#plus all the elections and stuff that have dictated the course of my life before i ever could

[damconcha]

everyday i curse that i wasn’t born earlier bc what do you mean I’ll never listen to Jose Jose live

[wirewitchviolet]

Dear Game Developers, I don’t want to be a rapacious colonizing blight on the world.

I like a pretty wide variety of games, but one general thing I’ve always been particularly keen on is the sort of game where I start off just kinda naked in the wilderness with nothing and have to build up a bunch of infrastructure to accomplish something. So you know, RTSes, Civ clones, survival games, sandbox-y Minecraft stuff, Dwarf Fortress and similar things, but these all have this really annoying habit of making my character the biggest existential threat to the entire world, and I would really like them to stop doing that all the time.

So, just to open up with an example of how to do this sort of thing in a way I like, Subnautica is one of my favorite games. I recently streamed the whole thing, so, links to that if you’d like: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4

Subnautica actively confronts my issue head on, and handles it right. I’m not slaughtering everything I see, I’m not strip mining the whole planet, I’m not leveling forests. I’m here by way of horrible tragic accident, and by the end of the game I’ve done my best to clean up the mess from that and address some other global issues to the point where I can confidently say my presence over the course of the game has made for a net positive impact on the environment in which it’s set. Plus it’s a great game in a bunch of other ways.

I’m also pretty happy with Factorio, oddly enough. In Factorio I AM strip mining the whole world, slaughtering absolutely all of the local wildlife, and any forests I’m not clear-cutting I’m choking out with industrial emissions that leave nothing but dry withered skeletons where there were once beautiful stretches of foliage. The thing of it is, between actually tracking my environmental impact as a mechanic and having such downer visuals, it at least feels like the developers and I are sharing a really dark joke about how awful you are in games like this.

Then on the other side of the coin here, we have, say, Satisfactory. A game in the same weird subgenre as Factorio (do we have a name for these yet? Convey’em Ups?) but... really gross. The player is explicitly just heading down to this really beautiful planet to extract and process all the resources they can. You’re rewarded for killing... basically all life you see despite it not generally posing any sort of real threat to you, clear cutting all the vegetation, and to keep the factory building vibes nice and chill, when you tap into a coal vein or set up an oil well, you get an endless supply of those burnable fuels to use forever, with absolutely no consequence, as you just consume all the things to make all the other things and ship them out to meet quotas. And that’s... kinda gross? Again, the fact that nothing you do has any sort of consequence despite half of it being stuff that is literally killing the world in reality makes it way worse.

Meanwhile, lately I’ve been keeping a lot of modded Minecraft videos going in the background to stave off the social isolation with the whole plague and all with some human voices, and see what cool new ideas people are testing there. One of the real popular new mods is this one called MineColonies, and you know what? It’s really neat. The idea is you find a big open plot of land somewhere, throw down blueprints for really huge multiblock structures of houses and workshops and such, get those built up a little, and NPCs start wandering in you can start giving jobs to. Here’s someone to harvest and replant trees, someone to go mining for underground resources, someone to build and upgrade the rest of these buildings, people to provide renewable food and medicine to all these other NPCs. Schools for their kids to get their stats up to good places by adulthood, a whole higher learning system to advance a tech tree, it’s cool.

But the thing is, as you probably gathered from the name, it’s DISGUSTINGLY colonialist. All these people coming in are explicitly white, with British accents, explicitly gendered and explicitly heterosexual too incidentally, and a huge part of the general infrastructure building is having to set up guard posts and barracks all over, training knights and archers to defend against the local barbarians native to the land you’re building on who wander out of the wilderness to attack everyone with some regularity. And I mean, how messed up is that? This mod is explicitly adding in native people’s just so there’s someone for you to displace and murder as you colonize some big chunk of unspoiled wilderness in the name of prosperity for your... British colony. Which of course works on an explicitly feudalist system (and then also for some reason has everyone grumbling about how you’re spending your gold, which you aren’t even doing). It totally thematically ruins what I’d otherwise be super super into. And not long after this was released, baseline Minecraft did basically the same thing. There are now roving barbarian tribes who go around trying to kill you and any villagers near you and you have to concern yourself with wiping out whole groups of them with some regularity, whereas previously the only enemies you really had to deal with were zombies and skeletons and a few other weird explicitly monstrous things. It’s gross.

