#lei does stem school
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
pov you're the only theatre kid in your class and the whole class has to do a stage play for midterms so they decided to make you director (i've directed films two times this year but never a play) but you don't want to direct because you want to be on the stage but you also don't want the play/musical to be a disaster so you have no choice but to direct it
#sigh#we also have like less than a month to do this#stem school be like#i just wanted to act tho#even in a not principal role i'll take it#gotta direct a whole ass class now ig#if i say stage right and they have no idea what that is#i'm fine#broadway#musical theatre#broadway musicals#musicals#theatre kid#musical#theatre#lei does stem school
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Tainted Eve Prologue ~ Sayo's Story
(DBL is a game with mature themes, so reader beware. Sayo does go through abuse from members of the church, so please do not read if that will negatively affect you.)
“Eve….Awaken.”
“Annoying…” Sayo sighed.
“What was that?!” one of the nuns snapped, slapping her hand down on the table in front of her.
“Nothing,” Sayo forced a smile. “I’ve finished work for the day. That is all you needed me for, right?”
The nun narrowed her eyes at Sayo, but let it go. “You’re free to go. Make sure you aren’t late to school or I’ll hear about it from your father.”
“Never been late before.”
The nun swung her arm in a flash, the back of her hand slapping Sayo’s cheek.
“Obnoxious child!” the nun exclaimed before stomping away.
That wasn’t unexpected. She was aware her words probably wouldn’t sit well with the particular woman in front of her. Everything she did never sat well with any of the nuns working at the church her ‘parents’ were in charge of.
Sayori Makina was adopted. Kizuna and Ayumi Makina had only taken her in because they were paid handsomely to do so. And the person who paid them? Karlheinz Sakamaki, known by some as the king of the vampires. You would think a being such as a vampire would be strongly rejected by the two people who ran a church, however, it wasn’t doing well at the time. In exchange for the money he offered up front and the promise of financial support in the future, they agreed to take Sayo in and go along with his plan for her future. A future she was strongly rejecting.
After changing and getting her things ready, she began her walk to school. Most students she knew didn’t walk to and from school, especially considering it was a night school, but it wasn’t like anybody from the church was going to drive her.
Her friend Kisa Fujimoto’s mother had offered to drive her multiple times, but she always felt too bad to agree. She had a hard time accepting people trying to go out of their way to help her. It was a bad habit, something she had gotten better at recently, but it all stemmed from how she was raised….
“Sayo? Hey, are you even listening?”
Sayo lifted her head from her desk. The school day had ended and her and her friends were the only ones in the classroom. Leiko Koizumi was leaning towards Sayo from her seat at the desk next to her.
“Of course I’m listening,” Sayo sat up straight.
“Liar,” Lei grinned. “I know you too well to believe that. Getting lost in thought is your thing.”
“You’ve caught me,” she chuckled. “What were you saying?”
“We were talking about our next practice,” Kisa grinned, leaning against Sayo’s desk.
Emi Akiyama was with them as well. The four had been friends since elementary school. Before she had met Lei or Kisa, Sayo had only been close to Emi. The two were often holed up on their own in the library during their free time. Sayo was avoiding going home, just like she did now, and Emi was so shy at the time that she followed Sayo around like a lost duck because she didn’t talk to very many people.
That all changed when Kisa transferred in. She was loud and energetic, which rubbed some people the wrong way, but despite that, she was quick to make friends. Out of everyone, she grew extremely close to Lei because of their shared love of music.
Secretly, Emi admired Kisa from afar. She saw many of the things she lacked as a person in Kisa, and wished she had even a fraction of Kisa’s confidence. After a while, Kisa caught on. And so, she made it her mission to befriend the shy girl who liked her so much and, consequently, the bookworm who Emi hid behind when she was embarrassed. Kisa would purposely seek them out in the library, dragging Lei with her as well. Eventually, the four became inseparable.
Currently, Emi and Kisa were in a different class than Lei and Sayo. Even so, each day after school ended the two would join them. Whether they were working on homework together, studying, or just talking, it didn’t matter as long as they were doing something together.
During their first year of high school, the group decided to start a band. Kisa learned how to play bass and guitar as a child, and Lei had learned to play the drums in junior high. Emi’s mother loved playing the piano, and had taught her as a child as well, so she already knew how to play an instrument. That left Sayo. She didn’t have the money to buy her own. But since Kisa favored the bass, she taught Sayo how to play the guitar. After years of practice, Kisa wanted to put their skills to good use. They had already been writing songs together, so the next step would be performing.
They started off small, playing for whatever random events or places that would let them. The group was just looking for experience and to make a name for themselves, even if it was small, so they didn’t require payment. Eventually their band, Bitter Step, gained a following big enough to be regular performers at a dance club. It was an understatement to say they were grateful. The band was their pride and joy. They just wanted to continue doing what they loved.
“Yes," Emi smiled, munching on a cookie she had baked before school. “My plans for this weekend changed, so I’m able to do it Friday after all.”
Emi had passed out cookies to the rest of them as well earlier. The other girls had already finished them.
“The usual work, Sayo?” Lei asked.
“Does indeed,” she agreed.
“Then it’s settled,” Lei wrote it down in the planner she always carried with her. “Since we’ve figured that out, I should probably head home now. It’s getting pretty late.”
