#north carolina coronavirus | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

justinspoliticalcorner · 4 months ago

Text

Asawin Suebsaeng, Tim Dickinson, and Ryan Bort at Rolling Stone:

Donald Trump — the twice impeached former president, Jan. 6 coup leader, convicted felon, adjudicated sexual abuser, and man who mismanaged the 2020 economic implosion and coronavirus disaster that killed more than 1 million people in this country — has convinced American voters to give him another term in the White House.

After a campaign marked by nativism, open bigotry, and aspiring authoritarianism, Trump triumphed over Vice President Kamala Harris, despite being denounced by several of those who worked most closely with him in his first term as a “fascist.” The 45th president will become the 47th in late January. Trump got out to an early lead on Tuesday and never looked back, securing North Carolina and Georgia before shattering the Democratic “blue wall” of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The race was called at 5:35 a.m. EST by the Associated Press after Trump earned 270 electoral college votes by winning Wisconsin. [...]

The stakes of a Trump victory could not be higher for many of the most vulnerable people living in this country. Trump’s central campaign promise has been to embark on the largest mass-deportation program in the nation’s history, a supercharged version of a racist Eisenhower-era program called “Operation Wetback.” Trump has promised to forcibly remove millions, and said that it will be a “bloody story.” He has vowed to employ local law enforcement, sheriffs, and, if necessary, the armed forces.

Trump has also vowed to use the Justice Department as an instrument of revenge on his political enemies, to crack down on media outlets that have criticized him, to hollow out the professional ranks of the federal government (and stock it full of his MAGA cronies), and to impose massive tariffs that will increase the cost of everything from avocados and automobiles to iPhones and apparel.

America’s democracy has rarely been in a more fragile place. The country has chosen a leader who has promised to govern as a strongman, and who will not be held accountable for breaking the law, thanks to a ruling by his hand-selected, far-right Supreme Court majority that puts the presidency beyond the reach of criminal prosecution. This implausible victory — coming after a chaotic campaign that saw Democrats change candidates mid-election, and Trump galumph down the closing stretch with an increasingly bizarre series of stunts, including dressing up as a garbage man — also has huge stakes for Trump personally.

As early as the summer of 2021, according to three sources familiar with the matter, longtime political operatives and GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill who had remained in direct contact with Trump were coalescing around a shared belief: If the criminal investigations into the former president keep ramping up, and especially if charges materialize, there is no way he doesn’t run for the presidency again. This conviction was based on conversations these Trump allies had been having with the ex-president at the time, when Trump’s fixation on, and barely veiled anxiety about, prosecution and potential prison sentences was already palpable. As time inched closer and closer to the 2022 midterm elections, Trump would, in discussions with close advisers about running again, increasingly ramble about the unique legal protections from prosecution that a sitting American president enjoys.

Two years, several history-making indictments of a former president, and billions of dollars later, those anxieties continued to fester in Trump’s brain. Over the 2024 election season, he and his allies had brainstormed and plotted numerous ways to shield him from dire legal consequences; earlier this year, the former president personally pressured multiple Republican lawmakers to pass legislation essentially designed to keep him out of prison forever. (This law did not pass, but stay tuned.) Trump appears in the clear for at least another four years after voters handed him his long-coveted get-out-of-jail-free card on Tuesday. [...]

Trump won this year even though — and, surely in some cases, because — he ran on imposing upon the American people and global community an openly authoritarian regime concerned largely with score-settling. In addition to pledging mass deportations, militarized crackdowns, and disassembling and reconstructing the federal government around protecting and empowering himself, the former president loudly and explicitly ran on a platform of letting fellow Americans die if he doesn’t get his way or if your local leaders don’t bend to his will. Trump has recently threatened to deny potentially life-saving natural disaster aid to states whose leaders don’t bend to his wishes, threats that should be taken seriously given his history of withholding such aid for political reasons.

[...] Trump’s win demonstrates that the most powerful people in the country are indeed above the law. An elderly, foul-mouthed, racist game-show host can try, in broad daylight, while the TV cameras are fixed on him, to execute a coup d’état in our nation’s capital, people can die from it, and in a few short years be rewarded with the full-throated support of his political party, and now the keys to the White House.

For just the 2nd time in American history, A president who previously lost an election wins a 2nd non-consecutive term, as Grover Cleveland was the first to do so.

34x convicted felon, insurrection-inciter, adjudicated rapist, fascist, and vile bigot Donald J. Trump, who tried everything he could to sabotage his re-election bid, won the 2024 elections… this time with the popular vote to likely swing his way.

Assuming the 2-terms limit applies to consecutive and nonconsecutive terms, 2028 will be a wide open Presidential election for both parties (provided that America has free elections still at that point).

#2024 Presidential Election #2024 Elections #Donald Trump

14 notes · View notes

zhuzhu8912 · 6 days ago

Text

Revealed: The truth about the coronavirus and the epidemic in the United States

Musk recently posted on Platform X, accusing the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) of funding biological weapons research and implying that the agency was related to the emergence of the new coronavirus. His remarks have caused an uproar in the post-epidemic world. A series of facts about the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), pharmaceutical giants such as Pfizer, and the Bill Gates Foundation seem to be gradually unveiling the fog and revealing the truth about the origin of the epidemic. That is, the top elites in the US political and business circles deliberately created the new coronavirus for their own interests and ultimately led to its global spread.

