#litigation business law

[litigationattorneydallas]

Trusted Business Litigation Attorneys in Texas: Strategic Counsel and Personalized Service

We are trusted business litigation attorneys in Texas provides strategic counsel and personalized service to clients facing complex legal disputes. With extensive experience and a deep understanding of the intricacies of business law. We are committed to protecting our clients' interests and achieving favorable outcomes. Whether you're dealing with contract disputes, fraud allegations, or other legal challenges, we are dedicated to helping you navigate the legal system with confidence and achieve your goals.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

A business model for bankrupting the oil companies

Today (June 6), I’m on a Rightscon panel about interoperability.

Tomorrow (June 7), I’m keynoting the Re:publica conference in Berlin.

Thursday (June 8) at 8PM, I’m at Otherland Books in Berlin with my novel Red Team Blues.

When a giant company wrecks your life, what are you gonna do? They can afford more and better lawyers than you can, and they have people whose full time job is fighting off lawsuits — are you really gonna beat those people by pursuing your grievance as a side-hustle? Do you really wanna be a full-time, professional litigant?

For some people, the answer is yes: some people are angry enough, or sufficiently morally offended, to make suing a giant company their life’s mission. Sometimes, they succeed, and force companies to cough up gigantic sums of money. Obviously, this makes the plaintiff better off, but it can also make things better for the rest of us. Money talks and bullshit walks, and once it becomes clear that 300% of the profits from harming people will be sucked out of the company by a lawsuit, shareholders will revolt and force the company to clean up its act.

Shareholders don’t invest in companies that ruin our lives because they are committed to an ideology of cruelty. Ideology only gets you so far: the pursuit of profit incentivizes far worse conduct than mere sadism ever can:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/06/02/plunderers/#farbenizers

Incentives matter. Companies above a certain size become too big to fail and too big to jail. They capture their regulators and ensure that any damages the government extracts are less than their profits — a fine is a price.

Juries, on the other hand, can and do really whack a company for its bad conduct. They understand that incentives matter. They understand that a company that saves $1,000,001 by cutting back on workplace safety can’t be driven to improve its behavior by a fine of $1,000,000 after it kills a bunch of workers. If profit outstrips penalties, penalties aren’t effective.

A dirty $1m profit needs to be met with a $100m judgment. As the Untouchables MBA teaches us, this is just sound business: “They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPZ6eaL3S2E

But suing these giant companies is hard. They can tie you up in court for years — decades, even. They can outspend and outwait you. The more profits a company has racked up through its evil deeds, the more claims it can fend off. Incentives matter, so if you’re gonna commit corporate murder, you’d better do a lot of it to build up the cash needed to scare off your victims and their survivors.

However: the bigger a company is, the more cash it has, the more money there is to extract from it if you can prevail in court. If the company has genuinely injured you, and if you can mobilize the capital and resources to pursue it to final judgment, there’s a huge payoff at the end of the process — and a lesson for all the other companies contemplating their own course of action.

That’s the Voltaire MBA: “you have to execute an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others.”

For hundreds of years, rich, powerful people have observed their colleagues’ abuses and thought, “They only pull that shit on peasants — but if they did it to me, I could sue them for everything!”

This led to an obvious course of action: strike a bargain with the mutilated, ruined peasants to finance their suit against the toff that so abused them, in exchange for a (large) share of the proceeds. Medieval courts called this champerty; today, we call it litigation finance: investing in other peoples’ grievances against deep-pocketed monsters, in the expectation of reaping huge cash payouts.

On paper, litigation finance seems like a neat solution to a messy problem. The bigger a company is, the worse the abuses it commits — and the more it can be made to pay for its sins. The normal economics of litigation are turned upside-down: rather than avoiding the largest companies, you pursue them. This is the Willie Sutton MBA: “That’s where the money is.”

Litigation finance is a large and growing chunk of the finance sector. For about a decade, hedge funds and private equity have been bankrolling law-firms that represent people who’ve been mangled by corporations, keeping the money flowing through whatever delays and entanglements the target throws up:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/magazine/should-you-be-allowed-to-invest-in-a-lawsuit.html?smid=tw-share

Litigation finance can be thought of as the no-win/no-fee “ambulance chaser” business on steroids. While a local lawyer can make a tidy living going after slip-and-falls and fender-benders, splitting the proceeds with their clients, a firm backed by a huge investment fund can do the same to companies with billions in the bank and hundreds of millions on the line.