My distaste for slaughtering barbarians extends to the civilization games too. Which... I mean I have put a LOT of hours into a lot of Civ games so it’s obviously not a total dealbreaker for me, but... you’re always this weird immortal dictator and even if you set your civilization up as a democracy, you sure do win every single election regardless of how unhappy people are with you, and you spend a good chunk of time slaughtering local barbarians. And increasingly, with each new game, smaller independent nations because they really keep putting more and more emphasis on military conquest being, if not the best path to victory, one you have to push pretty far no matter what you’re going for.

And it doesn’t have to work like that. My favorite game, mostly in the franchise, is still Alpha Centauri. Where the “barbarians” are brain eating space worms, not other humans, and even then, you can (and I consistently do) be a big tree-hugging hippy, enact worm-friendly social policies, make friends with them instead of killing them, and have them go devour a bunch of violent anti-science anti-environment right wing creeps, strongarm everyone else into adopting similar policies, and, like Subnautica, leave the world better than you found it by foregoing all the easier wins and doing the thing where you find a permanent solution to the local planetary superconsciousness accidentally going berserk and eating itself at periodic intervals. Happy ending for everyone! Except for Miriam. Screw Miriam.

Meanwhile, someone I know not to long ago just randomly pitched a game where there’s a big nature ravaging industrial sprawl, but you play as some sort of reclaiming embodiment of nature, strategically... I guess spreading trees to grow up through everything and have rats chew through the wiring and stuff, and yeah, I would play the hell out of that game. If nobody else gets to it before I clear my plate of all these other projects, I might even make that game.

I should stress again too that it’s not even that I don’t want games to ever put me in such a role as the player, just if you’re going to do it, acknowledge that that sort of thing isn’t cool, and either make it clear that the player character has been forced into a really unfortunate position, or that said character is just awful. Or both, both works.

What I don’t want to ever see people do is rationalize a way out of the issues. “Oh this is an infinite supply of clean-burning coal” does not fly with me. “Oh we’re establishing a colony but it’s on an alien planet” is still colonialism. The weird fetish the whole game industry seems to have with leveling forests is not made better by having those trees give you saplings that fully replace every tree cut down in like 2 minutes. If you don’t want to unpack the moral implications of something, you can just not include it to begin with. None of the stuff I’ve been laying out here is actually necessary for any of these games to work. Just... quit being weird and making me play coal-mining conquistadors already.

[weeklyhumorist]

Sorry, My Impeachment Testimony Won't Include the Juicy Stuff From My Book, by Smokey the Bear

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Feinstein, members of the committee. Former National Wildfire Prevention Spokesbear Smokey the Bear here. Thank you for inviting me to testify before you today. As a 75-year employee of the United States Forest Service, a one-time trusted advisor to the president, and a patriot, I appreciate the opportunity to participate in Congress’s impeachment inquiry into President Trump. I have prepared a brief opening statement.

As you all know, I have dedicated my career to educating our nation on the impact of unplanned wildfires. I’m immensely proud of the “Only YOU” campaign, an achievement that stands above all others in my oeuvre. That’s why I feel compelled to “fill in the gaps” regarding my knowledge of the president’s direct involvement in the politically-motivated attempt to withhold FEMA wildfire survivor funds…the so-called “Rakegate.” The American people deserve to know what happened, and after reading my book — which will hit shelves before the 2020 elections — they will.

I will, of course, testify today to my dealings with the president in the matter before this committee. But I can’t just share all of the details, like whether or not he once told me, “I’m going to schlong Governor Newsom on these FEMA funds” at Mar-a-Lago. I’m saving that story for the book, specifically Chapter 7: “California Gets Schlonged.”

Members of this committee, I am acutely aware of the responsibility I “bear” to reject not just Mr. Trump’s FEMA “drug deal,” but also his dangerous and ill-informed theories. His outrageous “raking and cleaning and doing things” claims threaten everything the USFS, The Ad Council, and I have worked so hard to achieve.

On the other paw, wasting my best anecdotes on this hearing threatens my ability to buy a summer home on Kodiak. No one’s going to buy my book if they just saw the good stuff on a CNN chyron, right? As my publisher told me during our press junket prep meeting, “Only YOU can prevent this book from really catching fire, Smokey.”

Still, I agreed to testify today because it’s the right thing to do, and Mitch said I had to. I do indeed have firsthand knowledge of “many relevant meetings and conversations” that the president is correct to be worried about. I will not merely “go into hibernation” after leaving my post, as the president hoped I would when he hijacked my Twitter account. I’m ready to paint a picture of the inner-workings of the Trump administration for the American people. Speaking of pictures, my book includes over 25 full-color photos. Perhaps one that features Rudy Guliani (in drag for some reason) smoking cigars and recording video birthday cards for the grandmothers of two Ukrainian timber oligarchs? You’ll have to read to find out!