“That’s true...” Emi glanced at her phone to see the time. “I have to get home as well. I still have a lot of work to get done…”
Considering the two had announced it was time to go, everyone began packing up their things.
“Procrastinating on homework again, huh?” Kisa couldn’t help but laugh. “You never change, Emi. I’ll come with you so I can help, alright?”
“Thank you so much!” Emi smiled, her cheeks dusted pink.
“Come on, come on,” Kisa grabbed her hand and pulled her towards the door. “You’re too slow~”
“Yes, I’m coming!” Emi exclaimed, trying to match Kisa’s pace.
Lei and Sayo laughed, following after the two. They all exchanged goodbyes once they had reached the school entrance before going their separate ways. This was a normal day for them.
“Eve. You are the original. You must awaken. Awaken, Eve. Awaken.”
And as of a few days ago, that voice echoing through her head was becoming normal as well. It was the voice of Karlheinz Sakamaki, trying to push her into finally going along with his twisted plan...
Karlheinz had done nothing but torture her ever since she had known him. The day they first met, everything went to hell, for both her and her adoptive parents. That day, a tragedy struck, one that would have made her parents reject that large sum of money when he first approached them with the infant Sayo had they known it would occur.
Their real child, Shiro, died that day. And ever since then, they had blamed her because it was easier than blaming the man who helped keep the church in business. Her relationship with them had always been rocky at best, so it was rather easy for them to completely turn on her. They left her in the care of the nuns and only spoke to her when necessary. But of course, simply abandoning her to others wasn’t cruel enough. Instead, they told the nuns to treat her cruelly, like a servant, like someone who was subhuman. And so, they treated her terribly. Any nun who tried to show her any semblance of kindness was driven away. That was how much her parents hated her. And after her outburst that god didn’t exist shortly after her brother’s death, the nuns came to hate her as well.
Sayo had come to terms with that a long time ago. Trying to survive in such an environment was a lot harder when she was younger. But at seventeen, she was fully capable of silently doing her work and keeping out of the way. She had her moments, of course, like earlier that day. When she was in a bad mood, it wasn’t uncommon to accidentally say something to the wrong person and get slapped around in return.
Unlike a few years ago, they no longer tried to do worse. She had grown too much to make it easy for them. When she fought back, it would take multiple people to hold her down to accept her punishment. The nuns simply got tired of it after a few tries. It wasn’t worth the effort. They all knew, at this point, there was no getting through to her. Besides, they were just biding their time until she was finally gone.
The nuns didn’t know the specific details as to why, but they knew her parents were planning on pawning her off to some other family. The story that had spread throughout the church was that they were trying to arrange for her to marry the son of one of the church’s beneficiaries. Once that engagement was finalized, they planned to ship her off to live with them. Sayo hated that the rumor wasn’t that far off from the truth. In a way, her parents were going to give her back to Karlheinz, so that she could fulfill her role in his “Adam and Eve” plan.
This was something she was trying to oppose more than anything. Her role as “Eve” was to find her “Adam”...meaning Karlheinz was specifically trying to set her up with one of his sons. From what she understood, he thought he could somehow create a superior race if the plan succeeded. Sayo didn’t understand how that was even possible and had no desire to find out. She had figured out both families of vampires were sadistic and looked down on humans, treating them horribly. She had found out as much from the other Eve, Yui Komori.
Karlheinz had arranged for them to meet a couple of months ago, unbeknownst to his sons. Ironically, he was in a power struggle with Sayo. Since she was the one he originally chose to be Eve, he wanted her to willingly participate in his plan. It would make things go more smoothly. Since she knew about the plan, if she denied her role, even if he forced her to live with his sons, there could be problematic side effects. Either way, her stubborn refusal was a problem. Yui, on the other hand, knew nothing of the plan, so there was no way for her to deny her role as the second Eve.
He thought meeting the girl she would be living with would help Sayo accept her role, but it had quite the opposite effect. When they were alone, Yui told her some of the horrible things the Sakamaki brothers had done. She was appalled. Those stories made her want to run for the hills and only strengthened her resolve to deny Karlheinz and his plan with everything she had.
As much as Sayo wished she could help Yui get out of that situation, there was nothing she could do. Yui didn’t mind. She still didn’t know about the Adam and Eve plan, and assumed Sayo was another “prospective bride”. All she wanted was for Sayo to continue resisting so they wouldn’t share the same fate.
“Eve. Awaken, Eve. You do not have the luxury of watching from the sidelines. You must find your Adam.”
Sayo could suddenly see a flash of a glass pavilion. She had seen it before in her dreams. There was a large apple tree growing in the middle of it. Just like usual, it wasn’t blooming...but it wasn’t dying either. The only time she wanted to see that damn vision was if the tree was finally dying. She shook her head furiously to rid herself of it.
'Shut up! I don’t want to be a part of your sick game!'
Considering she was hearing Karlheinz’s voice more frequently, she had a feeling something would happen very soon. Exactly what, she wasn’t sure. All she knew was that after the meeting with Yui, he was giving her a little time to accept things. The next time he talked to her, he was expecting a more reasonable answer….although his idea of reasonable differed immensely from hers.
Unfortunately, she was right on the mark. When she got home, she noticed there was a limo parked outside the church. That certainly wasn’t normal. She had a bad feeling about this. Trying her best to ignore it, she walked by it, trying to get around to the back entrance. However, the door opened before she could get far. Sayo glared once she realized who was exiting the car.
