#on the life and crimes of Richard Ramirez

[ffuckmeupjunghoseok]

Excerpts detailing the early relationship between Richard Ramirez and his sister. Taken from The Night Stalker: The Life And Crimes of Richard Ramirez by Philip Carlo. Pages 191, 192, & 194.

[hysteriamodes]

The thing with the Alice x Bumby ship and people who support it not only don't understand the ramifications of what Bumby did to Alice and that it's pretty obvious he was continuing with his obsession with Lizzie.

Alice looks very much like her older sister and shares personality traits with Lizzie. So Alice would have ended up the same as Lizzie, assaulted and murdered. Because in terms of the type of serial offender Bumby is, the likelihood of him repeating the same crime was extremely high.

But also they don't understand that Bumby was not only targeting Alice but children, something that you can see in actual, real-life serial offenders like the Golden State Killer, Ted Bundy, or even Richard Ramirez. These were sexual sadists, Bumby is also a sexual sadist. Not to mention, Bundy worked in a suicide prevention call center so I don't know how you cannot draw the comparison.

So, I have had the term "anti" thrown at me, and normally, genuinely, I'm of the mind "I don't like this ship, so I'm not going to read it" because policing people over fictional ships is a waste of time. And I'll be the first to admit I especially hate this ship because I HAD several Bumbys in my life. I was sexually abused as a little girl, so I especially hate this character. And we do have several CSA survivors in fandom, they have had the same feelings. If you're writing a ship that mirrors our trauma, yeah, it's gonna piss people off. But I'm not gonna be mad enough to throw out death threats.

However.

And this is a big HOWEVER.

Largely, the biggest reason as to why I don't like it because anyone who dabbles in this ship cannot manage to keep it IC (in character). They fundamentally don't understand Alice's characterization:

1. Alice is an extremely guarded individual, literally anyone around her treats her like a burden, object, or belittle her sense of being.

2. It's highly unlikely Alice is going to romantically gush over someone, much less someone she put into a position of a mentor, so the swooning doesn't make any sense to me. If you're writing Alice in a romantic relationship, you have to keep in mind that it probably took a WHILE. When I write Alice in romantic relationships, it's a slow burn build up.

3. She likely is very reluctant to share the burden of her mental illness (unless slow burn, see above), so, again, Alice is not going to be the how to open up to people so easily.

4. Alice is extremely independent, most times. You can see she'd rather do it herself, without help unless it's a necessity, and she puts more trust in herself than in people. So, it wouldn't make sense for Alice to open up to Bumby, a doctor, outside of a patient.

And like. These shippers tend to "woobify" Bumby. He's not gonna be chivalrous.

1.He's a sociopath, so his empathy is non-existent. He didn't see Lizzie as a person, he saw her as an object he was entitled to.

2. He showed little regard to Mr. Liddell, his superior, someone he kept going to see, as his mentor. He exploited that dynamic only on the account of Lizzie.

3. The man has a superiority complex, so he won't see anyone as his equal. His ego was too big and he was so full of himself and he underestimated Alice (like everyone else) and doesn't care for her, at all.

So, every time I see this ship pop up, these characters are so woefully OOC (out of character) and that shows me you didn't understand the source material.

If you're into a dark ship, that's fine, but you're essentially re-writing characters so far from the original source material that they may as well be your own characters. You can find a dark ship with Alice, but pick someone better than Bumby. Like, guys, Bumby would have done the same thing he did to Lizzie to Alice and Alice found out at the last minute before he had the chance.

Just saying as an Alice RPer.

