#plep

[collinsbore]

idk i just think they're neat

[employee1618152017]

Oh wow!! 🤩 Come on, it can't be that bad?

> [You’re dizzy, both with the height and with the significant difference in vision]

> [You drop]

> [You crash onto the carpet]

> [1/10]

[omgafhsfanin2024]

Magical Twins ! Yippee. Also feel free to tell about them in your au. I am more than glad to listen-

Okay!!

About the powers, they all have different abilities: Henry (phantom puppet) can see the past and future of anyone, Marianne (nightmarionne) can see anyone's dreams even if the person's awake, and, with Henry, she can create new places in alternative universes out of just will. (this is important to the lore).

Charlotte (Mai) can know everyone's secrets just by looking into their eyes, and Charlie (puppet) Can read minds.

I would show you what Henry and Marianne looked like but I have no drawings of them atm

after the cut there's a "bit" of lore so if you don't wanna read it... don't. lol.

I warn you: my AU is stupid and the concept of shadows completely diverges from canon. Like. Not only some facts. The Remixed Shadows are a whole different thing.

So why do these people have powers? I don't know :D they just do. I thought it was cool to have characters with some sort of mind-reading powers so I just gave some to them. yeah.

Henry and Marianne come from two different rival families, and their story is kinda similar to Romeo and Juliette except Henry and Marianne don't die in the end.

the reason for this rivalry between the two families is the Shadows. that in my AU are some creatures without a defined shape or personality, and sometimes it happens that these entities "combine" their beings with a human's soul, becoming the creatures we all know and love. (it usually happens when the human is a child, but in Freddy's case it happened after the beginning of the AU, but that's a different story.)

the two families were both families of well-known scientists that wanted to study the Shadows and discover what these beings were, since they don't look like an animal, plants, fungi, monera or protists. the thing that diverged between the two surnames was their morals. the Scorpius (Henry's family) had the common conception that the Shadows were a danger to humanity and had to exterminate them (fun fact: Henry and Owynn are Brothers!!) while the Pantins (Marianne's family) had a more humane mind and just studied the Shadows for science and because they wanted to know more about this new kind of creature that first appeared in the mid-90s, and have no intentions of exterminate them and, in reverse, wanted to preserve them and protect these new beings and the humans they "fused" with. this divergence of minds caused the rivalry between the two families, but Henry didn't seem to agree with his family's mindset and instead preferred the rivals' way of thinking. Henry and Marianne met in school and, even though their families were rivals, they started to get feeling for each other as they got closer. of course, they had to keep their relationship secret from their families. and when they became adults, they got lawfully married without anyone knowing and decided that to keep the shadows protected, they had to create a safe space for them. so, using their Spaces-creating powers, voilà the Shadow realm. They promised that the Shadows would be safe from Owynn and Henry's family for as long as they can keep it, but I guess a newly-formed shadow that has no idea of the existence of the shadow realm and just wants to stay close to his human (ahem Fred ahem) gives a bit of suspicion to the vice principal and science teacher, ahem Owynn ahem.

in my AU the twins are part of the toys, even though they don't join the group until after the camp arc. and they already know everything that was going on with their family and the Shadows since they were young since their parents didn't want to keep anything secret from them. they also already visited the shadow realm some times before. even though they didn't spend a lot of time with Freddy or any of the Animatronics, they find out about the existence of Fred at the end of the camp arc, when Joy dies and Fred gets thrown into the shadow realm and gets saved from the twins themselves. (also other things blah blah another story)

oh shit that was a lot of talking um yeah if you want to know what happens in the camp arc and how Joy dies you can ask me but I'm pretty sure it will be kinda long like this one

[manuelamordhorst]

Tipp: Kunstsalat V in der Villa Sponte

[scarefox]

Text post memes but on your own photos and put them in your dating profile.

[daybr43ks-lam8]

... [pokes with a stick]

!☆ snnss.s.ss..

[retshirou]

glepsona. i call her plep

[rederiswrites]

One of my favorite stupid human tricks is the way we share unpleasant experiences, which is handy because it's also a very Tumblr thing.