Litigation finance is also closely related to impact litigation, which is when a nonprofit uses charitably raised funds to chase corporations and governments through the courts to establish precedents that overturn bad laws or pave the way for future judgments. Impact litigation can be thought of as the trailblazer for litigation finance: for-profit lawsuits are risk averse and stick to pursuing cases that have a high likelihood of eventually succeeding, while impact litigators are a kind of legal entrepreneur, advancing new, uncertain legal theories in the hopes of making new law. Once that law is created, litigation finance can drum up thousands of similarly situated plaintiffs and sue tons of companies on the same theory, citing the new precedent.

Litigation finance’s first big scores was going after med-tech and pharma companies. A lax regulatory environment allowed medical companies to market deadly products that maimed or killed people wholesale — think Vioxx, vaginal meshes or metal-on-metal hip replacements (a doc about this, The Bleeding Edge, will give you persistent nightmares):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bleeding_Edge

Suing the companies that killed your family or permanently disabled you is a slow and ugly process, but it’s a lot more certain than asking Congress to patch the loopholes the company that hurt you exploited, or hoping that a future President will appoint an agency head who gives a shit, and that the Senate will confirm them. And since money talks and bullshit walks, corporations that can’t pay dividends or do stock buybacks because they owe all their cash to their victims will suffer in the stock market, and their rivals will clean house and tread carefully.

Which brings me to the latest turn in litigation finance: climate litigation. As more and more money has sloshed into ESG funds that are supposed to make money by investing in ethical, climate-friendly businesses, the idea of suing giant oil companies and other wreckers has grown more attractive. 18 months ago, Businessweek covered the nascent-but-growing phenomenon:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/09/grievance-factory/#champerty

That growth has only continued. With more and larger ESG funds chasing returns, there’s a lot more money available to represent, say, poisoned indigenous people in the global south whose ancestral lands have been rendered an uninhabitable hellscape by a mining or petrochemical company. The returns from these cases aren’t correlated with wider economic trends: whether the market is up down, it makes no difference to the size of the judgment or settlement that is extracted in the end.

A new piece in the Financial Times by Camilla Hodgson does an excellent job rounding up the state of play in litigation finance, starting with the oil giant PTTEP paying $102m to 15,000 Indonesian farmers to settle claims stemming from a massive, ocean-killing oil spill in 2019:

https://www.ft.com/content/055ef9f4-5fb7-4746-bebd-7bfa00b20c82

The firm that financed the suit is Harbour Litigation Funding, and they paid for a lot of shoe-leather lawyering, sending reps on off-road motorbikes to each of the farmers’ plots to sign them up. The case cost more than $21m, and Harbour creamed $53.5m off the top of the settlement from PTTEP — about 40% of the total.

Those numbers are pretty compelling investment story: there aren’t a lot of opportunities to make a >100% return on a $21m investment in 15 years — let alone investments that let you claim to be bringing justice to poor farmers who’ve been abused by rapacious corporate murderers.

Other cases are still ongoing: mining giant BHP is facing a £36b class action case over the 2015 collapse of Brazil’s Fundão dam, which released poisoned mine-tailings into waterways serving millions of people. 700,000 plaintiffs are in the class, and the investors, Prisma Capital (Brazil) and North Wall Capital (UK) have already fronted £70m pursuing the case.

There is a vast inventory of cases like these, just lying around, waiting for someone to stake a claim. One barrier is that most of the world’s large law firms are conflicted out of pursuing these cases — they represent these same companies in other actions. But a new sector of specialized, un-conflicted firms is growing up, and tackling more and more of these cases.

These firms are chasing relatively easy claims, but there’s an even bigger fish out there, waiting to be caught: class actions against carbon-intensive companies, especially coal and oil companies, for their knowing contributions to the global climate emergency. These corporations are sitting on hundreds of billions of dollars, and they have inflicted trillions in harms. There’s gold in them thar wildfires.