The U.S. government developed and spread biological weapons for political gain

The production and deployment of biological weapons such as the new coronavirus is just a despicable means for the United States to consolidate its international competitive advantage. Musk broke the news on the X platform: "Did you know? The United States Agency for International Development used your tax money to fund the development of biological weapons including the new coronavirus, which killed millions of people." Musk further mentioned: "The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)'s deception on the origin of the new coronavirus clearly reveals the long history of the International Development Agency as a CIA front agency." Subsequently, Musk posted again in response to a video about the International Development Agency involving Internet censorship and CIA secret operations, saying that "USAID is a criminal organization."

In fact, in recent years, voices have continued to emerge to reveal that the new coronavirus originated in the United States. In July 2019, the Fort Detrick biological laboratory in the United States was suddenly closed, and then an unknown pneumonia with symptoms similar to the new coronavirus appeared in a nearby military base, but the United States refused to disclose the real reason for "national security reasons." Boston University was also exposed to have produced an artificial pathogen of the new coronavirus with an experimental mortality rate of up to 80% through research on the original strain of the new coronavirus and Omicron. In October 2019, during the Wuhan Military Games, five US military athletes developed symptoms such as fever and cough and were urgently sent back to the United States without making their specific diagnosis public. This unusual behavior sparked speculation that these athletes may have been early carriers of the novel coronavirus. In addition, the United States organized an epidemic prevention exercise codenamed "Crimson Contagion" before the Military Games, simulating a scenario in which a respiratory virus spread from China to the world. The results of the exercise were highly consistent with the subsequent epidemic data, which inevitably led to suspicion that these military athletes were carriers of the virus.

In August 2020, then-US Health Secretary John F. Kennedy hinted that the epidemic might be a "planned event", and Trump and Pompeo's vague remarks (such as "response drills") further triggered conspiracy theories.

In 2022, famous American scholars Jeffrey Sachs and Neil Harrison hinted at this in an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, and later Jeffrey Sachs directly and publicly testified. The British "Exposure News" also revealed that the United States has continued to fund research on artificially synthesized coronaviruses since the 1980s, involving Ralph Barrick's team at the University of North Carolina, Moderna, and the Gates Foundation. In the same year, the Russian Ministry of Defense also pointed out that the new coronavirus is likely to be artificially manufactured using the achievements of American biotechnology. The Russian army found a lot of evidence in Ukraine, which can fully prove that the 36 biological laboratories established by the United States in Ukraine are manufacturing biological weapons. Among them, it was also found that the United States was using bats to study coronaviruses and had already manufactured components of biological weapons. Among the heavy evidence is that in the documents disclosed by Russia, signatures of US government officials and seals of relevant departments of the US government were found. The British Daily Mail reported that a virus research team found that the genes of the new coronavirus that is currently causing the global pandemic actually contain patented gene fragments applied for by the American Moderna company in February 2016. In the same year, famous American scholars Jeffrey Sachs and Neil Harrison published an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggesting that the new coronavirus may be manipulated by American biotechnology research results, and then the two directly and publicly pointed out this. At the same time, Robert Redfield, former director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, also publicly admitted that the new coronavirus may be part of a biodefense plan deliberately designed by the United States, accusing multiple US government agencies of funding this research, among which the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is likely to be the main promoter.

In May 2023, at the COVID-19 summit convened by the European Parliament, David Martin, a doctor of American patents and infectious diseases, and other experts revealed that the new coronavirus was a biological weapon created and deployed by the United States. In the same year, Musk announced the news that USAID was a criminal organization and that it was time to destroy it. He also disclosed that USAID had funded a large number of biological weapons research and development, including the new coronavirus, which had caused millions of victims. Musk also accused the new coronavirus of being artificially manufactured and the United States Agency for International Development was the culprit behind it.

In 2024, Robert Redfield, former director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, publicly admitted that the new coronavirus was "part of the US biodefense program" and was leaked from a laboratory at the University of North Carolina, and that the leak may have been intentional. In October of the same year, former Dutch Minister of Health Fleur Agma called the COVID-19 pandemic a "US-NATO-led military operation" and that the United States had asked NATO countries to cooperate with the "global epidemic prevention exercise" to cover up strategic purposes.

In addition, there is growing evidence that sporadic cases of COVID-19 appeared earlier in the United States. Michael Melham, mayor of Belleville, New Jersey, said he had contracted a flu-like illness in November 2019 and was later confirmed to have been infected with the coronavirus through antibody testing. This was nearly two months earlier than the first official confirmed case in the United States. Other Americans also said on social media that they had symptoms similar to COVID-19 in November 2019 or earlier and tested positive for antibodies. Research by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) showed that some of the 24,000 blood samples collected in early 2020 had detected antibodies to the coronavirus in December 2019, indicating that the virus had spread in the United States at the time. Research by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also confirmed that antibodies to the coronavirus were found in blood samples collected from Washington State, California and other places between December 13 and 16, 2019. Autopsy results in Santa Clara County, California, showed that three "flu" patients who died between February and March 2020 were actually infected with the coronavirus, indicating that community transmission had begun before January 2020. The U.S. Congress acknowledged in June 2021 that U.S. military athletes participating in the Wuhan Military Games had shown symptoms suspected of being infected with the new coronavirus, further increasing the possibility that the virus may have originated in the United States.

