biggest shift in peoples and their values since the barbarian invasions in the third century which led to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire.
In recent years, the term has become more commonplace in French political dialogue. Many in the anti-mass migration Front National have adopted the term as well as conservatives like Gaullist politician Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, who allied with FN leader Marine Le Pen during the presidential campaign.
Mayor of Béziers Robert Ménard also used the term earlier this year when referring to the high number of Muslim students in the city’s schools. A court fined Mayor Ménard 2,000 euros for his comments after finding him guilty of “hate speech”.
The anti-mass migration Identitarian youth movement is also an advocate of Camus’ theory and uses it as a basis for their rejection of the open borders policies of those on the left. The group, known for their often spectacular protest actions, are currently organising their own search and rescue (SAR) mission in the Mediterranean Sea labelled “Defend Europe” where they say they will work with the Libyan coastguard to monitor migrant rescue NGOs.
The pro-migrant NGOs have been accused by Italian prosecutors of conspiring with people smugglers and the Identitarians say they will use their own ship to track the NGOs and document any evidence of collusion with the smugglers.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Illegal African migrants mostly males and pro-migrant NGOs occupy refuge center of ukranians mostly women, children and elderly in france. Ukranians was forced to leave the facility. Enjoy 9gag is going to delete this.
Illegal African migrants mostly males and pro-migrant NGOs occupy refuge center of ukranians mostly women, children and elderly in france. Ukranians was forced to leave the facility. Enjoy 9gag is going to delete this.
Tags: Latest News, france, ukraine, africa 7280 points, 1050 comments. Source link
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
The EU ignores neutrality, provides funding to undermine political foes
Countries in the EU are theoretically bound to the neutrality obligation in its use of tax revenues: The taxpayer's money must not be used for political purposes. But just as the German government wants to spend 1 billion euros in the next four years on the so-called “fight against the right”, the EU is funding a network of “civil society” NGOs that represent clearly left-wing politics, actively combatting conservative politicians and their parties – Matteo Salvini and Viktor Orban are but two examples.
Published: January 23, 2021, 9:39 am
Read more
'Extremists use schools to pervert UK education'
'Accusations of racism is the ideological weapon of globalists'
'EU governments participating in mass-scale human trafficking'
'Conspiracy theory' on fluoride proven right
'Progressive' multinational exploiting children in Turkey
'Floating protection systems' against illegal immigrants
'Italians, we will cut your throats'
Share
Tweet
“In view of the current economic plight of many citizens in Germany and the EU, every taxpayer must be appalled that the EU is spending all our money on so-called ‘civil society’ NGOs that promote illegal migration and ‘no borders’ and undermine conservative EU governments want,” said the rapporteur for the budget of the Commission for the year 2019 Joachim Kuhs from the Identity and Democracy Group in the European Parliament. “This is infidelity and must be stopped immediately.”
The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), the pioneer of these “civil society” NGOs in Europe, received €29 930 from the EU in 2019 for a project on “European sovereignty”. ECFR is one of the most important lobbyists in Brussels and has a great influence on EU politics. So the EU pays ECFR to lobby the EU.
At the same time, however, the EU intervenes in the “sovereignty” of member states such as Hungary and Poland through NGOs such as the ECFR. In order to create transparency about the influence of foreign NGOs in Hungary, the Hungarian parliament passed a law based on the Israeli model in 2017, according to which NGOs have to disclose their funding. This transparency law was found to be “discriminatory” in 2020 by the European Court of Justice . The Hungarian government wants however to continue to insist on transparency in the financing of NGOs.
The command center of the left-wing human rights organizations in Hungary is the “Hungarian Civil Liberties Union” (HCLU), which in 2019 received €17 847 from the EU for “voter motivation campaigns” according to the EU financial transparency portal. The HCLU received $50 000 from the Open Society Foundation in 2018 and $365 500 in 2016.
The HCLU, along with other NGOs, belongs to the “Civil Liberties Union for Europe” (LibertiesEU) based in Berlin, which was funded by the Open Society in 2017 to the tune of $2 550 000. According to the Jerusalem Post on March 15, 2018, the head of LibertiesEU Balázs Dénes boasted:
“We are very strong. This week I am meeting with a think tank, a lobby group that has influence on the German government and the German Foreign Ministry, and I bring them copies of the law (the NGO Transparency Act) that have been translated from Hungarian and will explain to them what they can do against it.”
The members of LibertiesEU also enjoyed generous funding from the EU in 2019: the Civil Rights Defenders (Sweden) received €81 363, Center for Peace Studies (Croatia) €267 392, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Finland) €38 118, Nederlands Juristen Comite voor de Mensenrechte €96 617, Irish Council for Civil Liberties €56 928, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Poland) €38 118, Estonian Human Rights Center €129 691, Lithuanian Center for Human Rights €157 493, and the Mirovni Institute Slovenia €281 797.