The FT cites experts who predict a massive wave of litigation finance climate suits in the next 2–3 years, and notes an increasing tempo of shareholder motions demanding that big oil and mining companies disclose their litigation risks in their investor reports. This is a very compelling idea, a kaiju boss-fight in which we recruit monsters to fight other monsters. It’s such a fun idea that I actually wrote a novel about it, 2009’s Makers, in which corporate misconduct that has not yet reached the statute of limitations becomes the new oil, prompting a huge investment bubble:

https://craphound.com/category/makers/

But is the answer to a bad guy with a law firm a good guy with a law firm? There are certainly some ways this can go very wrong (many of which end up in Makers). Back in 2015, Cathy O’Neil published an excellent critique of litigation finance in the context of vaginal mesh cases:

https://mathbabe.org/2015/09/01/litigation-finance-a-terrible-idea/

O’Neill’s point is that incentives matter. The incentive for a litigation finance fund is to extract settlements, not win justice. Time and again, we’ve seen how a financial tactic can be severed from a societal strategy — like how GDP can be goosed to spectacular heights without improving national prosperity.

There’s even a name for this phenomenon: Goodhart’s Law: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” The finance sector is spookily good at decoupling positive societal outcomes from positive investor outcomes. The real answer to medical companies that mutilate women with vaginal meshes, or destroy the planet with CO2, is criminal sanctions and regulation, not private lawsuits.

That said, I think there’s a case for the one leading to the other. Right now, climate wreckers devote very large sums to preventing effective action on climate. Suborning regulators and politicians all over the world isn’t cheap. If we take away the money they’ve saved up for this project through stonking, eye-watering judgments, and if we convince the capital markets not to give them any more money lest it be immediately extracted to pay for more redress of a litany of grievances, then perhaps we can deprive them of the capacity of corrupt our political process.

One way to understand whether something is a genuine threat to a company’s power is to look at how viciously the company attacks it. If you doubt that unions could do good for workers, just take a peep at the all-out violent blitzes that Amazon and Starbucks mount in the face of union drives. I mean, imagine if the Democratic Party took unions half as seriously as the GOP!

The corporate lobby exhibits the same terror over plaintiff-side lawsuits as it does over unions. A massive, decades-long campaign to villify plaintiff-side lawyers has convinced many of us that corporations are the victims of the legal system, rather than its masters. The PR campaign is surprisingly effective, despite its reliance on lies about the “McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit” and other urban legends:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/12/hot-coffee/#mcgeico

Corporate plunderers are terrified of being dragged into court by their victims, and devote titanic amounts of blood and treasure into making it harder and harder to do so. On the “the more scared the are, the better” metric, litigation finance is a slam dunk.

But winning a case isn’t the same as getting a judgment or disciplining a firm. When Steven Donziger won a landmark judgment against Chevron on behalf of indigenous people whose lands and bodies had been permanently poisoned, the company struck back:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/09/02/free-steven-donziger/#free-donziger

Chevron bribed a judge in Ecuador to claim that Donziger had rigged the case, then brought a case in the US against Donziger for racketeering, judge-shopping to get judge Lewis A Kaplan on their case. Kaplan is a former tobacco industry lawyer who never met a corporate criminal he didn’t love, and when the SDNY prosecutor declined to press charges against Donziger because the case was absurd, Kaplan appointed a private lawyer — whose firm also acted for Chevron! — to act as prosecutor. The case against Donziger was obviously trumped up — the Ecuadoran judge who accused him of corruption later recanted and multiple countries’ Supreme Courts upheld the judgment Donziger won against Chevron. Nevertheless, Kaplan got Donziger locked up under house arrest for years, and even got him banged up in Riker’s for a time. Donziger’s lost his law license and his clients are still awaiting judgment.

This is the best law that money can buy, and Chevron has a lot of money. The massive expenditures needed to railroad Donizer were a pittance compared to the $9.5b judgment Chevron owed its victims in Ecuador.