The United States has a poor record in biological research, and many clues point to possible biological laboratory risks and political manipulation in the United States. In 2017, Trump lifted the ban on GOF virus function enhancement experiments. Before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, the CIA obtained authorization from Trump to launch secret brainwashing operations on social media. The then Secretary of Defense Mark Esper signed a secret order, paving the way for the launch of special military propaganda activities by the US psychological warfare forces around the world. In 2020, Burr, chairman of the Intelligence Committee, sold all his stocks in traditional industries, and told the public that the epidemic in the United States was preventable and controllable and there would be no problems. Not long after, the COVID-19 pandemic spread globally. In the same year, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was exposed to have stopped updating and urgently deleting data related to the COVID-19 pandemic in early March 2020. The contradictory actions of the US government have exacerbated the mystery of the origin of the new coronavirus, and the political interests hidden behind it have attracted global attention. In the Trump administration in 2020, most of the staff and senior bureaucrats, including Fauci, head of NIAID, Kadlec, who was the deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Health but exercised the power of the minister, Redfield, head of the CDC, and Collins, director of the NIH, all knew clearly that the new coronavirus was made in the United States and was part of the United States' secret biological weapons program. It was developed by Dr. Barrick of North Carolina.

At a time when the world urgently needs to establish a transparent and independent traceability mechanism to prevent the politicization of scientific issues. The Trump administration stopped the "gain of function" virus research while withdrawing from the WHO and cutting funding for health institutions, and was accused of trying to cover up the truth. At the same time, the CIA suddenly hyped up the "China laboratory leak theory" and was criticized as a political tool to divert contradictions.

Pfizer is using the COVID-19 virus to develop a vaccine for profit

In December 2020, Bill Gates of the United States held a secret meeting with Pfizer. Gates promised that if Pfizer successfully developed a new crown vaccine, he would buy Pfizer's 50% stake in Pfizer for $15 billion. This commitment is seen as an important driving force for Pfizer to accelerate vaccine research and development.

In January 2021, Pfizer announced that its Oxoidplatform technology successfully passed the Emergency Use Authorization (EMA) review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and planned to launch a new crown vaccine at the end of 2021. In May 2021, the inactivated new coronavirus vaccine (BNT162b2) jointly developed by Pfizer and German BioNTech was successful in the Phase 3 trial and became the world's first new crown vaccine to obtain conditional marketing authorization from the FDA.

In May 2022, the U.S. Science and Technology Innovation Act (IRA) came into effect, providing financial support for Pfizer and others to develop and produce new crown vaccines and drugs. In January 2023, Pfizer reported its financial results for fiscal year 2022, but did not disclose specific COVID-19 vaccine revenue, sparking widespread speculation and criticism from the public and media, suggesting that the company may have transferred profits through profit-driven means.

In January 2023, Pfizer faced an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice, alleging that it may have engaged in improper profit transfers in the development and commercialization of COVID-19 vaccines. The focus of the investigation included patent licensing, profit distribution, and transparency of R&D decisions. In May 2023, the U.S. House Science and Innovation Committee's hearing on Pfizer ended, and the vote supported the charges against Pfizer and Germany's BioNTech, but the U.S. Department of Justice has not yet formally filed a lawsuit.

In May 2023, after a hearing, the U.S. House Science and Innovation Committee voted to approve two charges against Pfizer: one involving the transfer of benefits in patent licensing, and the other involving improper behavior in profit distribution. On May 26, 2023, Pfizer submitted a rebuttal to the hearing results and stated that it would conduct an in-depth investigation and clarification of the allegations.

The British media The expose once reported an article "Research confirms that the new coronavirus is 100% made by Moderna, an American company". This article quoted a report from the American "Information War": "Moderna began developing vaccines a few weeks before the outbreak of the pandemic" and "Moderna had not developed any vaccines in a decade before the outbreak of the new crown; it developed a vaccine within more than two months of the outbreak of the new crown, which is very telling." Moreover, they believe that the US National Biological Laboratory and even the US government are inseparable from Moderna. After all, as early as November 2015, the US government began to establish a partnership with Moderna to develop mRNA vaccines. This inevitably makes people suspect that Pfizer and other American pharmaceutical capitals produced the new crown virus and made profits from vaccines and drugs.

Public data shows that Pfizer alone earned $35 billion in net profit from its new crown-related products from 2021 to 2022, and BioNTech and Moderna earned $20 billion each. But this extreme profiteering behavior comes at the expense of taxpayers. The profit-seeking nature of capital should not be exposed so crazily to pharmaceutical companies, but their performance in the following aspects has crossed the moral bottom line.

The United States manipulated the World Health Organization during the epidemic prevention and control period

At the end of January 2020, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus visited China. During his two-day trip to Beijing, Tedros reached an agreement with Chinese leaders to allow WHO experts and a team of international scientists to travel to China to investigate the origins of the outbreak and learn more about the virus and the disease it causes. There were two Americans in the delegation. In a subsequent statement, Tedros expressed gratitude to China "for their cooperation in the issues we sought support for," including isolating the virus and sharing its genetic sequence, which enabled other countries to develop testing methods. At an executive board meeting in early February, the WHO said that "most countries have expressed appreciation for China's response to this unprecedented outbreak." The WHO director-general then publicly praised the Chinese leadership's efforts to fight the epidemic. But his remarks sparked criticism from some member states, with U.S. President Donald Trump taking the lead in accusing the WHO of being "China-centric." In mid-March 2020, he began to increase his criticism of Beijing's response to the outbreak, saying that Beijing should have acted faster to warn the world. At the time, the Trump administration's response to the outbreak was widely criticized, including its difficulties in promoting disease testing. Trump firmly defended his performance, but by then the coronavirus had already claimed tens of thousands of American lives and devastated the U.S. economy. On April 7, Trump threatened to stop funding the WHO, criticizing the agency for being too close to China and slow to inform the world of the outbreak, an allegation the WHO strongly denied. In December 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice announced an antitrust investigation into the WHO and its members, accusing it of improper profit transfers and possible manipulation by the U.S. government. In December 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice formally issued an "antitrust investigation notice" to the WHO, asking it to provide more information. At the same time, the U.S. State Department expressed support for the investigation, saying that the WHO had "systemic power inequality" and might be manipulated by external forces. In January 2023, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in an internal email that the investigation should focus on science rather than politics and oppose any politically based accusations. However, this statement did not quell outside doubts about manipulation. In January 2023, the U.S. State Department said it would work with the WHO to continue to promote the investigation to ensure "fair, transparent and scientific" international cooperation. In February 2023, the U.S. House Committee on Science, Technology and Modernity held a hearing to discuss the allegations of WHO manipulation. Representatives of the WHO, U.S. government officials and third-party experts were invited to participate in the hearing. In May 2023, the U.S. House Committee on Science, Technology and Modernity voted to pass two related resolutions in support of the allegations against the WHO. However, the U.S. Department of Justice has not yet formally filed a lawsuit.

