#paper by 53

[molochsmeat5656]

legacy status is still real guys! crisis averted they were just busy

*theres a glitch so i cant get it yet but i will

the scissors tool will be real yipee yipee

[creativelycomplex]

“You’re not my Louis, you can’t be”.

[carnivalcarriondiscarded]

reopening the ask box is like... just finishing vacuuming shed cat hair, and then immediately going and petting said cat vigorously & watching with delight as So Much Fur sheds right back onto the floor

[vyrion]

god. me when !!!! jay's relationship with her father... jay's relationship with her FAMILY.. with the ferin name ....

[bookwyrminspiration]

i love. buying cheap books. but this one $50 book (cheapest I can get it)...looks so rich with information on a subject I really enjoy...but that's so much money for one book can I possibly justify that...oh the decisions...

[jokeanddaggerdept]

[fappellmoan]

watched my grade soar with a quiz grade and then tank with the presentation i submitted. late and awful quality lol.

[partridgevalley]

I’m going live again tomorrow! I’ll be doing some item icons, UI elements and maybe some sketching. See you there!

Twitch / Itch / Patreon

[skullinahat]

fascinating. obsessed with this usage of catholic.

[dwyane-moggridge-1986]

New Backyard Wedding Tent Diy Paper Lanterns 53 Ideas #wedding #diy #backyard

[assbestos]

remembering how I was one of the ogs on a now defunct drawing community on Paper 53 and how once they put in the text function i hand wrote a text based choose your own adventure game and now it’s fucking gone bc I didn’t save anything from my account

[molochsmeat5656]

can someone tell me if paper still gives out legacy accounts i emailed them bc i got a new ipad and its been 3 business days 5 normal days

i couldnt find anything to say they were discontinued or anything so i hope theyre just busy but i want my scissors tool back

[enos43]

I miei dipinti digitali

www.dropbox.com/sh/rzrqtqxnvxmqqgk/AACZ0XJGia9qCLZyo7xHshvUa

[theonion]

With the struggling newspaper admitting this was the final nail in its coffin, The New York Times announced this week that it would permanently cease publication, saying there was no way it could compete with The Onion’s newly relaunched print edition.

In an internal memo sent to the paper’s 5,800 employees, publisher A.G. Sulzberger said that while he had done everything in his power to keep The New York Times afloat, The Onion’s latest expansion into physical media had forced the company to reevaluate all parts of its business—from its glaringly inaccurate reporting, to its comparatively low circulation numbers, to its deeply unpopular brand, to its completely inept columnists.

“Let me assure you, in the wake of The Onion’s recent decision to relaunch its print product, shutting down The New York Times was not a difficult decision,” said Sulzberger, adding that immediately shuttering all 53 Times bureaus around the world was tantamount to a “mercy killing.” “While we are devastated to see so many employees go, we are happy that we can finally put them out of their misery and no longer force them to work in an environment where The New York Times is out-scooped, out-reported, and outwritten by The Onion at every turn.”

“The truth is, in this modern publishing landscape, The Onion reigns supreme,” Sulzberger added. “There is no amount of time, money, or effort I could invest in this rag to save it from its ultimate, and frankly long overdue, demise.”

Full Story

[probablyasocialecologist]

The New York Times instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept. The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees. The memo — written by Times standards editor Susan Wessling, international editor Philip Pan, and their deputies — “offers guidance about some terms and other issues we have grappled with since the start of the conflict in October.” While the document is presented as an outline for maintaining objective journalistic principles in reporting on the Gaza war, several Times staffers told The Intercept that some of its contents show evidence of the paper’s deference to Israeli narratives.

[...]

Despite the memo’s framing as an effort to not employ incendiary language to describe killings “on all sides,” in the Times reporting on the Gaza war, such language has been used repeatedly to describe attacks against Israelis by Palestinians and almost never in the case of Israel’s large-scale killing of Palestinians. In January, The Intercept published an analysis of New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times coverage of the war from October 7 through November 24 — a period mostly before the new Times guidance was issued. The Intercept analysis showed that the major newspapers reserved terms like “slaughter,” “massacre,” and “horrific” almost exclusively for Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians, rather than for Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli attacks. The analysis found that, as of November 24, the New York Times had described Israeli deaths as a “massacre” on 53 occasions and those of Palestinians just once. The ratio for the use of “slaughter” was 22 to 1, even as the documented number of Palestinians killed climbed to around 15,000.

[sunlilys]

anne vought. gosh i’ve been here before.