The lesson of Donziger is that these companies won’t go genrly to their graves. They are enormously, unimaginably wealthy and act with the ruthlessness born of greed, which makes mere sadism pale by comparison. Litigation finance is exciting and promising, but it’s only a tactic — and it’s a tactic that’s always in danger of being turned against the goal it nominally serves. The people funding litigation finance don’t want to save the world — they just want to get rich. They can and will change sides if someone can make the business case for doing so.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/06/06/thats-where-the-money-is/#champerty

[Image ID: A mirrored office tower bearing the Exxon logo. One face of the office tower is a graffiti-covered ATM. Before the tower is a giant pile of bricks of oversized US $100 bills in paper wrappers. The ATM screen depicts a smouldering Deep Water Horizon oil platform.]

Image:

Flying Logos (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Over_$1,000,000_dollars_in_USD_$100_bill_stacks.png

CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

 — 

Joe Shlabotnik (modified) https://www.flickr.com/photos/joeshlabotnik/2299501806/

CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

[globallegalassociation]

Global Legal Association, The 4th GLA Patent Conference is a premier gathering designed for key stakeholders in the legal and intellectual property sectors. This year, we are bringing together Business Heads from leading Legal Products and Patent Services Companies, Heads of Legal, Chief Legal Officers (CLOs), and experts in IP litigation, alongside CEOs, Managing Partners, and Senior Partners of prestigious law firms. The conference aims to foster collaboration among legal professionals and business leaders, highlighting the critical intersection of legal strategy and business objectives.

Join us at the 4th GLA Patent Conference to connect with peers, share expertise, and explore the future of patent law and legal services. Together, we can shape the path forward in this dynamic and crucial industry. Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of a transformative dialogue that drives innovation and excellence in the legal arena.

Address- Global Legal Association Suite-427,425 Broadhollow Road, Melville, New York, USA Website: https://www.globallegalassociation.org/ Mail id: events@globallegalassociation.org

[lawbyrhys]

LAW BY RHYS - MY BLOG INTRODUCTION

Hey there! Welcome to Law By Rhys. My name is Rhys, and I am a practicing corporate attorney based in Southern California. While I am largely a trial attorney with specialized interest in the areas of corporate and business law, I have immense interest in many other areas of law as well, and will discuss them here; sharing law humor, hot takes and my opinions on politics, current events and maybe even casually get into some follower-submitted hypothetical cases. All that to say, I love to talk all things law! A quick disclaimer, though; this is not legal advice. I am not your personal attorney. All followers, readers, and viewers of this blog should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. There is no attorney-client relationship between us, and only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein and your interpretation of it is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.

[dweeb-town]

i want to make a small correction to the last person's post: i believe they meant to say shareholders, not stakeholders, in that last sentence. a shareholder is someone who partially owns a company. a stakeholder is someone who is affected by the actions of a company. it's important to distinguish between them because if corporations had a moral obligation to serve stakeholders, that would encompass employees and the public.

traditional share-price-based duties might allow for some stakeholder considerations. telling someone to "generate value" is pretty vague if you don't give a time period-- as an oil company, for instance, you can increase quarter-to-quarter profits, but if your business is reliant on fossil fuels, you are Most Definitely not generating value for shareholders who will be holding onto that stock for a long time, because production of fossil fuels isn't a sustainable business model. if you don't transition to climate-friendly energy production, that will drive your stock price down. so if an oil company announces its refusal to comply with emissions regulations, or to plan to shift to clean energy production, and its share price dips as a result, shouldn't the shareholders be able to sue?

"to whom does a corporation owe duties" is a little bit of an open question, at least academically. some scholars argue that fiduciary duties can take wider societal impacts into account (this is what's sometimes referred to as "stakeholder capitalism." it's about as radical as you can get in corporate law.) of course, this is all majorly hypothetical. in reality, most of these suits are brought when a shareholder notices a stock price drop. people are probably not gonna spend $$ bringing a novel fiduciary duty claim that radically expands traditional corporate purpose unless there are some REALLY good facts on their side.

While I'm writing things that I've been intending to write for a while... one of the things that I think that a lot of people who haven't been involved in like... banking or corporate shenaniganry miss about why our economy is its current flavor of total fuckery is the concept of "fiduciary duty to shareholders."

"Why does every corporation pursue endless growth?" Fiduciary duty to shareholders.

