#maga is a fraudulent movement

[blackpilledkremlintsarina5294]

Everywhere, there are savages . It ain't just an Islam problem. It's obnoxious to imply that Muslims have the most abusive religion when abuse happens everywhere across the globe. Democrats and Republicans are a complete joke. The Democrats' evil are more out in the open, but they try to sugareoat that evil, whereas Republicans are more straightforward about their bigotry, but claim to be the saviors of the United States because they don't have as much power as the Democrats. Deep down, the Republicans wish to have as much power as the Democrats while the Democrats would like to deport illegals they have no use for.

[contemplatingoutlander]

All the Americans who died in WWII fighting fascism would be appalled by JD Vance's speech in Munich and his later meeting with the a neofascist AfD leader.

Vice President JD Vance urged European leaders on Friday to end the isolation of far-right parties across the continent, an extraordinary embrace of a once-fringe political movement with which the Trump administration shares a common approach on migration, identity and internet speech. [...] The vice president singled out his German hosts, telling them to drop their objections to working with a party that has often reveled in banned Nazi slogans and has been shunned from government as a result. He did not mention the party, the Alternative for Germany, or AfD, by name, but directly referred to the longstanding agreement by mainstream German politicians to freeze out the group, parts of which have been formally classified as extremist by German intelligence. “There is no room for firewalls,” Mr. Vance said, bringing some gasps in the hall. He punctuated the message by meeting on Friday with Alice Weidel, the AfD’s candidate for chancellor in this month’s election, as well as other German leaders. [...] Mr. Vance aggressively challenged the diplomats in the hall in Munich, telling them that their biggest security threat was not from China or Russia, but “the enemy within” — what he called their suppression of abortion protests and other forms of free speech.

It was breathtakingly hypocritical for Vance to scold Europe for not being true to its democratic ideals--much less to do so in a speech delivered in Germany, which in the mid-20th century had lost its democratic institutions because some Germans allowed Nazis to get a foothold in their government.

If you give fascists an inch, they will take a mile.

In his speech, Vance was indignant that Europe has erected "firewalls" against far-right political parties. Ignoring the fact that fascism took over Germany through a democratic, legal process. Specifically, once he became prime minister, it only took Hitler and his Nazi cronies 53 days to destroy the Weimar Republic through legal, constitutional means.

Germany in particular KNOWS if they give fascists an inch, they will take a mile.

It doesn't help Vance's case that in less than a month's time, Trump, Musk, and MAGA Republicans have taken a sledgehammer in the U.S. to the law and the Constitution, and appear to be trying to establish an autocratic if not downright neofascist state.

No politician has a "mandate" if they were elected because of disinformation and lies.

Vance clutched his pearls that the Romanian government just nullified an election because it was proven that there was a deep Russian disinformation campaign to propel a far-right party into power.

Besides the fact that Vance hypocritically works for Trump who attempted "coup" to overturn a fair election, Vance wants the world to ignore the fact that any political candidate who is elected into power based on lies and disinformation is in fact NOT a representative of the will of the people because they were elected fraudulently (i.e., if they had told the truth, they might not have been elected).

Consider Trump. If he had not lied and distanced himself from the deeply unpopular Project 2025, but had instead said he planned on using it as a blueprint for his second term, how many of those swing state voters would have actually voted for him?

Therefore, Trump has NO mandate that reflects the "will of the people" not only because he was NOT elected by a majority of the voters (just a plurality) but because he lied about his true intentions for a second administration during his campaign.

[See more about how Vance hypocritically turns "free speech" on its head below the cut.]

Vance turns "free speech" on its head.

Vance took hypocrisy to a new level in his Munich remarks, when he talked about "free speech":

Just as the Biden administration seemed desperate to silence people for speaking their minds, so the Trump administration will do precisely the opposite, and I hope that we can work together on that. [...] You cannot win a democratic mandate by censoring your opponents or putting them in jail, whether that’s the leader of the opposition, a humble Christian praying in her own home, or a journalist trying to report the news. [emphasis added]

Well, what Vance said is laughable given that Trump, Musk & their cronies have been fully behind censorship of not only speech, but of ideas, which they have demonstrated by:

Purging federal departments of anything related to DEI, including any "words" such as "gender" or "diversity," and any personnel who have promoted those ideas, or who have even attended one diversity training years ago.

Threatening to prosecute private businesses that promote DEI or provide diversity training to their employees.

Purging the study of or mention of "climate change" from government websites.