[manie-sans-delire-x]

Asking out of real interest, what do you mean by “PDs aren’t just bad behaviour”? I know there’s neurological differences and all, but I feel as if there must be some element of choice for ASPD? Obviously it’s not a choice to have the personality disorder, but the behavioural aspects confuse me a little. Like what compels someone to lie pathologically, exploit, manipulate, be horrendously irresponsible etc. in daily life? Also: is it daily? How severe/frequent does this type of behaviour have to be to lead to dx

Yeah its a complicated thing isnt it? It really comes down to the discussion of whether humans have genuine free will at all, or if we're just animals at the mercy of our brain chemistry. Honestly, the more I study psychology, and evolution, the more I become inclined to believe the latter, even if it may sometimes be a "cop-out" excuse. But I don't believe humans are in control of ourselves as much as we like to believe, we are just animals, perceiving and reacting based off innate predispositions and our environment around us, neither of which we can control. Nature vs nurture? We cannot control either, and twin studies show nature/innate genetics actually determines who we are a little bit more- about 60% to 40%. Actions are decided based off thoughts and feelings, again neither of which humans can control, only try to manage after it has already come into existence and awareness. Unfortunately, whether its true or not, society can't really function on that premise. Society HAS to function on the premise that humans have total free will, or we couldn't punish crime or hold people responsible for anything. Even if its scientifically proven that humans dont have free will, I dont think humans are willing or capable of accepting or fully understanding that about themselves.

Also, its the same conflict with other disorders- people with anorexia "choose" not to eat. People with depression choose to not bathe. They are perfectly physically capable of it, but they are "unable" or at least its deeply difficult to do so because of internal factors, even if they want to recover. Is that truly free will? Are they under control of an illness that has co-opted their brain? Does a drug addict have full control over themselves when the drug has changed their neurochemistry? A person with schizophrenia may understand that they are being paranoid or having hallucinations, but they cannot stop being paranoid and having hallucinations.

You say that you know there are neurological differences and people with ASPD dont choose to have that, but aren't our actions determined by our neurology? Our thinking, our emotions. Brain chemistry determines it all doesnt it? Isnt that why medication works, that thoughts, feelings, and behavior strongly changes once brain chemistry changes? Isnt that why brain damage can completely change a persons personality and behavior? We know that physical damage to the brain often causes severe aggression, seen in many serial killers like Richard Ramirez and even in odd cases like Phineas Gage. So is it so different from that, whether the damage to the brain is cause by a physical outside influence, or abuse and trauma? We can see on scans that abuse and trauma changes the physical structure of the brain- its smaller, has less neural activity and less volume of gray matter.

Ultimately I don't know, I dont have the answers. But it sure is a fascinating topic!! Stanford neurobiologist Robert Sapolsky argued the same thing- that free will doesnt exist. I havent read it but he wrote a book about it.

-----

"Like what compels someone to lie pathologically, exploit, manipulate, be horrendously irresponsible etc. in daily life?"

Thats another complicated but very interesting question! But ok lets ask this, what compels someone to NOT lie? To tell the truth, to treat people well, to be responsible and show up at work everyday even when they dont actually want to. I think its the same answer- genetic personality and upbringing. Basically, maybe we are all just trained dogs. We all act based on what we are shown, what we are taught (and genetic predispositions). People do what they believe is best for themselves, what they deserve, what others deserve. People act on how they expect others will act- an abuse victim being aggressive and attacking first because they expect to be attacked due to prior life experience. Most liars think other people lie. People who scam justify to themselves by saying the fault is in the victim for being stupid, and separate themselves from the victim by believing they would never fall for such an obvious scam (whether thats true or not).

People can justify anything, most people dont think of themselves as a bad person. Even rapists and murderers justify it to themselves, and they can even be horrified by the same crime committed by someone else. Humans have a blind spot when it comes to themselves, especially humans with ASPD or NPD. Even though they are PDs, there really is an element of delusion in it, same as psychosis. They are not fully living in the mainstream "reality". Breaking free of that delusional state and realizing that they are the monster, they are the bad guy, that they are the problem, can be a huge shock. Its a complete change of perspective, their world turning upside down. Most arent capable of ever even reaching that break through point, because its too painful, and would ruin their self image and narrative of their life. Or they are not naturally insightful enough, or versed in psychological and philosophical thinking enough. I'm speaking from personal experience here, when I had my moment of "I am the monster in this story" when I was 19 it was very shocking because I was delusional, I did not see it like that at all, I was viewing my life from my perspective, naturally. Suddenly I saw two mirror realities of my life and myself, both equally real and valid, but very different perspectives. But I'll just say this- it makes total sense at the time. It makes total sense to lie, or manipulate, or kill, or rob. It all just comes down to perspective. I dont think people can fully understand something without experiencing it themselves. To understand a murderer, you have to commit murder. But then it really does make sense.