"Why do corporations treat workers the way they do?" Fiduciary duty to shareholders.

"Why do corporations make such bass-ackwards decisions about what's 'good for' the company?" Fiduciary duty to shareholders.

The legal purpose of a corporation with shareholders -- its only true purpose -- is the generation of revenue/returns for shareholders. Period. That's it. Anything else it does is secondary to that. Sustainability of business, treatment of workers, sustainability and quality of product, those things are functionally and legally second to generating revenue for shareholders. Again, period, end of story. There is no other function of a corporation, and all of its extensive legal privileges exist to allow it to do that.

"But Spider," you might say, "that sounds like corporations only exist in current business in order to extract as much money and value as possible from the people actually doing the work and transfer it up to the people who aren't actually doing the work!"

Yes. You are correct. Thank you for coming with me to that realization. You are incredibly smart and also attractive.

You might also say, "but Spider, is this a legal obligation? Could those running a company be held legally responsible for failing their obligations if they prioritize sustainability or quality of product or care of workers above returns for shareholders?"

Yes! They absolutely can! Isn't that terrifying? Also you look great today, you're terribly clever for thinking about these things. The board and officers of a corporation can be held legally responsible to varying degrees for failing to maximize shareholder value.

And that, my friends, is why corporations do things that don't seem to make any fucking sense, and why 'continuous growth' is valued above literally anything else: because it fucking has to be.

If you're thinking that this doesn't sound like a sustainable economic model, you're not alone. People who are much smarter than both of us, and probably nearly as attractive, have written a proposal for how to change corporate law in order to create a more sensible and sustainable economy. This is one of several proposals, and while I don't agree with all of this stuff, I think that reading it will really help people as a springboard to understanding exactly why our economy is as fucked up as it is, and why just saying 'well then don't pursue eternal growth' isn't going to work -- because right now it legally can't. We'd need to change -- and we can change -- the laws around corporate governance.

This concept of 'shareholder primacy' and the fiduciary duty to shareholders is one I had to learn when I was getting my securities licenses, and every time I see people confusedly asking why corporations try to grow grow grow in a way that only makes sense if you're a tumor, I sigh and think, 'yeah, fiduciary duty to shareholders.'

(And this is why Emet and I have refused to seek investors for NK -- we might become beholden to make decisions which maximize investor return, and that would get in the way of being able to fully support our people and our values and say the things we started this company to say.)

Anyway, you should read up on these concepts if you're not familiar. It's pretty eye-opening.

[ladefense]

Post-Merger Issues: Challenges and Solutions

[ladefenselawfirm]

Current Trends in International M&A: A Legal Perspective

In the dynamic landscape of global commerce, Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) remain a critical strategy for companies seeking to enhance competitiveness, innovate, and expand market reach. The international M&A market is witnessing transformative trends shaped by economic conditions, technological advancements, and regulatory developments. This article examines these prevailing trends from a legal standpoint, highlighting their implications for businesses engaged in cross-border transactions.

wwhttps://investtovietnam.com/current-trends-in-international-ma-a-legal-perspective/

[tauruslawcalgaryab]

Taurus Law Calgary | Family, Business, and Litigation Lawyers

Phone: (780) 285-5474

Address: 908 17 Ave SW, Calgary, AB T2T 0A3

Website: https://tauruslaw.ca/

At Taurus Law Calgary, we tackle legal challenges with the precision of hitting a bullseye. Our litigation team is skilled in offering steadfast advocacy and cost-effective solutions for a range of issues, including directors’ liability and shareholder disputes, landlord-tenant and commercial lease disputes, builders’ liens, injunctions, debt collections, new home warranty and insurance disputes, coverage denial, property and real estate disputes, and intellectual property disputes. We also take care of various family law-related cases like uncontested divorce and child support. Whether you're dealing with a difficult dispute or need proactive legal counsel, Taurus Law is dedicated to achieving exceptional results with unwavering precision.

