#meanwhile rocket is just a great version of that song in general
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
it sucks that possibly one of the best version of susumu hirasawa's solar ray has some of the worst audio quality i've ever heard in my life on an official album
#switch speaks#error CD is such a mixed bag of quality why is it one of his only spotify releases#like sekai turbine isnt one of my favorite performances of that song but the audio isn't as bad#meanwhile rocket is just a great version of that song in general#while the first half of solar ray sounds like it's fighting for its life#i get that it was a 1990 live recording but god damn
2 notes
¡
View notes
Photo
Blurring the Line.
As a new Space Jam film beams down to Earth, Kambole Campbell argues that a commitment to silliness and a sincere love for the medium is what it takes to make a great live-action/animation hybrid.
The live-action and animation hybrid movie is something of a dicey prospect. Itâs tricky to create believable interaction between whatâs real and whatâs drawn, puppeteered or renderedâand blending the live and the animated has so far resulted in wild swings in quality. It is a highly specific and technically demanding niche, one with only a select few major hits, though plenty of cult oddities. So what makes a good live-action/animation hybrid?
To borrow words from Hayao Miyazaki, âlive action is becoming part of that whole soup called animationâ. Characters distinct from the humans they interact with, but rendered as though they were real creatures (or ghosts), are everywhere lately; in Paddington, in Scooby Doo, in David Loweryâs (wonderful) update of Peteâs Dragon.
The original âPeteâs Dragonâ (1977) alongside the 2016 remake.
Loweryâs dragon is realized with highly realistic lighting and visual-effects work. By comparison, the cartoon-like characters in the 1977 Peteâs Dragonâalong with other films listed in Louiseâs handy compendium of Disneyâs live-action animationâare far more exaggerated. That said, thereâs still the occasional holdout for the classical version of these crossovers: this yearâs Tom and Jerry replicating the look of 2D through 3D/CGI animation, specifically harkens back to the shorts of the 1940s and â50s.
One type of live-action/animation hybrid focuses on seamless immersion, the other is interested in exploring the seams themselves. Elf (2003) uses the aberration of stop-motion animals to represent the eponymous character as a fish out of water. Ninjababy, a Letterboxd favorite from this yearâs SXSW Festival, employs an animated doodle as a representation of the protagonistâs state of mind while she processes her unplanned pregnancy.
Meanwhile, every Muppets film ever literally tears at the seams until weâre in stitches, but, for the sake of simplicity, puppets are not invited to this particular party. What we are concerned with here is the overlap between hand-drawn animation and live-action scenes (with honorable mentions of equally valid stop-motion work), and the ways in which these hybrids have moved from whimsical confections to nod-and-wink blockbusters across a century of cinema.
Betty Boop and Koko the clown in a 1938 instalment of the Fleischer brothersâ âOut of the Inkwellâ series.
Early crossovers often involve animators playing with their characters, in scenarios such as the inventive Out of the Inkwell series of shorts from Rotoscope inventor Max Fleischer and his director brother Dave. Things get even more interactive mid-century, when Gene Kelly holds hands with Jerry Mouse in Anchors Aweigh.
The 1960s and â70s deliver ever more delightful family fare involving human actors entering cartoon worlds, notably in the Robert Stevenson-directed Mary Poppins and Bedknobs and Broomsticks, and Chuck Jonesâ puntastic The Phantom Tollbooth.
Jerry and Gene dance off their worries in âAnchors Aweighâ (1945).
Mary Poppins is one of the highest-rated live-action/animation hybrids on Letterboxd for good reason. Its sense of control in how it engages with its animated creations makes itâstill!âan incredibly engaging watch. It is simply far less evil than the singinâ, dancinâ glorification of slavery in Disneyâs Song of the South (1946), and far more engaging than Victory Through Air Power (1943), a war-propaganda film about the benefits of long-range bombing in the fight against Hitler. The studioâs The Reluctant Dragon (1941) also serves a propagandistic function, as a behind-the-scenes studio tour made when the studioâs animators were striking.