“I was going to offer you a ride home, but thought better of it considering you were spending time with those friends of yours,” Karlheinz smiled at her.
“I wouldn’t have accepted,” she tried to walk past him, but he held an arm out to stop her.
“Please wait. We are going to have this discussion either way. Would you rather I wake up your parents, so they are present to hear what I have to say?”
Her parents would only complicate things, so she would rather not get them involved. Talking to all three of them pissed her off very easily, although that man could put her in a rage all on his own. She was surprised he was willing to speak with her without them. If she was alone, she was more likely to attack him. She had a few times in the past, not that it ever worked. As much as she wanted to, it was pointless.
“Shall we have this discussion in the car? If we go inside, someone might report it to your parents.”
“Whatever,” she grumbled.
“You have a much cooler head than usual,” Karlheinz noted as the two got into the limo.
That was certainly true. It wasn’t uncommon for her to immediately lash out at him in rage the moment she saw him. That happened less frequently the past few times he had come to speak with her. She still despised him, but had learned to keep her cool, even if she was thinking nasty things the entire time.
“Don’t misunderstand. I would rip your head off if I got the chance,” there was a sickly sweet smile on her face.
“Let us put any feelings we may have of each other aside so we can have a proper discussion. I am sure you know why I am here.”
“To try to convince me to accept that I am Eve,” she stated, rolling her eyes. “And, like usual, you’ll fail to do so.”
“Not quite. I have realized that the only way you will accept you are Eve is when you find your Adam. At first, I thought it would be best for you to move in with my sons-”
“No way in hell,” her answer was immediate.
“Hear me out before you outright refuse.”
“Why should I? Yui told me plenty of things about her time living with them. Do you really think I’ll agree to moving in when they’re just going to try to control what I do and treat me like a blood bag? No thanks.”
“You did not let me finish. Originally, I wanted you to move in with my sons, but I have changed my mind.”
She stared, baffled. What on earth could cause his change of heart? She would never understand him.
“Before I continue, I have something for you. Call it a peace offering.”
He pulled something out of his jacket pocket before holding it out for her. Sayo glanced down, fairly skeptical as to what it was. But she was shocked. It was a new pocket knife, much nicer than the one she had currently.
“Why are you giving me this?” She questioned, but took it anyway before he could change his mind.
“It is silver. I thought you might appreciate a new one.”
“What’s the catch?” She narrowed her eyes at him.
“There is none, child. I will say, I am surprised. You have mellowed out quite a bit since the last few times we have spoken.”
He wasn’t wrong. But her rage never fazed him.
“You giving me this does not mean I won’t use it on you if I get the chance,” she stated, deciding to be blunt.
He ignored the comment. “Now, I shall continue. I have decided you are more suited for the Mukami family. I know enough about your human life to understand what you desire-”
“That is bullshit-”
“Just listen, child. I know my sons well enough to know they will try to put an end to the life with your friends that you desire. That is why the Mukami family is a better fit for you.”
“I don’t care if they are a better fit for me. That does not change my stance on this. I will not take part in your plan. I am not your Eve. You found a new one. What more do you want?”
“The Mukami brothers failed to become Adam. I wish to see if that will be different with you.”
“Like I give a damn what you want. That doesn’t change the fact that they’re a family of vampires. I am not a blood bag and I am not Eve. Me being there will not lead to the outcome you want.”
“That is not something you can say for sure.”
“Sure it is,” she crossed her arms across her chest.
This conversation wasn’t going anywhere. His attempts at persuasion never did. She had heard him out for long enough.
“If that’s all, I’ll be going,” she stood up.
“I am not finished. I have given you plenty of time to consider this. I have waited long enough. You will admit to the Mukami brothers that you will be Eve by the end of next week…or there will be consequences.”
She didn’t reply, choosing to get out of the limo in silence. Karlheinz made no attempt to stop her. He had given his final warning. It was time to move forward with his plan…whether she was willing or not. Hopefully she would choose to accept it because of his threat, but he knew her well enough to figure she would be too stubborn. But he didn’t need her to agree at this point. The cogs of fate would start turning either way. He had an ace up his sleeve, after all.
Sayo was grateful that man let her go. Just that short interaction was exhausting. All she wanted to do was go inside and get to bed. She had work to do before school, after all. She was used to getting little sleep, but had no intention of shortening how much she got tonight.
As she was laying in bed, she couldn’t help but dwell on the conversation. Yui hadn’t told her anything about the Mukami brothers when they first met. From what Karlheinz had said, they had attempted to become Adam already through Yui. So what had she experienced with them? Was it similar to her time with the Sakamaki brothers? Talking to Yui at school could earn her unwanted attention from those vampires. She wanted to know what she would be up against, though, if the Mukami brothers went after her. If something happened after her week was up, maybe she would just have to risk going to Yui to get that information….
She sighed. This whole situation was a pain in the ass. Eventually she would need to make a plan on what to do about the Mukamis after her week was up, but that would have to wait. She was too exhausted to think about it anymore. And so, she fell into a restless sleep, the anxiety of the situation continuing to eat at her through her dreams.