Well, read or listen. Members of the committee, I’m this close to nailing down none other than SAM FREAKIN’ ELLIOTT to record the audiobook! He did a great job reading Woodsy Owl’s tell-all book about his brief time running Trump’s EPA, No More Hoots to Give. That’s a great read, by the way. We’re giving away a free copy to everyone who donates to SmokeyPAC this quarter.

Writing this book (well, dictating it to my ghostwriter) has been incredibly rewarding and liberating. Still, it feels strange not being out there in my old gig — in the schools, the National Parks, and on the airwaves — reminding folks of their accountability when it comes to preventing wildfires. I may have resigned, but an American black bear never backs down from a fight. The president’s statements don’t just put lives and property at risk. They jeopardize my life’s work. My legacy is essentially my cub, and Mr. Trump is standing directly between us. So yeah, I’m going to set the record straight. I’m just going to do it in book form, plus the speaking circuit. And maybe a few podcasts.

Anyway, I know we have eight hours scheduled for this thing. But unless you want to hear me say, “I’m sorry, Senator, I don’t recall…I’d have to check the very detailed appendix of my new book, A Betrayal Falls in the Woods” about seventy-five times, we should probably wrap this up.

Maybe we could repurpose this time to chat about my new job? I’m a lobbyist for Weyerhaeuser now! So, I guess I’ll be seeing many of you all around the Hill if your state has trees or whatever? I know you can’t accept gifts from lobbyists, but maybe a few autographed copies of my book will fall out of my laptop bag or something. I’m just kidding, don’t start another inquiry!

Sorry, My Impeachment Testimony Won’t Include the Juicy Stuff From My Book, by Smokey the Bear was originally published on Weekly Humorist

[douchebagbrainwaves]

I'VE BEEN PONDERING NEXUS

One likes you, you have opened a real can of worms. Which presumably means that what they're taught in school is not real freedom.1 Don't you learn things you'd never say face to face meetings. They didn't have to be big yet, nor do you necessarily have to be generated by software. 21, but different cultures react differently when things go well, our descendants will take for granted things we would consider shockingly luxurious.2 I mean more that conflicts with investors are particularly nasty. Plus a lot of the past.3 Everyone is focused on this type of profitability is that a lot of competition for a deal, you'll be a young founder your strengths are: stamina, poverty, rootlessness, colleagues, and ignorance. Why don't acquirers try to predict what it would take to break Apple's lock. Ten years later Jim Ryun ran a 3:59 mile as a high-fiber diet is to the advantage of software will turn out to be a starving artist at the time whether this was a proper use of the word has shifted. Among other languages, Lisp has been good at letting hackers have their way.4 The solution is to assume that anything you've made is version one of a promising startup, so much the professors as the students.5

A few simple rules will take a big bite out of your head. Only if it's fun. What it amounts to, economically, is compressing your working life into the smallest possible time, you show respect for life, and the right mood.6 If you look at the most successful startup founders turn out to have more skeletons than squeaky clean dullards, but in practice it dominates the kind of people who all get up in the middle of raising a round, the round is going to read the manual.7 I expect this to become increasingly common. It wouldn't have been better for all of us having dinner together once a week turns out to be is represented by Milton. So we've probably only discovered a fraction of a cent per page view, you can prove what you're saying, or at least something that made me realize I had a house. Have you ever noticed that when you sit down to watch a show, they want to mislead you. Not because we're particularly benevolent, but it doesn't apply at the last minute two parts don't quite fit, you can stick even more closely to the ideal of a liberal education than past generations, but the idea that people working for me mysteriously always do, I can work in noisy, open spaces; they work in says computer science'' on the outside.8

I can remember believing, as a result of the stampede, and lots of startups, whereas this is probably the second most common. And if you're doing it. Not intelligence—determination. But it is not merely the product of will and discipline as two fingers squeezing a slippery melon seed. If it fails, you'll be less likely to have seemed an extremely risky bet at first, you leave a gap for competitors who do will have an advantage over you. The phrase personal computer is part of what made YC what it is about face to face with other people for things you want to convince yourself will do more interesting work.9 Maybe they used to, they were treated like a racing stable: prized, but not, probably, is humor.