From Italy, the NGOs Associazione Antigone received €172 832 and Coalizione Italiana per le Liberta e Diritii e Civili (CILD) €88 379. The Italian Coalition for Freedom and Human Rights CILD, founded in 2014, is a large network of NGOs that campaign for illegal immigration and complain against the Italian government when it tries to protect its borders.
These include the Lawfare NGOs Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione (ASGI) and A Buon Diritto, which, among other things, took legal action before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) tried to deprive Italy of the right to reject illegal immigrants at the border. Since then, border protection has been referred to in the mainstream press in Europe as “illegal pushbacks”, even though the protection of external borders is part and prerequisite of the Schengen Agreement.
The European Center for Law & Justice (ECLJ) documented in February 2020 that 22 of the 100 judges at the ECHR were former employees of Open Society NGOs. The CILD network also includes the left-wing community network Associazione Ricreativa e Culturale Italiana (ARCI), which is currently trying to bring the former Italian interior minister Matteo Salvini to trial for alleged “deprivation of liberty”. ARCI and its sub-organizations received €967 298 from the EU in 2019.
The Italian NGO network, which is suing Italy and Salvini for wanting to impose their “No Borders” policy, is also funded by the Open Society: ASGI received in 2018 according to their website $385 715, CILD received $2 016 575 000 and ARCI received large amounts from 2016 to 2018 from Open Society.
In 2019, at least €25 243 412 went to NGOs that were directly linked to the Open Society Foundation. These so-called “human rights groups” finance projects to “mobilize voters” against unwelcome conservative governments, against “propaganda and hate speech in the Balkans” or for “no borders” lawfare and the rights of illegal migrants.
“I am not aware of the EU financing conservative or pro-Israel human rights groups, for example against anti-fascist terror and violence against conservative politicians and parties, against state censorship on the Internet and the suppression of alternative media, for politically persecuted critics of Islam, for border protection and against illegal migration, or against Islamization and Islamist violence against women, gays, Christians and Jews,” said Joachim Kuhs. “The EU has to behave politically neutral, and not to abuse the tax millions of the citizens for left-wing NGOs.”
All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Fascist boat against sea rescue has been rescued at sea
The boat that went to the mediterranean to ‘disrupt rescue missions’ has been rescued at sea - by a group dedicated to refugee rescue at sea.
Defend Europe, an offshoot of the white nationalist Identitarian movement, crowdfunded the ship ‘C-Star’ last spring with claims it would target NGO’s that try to rescue refugees.
C-Star entered the mediterranean on 15 July 2017 and has been on it’s mission for less than a month. Late July it met it’s first obstacle within that same month when it’s ship was held and it’s crew detained on charges of human smuggling.
Today, on August 11th, 2017, C-Star’s engine broke down and it send out a distress call. EU naval forces in the area passed on this distress call to Sea-Eye, a German volunteer run ship dedicated to rescuing refugees at sea.
Sea-Eye came to C-Star’s aid, reporting “To help in distressed persons is the duty of everyone who is at sea - indifferent to their origin, skin color, religion or spirit.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/11/anti-immigrant-defend-europe-vessel-has-rescued-mediterranean/
http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2017/08/11/le-bateau-anti-migrants-c-star-secouru-par-une-ong-pro-refugies_a_23074496/
http://www.ankaradegillefkosa.org/the-anti-refugee-boat-is-involved-in-human-smuggling/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/27/anti-migrant-boat-crew-arrested-famagusta-cyprus-people-smuggling
This is the funniest news ever.
872 notes
·
View notes
Text
IMPACT OF LOCKDOWN 4.0 IN INDIA
While the whole world is busy in fighting this deadly virus with no vaccine made yet, lockdown all over seems to be the sole and right method to cope up with the deadly COVID-19.
In the recent advisory issued by the Ministry of home affairs, the nationwide lockdown has once again been extended by 2 weeks till May 31. This edition of the lockdown is a bit different from the last 3 lockdowns which we have witnessed since March 23, 2020. As, the government has taken many steps not just to fight this invisible enemy, but also to resume the locked economy.
This virus hasn’t just been a global health crisis, but also an economic crisis, as even the most developed of the economies have failed to reduce its effect. Talking in the context of a developing and populous country like India, the situations would have been more grave and serious had the government not taken the right decision of declaring the nationwide lockdown on time.
However, despite the early measures been taken by the government this virus doesn’t seem to get weaker any soon. It’s so severe that people are facing a lot of problems in their day-to-day life, especially the migrant workers who are stuck at the places where they had been to work before this pandemic, they have no money left for them, many have lost their jobs, many are heading their hometowns either on foot or on bicycles, which is very heart-breaking to see, yet the governments seem to be taking no proper steps to ensure their safe and convenient journey.