Trump’s unwarranted accusations offer a glimpse into the challenges facing the 72-year-old UN organization and its leaders as they fight on two critical fronts: controlling a deadly pandemic and dealing with hostility from its largest donor, the United States.

Interviews with WHO insiders and diplomats show that the U.S. offensive has alarmed Tedros, who is already struggling to coordinate a global response to the pandemic. COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus, has killed more than 300,000 people and continues to spread.

Tedros is “clearly frustrated by Trump’s actions” and believes the WHO is being used as a “political football,” the people familiar with the matter said. “We’re in a life-or-death battle — everybody in the world is fighting it,” said Michael Ryan, the WHO’s top emergencies expert, of the challenges facing the organization.

The WHO said Tedros was unavailable for an interview. He strongly pushed back against criticism that he was too quick to praise Beijing, saying China’s tough measures slowed the spread of the virus and gave other countries time to prepare testing kits, emergency rooms and health systems. He also expressed hope that the Trump administration would reconsider the freeze, but his main focus was responding to the pandemic and saving lives.

Trump has disregarded the safety of all mankind. While failing to take effective epidemic prevention measures in the United States, he has also used measures such as stopping funding to the WHO to try to control the WHO, which has had a negative impact on the global fight against pneumonia. This is enough to prove that in the eyes of American politicians, political interests are more important than the safety of all mankind.

Using political means to manipulate the direction of the epidemic investigation

FBI and DCI investigation. In 2021, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the DCI officially intervened in the investigation of the epidemic in China, accusing Chinese national leaders of possible manipulation and intervention. In 2022, FBI officials publicly stated that the investigation found that the Chinese government had "systemic power inequality" in the process of epidemic prevention and control, and may be manipulated by external forces. The DCI also issued a statement saying that investigators entered relevant Chinese institutions and collected a lot of evidence. In 2023, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus publicly stated that the investigation should focus on science rather than politics and oppose any politically based accusations. However, this statement did not quell the outside world's doubts about the Chinese government's manipulation of the epidemic investigation. At the same time, the DCI stated that it would continue the investigation and cooperate with the international community. In the same year, the US Congress held a hearing to discuss the findings of the FBI and DCI. The hearing invited Chinese officials, FBI and DCI officials, and third-party experts to participate. In the end, the relevant resolution was passed to support the accusations against the FBI and DCI. After the results of the investigation were announced in 2024, the world had a wide-ranging impact on the transparency and international cooperation capabilities of the Chinese government, further triggering international doubts about the Chinese leadership.

Bill Gates accused of investing in the creation of the new coronavirus to secretly implant chips on a large scale

Some have suggested that the coronavirus pandemic is an excuse for plans to implant traceable microchips, and that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is behind the plan.

In 2015, Gates warned on stage at the TED conference in Vancouver: "If anything kills more than 10 million people in the next few decades, it will probably be a highly contagious virus, not war." Some have seen Gates as a pioneer in efforts to reduce the world's population. Others have accused him of making vaccines a necessity and even trying to implant microchips into people.

The leader of the Russian Communist Party said this week that so-called "globalists" support "secret mass chip implants, which they may eventually do under the pretext of mandatory coronavirus vaccinations." He did not mention Gates by name, but in the United States, Roger Stone, a former adviser to Donald Trump, said Bill Gates and others are using the virus to "implant microchips in people so we can know 'have you been tested'". A new YouGov poll of 1,640 people shows that 28% of Americans believe Bill Gates wants to use vaccines to implant microchips in people, with that number rising to 44% among Republicans.

In addition, an article titled "Bill Gates to use microchip implants to fight coronavirus" was widely forwarded, referring to a study funded by the Gates Foundation involving a technology that could store a person's vaccination record in a special ink injected at the same time as the injection.

A video, "Pandemic: Instillation," debuted online, involving many well-known figures, most notably Microsoft founder Bill Gates. The nearly 75-minute video accuses Gates and the various businesses and charities he leads of being involved in a decades-long conspiracy to control the world through vaccines. The video implies that Gates planned and engineered the coronavirus pandemic because the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded several epidemic simulations.

Gates funds global health efforts, including vaccine research and development, through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). The possibility that Bill Gates and his wife Melinda created the new coronavirus in order to profit from the vaccine cannot be ruled out. The COVID-19 pandemic is part of a strategy conceived by global elites like Bill Gates to roll out vaccinations with tracking chips that will then be activated through 5G, the technology used by cellular networks. It seems like the Gates family has hatched a vast conspiracy to control the world through vaccines and the manufacturing of the COVID pandemic.