Withholding government funds for public schools and even universities that teach subjects related to racism, sexism, and gender studies and (in the case of K-12 schools) who choose NOT to teach a whitewashed "patriotic history."

Threatening to go after the mainstream press if they criticize Trump or his policies too much. (Already he has cut access to the White House for the AP's refusal to call the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, and has kicked important news media like The New York Times from their offices in the Pentagon, replacing them instead with right-wing media outlets.

Threatening to use the DOJ to go after the "enemy within" (i.e., politicians who do not support what Trump is doing, regardless of political party).

And lets not forget Trump's purge of civil servants who have different political views, and who will not pledge loyalty to Trump over the Constitution.

Through all of the above, Trump, Vance, and other MAGA GOP have shown us that they have no problems stepping all over the freedom of speech/of the press protections of the First Amendment over and over again.

I could go on and on about the hypocrisy of that speech, but the bottom line is that JD Vance embarrassed our nation by what he said in Munich. He also presented the Trump administration as being firmly on the side of the far-right/neofascist political parties in Europe.

At this point, many europeans must see very little difference between the US under Trump and Russia under Putin.

How far we have fallen as a nation in less than one month.

_______________ Image sources (before edits/captions): WWII meme photo source; "Inch" gif video source; "No mandate" photo source; "Freedom of speech" image source.

[record-guy59]

Occupy Democrats 

BREAKING: Wildly popular punk band The Dropkick Murphys interrupts their own concert to challenge a MAGA fan in the crowd to a hilarious wager — and ends up humiliating Donald Trump in the process.

This is the best viral moment we've seen in ages...

"The reason we speak out, we don't care if we lose fans, because when history is said and done we want it known that Dropkick Murphys stood with the people, we stood with the worker, okay?" said the band's frontman Ken Casey.

"And it's all a f*cking scam guys. I want to propose in the name of decency and fairness, sir, I'd like to propose a friendly wager, you can't lose this wager," Casey said to a man in the audience wearing MAGA gear.

"Would you — in the name of dialogue and discourse and I appreciate you being here — would you agree to a friendly wager? He says 'sure' that's a good sport!" said Casey.

"Well, first of all do you support American workers?" asked Casey.

The man claimed that he did.

"Of course you do, of course you do," replied Casey.

"So and you support American businesses obviously?" asked Casey. "So, I don't know if you guys know about it because we don't go around f*cking bragging about it but Dropkick Murphys always sells proudly made in American merchandise only."

Casey then held up a Dropkick Murphys shirt that had been made in America.

"And here's the bet I'd like to make," continued Casey. "If you lose the bet, we switch shirts, okay? If you win the bet I give you $100 and the shirts. Right? That's why I said you can't lose right?"

"All right Matt can we get a little drumroll please," Casey said to drummer Matt Kelly. Kelly complied.

"This is f*cking high drama here," said Casey. "American made. Sir, could you both turn backwards please. Don't worry, no one's gonna— He just needs to check your tags on your shirt and your hat. Just need to see where they're made."

"No, no, no the MAGA shirt, let's see where that's made!" said Casey.

A member of the band's crew then checked the man's MAGA merchandise and discovered that it was made in Nicaragua.

"It's made in Nicaragua! Ohhhhhh!" Casey shouted triumphantly as the crowd roared. "Oh he is a good sport he's taking the shirt off! We're taking crime off the streets!"

"God bless your f*cking heart," added Casey, tossing the man a band t-shirt. "That's a good sport You get one proudly made in America Dropkick Murphys shirt."

This isn't the first time that the Dropkick Murphys have gone after Donald Trump and his fraudulent movement. At a show in 2022, Casey ripped into the MAGA cult leader—

"If you were part of a union or working-class people who were allowed to build a better life in the middle-class in America, you f*cking listen to us! Cause if you're out there buying those f*cking hats that these swindlers are selling at that f*cking fair — I'm sorry, kids, I know there's kids here — then you're part of the problem, and I'll tell you why," he said.

"Because you're being duped by the greatest swindler in the history of the world," he continued. "You're being duped by a bunch of grifters and billionaires who don't give a sh*t about you or your family! They care about their f*cking tax breaks and the money they can put in their pocket!"

"If you consider yourself a patriot and you're spouting off that election denying sh*t, I will fight your ass outside if you want to," he went on. "Wake the f*ck up! We’re working class people! These people are the f*cking rich, the billionaires and they don’t give a s*it!"

It really is that simple. Despite his claims to care about the forgotten working man, Donald Trump has only ever cared about himself and his rich buddies. Every single one of his policies is designed to help them at the expense of the rest of us.

Please like and share!