By comparison, Mary Poppinsâ excursions into the painted worldâreplicated in Rob Marshallâs belated, underrated 2018 sequel, Mary Poppins Returnsâare full of magical whimsicality. âFilms have added the gimmick of making animation and live characters interact countless times, but paradoxically none as pristine-looking as this creation,â writes Edgar in this review. âThis is a visual landmark, a watershed⌠the effect of making everything float magically, to the detail of when a drawing should appear in front or the back of [Dick] Van Dyke is a creation beyond my comprehension.â (For Van Dyke, who played dual roles as Bert and Mr Dawes Senior, the experience sparked a lifelong love of animation and visual effects.)
Julie Andrews, Dick Van Dyke and penguins, in âMary Poppinsâ (1964).
Generally speaking, and the Mary Poppins sequel aside, more contemporary efforts seek to subvert this feeling of harmony and control, instead embracing the chaos of two worlds colliding, the cartoons there to shock rather than sing. Henry Selickâs frequently nightmarish James and the Giant Peach (1996) leans into this crossover as something uncanny and macabre by combining live action with stop motion, as its young protagonist eats his way into another world, meeting mechanical sharks and man-eating rhinos. Sally Jane Black describes it as âriding the Burton-esque wave of mid-â90s mall goth trends and blending with the differently demonic Dahl storyâ.
Science-classroom staple Osmosis Jones (2001) finds that within the human body, the internal organs serve as cities full of drawn white-blood-cell cops. The late Stephen Hillenburgâs The Spongebob Squarepants Movie (2004) turns its real-life humans into living cartoons themselves, particularly in a bonkers sequence featuring David Hasselhoff basically turning into a speedboat.
David Hasselhoff picks up speed in âThe Spongebob Squarepants Movieâ (2004).
The absurdity behind the collision of the drawn and the real is never better embodied than in another of our highest-rated live/animated hybrids. Released in 1988, Robert Zemeckisâ Who Framed Roger Rabbit shows off a deep understandingânarratively and aestheticallyâof the material that itâs parodying, seeking out the impeccable craftsmanship of legends such as director of animation Richard Williams (1993âs The Thief and the Cobbler), and his close collaborator Roy Naisbitt. The forced perspectives of Naisbittâs mind-bending layouts provide much of the rocket fuel driving the filmâs madcap cartoon opening.
Distributed by Walt Disney Pictures, Roger Rabbit utilizes the Disney stable of characters as well as the Looney Tunes cast to harken back to Americaâs golden age of animation. It continues a familiar scenario where the âtoons themselves are autonomous actors (as also seen in Friz Frelengâs 1940 short You Ought to Be in Pictures, in which Daffy Duck convinces Porky Pig to try his acting luck in the big studios).
Daffy Duck plots his rise up the acting ranks in âYou Ought to Be in Picturesâ (1940).
Through this conceit, Zemeckis is able to celebrate the craft of animation, while pastiching both Chinatown, the noir genre, and the mercenary nature of the film industry (âthe best part is⌠they work for peanuts!â a studio exec says of the cast of Fantasia). As Eddie Valiant, Bob Hoskinsâ skepticism and disdain towards âtoonsâ is a giant parody of Disneyâs more traditional approach to matching humans and drawings.
Adult audiences are catered for with plenty of euphemistic humor and in-jokes about the history of the medium. Itâs both hilarious (âthey⌠dropped a piano on him,â one character solemnly notes of his son) and just the beginning of Hollywood toying with feature-length stories in which people co-exist with cartoons, rather than dipping in and out of fantasy sequences. Itâs not just about how the cartoons appear on the screen, but how the human world reacts to them, and Zemeckis gets a lot of mileage out of applying âtoon lunacy to our world.
Bob Hoskins in âWho Framed Roger Rabbit?â (1988).
The groundbreaking optical effects and compositing are excellent (and Hoskinsâ amazing performance should also be credited for holding all of it together), but what makes Roger Rabbit such a hit is that sense of controlled chaos and a clever tonal weaving of violence and noirish seediness (âIâm not bad⌠Iâm just drawn that wayâ) through the cartoony feel. And it is simply very, very funny.
It could be said that, with Roger Rabbit, Zemeckis unlocked the formula for how to modernize the live-action and animation hybrid, by leaning into a winking parody of what came before. It worked so perfectly well that it helped kickstart the âDisney renaissance' era of animation. Roger Rabbit has influenced every well-known live-action/animation hybrid produced since, proving that there is success and fun to be had by completely upending Mary Poppins-esque quirks. Even Disneyâs delightful 2007 rom-com Enchanted makes comedy out of the idea of cartoons crossing that boundary.