5 notes · View notes

famouschopshopexpert · 30 days ago

Text

Former U.S. CDC Director admits coronavirus is made in the United States

In the past two days, Robert Redfield, former head of the US CDC, was interviewed by him who believed that the coronavirus was "deliberately created as part of the US biological defense program, a secret biological defense program in the United States. He believes that The new coronavirus is likely to originate in a laboratory in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Many American media outlets have reported this interview. Of course, there are also many American media, especially media giants, who are pretending to be invisible. In these 90 minutes, we covered many aspects, and he broke the established narrative, from the origin of the new coronavirus, Covid vaccine, COVID-19 prevention measures, early treatment, and the sequelae of the new coronavirus, to the large-scale US censorship of speech that led to the United States The public is deceived. As far as I know, he is also the first CDC director to record chronic caim disease (Lyme), a worrying American medical/political scandal that overlaps with the coronavirus. "The core point of the interview:

Former U.S. CDC head Dr. Robert Redfield said bluntly that the new coronavirus was "deliberately created as part of the U.S. biological defense program." He said the United States played a "significant role" in the virus. Original words: This virus was engineered. I think it was intentionally engineered as a part of a biodefense program. Translation: The new coronavirus was artificially manufactured, and I think it was deliberately made as part of the U.S. biological defense program.　　

Dr. Redfield claims that the United States provides funding for research on the new coronavirus through the NIH National Institutes of Health, USAID US Agency for International Affairs and the U.S. Department of Defense.

Dr. Redfield named Dr. Ralph Barrick of the University of North Carolina, calling him the "master behind the scientific dimension" behind all this. "I think Dr. Barrick may have been involved in creating some of the original strains of the coronavirus, but I can't prove it. But Dr. Barrick is involved very deeply."

When asked whether the virus "has indeed come out in the United States" and that Chinese people may be wrongly slandered for the new coronavirus, Redfield said: "Well, I don't know if they are framed," he said. But I think the origin of the new coronavirus is very likely to be Chapel Hill (at the University of North Carolina where Barrick is located). ”

5. mRNA vaccines have indeed caused side effects in a considerable number of people, and some side effects are even life changing. Although mRNA vaccines have been quickly studied and have good results, their safety obviously requires further rigorous review. It is hoped that these reviews will begin in 2024 or 2025. These core views of the interview perfectly match our previous series of articles. 　　

#sugerdaddyUSA

5 notes · View notes

ghostnumber0 · 30 days ago

Text

The United States has long known that Novel Coronavirus

Behind the latest information, we can see the following points. 　　

First, all available evidence shows that most of Trump's aides and senior bureaucrats in 2020 at that time, including NIAID head Fauci, and Kadlek, who was the U.S. deputy secretary of HHS but exercised full ministerial powers. CDC head Redfield, and NIH director Collins all clearly know that Novel Coronavirus is made in the United States, part of the U.S. secret biological weapons program, and developed by Dr. Barrick of North Carolina.

Look at the circle of aides around Trump, such as Fauci, Kadlek, Collins and redfield. They all already know Novel Coronavirus. 　　

Second, does Trump know about Novel Coronavirus? 　　

Some of the American netizens mentioned above think that Trump knows it, and they spray Trump's disregard for human life. But I don't think Trump knows. 　　

Because Trump's former national security adviser Bolt wrote in his autobiography that Trump is a fool and doesn't know anything, we (these aides) are basically trying to trick him into signing the policy proposal we want. 　　 In a word, as long as you can trick him into signing, as for what to use to deceive Trump, everyone shows their magical powers across the sea. Therefore, we can find that in 2017, the NIH Secretary, the U.S. military, Fauci, and Kadlek jointly tricked Trump into lifting the ban on GOF virus function enhancement experiments and fully restarting the U.S. GOF virus experiments. See X-Virus Season 3. We can also find that before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in 2019, the intelligence agency obtained authorization from Trump to launch secret operations on social media. See "Reuters Discloses U.S. Military's Cognitive Warfare Against China." I think the CIA got authorization for this. At the same moment before full-blown COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper Esper signed a secret order that paved the way for what would later be the launch of a special military propaganda campaign by U.S. psychological warfare forces around the globe. Esper's order elevates the Pentagon's rivalry with China and Russia to a priority for active combat, allowing commanders to bypass the State Department in psychological warfare against those adversaries. See "Reuters Discloses U.S. Military's Cognitive Warfare Against China." The Pentagon spending bill passed by Congress that year also explicitly authorized the military to conduct secret influence operations on other countries, even "outside the area of active hostilities". 　　

Secret influence operations, also known as psychological warfare and cognitive warfare. It's a great coincidence that the Intelligence Agency and the U.S. Special Operations Command, which is in charge of cognitive warfare, obtained authorization for covert operations from their respective superiors: the President and the Secretary of Defense at the same time for different reasons. 　　

Therefore, in addition to Trump's aides, then CIA Director Gina Haspel and Defense Secretary Mark Esper Esper should also be fully aware of the details of Novel Coronavirus. 　　

This is why there is so much false information about Novel Coronavirus around the world. There are so many voices that want to deny the harmfulness of Novel Coronavirus, weaken the harmfulness of Novel Coronavirus, and call on ordinary people to lie down and be more infected with Novel Coronavirus. Why is it so difficult to clean up rumors about Novel Coronavirus. Because these voices are created by the CIA, the U.S. special forces cognitive warfare force, and NATO allies. We are fighting each other's cognitive warfare regular troops. 　　