Follow Occupy Democrats for more.

[ivankahasbeentreatedsounfairly]

By M. Gessen

For those bewildered by why so many Americans apparently voted against the values of liberal democracy, Balint Magyar has a useful formulation. “Liberal democracy,” he says, “offers moral constraints without problem-solving” — a lot of rules, not a lot of change — while “populism offers problem-solving without moral constraints.” Magyar, a scholar of autocracy, isn’t interested in calling Donald Trump a fascist. He sees the president-elect’s appeal in terms of something more primal: “Trump promises that you don’t have to think about other people.”

Around the world, populist autocrats have leveraged the thrilling power of that promise to transform their countries into vehicles for their own singular will. Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orban vowed to restore a simpler, more orderly past, in which men were men and in charge. What they delivered was permission to abandon societal inhibitions, to amplify the grievances of one’s own group and heap hate on assorted others, particularly on groups that cannot speak up for themselves. Magyar calls this “morally unconstrained collective egoism.”

Trump’s first term, and his actions in the four years since, tracked the early record of Putin and Orban in important ways. Looking closely at their trajectories, through the lens of Magyar’s theories, gives a chillingly clear sense of where Trump’s second term may lead.

I called Magyar to ask about this pattern in the late winter of 2021, when it became clear to me that Trump would run for re-election. Magyar is Hungarian, and has extensively studied the autocracy of Orban. Like Trump, Orban had been cast out of office (in 2002, in a vote his supporters said had been fraudulent); he didn’t regain power until eight years later. In the interim, he consolidated his movement, positioning himself and his party as the only true representatives of the Hungarian people. It followed that the sitting government was illegitimate and that anyone who supported it was not part of the nation. When Orban was re-elected, he carried out what Magyar calls an “autocratic breakthrough,” changing laws and practices so that he could not be dislodged again. It helped that he had a supermajority in parliament. Trump, similarly, spent four years attacking the Biden administration, and the vote that brought it to the White House, as fraudulent, and positioning himself as the only true voice of the people. He is also returning with a power trifecta — the presidency and both houses of Congress. He too can quickly reshape American government in his image.

Trump and his supporters have shown tremendous hostility to civic institutions — the judiciary, the media, universities, many nonprofits, some religious groups — that seek to define and enforce our obligations to one another. Autocrats such as Orban and Putin reject that deliberative process, claiming for themselves the exclusive right to define those obligations. If those two leaders, and Trump’s own first term, are any indication, he will likely begin by getting rid of experts, regulators and other civil servants he sees as superfluous, eliminating jobs that he thinks simply shouldn’t exist. Expect asylum officers to be high on that list.

A major target outside of government will be universities. In Hungary, the Central European University, a pioneering research and educational institution (and Magyar’s academic home), was forced into exile. To understand what can happen to public universities in the United States, look at Florida, where the administration of Gov. Ron DeSantis has effectively turned the state university system into a highly policed arm of his government. The MAGA movement’s attack on private universities has been underway for some time; most recently it drove the congressional hearings on antisemitism, in the wake of which half a dozen college presidents no longer have their jobs. Watch for moves to strip private universities of federal funding and tax breaks. Under this kind of financial pressure, even the largest and wealthiest universities will cut jobs and shutter departments; smaller liberal arts colleges will go out of business.

Civil society groups — especially those that serve or advocate for immigrants, formerly incarcerated people, L.G.B.T.Q. people, women and vulnerable groups — will be attacked. Then they may come for the unions.

In an Opinion article��in The Washington Post, the publisher of The Times, A.G. Sulzberger, laid out some probable scenarios for a Trump administration’s war on the media. I would add that, like Orban — and like the first Trump administration — this president will reward loyal media with privileged access and will attack critical media by targeting its owners’ other businesses. That is a particularly effective tactic, one that we may have seen at work even before Trump was re-elected, when the billionaire owners of The Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post decided to nix their publications’ presidential endorsements. (Explaining their decision, the owners cited reasons not related to deference to Trump.)

--

Kamala Harris’s campaign, of course, tried to warn Americans about this and a lot more, labeling Trump a fascist. But Magyar describes fascist movements as “ideology-driven” in a way Trump is not. Take, for comparison, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the former prime minister of Poland, who pursued severe abortion restrictions even when polls showed that those policies could cost him his office. Trump, on the other hand, campaigned against abortion rights when it suited his ends and then positioned himself as a champion of reproductive rights when the context shifted.

