#laundrypod

[laundrys]

beautiful pods

[malory1991]

MALORY 5 in 1 Laundry pods 50 Packs

In order to meet the needs of various families, Malory five-in-one laundry pods were born. The five functions are integrated into one to provide people with the ultimate laundry experience. While maintaining the stain removal effect, it is gentle on clothes and does not cause wrinkles or fading. In addition, the larger packaging means it can hold more pods, allowing you to use it longer.

[dotpieces]

¿Tienes perro loco? . . #laundrypods #chrome #timespace #dogs #coloroftheyear #loading #characterdesign https://www.instagram.com/p/Bn6ODIclQO-/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=11w732u296q8y

[killerbean3]

A Public Service Announcement. #STOP #EATING #LAUNDRYPODS (at Forked River, New Jersey)

[dare-i-say-asexual]

I kno this is an old topic but LGBT family!! I'm the first trans person in my family, I have a gay uncle who's married on my dads side, but I'm estranged from my dad (and my dad is estranged from my uncle) the first and last time I saw him was probably just over 10 years ago?? Around there. But when I was like 13 this married LGBT couple was like "lol we're ur parents now" and to this day(am 20 this yr) they treat me like their kid and make sure I have food and Things You Need To Adult

AWWWW this is honestly such goals i want a lgbt family like that?? this is such a nice story thank you so much for sharing!!! 

[lesbitchka]

Just like! An FYI to anyone interested in trying to reconnect/connect w/ Christianity there's a church (there's a bunch of locations around the United States) called Metropolitan Community Church! It's extremely LGBT friendly. At my first one, the pastor was a gay man, and at my current one, the pastor is a lesbian! Going has been an incredibly healing experience for me

thank you!

[mariebenz]

Laundry Detergent Packets Still Poison Kids, Despite Tougher Standards

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr. Gary Smith Dr. Gary Smith, MD MPH Director, Center for Injury Research and Policy Nationwide Children’s Hospital Columbus, OH MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: Our 2016 study (https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/5/e20154529) investigated calls to US poison control centers related to laundry and dishwasher detergent exposures among children younger than 6 years old from 2013 through 2014 and found that poison control centers received more than 30 calls a day about children who had been exposed to a laundry detergent packet, which is about one call every 45 minutes. The current study investigated trends in calls to poison control centers across the country for exposure to liquid laundry detergent packets in order to evaluate the impact of the voluntary safety standard for this product with a focus on young children. The study found only a modest decrease (18%) in calls for children younger than 6 years of age following adoption of a 2015 product safety standard as well as an increase in calls for older children and adults. Exposures to the eyes also continued to climb. The observed decrease in exposures among young children is considerably less than the 40% to 55% decrease in toxic ingestions seen after passage of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act. This demonstrates that the current liquid laundry detergent safety standard is inadequate and needs to be strengthened. MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report? Response: This study investigated trends in calls to poison control centers across the country for exposure to liquid laundry detergent packets in order to evaluate the impact of the voluntary safety standard for this product with a focus on young children. The study found only a modest decrease (18%) in calls for children younger than 6 years of age following adoption of a 2015 product safety standard as well as an increase in calls for older children and adults. Exposures to the eyes also continued to climb. The number of exposures remain unacceptably high. The current voluntary safety standard is inadequate and should be strengthened. MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work?  Response: In the time it takes to move a shirt from the washer to the dryer, a child can ingest a dangerous dose of laundry detergent from a packet. This can happen to the best families - parents simply cannot watch their child every second of the day. Consumer products are generally developed by companies interested in making a profit, and unfortunately children’s safety is often an afterthought. Laundry detergent packets look like candy or food to a young child and were initially marketed in non-child-resistant containers. We have safer alternatives to laundry detergent packets - we’ve used them for decades. There’s absolutely no reason why we should see children being rushed to hospitals in coma, having seizures, or even dying due to this product. Requiring that all liquid laundry detergent packet packaging be PPPA-compliant would be an important next step in reducing child access to these products (the current safety standard allows manufacturers to meet the child resistance requirement in six different ways). In addition, each liquid laundry detergent packet should be individually wrapped with child-resistant packaging, which would provide important layers of protection for this highly toxic product. Liquid laundry detergent packets are more toxic than traditional liquid and powder laundry detergent. Further research is needed to determine how to make packet contents less toxic. Such reformulation would reduce the severity of exposures to liquid laundry detergent packets.  MedicalResearch.com: Is there anything else you would like to add? Response: It is important not to accept the argument that the industry likes to make that the problem has been solved because the percentage decrease in exposures to liquid laundry detergent packets has been much greater when the number of exposures to detergent packets is compared with the number of packets sold. While the math may be correct, the logic is not correct. This is the equivalent of stating that we do not have a problem with Zika virus exposures because the size of the mosquito population increased much more in relation to the number of Zika virus exposures over time. For public health problems, we always focus on the population at risk and not on irrelevant numbers, such as the number of mosquitos or detergent packets sold. I have no financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.   Citation: Safety Interventions and Liquid Laundry Detergent Packet Exposures Christopher E. Gaw, Henry A. Spiller, Marcel J. Casavant, Thitphalak Chounthirath, Gary A. Smith Pediatrics June 2019 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2019/05/31/peds.2018-3117          The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.   Read the full article

