#krishna janmabhoomi masjid case

[janaknandini-singh999]

I'm asking this in good faith

Im not able to understand the entire Krishna Janmabhoomi issue.

I read that there was a petition that said that the current birthplace that's put is not the "original one". Do you have any sources we can read about what is the actual birthplace? Idk this entire case seems more like a political motive for me? And with what I've read, the Eidgah was constructed on the sabha dwaar and not the site which is the birthplace??

Hey I'm sorry but I'm afraid idk much about it either 😭 though from what I can gather it's pretty much the same thing as the issue with what Ram Mandir and Babri masjid was. Do pry into the relevant articles, historical excerpts etc and let me know as well what you find out 🙏

[angel0news]

BJP's 'Bal Buddhi' Re-Plug On Rahul Gandhi's Ram Janmabhoomi Movement Claim

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's remarks on the Ram Janmabhoomi movement led by BJP veteran Lal Krishna Advani has drawn a sharp response, with the BJP doubling down on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's "childish mind" jab at Mr Gandhi.

BJP veteran and Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan described Rahul Gandhi as "bal buddhi" (childish) and accused him of "spreading confusion and lies".

"Rahul Gandhi is a childish person who has not matured yet. He has not yet become the Leader of the Opposition properly. He says we (INDIA bloc) defeated the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. Rahul ji, Ram is our existence, our ideal, our life, our God, and Ram is the identity of India," Mr Chouhan told reporters.

Referring to the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, he said, "This movement has thrown the Congress out of power many times and paved the way for the construction of a divine and grand temple, but Rahul Gandhi only lies."

Mr Chouhan also accused Mr Gandhi of lying in Parliament about Agniveer martyrs and the government of not providing a Minimum Support Price.

"He (Rahul) knows nothing else other than lying and spreading confusion. That is why this 'Bal Buddhi' person Rahul Gandhi keeps saying anything that comes to his mind. No one understands how he was able to defeat the (Ram Mandir) movement.

"Just saying whatever comes to mind has become the tendency of the Congress. Under his (Rahul Gandhi) leadership, the Congress will invite only misfortune," he added.

BJP leaders have been infantilising Mr Gandhi and saying he has a "childish mind" after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's "balak buddhi" jab at the Congress MP, now Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha.

The remarks in question were made by the Congress leader during his visit to Ahmedabad. He was speaking about the Faizabad Lok Sabha seat -- of which Ayodhya is a part -- by Congress ally Samajwadi Party.

"By defeating the BJP in Ayodhya, INDIA bloc has defeated the Ram Mandir movement that was launched by the BJP veteran Lal Krishna Advani. What I am saying is something very big… Congress party and INDIA bloc defeated them in Ayodhya," Mr Gandhi said Saturday.

The Rath Yatra was launched by Mr Advani to shore up support for the construction of a temple at the site in Ayodhya believed to be the birthplace of Lord Ram. The yatra was taken out in 1990 and multiple communal clashes were reported along its route. Two years later, the 16th century Babri Masjid located at the Ayodhya site was demolished by Hindu activists who believed it was built on the ruins of an ancient temple to mark Ram's birthplace. Nearly three decades later, a Supreme Court ruling paved the way for a construction of a Ram Temple at the site.

With the BJP playing up the Ram temple construction in its election campaign, the Faizabad election was keenly watched, and the BJP's defeat there was a key talking point on result day.

While speaking in Ahmedabad, Mr Gandhi also claimed that the BJP would be defeated in its stronghold Gujarat in the 2027 state polls. "Together we are going to defeat them in Gujarat. We will defeat Narendra Modi and BJP in Gujarat just like we defeated them in Ayodhya," Mr Gandhi said.

This would be quite a task because in the 2022 election, the BJP swept the state, winning 156 of the 182 Assembly seats and the Congress managed just 17.

Mr Gandhi's remarks also drew the criticism of Chirag Paswan, Union Minister and leader of BJP's ally Lok Janshakti Party (Ramvilas).

Responding to the Congress leader's remarks, he said, "First up of all, Rahul Gandhi should learn it is Faizabad Lok Sabha, not Ayodhya. Ayodhya is a Vidhan Sabha constituency and is part of it. In such cases, if they think Ayodhya's win is big for them, then we are also analysing our mistakes and working towards it. They couldn't even cross the mark of 100+ seats in Lok Sabha and are claiming big things, I think their pride won't stay for long. In upcoming days, there are elections in various states, the results will show how strong NDA is."

