#no free AZ water to saudis
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
muddypolitics · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
(via Maybe AZ AG Kris Mayes Didn't Cancel Tucker Carlson But She Did Save State's Water From Saudi Arabia - Wonkette)
We are so lucky that AZ voted for the real candidate and not the idiot election-denying MAGA boy.
you can see how this would have ended differently...
Arizona's new Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes is delivering on a campaign promise to rein in a Saudi Arabian alfalfa grower that had free access to the state's groundwater through a land lease. Although Arizona's drought conditions are improving, the state doesn't have a lot of water to spare, especially for shady governments.
Mayes tweeted last week, "Just 8 months ago, Arizona state agencies approved new deep-water wells in La Paz County for a Saudi-owned company to pump thousands of gallons of water per-minute. I can tell you that today — just before Earth Day — that's not happening. Those drill permits have been revoked."
1 note · View note
imr-riya · 2 years ago
Text
Protein Hydrolysate For Animal Feed Application Market - Growth, Trends, Covid-19 Impact, and Forecast (2022 - 2028)
Protein Hydrolysate for Animal Feed Application Market was valued at USD 542.50 million in 2021 and is expected to reach USD 960.30 million by the year 2028, at a CAGR of 8.5 %.
Protein hydrolysate is the product that is obtained by the breakdown of protein. Protein hydrolysate is a collective term called for long peptides, short peptides, and amino acids. Moreover, protein hydrolysate has shown remarkable effects in boosting the immune system and aiding in the digestion process of various animals. Furthermore, peptides present in hydrolysate have demonstrated qualities like antioxidant, anticoagulation, anti-microbial, anticancer, and antihypertension. The antimicrobial quality of protein hydrolysate prevents the growth of harmful bacteria in the gut of animals thus promoting the growth of helpful bacteria and an increase in feed uptake. The large and small peptides generated by hydrolysis of protein hydrolysate have shown both nutritional and physiological or regulatory functions in livestock, fish, and poultry thus, supporting the expansion of the market during the forecast period. The high quality of protein content in protein hydrolysate is associated with the proper growth and development of animal cells and also helps in boosting immunity. In addition, protein hydrolysate is organic and is environmentally friendly. Furthermore, with the growing awareness towards animal health and nutrition as well as to cut down the use of expensive antibiotics, livestock holders are switching to the use of organic and animal-friendly protein hydrolysate. Solubility of protein hydrolysate in a wide range of pH is an ideal characteristic that helps in improvised water holding, foaming, oil binding, and emulsifying properties.
The Protein Hydrolysate For Animal Feed Application Market analysis summary is a comprehensive examination of the present developments in many areas that are driving this vertical trend. Market share, applications, market size, statistics, and sales are all summarized in this report. Furthermore, this research highlights a detailed competition analysis of market possibilities, particularly growth plans as claimed by industry specialists. The Protein Hydrolysate For Animal Feed Application market report examines the competitive environment in terms of markets, applications, and regions to assist the vendor in determining a match or alignment between their strengths and future growth potential.
To learn more about this report, request a free sample copy:
https://introspectivemarketresearch.com/request/16036
Key Industry Players in Protein Hydrolysate For Animal Feed Application Market:
·         Copalis Sea Solutions (France)
·         GELITA AG (Germany)
·         Janatha Fish Meal & Oil Products (India)
·         Shenzhen Taier (China)
·         Hofseth BioCare ASA (Norway)
·         Bio-marine Ingredients Ireland (Ireland)
·         Scanbio Marine Group AS (Norway)
·         SOPROPÊCHE (France)
·         TripleNine (Denmark)
·         Aller Aqua (Denmark)
·         CRESCENT BIOTECH (India)
·         Kemin Industries Inc (US)
·         Azelis (Belgium) and other major players.
The protein hydrolysates for animal feed application market is segmented on the basis of source, form, livestock, technology and application. The growth amongst these segments will help you analyze meagre growth segments in the industries and provide the users with a valuable market overview and market insights to help them make strategic decisions for identifying core market applications.