When I was in college, I took a couple of my best friends to the greenhouse I worked at as a teenager, and in the time since I worked there they'd started growing and carrying stevia. These days most nurseries have stevia, but it was a very new thing then, and I'd never encountered it in plant form. So I picked a bottom leaf, popped it in my mouth, and bit down.

In case you've never done this, lemme tell you, fresh stevia is very powerfully sweet and very powerfully flavored. I bit down exactly once, then my eyes flew open and I *plep*-ed the leaf right back out into my hand, only slightly crushed, and I said, "OMG. You have to try this."

And they both did. The specific leaf I had already chewed, too. We're not heathens, pulling apart nursery plants! I don't remember them needing any convincing--clearly they both also wanted to experience the extraordinary and not pleasant thing. Because we are human, and that sort of nonsense is how we got here.

I am glad to have cultivated this same open-armed curiosity in my children, as well. I have a wonderfully fond memory of sitting in the car at the Asian grocery store with my daughter as we both tried our new experimental drinks. We hated them. Just awful. And we laughed til we cried, watching each other try them again just to be sure, watching each other's faces of disgust and bafflement. We declared it an excellent experiment.

Because if I have to see it, so do you.

[whereisloopisat]

Today, Loop is supporting @plep-peroni !!

(Ooc, Plep has been an amazing friend to me and if you all have the money to support him, please do. Here is his linktree! https://linktr.ee/Plep_Peroni )

(plep if you see this good luck figuring out who it is :3)

[icereader12]

I know I'm either preaching to the choir, or screaming into the void about this, but I feel the need to say it anyway. The phrase "from the river to the sea" is antisemitic. Full stop. Don't like it? Disagree? Unfortunately reality disagrees with you. And in a fight over information, reality should always win.

Let's start with origins. The phrase first gained traction, or general use, in the 1960s. It was co-opted by the PLO in 1964. The PLO was a group of Palestinian liberation groups, hence the name. Throughout the 1960s - the 1990s, they launched terrorist attacks around the world, but mostly in the Middle East. (Brittanica, Nov 16, 2023) The US designated them a terrorist organization, and their first leader, who brought the phrase "from the river to the sea into the limelight, repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel using this phrase (University of Michigan). The PLO claimed to represent Palestinians, and was a fighting force in the Arab-Israel war of 1967, which was declared by the Arab, and lost by them. When the PLO and Arab nations lost, the PLO rallies, and began attacking Israel with guerilla warfare. So the phrase originally referred to the desire to destroy the only majority Jewish state in the world.

History of the phrase continued.

When the PLO decided to recognize reality and acknowledge a two-state solution might be a good idea, many more radical groups in it refused to follow along and broke with the PLO. One of those group was Hamas. Hamas, widely recognized as a terrorist organization, uses the phrase in its charter. Hamas, also in their original charter, states that there will be no peace in the region until all the Jews in said region have been killed.(translation done by Federation of American Scientists). For those who can't connect the dots, that's a call to genocide. By putting that phrase next to their stated desire for genocide, Hamas confirms that that phrase, to them, is a call for genocide. (Business Insider, Nov. 6, 2023) So, in more modern day, it is still a call to genocide.

How the phrase is treated today.

Many who march for Palestine, including Palestine-American Representative Tlaib, say the phrase has changed meanings to them, and that they do not use it as a call for Jewish genocide. (Washington Post, Nov, 2023.) However, most Jewish organizations still regard the phrase as antisemitic, both for its origins, and for how people use it. This includes the ADL, AJC, Jewish Journal, etc. all of whom provide in depth analysis on why the phrase is bad to use. Most of it has to do, as previously stated, with the continued use of the phrase by terrorist organizations such as Hamas and PLEP to call for genocide. While some Palestinians argue that phrase has been commandeered by extremists, but it's okay if they use it because they aren't, that is an horrible argument. The extremists didn't take the phrase from them, they took it from the extremists (see above proof). You'd think, since many pro-palestinians claim to not support the extremists like Hamas, they wouldn't use the same phrases, so as to distance themselves from the crazies. Instead, they embrace the rhetoric.