Most people with PDs are victims of childhood abuse and trauma. It warps your thinking, your ways of feeling, and thus your actions. You dont relate to other human beings the same way healthy people do. That basic bond and care, the recognition of the self in the other is damaged. Trauma makes your brain shut off your empathy and connection to others to better survive, so you dont have to carry the pain of others on top of your own suffering, so you can prioritize your own survival.

I think it can be very hard for a victim of abuse to admit when they are NOT the victim this time but instead the perpetrator in a situation. And I think thats because they have not been properly validated yet. Their trauma needs to be fully acknowledged first, or else they end up just feeling defensive, angry, resentful. "Well what about MY trauma? No one cares about that but everyone cares about my victim? NOW people care?" They need to be fully validated first, then work to acknowledge that a person can be Both a victim and a perpetrator.

-----

"Also: is it daily? How severe/frequent does this type of behaviour have to be to lead to dx"

It just has to be severe and frequent enough to meet the diagnostic criteria in the DSM or ICD. Yes its daily because PDs are a consistent thing, not episodic. PDs are serious disorders and can be harmful or even dangerous to others, but I also dont want you to have the wrong impression that most people with PDs are like these lurking scheming villians who plot all day. Most people with PDs, even ASPD and NPD, are just people who are really suffering and struggling to live day to day. Most have co-morbid mental illnesses, or addictions, and a history of trauma. The PD is considered a disorder because it negatively impacts their own life so much, and who in their right mind would choose that? As a mental health practitioner, I operate by the belief that the person with the disorder is always the one suffering the most. Its important to remember that when compassion fatigue is setting in.

-----

These are topics I find fascinating, and I'd love to hear what others think. I hope this answer wasn't too rambling, I'm a little high. I'm also going to post something I've been working on- I call it "thought perspective" and basically it's just an effort to understanding mental illnesses from the inside out, to see specifics of thinking. I think it may help you understand what I mean more, about people with PDs and/or severe trauma just operating in a different reality and how their actions make sense from their perspective. Thanks for the ask!!

[sapphire-weapon]

this is a totally unprompted question, but how do feel about the ethics of true crime? and i don’t necessarily mean in that specific way (fangirls, glamorizers, etc), moreso the consumption and consumerism that’s attached to these real life events as if it’s purely ‘entertainment’, if that makes sense?

you can totally delete/ignore this if you want, too. no hard feelings lol i just think we as a society are odd creatures

I don't view it as different from other documentaries. There's a respectful/informative way to depict atrocity, and there's a shitty way to do it.

The Nightstalker documentary on Netflix about Richard Ramirez? Good, well done. The Ted Bundy tapes? GARBAGE, THROW IT OUT.

[slutforspungen]

𖤐 my intro as slutforspungen 𖤐

my name is opal, I’m 15 years old and from the uk scotland to be specific & i have autism

as you can tell i absolutely love nancy spungen i could genuinely sit and talk about her for hours I find her and her whole relationship with sid to be really interesting, i got into them a few months ago in march because I watched the youtube video elanor neale done on them back in january, but I guess i never started really thinking about them until march not sure what sparked my random thought of them which led me down a whole rabbit hole but i’m thankful it happened I had heard their names referenced before back in 2018-2020 when i was a massive gacha life kid and loved “devils don’t fly” & “so am i” which are two songs that reference them obviously, never gave it any thought to look into who they were, i have read deborah spungens book “and I don’t want to live this life, a mothers story of her daughters murder” and i have also read den brownes book “padlocks living with sid and nancy”, i love nancy but I half like sid but I do believe they both deserved better and mental illness and drugs were their downfall enough on them i love to read and learn about them, random but i also love kate moss.