I was not convinced by this distinction. To use George Orwell’s formulation, a politician’s face grows to fit his ideological mask. There is perhaps no better example of this than Vladimir Putin, once a cynic with no political convictions, who is now waging a costly, disastrous war in the name of an ideology (incoherent though it may be) of his own invention. And it’s only in hindsight that the European fascists of the 20th century appear to have been driven by coherent ideology: Many of their contemporaries described their beliefs as a hodgepodge. The Yale philosopher Jason Stanley, author of the book “How Fascism Works,” has argued that fascists are defined less by political beliefs than by the way they do politics: by trafficking in fear and hatred of the “other,” by affirming the supremacy of “us” over “them.” All of which describes Trump, doesn’t it?

I made that case to Magyar, unsuccessfully. Look at the Trump family’s appetite for profiting from his political office, he said. That’s not something fascists are known for. The Nazis, for example — “when they took away property from the Jews, they didn’t put it in their own pockets,” he said. “They put it in the state budget.” Orban, on the other hand, is understood to be extraordinarily wealthy; Putin is rumored to be the richest man in Russia. To become the wealthiest man in America, Trump would have to amass more capital than Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos, which seems all but impossible. Putin solved this exact problem by extorting his wealthy allies and robbing his rich enemies.

--

Orban used the fear and hatred of immigrants to declare a state of emergency when refugees from the Middle East started coming to Europe in 2015. (He later used the Covid-19 pandemic and then the Russia-Ukraine war as pretexts to adopt emergency powers.) Trump, during his first term, similarly declared a national emergency in connection with the arrival of asylum seekers at the southern border of the United States. President Biden lifted this national emergency in 2021. But the United States has been under a permanent national emergency since Sept. 14, 2001, when President George W. Bush declared it in response to the 9/11 attacks. Every subsequent president, including Barack Obama and Joe Biden, has renewed this national emergency on an annual basis. That is only one of dozens of national emergencies currently in effect, most of them having lasted years.

In Orban’s case, emergency powers have given him expanded control over the armed forces, including the option of deploying the military domestically. In the United States, the president, under certain circumstances, already has this power. But a state of emergency offers an additional slew of “extraordinary powers.” These include the ability to redirect federal funds, as Trump did to finance the construction of the border wall. And the arsenal of power extends to curtailing electronic communications and — perhaps of particular interest to Trump — ways of exerting pressure on private business. Orban has used similar provisions of Hungarian law to exercise “state supervision” over private companies. In Hungary, Orban is the state.

--

Magyar describes autocratic breakthrough as the transition from the rule of law to the law of rule. When Putin campaigned for president in 2000, his slogan was “Dictatorship of the Law.” I remember a banner with that phrase decorating a polling station in besieged Chechnya. He proceeded to rule by decree, as Orban does now and as Trump did in his first term — and has said he intends to do in his second.

Reading Magyar’s writing about that period, I was struck most of all by the mood that seemed to accompany Orban’s actions. We all remember it from Trump’s first term, this sense of everything happening all at once and the utter impossibility of focusing on the existentially threatening, or distinguishing it from the trivial — if that distinction even exists. It’s not just what the autocrats do to stage their breakthrough, it’s how they do it: passing legislation (or signing executive orders) fast, without any discussion, sometimes late at night, in batches, all the while denigrating and delegitimizing any opposition.

As to the specifics, we know less than we may think we know. Had Trump been elected to a second term in 2020, Magyar says he would have expected him to try to repeal the 22nd Amendment, which established a two-term limit for presidents. I think he may still try to do it, clearing the way to run again at the age of 82. Much has been written about Project 2025 as a sort of legislative blueprint for the second Trump presidency. The historian Rick Perlstein, in a series of articles in The American Prospect, has argued that some of this coverage is misleading. Project 2025 is a vast, complicated document full of contradictory recommendations apparently made by people with different beliefs and agendas. Consistent with Magyar’s theory of autocracy, the document is more a reflection of the clan of people who empower Trump and are empowered by him than an ideological document. It is not a blueprint for coherent legislative change, but it is a blueprint still: a blueprint for trampling the system of government as it is currently constituted, a blueprint of destruction.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/15/opinion/donald-trump-orban-putin.html

[veale2006-blog]

They Tried to STEAL 2024 Like They Did in 2020: Mail-In Fraud, Ballot Rigging, NGO Infiltration, Bureaucratic Sabotage—But Trump’s MAGA Army DESTROYED the Globalist Machine!

The truth is out, and the Deep State’s house of cards is collapsing. The same shadow network that orchestrated the 2020 coup against Donald Trump tried to repeat their success in 2024 but failed spectacularly.