[lok-shakti]

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान-ईदगाह मामला : मथुरा के सिविल जज सीनियर डिवीजन की अदालत में आठ मामलों पर सुनवाई आज

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान-ईदगाह मामला : मथुरा के सिविल जज सीनियर डिवीजन की अदालत में आठ मामलों पर सुनवाई आज

ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें मथुरा के श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान और शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद के मामले में शुक्रवार को सिविल जज सीनियर डिवीजन की अदालत में अलग-अलग पक्षकारों के आठ मामलों पर सुनवाई होगी। सुनवाई होने वाले केसों में मुख्य रूप से रंजना अग्निहोत्री, राजेंद्र माहेश्वरी व महेंद्र प्रताप सिंह के केस शामिल हैं। श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान और शाही ईदगाह प्रकरण में विभिन्न पक्षकारों ने श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान की 13.37 एकड़…

[frontnews]

Krishna Janmabhoomi Mathura Petitioner Is Being Threatened With Death

Krishna Janmabhoomi Mathura Petitioner Is Being Threatened With Death

Krishna Janmabhoomi Mathura: Mahendra Pratap Singh, the petitioner in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah mosque dispute, allegedly received death threats from Mohammad Jahid Qureshi, the president of the Jama Masjid Intezamia committee in Agra. Jahid Qureshi made the threats in a viral audio clip. As per reports, a case has been registered against him at Mantola police station under Indian Penal…

[rickztalk]

Krishna Janmabhoomi case: Mathura court orders Gyanvapi Masjid-like survey of Shahi Idgah mosque | India News

Krishna Janmabhoomi case: Mathura court orders Gyanvapi Masjid-like survey of Shahi Idgah mosque | India News

Mathura (Uttar Pradesh): Mathura local court on Saturday passed an order in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah case to survey the disputed site. The Court of Senior Division, while hearing the petition of Hindu Sena, issued an order to survey the disputed site. Issuing notices to all the parties, saying they have been asked to comply with the court`s order. The survey report is to be presented…

[mzemo0]

The Case Of The Gyanvapi Mosque Explained

The Gyanvapi mosque complex is embroiled in a conflict that has yet again fuelled communal tensions in India. On Monday, September 12, the Varanasi District and Sessions Court rejected The Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee’s appeal evoking the 1991 Places of Worship Act against the civil petition filed by a group of five Hindu women.

This civil petition by these women sought permission to worship Hindu deities inside the grounds of the Gyanvapi mosque complex. The “Anjuman Intezamia Masajid” is the Muslim committee that manages the Gyanvapi mosque complex.

Brief History of the Gyanvapi Mosque Conflict

The Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Mosque conflict began last year. In August 2021 a case was first registered and presented to the local court by five Hindu women. Then, in April 2022 the district court in Varanasi appointed an advocate commissioner namely Ajay Kumar Mishra to this case. In the same month, an important announcement was made by a civil court that affected the Hindu-Muslim tensions significantly. The announcement was a verdict that ordered the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) that inspection be done in the mosque. This inspection demanded a video survey of the Gyanvapi mosque be done.

One significant development happened on May 19 when this video survey was apparently “leaked” by the Hindu group. The controversial video apparently revealed a stone shaft that allegedly is a symbol of a Hindu deity, inside the mosque. However, even this claim has been refuted by many people. After that, the court sealed off a portion of the mosque without allowing the Intizamia committee to argue their case.

The Hindu group claimed the presence of a “shivling”, the holy Hindu artifact, inside the mosque. Simultaneously, after a petition by the Anjuman Iztizamiya Masajid, the supreme court was also looking into this case. The petition by the Intizamiya committee sought the intervention of the supreme court. The committee doubted the nature of the investigation being carried out by the district and civil court. The committee questioned the very basis of the petition.

The supreme court at that point in time didn’t comment much on the presence of a shivling inside the mosque. However, it did order that security is provided to the Indian Muslims worshippers in the Gyanvapi mosque. At the same time, the supreme court also said that the district court may continue to address this issue. The case will now be heard on September 22.