i’m also big on tcc (true crime community) my favourite shooting/shooters are columbine - eric harris & dylan klebold, and my favourite serial killers are jeffery dahmer & richard ramirez, I also like parkland - nikolas cruz, oxford - ethan crumbley, academy maniacs, jodi arias, kinda like salvador ramos & adam lanza, elliot rodger, dylann roof (im not racist) also randy stair/andrew blaze and probably more I can’t remember right now, i’m about to read sue klebolds book “a mother’s reckoning” and i know their not tcc but i love bonnie & clyde i’ve watched the 1967 movie and have two books on them i’ll soon read.

very random i know but I also like kpop and thai bl shows I just have lots of random interests don’t judge lol and i love to listen to lots of random music from multiple genres, I love cats to I have a 2 year old cat called alvin after alvin and the chipmunks and a 9 year old white labrador called poppy, I’m anxious overthink a lot so I struggle to speak to people so i apologise for being dry & i’m homeschooled and i love the 50s - 2000s eras/culture and just everything about those decades that’s all. 𖤐

[absolutelyfuckinggnobody]

if richard ramirez’s mind was DID one of his alters would def be named miguel

because that’s who ramirez adapted most of his crime life from

[incoldbloodsblog]

Top 5 Crime Documentaries You Can't Miss on Netflix

True crime documentaries have surged in popularity, captivating audiences with their gripping narratives and real-life mysteries. Netflix has become a go-to platform for these enthralling stories, offering a wide range of documentaries that delve into infamous crimes, the psychology of criminals, and the pursuit of justice. Here are five must-watch crime documentaries on Netflix that you simply can't miss.

1. Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal (2023)

Length: 2 seasons, 6 episodes (approx. 50 minutes each)This gripping docuseries explores the complex and tragic events surrounding the Murdaugh family, a prominent legal dynasty in South Carolina. Following a fatal boating accident involving the family's son, the series unravels a web of deceit, murder, and corruption that leads to shocking revelations about the family's dark secrets. The documentary combines interviews, news footage, and dramatic reenactments to provide a comprehensive look at this scandal that captivated the nation.

2. The Hatchet Wielding Hitchhiker (2023)

Length: 1 hour 27 minutesThis documentary tells the bizarre story of Kai, a homeless man who became an internet sensation after saving a woman from an attacker using a hatchet. Initially hailed as a hero, Kai's life took a dark turn when he was arrested for murder just months later. The film explores themes of fame, mental health, and the consequences of sudden notoriety while examining how quickly public perception can shift.

3. American Murder: The Family Next Door (2020)

Length: 1 hour 23 minutesThis heart-wrenching documentary chronicles the tragic disappearance of Shanann Watts and her two daughters in Colorado in 2018. Through social media posts, text messages, and police footage, it paints a chilling picture of domestic violence and betrayal. The film not only tells the story of a family torn apart but also examines the broader implications of such tragedies within society.

4. Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer (2021)

Length: 4 episodes (approx. 50 minutes each)Set in the summer of 1985, this docuseries follows the investigation into Richard Ramirez, one of America's most notorious serial killers. Through interviews with detectives and survivors, it reveals the terror that gripped Los Angeles as Ramirez committed a series of brutal murders and sexual assaults. The series highlights both the psychological impact on victims and the relentless pursuit by law enforcement to bring him to justice.

5. Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes (2022)

Length: 3 episodes (approx. 60 minutes each)This chilling documentary provides an in-depth look at one of America's most infamous serial killers through previously unreleased audio recordings from his defense attorney. The tapes reveal Dahmer's disturbing thoughts and motivations behind his heinous crimes, offering insights into his psyche while also examining societal failures that allowed his actions to go unchecked for so long.