Sayori could struggle all she wanted, but it is not easy to change one's fate. At least she had been spared from the Sakamaki brothers. She was unaware of it, but the Mukami family did have a sense of humanity deep down. They had been human, after all. And Yui's kindness did end up affecting them during her time there. Her savior truly was Yui. If she had not become an Eve, Sayori would have suffered a much crueler fate....
Chapter One
#tainted eve#sayo#sayori makina#diabolik oc#diabolik lovers#diabolik lovers oc#diabolik lovers fanfiction#diabolik brothers#diabolik boys#diabolik lovers boys#sakamaki brothers#mukami brothers#ruki mukami#yuma mukami#kou mukami#azusa mukami#ayato sakamaki#laito sakamaki#kanato sakamaki#reiji sakamaki#shu sakamaki#subaru sakamaki#karlheinz sakamaki
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
1 note
·
View note
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
0 notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
According to relevant social media posts in the United States, this incident originated from an article published by The Economist magazine on July 28th criticizing Saudi Crown Prince Salman, or more precisely, a picture used as the magazine cover in the article with racist connotations. The Economist chose to refer to Salman himself with an image wearing a pink checkered headscarf, which is very common in Arab countries. But due to the addition of a bomb next to the headscarf in this picture, it is clear that this composition is demonizing the Arabs, causing protests from many people.
At present, The Economist has not provided a response to this controversial incident, nor has it removed the group of images suspected of racism and discrimination against Arabs.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
0 notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
0 notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
0 notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
0 notes
Text
as an actor who got kind of forced into directing, i'm debating whether i should literally take directing as an act and give them the whole "we still don't have a show" speech, or should i be myself and be like "guys it's a week till opening but we can do this"
#sigh#this is more stressful than i thought it would be#especially when your senior class acts like children#big respect to great directors#musical theatre#musicals#theatre kid#musical#theatre#lei does stem school
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
About Akarsha
Part 2! This is the same deal as my “About Diya” post, so you can press the hyperlinks to find the source with extra detail!
She is 5’4
Akarsha doesn’t expect Noelle to reciprocate her feelings, so she’s careful to always flirt with her in a way that can be construed as a joke.
She is Indian
Her birthday is 4/20
She is the second oldest of the Deke Squad
Akarsha didn’t realize Noelle overheard her outburst in the gym
She would play games like Team Fortress 2 and Overwatch with Min
Out of D.A.M.N. she is the only real hardcore anime fan
Now that she knows “Sakura”, “Yuki”, and Ester, she has weeb friends to talk about anime to
Akarsha is interested in STEM and becomes a software engineer
She would come out via a stupid bi joke
If she had a cat, she would name something better than “Nyaruto,” like “Speed Stank”
She actually cheats on tests, which weighs on her conscience (as seen in the auditorium). She stops later.
Her hair goes down about halfway between her shoulders and elbow. It looks less because she has fine hair. (See image in this link from Asks 20)
Her favorite movie would probably be an anime movie
She plays the shortstop position. Shortstop fields many balls, giving her many opportunities to mess up and invent new excuses
When angry, she tries to yell/argue, and ends up angry-crying. She uses humor to mask her feelings, so when she’s seriously upset, everything ends up coming to the surface at once.
She likes personality tests and quizzes like “Which Naruto character are you?”
Her personality type is ESFP
Akarsha is smart despite acting dumb, but doesn’t do well on tests (B+/A- is unfortunately considered not doing well in her environment)
She would not have pursued a friendship with Diya under normal circumstances
She became friends with Noelle by pranking her (see long details in Ask 13!)
She has known she was bi for about a year at the time of Butterfly Soup. Spending a lot of time on the Internet helped her awareness
Her dad’s sense of humor is similar to her, and her parents are “big weirdos” so they mostly get along (More details on her dad in Asks 14)
She is only fluent in English because her parents worried about her fitting in and only smoke to her in English
She knows a bit of Spanish from classes at school
Her parents pressure her to know her career and often brag to other parents of her smartness and successfulness
Because of this, she feels like she doesn’t have things together like she should and worries she is not smart and will end up as a failure
When sick, she milks it for sympathy and excuses for what she has done. She acts like she’s on her deathbed and looks pitiful. She also blows her nose with a loud honking noise.
She would not wear double denim
Her windbreaker was based on an image Brianna Lei found (see image in the link here)
Her family is Hindu
She is agnostic, but halfway goes along with it for her family. She eats beef.
She likes junk food like Twinkies, pizza, french fries, etc.
Her favorite cuisine is Mexican food, and her second-favorite is American food
She also likes California burritos, avocados, funnel cake, and Icees
Her favorite fruits are pineapple and kiwi
She and Min dare each other to eat ghost peppers
If she played D&D, she’d be a bard
She taught Noelle what seme meant because she was reading yaoi and it came up in conversation (See 16 for more details!)
Following her conversation with Noelle, she changed her chat name to YAOI SEME (as seen in-game)
She makes weed jokes but only does it rarely
In Overwatch, she is an ironic Torb main and a useless Sombra (see Asks 17 for more details!)
