#junior resident govt jobs
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
IGIMS Junior Resident Recruitment 2023 â Apply Online for 131 Vacancy
Name of the Post: IGIMS Junior Resident Offline Form 2023 Post Date: 09-11-2023 Total Vacancy: 131 Brief Information: Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS) has published notification for the recruitment of Junior Resident vacancy. Those Candidates who are interested in the vacancy details & completed all eligibility criteria can read the Notification & Apply.  Indira GandhiâŚ
View On WordPress
#IGIMS Junior Resident Recruitment 2023#igims junior resident recruitment 2023 admit card#igims junior resident recruitment 2023 apply online#igims junior resident recruitment 2023 notification#igims junior resident recruitment 2023 notification pdf#igims junior resident recruitment 2023 result#igims junior resident vacancy 2023#junior resident aiims salary#junior resident govt jobs#junior resident jobs in ahmedabad#junior resident salary in gujarat
1 note
¡
View note
Text
this article is so illuminating and shows why so many of us believe this is a genocide-- according to the own words of IDF soldiers and israeli govt and their actions. they are admitting repeatedly that they sometimes target civilian areas and civilians and cultural heritage sites intentionally, knowing hamas is not there, in a twisted attempt of turning creating civil pressure on hamas.
Compared to previous Israeli assaults on Gaza, the current war â which Israel has named âOperation Iron Swords,â and which began in the wake of the Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on October 7 â has seen the army significantly expand its bombing of targets that are not distinctly military in nature. These include private residences as well as public buildings, infrastructure, and high-rise blocks, which sources say the army defines as âpower targetsâ (âmatarot otzemâ). The bombing of power targets, according to intelligence sources who had first-hand experience with its application in Gaza in the past, is mainly intended to harm Palestinian civil society: to âcreate a shockâ that, among other things, will reverberate powerfully and âlead civilians to put pressure on Hamas,â as one source put it.
theyre literally intentionally terrorising and killing palestinian civilians hoping it will somehow cause palestinians to somehow do the job of getting hamas for israel. instead of actually just.......idk.......trying to get hamas.
Several of the sources, who spoke to +972 and Local Call on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that the Israeli army has files on the vast majority of potential targets in Gaza â including homes â which stipulate the number of civilians who are likely to be killed in an attack on a particular target. This number is calculated and known in advance to the armyâs intelligence units, who also know shortly before carrying out an attack roughly how many civilians are certain to be killed. In one case discussed by the sources, the Israeli military command knowingly approved the killing of hundreds of Palestinian civilians in an attempt to assassinate a single top Hamas military commander. âThe numbers increased from dozens of civilian deaths [permitted] as collateral damage as part of an attack on a senior official in previous operations, to hundreds of civilian deaths as collateral damage,â said one source. âNothing happens by accident,â said another source. âWhen a 3-year-old girl is killed in a home in Gaza, itâs because someone in the army decided it wasnât a big deal for her to be killed â that it was a price worth paying in order to hit [another] target. We are not Hamas. These are not random rockets. Everything is intentional. We know exactly how much collateral damage there is in every home.â
the usage of "we are not hamas" to say that they are intentionally choosing to kill civilians instead of doing so at random is.. insane. "we are not hamas" should be followed by being more humane, not.. "we decided killing hundreds of palestinian civilians is worth it to get 1 single hamas member!"
According to the sources, the increasing use of AI-based systems like Habsora allows the army to carry out strikes on residential homes where a single Hamas member lives on a massive scale, even those who are junior Hamas operatives. Yet testimonies of Palestinians in Gaza suggest that since October 7, the army has also attacked many private residences where there was no known or apparent member of Hamas or any other militant group residing. Such strikes, sources confirmed to +972 and Local Call, can knowingly kill entire families in the process.
so, unshockingly, they are sometimes killing everyone within a building over some potential 1 hamas member, and sometimes there isnt a singular hamas member known in that building. so it could just be purely civilians being killed.
Another source said that a senior intelligence officer told his officers after October 7 that the goal was to âkill as many Hamas operatives as possible,â for which the criteria around harming Palestinian civilians were significantly relaxed. As such, there are âcases in which we shell based on a wide cellular pinpointing of where the target is, killing civilians. This is often done to save time, instead of doing a little more work to get a more accurate pinpointing,â said the source.
so they can be more accurate and precise with their attacks, as should be obvious for a highly sophisticated military, but they decide its better to just kill thousands of civilians if it saves them time.