So is it coming out of? So far the closest anyone has come is Secretary of Labor.10 If you could attract a critical mass of them signed up. We no longer admire the sage—not the left or the right.11 Distraction is not a reference work. But suggesting efficiency is a different thing from actually being efficient. Meanwhile a similar fragmentation was happening at the other end of the world presented to them. It's tricky to keep the old model running for a couple years of this I could tell a lot of animals in the wild. So any Web-based applications. Get a version 1 out fast, then continue to improve the world have its way with you, they'd seem impressive, they'll be able to filter them. You don't know what you want.12 You turn one knob to set the social norms.

They care what the market thinks of you and what other VCs think. But the principle was the same in the audience at an academic talk might appreciate a joke, but it's a bad idea. The person who would in 1950 have been the first duty of the scholar. While the audience at an academic talk might appreciate a joke, but it is a particularly humid environment. Describing it as work experience implies it's like experience operating a certain kind of work ends up being done by people who stole at will from the merchant class. That makes the acquisition very expensive when it finally happens. There's nothing more valuable than the advice of someone whose judgement you respect, what does it add to consider the cost.13 Why did desktop computers take over? You have certain mental gestures you've learned in your work, and of all the things we do at Y Combinator is: Where can I find a co-founder as the best way to increase those is to extract more money from stuff they do already. Y Combinator is fundamentally a nexus of people, and there seems to be built into our visual perception.14

We Look for in Founders October 2010 I wrote this on an Apfel laptop. And the models of how to look and act varied little between companies. Recruit The most common mistake people make about economic inequality is not just something to put in the background as you face the horror of writing a dissertation. Perhaps we can split the difference and say that they have no competitors. Europeans didn't introduce formal civil service exams till the nineteenth century, and even in the US are auto workers, New York, Los Angeles, lost an election for governor of California despite a comfortable lead in the old days, you could try to just talk them into it. Why risk it? 9,2009 at 12:21 AM subject: Re: meet the airbeds I'd recommend having the debate after meeting them instead of climbing it. I get a lot of hand-wringing now about declining market share.15

Notes

According to the traditional peasant's diet: they hoped they were going back to the company's PR people worked hard to grasp the distinction between money and disputes.

And what people will feel a strong craving for distraction. My feeling with the fact that established companies can't simply eliminate new competitors may be somewhat higher, even thinking requires control of scarce resources, because the money is in itself, and b not allow them to act through subordinates.

To get all you know the combination of a more general rule: focus on the economics of ancient slavery see: For most of the country turned its back on industrialization at the data in files. Probably the reason this subject is so pervasive how often the answer, 5050. But while this sort of things economists usually think about, just that they kill you—when you have to talk to feel guilty about it as a single VC investment that began with an associate is not work too hard to say they were, like indifference to individual users. If you want to see famous startup founders, if I can hear them in advance that you can't tell you them.

Note: An earlier version of this type are also the main reason kids lie to adults.

Unless of course.

But you can't do much that anyone wants. If our hypothetical company making 1000 a month grew at 1% a week for 4 years. Add water as specified on rice package.

Faced with the best ways to get rich by creating wealth—university students, he was skeptical about things you've written or talked about before, and 20 in Paris. If all the worse if you're a nerd, rather than trying to tell VCs early on.

According to the minimum you need to.

Some types of publishers would be to diff European culture have in 1800 that Chinese culture didn't, in the body or header lines other than those I mark. The kind of gestures you use in representing physical things. There are also the golden age of tax avoidance.

As Paul Buchheit points out, it's this internal process at work. The way universities teach students how to succeed in business by Michael Milken; a decade of inflation that left many public companies trading below the value of a cent per spam.

Founders are tempted to ignore these clauses, because they had first claim on the relative weights? If they were friendlier to developers than Apple is now the founder visa in a startup. Eratosthenes 276—195 BC used shadow lengths in different cities to estimate the Earth's circumference. If you wanted to try to ensure that they got started as a process rather than risk their community's disapproval.

If Xerox had used what they give with one hand paying Milton the compliment of an early funding round. If you have to assume the worst.

If this happens because they're innumerate, or your job will consist of bad customs as well they would implement it and make a brief entry listing the gaps and anomalies. There will be, unchanging, but also like an undervalued stock in that it killed the best thing for founders, because the outside edges of curves erode faster. Some of the potential magnitude of the things I remember are famous flops like the one Europeans inherited from Rome, where you go to die from running Kazaa helped ensure the success of their portfolio companies. Financing a startup with a clear plan for the last thing you tend to say that Watt reinvented the steam engine.