Historical claims at the Gyanvapi Mosque Complex

Many Hindu petitioners claim that the Gyanvapi Mosque was made after Muslims demolished the historic Hindu temple Kashi Vishwanath. They also claim that it was under the orders of the Muslim Mughal emperor Aurangzeb that the temple was razed. Many Hindus still ascertain that the mosque is still the original sacred site of Hindu worship.

Along with the Ram Janmabhoomi Temple- Babri Masjid site in Ayodhya, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s Ram Temple movement also sought to “liberate” the Kashi-Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Mosque site and the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura. The Gyanvapi mosque is one of the three mosques that make up some catchphrases of the Hindutva. One of the popular ones is “Ayodhya toh jhaanki hai, Kashi-Mathura baaki hai,“. The BJP and other Hindutva organizations in the 1980s popularised this slogan. The slogan reads, “Ayodhya is just a trailer; Kashi and Mathura are next.”

The Intizamiya Committee approached the court claiming the nature of the petition of the Hindu group is in itself questionable. The mosque’s management committee claimed that the mosque next was Waqf property. What serves as the foundation for the defense of the Muslim committee is the Places of Worship Act of 1991.

Places of Worship Act of 1991

The long title describes it as “An Act to prohibit conversion of any place of worship and to provide for the maintenance of the religious character of any place of worship as it existed on the 15th day of August 1947, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.”

A place of worship belonging to any religious tradition cannot be converted entirely—or even partially—into a place of worship belonging to another tradition, or even into a different branch of the same tradition, as stated in Section 3 of the Act.

According to Section 4(1), a place of worship “must continue to have the same character as it was on August 15, 1947” in terms of its religious affiliation.

As per Section 4(2), any lawsuit or legal action related to the conversion of a place of worship that existed on August 15, 1947, and was pending before any court, shall be dropped, and no new lawsuit or legal action shall be brought.

Section 5 states that the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case and any related lawsuit, appeal, or action are exempt from the Act’s application. Islamophobia

The Ram Temple movement was at its height when the then Prime Minister PV Narsimha Rao introduced the Places of Worship Act. L. K. Advani’s rath yatra had increased communal tensions even before the extremist Hindutva mobs demolished the mosque. Attempting to avoid any further communal violence, the congress government passed the bill in the parliament.  

What did the Courts say about the Places of Worship Act in its Varanasi judgment?

District Judge A K Vishvesha noted in his ruling that one of the defendant’s “principal contentions” was that the plaintiff’s lawsuit was barred under Section 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. The judgment did note that the plaintiffs claimed that “they were worshiping…at the disputed spot ceaselessly from a long time till 1993”. After 1993, they were only permitted to worship the aforementioned deities once a year under Uttar Pradesh’s regulated administration. Thus, according to the plaintiffs, they continued to frequently worship at the contested location even after 15 August 1947. “Therefore, The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, does not operate as a bar on the suit of plaintiffs, and the suit is not barred by…the Act”.

The constitutional validity of the 1991 Act was not under challenge. Nor had it been examined before the Supreme Court Bench that heard the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit. Even so, the court, while disagreeing with certain conclusions drawn by the Allahabad High Court, about the act made specific observations in its support.

Hindus and Muslims have prayed side by side in Varanasi. The heavily guarded structure serves as a reminder of this sight’s tense past. It is also a reminder of communal disputes and unrest in India. A country where Hindus make up the majority and Muslims constitute the largest religious minority.

[squarwell-breakingnews]

Times Top10: Today's Top News Headlines and Latest News from India & across the World | Times of India

Times Top10: Today’s Top News Headlines and Latest News from India & across the World | Times of India

5 THINGS FIRST Commonwealth Games 2022 ends; Parliament session; Delhi High Court to hear Umar Khalid’s bail plea in Delhi violence case; Mathura court hearing on maintainability of suit in Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Masjid dispute; UNSC to discuss Israel’s airstrikes on Gaza 1. Super Sunday for India at CWG 2022 Medal rush: On the 10th day of the CWG 2022, three boxers — Nikhat Zareen, Amit…

[mriduldasgupta]

Babri Masjid Demolition Case: All 32 accused with LK Advani in Babri Masjid Demolition Case handed down today || Latest today news ||