Conclusion

These five crime documentaries on Netflix offer compelling narratives that not only entertain but also provoke thought about crime, justice, and human nature. Whether you're interested in high-profile cases or more obscure stories, each documentary provides a unique perspective on the darker sides of humanity. Grab some popcorn and prepare for an intense viewing experience that will keep you on the edge of your seat.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

[lovelyheart502]

After 11 years of writing love letters to her prospective husband, Doreen Lioy finally married the man of her dreams. The 1996 ceremony took place in San Quentin State Prison because her new husband was the notorious serial killer Richard Ramirez.

Known as the “Night Stalker,” Ramirez had been sentenced to death for killing over a dozen people in the mid-1980s, terrifying California by attacking victims while they slept. Despite overwhelming evidence, Lioy believed in his innocence and married him. “I can’t help the way the world looks at him,” she said. “They don’t know him the way I do.”

Before meeting Ramirez, Lioy led a relatively normal life as a successful magazine editor, known for grooming celebrities like John Stamos. Stamos later reflected on her choice, describing her as a “very lonely woman” and Ramirez as a “monster.”

Born in 1955 in Burbank, California, Lioy had a starkly different upbringing compared to Ramirez’s traumatic childhood. Ramirez, born on February 29, 1960, in El Paso, Texas, was abused by his father and influenced by his cousin Miguel’s stories of violence. Ramirez’s criminal life escalated after witnessing his cousin murder his own wife.

From 1984 to 1985, Ramirez murdered at least 14 people across California, incorporating Satanic elements into his crimes. He was arrested in August 1985 after being recognized and beaten by bystanders.

Lioy, attracted to Ramirez shortly after his arrest, sent him 75 letters over 11 years and became his most loyal visitor, often defending his character in public. Despite being sentenced to death, Ramirez married Lioy on October 3, 1996, in a prison ceremony.

While Lioy remained devoted, their relationship reportedly deteriorated before Ramirez’s death in 2013 from B-cell lymphoma. Lioy has since disappeared from the public eye, and her current whereabouts are unknown.

[therealcrimediary]

The landscape of American serial killers is marred by the actions of some of the most infamous figures, such as Ted Bundy, Aileen Wuornos, and John Wayne Gacy. The article takes a measured approach, seeking to understand rather than glorify their heinous crimes. From Belle Gunness's deadly marriages to Richard Ramirez's night stalker terror, each killer's story sheds light on the shadows they cast over society. By exploring these cautionary tales, readers can engage in broader conversations about justice, prevention, and societal response to such dark deeds. Belle Gunness, one of the first female serial killers, lured wealthy men to her Indiana farm under the guise of marriage, ultimately resulting in dozens of deaths for insurance payouts. Her calculated approach leveraged societal norms, such as marriage, and involved poisoning as a method of disposing of her victims. Gunness's chilling reality was uncovered after a fire revealed multiple bodies on her farm, forcing the public to confront the horrors of her deeds and the dangers that can lurk behind domesticity and romance. Ed Gein's gruesome trophies, fashioned from the body parts of his victims, earned him the reputation as a notorious killer. His creations served as tangible connections to his victims, sparking fascination and revulsion among the community. Gein's legacy remains a macabre footnote in American criminal history, illustrating the depths of human depravity and the challenges of linking serial crimes without advanced forensic technologies. John Wayne Gacy's double life as a charming community figure and a vicious serial killer highlights the capacity for human duplicity. His arrest and conviction on 33 counts of murder shattered the deceitful image he had cultivated, shocking the community. Gacy's story serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance in safeguarding against hidden dangers, as evil can lurk behind the most appealing of guises. The article delves into the cannibalistic crimes of Jeffrey Dahmer, whose post-murder behavior involved acts of necrophilia and retaining parts of his victims as trophies. His killing spree, spanning a decade and targeting young men and boys, emphasized the depths of human depravity. Dahmer's case remains a reminder of the need for justice and vigilance in protecting vulnerable populations from predators like him. The enigmatic Zodiac Killer, known for his cryptic letters and taunting clues, remains one of the most mysterious and elusive serial killers in American history. Despite claims of at least 37 murders, only a fraction have been confirmed. The killer's cryptic clues challenged law enforcement and society's need for closure and resolution. The case represents a strategic offender who controlled the narrative through cryptic communication, perpetuating fear and fascination surrounding his unidentified identity.