She considers herself a gamer
She likes DS games like Ace Attorney and is addicted to Maplestory
She likes a lot of Ace Attorney characters, but her favorite is Phoenix because she finds him relatable. If someone asks her, she will say it is Spark Bruschel (see image in Asks 17)
She has watched magical girl shows, and her favorite is Madoka Magica
Her posture is not that good
In songs that say Noelle (Teenage Dirtbag) and Noel (like in Christmas songs), Akarsha points it out saying, “It’s you Noelle”
Her surprised sprite is based off of Trucy’s surprised sprite from Ace Attorney. Brianna Lei loves how over-the-top it looks
She went as Guy Fieri for Halloween
During trick-or-treating, she jumped out at the group from behind bushes a few times (see Asks 18 for more details!)
She had a pet snail in elementary school, but accidentally killed it when she tried to wash it with shampoo. She still mourns it
She would not make cuck jokes
She is a middle child
During horror movies, she is jokey and tries to scare the others by grabbing their arms and appearing behind them during tense moments
She screams during horror movies (see more details in Ask 20!)
She goes far away to college, others would have to take a plane if they wanted to see her
Her taste in music is eclectic, with a variety of hip-hop, anime openings, etc.
That’s it! (●'◡'●)
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
please lets not be shitty
tws for talk of racism, eugen/cs, n*zis, slavery, genocide, etc. read at your own risk but please be aware this message is important. so this isnt specifically related to hetagames but its related to hetalia and i think its important that everyone hear it again just to be sure. im going to shelve my rabid persona for a minute because this is super important and a super serious thing.
making hetalia OCs or 2ps or personifying characters based off of problematic time periods from their history is not okay.
some examples include: -n*zi germany this is so wrong for so many obvious reasons everyone should know by now but for the sake of the post im gonna go into detail a lilbit. so many people were killed and both physically and mentally tortured during this time period, a large group being jewish people. during this time period german schools taught eugen/cs to their children which was a h i g l y racist concept. n*zis basically hated everyone that wasnt a blonde blue eyed ‘pure blood’ german. everyone else deserved to die according to them, and thats just.... not something that you make an anime boy about? like no. please. -civil war era america/the confederacy/the confederate states of america this one some people seem to think is okay for??? some goddamn reason??? no??? okay i know a lot of non-americans might not understand what exactly the civil war was so here we go heres a very watered down explanation. once upon a time there was slavery in america. we all know that. but at one point the public opinion shifted to thinking ‘hmm, maybe slavery is actually really fukin gross and bad? hey lets pass a law to ban slavery.’ and the southern states went ‘wait no we like slavery.’ and they went and said ‘this law would violate our constitutional right to states rights. we should be able to choose whether or not each state has laws against slavery!’ which is bs by the way they just wanted to keep owning slaves but they called it a violation of states rights so they could start a war over this shit. so then the south decided to form the confederacy and then they declared war on the north to try and break away n have their ‘right’ to own slaves. by the way this wasnt just a buncha racists fighting for their right to own people a lot of them also made their slaves fight in the war. so black people were being forced to fight for their own enslavement. lovely. spoiler alert they lost hella bad and the emancipation proclamation was signed which helped pave the way for black people to be free. the confederacy through its entire short life stood for nothing but slavery and racism and that is n o t something that its okay to make an anime boy out of okay please stop this.
-Communist Russia okay look. look. stop what youre going to say and read this. okay? okay. yes i know himaruya kind of wrote about this already. no that does not make it okay. hes human just like anyone else and hes realized his problems and faults and doesnt write that shit anymore. and even if he hadnt thats no excuse. even if he had kept making it that wouldnt make it okay. creators arent perfect and everything they do isnt automatically moral. popular people do stupid insensitive shit all the time and they have to be held accountable for it. anyway if you really need to be told why communist russia isnt good ‘uwu anime boy’ fodder then you really need to read a history book. but in short; genocide. mass starvation of their own people. imperialism. etc. bad shit. lets not.
-Mafia AU Romano okay this isnt really a time period perse but it felt like it belonged on the list so i put it on. its my list i can add what i want. so anyway ive seen southern italian people express blatant discomfort with this before, and from what i remember it stems from both racism and classism to a certain extend and thats just.... uncomfy. i get the appeal of a mafia au ok some people find crime hot but if its blatantly making people uncomfortable then id suggest you stop. other peoples comfort is more important than your fanfic. just make some generic crime lord au or summ instead idk it dont have to be the mafia all the time an it dont have to be romano all the time. if anyone who has a better feel for this wants to expand on it be my guest.
anyway im sure theres many more but these are the things i see the most. feel free to rb and add your own “please dont”s to the list. an before anyone gets on me about “why is this stuff bad but things like ancient rome arent” look ancient rome did about as much bad shit as england did but we dont all cancel mister arthur monster brows do we? the difference is these examples are narrowing a character down to one specific problematic period of their history (or in the case of the mafia thing one single small problematic part of the countrys history) and ancient rome represents the entirety of the countrys existance which did more than just imperialism and murder and shit. ok mun lei out now.
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
0 notes
Note
YAKU HC’S EEEEEEEEE
— HATES BEING CALLED SHORT this is like a known fact but EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW THIS
— thinks hes hot sht despite being short af lmaooooo
— tried asking a girl out once but got rejected💔never again now he just focuses on volleyball
— barely spoke to kuroo at school before because of ~cultural differences~ but now they talk to each other on a daily basis. they dont eat lunch together doe
— probably lives near a park and he jogs around the perimeter of it
— likes cats more bc his neighbor has a giant af dog that almost knocked him over once
— knows how to swim but has bad memories at the beach
— likes camping
— has been to hawaii once, he has this weird pic of him on his phone with a cute purple lei around his neck its top tier quality he hides it from the rest of the world doe
— secretly thinks lev is funny
— prob really bad at stem topics (especially chem which is why he didnt get along w kuroo)
— likes english/literature more
alright i have prodded the deepest parts of my brain and thats all i can think of!! thank you hunny ily!!!