Segmentation Analysis Includes,
By Technology:
·         Enzymatic Hydrolysis
·         Autolysis
·         Microbial Hydrolysis
·         Chemical Hydrolysis
By Livestock:
·         Poultry
·         Cattle
·         Aquatic
·         Swine
·         Other
By Form:
·         Powder
·         Granules
·         Paste
·         Liquid
By Sources:
·         Fish Source
·         Plant Source
·         Milk Source
·         Animal Source
By Region:
·         North America (U.S., Canada, Mexico)
·         Europe (Germany, U.K., France, Italy, Russia, Spain, Rest of Europe)
·         Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Rest of APAC)
·         Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Africa, Rest of MEA)
·         South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of SA)
 Will you have any doubt about this report? Please contact us on:   
https://introspectivemarketresearch.com/inquiry/16036
Reasons to purchase this report:
·         This ultimate guide will help you stay ahead in market as it furnishes you with the profiles of the key market players and their working methodologies and their decision-making capabilities.
·         The report analyzes various factors which act as drivers and restraints to development the overall Microplate Reader market.
·         This report not only analyzes present market condition but it likewise estimates how the Microplate Reader market is going to perform for estimated time period of 2028.
·         It enables you to adopt smart methodologies and form better decisions by giving a clear idea about customer’s requirement and preferences regarding the product in particular region.
Protein hydrolysates are processed food ingredient that is obtained by breaking down the proteins into smaller units called peptides and amino acids. These peptides and amino acids are easier to digest and are absorbed quickly by the body. This makes protein hydrolysates an ideal ingredient for use in infant formula, sports nutrition products, weight management supplements, and other medical foods.
Purchase This Report: -
https://introspectivemarketresearch.com/checkout/?user=1&_sid=16036
The protein hydrolysate market for animal feed has been segmented on the basis of technology, form, source, livestock, and region. Based on source, the market has further been segmented into fish protein hydrolysates, animal protein hydrolysates (bovine, poultry, pig, and other meat), plant protein hydrolysates (sunflower protein, soy protein, and others), and milk protein hydrolysates (casein and whey).
Related Report: -
https://introspectivemarketresearch.com/reports/fish-protein-hydrolysate-market/
About us:
Introspective Market Research (introspectivemarketresearch.com) is a visionary research consulting firm dedicated to assisting our clients to grow and have a successful impact on the market. Our team at IMR is ready to assist our clients to flourish their business by offering strategies to gain success and monopoly in their respective fields. We are a global market research company, that specializes in using big data and advanced analytics to show the bigger picture of the market trends. We help our clients to think differently and build better tomorrow for all of us. We are a technology-driven research company, we analyze extremely large sets of data to discover deeper insights and provide conclusive consulting. We not only provide intelligence solutions, but we help our clients in how they can achieve their goals.
Contact us:
Introspective Market Research
3001 S King Drive,
Chicago, Illinois
60616 USA
Ph no: +1-773-382-1047
Linkedin| Twitter| Facebook
0 notes
168699 · 2 years ago
Text
Iron Peptonate Market, Global Outlook and Forecast 2022-2028
Iron peptonate is a light brown powder, soluble in water, refined from casein by trypsin hydrolysis. As the main raw material of microbial culture medium, it is widely used in the fields of antibiotics, pharmaceutical industry, fermentation industry, biochemical products and microbiology scientific research.
This report contains market size and forecasts of Iron Peptonate in global, including the following market information:
Global Iron Peptonate Market Revenue, 2017-2022, 2023-2028, ($ millions)
Global Iron Peptonate Market Sales, 2017-2022, 2023-2028, (Tons)
Global top five Iron Peptonate companies in 2021 (%)
Download FREE Sample of this Report @
https://www.24chemicalresearch.com/download-sample/179622/global-iron-peptonate-forecast-market-2022-2028-601
The global Iron Peptonate market was valued at million in 2021 and is projected to reach US$ million by 2028, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period 2022-2028.
The U.S. Market is Estimated at $ Million in 2021, While China is Forecast to Reach $ Million by 2028.
Calcium Casein Peptone Segment to Reach $ Million by 2028, with a % CAGR in next six years.
The global key manufacturers of Iron Peptonate include Amyl Media Pty Ltd, Neogen Corporation, MP Biomedicals, Apollo Scientific, Merck, Carl Roth, Azelis Americas, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Biolife Italiana. etc. In 2021, the global top five players have a share approximately % in terms of revenue.
We has surveyed the Iron Peptonate manufacturers, suppliers, distributors and industry experts on this industry, involving the sales, revenue, demand, price change, product type, recent development and plan, industry trends, drivers, challenges, obstacles, and potential risks.