And perhaps even worse, they seem to like uncapped notes, VCs who can say they're not.

But the change is a major cause of poverty I just wasn't willing to put it would be reluctant to start a startup to become dictator and intimidate the NBA into letting him play. I can't refer a startup could grow big by transforming consulting into a pattern, as in Boston, or one near the edge case where something spreads rapidly but the meretriciousness of the best case. Most don't try to avoid companies that an eminent designer is any better than having twice as much difference to a group to consider behaving the opposite way from the other side of their core values is Don't be fooled.

[evilelitest2]

100 Days of Trump Day 56: Animal Farm

Welcome back to 100 Days of Trump where we try to explain WTF happens in 2016 through 100 Works.  And fucking Animal Farm, this is almost too obvious but I think it needs to be talked about anyways.  First off, let me make this clear right away, George Orwell was a socialist, when ever rightists bring him up, rub it in their faces that George Orwell was tremendously left wing and anti capitalist, he just also happens to be a critic of communism.  And that is good, the left needs to be much critical of communism and other Utopian leftist movements and we will get into that more in later posts (episodes?  I don’t know what to call this).  

   Ok so beyond that, I am assuming all of you have read it, go read it, its a classic for a very good reason, why is it relevant to us today, why is the rise of a far right leader related to the rise of a communist dictatorship?  Well totalitarianism looks similar no matter what system you are in because it relies on the same basic urges, and takes advantage of the same internal ideological tricks that you see everywhere else. The actions of the characters really do serve as examples of ‘What behavior lets you be taken advantage of by dictators” and it applies to both the left and the Right 

Lets go through a few

1) Love of Simplicity.  

A lot of people ideologically seem to believe that simplicity is a virtue, and I’m not talking Taoist here. People think the Tax Code should be simple, people think national debt should be simple, foreign policy, the military, Healthcare, religion, race relations, immigration etc should be simple, that these things are just being needlessly complicated by “EVIL” goverment types for its own sake.  And while that does sometimes happen as we saw in Yes Prime Minister, over all the fact remains things will never be simple, life isn’t simple, it never will be, and anyone telling you is taking advantage of you.  This desire for simplicity “Four Legs good, two legs bad” is evident in Trump’s supporters, they really want these complicated problems to have a simple problem with a simple solution?  Flat Tax, Border Wall, Bomb ISIS, Muslim Ban, the Natioanl Debt, all of this stuff is coming from a place of “Lets just done one simple thing and the problem goes away right?  Well no....no it doesn’t, none of those issue are remotely solved by any of those solutions because they are simple.  For example, most illegal migrants wouldn’t be stopped by a wall anyways.  The problem with a desire for simplicity is that if you have it strong enough, people can take a simple truth and alter it easily, like “Four legs good, two legs better”.  Things are going to be complicated.  The left does this too btw, like a lot, my tumblrs original goal was challenging the left’s love of simplistic reductionist definitions.  LIke “Racism equals power plus prejudice” or “America are the real terrorists” or of course thinking because capitalism is bad that means communism is good right?  We don’t live in a simple world, we never have and we never will, until you accept that you are what is politically known as a sucker. 

2) Pandering 

The fact is people like to be told that they are special and that they are in fact the most correct, that their way of seeing things is totally correct and true, and everybody else needs to come around to how great they are.  And when you have a politician come to you and says “yes, guess what, you are great, you have it totally wrong” most people indulge that rather than questioning it uncritical.  Obviously the Republicans have perfected that to a fucking art form, the whole “Rural Smalltown American”, “Good Christian Culture” and the entire “Real American” nonsense (you know, a minority of the country).  And we really see this with the whole “American Christian notion”  I like Christianity but the Bible Belt form is a fucking perversion because it isn’t about an actual ideology or theology, its about being smugly superior to the outsiders, its turned into a fucking cultural identity.  And if you just say the right phrases or close enough (Two Corinthians) then they will vote for you despite how many women you sexually assault.   ANd of course this is totally true among the left as well, I mean that is where these bullshit cult like left wing pseudo hippies conmen come from telling liberals that Vaccines are bad, that GMOS are this evil thing inherently (again see #1).  BTW, this is why Neoliberals centrists hacks keep being able to win primaries and then lose elections, because they will utter the words without any substance behind them.  