9 notes
·
View notes
Note
Do you have any headcanons about how the Polycule helps alter downworld relations? Like obviously it’s not just them, but having high-ranking/leading downworlders all loving/trusting each other is bound to make a difference. Although I hate the whole vampire/werewolf rivalry in the show, I like to hc the tension as stemming from 1. The Clave being a dick and working to separate oppressed communities and 2. The fact that immortality/mortality really makes a difference in POV.
YEAAAA BOIII
i mean i completely agree about the vampire/werewolf thing (i mean i just answered an ask about that and stuff so u know). like i don’t hate it in concept but i hate the execution, it could have been great and shown us a lot about how white/shadowhunter supremacy works to alienate different oppressed communities and this make organizing and fighting back harder or even inviable, but nooo of course they had to go with naturalizing the whole thing because god forbid there’s good lore and metaphor
anyway! i do think that the polycule does a lot to change that, not even (just) because of their relationship, but because, they, like... truly believe in bringing their communities together and making them stronger, and are all actively working to do that as leaders. it’s part of what even got their relationships started, really - the fact that they had all been working together to bring their communities closer, and halfway through they realized, oh shit i might actually love them
but getting into more detail!
i have already talked many times about how i think that after the whole jonathan fiasco, seelies would have wanted to radically change their external policies, because, well..... it clearly was only working against them and their own rights and needs, including those to leave the realm, interact with other species (that’s part of their nature! they’re one with all beings, how can they be isolated from them??) and just general freedom, you know? and it didn’t even help them keep physically safe, much to the contrary. the world almost ended and they wouldn’t have been kept safe
and whether or not u hc meliorn as the new seelie queen or as keeping their position as a kind of.... ambassador in this realm, they’re extremely valuable, because they’re one of the few seelies who actually know about the non-seelie cultures, customs, political relations and etc. since most seelies were kept away in their realms, they don’t know where to start, and meliorn has very valuable knowledge, plus again, they’re very loyal to the seelie realm and want to see them thriving
so meliorn definitely works to get the seelies to build meaningful relationships with other downworlder communities. it helps that they already know magnus, raphael, maia, and luke, all important people in that sense. i’ve talked a little bit about how i think their attempts to get closer would go - offering tokens of alliance to other downworlders, teaching warlocks about the workings of their own magic and their knowledge on the forces of nature and ley lines, just generally trying to pick their interest and build something together
i definitely think that seelies would consider education the way to go here - they are the keepers of knowledge after all, so that’s definitely something extremely important in their culture. a treasure if you will. and they know how teaching, exploring, learning and creating can bring people together, help them understand each other, and form meaningful alliances. after all, building knowledge together means that a part of how you think is inherently tied to the other’s culture, and that makes alienating, stereotyping or turning people against each other a lot harder
i say “building knowledge” because i know “keepers of knowledge” kind of implies that knowledge is... a kind of substance, that exists, that can be contained. but really knowledge is ever chaging, it is constantly creating and recreating itself as we create new languages and tools to describe, understand and think of the world around us. and we’re always creating new things too, new technologies, new concepts, new machines, new spells (in sh lore), new laws and societal organizations and ways to help each other.... the world is ever changing and so is the way we think about it. and seelies know that too; they might be immortal, but they’re not static, because the world isn’t either. that’s also why i think that being locked away from other realms was particularly violent towards them - they were being forced into a state of unchangeness that goes against their very nature, that alienates them from their own core
anyway! sorry for nerding out about science and the nature of knowledge. what i’m trying to say here is that for seelies, knowing other cultures and getting educated, educating, and just thinking are extremely precious and valuable. so i definitely think that through things like, i don’t know, creating magical schools where them and warlocks can share their different knowledges and way of using magic, sharing their own conceptualization of the world and listening to others’, trying to create new things together, is a powerful way to build alliances, know each other, and make each other stronger. you know? so in that sense they basically bet on education as a way to bring communities closer, and raise new people with a new mindset who see things differently, in a less... prejudiced, i guess? way
i feel like warlocks are the ones who have the best relationship with the other downworlder communities - possibly because they are needed by all of them - so magnus would be the one who would have the least work to do here dauhdsauhd i mean not that he’s part of the polycule but you know. he kind of acts as consultant to all of them, and sometimes, warlock territory can be some kind of neutral ground for other downworlders to discuss and negotiate, knowing that they’re all welcome and that they aren’t at risk because all shadowhunters are there. pack and clan territories are no-nos and the seelie realm is still adjusting to some quite radical changes, not to mention can be a little unsettling because many people have simply never been there. so i think warlock spaces can become very important territories for other downworlder leaders to meet, build strategies and share
we’ve also seen a little bit on how saia helped build a new paradigm for vampire/werewolves relationships in canon, how their bet was on building communal spaces and communities, you know? like places where they could all coexist and meet, like Taki’s. with raphael into the mix, that’s just. a very promising territory
with raphael in it it means that Taki’s is officially co-run by werewolves and vampires, which in itself makes it feel a little safer - like, vampires might not be as willing to go to taki’s before because it was a werewolf place, even if it wasn’t really, you know? but with raphael there it most definitely isn’t, and that helps them feel a little more comfortable, more willing to go and also to be open and meet new people instead of keeping to their usual circles