Total Market by Segment:
Global Iron Peptonate Market, by Type, 2017-2022, 2023-2028 ($ Millions) & (Tons)
Global Iron Peptonate Market Segment Percentages, by Type, 2021 (%)
Calcium Casein Peptone
Acid Casein Peptone
Others
Global Iron Peptonate Market, by Application, 2017-2022, 2023-2028 ($ Millions) & (Tons)
Global Iron Peptonate Market Segment Percentages, by Application, 2021 (%)
Pharmaceutical Industry
Fermentation Industry
Biochemical Products
Microbial Research
Others
Global Iron Peptonate Market, By Region and Country, 2017-2022, 2023-2028 ($ Millions) & (Tons)
Global Iron Peptonate Market Segment Percentages, By Region and Country, 2021 (%)
North America
US
Canada
Mexico
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Benelux
Rest of Europe
Asia
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Rest of Asia
South America
Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Israel
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of Middle East & Africa
Competitor Analysis
The report also provides analysis of leading market participants including:
Key companies Iron Peptonate revenues in global market, 2017-2022 (Estimated), ($ millions)
Key companies Iron Peptonate revenues share in global market, 2021 (%)
Key companies Iron Peptonate sales in global market, 2017-2022 (Estimated), (Tons)
Key companies Iron Peptonate sales share in global market, 2021 (%)
Further, the report presents profiles of competitors in the market, key players include:
Amyl Media Pty Ltd
Neogen Corporation
MP Biomedicals
Apollo Scientific
Merck
Carl Roth
Azelis Americas
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Biolife Italiana
Get the Complete Report & TOC @
https://www.24chemicalresearch.com/reports/179622/global-iron-peptonate-forecast-market-2022-2028-601
Table of content
1 Introduction to Research & Analysis Reports 1.1 Iron Peptonate Market Definition 1.2 Market Segments 1.2.1 Market by Type 1.2.2 Market by Application 1.3 Global Iron Peptonate Market Overview 1.4 Features & Benefits of This Report 1.5 Methodology & Sources of Information 1.5.1 Research Methodology 1.5.2 Research Process 1.5.3 Base Year 1.5.4 Report Assumptions & Caveats 2 Global Iron Peptonate Overall Market Size 2.1 Global Iron Peptonate Market Size: 2021 VS 2028 2.2 Global Iron Peptonate Revenue, Prospects & Forecasts: 2017-2028 2.3 Global Iron Peptonate Sales: 2017-2028 3 Company Landscape 3.1 Top Iron Peptonate Players in Global Market 3.2 Top Global Iron Peptonate Companies Ranked by Revenue 3.3 Global Iron Peptonate Revenue by Companies 3.4 Global Iron Peptonate Sales by Companies 3.5 Global Iron Peptonate Price by Manufacturer (2017-2022) 3.6 Top 3 and Top 5 Iron Peptonate Companies in Global Market, by Revenue in 2021 3.7 Global Manufacturers Iron Peptonate Product Type 3.8 Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 Iron Peptonate Players in Global Market 3.8.1 List of Global Tier 1 Iron Peptonate Companies 3.8.2 List of Global Tier 2 and Tier 3 Iron Peptonate Companies 4 Sights by Product 4.1 Overview 4.1.1 By Type - Global Iron Peptonate Market Size Markets, 2021 & 2028 4.1.2 Calcium Casein Peptone
CONTACT US:
North Main Road Koregaon Park, Pune, India - 411001.
International: +1(646)-781-7170
Asia: +91 9169162030
Follow Us On linkedin :-
https://www.linkedin.com/company/24chemicalresearch/
0 notes
vivekbajaj-grs · 3 years ago
Text
Global Positive Resist Strippers Market 2021 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2026
The Positive Resist Strippers market report provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, recent developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations.
According to our latest research, the global Positive Resist Strippers size is estimated to be xx million in 2021 from USD xx million in 2020, with a change of XX% between 2020 and 2021. The global Positive Resist Strippers market size is expected to grow at a CAGR of xx% for the next five years.