From the first moment after the October 7 attack, decisionmakers in Israel openly declared that the response would be of a completely different magnitude to previous military operations in Gaza, with the stated aim of totally eradicating Hamas. âThe emphasis is on damage and not on accuracy,â said IDF Spokesperson Daniel Hagari on Oct. 9. The army swiftly translated those declarations into actions.
The third is âpower targets,â which includes high-rises and residential towers in the heart of cities, and public buildings such as universities, banks, and government offices. The idea behind hitting such targets, say three intelligence sources who were involved in planning or conducting strikes on power targets in the past, is that a deliberate attack on Palestinian society will exert âcivil pressureâ on Hamas.
they are deliberately destroying palestinian culture and history and society, hoping it will somehow create more pressure on hamas. 0 regard for palestinians' well-beings and safety and existence and they keep saying this over & over again
The final category consists of âfamily homesâ or âoperativesâ homes.â The stated purpose of these attacks is to destroy private residences in order to assassinate a single resident suspected of being a Hamas or Islamic Jihad operative. However, in the current war, Palestinian testimonies assert that some of the families that were killed did not include any operatives from these organizations. In the early stages of the current war, the Israeli army appears to have given particular attention to the third and fourth categories of targets. According to statements on Oct. 11 by the IDF Spokesperson, during the first five days of fighting, half of the targets bombed â 1,329 out of a total 2,687 â were deemed power targets.
so half of their targets were specifically intended to terrorise palestinian civilians and weren't actually attacks on hamas.
âWe are asked to look for high-rise buildings with half a floor that can be attributed to Hamas,â said one source who took part in previous Israeli offensives in Gaza. âSometimes it is a militant groupâs spokespersonâs office, or a point where operatives meet. I understood that the floor is an excuse that allows the army to cause a lot of destruction in Gaza. That is what they told us. âIf they would tell the whole world that the [Islamic Jihad] offices on the 10th floor are not important as a target, but that its existence is a justification to bring down the entire high-rise with the aim of pressuring civilian families who live in it in order to put pressure on terrorist organizations, this would itself be seen as terrorism. So they do not say it,â the source added.
the goal of their destruction of residential buildings isn't even about getting a hamas member who may or may not be there, its terrorism against palestinians.
Various sources who served in IDF intelligence units said that at least until the current war, army protocols allowed for attacking power targets only when the buildings were empty of residents at the time of the strike. However, testimonies and videos from Gaza suggest that since October 7, some of these targets have been attacked without prior notice being given to their occupants, killing entire families as a result.
unshockingly its as palestinians in gaza have been saying: they get attacked with no warning and countless civilian deaths occur as a result.
According to the Israeli army, during the first five days of fighting it dropped 6,000 bombs on the Strip, with a total weight of about 4,000 tons. Media outlets reported that the army had wiped out entire neighborhoods; according to the Gaza-based Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, these attacks led to âthe complete destruction of residential neighborhoods, the destruction of infrastructure, and the mass killing of residents.â  As documented by Al Mezan and numerous images coming out of Gaza, Israel bombed the Islamic University of Gaza, the Palestinian Bar Association, a UN building for an educational program for outstanding students, a building belonging to the Palestine Telecommunications Company, the Ministry of National Economy, the Ministry of Culture, roads, and dozens of high-rise buildings and homes â especially in Gazaâs northern neighborhoods.
Yet despite the unbridled Israeli bombardment, the damage to Hamasâ military infrastructure in northern Gaza during the first days of the war appears to have been very minimal. Indeed, intelligence sources told +972 and Local Call that military targets that were part of power targets have previously been used many times as a fig leaf for harming the civilian population. âHamas is everywhere in Gaza; there is no building that does not have something of Hamas in it, so if you want to find a way to turn a high-rise into a target, you will be able to do so,â said one former intelligence official.
they admit they use the excuse of hamas to justify attacking overwhelmingly civilian areas.
Indeed, according to sources who were involved in the compiling of power targets in previous wars, although the target file usually contains some kind of alleged association with Hamas or other militant groups, striking the target functions primarily as a âmeans that allows damage to civil society.â The sources understood, some explicitly and some implicitly, that damage to civilians is the real purpose of these attacks.
