#overturnRoe

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

Thanks for sticking up for the babies. You’re doing God’s work 💖 I’m sorry for all the anon hate you’re getting. You don’t deserve that.

Thank you, anon!

I’m pretty used to it though. The hate happens because they know I’m right.

[talmidimblogging]

Being Pro-Life in Post-Roe NYC

Being a #prolife Christian in a Post-Roe New York City is like being on an island in a raging sea. Here’s what this weekend was like. #catholic #nyc #conservative #roevswade #overturnroe #christianity #god #jesus #lifeBeing Pro-Life in Post-Roe NYC

[sfwr]

ABQ pro-lifers to hold Dec. 1 ‘OverturnRoe’ rally as SCOTUS considers pivotal case

ABQ pro-lifers to hold Dec. 1 ‘OverturnRoe’ rally as SCOTUS considers pivotal case

To commemorate the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments on the case Dobbs v. Jackson, which is “the most significant challenge  — Read on pinonpost.com/abq-pro-lifers-to-hold-dec-1-overturnroe-rally-as-scotus-considers-pivotal-case/

[tradcathsermons]

Tweeted

#ProLife #ProLifeGen #PraytoEndAbortion #StopAbortion #CultureOfLife #OverturnRoe pic.twitter.com/elSa1gRWbu

— Edmund Haege (@Ed_Haege) January 19, 2020

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

you’re afraid for the death that will allegedly occur after an abortion ban, but not the death that is occurring right now? Not the genocide of 63 MILLION children? banning abortion is about more than just reducing abortions (which it does accomplish very effectively). banning abortion is about the state recognizing the personhood of a human being made in the Imago Dei, and ensuring justice is afforded them when they are killed.

You call yourself a Catholic, but your reasoning comes from Satan.

Speaking as a Catholic: banning abortion is not pro-life, by pure measure of statistics.

Banning or restricting abortion does not stop abortions, nor does it significantly reduce the rates at which people seek it. What it does do is ensure more people die, whether from pregnancy related complications or from seeking out unregulated, unsafe methods of abortion or from any number of related factors. Not to mention the many grieving parents who will be wrongfully imprisoned for miscarriages and birth complications.

The solution to abortion, if that is what we supposedly seek, is not spending millions on self-congratulatory "marches for life" or lobbying for bans or political campaigning, but to invest in a society that actively addresses poverty, roots out racism and ableism, supports young parents, provides appropriate and comprehensive sex ed, makes medical care accessible, and ultimately addresses the root causes that motivate many parents to terminate a pregnancy. Suggesting anything less is often smug, self-serving bullshit.

[studentsforlife]

Today’s Supreme Court decisions have major implications for Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton. In the DOMA case, the Supreme Court found that the federal government must respect the rights of states to determine their own laws protecting the “rights” of their citizens, citing the ‘equal protection’ clause of the 5th Amendment. This begs the question “Where is the equal protection for pre-born babies?”

In the Prop 8 case, the Court decided to not repeat the mistakes of Roe. They did not overturn the duly enacted laws of states with a sweeping declaration like they did with Roe. They found that the federal government does not have a compelling interest to make a sweeping declaration on equal protections.

The same logic should be applied to Roe. And the Supreme Court should follow its own principles set forth in these cases to overturn Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton and turn those decisions back to the states to extend equal protections to pre-born babies.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

“men stand to lose a lot if Roe v Wade is overturned” oh nooo crappy losers will have to find new ways of avoiding personal responsibility boo hoo cry me a river etc. etc.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

I know it is not a popular position among pro-lifers to say that women should face legal consequences for obtaining abortions. But if we accept even one of these two realities as true, we have no choice but to take this position.

It is self-evident that an embryo/fetus is an individual young human being, by mere virtue of the fact that it will naturally become an individual adult human being.

There is a Natural Law which states that justice demands punishment for the intentional killing of an innocent life, and we must mold our civil laws to satisfy that justice.

If pro-lifers will not admit this, we are going to be rightly perceived as morally and logically inconsistent; people who claim that abortion is murder, but will not prosecute the initiator of that murder even for manslaughter? Because of some nebulous idea that she must have been pressured into doing it? A person has been murdered. There is no escaping that fact.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

Murder is dangerous and should have to stay dangerous, and abortion isn't murder, have a nice day at work 🌻

The burden of proof that abortion isn’t murder is on you, anon. A fetus’ humanity is self-evident.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

How do you think ectopic pregnancies should be handled?