Nevertheless, the real problem with continuous use of the phrase is that, when a minority group collectively says "that phrase is harmful to our community, please stop saying it", we oblige. When Black Americans said, "stop using the n-word, it's hurtful", we listened, because they were the community being hurt . And soon enough, we as a society realized those still using that word were racist. When the disabled community asked, "stop using the r-word, it's hurtful", we listened, because they were the community being hurt. And soon enough, we as a society realized those who kept using the word despite the harmed community's wishes were bigoted. The phrase "from the river to the sea" has been continuously used, both in the past and now as a rallying call for destruction of an ethnic group on the grounds that those calling for said destruction didn't like having to share land with said ethnic group. It has been used to kill people and incite violence. That's not up for debate, that's a historical fact. It is still being used to incite violence and get people killed. That is also fact. Marginalized communities are allowed to reclaim hurtful phrases for themselves. But the phrase "from the river to the sea" wasn't and still isn't used to hurt Palestinians, it's used to hurt Jews. Therefore, the only ones allowed to reclaim it are the Jews.

I don't care some Palestinians claim to not be using the phrase as it was originally meant. They are still using the rhetoric of an extremist group that uses that rhetoric to call for Jewish genocide. And when people use that same rhetoric for the same cause (liberating Gaza/ Palestine), they are saying, intentionally or not, that they agree with the rhetoric and actions of the terrorists who use that phrase to call for genocide. We can't read minds. Intention means very little when people call for hate. Whether they "mean it" or not, they are still calling for hate. It's the same cause, with the same words. If pro-palestinians insist on using the same phrases used by terrorists, they need to stop getting mad when we confuse them for supporting terrorists. The is nothing wrong with calling for a two-state solution. There is everything wrong with supporting a terrorist organization that calls for genocide. If you use language that could mean either but has historically meant the latter, people will think you are the latter. Calling for the death of all the Jews in a region is antisemitic. The phrase "from the river to the sea" has historically been used, and is currently being used to call for the death of all Jews in Israel. No one cares if you think you're using it differently. To the community still being hurt by that phrase, it is one and the same. Either pick a different slogan or stop being upset that you are being called an antisemitic terrorist supporter.

[amazingbananabread]

What sort of dynamic does Mel have with Wandering Horse and the moth? And are they close with Ethereal Q or any of the other side-characters from the cannon story?

To be honest, she doesn't seem to have a dynamic toward the T.W.H, Goat NN and Mary because i didn't intended to make them some kind of relations or interactions whatsoever, kinda seperating them so one goes here and the other goes there, plep idk how explain but they don't know each other so they don't really have a dynamic.

But i could see Mel later encounter Mary somewhere in the camp lucid and talk for a bit before le moth zooms into the nearest light and forget about the interactions she just has, abandoning Mel.

About the canon side characters, i think Ethereal Q probably and will try to eat Melissa, thinking she probably tastes like eggplant or grape. Nana and Carpet Kitty, i could see that Mel could have some friendships both of the girls, one is bigger than the others. (just gonna let you guys guess who is it)

Satoru? Judging by the fact Satoru's a big simp for Randal and i was pushing more of a love relationship for Mel and Randal, i guess they have a rival-ish views to each other. :3

...

....yo, i might gonna do a relationship chart to expand a bit more on the relationships between Mel and the characters later.

[collinsbore]

weiss re draw from 2021 to 2023

[sethdomain]

Plep

[sts-puelle]

I lile cheese cowboy actually

I dont think ive posted this one so plep this is all you'll get until im done with all of my requirements

[reallyromealone]

do you ever get a fic idea that takes over your mind and is so overwhelming detailed but then when you try to start writing it, mind go plep?

thats me rn

Sometimes it takes me 25 minutes to write something

Other times?

It takes me four months

Because my ravioli brain wants to rush but my heart wants 25k words

[targaros]

Hi bepbles hi belpse hi plep hello pepsi

None of them are right. It is P E B B L E S. How hard is it to spell seven letters in a row?