When a cartoon character meets real-world obstacles.
Even when done well, though, hybrids are not an automatic hit. Sitting at a 2.8-star average, Joe Danteâs stealthily great Looney Tunes: Back in Action (2003) is considered by the righteous to be the superior live-action/animated Looney Tunes hybrid, harkening back to the world of Chuck Jones and Frank Tashlin. SilentDawn states that the film deserves the nostalgic reverence reserved for Space Jam: âFrom gag to gag, set piece to set piece, Back in Action is utterly bonkers in its logic-free plotting and the constant manipulation of busy frames.â
With its Tinseltown parody, Back in Action pulls from the same bag of tricks as Roger Rabbit; here, the Looney Tunes characters are famous, self-entitled actors. Dante cranks the meta comedy up to eleven, opening the film with Matthew Lillard being accosted by Shaggy for his performance in the aforementioned Scooby Doo movie (and early on throwing in backhanded jokes about the practice of films like itself as one character yells, âI was brought in to leverage your synergy!â).
Daffy Duck with more non-stop banter in âLooney Tunes: Back in Actionâ (2003).
Back in Action is even more technically complex than Roger Rabbit, seamlessly bringing Looney Tunes physics and visual language into the real world. Donât forget that Dante had been here before, when he had Anthony banish Ethel into a cartoon-populated television show in his segment of Twilight Zone: The Movie. Another key to this seamlessness is star Brendan Fraser, at the height of his powers here as âBrendan Fraserâs stunt doubleâ.
Like Hoskins before him, Fraser brings a wholehearted commitment to playing the fed-up straight man amidst cartoon zaniness. Fraser also brought that dedication to Henry Selick's Monkeybone (2001), a Roger Rabbit-inspired sex comedy that deploys a combo of stop-motion animation and live acting in a premise amusingly close to that of 1992âs Cool World (but more on that cult anomaly shortly). A commercial flop, Back in Action was the last cinematic outing for the Looney Tunes for some time.
Nowadays, when we think of live-action animation, itâs hard not to jump straight to an image of Michael Jordanâs arm stretching to do a half-court dunk to save the Looney Tunes from slavery. Thereâs not a lot that can be fully rationalized about the 1996 box-office smash, Space Jam. It is a bewildering cartoon advert for Michael Jordanâs baseball career, dreamed up off the back of his basketball retirement, while also mashing together different American icons. Never forget that the soundtrackâone that, according to Benjamin, âmakes you have to throw assââincludes a song with B-Real, Coolio, Method Man and LL Cool J.
Michael Jordan and teammates in âSpace Jamâ (1996).
Space Jam is a film inherently born to sell something, predicated on the existing success of a Nike commercial rather than any obvious passion for experimentation. But its pure strangeness, a growing nostalgia for the nineties, and meticulous compositing work from visual-effects supervisor Ed Jones and the filmâs animation team (a number of whom also worked on both Roger Rabbit and Back in Action), have all kept it in the cultural memory.
The films is backwards, writes Jesse, in that it wants to distance itself from the very cartoons it leverages: âThis really almost feels like a follow-up to Looney Tunes: Back in Action, rather than a predecessor, because it feels like someone watched the later movie, decided these Looney Tunes characters were a problem, and asked someone to make sure they were as secondary as possible.â That attempt to place all the agency in Jordanâs hands was a point of contention for Chuck Jones, the legendary Warner Bros cartoonist. He hated the film, stating that Bugs would never ask for help and would have dealt with the aliens in seven minutes.
Space Jam has its moments, however. Guy proclaims âthere is nothing that Deadpool as a character will ever have to offer that isnât done infinitely better by a good Bugs Bunny bitâ. For some, its problems are a bit more straightforward, for others itâs a matter of safety in sport. But the overriding sentiments surrounding the film point to a sort of morbid fascination with the brazenness of its concept.
Holli Would (voiced by Kim Basinger) and Frank Harris (Brad Pitt) blur the lines in âCool Worldâ (1992).