LK Advani opens his mouth as soon as the stigma of Babri destruction is erased

I sincerely welcome the verdict in the Babri Masjid demolition case. This verdict establishes my personal and BJP beliefs and commitment to the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. Veteran BJP leader LK Advani made the remarks after the verdict of Babri Masjid was announced in a special CBI court in Lucknow today. Court's Judgement

CBI announces verdict of Babri Masjid in special court Judge Surendra Kumar Yadav today pronounced the verdict of Babri Masjid in the CBI special court in Lucknow after a long 27 years. Lal Krishna Advani, Uma Bharati, Murli Manohar Joshi and 32 other accused were acquitted. The verdict was handed down due to lack of sufficient evidence.

Murli Manohar statement

Murli Manohar Joshi is also happy with the verdict Welcoming the verdict, one reaction after another started coming from the BJP. Rajnath Singh wrote on Twitter, '32 accused have been acquitted. This proves that justice has been done no matter how late. ' One of the accused Murli Manohar Joshi is also happy with the verdict.

What did Yogi say?

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath also reacted to the case. Attacking the Congress, he said, "It proves that the then Congress government hanged Sadhus, BJP leaders and Vishwa Hindu Parishad officials in bogus cases." Only for vote bank politics. Those responsible for this conspiracy should apologize to the nation.

What did Pradeep Bhattacharya say, Congress leader?

Congress  leaderPradeep Bhattacharya said the verdict was expected. I thought such a verdict would come. This verdict will hurt the secular image of the country. "I will tell the BJP opposition parties to unite against those who want to mark India as a country of a particular religion by sacrificing the unity of India," he said.

What did Sujan Chakraborty Say, CPIM leader?

CPIM leader Sujan Chakraborty said that what is happening in Modi-Shah's reign is happening. Modi-Shah is getting away without themselves. As a result, the rest will get rid of it. It is becoming clear that the verdict is coming out in the way that the government wants. The country's head is bowing in shame. Jyoti Basu commented on the incident as a barbaric party.

Also Read: US presendential Election Debate: Trump Under pressure from debate with Biden. Pointed on Trump and Modi's friendship.

What did Sougata Roy Say, Trinamool leader?

Trinamool leader Saugat Roy also said that he thought this would be the verdict. After 27 years, the secular image of India was tarnished by acquitting the accused in Raidan. The verdict shattered India's fundamental unity. Justice did not match. The Muslim Law Board will surely go to the higher court against this verdict. It is hard to believe that mistakes have been made. Which is in favor of the ruling party at the center.

Also Read: Mamta Banerjee: Don't Neglect Corona Due to Covid-19, Mamta Banerjee announced, Latest news

[bbcbreakingnews]

Bhoomi poojan: Mandir stir leaders to be invited

AYODHYA: Frontline leaders of the Ram Janmabhoomi agitation will be invited during the “bhoomi pujan” for the construction of the Ayodhya temple next month. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to visit Ayodhya on August 5 for the ceremony. Kameshwar Chaupal, a member of Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra, a trust set up by the Centre to oversee the construction of the temple, said they will invite former deputy PM LK Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti and Vinay Katiyar. Currently, the BJP leaders are facing a trial in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The trust has kept it in mind that former deputy Prime Minister Lal Krishna Advani, along with other leaders, took the Ram Mandir movement to the masses, Chaupal said, adding that the list of invitees is being finalised. According to the trust sources, home minister Amit Shah, defence minister Rajnath Singh, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, Maharashtra chief minister Udhav Thackeray and Bihar CM Nitish Kumar are also on the list of invitees.

The post Bhoomi poojan: Mandir stir leaders to be invited appeared first on BBC BREAKING NEWS.

from WordPress https://bbcbreakingnews.com/bhoomi-poojan-mandir-stir-leaders-to-be-invited/

[buzz-london]

New Case For Mathura Mandir - 29th Sept 2020

A new petition has been filed in a Mathura court seeking the ownership over the entire of Krishna Janmabhoomi Mandir land in Mathura and the removal of Shahi Idgah Masjid. 