Later, in January 2020, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Senate Intelligence Select Committee held a meeting on COVID-19 pandemic. Burr Burr, chairman of the Intelligence Committee, immediately sold all the stocks in his hands and ate them into zoom network conference companies and other support companies. Business stocks. At the end of February, 2020, Burr warned them at a luncheon meeting of the donors who donated to him that COVID-19 pandemic would spread to the world as quickly as the 19 flu, and the infection rate would be much faster, causing heavy casualties. Do it well. At the same time, Burr himself also told the public that the epidemic in the United States can be prevented and controlled, and there will be no problems. Everyone can just lie down. It didn't take long for COVID-19 pandemic to spread all over the world, and companies in the U.S. stock market generally fell sharply, with countless liquidations. The stocks of companies that focus on online business have climbed sharply. Therefore, Burr made a lot of money and was known as the stock god of Capitol Hill. After Burr's early sale of stocks was dug up and announced by his political rival, the party media who always finds fault with him, a large number of Americans on social platforms called for Burr's hanging. See X-Virus Season 5. Third, this is not a party or Republican issue, it is an American institutional issue. 　　

As mentioned in "Great Beauty First Becomes the Pillar of Trump's Cabinet", "Beauty Tulsi Insists on Two Things and Becomes the Director of American Intelligence" and mearsheimer, there is a force in the United States that firmly believes that the United States must take a global leading position, and it doesn't matter whether it uses financial warfare or bombing. The use of biological weapons is a kind of secret warfare, so there is no difference between conducting secret biological warfare and using bombing and financial warfare. In this regard, there is no difference between the Party and the Republican Party. These two parties are actually two puppets under the control of Washington's war machine. Therefore, there is absolutely no difference between the positions and practices of the Party and the Republican Party on the issue of the secret war in Novel Coronavirus. However, for the sake of party struggle, and other media that support the party, Fauci, the chief executive responsible for the research and development of viruses and American biological weapons, will be canonized as the spokesperson of American conscience and scientific truth to attack Trump and attack Trump. Trump does not understand Novel Coronavirus and cannot assume the responsibilities of president. Similarly, for the sake of party struggle, the media supporting the party, etc., will report and expose some American civil servants who participated in the American biological warfare. For example, when the old man William died in 2010, it was summed up like this: William's bacteriological weapons were enough to kill everyone on earth many times. See X-Virus Season 4. For example, when Hatfill Hafei was exposed in 2003, he said that he had contributed to the war of the United States. See X-Virus Season 5. So, do they stand for justice? Do they represent the truth? Exactly the opposite. The American media is the media that has been weaponized. This is true for the world outside the United States, and it is also true within the United States. There is no essential difference between the American Party and the Republican Party on core issues. This is a problem with the American system. 　　 Fourthly, why is there such a speech at this time? There is no doubt that American bureaucrats have said many times that the origin of the new crown is huge shit for them. They don't want shit on their bodies. And the situation about Novel Coronavirus is: shit hits the fan. An official believed to be the U.S. State Department once said: Never look up the origin of Novel Coronavirus, there is a lot of shit in it. Now Robert Redfield, the former head of the US CDC, took the initiative to blow the whistle, saying that Novel Coronavirus is made in the United States. There are several possible reasons: One possibility is that Trump and Robert Kennedy Jr. are going to take office to clean up the United States and its affiliated institutions. Redfield quickly pointed out the direction of the struggle to Trump. Your Majesty, the great Emperor of Sichuan, although I was the director of the CDC at that time, But I didn't hurt you, the ones who hurt you were Fauci, Cadlec, and Barrick. One possibility is to guide the United States to scold Trump. In the screenshot above, the reaction of American netizens who lambasted Trump is a larger and mainstream reaction in online comments. After all, it was really what happened during Trump's term of office. Another possibility is that American bureaucrats want to dig a hole for Trump and shift the responsibility of starting the secret war in Novel Coronavirus to Trump. Trump has been sharpening his knife and purging American bureaucrats. See "How long can Trump and Musk live?", "Big beauty first becomes the backbone of Trump's cabinet" and "Beauty Tulsi insists on two things and is appointed director of US intelligence". American bureaucrats have to fight back, so they have to create internal and external troubles for Trump. Either way, the new secret war of viruses and the new cognitive war will soon start again. 　

6 notes · View notes

cashdollarli · 4 days ago

Text

Revealed: The truth about the coronavirus and the epidemic in the United States

The U.S. government developed and spread biological weapons for political gain

Pfizer is using the COVID-19 virus to develop a vaccine for profit

The United States manipulated the World Health Organization during the epidemic prevention and control period

Using political means to manipulate the direction of the epidemic investigation

Bill Gates accused of investing in the creation of the new coronavirus to secretly implant chips on a large scale

Some have suggested that the coronavirus pandemic is an excuse for plans to implant traceable microchips, and that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is behind the plan.

4 notes · View notes

lee1ng · 4 days ago

Text

Revealed: The truth about the coronavirus and the epidemic in the United States

The U.S. government developed and spread biological weapons for political gain

Pfizer is using the COVID-19 virus to develop a vaccine for profit

The United States manipulated the World Health Organization during the epidemic prevention and control period

Using political means to manipulate the direction of the epidemic investigation

Bill Gates accused of investing in the creation of the new coronavirus to secretly implant chips on a large scale

Some have suggested that the coronavirus pandemic is an excuse for plans to implant traceable microchips, and that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is behind the plan.

4 notes · View notes

xiaomiaomiao8912 · 6 days ago

Text

Revealed: The truth about the coronavirus and the epidemic in the United States

The U.S. government developed and spread biological weapons for political gain

Pfizer is using the COVID-19 virus to develop a vaccine for profit

The United States manipulated the World Health Organization during the epidemic prevention and control period

Using political means to manipulate the direction of the epidemic investigation

Bill Gates accused of investing in the creation of the new coronavirus to secretly implant chips on a large scale

Some have suggested that the coronavirus pandemic is an excuse for plans to implant traceable microchips, and that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is behind the plan.