Download FREE Sample of this Report @ https://www.grandresearchstore.com/report-sample/global-positive-resist-strippers-2021-2026-328
Market segmentation
Positive Resist Strippers market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2016-2026, the growth among segments provide accurate calculations and forecasts for sales by Type and by Application in terms of volume and value. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets.
Market segment by Type, covers
Water-based
Not Water-based
Market segment by Application can be divided into
Semiconductor
Solar Energy
Others
The key market players for global Positive Resist Strippers market are listed below:
Dow
Entegris
Transene
RBP Chemical Technology Inc.
Daxin Materials
Technic
Nagase ChemteX Corporation
VWR
J.T.Baker
AZ
FUJIFILM
Solexir
Market segment by Region, regional analysis covers
North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)
Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, and Rest of Europe)
Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia, and Australia)
South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Rest of South America)
Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, South Africa, and Rest of Middle East & Africa)
The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 14 chapters:
Chapter 1, to describe Positive Resist Strippers product scope, market overview, market opportunities, market driving force and market risks.
Chapter 2, to profile the top manufacturers of Positive Resist Strippers, with price, sales, revenue and global market share of Positive Resist Strippers from 2019 to 2021.
Chapter 3, the Positive Resist Strippers competitive situation, sales, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast.
Chapter 4, the Positive Resist Strippers breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales, revenue and growth by regions, from 2016 to 2026.
Chapter 5 and 6, to segment the sales by type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2016 to 2026.
Chapter 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, to break the sales data at the country level, with sales, revenue and market share for key countries in the world, from 2016 to 2021.and Positive Resist Strippers market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2021 to 2026.
Chapter 12, 13 and 14, to describe Positive Resist Strippers sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion, appendix and data source.
Get the Complete Report & TOC @ https://www.grandresearchstore.com/chemicals-and-materials/global-positive-resist-strippers-2021-2026-328
Table of content
1 Market Overview 1.1 Positive Resist Strippers Introduction 1.2 Market Analysis by Type 1.2.1 Overview: Global Positive Resist Strippers Revenue by Type: 2019 Versus 2021 Versus 2026 1.2.2 Water-based 1.2.3 Not Water-based 1.3 Market Analysis by Application 1.3.1 Overview: Global Positive Resist Strippers Revenue by Application: 2019 Versus 2021 Versus 2026 1.3.2 Semiconductor 1.3.3 Solar Energy 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Global Positive Resist Strippers Market Size & Forecast 1.4.1 Global Positive Resist Strippers Sales in Value (2016-2026)) 1.4.2 Global Positive Resist Strippers Sales in Volume (2016-2026) 1.4.3 Global Positive Resist Strippers Price by Type (2016-2026) & (US$/Ton) 1.5 Global Positive Resist Strippers Production Capacity Analysis 1.5.1 Global Positive Resist Strippers Total Production Capacity (2016-2026) 1.5.2 Global Positive Resist Strippers Production Capacity by Geographic Region 1.6 Market Drivers, Restraints and Trends 1.6.1 Positive Resist Strippers Market Drivers 1.6.2 Positive Resist Strippers Market Restraints 1.6.3 Positive Resist Strippers Trends Analysis 2 Manufacturers Profiles 2.1 Dow 2.1.1 Dow Details 2.1.2 Dow Major Business 2.1.3 Dow Positive Resist Strippers Product and Services 2.1.4 Dow Positive Resist Strippers Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (201
CONTACT US: 276 5th Avenue, New York , NY 10001,United States International: (+1) 646 781 7170 / +91 8087042414 Email: [email protected] Follow Us On linkedin :- https://www.linkedin.com/company/grand-research-store/
0 notes
opedguy · 8 years ago
Text
Tillerson Signals No Change in Syria Policy
LOS ANGELES (OnlineColumnist.com), April 9, 2017.--Striking Syria’s Shayrat air base near Homs April 6 with 59 Cruise missles, 70-year-old Donald Trump threw the liberal media for a loop, after spending months calling the New York real estate tycoon a “Putin puppet.”  Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton did her best scaring voters into believing Trump had close ties to Moscow and could not be trusted. Trump’s Cruise missile attack on the Syrian air base from which Sarin nerve gas was dropped on the Syrian town of Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib Province silences his liberal critics, winning praise from practically everyone on Capitol Hill except Hillary’s former running mate Sen. Tim Caine (D-Va.).  Caine sounded off-the-wall, insisting Trump must get Congressional approval for any military action.  Under Article 2, Trump has the war-making power as commander-in-chief to protect U.S. national security.