Existing in the same demented⌠space⌠as Space Jam, Paramount Pictures bought the idea for Cool World from Ralph Bakshi as it sought to have its own Roger Rabbit. While Brad Pitt described it as âRoger Rabbit on acidâ ahead of release, Cool World itself looks like a nightmare version of Toontown. The film was universally panned at the time, caught awkwardly between being far too adult for children but too lacking in any real substance for adults (thereâs something of a connective thread between Jessica Rabbit, Lola Bunny and Holli Would).
Ralph Bakshiâs risquĂŠ and calamitously horny formal experiment builds on the animatorâs fascination with the relationship between the medium and the human body. Of course, he would go from the immensely detailed rotoscoping of Fire and Ice (1983) to clashing hand-drawn characters with real ones, something he had already touched upon in the seventies with Heavy Traffic and Coonskin, whose animated characters were drawn into real locations. But no one besides Bakshi quite knew what to do with the perverse concept of Brad Pitt as a noir detective trying to stop Gabriel Byrneâs cartoonist from having sex with a character that he drewâan animated Kim Basinger.
Jack Deebs (Gabriel Byrne) attempts to cross over to Hollie Would in âCool Worldâ (1992).
Cool Worldâs awkwardness can be attributed to stilted interactions between Byrne, Pitt and the animated world, as well as studio meddling. Producer Frank Mancuso Jr (who was on the film due to his father running Paramount) demanded that the film be reworked into something PG-rated, against Bakshiâs wishes (he envisioned an R-rated horror), and the script was rewritten in secret. It went badly, so much so that Bakshi eventually punched Mancuso Jr in the face.
While Cool World averages two stars on Letterboxd, there are some enthusiastic holdouts. There are the people impressed by the insanity of it all, those who just love them a horny toon, and then there is Andrew, a five-star Cool World fan: âOn the surface, itâs a Lovecraftian horror with Betty Boop as the villain, featuring a more impressive cityscape than Blade Runner and Dick Tracy combined, and multidimensional effects that make In the Mouth of Madness look like trash. The true star, however, proves to be the condensed surplus of unrelated gags clogging the arteries of the screenâin every corner is some of the silliest cel animation that will likely ever be created.â
There are even those who enjoy its âclear response to Who Framed Roger Rabbitâ, with David writing that âthe film presents a similar concept through the lens of the darkly comic, perverted world of the underground cartoonistsâ, though also noting that without Bakshiâs original script, the film is âa series of half steps and never really commits like it couldâ. Cool World feels both completely deranged and strangely low-energy, caught between different ideas as to how best to mix the two mediums. But it did give us a David Bowie jam.
âSpace Jam: A New Legacyâ is in cinemas and on HBO Max now.
Craft is of course important, but generally speaking, maybe nowadays a commitment to silliness and a sincere love for the mediumâs history is the thing that makes successful live-action/animation hybrids click. Itâs an idea that doesnât lend itself to being too cool, or even entirely palatable. The trick is to be as fully dotty as Mary Poppins, or steer into the gaucheness of the concept, Ă la Roger Rabbit and Looney Tunes: Back in Action.
Itâs quite a tightrope to walk between good meta-comedy and a parade of references to intellectual property. The winningest strategy is to weave the characters into the tapestry of the plot and let the gags grow from there, rather than hoping their very inclusion is its own reward. Wait, you said what is coming out this week?
Related content
Rootfish Jonesâs list of cartoons people are horny for
The 100 Sequences that Shaped Animation: the companion list to the Vulture story
Jose Morenoâs list of every animated film made from 1888 to the present
Follow Kambole on Letterboxd
#kambole campbell#mary poppins#ralph bakshi#hayao miyazaki#ghibli#disney#who framed roger rabbit#roger rabbit#spongebob squarepants#spongebob#animation#live action animation#live action animation hybrid#stop motion animation#stop motion#wes anderson#brad pitt#bob hoskins#genre#space jam#space jam a new legacy#michael jordan#lebron james#looney tunes#bugs bunny#daffy duck#warner bros#2d animation#letterboxd
26 notes
¡
View notes
Text
sun records cmt chad michael murray
Sun Records: Elvis Presley As The Captain America Of Rock CMT is selling Sun Records as the saga of Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, and Jerry Lewis as the revolutionary first generation of rock & roll, but the show is really about Sam Phillips, founder of the record label that recorded them all, Sun Records, in 1950s Memphis. Phillips is played by Chad Michael Murray as a poor but stubborn innovator, determined to build a company around a new sound that would combine black rhythm & blues with white country music to forge both an art form and a money-maker.