[blacksuitsposts]

BlackSuit Legal Services – Expert Legal Solutions for Finance, Banking, and Corporate Law

In the complex world of finance, banking, and corporate law, finding the right legal partner is crucial. BlackSuit Legal Services stands at the forefront, offering specialized legal assistance for individuals, businesses, financial advisors, and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs). With a team of highly experienced finance lawyers, banking & finance attorneys, and corporate law specialists, BlackSuit ensures that your legal needs are met with precision and professionalism.

Comprehensive Legal Services for Financial Institutions

BlackSuit Legal Services provides a full range of legal solutions tailored to the financial sector. Our expertise extends across various areas of finance and banking law, ensuring that clients receive high-quality representation and advice. Whether you are searching for a banking lawyer near me, need legal consultancy for financial institutions, or require regulatory compliance for NBFCs, we have you covered.

Our services include:

Banking & Finance Lawyers: We specialize in handling cases related to banking law, corporate finance, and lending disputes, offering legal support to both individual clients and financial institutions.

NBFC Legal Services: Our expert lawyers for NBFC ensure regulatory compliance and provide legal guidance for licensing, operations, and disputes involving NBFCs. We help you navigate the complexities of NBFC regulatory compliance and offer legal consultancy for NBFCs and fintech companies.

Corporate Finance Attorneys: From mergers and acquisitions to corporate lending, our corporate finance lawyers provide tailored legal solutions to ensure your business transactions are smooth and compliant with legal standards.

Specialized Services for Financial Advisors and Fintech Companies

BlackSuit Legal Services is a trusted partner for financial advisors and fintech companies. Our lawyers specializing in banking law and attorneys for financial advisors understand the unique challenges faced by professionals in these industries.

Fintech Legal Services: With the rapid growth of financial technology, companies face new regulatory challenges. We offer fintech legal support, covering everything from fintech startup legal advice to fintech compliance lawyers. We ensure your business adheres to all relevant regulations, reducing risk and enhancing operational efficiency.

Legal Support for Financial Advisors: Whether you’re dealing with compliance issues or need a lawyer for NBFC or financial solicitors near me, BlackSuit’s expertise ensures that your legal needs are handled with care and precision.

Resolving Financial Disputes with Top Financial Lawyers

Financial disputes can be complex and damaging to both businesses and individuals. BlackSuit Legal Services provides expert representation for all types of financial conflicts. Our financial dispute lawyers and business finance lawyers have a proven track record of successfully resolving disputes involving banking, finance, and corporate law.

From business contract disputes to company lawsuits, our legal experts provide actionable solutions that protect your interests. Whether you need a corporate litigation lawyer, commercial business lawyer, or a corporate law attorney near me, BlackSuit’s seasoned legal team ensures you receive the best possible representation.

Why Choose BlackSuit Legal Services?

Expertise in Finance Law: Our deep understanding of financial regulations and banking laws ensures your business stays compliant and protected.

Specialized Lawyers: With expertise in various areas, including business finance law, corporate law, and financial technology law, our team provides tailored legal advice.

Client-Centered Approach: We prioritize our clients’ needs, offering transparent, efficient, and cost-effective legal solutions.

Top Banking Law Firms: As one of the top banking law firms, BlackSuit Legal Services stands out for its dedication to helping businesses and individuals navigate the complexities of finance and banking law.

Tailored Legal Solutions for Businesses and Corporations

At BlackSuit, we understand that businesses need legal partners who can provide not just legal advice, but practical solutions. Our corporate lawyers and business law lawyers work closely with you to manage corporate legal matters, from corporate finance law to business disputes and corporate litigation.

Corporate Litigation Lawyer: We handle business-related litigation, ensuring your company’s rights and interests are protected.

Business Law Lawyer: From corporate governance to contract drafting and disputes, BlackSuit provides a comprehensive legal service for businesses of all sizes.

Conclusion

BlackSuit Legal Services is your trusted partner in navigating the complexities of finance, banking, and corporate law. With expertise across financial law, corporate finance, and regulatory compliance, we provide tailored legal services for businesses, financial institutions, and individuals. Whether you’re a financial advisor, fintech startup, NBFC, or corporation, BlackSuit Legal Services delivers expert legal support that meets your specific needs.

For legal representation that prioritizes your success, contact BlackSuit Legal Services today to schedule a consultation. We are ready to help you tackle your legal challenges with confidence.