Their schemes, from election manipulation to staged unrest, were exposed, and despite their vast resources, Trump emerged victorious. The American people delivered a resounding blow to the elites’ plans, but their efforts reveal a chilling truth: the lengths they’ll go to maintain control.

A Reminder of 2020’s Election Sabotage

The fraudulent election wasn’t just about mail-in ballots—it was a multi-pronged attack on democracy itself. A coalition of shadow organizations plotted everything, from voter manipulation to the January 6 Capitol breach. They weren’t just trying to defeat Trump; they aimed to frame his supporters as enemies of the state.

In 2024, the Deep State pulled out all the stops, thinking they could repeat their 2020 success. But this time, their schemes unraveled.

Their desperation was evident as they employed even more extreme tactics, including:

Mail-In Ballots and Ballot Harvesting 2.0 Swing states were flooded with mail-in ballots, but patriots were watching. Investigations uncovered ballot trafficking on an industrial scale, with operatives coordinating efforts to manipulate results in key districts.

Corruption at the Polling Places Infiltrators were sent to polling stations in battleground states to delay counts and reject valid votes. But whistleblowers exposed their tactics, preventing a repeat of 2020’s debacle.

High-Tech Censorship and Surveillance Big Tech amplified disinformation, silencing Trump supporters and tracking them to neutralize their influence.

Foreign Influence and NGO Operations Foreign governments and international financiers fueled anti-Trump operations, trying to sabotage his campaign through NGOs and globalist propaganda.

A New January 6 Trap The Deep State tried to engineer another January 6-style event by embedding agitators at Trump rallies, but the MAGA movement, now wise to their tactics, exposed them before they could act.

Why Their Plan Failed

Despite their resources, the Deep State underestimated the resolve of the American people. Whistleblowers revealed the same fraud and manipulation tactics used in 2020, providing irrefutable evidence. Poll watchers, citizen journalists, and grassroots organizations worked tirelessly to ensure transparency.

Trump’s legal team countered their tactics with surgical precision, ensuring their attempts to manipulate the vote were quickly neutralized.

The Fallout

The Deep State’s failure in 2024 has exposed their network. Investigations are underway to uncover the full extent of their operations, and key players within federal agencies, NGOs, and activist groups are being held accountable.

What’s Next?

The Deep State may have failed to steal 2024, but they aren’t finished. Their infrastructure remains intact, and they’ll regroup to sabotage Trump’s administration. Leftist groups are already mobilizing for civil unrest, while the media and Big Tech work to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.

The fight isn’t over—it’s just beginning. Patriots must stay vigilant to ensure the Deep State never succeeds again.

The Deep State tried to steal the 2024 election, but this time, they failed. The republic depends on us

[lifeforcontritio]

The Trump Immunity Decision?

The Supreme Court (excuse me, the six Conservative Justices) agreed their was a broad criminal immunity for presidents when they were engaging in an "official act." Generally this means if the President is acting with the power granted to him by thr Constitution, that he/she is not able to be prosecuted

The specifc example that the Court (excuse me, Six Conservative Justices) found was when Donald Trump directed his Attorney General to send letters to states fraudulently claiming there was voter fraud when the administration had found none, in hopes of convincing states to overturn their elections. The Court said this was protected by the Presidential Immunity

The Dissent poses some very reasonable questions to the Majority about the scope of this Immunity. Namely, they ask a question that they asked during Oral Arguments. If the President is the commander and chief of the United States Military, and the President can and will sign off or order drone strikes and assassinations on particular figures, would this not be an "Official Act" of the executive? What prevents a President from ordering his military to assassinate or detain a political rival? Shouldnt there be penalties for a President doing something like that?

The Majority offers no answer to this question. They explain that a President enjoys absolute, or at least presumptive immunity for all Official Acts. Official Acts are anything "not manifestly or palpably beyond his authority." No guardrails. No accountability.

Gee, I wonder why people might be concerned about Trump, the cultish figurehead of the MAGA movement who is now asking for loyalty pledges for consideration in his administration, abusing this insane Supreme Court decision.

If you are following Project 2025

They currently are attempting to re-brand it as Agenda 47

[foreverlogical]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, far-right MAGA conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers angrily railed against vaccines — falsely claiming, with zero evidence, that they were dangerous. President Joe Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci, his top White House medical adviser, pushed back against their claims and assured Americans that the COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna, Pfizer and others were perfectly safe.

Even former President Donald Trump himself encouraged vaccination, maintaining his opposition to vaccine mandates. Some conspiracy theorists, including Infowars' Alex Jones, saw Trump's pro-vaccine stand as a betrayal.

