#nocetero

[beyond-mogai-pride-flags]

▪ap

This is the gai for girls and boys flag!

The flag is explicitly meant for any nonbinary person (no matter what their alignment) who feels their attraction to girls and boys to be gai.

@beyond-mogai-pride-flags​​ @arco-pluris​​ @mogaiflagswithbenton​​ @uncommongenders​​ @ask-pride-color-schemes​​ @just-a-mogai-blog​

((Sequoia))

[beyond-mogai-pride-flags]

Nolin- Pride Flag

Nolin-/Nole-: attraction to people who aren’t androgynous. LIN stands for Androgyny In Nature.

See also: nocetero-, nonin- ~ AP

[momma-mogai-sphinx]

Hey! I've come to realize that I have no clue what my gender and sexuality are? Could I have some advice on what it might be, please? I love love LOVE vampires mostly, theatre, some science fiction, and things that scream the word "Glamour". I like both men and women, but heavily prefer men. I like to present femininely, not like any female-aligned genders/afab women, but just, feminine. Hope this can help!

Sure thing!

So, I’ll start with your orientation first since that might be a bit easier. If you’re attracted to both men and women, then bi- or nocetero- could work for you. There’s the juvelic system (scapolitian - nblw/m), though I’m not sure if there’s a juvelic term for “nblm, sometimes nblw.” There are also monoflexible terms (ma/androflexible would probably apply best to you). Hope that helps to give you an idea of what label(s) you might like to use!

Now as for your gender, it’s important to remember that gender and personality aren't usually regarded as the same thing. A gender identity is a deeply personal, partly psychological, and partly sociocultural identity (at least the way I use it, lol); and while it’s true that you’re the only one who can define it, having an intense interest in something does not necessarily constitute a gender identity. That being said, if vampirism, theatre, and sci-fi do feel like an important part of your identity, then I can certainly help you find some terms that are right for you.

Firstly, if moviegender, bookgender, and showgender are all in use, then I don’t see why theatregender can’t be a thing.

Theatregender - a gender only felt when experiencing a piece of theatre, or in some way connected to theatre. The label can be altered to be a specific piece of theatre. (Note: this was already coined as a “joke,” but can be reclaimed if you’re comfortable with that knowledge)

On the other hand, book-, movie-, and showgender were all created by a troll, so you could always coin something else if that puts you off. Perhaps theatritic? Theatrean?

For sci-fi, I wasn’t able to find anything related to that specifically, but again, coining your own term is never out of the question. Sci-figender, sci-fic, sci-fian, ...

There’s also vampirigender, and the closest thing I could find to a “glamorous” gender was aesigender (I'll bet there are other aesthetigenders that could work, I just can't seem to find them).

I’m not sure if peacock has a non-diamoric, non-exclusively outherine counterpart, but if it does, that could work for your gender presentation along with femininity.

And lastly, I should clarify first that “feminine��� is not a gender; you can identify as anything, and still express your gender however you want. But if you feel that your gender is deeply influenced by femininity, then just about any FINgender could do. There’s comfemmegender, femgender, nonpuella/nonera, dulcigender, ceterofeminine, lunettian, neularian (which is an alignment, but can be used like a gender identity), librafeminine, femfluid, faesari, and more.

I hope this was helpful!

[beyond-mogai-pride-flags]

What about salietian? ~ ap

A flag for those who are Sapphic (wlw) and Julietian (wlm). I don’t know what to call it yet, so I’d like some help with coining a term. @beyond-mogai-pride-flags @uncommongenders

[beyond-mogai-pride-flags]

Some possibilities:

Noenboric: an umbrella term for everyone NOT attracted to non-binary people.

Binary- having attraction to male or female.

Nocetero- feeling attracted to binary individuals.

Suptiliscapolitian: suptilic scapolitian; being strictly nblm and nblw; a nb experiencing static and stable attraction to both men and women.

Suptilinibian: suptilic nibian; suptically nblb (nonbinary loving binaries).

Suptilicity may not specify exclusive gender-based attraction (juvelic exclusivism/exclusivity), but helps with strictness (non-flexibility and precision) saying you are exactly that.

- Ap

[lgbtqiarchive]

List of things I count as conformancy: perioriented hetero-/hetro-, mono-, zed-/allo-/z-, nocetero- binian (blb/binary-loving-binary), gender/pronoun conforming, suptilic suptilian, monogender comgender, perisex/endosex/dyadic infrasex protsex/protosex, imperialized/traditionalist/colonized monoamorous monogamous monofidelity, cis-passing cisgender cissex(ual) clc (cis relations) and straight-passing sls (straight loving straight relations).

Obviously you can be not one of these things and still not identify as variant but I think it's good to point out.

You also forget to put sex-ness in the def, mentioning idpol vs biopolitics.

(I will make a shortened post with flags soon, please reblog that one instead bc I’m gonna link to this one for more info)

Alright. It’s taken me a while to make this, because it’s a term concept I want to properly and clearly describe. This is a community that basically already exists, and it’s meant to be different from acronym community terms like LGBT, LGBTQIA , MOGAI, or QUILTBAG. Those community terms are not bad, and they are valid communities in their own right that should continue to thrive, but this approach to describing “the community” as a complete, inclusive whole involves ditching acronyms. Acronym communities are basically pre-primed for intercommunity discourse and exclusionism because the acronyms are literally a fixed, finite list of who gets allowed to be in the community instead of a flexible, existing concept that includes people based on their shared experiences of being marginalized. Not oppressed, marginalized. There are no oppression debates in this community because there is an understanding that marginalization is what actually forms the community- it forms from those who are pushed away from the cis-het-allo-whatever/conformant society into the margins of society because of their identity. That’s the bottom line to me when I think of who I consider part of “the community”. Anyways, explanation over, here we go:

Variant: not completely conforming to the societal and cultural ideals or roles of gender, orientation, sexuality, relationships, and other related forms of self-identification. Not being accepted as a member of conformant society due to one’s identity differing from the one assigned to and expected of them.

“Conformant” is the antonym- not being variant-  because cisheteroalloperisexmonogamous(screaming for 11 minutes) is too long and I don’t want to keep shortening it to cis/het because some variants are both cis and het, but variant in another way like gender nonconformity or non-monoamory.

If there’s confusion on what is or isn’t variant, the flag is meant to include basically everyone, even obscure variants, and those identities will be listed in the stripe/flag/color meanings. Just wait for me to post it. I didn’t want these paragraphs to muck up the official. easily readable term/flag post.

(!tw mentions of nonconsensuality and animal abuse below!)

The things variant does NOT EVER include or describe (other than conformants of course) are (NO)MAPs, zoophiles, zoosadists, toucherists, (noncon)exhibitionists, and anyone else who excuses non-consensual, harmful violations of relational decency and respect as a part of their “identity” or “orientation” instead of a serious problem that should not be excused away under any circumstances. Just to be clear, this includes those with “interests” in “art” of those situations, not just people who target real beings.

(Do not interact unless you’re another inclusionist/positivity/neolabel acceptance blog)

[arco-pluris]

I know ambi-, nocetero- and nonin- but I don't know a specific one for nonbinary multigender people yet.

is there a word for someone who is nblw, wlw, mlw, nblm, mlm, and wlm? im not sure if mlw and wlm are actual words folks use but mlw for men who love women and wlm for women who love men..

I don’t believe there is currently a term for what you’re describing! The only combination gender/orientation identities I know of are iridian (w/nb loving w/nb), opalian (m/nb loving m/nb), and spinelian (m/nb loving w/nb).Followers please let us know if you know of a term for anon! Perhaps someone can coin one?-Mod Pluto