Secularism is in danger once again because of Hindutva forces. In this episode, we discuss the pros and cons of reclaiming the Kashi and Mathura temples. I give my opinion on it and also discuss the need for mutual understanding and truth and reconciliation between the Hindu and Muslim communities to truly heal old wounds and move forward.

https://youtu.be/NdS9ANO_EJU

[lok-shakti]

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान मामला : महेंद्र प्रताप सिंह के प्रार्थना पत्र पर नहीं हो सकी सुनवाई, मस्जिद का सर्वे कराने की है मांग

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान मामला : महेंद्र प्रताप सिंह के प्रार्थना पत्र पर नहीं हो सकी सुनवाई, मस्जिद का सर्वे कराने की है मांग

ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें मथुरा में श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान ईदगाह प्रकरण में पक्षकार की आपत्तियों पर ईदगाह पक्ष अपना जवाब प्रस्तुत नहीं कर सका। विगत 7 जुलाई को केस के पक्षकारगण एडवोकेट महेंद्र प्रताप सिंह व राजेंद्र माहेश्वरी ने 7 रूल 11 सीपीसी (केस के स्थायित्व से संबंधित धारा) पर अपनी आपत्ति दाखिल की थी। अदालत ने विपक्षी ईदगाह पक्ष को पक्षकार की आपत्तियों का अवलोकन कर जवाब देने का अवसर दिया था। बार…

[massivelyspeedyobject]

‘’The demolition of Babri Mosjid’’1992

The Snapshot of Babri Mosjid demolition :

1.       People climb atop Babri Masjid the day it was demolished in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh on December 06, 1992. The Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case has been going on for a quarter of a century but the dispute itself is over a century old. On the eve of the 25th anniversary of the demolition, the Supreme Court said it will hear appeals regarding the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute in February 2018. The belief is that the birthplace of Lord Rama is located under the mosque’s central dome. ( HT Photo)

2.       Muslims demonstrators at India Gate rallying for Babri Masjid on March 30, 1987. While the case took centre stage after the demolition in 1992, disputes over the ownership of the land date back to 18th century with the first incident of violence over the holy site recorded in 1853. The epic court dispute began when Mahant Raghubir Das, a Hindu priest, filed the first court case and sought permission to build a canopy on the Ramchabutra. (HT Photo)

Hindu groups formed a committee in 1984 to lead the construction of a Ram temple at the Janmabhoomi site and the movement gathered momentum under BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani. In 1989, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) laid the foundation of a Ram temple on the land next to the Babri Masjid. ( HT Photo)

3.       (L to R) BJP leaders LK Advani, AB Vajpayee and Murli Manohar Joshi seen at a party National Executive Committee meeting. BJP president Lal Krishna Advani in 1990 went on a Somnath-to-Ayodhya Rath Yatra to ‘educate people’ about the movement to build a temple at the disputed site. In 1991, BJP became the country’s primary opposition party and came to power in Uttar Pradesh. The momentum for the temple movement increased as kar sevaks (volunteers) poured into Ayodhya. (HT Photo)

4.       As BJP gained momentum with its Rath Yatra, thousands of kar sevaks gathered in Ayodhya. The mosque was partially damaged in 1990 and at least 30 were killed in police firing. The state government, under Mulayam Singh Yadav, swore protection and promised a complete lockdown of the site and city. (HT Photo)

5.       A politically charged crowd after speeches by LK Advani, Murli Manohor Joshi and Uma Bharti stormed the Babri Masjid and razed it to the ground, sparking anti-communal riots across India in which an estimated 2000 people were killed. (Sanjay Sharma / HT Photo)

6.       In the immediate fallout, then Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao’s government dismissed BJP govts in UP, MP, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh. Ten days after the mosque was demolished, Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao set up a commission of inquiry under retired judge Justice MS Liberhan. (HT Photo)

7.        the Babri Masjid demolition case ordered framing of charges against 49 accused, including senior BJP leaders Lal Krishna Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and Kalyan Singh (pictured above) in September 1997. (Ajay Aggarwal / HT Photo

8.       In 2002, under pressure from VHP, the Centre filed an application in the Supreme Court for vacating the ‘interim order’ banning any religious activity in Ayodhya. On February 6, 2002 at least 59 people were killed when a train in Godhra, Gujarat carrying kar sevaks from Ayodhya was attacked. As a result, riots erupted across Gujarat in which over 1,000 people were killed. (AP)

