#no someone being a paraphile does not automatically make them radqueer
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
hi keep in mind that a lot of radqueers are paraphiles but not all paraphiles are radqueers
#.⎯♗·】#no someone being a paraphile does not automatically make them radqueer#no radqueers did not create paraphilias#no alot of paraphilies are not proud of the paras they have#alot of paraphiles are seeking help or trying to cope in HEALTHY ways#please have a little kindness for paraphiles in general we are not all evil and no not all paras are immoral#i beg of you#tw radqueer#cw radqueer#tw paraphilia#cw paraphilia#anti rq#anti radqueer#neu para#neutral para#anti-c#anti contact
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
This blog runner genuinely does not give a shit if proshippers interact with this blog. we do not give a fuck what people consume in their free time - even if it's problematic. It genuinely does not matter to us, we cannot muster the ability to give a shit.
However, if you harass people, no matter your reasoning, you aren't welcome here.
No, I do not care if they're pro-endo. Don't harass people. No, I don't care if they're a radqueer. Don't harass people. No, I don't care if they're into problematic content. It doesn't matter, don't harass people. You are a certified shit person if you do so.
An alarming number of blogs have followed us that publicly post death threats towards communities they deem problematic. They've all been blocked and will continue to be blocked if more follow our blogs. That behavior is never okay! You're more than allowed to not LIKE someone or even despise their community, but the second you cross the line into harassment and/or death threats, you're automatically the asshole.
We also, legitimately, do not care if you are a paraphile. A lot of paras are caused by trauma, and not all of them are even. Bad. Honestly. There are, of course, ones that are very, very much illegal to act on (pedophilia, necrophilia, zoophilia, otherwise known as The Big Three). So long as you don't act on it, in our book, you're golden.
Having a paraphilia doesn't automatically make you some evil being who shouldn't have rights, nor does it mean you are automatically evil. That's the purity culture talking. ignore that shit. Thought crimes don't exist. Acting on the big three is, however, a legitimate crime in many places and is. Morally not okay, in our personal opinion.
There are. Many. Many, many. Paraphilias that aren't. Even that bad. Honestly?? just reads as extreme kink, and there's fuckin. Nothing wrong with kink, even if extreme. Like. Please stop demonizing people for paraphilias they aren't harming you for just existing. A lot of them, or at least those with the big three, simply need support and help.
- signed mod tubbo_ whos. currently really tired of seeing so so many of our now ex followers calling for the death of people over fucking FICTION !!!! and more often than not DISORDERS / near disorders. Fuck off already. Argue with a wall.
28 notes
·
View notes
Note
Re: Last paraphilia anon (Sort of, more like continuing that convo)
Yeah, it is a really bad issue. Blocked a few anti-radqueer blogs for saying that all big three paraphilies deserve jail or death for being paraphilies and not their actions.
Like I get a lot of anti-radqueer people who are the most vocal are minors. But, you have to acknowledge that something that makes you uncomfy is not automatically harmful, especially being anti-contact for any harmful paraphilia. It's not just the three that are harmful- even paraphilias based on objects can be dependent on the consent of the person who owns the object or if practiced unsafely and without cleaning the object. Yes, I count harm to the paraphile as a harmful paraphilia, since that is so often overlooked with how distressing a paraphilia can be to experience.
It's ableist, really. The exact opposite extreme of radqueers when the situation needs more nuance than "Paraphilias ok except the three that make be feel icky then the paraphiles deserve to die." It's expected to see in extremes when you're a minor since you're still learning about the world and simplifying it makes it less scary and complex, but if you're going to try to present yourself as a safer alternative than a group that encourages contact and crimes, you cannot make a paraphilia an indicator of someone's morality or them being an inherent threat. It's rhetoric that has been used to demonize trauma victims for a long time, not just paraphiles.
TLDR: You can have a personal discomfort about specific groups, but it becomes an issue when you're telling a group to die or treat them as subhuman for something they cannot control having (but they can control their actions), and that needs to be unlearned. Not everything radqueers support is always part of their group or inherently evil due to their support of it. If anything, the combination of pro-contact any harmful paraphilia, applying queer identity fluidity to non-queer identities where it does not work the same way, not respecting closed or semi-closed cultures/practices, and idea that children and animals are able to consent should be bigger radqueer red flags than not demonizing paraphilias and paraphilic disorders.
like i said before the majority of people who says "big 3 kys" likely mean offenders or predators, again a missuse of words, dosent excuse all of it tho. but yeah i get what u mean and yeah other than the big 3 or what you said theres also like murder n r*pe paras too those are also harmful yaknow,
still this blog is very anti-contact n anti-abuse para friendly i believe so yeah
11 notes
·
View notes