[litigationattorneydallas]

Dallas Business Litigation Law Firm: Experienced Representation for Your Business Disputes

If you're facing a business dispute in Texas, you need experienced legal representation to protect your interests and achieve favorable outcomes. Our Texas-based business litigation law firm offers comprehensive legal services, including dispute resolution, contract negotiations, and aggressive advocacy in court. Our attorneys have the knowledge, skills, and resources to handle complex business disputes and help you achieve your goals. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help with your business litigation needs.

[almatyconsultingsblog]

Top Litigation Services in Kazakhstan - Expert Commercial, Construction, Business & Corporate Litigation Attorneys Our law firm in Kazakhstan offers comprehensive Litigation Services in Kazakhstan with a focus on Commercial Litigation Attorney in Kazakhstan, Construction Litigation Attorney in Kazakhstan, and Business Litigation Law Firm in Kazakhstan. Our seasoned Corporate Litigation Attorney in Kazakhstan is dedicated to providing strategic legal solutions for your business disputes. Trust our experienced team to handle complex litigation cases with professionalism and expertise, ensuring your business interests are well-protected in Kazakhstan's legal landscape. Contact us today for top-notch litigation services tailored to your needs.

[guardianlegalgrp]

Website : http://guardianlegalgrp.com

Address : 15760 Ventura Blvd. Unit 1905, Encino, CA 91436

Phone : +1 818-287-7099

A short description: Welcome to Guardian Legal Group, where we are dedicated to providing our clients with the highest standard of legal representation. As the brainchild of founding partners Mike Dermendjian and Hakop Zakaryan, our capabilities span across different disciplines, helping clients face legal challenges with ease. We collaborate with clients to provide innovative and tailor-made solutions, while cultivating relationships that enhance and simplify the client experience. Guardian Legal Group's main areas of practice include Personal Injury, Lemon Law, Civil Litigation, Business Law, Property Damage, and Contract Law. Contact us today for a free consultation regarding your case!

[keithbfrenchlaw]

Reasons to Hire a Truck Accident Attorney to Help You

There are more and more truck crashes these days. Gaining complete compensation for your damages is a skill that a lawyer with experience in representing victims of commercial vehicle accidents can offer. Your claim needs to be handled by a lawyer who can look out for your best interests at all times.

Some justifications for why you require Houston truck accident lawyers in order to receive complete justice are listed below.

Locate Every Responsible Party It becomes challenging to determine who is responsible for the injuries sustained in every truck accident. Your attorney will support you in identifying all responsible parties and guarantee that you will receive payment within the allotted time frame. Handle Complicated Negotiations If more than one party is found to be at fault for your accident, you will have to sue them all at once in order to receive your just compensation. Make sure your attorney does everything possible to increase the case's value. Offer a Suitable Legal Approach You may not know how to choose the best course of action to take in order to get your case ready for trial if you were a collision victim. Expert witnesses and the necessary evidence may be found, your lawyer can conduct a thorough analysis of your case, choose the best course of action to ensure you receive all the compensation you are entitled to, and more. Make Sure Comparative Fault Laws Are Implemented Accurately Texas has a comparative fault statute, just like other states, which has an impact on the total amount of money you can get for your injury. Should your proportion of fault be less than fifty per cent, you will be compensated. Together with your Houston trucking accident attorney, you may create a compelling case that guarantees the rule of law is applied equitably.

Wrapping Up In order to give you more time to focus on your recuperation, Houston truck accident lawyers can assist you with filing your legal claim. You won't have to go it alone on the road to justice when you have an experienced attorney guiding you through every stage of the legal procedure.

[fawziamlaw]

A commercial litigation attorney specializes in managing cases and disputes that may arise in business scenarios.  These litigations may include issues such as disagreement between the business partners, a lawsuit filed for sales and purchase contracts, and issues related to compliance and commercial laws.

[posternockd]

At Posternock Apell, PC, our trusted estate planning lawyers are here to walk through the various strategies that can be used in protecting assets through the use of real estate for your disabled loved one. For more information contact our Estate Planning Attorneys in New Jersey and call us today at 856-214-8797.