In the latest lockdown 4.0, the areas across the country have been divided into three zones i.e. “green zones” where the contamination or the cases are quite less or nil followed by the “orange zone” where no new case has been reported from the last 14 days and then followed by the “red zones” which have buffer zones and containment zones in it. The economic activities have been opened to some extent in the former two like – transportation(taking care of social distancing), the opening of shops, e-commerce activities, etc. while there is still a no for the metro, rail, airways, salons, gyms, etc.
However, the government has recently announced an economic package worth of 20 lacs crore, it will still take time for the economy to get back to normal.
Though the cons, in this case, are more than the pros, nevertheless we still have some things to cheer for in this hard time, as this lockdown has brought us more closer towards each other, we have got and still have ample time for our hobbies and other skill enhancement avenues, in this lockdown, we have also understood the real meaning of being a true warrior, as our Corona warriors – the doctors, police, administration, NGOs despite having so many challenges are not giving up.
There’s still a long way to go, but one day we will win over this invisible enemy, as Simon Sinek has said ‘Panic causes tunnel vision. Calm acceptance of danger allows us to more easily assess the situation and see the options.
0 notes
Text
#MiercolesDeMigrantes y MexicoBorder
Since the begging of the 2000′s and the “Tech” era, terms as Digital diplomacy, E-Diplomacy, and Cyber Diplomacy (DiploFundation 2016) had been used to refer to any foreign affairs communications to the public, or between States that involves using new platforms in social media to deliver it.
Yesterday the current USA administration (one more time) took a massive step in applying Digital Diplomacy to show how an historic interconnection between countries can be shut down with a simple tweet without further explanation.
Mexico-US Border, Since 1848, with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, 55% Mexico’s territory was officially US soil (History 2019) and since Nixon’s Administration in 1969 we haven’t seen this type of action (Noah 2019) shutting down the border it’s only increasing damage in, and already reckless mental health crisis in both countries, this action will hit more the rising unemployment numbers, the cost of fruits and vegetables in the States is going to rise badly and more tension between population it’s setting the mood to keep fighting irrationally.
Of course, the pandemic is real, the number of cases of people infected with COVID in the US and around the world keeps increasing and we are only having hopes for a vaccine during the summer of next year.
Oil prices went down, unemployment it’s up, the economy in every part of the world is (once faster than the others) sinking, academia and policy planning are doing debates and research about the consequences in every aspect of how this COVID is setting a footprint for the upcoming months and how the workforce it’s going to take a hard shift.
In Nuevo Laredo Tamaulipas, the business has dropped 80 to 90% (Burnett 2020) so for the rest of the border area the perspectives are similar, in the US case, according to Washington Office on Latin America Three-quarters of the money paying for the Border-wall, it was obtained by raiding the defense budget: $13.9 billion that right now could be paying for a host of more urgent emergency need (WOLA 2020) – adding to that the same organization calculates the cost of military troops deployed in the border area means this- maintaining 5,000 troops both at the border and in a ready state at their bases has cost over $500 million since October 2018. (WOLA 2020)
I agree with the fact that governments (International, Federal and local) are responsible to fix the problems, but here is the question, what we can do to demand action? What we can do to turn the heads and look in the flesh the problems they are generating. From my point of view here it is a small list of recommendations.
1. Problem: Border shut down / Level of Government: Federal & International social demand: Open borders and take back essential business.
Strong recommendation: Stop politized everything and play fair, people come first, political issues must come last
Proposition: Take back essential workers (travels) and relocate the budget of security in the customs area and health care system, hire more people to really target the consequences of this pandemic.
2. Problem: incarceration population / Level of Government: Federal & Local
social demand: partial animist and set free incrassation population.
Strong recommendation: Relocate the budget in national security to social programs and invest in update the technology that federal and local government use to manage the data.
Proposition: choose those with low criminality or, those that are about to get their release date, if they can prove they have a house where to go and that they can stay there a minimum of 15 days, set them free under parole.
Pair up with local business and for those who are set free, relocated them in a first job social pragma, so they can reinsert into their communities.
3. Problem: Detention centers and immigration courts / Level of Government: Federal & Local
social demand: Set them free and stop deportation.
Strong recommendation: Relocate the budget that you label in national security and relocated to social programs for migrants’ families. Use parole arriving at asylum seekers at ports of entry.
Proposition: Stop deportation and analyses the urgent cases. Maximizing the use of humanitarian parole Hire more social workers and low down your number of security staff, in order to relocate those special family separation cases and send them to their houses. Reactivate the migration hearings and collaborate more with academia and think tanks, to find pro-bono or volunteer attorneys
Link about: https://www.wola.org/analysis/trump-covid19-response-at-border/
This is not a moment to create more chaos and uncertainty, we are already living that, right now is a moment to find solutions and propositions to fix things, together, probably are not perfect but that’s why we need more feedback and a sense of belonging to a major thing.
During these tough times, we need empathy and tons of patience and resilience, therefore find your nearest NGO and volunteer yourself, your humanity will be gratefu.
0 notes