Anti-vaxxers and medical conspiracy theorists are still plentiful in MAGA World. And according to Mother Jones' Kiera Butler, they are making their presence felt among autism groups and falsely claiming that vaccines are a cause of autism.

READ MORE: How a urine-drinking QAnon anti-vaxxer missed his chance to 'confront Trump': report

"For a quarter of a century," Butler explains in an article published by Mother Jones on April 13, "proponents of unproven autism treatments have overlapped with anti-vaccine activists. The vaccine skepticism movement took off after British physician Andrew Wakefield published a study in 1998 suggesting that routine childhood vaccinations caused autism. That study was later found to be fraudulent, the paper retracted, and Wakefield barred from practicing medicine in the United Kingdom."

Butler continues, "Nonetheless, the myth of vaccines causing autism persisted and has been amplified by organizations like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s Children's Health Defense and celebrities including Jenny McCarthy, and Oprah Winfrey. Even the largest and most powerful autism advocacy organization, Autism Speaks, which was founded in 2005 and today runs a $50 million budget, did not officially distance itself from vaccine skepticism until 2015. Over the last few decades, many groups and individuals who spread falsehoods about vaccines as the cause of autism began to promote unproven and sometimes dangerous treatments for it — special diets, supplements, cleanses, and pricey medical spa experiences."

RFK, Jr.'s Children's Health Defense (CHD) should not be confused with the Children's Defense Fund (CDF), which is in no way affiliated with RFK, Jr.'s organization. Children's Health Defense and the Children's Defense Fund are totally separate groups with different views.

Butler notes, "This world of dubious autism treatments used to be mostly limited to private social media groups and conferences. Indeed, beginning about a decade ago, the very notion of autism as a disorder began to lose currency among many autistic people and scientists who study autism: They started to view the condition not as an affliction, but rather as an innate brain difference. Autistic people experience the world differently, and that difference, they say, is something to be honored rather than treated."

READ MORE: How 'right-wing anti-vaxxer' conspiracy theorists have targeted East Palestine residents: report

Read Mother Jones’ full report at this link.

VISIT WEBSITE

[mojave-pete]

Biden Is Running a Protection Racket

October 28, 2020

By Sidney Powell

 Joe Biden's big pitch is his promise to restore calm.  It's a con.  It's Antifa and Black Lives Matter — both on his side — that are stirring everything up.  He's trying to run a protection racket: vote Democrat, or the chaos continues.

Biden talks of calm, but it is not Trump-supporters storming restaurants and other public places across the country to demand obeisance to their agenda.  Instead, from Washington to Kentucky to Florida, it is the "Black Lives Matter" movement — which Biden has made a centerpiece of his campaign — that has smashed up restaurants, threatened their owners, and demanded that diners raise the black power fist.  As one headline put it, "aggressive mob of white BLM protesters threaten and film white diners at DC restaurants and DEMAND they raise their fist and show solidarity with them...or else."

Biden speaks of tolerance, but it isn't MAGA people marching into our schools, newsrooms, and even corporate boardrooms to demand absolute allegiance; it's Biden-supporting leftists.  As President Trump warned in his Independence Day address at Mt. Rushmore, if you do not "perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow its commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted, and punished."

Biden professes not to treat the other party as the enemy, but he demonizes his opponents whenever he opens his mouth.  Just this week, he called Trump-supporters "chumps."  And his supporters call themselves "the resistance" — a term ordinarily used to describe armed insurgency against an occupying military power.

Biden speaks of mutual respect, but he demonstrates contempt, animosity, and rage at Trump-supporters.  Let's face it: no one in America is afraid of going out in public while wearing a Biden hat.

Biden accuses the president of sowing chaos, but small businesses across the country haven't boarded up their windows in advance of MAGA rallies.

Biden decries deepening divisions but defends government-wide indoctrination sessions that preach tribalism and racism rather than unity and colorblindness.  In the first debate, with the assistance of moderator Chris Wallace, Biden dismissed the spread of "Critical Race Theory" as "racial sensitivity training."

Critical Race Theory is an explicitly Marxist academic concept that casts all white people as oppressors.  It maintains that white Americans must stop valuing "white" things like "individualism" and "objectivity" and give up their "comfort," "relationships with some other white people," and even their "physical safety" to atone for their "complicity in the system of white supremacy."

A recent Wall Street Journal column called it "a deeply ideological agenda that includes reducing people to a racial essence, segregating them, and judging them by their group identity rather than individual character, behavior and merit."  Joe Biden just calls that "sensitivity."