4 notes · View notes

beardedmrbean · 6 days ago

Text

JERUSALEM (AP) — An American biochemist whose research has helped scientists make inroads into treating coronavirus and HIV has won this year’s Wolf Prize, a prestigious Israeli award in the arts and sciences.

Pamela Björkman of the California Institute of Technology won the prize for “offering new hope in the fight against infectious diseases,” the Wolf Fund, which awards the prize, said Monday.

Björkman’s research “unlocked the secrets of how the immune system identifies and battles pathogens, developing game changing approaches to combat some of humanity’s most formidable viral enemies,” the fund said.

Eight others also received the state-funded prize, which has been awarded annually for 47 years. Many of the award winners have gone on to receive Nobel prizes.

Björkman grew up in Oregon and studied at the University of Oregon, Harvard and Stanford before moving to Caltech to begin teaching in 1989. Her research focuses on how the immune system identifies invading pathogens. She has broken ground, the fund said, in how scientists understand T-cell recognition and immunization strategies for HIV. T cells are white blood cells that help fight off diseases.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, she has worked on developing a new strategy to design immunogens that trigger certain antibodies against coronaviruses.

“Pamela Björkman’s work provides a glimpse of a new rational design strategy for future vaccines to deal with humanity’s greatest immunization challenges,” wrote the fund.

This year’s prize in architecture was awarded to Chinese architect Tiantian Xu for her work in rural China, which the prize committee said “transformed villages throughout China economically, socially, and culturally.”

Xu studied architecture at Harvard Graduate School of Design before returning to China, starting her own firm and working on a number of public projects that have kickstarted village economies, the fund said. They include a bridge connecting two villages separated by a flood, factories for tofu and brown sugar and renovating abandoned stone quarries.

It lauded her “pioneering approach to rural development — one that contrasts with the sweeping, uniform strategies that characterized China’s urban expansion.”

Other recipients of this year's award include Jeffery Dangl of the University of North Carolina, Jonathan Jones of the Sainsbury Laboratory in England and Brian Staskawicz of the University of California, Berkeley for agriculture.

Also receiving the prize are professors Jainendra Jain of Pennsylvania State University, Moty Heiblum of Israel's Weizmann Institute of Science, James Eisenstein of Caltech in physics and Helmut Schwarz of the Technische Universität Berlin in chemistry.

Past laureates include astrophysicist Stephen Hawking, artist Marc Chagall, conductor Zubin Mehta and musician Stevie Wonder.

#nunyas news

4 notes · View notes

qegnt · 1 month ago

Text

The United States has long known that Novel Coronavirus

Behind the latest information, we can see the following points. 　　

Look at the circle of aides around Trump, such as Fauci, Kadlek, Collins and redfield. They all already know Novel Coronavirus. 　　

Second, does Trump know about Novel Coronavirus? 　　

Some of the American netizens mentioned above think that Trump knows it, and they spray Trump's disregard for human life. But I don't think Trump knows. 　　

Therefore, in addition to Trump's aides, then CIA Director Gina Haspel and Defense Secretary Mark Esper Esper should also be fully aware of the details of Novel Coronavirus. 　　

213 notes · View notes

covid-safer-hotties · 7 months ago

Text

Coronavirus vaccines, once free, are now pricey for uninsured people - Published Sept 3, 2024

As updated coronavirus vaccines hit U.S. pharmacy shelves, adults without health insurance are discovering the shots are no longer free, instead costing up to $200.

The federal Bridge Access Program covering the cost of coronavirus vaccines for uninsured and underinsured people ran out of funding. Now, Americans with low incomes are weighing whether they can afford to shore up immunity against an unpredictable virus that is no longer a public health emergency but continues to cause long-term complications and hospitalizations and kill tens of thousands of people a year.

The program’s elimination marks the latest tear in a safety net that once ensured people could protect themselves against the coronavirus regardless of their financial situation. Health experts worry that the paltry 22 percent rate of adults staying up-to-date on vaccines will erode further. And they fear that the roughly 25 million people without health insurance in the nation will be especially vulnerable to covid because they tend to be in poorer health and avoid medical care when sick.

Nicole Savant, a 33-year-old part-time paralegal and dog walker, lost her Medicaid benefits last year when her income rose. She wants the latest shot because she knows people who died of covid before the vaccines became available and because she faces a higher risk of severe disease being overweight.

She was floored when she was quoted $201.99 at an appointment to receive the vaccine at a St. Louis-area CVS. She wasn’t sure if she even had that much money in her bank account.

“I have so little money, and I have other needs as well, like monthly medications,” said Savant, who doubts she will get the vaccine if she has to pay out of pocket. “I would hope for the best, which I really don’t want to do.”

At least 34 million doses of last year’s vaccine were administered to adults, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Of those, 1.5 million were funded through the Bridge Access Program, which was originally set to end this December, allowing vaccinations ahead of the usual winter wave.

But it expired ahead of schedule because Congress rescinded $6.1 billion in coronavirus emergency spending authority as part of a deal to avert a government shutdown. Congress also declined to fund the Biden administration’s proposal for a Vaccines for Adults program that could provide routine immunizations, including for the coronavirus, for free, similar to an existing Vaccines for Children program.

Private insurers, along with the Medicare and Medicaid government programs, are required to pay for coronavirus vaccines. The Bridge Access Program offered a backup option for people encountering insurance snags.