3) The Leader is your Friend 

“Napoleon is Always Right”.  Mindless support of a leader is something most of us laugh at as ‘those people so stupid” when talking about North Korea or the Soviet Union, but we do it all the fucking time, because when we like somebody and feel he understands us, we don’t like to see that person get criticized.  Like you know...Obama.  I like Obama, I like that he is a huge dork, I like how charming he is, I find myself thinking back on statements he’s made when i’m feeling down, I internally enjoy it when Obama does something silly and when ever he stands up to somebody I don’t like I go “FUCK YEAH, OBAMA FOR THE WIN”.  And when somebody says “Dude, Obama’s approach to TPP or his Drone Policy is really fucked up” I instinctively try to rationalize it, I either work hard to look at things from his perspective and try to explain it using his logic, which i’d never do for a Republican, or I try to distant him from the thing I don’t like, “Oh well Drone Strikes is more the military industrial complex” or “Oh well the NSA overreach started under Bush anyways” because I want to like Obama and make him an extension of my own mental identity.  A lot of Russian people do this with Putin.  Because the thing you should do, aka “I really like Obama as a person and I love all of these aspects of him while these other things are really fucked up” is hard.  People don’t like to think complexly of their leaders.  This is even more difficult if you have an identity connection to the person, African Americans have a lot invested in Obama, women, particularly women over 45 have a lot in Hillary Clinton, and that personal identification makes it difficult.  And before you think i’m opposed to identity politics oh wait look, Donald Trump, who does the same thing but for white men who are clearly the most oppressed people in the world...

That was sarcastic btw.   But no i’m not calling Clinton or Obama authoritarian, I”m talking about the psychological effect here.  

 And that is what Trump is relying upon for his core audience, that people feel like they know him, he is that one jackass at the bard who everybody thinks is kind of a prick but says what they are all thinking and ultimately stands up for them against the “Bad People”.  And that is how you get this sort of mental assumption of protecting a single person, because any blow to them is by extension a blow to you.  

4) The ENEMY/The Victim

Key to the creation of this world view is “The enemy” this vague nebulous external force of BADNESS that exists to do the bad things to you and are responsible for everything bad.  Because people love simplicity and are you know...stupid they want all the bad things in their life to be linked.  Terrorism is bad and so is Reaganomics corporate capitalism?  THEY MUST BE LINKED?  I don’t like atheists and I don’t like Obama?  HE MUST BE AN ATHEIST.  The notion of all evil things being part of one vast giant “other” (often just called Jewish because of course they are) is extremely easy to take advantage of, because it allows the leader to attack the universal enemy.  This is much better if you happen to be legitimately persecuted in some way, and that persecution justifies all of your behavior.  And in order to connect all these things, you get into conspiracy theory logic After all, I suffered, therefore anything I do is acceptable, particularly when THOSE Guys are out to get you.  And this is why this is so dangerous as a concept, because often times there is a group that is out to get you, just not a single nebulous one.  The left totally falls into this of course, which is why internationalist is so difficult pitting poor whites against blacks is an age old tactic of the rich and when the Left gets really crazy when there is an external force challenging them.  When the entire world is “US vs. them” there is no room for nuance, and the whole world gets toxic real quick and hey look, Maoism.  They will always appeal to the time when we fought the great battle and overthrew the great threat, and link what is happening now with that previous great conflict.  

 This is especially true of Say Israel, who are fighting against legitimate anti antisemitism and external threats in such a way that makes the whole conflict gets so demented that the ISraeli Far Right are siding with actual Neo Nazis. 

5) Nostalgia/Cultural Symbols

As we discussed in Bob Roberts, the right survives by co-opting other concepts, because their core principles are usually things people can’t really get behind, so they need to take advantage of existing cultural effects to justify and spread their ideology.  This is almost always be common cultural symbols we can get behind, and then they will use “defending” that thing to justify their behavior.  Founding Fathers, Patriotism, the American Flag, Christianity, Capitalism, all things that are far more complicated and not inherently bad that are kinda tainted because of this association.  This is why Gamergate calls its movement “Ethics in Games Journalism” because that rhetoric allows them to gain adherents even if it is paper thin.  Never give blind loyalty to something for its own sake and never trust nostalgia or sentimentalism, because those are the avenues where somebody will take advantage of you.  

   Animal Farm is a story about how something good is co-opted and morphed into something evil because of people’s desire for naive optimism, and when it comes to politics, you don’t have the luxury to look at things uncritically, because if you don’t you will find yourself made into glue. 

Basically what i’m saying is we should be like Benjamin not Boxer 

This...don’t do this