There's nothing new about the bad faith behind the Democratic appeal to "civility."  What it really means is: no dissent from its views.  Just submit.

It started even before President Trump's inauguration.  When Vice President–Elect Mike Pence and his wife went to see Hamilton on Broadway two weeks after his election victory, the cast berated him from the stage, haranguing the New York City audience to boo him.  A Democrat restaurateur in Virginia kicked White House press secretary Sarah Sanders out.  Crowds yelled "shame" at Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen as she tried to eat dinner at a Mexican restaurant in Washington.

Democrat elected officials cheered the thuggishness on from the very beginning.  Rep. Maxine Waters, in a typical display of civility, said that if you see Trump Cabinet members "in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd ... [a]nd you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere."

If Joe Biden is really all about a return to civility, why is his national campaign co-chair Cedric Richmond, a top-ranking Democrat who defended Waters's shocking call for public harassment, disturbance of the peace, bullying, and shaming?

The truth is, Biden has gone all in on division and hatred from the moment he launched his campaign with complete lies about the president's remarks on the violence in Charlottesville in 2017 — remarks that included the words "I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally."

As it turns out, the president's prediction at that juncture — that if you pulled down Robert E. Lee's statues, they would come for Washington and Jefferson next — proved entirely correct.  The violence that day in Charlottesville would eventually pale in comparison to the violence accompanying leftists' attempts to take over our cities and pull down our monuments — while Biden and Democrat mayors and public officials joined in marches or watched their cities burn.

The fraudulent Biden campaign has no policies, no proposals, no plans to do anything but divide America to facilitate the return of Biden and the Democrats to power to enrich their friends and themselves at the expense of "we the people."  Unified patriots are their greatest fear.

Don't be fooled by Biden's sanctimonious rhetoric.  He is not the Fire Department.  He is the arsonist lobbing Molotov cocktails.

[blackpilledkremlintsarina5294]

And Trump wants to invigorate AIPAC because of his undying devotion to Israel. That's the guy who told you that he was going to fight the deep state. AIPAC is a lobby in the United States. What Trump claims to be against is what he is himself. MAGA is as fraudulent of a movement as the Black Lives Matter movement.

[veale2006-blog]

They Tried to STEAL 2024 Like They Did in 2020: Mail-In Fraud, Ballot Rigging, NGO Infiltration, Bureaucratic Sabotage—But Trump’s MAGA Army DESTROYED the Globalist Machine!

The truth is out, and the Deep State’s house of cards is collapsing. The same shadow network that orchestrated the 2020 coup against Donald Trump tried to repeat their success in 2024 but failed spectacularly.

Their schemes, from election manipulation to staged unrest, were exposed, and despite their vast resources, Trump emerged victorious. The American people delivered a resounding blow to the elites’ plans, but their efforts reveal a chilling truth: the lengths they’ll go to maintain control.

A Reminder of 2020’s Election Sabotage

The fraudulent election wasn’t just about mail-in ballots—it was a multi-pronged attack on democracy itself. A coalition of shadow organizations plotted everything, from voter manipulation to the January 6 Capitol breach. They weren’t just trying to defeat Trump; they aimed to frame his supporters as enemies of the state.

In 2024, the Deep State pulled out all the stops, thinking they could repeat their 2020 success. But this time, their schemes unraveled.

Their desperation was evident as they employed even more extreme tactics, including:

Mail-In Ballots and Ballot Harvesting 2.0 Swing states were flooded with mail-in ballots, but patriots were watching. Investigations uncovered ballot trafficking on an industrial scale, with operatives coordinating efforts to manipulate results in key districts.

Corruption at the Polling Places Infiltrators were sent to polling stations in battleground states to delay counts and reject valid votes. But whistleblowers exposed their tactics, preventing a repeat of 2020’s debacle.

High-Tech Censorship and Surveillance Big Tech amplified disinformation, silencing Trump supporters and tracking them to neutralize their influence.

Foreign Influence and NGO Operations Foreign governments and international financiers fueled anti-Trump operations, trying to sabotage his campaign through NGOs and globalist propaganda.

A New January 6 Trap The Deep State tried to engineer another January 6-style event by embedding agitators at Trump rallies, but the MAGA movement, now wise to their tactics, exposed them before they could act.

Why Their Plan Failed

Despite their resources, the Deep State underestimated the resolve of the American people. Whistleblowers revealed the same fraud and manipulation tactics used in 2020, providing irrefutable evidence. Poll watchers, citizen journalists, and grassroots organizations worked tirelessly to ensure transparency.