[ffuckmeupjunghoseok]

Excerpt regarding Richard Ramirez's experience with Satanism from The Night Stalker: The Life And Crimes of Richard Ramirez by Philip Carlo, page 239, paralleling Mercedes Ramirez's declaration in Richard Ramirez's petitioned appeal.

[nephrosoupp-archive]

#asks#book recommendations#idk I read ..odd obscure things that peak my interest sorry#I like Ann Rule’s true crime novels! I just re-read uhh Last Dance Last Chance by her#it’s about a narcissistic murderous cosmetic surgeon heheh#and Oo I very much enjoyed The Night Stalker by Philip Carlo#on the life and crimes of Richard Ramirez#I think it was the first true crime novel I ever owned 👌#mya rambles and is dumb#classic literature is also good.. the stuff they teach in ap English lit was amazing#though I don’t think any of my classmates much enjoyed them haha#we read this wonderful beautiful melancholic book once called#The History of Love by Nicole Krauss and wow...

-tags from nephrosoupp

Hey Mya! Have you been reading anything recently? I'm most of the way through a book I've enjoyed very much. Now I'm trying to hold myself back from buying many, many books since I know I'll start a new one when I finish my current one jdhskdh

Hello how are you : D ? aw geez I think I spent most of my allowance on books as well.. it’s difficult to get English books here, which is frustrating (I borrow books from open library and archives.org though, which is noice! I finish most in one day :”) )

I re-read The Minus Man by Lew McCreary because,, the film is good but the book is spectacular, and hmm I re-read Spider by Patrick McGrath as soon as I finished Minus Man, bc they gave me similar vibes (?)

And oh! Birdy by William Wharton and I read a couple stories in some of McSweeney’s Publishing’s collection of books, they’re absurd and quite hilarious.. I also finished Leaving Las Vegas (John O’Brien) a while ago and it made me cry 🥲

I have a goodreads account (though I can’t go on there as often as I’d like because, even with vpn the app short circuits a lot in my country rip) but m-maybe there’ll be some books in my ‘want to read’ section that might interest you? Sorry for the long response aa please recommend some books to me as well

hope you’re having a wonderful day ! 💛

[myfrenzi]

Investigating True Crime Documentaries on OTT Platforms

Investigating True Crime Documentaries on OTT Platforms: What to Watch on OTT

Hey there, detective enthusiasts! If you’re anything like me, you love a good mystery. And what’s better than watching real-life crime stories unfold right on your screen? Thanks to Over-the-Top (OTT) platforms, you can dive into the thrilling world of true crime documentaries. So, let’s put on our detective hats and explore what to watch on OTT for some spine-tingling investigations!

Unmasking the Mystery

True crime documentaries are like real-life puzzles. They take you through actual criminal cases, from the crime scene to the courtroom. Here are some fascinating ones you don’t want to miss:

1. “Making a Murderer” (2015)

This docuseries will have you questioning the justice system. It follows the case of Steven Avery, a man wrongfully convicted of a crime, only to find himself accused of another shocking crime years later.

2. “The Jinx” (2015)

“The Jinx” delves into the life of millionaire Robert Durst, who’s been linked to multiple unsolved crimes. Prepare for jaw-dropping revelations and a stunning finale.

3. “The Staircase” (2004)

A gripping true story about the death of Kathleen Peterson, whose husband Michael becomes the prime suspect. It’s a rollercoaster of courtroom drama and family secrets.