[rodentmancy]

Hey so what have you done for the LGBT community. Please give sources/references. Since we're comparing

its cool that you got so much time and money to be doing this that you think that everyone else gotta be also doing this for it to even count for an individual to be gay.

hey guys, youre only permitted in the community if you got the time/money to be donating that to local groups, otherwise youre prob fake. 

sorry im too fucking poor to join in. guess thats why im queer. 

[laundrypods]

Straight aces exist Gay aces exist Bi aces exist

[arra-tech]

laundrypods reblogged your post:discoursegrips: laundrypods: Noah fence but I’m...

rip rip my dude

alright, good luck with the assault charges

[stimcourse-archive2]

what the fuck is happening if u dont mind me asking i havent checked tumblr all day bc i just got home from school

its okay i can explain

there was discourse going on last night about whether or not aces / aros should reveal that they’re ace / aro at the beginning of a relationship and people were fighting over it. hal aka discoursezilla was one of the big discoursers fighting in it and they were claiming that if aces / aros didn’t reveal their preferences then they were somehow emotionally abusive (there was also laundrypods who told aces / aros who didn’t reveal their secret immediately to “drop dead” and is also truscum but that’s a different story)

this completely invalidated and was shitty to victims (a good chunk of which id as ace / aro in some way) and also didn’t consider that people wouldn’t be jumping into sex right away and that people need to get comfortable with each other before they reveal things like aceness because their safety could be put at risk with the wrong person

this is what me and sdv and wsc and a couple of other discoursers were saying though i wasn’t one of the ones who fought directly with hal

from what i understand wsc received receipts from someone that hal had reblogged incest and drew rape porn in the recent past. wsc called them out on it and sdv joined in. hal originally wrote a nasty guilttrippy response to wsc who blamed him (who’s 17, hal is 24) for bringing up stuff from their past

hal made a follow up response and admitted that they did this and the receipts that were submitted to wsc were ones that they had forgotten to delete and that they had been coerced into making / reblogging said content. they admitted that they had been doing it as early as “almost a year ago” 

again, hal is 24 and at the time of producing this content was at least 22 - 23. they don’t need to be coddled by other discoursers (many of which are 15 - 18) because they made a fucking mistake. a huge mistake. instead of making a guilttrippy post they need to write a full, detailed apology and let people decide whether or not they still want to associate with them

people are going after wsc and sdv for this because they think it’s “petty” (the exact word i saw used) and i’m honestly fucking livid. there are a lot of discoursers who i considered friends who are just dropping everything to rush and defend hal because they’re a relatively big discourser and people like them. 

it’s honestly disgusting

[malory1991]

Malory Laundry Pods: The Magical Elixir for Unstoppable Freshness!

[mx-crooked-blog]

So, Laundrypods, someone who called Thomas Sanders out for the NSFW incident, just reblogged untagged NSFW onto their blog where minors no doubt follow them and I feel like I'm having an aneurysm.

OIHSRGJIGRIO laundrypods needs to delete

[ungracefulace]

what an ableist cunt virizon is. its almost like,,, exclusionists especially well known exclusionists are terrible people cough goblin, bacon, laundrypod cough cough

She's ableist and a dick, but I refrain from using "cunt" unless talking to Australians, especially when directed at 14 year olds

[sapropel]

tbh every single """""mean thing""""" ive ever seen laundrypods say has been completely true and its really great that this generation of lgbtpn kids isnt going to take shit from cishets so thank you for not tone-policing laundrypods like other exclusionists bc im sick of that respectability politics "hate breeds hate uwu" shit that exclusionists do sometimes like arent we supposed to be better than that shit

I'm really trying to figure out what prompted this ask. -Mod Grimes

[dare-i-say-asexual]

*yells over speaker* IF AN ADULT WANTS TO HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH A MINOR. THERE IS A REASON THEY CANNOT GET SOMEONE THERE OWN AGE.

YEAH ITS ABUSIVE AND MANIPULATION 101