I think this should be done before removal is initiated.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

well I gotta go to work but I just want to reemphasize

MURDER IS DANGEROUS

MURDER SHOULD BE DANGEROUS

WE SHOULD ENSURE MURDER STAYS DANGEROUS

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

First of all, rape accounts for less than 1% of abortions. So if we’re going to talk about rape, we’re going to only talk about rape, and not use victims of rape as props to justify the 99%+ majority of abortions which occur for the sake of convenience.

Secondly, you say every woman you know has been a victim of sexual assault (as have I), yet presume that OP hasn’t merely because of her beliefs. This is something I am constantly seeing women do, waving their flag of victimhood at other women they assume have never been victims themselves, because obviously if they had, they would share the same worldview. It’s gross, frankly.

Third, rape is a horrific act of violence against a person. I support a range of proportionate punishments under the law for it, to include life imprisonment, castration, and/or death. But why is it that we often do not punish rapists according to their crimes, and instead put the child—who is also a victim—to death? Why is it that instead of seeking true justice and empowering women to be free of a victim mentality, we tell them they must be subjected to another act of extreme violence against them—that of abortion?

And most importantly, when we make this argument, we tell living, breathing people walking around right now who were conceived in rape that they have no right to live. That they are a burden. That they should have been killed for crimes they didn’t commit, and everyone they love would be better off for it. We reduce them to a subhuman class.

As for your organ donation analogy, it is not equivalent to abortion. If you refuse to donate an organ and the would-be recipient dies, you are not complicit in their death, because their illness killed them, not you. An abortion directly kills a healthy person. The death of the healthy person is the end goal of abortion.

And while this is not applicable to rape, in 99+% of abortions, the sex which resulted in a baby was done consensually. Nobody likes to hear this, but consent to sex is consent to pregnancy, whether you want it to be or not. That’s just how sex works, full stop. The sex act was you proverbially donating your organs with full awareness and consent. You don’t get to donate an organ and then demand it back after it’s been transplanted.

Where rape is concerned, if one day you woke up and someone had somehow hooked up your heart to the circulatory system of a child who did not ask for it, you can unhook yourself and not be responsible for the child’s death, but you cannot take a gun and shoot the child while maintaining innocence. In pregnancy, there is no unhooking. There is only poison, there is only dismemberment, there is only murder. So the analogy is not equivalent.

This video covers more on abortion in cases of rape.

There is absolutely no world in which a mother killing her own innocent child is a path to healing from rape.

Young women are pro-life, too.

We've seen the arguments, we've seen the facts, and we believe human rights begin at conception. Life begins at conception. No bullying will change our minds.

We are here, we are strong, and we believe in life and rights for all children – and financial support, guidance and compassion for their mothers. No matter the circumstances, we will always choose life.

Gen Z for pro-life. ❤️

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

They are valid questions, sure, but they are not valid concerns, and it’s not just a matter of semantics. Pro-lifers should be willing to answer any honest questions people may have. But we should not be validating concerns that are not based in fact.

“Women will have no means of navigating this new landscape,” is not a valid concern. There are plenty of organizations and resources at their fingertips.

“Women are going to be locked up now,” is not a valid concern as there are no laws or trigger laws currently on the books which jail women for obtaining abortions (though goals and beliefs on this matter vary among pro-lifers, and I would argue that even if it were a factually valid concern, it would not be a morally valid concern, as women who order hits on their children should surely be subject to legal consequences).

“No support will be available for women with unplanned pregnancies,” is obviously not a valid concern, provided the pro-life movement keeps up the momentum it has maintained for the past several years in serving vulnerable communities.

They are valid questions if asked honestly, but the concern felt over them is unfounded and therefore invalid.

It is evident that we are going to disagree on theology, so I will not press the matter. My point is, we are all made in the image of God, but a pro-choice Christian is far more family to me than a pro-life unbeliever is. I have certain obligations towards the Christian that I do not have toward the unbeliever.

To be unapologetically pro-life is one thing, but to make flippant posts about rubbing the potential overturning of Roe in people's faces isn't being pro-life. It's being prideful.

People who aren't pro-life have real concerns about this happening that are relevant and valid, and this is a great time to engage in friendly dialogue about how to support women facing unplanned pregnancies and provide nonviolent solutions to those issues - not to "own" pro-choice people in debates.

We are one human family, one broken human family. Act like it.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

cancers have unique combinations of DNA, too, should we cease treating cancers since that's enough to give them a soul?

No, because it is not the DNA of a human individual, nor will it ever become a human individual. This is basic, basic logic and science my dudes.

[rabbits-of-negative-euphoria]

If the adoption waiting list is long then why would you want to make it longer?

bro. the waiting list of prospective parents is long.