Unsolved Mysteries

Sometimes, the most captivating stories are the ones that remain unsolved. These documentaries will keep you guessing:

1. “The Disappearance of Madeleine McCann” (2019)

The case of young Madeleine McCann, who vanished while on vacation in Portugal, has baffled investigators for years. This series unravels the mystery behind her disappearance.

2. “The Case Against Adnan Syed” (2019)

This documentary reopens the case of Adnan Syed, who was convicted of murdering his high school girlfriend. With new evidence, the truth might finally come to light.

3. “The Cecil Hotel” (2021)

A notorious hotel in Los Angeles becomes the setting for numerous strange and unsolved mysteries. Dive into the eerie history of the Cecil Hotel and the enigmatic disappearances that occurred there.

Famous Criminals

Some true crime documentaries focus on the minds of infamous criminals. It’s a chilling look into what makes them tick:

1. “Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes” (2019)

Ted Bundy was one of America’s most notorious serial killers. This series features interviews with Bundy himself, shedding light on his disturbing psyche.

2. “The Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer” (2021)

Follow the investigation to capture Richard Ramirez, a serial killer and rapist who terrorized Southern California in the 1980s. It’s a gripping cat-and-mouse chase.

3. “The Sons of Sam: A Descent into Darkness” (2021)

This documentary explores the theory that the infamous Son of Sam killer, David Berkowitz, didn’t act alone. It’s a deep dive into the world of conspiracy theories and true crime.

Where to Find the Suspense

So, where can you uncover these true crime gems on OTT? Popular platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Max are packed with riveting documentaries. They’ve got the inside scoop on real mysteries, and they’re just a click away.

Wrapping Up the Case

True crime documentaries on OTT are like a never-ending puzzle. They keep you on the edge of your seat, and just when you think you’ve solved it, there’s another twist. So, the next time you’re wondering what to watch on OTT, consider diving into the thrilling world of true crime. But beware, it’s addictive!

FAQs

Are these documentaries suitable for kids? True crime documentaries often deal with mature themes and real crimes, so they may not be suitable for younger viewers. Parents should use discretion.

Are there any light-hearted true crime documentaries? While many true crime documentaries are intense, some focus on lighter or quirky cases that might be less unsettling.

Do these documentaries provide closure to the cases? In some cases, true crime documentaries may lead to new developments or even legal actions. However, not all cases are solved or resolved within the documentary.

Can I watch these documentaries for free on OTT platforms? Some OTT platforms offer a limited selection of content for free, but many true crime documentaries may require a subscription or rental fee.

Are there any fictional crime series on OTT platforms? Yes, OTT platforms also offer fictional crime dramas and series for those who enjoy scripted mysteries and thrillers.

[importanttragedyfan]

Här är en bok jag vill tipsa dig om!

Kolla in den här boken: https://www.nextory.se/bok/the-night-stalker-the-life-and-crimes-of-richard-ramirez-10629287/

[loverockawaitsyou]

that bar that you went to sounds cool as hell! do you know the name of it? i’d love to check it out online!

also i’m kinda confused by you saying that EDR was filmed ‘down the road’ when you were in DTLA, because EDR was filmed in Auckland, New Zealand..🤔

Yeah, I should have looked up the filming info. It may have been filmed in NZ, but it's set in LA with some shots of the US Bank Tower in the background... which I was very close to and walked by when I exited the bar! And even if it wasn't there for real, I was spooked because I've seen a few true crime docs and saw some stories about creepy things that have happened in DTLA. Maybe that's why they didn't film there for real, LOL. It's pretty gross and creepy in some areas in real life.

If you haven't heard of them, look into Elisa Lam, The Black Dahlia, and Richard Ramirez (The Night Stalker). Probably worst DTLA stories.

The bar I went to is called the Veil! It's considered to be LA's only goth bar! And its address is 555 Spring St. Guess they couldn't get 666, ha ha.

And they named food items on their menu after various serial killers and monsters (Richard Ramirez included).