Based loosely on the hit Broadway musical The Million Dollar Quartet, Sun Recordsâpremiering Thursday after Nashville��takes its very leisurely time getting to the exciting-rock-&-roll part of this drama. As though the producers were mounting a musical version of The Avengers, we get the origin stories of all the principals. Elvis (Drake Milligan)âthe eventual Captain America of rock & roll, straight-edged and nobleâis a poor, shy Mississippi farm boy whose mother, Gladys, sees his potential early on. Jerry Lee (Christian Lees) is a cocky Louisiana piano-player who pounds out tunes with the cautious encouragement of his highly religious cousin Jimmy (Jonah Lees). Johnny Cash (Kevin Fontaine) is an aimless Arkansas rebel who enlists in the Air Force and is stationed in Germany.
Meanwhile, Sam Phillips is back at the ramshackle Memphis Recording Service, trying to make a go of it without much success. The TV show plays up a hazy historical factâthat Sam probably had an affair with his office assistant, Marion Keisker (Margaret Anne Florence). She is more firmly embedded in history as the person who first noticed Elvisâs star potential when he wandered into Sun to record a birthday record for his mom.
youtube
I should say that this last detail has not yet been dramatized in Sun Records in the four episodes made available to criticsâas I said, the pace of this show about lively music is really slow. It is also so light on context, I cannot imagine what viewers unfamiliar with 1950s rock can make of it. Will the audience for Sun Records realize, just to take one example, that Jerry Lee Lewisâs cousin is the nascent Jimmy Swaggart, soon to become one of the most prominent conservative televangelists ever?
Mike & Mollyâs Billy Gardell dominates a lengthy subplot about a blustery carnival barker whoâll become Col. Tom Parker, eventual manager of Elvis. But here, heâs just a hustler who lucks into managing the career of Eddy Arnold (Trevor Donovan), a smooth-voiced crooner who deserves better than to be portrayed as a mere goody-goody pushed aside for the rock revolution. By the fourth episode, Parker isnât anywhere near Elvis yetâheâs just signed up Hank Snow, played by the excellent singer Pokey LaFarge, and again, Sun Records gives no context for Snow, a great Canadian country star, billed as âthe Singing Ranger.â He and Arnold are rendered as mere yokels who must give way to the rise of rock & roll, and that just ainât the way it happened, kids.
The show tries to be mindful of the racial aspect of this history. The fourth member of what would become the Million Dollar Quartet, Carl Perkins, doesnât even appear in the episodes Iâve seen. Instead, we get the story of how Ike Turner (Kerry Holliday)ânow a villain in history for his spousal abuse of Tina Turner, but at this point in his life a vital, imaginative musicianârecorded the song âRocket 88â in 1951 with his band the Kings of Rhythm. He had his glory robbed from him when Chess Records released it under the name of the songâs vocalist, Ikeâs saxophonist Jackie Brenston, and the band re-named the Delta Cats. Youâd never guess from this show that âRocket 88â is frequently considered the first hit in the then-new genre dubbed rock & roll.
Repetitious (okay, we get it: Sam Phillips had an unhappy marriage and made out with Marion as frequently as possible) and clumsy in its lurch from one disparate subplot to another (after four episodes, none of the legendary rockers has yet recorded for Sun, let alone met each other), Sun Records is such a slow burn, itâs kind of a fizzle.
Sun Records airs Thursdays at 10 p.m. on CMT.
Read more:âThis Is Usâ Recap: The Day The Music DiedâThis Is Usâ Postmortem: Brian Tyree Henry Is Proud to Be Part of an Episode That Had âPeople Buying Kleenex by the PoundââColbertâ: Joe Scarborough Refuses to Call Trump âPresidentâ
#_revsp:wp.yahoo.tv.us#elvis presley#_uuid:d2e1f58e-1f19-3cc6-9b79-51b3f21308af#nashville#chad michael murray#sam phillips#cmt#_author:Ken Tucker#_lmsid:a0Vd000000AE7lXEAT#sun records
2 notes
¡
View notes