            Trump emphatically stated April 6 that he ordered the strike to deal with al-Assad’s weapons of mass destruction, a threat to U.S. troops and its allies.  Caine’s critique fell on deaf ears in Congress and in the media, knowing the extreme partisan manner of his attack.  When it comes to protecting U.S. national security, Trump was well within his rights as commander-in-chief.  Trump’s Cruise missile strike brought temporary praise from his most vociferous detractor on Capitol Hill, Sen. John McCain (R-Az.), hoping the surgical strike was Trump’s commitment to continue the six-year-old Saudi proxy war started March 15, 2011 that’s killed over 300,000 Syrians, displaced millions more to neighboring countries and Europe, drove the U.K. out of the European Union and created the worst refugee crisis since WWII.  McCain urged Trump to escalate U.S. military involvement in Syria.
            Saying that Trump showed “strength” striking Syria, McCain urged Trump to follow up his pinpoint strikes with wider military intervention.  “But I would hope that we would reinvigorate our support for the Free Syrian Army, establishment of a no-fly zone, and move forward.”  Hillary echoed McCain’s sentiments.  “I really believe we should have and still should take out his air fields and prevent him [Bashar al-Assad] from being able to use them to bomb innocent people and drop Sarin gas on them,” Hillary told Women in the World Summit in Washington, D.C.  Hillary’s comments about setting up no-fly zones in Syria prompted former German Foreign Minister Frank Walter-Steinmeir to warn the world of possible WWIII.  Hillary’s remarks show her war-mongering tendencies would have pushed the U.S. and Russian closer to the brink of nuclear war.
            Clarifying the U.S. position on Syria, 65-year-old Secretary of State Rex Tillerson set the record straight on Trump’s Syria policy after Congress and the media jumped the gun.  “It’s important that we keep our priorities straight.  And we believe that the first priority is the defeat of ISIS,” Tillerson told CBS’s “Face the Nation,” tossing cold water on war hawks seeking to escalate the Syrian War.  Calling for “the whole stability in the region,” Tillerson telegraphed to McCain that Trump was not changing his Syrian policy. Trump campaigned on defeating ISIS, telling voters that dealing with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad must come later.  “Once the ISIS threat has been reduced or eliminated, I think we can turn our attention directly to stabilizing the situation in Syria,” said Tillerson, clarifying that the April 6 surgical strike was a message to al-Assad to stop using poison gas.
            Russian president Vladimir Putin rebuked Trump’s use of lethal force in Syria, denying that Syrian warplanes dropped Sarin nerve gas on Khan Sheikhoun.  “Putin views the U.S. strikes on Syria aggression against a sovereign state in violation of norms of international law and on a made up pretext.  Washington’s step will inflict major damage on U.S.-Russia ties,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.  Peskov knows that Trump deliberately avoided any strike on Russian targets, simply responding to al-Assad’s use of poised gas.  When the U.S. and Moscow dealt with al-Assad��s Aug. 21, 2013 poison gas attack in Ghouta, Syria, killing 281, injuring 3,600, Putin promised to remove all of al-Assad’s poison gas.  If al-Assad kept Sarin nerve gas or got it from Iran or some other third party, then Putin remains liable.  Kremlin officials know Trump responded only to al-Assad’s April 4 poison gas attack.
             Tillerson sent a clear message to Capitol Hill war hawks and the media that the White House has no plans to change its Syrian policy.  U.N. Amb. Nikki Haley said the White House is prepared to do more but only if al-Assad uses more poised gas.  Trump’s content to let al-Assad prosecute his fight against Syrian rebels as long as he avoids using chemical weapons or any weapons of mass destruction.  “Were hopeful that Russia will choose to play a constructive role in supporting ceasefires through their own Astana talks, but also, ultimately through Geneva,” Tillerson told Face the Nation.  Trump, Tillerson and 66-year-old Defense Secretary Gen James Mattis have their eyes on ISIS, not removing al-Assad from Damascus.  Whatever praise Trump got on Capitol Hill for his pinpoint Cruise missile strike, it’s bound to end once war hawks like McCain know Trump won’t back Syrian rebel groups.
About the Author    
John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He’s editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma.
0 notes