Here's a link to the IG so you can see pics

https://instagram.com/theveilindtla?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

[rbran959]

Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer Review

(Alt text: A photo of the documentary title and the "Night Stalker", Richard Ramirez)

I watched the documentary, Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer, episode 1. A big question is why are serial killers the way they are. This documentary runs you through what this killer nicknamed the “Night Stalker” did. There are men (Sherman Block, Detective Gil Carrillo, and Detective Frank Salerno) from the LA county Sheriff in the homicide bureau who worked on the case explain what went down and walking you through what the Night Stalker had done. The documentary showed news reports in the LA county that went on air at the time of this killer, there were clips of residents talking about how scared they felt when all of this was going on. The documentary even had survivors of the Night Stalker talk and explain their experiences with him. This documentary is in chronological order of the events that happened with the Night Stalker.

The documentary attempts to answer the question of why serial killers are the way they are is because of deviance. For example, this killer seemed to have the fantasy of seeing fear in others. He waited to see fear in the people he killed before he killed them. One example is, the Night Stalker shot at a girl, but she didn’t die, when she ran into him a second time, he pointed a gun at her expecting her to show fear, but instead she said please don’t shoot me you already shot at me once. Because this interaction did not cause fear in the girl, he put the gun down and simply walked away.

The documentary sets up the homicide detectives as the heroes who are looking for and trying to catch this killer, with obviously portraying the killer to be as evil as he was. While watching this documentary you can tell how much they rely on sounds to show mood. Right off the bat the documentary gives you this very creepy and eerie feeling. The background music is very creepy and menacing, along with that the screen is becoming glitchy and cutting out.  A lot of the time they are playing creepy and eerie music to scare you and give you chills, like the chilling actions this killer did. But when the “hero”, homicide detective Gil Carrillo was talking about his childhood and start of his career the music was calmer and more somber. You could relax a little bit and feel more comfortable when he was talking about himself compared to when he talks about the Night Stalker. If they are talking about the Night Stalker killing and shooting someone, you sometimes get this strong and loud gunshot noise, which leaves you feeling startled just like the victims did when they heard that.

The imagery and lighting are also very intense. There are cut scenes to bloody murder weapons when talking about what type of weapon the Night Stalker used to kill a specific victim or even just a scene of dripping blood. Along with when they talk about the victim you get a black cut scene with the victim’s name and age they died in a bold white, just black and white staring you in the face. It's like it is saying here are the cold hard facts you cannot ignore that this happened. They also used real police photographs of the crime scene and the victim, which is very terrifying to see, because it truly puts the words into real life. The lighting throughout the documentary is dark and dreary, no bright lights, this makes sure to keep the mood eerie. Sometimes the screen also glitches out and makes a loud glitching noise. If anything, ever becomes glitchy in a horror movie, you know that it is scary or is going to become scary. When they use the glitching effect it does make you feel afraid, especially with the fact that you know this was a real horror and something that did happen. It is not just coming from some horror movie.

[forgiveness-in-the-misery]

Omfg i was so pissed off watching 1984 trying to not only make Richard Ramirez a lovable sexy bad boy but also trying to weirdly turn him into a comedic character like I enjoyed some of AHS but i fucking hated ever single season had to involve a real life crime but make it sexy or make it funny or hey lets throw in Anne Frank as a joke

Sister, ranting about a vídeo on the decadence of AHS:

The problem with Ryan Murphy is that he writes women for that specific brand of mysoginistic gay men. His favorite female characters are like dolls where to project an in style aestetic, with that bitchy and insufferable whimsical personalities, while the rest end up like dolls to wreck. No in between: It's either a fucking bitch that the plot wants you so badly to like, or the most suffering innocent woman you will ever see that allways has the worst ending. I want to see the bitch suffer, but she never gets to suffer as much as the suffering woman because she is the writer's favorite doll so even if she does it's never cathartic enough. The narrative wants you to feel sorry for the bitch.

Me, thinking of Don Mancini's writing of Tiffany and Nica in the show: You are so real.