9.       After the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court began hearings to determine who owns the Ayodhya site, Prime Minister AB Vajpayee set up an Ayodhya cell to hold talks with Hindu and Muslim leaders. (Pradeep Bhatia / HT Photo)

10.    After a series of events following the Allahabad High Court verdict of a three-way division of the disputed land and its subsequent failure, the top court called for an amicable settlement over who owns the site. On the eve of 25th anniversary of the demolition the SC decided to hear civil appeals filed by various parties challenging the 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute on February 8 next year. ( HT Photo)

11.    We have to wait yet for the final verdict……

[lok-shakti]

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान मामला : मथुरा की अदालत में शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद के सर्वे संबंधी मामले पर सुनवाई आज

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान मामला : मथुरा की अदालत में शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद के सर्वे संबंधी मामले पर सुनवाई आज

ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें मथुरा के सिविल जज सीनियर डिवीजन की अदालत में सोमवार को श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान और शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद मामले में एडवोकेट महेंद्र प्रताप सिंह, एडवोकेट राजेंद्र माहेश्वरी और नारा��णी सेना के राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष मनीष यादव के केसों पर सुनवाई होगी। तीनों लोग श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान केस के पक्षकार हैं।   ठाकुर केशवदेव की ओर से दर्ज अधिवक्ताओं के वाद में प्रतिवादी शाही ईदगाह और सुन्नी वक्फ बोर्ड…

[lok-shakti]

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मभूमि-ईदगाह प्रकरण: पक्षकारों का दावा सुनने योग्य है या नहीं, कोर्ट में सात जुलाई को होगी सुनवाई

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मभूमि-ईदगाह प्रकरण: पक्षकारों का दावा सुनने योग्य है या नहीं, कोर्ट में सात जुलाई को होगी सुनवाई

ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें श्रीकृष्ण जन्मभूमि और शाही ईदगाह प्रकरण में पक्षकार एडवोकेट महेंद्र प्रताप और राजेंद्र माहेश्वरी के दावे के स्थायित्व के बिंदु पर अदालत पहले सुनवाई करेगी। इसके लिए सात जुलाई की तारीख तय की है। इसके बाद अदालत शाही ईदगाह के कोर्ट कमीशन के मुद्दे पर सुनवाई करेगी। बता दें कि पक्षकारों ने अदालत से पहले कोर्ट कमीशन के मुद्दे पर सुनवाई के लिए प्रार्थना पत्र दिया था, लेकिन शाही…

[lok-shakti]

Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi case: मथुरा की अदालत में आज एक साथ नौ वादों पर सुनवाई, सभी में मस्जिद हटाने की मांग

Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi case: मथुरा की अदालत में आज एक साथ नौ वादों पर सुनवाई, सभी में मस्जिद हटाने की मांग

ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें मथुरा की अदालत में शुक्रवार को श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान और शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद प्रकरण में एक साथ नौ वादों और करीब 15 प्रार्थना पत्रों पर सुनवाई होगी। श्रीकृष्ण विराजमान और ठाकुर केशवदेव के भक्त बनकर अदालत में ��ाचिका दाखिल करने वाले वादीगण सिविल जज सीनियर डिवीजन की अदालत में एक साथ सामने होंगे। सभी वादों में श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान की 13.37 एकड़ जमीन से कब्जा हटाने की मांग की गई…

[lok-shakti]

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान प्रकरण: मथुरा की अदालत में एक जुलाई को पक्षकार रंजना अग्निहोत्री के केस की होगी सुनवाई

श्रीकृष्ण जन्मस्थान प्रकरण: मथुरा की अदालत में एक जुलाई को पक्षकार रंजना अग्निहोत्री के केस की होगी सुनवाई

संवाद न्यूज एजेंसी, मथुरा Published by: मुकेश कुमार Updated Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:16 AM IST ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें सुप्रीम कोर्ट की अधिवक्ता रंजना अग्निहोत्री की ओर से श्रीकृष्ण विराजमान की भक्त बनकर दाखिल किए गए वाद की सुनवाई एक जुलाई से मथुरा के सिविल जज सीनियर डिवीजन की अदालत में शुरू होनी है। पक्षकार के मुताबिक उनके केस के कई महत्वपूर्ण बिंदुओं पर जिला जज की अदालत में सुनवाई हो चुकी है। अब सीधे…