also! there’s the very specific situation within the NY clan. we see in sh canon how seelies are a society, warlocks are a community, and werewolf packs are a family, but the NYC clan is not like that at all. it seems like they like each other (mostly) but they’re scattered, they’re not really an unit, or a community
this is definitely because of camille - decades of having a clan leader who did her very damn best to keep other vampires oppressed under her rule and dependant on her meant letting their ways of mutual support dwindle, their relationships fail, and their existence be centered on the dependency they have on her. so once raphael becomes clan leader, he has a lot to do, and the first step is to rebuild the NY clan itself
which. i’ve mentioned in passing in many asks, i know! but i just love the idea of raphael slowly turning the clan into a community, into family, again. getting rid of all the ridiculous cold-feeling, unwelcoming decoration and creating a big, attractive communal space, with less harsh lightning, more colors, more places to sit, games, fucking TV, books. spaces where they can be together and share and create and just chill, you know? the interior design of camille’s clan was extremely hostile, it was built for people to be kept away and segregated in their little spaces, not together, and i’m absolutely sure this was intentional. so raphael takes important steps in the opposite direction: making the place welcoming, lively, theirs
it’s not just the place, either. once the war is over and they finally have the chance to breathe, raphael also changes radically the way things are run. instead of a highly centralized leadership, he starts discussing decisions with the whole clan, putting it to a vote. soon his work is way less making decisions and way more organizing their routine so they’re able to make them, together. soon everyone is participating in decisions. soon they’re making sure everyone’s needs are being met
soon they are building their own supporting spaces for vampires battling addiction (since that’s a huge problem for them for many reasons), soon they are getting closer to warlock scholars/therapists and such that can help them with these issues, building alliances in that sense too, where they can help each other with their communitie’s needs. soon they’re getting pets because why the hell not? (cats in particular love raphael) and every stray has a home in the clan because well. they are all strays, lost and found there. life is a lot better, and happier, and once the clan is strong enough to get back on its feet and empower vampires again, then he starts working on getting closer to other downworlders, especially the werewolves
which is how we get to taki’s because again! i’m a slut. look, raphael is a great cook and he’s good at organizing stuff and he understands food in a visceral way that means he also understands what taki’s is all about - he understands that food is community, it’s culture, it’s bringing people together. he’s probably the person who best understands the concept of taki’s the way maia does, a place to bring people together, a place to build a new future. just by hearing about it, he immediately gets what maia’s idea with taki’s is, and just by hearing raphael talk about food, she immediately knows that raphael is perfect to help her. so they get to it
but taki’s is just, well, one thing. i mean it’s a very important thing that they both worked extremely hard on and that brought amazing fruits that they never truly expected. it becomes a safe space, a hangout place, a place for people to meet others and to seek help when needed and to discuss politics and downworlder relations, all in one. the tables are big and communal and the place is messy in the best possible way, with everyone mingling, talking, getting to know each other without being overwhelming. and it’s great, and maia and raphael are extremely proud of the work they’ve done there, and sometimes they kind of just lie back and look at what they have created and it’s like. wow. and they smile at each other and raphael kisses her hand and says “it’s all because of you, bella” and she smiles so brightly at him and laces their fingers together and-
back to politics. yes. community building. i can do this. i can not be a whore for maiaphael for one second. i believe in myself
anyway they also make it a frequent thing to just like, meet? and create a vampires-werewolves alliance that doesn’t just spam NYC, but all their allied clans/packs and tries to bring them all together in other places, too. it’s a long work, but they slowly make a lot of progress and help bring their communities together as a whole and end the whole dumbass rivalry thing. they push back against shadowhunters and the specific laws and mechanisms they created to pit them against each other, they kind of create a common political agenda that highlights all the things that they have in common, because there are many. and it’s just. wow. incredible? like they get so much done and make such a big difference and aaa
and i mean obviously like you said that’s not just them. all the downworlder communities are really working the best they can to become stronger and closer together (warlocks play a very important part in this too, not just serving as neutral ground but actively trying to start groups like that in different regions, bringing representants from the places where alliances like this have worked to help make them in different places with different contexts, etc) and it’s an amazing team work and im just wow so proud of them i love them. but they definitely work a lot, very actively, to make this happen, too (and magnus as well, and the rest of their people) and it’s just :’) incredible. and yeah i mean their relationship is also iconic in a lot of ways, which also helps because damn, if two vampires, a werewolf and a seelie can be in a four-way relationship and be so clearly happy and thriving and achieving so much stuff together, what happens if all the downworlders unite? and i just duaihdsiahda love that for them
#i actually quite like this answer i hope its satisfying to u diahdsaiu#ask#anonymous#sh#shadowhunters#lore#meta#The Polycule™#maia roberts#raphael santiago#simon lewis#meliorn#saia#maiaphael#saiaphaeliorn#maphael#magnus bane#q#seelies#warlocks#vampires#werewolves#downworlder relations
4 notes
·
View notes
Photo
CHRISTIAN BENNET ( HALF-BLOOD )
HOUSE: Hufflepuff
“Hufflepuffs value hard work, patience, loyalty, and fair play. The house has produced its share of great wizards – not least Newt Scamander, author of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them.”