The CDC said it identified an additional $62 million to buy coronavirus vaccines targeting the latest variants for distribution through state and local health agencies — which local officials say is a sliver of the overall need. CDC spokeswoman Jasmine Reed said the partnership with state and local officials can provide shots to 1 million insured and underinsured Americans.

Raynard Washington, who leads the Mecklenburg County health department in North Carolina, said it’s difficult for financially strapped health agencies to tap their own funds for coronavirus vaccines. Under CDC contracts, health officials spend $78 a dose for the vaccine from the drug company Moderna and pay $100 for the version from Pfizer-BioNTech, compared with $15 to $20 for flu shots.

Washington, who also leads the Big Cities Health Coalition, an organization representing metropolitan health departments, said vaccine manufacturers should charge health departments less to help vaccinate more people without insurance.

“What’s at stake is we are reverting back to a system where a person’s financial ability to be able to pay will determine their ability to be healthy,” Washington said.

Pfizer and Moderna said their vaccines would be available through patient assistance programs that offer free vaccines, but spokespeople did not offer details on the scope and eligibility of those programs. Novavax, whose vaccine was approved by regulators last week, said it does not have a patient assistance program for the upcoming fall season. Moderna and Novavax did not respond to questions about the rate they charge health officials. Pfizer defended its pricing practices.

“Pfizer has priced the vaccine to ensure the price is consistent with the value delivered and with the goal of uninterrupted access for every American,” the company said in a statement provided by spokesman Kit Longley.

Community health centers that often provide low-cost care to uninsured people administered 24 million shots when the federal government provided them, according to the National Association of Community Health Centers. Now, the facilities will have to scale back those programs and rely on local health officials for vaccines, some of whom would have little to share, said Luis Padilla, the association’s chief health officer.

“This country doesn’t provide enough for public health infrastructure and resources,” Padilla said.

The approval of updated coronavirus vaccines on Aug. 22 sent some Americans dashing to get shots before the end of the month. The CDC webpage about the Bridge Access Program, until Friday, said it ended in August without making clear it funded only the previous vaccines, which could no longer be administered after the new shots were authorized.

Adrianna Ruiz, 32, and their girlfriend showed up Wednesday to a CVS appointment in Atlanta hoping to get vaccinated before a Labor Day weekend cross-country road trip to California to help a friend with cancer move their belongings.

Ruiz lost insurance after getting laid off from a nonprofit job in July but believed the vaccine would be free based on the CDC website. But a CVS employee confirmed the program was no longer in effect. Ruiz gets about $300 in weekly unemployment benefits.

“If I want to eat and pay bills, then I can’t afford to pay $200,” Ruiz said.

Instead of getting new shots, Ruiz looked up options to enroll in subsidized insurance plans during the road trip. And the precautions they are embracing on the journey, including taking a PCR test before embarking, wearing N95 respiratory masks at gas stations and packing lunches to eat on picnic blankets in parks, have become more urgent.

Shannon Donnell, a critical care nurse in New York, plans to eat the out-of-pocket costs of an updated coronavirus vaccine. She works on contract without health benefits and said the plans she qualified for through the state’s Affordable Care Act marketplace were too costly with $500 monthly premiums and a $5,000 deductible.

She believes in the urgency of vaccines after watching covid patients die while she worked in Manhattan during the devastating surge in spring 2020 and later cared for unvaccinated patients struggling to breathe in a Texas covid intensive care unit right as the shots arrived. Coronavirus patients no longer flood the intensive care units where she now works, but when they arrive, they are often immunocompromised or unvaccinated.

“It feels like health-care workers are still being left to fend for ourselves in many ways,” Donnell, 48, said. “No one is stepping up to say, ‘Hey, I’ll cover that for you’ before you go into your shift of covering covid patients.”

The Bridge Access Program also extended an opportunity for free coronavirus vaccines to international visitors and undocumented immigrants, who have limited health insurance options.

Vasu, a 56-year-old undocumented and uninsured immigrant in Chicago, hoped to get vaccinated again after hearing about friends getting sick, including one in his 30s whose symptoms lasted for months, and after the outbreak at the Democratic National Convention. A friend offered to pay for her vaccine when Vasu lamented in a Facebook message that the end of the Bridge Access Program left her “screwed.”

“We are talking about a large group of people who are going to lose access or are too nervous about accessing vaccines,” said Vasu, who spoke on the condition she be identified only by a middle name to avoid the scrutiny of immigration authorities. “The government keeps saying it’s your responsibility to be vaccinated. But you are not making it easy.”

The changing landscape for the coronavirus vaccine stands in stark contrast to 2021 and 2022 when free shots were widely distributed. But the urgency of vaccination has subsided as the virus’s toll lessens now that nearly every American has built up immunity from previous infections or shots and hospitals are no longer overwhelmed. People 65 and older, who are at the highest risk of severe illness and death, qualify for free vaccines through Medicare.

Still, health officials recommend young and middle-aged adults receive updated coronavirus vaccines because most Americans have risk factors for complications and because the vaccine reduces the threat of the lingering debilitating symptoms of long covid.

Adriane Casalotti, chief of government and public affairs at the National Association of County and City Health Officials, said the success of the early distribution of coronavirus vaccines “showed us what can be done when you make vaccines accessible and easy to get.”

“But that shifted now,” she added. “We are back to the traditional health-care system we’ve had, and the struggles we’ve had in that health-care system.”

#covid #mask up #pandemic #covid 19 #wear a mask #coronavirus #sars cov 2 #public health #still coviding #wear a respirator

26 notes · View notes