#pigshit

[mxwhore]

getting up early today to go vote because im not a fcking dumbass <3

[anarchotolkienist]

Also I feel like a good 80% of posts by Brend*nicus that cross my dash contains dogwhistles of some kind, or some other weirdness wrt Jews. He just is fully red-brown at this point, no?

[lifeinthegladhouse]

we have silverfish in my apartment and thats the only real downside (i dont rly understand why theres so many weve seen like 3 which is kinda a lot in 2 weeks i feel like), but anyways my ocd is wildin so im washing all the bedding which i should do ANYWAYS but im also bagging all my old wools and silks and hand washing shit and being kinda crazy but the nice part is my hair looks great and its kinda giving al*n shore sometimes except mullet ANYWAYS i had an evil intrusive thot abt silverfish and then i was like "haha how dirty would someone have to be for that to happen, i mean jesus, id have to roll around in literal shit..." so i made myself actually think abt it graphically to distract me and also desensitize? i have to like, make fun of obsessive thoughts to cope w them (its cool my therapist got me into this)

[elmaestrostan]

Ok, this gave me a chuckle too, god knows it would be much better viewing than the actual Apprentice.

Obviously my favourite bit: “Being human beings, they are utterly charmed by Emery, as are we all.” ♥️

[radio-charlie]

Eeyer...

[vanishingmoments]

of course the fucking army is sponsoring the battlebots thing at SxSW and using it to groom kids

[sweetfirebird]

I just glimpsed a book cover, just for a second before a page refreshed, and I think it was a romance novel, and the bearded guy in the fancy either historical or fantasy outfit on the front was I think meant to look powerful and mysterious and sexy but I swear to you all I thought it was Nandor.

Not that I wouldn't read a romance novel about Nandor, but I don't know if that was the vibe they were going for.

[vergess]

Hi if you're thinking about posting a bunch of videos of the violence in Gaza so you can wallow in self aggrandizement about how you feel so sorry for the middle easterns and how you hate the jews, maybe fucking don't do that actually

[kvrdelen]

of course my village of kurdish elders and children receives no aid. of course.

[proustianrevelry]

no, no, no. Horseshit and bullshit are for calling something fake or a lie. If you're implying something is low quality, it's gotta be dogshit

[mxwhore]

grounded

[angelsarecomputers]

gurgle my balls hard with tongue zionists. endless war on israel forevermore 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

who on earth is actually surprised that JK ‘goblins are hideous evil hooknosed bankers’ Rowling is doing holocaust revisionism

[tyrantisterror]

There's a tweet going around right now about how "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" is uniquely American because Johnny wins instead of learning a lesson about hubris and, like... no, no it isn't, that's actually how a huge number of Christian devil folktales go, especially the earlier ones that are just Pagan trickster folktales with the serial numbers filed off. A good percentage of early devil stories are basically just Rumplestiltskin with Satan in the rumple role.

Like, there's one where a guy makes a deal to give Satan his wife in exchange for manual labor, and at the end he wins by making his wife cover herself in pigshit and chicken feathers so she looks so foul that the devil changes his mind and leaves without taking her. There's another where a guy goes to Satan's house and repeatedly tricks the devil into thinking he's got super strength by doing shit like crushing eggs and claiming they're rocks. The devil was not an insurmountable threat in folklore - if you had either guile or unshakable faith in God, you could easily kick his ass, and you'd have to be a pretty big dumbass with some extreme character flaws of your own to fail to beat him (Dr. Faust was not, in fact, a clever man).

Really, the interesting thing about "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" is that it recreates the feel of classic devil folklore so well while being pretty modern in how its music is structured. It makes me think that this folklore tradition must still be alive despite attempts to squash it out with more modern "The devil is unstoppable unless you convert to Christianity right now" storytelling.

[radio-charlie]

Isn't Ai Wei Wei CIA lol

[patrickdiomedes]

hey at least it's not Zeb Wells

New Namor series

It's being written by Jason Aaron

[radfemverity]

Liberals will defend absolutely anything. And with the rise of trans and nonbinary identifying men developing more obscure, previously-unheard-of fetishes, we will see truly bizarre cases of abuse that go beyond what our legal framework is designed to tackle.

Nowhere can we see this more than with @nominal.Naomi on Twitter, a TIM who produced milk to feed his partner’s child. He also has posted many photos of said child.

Those of us with commonsense spot the red flags this immediately, but liberals say “Lol how is a parent feeding their child a form of child abuse?” Then we point out he has called his lactation abilities “cow achievement”. And that he has an OnlyFans where he cosplays as a cow. And that he has kinks for cows, milk, and breastfeeding. At the same time, he states that while he is currently feeding the baby through a bottle which he’s already put his milk in, he is hoping to be able to directly breastfeed, nipple to mouth, soon.

Liberals still say “lmao TERFs really believe that a mother breastfeeding her child is abusive.”

Two hypothetical questions for those with that line of thought (‘hypothetical’, because I already know the fucking answers):

1. What are the odds, in your opinion, of Naomi, a biological male with a fetish for cows, milk and breastfeeding, who also calls himself a mother, who already posts photos bottle-feeding and wants to directly breastfeed soon, including this child in his OnlyFans content when he is physically able to do so? Bearing in mind that the aforementioned fetishes he has are already topics of his OF. Would you still say that this is transphobes acting as morality police, trying to prevent a parent from innocuously feeding their child, if videos of said child being breastfed became Naomi’s content? Would you be okay with it so long as the child’s face was blurred and cropped out of the footage? Would you say that it is harmless?

2. Under the scenario that this does happen, is this child pornography? If not, why not? Irrespective of his sex or gender identity, this is what Naomi gets off to. He already makes porn with these themes. If it does constitute CP, how can you safeguard children with the existing legislation? You can’t make photos or videos of breastfeeding illegal. It is a biological function of mothers (actual mothers) – which then leaves the option of criminalising it solely on the grounds of men with fetishes partaking in it. But you thick-as-pigshit liberals have already made men with fetishes a protected characteristic in law. And they can sue you for anti-trans discrimination if you dare suggest that they are involving a child in their sexual fetishes.

I’m sure I will get zero answers of any kind, and liberals will do what they always do which is cycle through the four stages of unrelenting denial, before finally saying “how could we possibly have known that something like this would happen?” “how could this have even been prevented?” and act as if they are hatchlings who cracked out of their eggs into the world yesterday and have no idea how anything works.

Probably shouldn’t mention eggs though, don’t want to give ‘mommy Naomi’ any ideas. God, male sexuality is depraved. They really can make a fetish out of anything. And those of a centre-left political disposition will be right there behind them, cheering them on, ready to shut down any legitimate concerns with the classic line of “how does the way other people live their life have any affect on you? Why do you care?”