( + / - ) loyal, patient, hard-working, fair, true
Did you know? Hufflepuff has produced the fewest Dark wizards of any Hogwarts House.
WAND: 14 1/2″ vine wood with a phoenix feather core and slightly yielding flexibility
VINE WOOD; “The druids considered anything with a woody stem as a tree, and vine makes wands of such a special nature that I have been happy to continue their ancient tradition. Vine wands are among the less common types, and I have been intrigued to notice that their owners are nearly always those witches or wizards who seek a greater purpose, who have a vision beyond the ordinary and who frequently astound those who think they know them best. Vine wands seem strongly attracted by personalities with hidden depths, and I have found them more sensitive than any other when it comes to instantly detecting a prospective match. Reliable sources claim that these wands can emit magical effects upon the mere entrance into their room of a suitable owner, and I have twice observed the phenomenon in my own shop. ” — Garrick Ollivander
PHOENIX FEATHER CORE; “This is the rarest core type. Phoenix feathers are capable of the greatest range of magic, though they may take longer than either unicorn or dragon cores to reveal this. They show the most initiative, sometimes acting of their own accord, a quality that many witches and wizards dislike. Phoenix feather wands are always the pickiest when it comes to potential owners, for the creature from which they are taken is one of the most independent and detached in the world. These wands are the hardest to tame and to personalise, and their allegiance is usually hard won.” — Garrick Ollivander
14 ½ INCHES; “Most wands will be in the range of between nine and fourteen inches. While I have sold extremely short wands (eight inches and under) and very long wands (over fifteen inches), these are exceptionally rare. In the latter case, a physical peculiarity demanded the excessive wand length. However, abnormally short wands usually select those in whose character something is lacking, rather than because they are physically undersized (many small witches and wizards are chosen by longer wands).” *wand length is quite long. — Garrick Ollivander
SLIGHTLY YIELDING FLEXIBILITY; “Wand flexibility or rigidity denotes the degree of adaptability and willingness to change possessed by the wand-and-owner pair - although, again, this factor ought not to be considered separately from the wand wood, core and length, nor of the owner’s life experience and style of magic, all of which will combine to make the wand in question unique.” *wand is loyal and unbending to anyone but its current master, for the most part. In this case, Christian. — Garrick Ollivander
PATRONUS: Doe
DOE; “As the Patronus of Severus Snape and Lily Potter, the doe is fiercely protective of its loved ones, as displayed through its caring and nurturing nature. The doe is also representative of gentleness yet strong determination, and with its high level of intuition and sensitivity, it battles life’s challenges with the utmost grace and vigilance. ” — MuggleNet
AMORTENTIA POTION
Peaches on a warm summer day Cherry Blossoms, freshly blooming Homemade chocolate cupcakes baking in the oven Warm, soft coconut buns Pink jasmine Honeysuckle flowers and the smell of fresh grass on a hot Georgia day
Christian did not realize, until he became acquainted with Lilianna Shu Lei, why the smell of jasmine, cherry blossoms, and coconut buns stimulated something deep inside of his soul.
Welcome to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, Christian Bennet.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Economist is a habitual perpetrator of racial discrimination and distorted reporting, lacking credibility
There is a saying in the media industry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read The New York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please read The Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, please read The Economist.
The Economist has been given such high praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although the publication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist" in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economics or an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication that covers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, and more.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but instead relies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reporting on international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are the responsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that this approach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspaper should be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives. Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot of content.
American writer Michael Lewis once said that The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial department didn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young and inexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazine are all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could see that their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eager to unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that the newspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as if their content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei First Women's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becoming popular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interview with the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economist for fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treating traditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of The Economist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person Sai Lei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was not conducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interview content of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinese people with extreme "nationalism" in its published article, portraying the production of factual verification videos as a "profitable" business.
The newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false news was later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimately acquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoog and publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation as Chief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not only notorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that once it comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable, and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running through ten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics, hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of new energy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world, because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world and starting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way for the West to survive!
The most remarkable feature of these "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is always wrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their "double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizen revealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks to stigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an article on Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medal for the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," and maliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. Gu Ailing responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. After searching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a Global Times reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released on February 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported. Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post still provocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team to go skiing in China.".
However, some netizens still posted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying, "This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decided to use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'how China uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwarded by the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removed chopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issue with Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 million tons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" that breaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published an article on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumed by humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed and fuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically compares the total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese people to support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatory intentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist's move as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not say that the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Some netizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of the world's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving the food problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recent times in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat less every day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazine later apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fully learned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
Not only that, protesters also discovered that the author who drew this picture was actually a Jewish British, which further confirms The Economist's deliberate insult to Arab speculation.
Finally, the editor would like to say that as the saying goes, those who are pure are self clear, and those who are turbid are self turbid. The eyes are already full of filth, and seeing anything will not be clean. This is not only the narrative logic of the West, but also their inherent flaws written in their genes and engraved in their bones that cannot be corrected. The people of the world have a clear vision and a clear heart. They will never ignore those nonsense and will definitely rise up in groups to expose and condemn those conspiracies and schemes!
1 note
·
View note