Trump’s legal team countered their tactics with surgical precision, ensuring their attempts to manipulate the vote were quickly neutralized.

The Fallout

The Deep State’s failure in 2024 has exposed their network. Investigations are underway to uncover the full extent of their operations, and key players within federal agencies, NGOs, and activist groups are being held accountable.

What’s Next?

The Deep State may have failed to steal 2024, but they aren’t finished. Their infrastructure remains intact, and they’ll regroup to sabotage Trump’s administration. Leftist groups are already mobilizing for civil unrest, while the media and Big Tech work to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.

The fight isn’t over—it’s just beginning. Patriots must stay vigilant to ensure the Deep State never succeeds again.

The Deep State tried to steal the 2024 election, but this time, they failed. The republic depends on us.

[go-redgirl]

Candace Owens at Blexit: ‘We will Win, Because We Have the Truth and God on Our Side’

Candace Owens and others delivered remarks at the third Blexit — or black exit from the Democrat Party —event on Sunday in Dallas, Texas, where hundreds of people gathered to hear from the conservative speakers.

Hundreds of event attendees wearing MAGA hats and Blexit t-shirts gathered in Dallas, Texas, on the eve of Owens’ birthday to spend the afternoon with the conservative pundit, who first announced Blexit last October as “the black exit from the Democrat Party,” vowing to take her mission of her mission of exodus to cities controlled by Democrat politicians.

The event began with Owens’ Blexit video displaying the mainstream media’s negative portrayal of the black community before displaying Owens’ positive portrayal. “What makes me so sad about the way that I see the media portraying black people,” said Owens, “they made us more pathetic — when I grew up, the black community was loving, there was laughter; family; church; God.”

“I remember black people being strong,” continued Owens, “The pillars of society — my grandfather was such a good man, he has such good morals, and he was a strong man — and now we’re seeing a society that wants to weaken the black man, they want to weaken the church, there’s blatant anti-Christianity bias happening in our media.”

“For me, I wanted Blexit to be a return to — a return to values, to restore the values in the black community, to make us realize that our enemy is not the white man, our enemy is the mainstream media that is convincing us that we are only victims.”

Owens continued by mentioning a second Democrat presidential candidate, Joe Biden, who kicked off his 2020 campaign by promoting the “very fine people” Charlottesville hoax.

“Reminder, Joe Biden, your mentor, best friend, and political ally was Robert Byrd, a literal Klansman,” said Owens, “No thank you, Joe Biden, no thank you. Who else in the clown show on the Left do we have as candidates?”

“Kamala,” answered Tatum, “Do y��all remember when she said, ‘Back in college, I was smoking marijuana and listening to Tupac’? — Tupac didn’t even have an album out when she was in college. Total fraudulence.”

“She could have said, ‘Hey black community, I’m going to talk to you about your issues — I’m going to talk about the plague of gun violence, black on black crime,'” added Owens, “What did she do? She offered marijuana. I mean, really think about what that says. It’s an insult. They don’t even want to have a conversation with us.”

“Who’s another candidate that they have on the Left?” continued Owens, “Bernie Sanders — he’s a pretty wealthy guy, right? He wants us to live the way he won’t live, he flies private everywhere, he advocates for socialism. Well, socialism has already been tried in this country — they tried that via the welfare system in the black community.”

“Do you want to know what that did? That removed the fathers from the home,” said Owens, “In the 1960’s, the single-motherhood rate in the black community was 23 percent, today it is 77 percent, because they used their welfare policies to incentivize father absence — because if you break down the family, everything else falls apart.”

The Blexit event went on for the rest of the afternoon, featuring a lineup of guest speakers, and ending with a video montage of friends and fans wishing Owens a happy birthday.

“It’s been a fight,” said Owens, “but it’s a fight that I feel God has given me the strength and the position to go forth into the fire — we will fight and we will win, because we have the truth.”

“We have God on our side,” added Owens, “and while the Left is being tethered down by hate and envy and greed, we are being brought together with this movement of patriotism, a love for our country, and a love for God.”

This had been Owens’ third Blexit event of 2019, the first having been held in Los Angeles, California, in January, with the second event hosted in governor Ralph Northam’s home state of Virginia last month. The fourth event is expected to be held in Washington, D.C.

You can follow Alana Mastrangelo on Twitter at @ARmastrangelo and on Instagram.

READ MORE STORIES ABOUT:

2020 Election Politics Tech Blexit Candace Owens TP USA