According to the doctrine â developed by former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot, who is now a Knesset member and part of the current war cabinet â in a war against guerrilla groups such as Hamas or Hezbollah, Israel must use disproportionate and overwhelming force while targeting civilian and government infrastructure in order to establish deterrence and force the civilian population to pressure the groups to end their attacks. The concept of âpower targetsâ seems to have emanated from this same logic. The first time the Israeli army publicly defined power targets in Gaza was at the end of Operation Protective Edge in 2014. The army bombed four buildings during the last four days of the war â three residential multi-story buildings in Gaza City, and a high-rise in Rafah. The security establishment explained at the time that the attacks were intended to convey to the Palestinians of Gaza that ânothing is immune anymore,â and to put pressure on Hamas to agree to a ceasefire. âThe evidence we collected shows that the massive destruction [of the buildings] was carried out deliberately, and without any military justification,â stated an Amnesty report in late 2014.
Not only has the current war seen Israel attack an unprecedented number of power targets, it has also seen the army abandon prior policies that aimed at avoiding harm to civilians. Whereas previously the armyâs official procedure was that it was possible to attack power targets only after all civilians had been evacuated from them, testimonies from Palestinian residents in Gaza indicate that, since October 7, Israel has attacked high-rises with their residents still inside, or without having taken significant steps to evacuate them, leading to many civilian deaths. Such attacks very often result in the killing of entire families, as experienced in previous offensives; according to an investigation by AP conducted after the 2014 war, about 89 percent of those killed in the aerial bombings of family homes were unarmed residents, and most of them were children and women.
However, evidence from Gaza suggests that some high-rises â which we assume to have been power targets â were toppled without prior warning. +972 and Local Call located at least two cases during the current war in which entire residential high-rises were bombed and collapsed without warning, and one case in which, according to the evidence, a high-rise building collapsed on civilians who were inside.
therefore palestinian civilians are being killed without even being given warnings, just for the sake of terrorising other palestinians and hopefully pressuring hamas.
Six days later, on Oct. 31, the eight-story Al-Mohandseen residential building was bombed without warning. Between 30 and 45 bodies were reportedly recovered from the ruins on the first day. One baby was found alive, without his parents. Journalists estimated that over 150 people were killed in the attack, as many remained buried under the rubble. The building used to stand in Nuseirat Refugee Camp, south of Wadi Gaza â in the supposed âsafe zoneâ to which Israel directed the Palestinians who fled their homes in northern and central Gaza â and therefore served as temporary shelter for the displaced, according to testimonies.
so theyre also attacking "safe zones".
According to an investigation by Amnesty International, on Oct. 9, Israel shelled at least three multi-story buildings, as well as an open flea market on a crowded street in the Jabaliya Refugee Camp, killing at least 69 people. âThe bodies were burned ⌠I didnât want to look, I was scared of looking at Imadâs face,â said the father of a child who was killed. âThe bodies were scattered on the floor. Everyone was looking for their children in these piles. I recognized my son only by his trousers. I wanted to bury him immediately, so I carried my son and got him out.â According to Amnestyâs investigation, the army said that the attack on the market area was aimed at a mosque âwhere there were Hamas operatives.â However, according to the same investigation, satellite images do not show a mosque in the vicinity.
independent investigations are finding inconsistencies between IDF claims and reality.
According to the IDF Spokesperson, by Nov. 10, during the first 35 days of fighting, Israel attacked a total of 15,000 targets in Gaza. Based on multiple sources, this is a very high figure compared to the four previous major operations in the Strip. During Guardian of the Walls in 2021, Israel attacked 1,500 targets in 11 days. In Protective Edge in 2014, which lasted 51 days, Israel struck between 5,266 and 6,231 targets. During Pillar of Defense in 2012, about 1,500 targets were attacked over eight days. In Cast Leadâ in 2008, Israel struck 3,400 targets in 22 days. Intelligence sources who served in the previous operations also told +972 and Local Call that, for 10 days in 2021 and three weeks in 2014, an attack rate of 100 to 200 targets per day led to a situation in which the Israeli Air Force had no targets of military value left. Why, then, after nearly two months, has the Israeli army not yet run out of targets in the current war?
Israeli analysts have admitted that the military effectiveness of these kinds of disproportionate aerial attacks is limited. Two weeks after the start of the bombings in Gaza (and before the ground invasion) â after the bodies of 1,903 children, approximately 1,000 women, and 187 elderly men were counted in the Gaza Strip â Israeli commentator Avi Issacharoff tweeted: âAs hard as it is to hear, on the 14th day of fighting, it does not appear that the military arm of Hamas has been significantly harmed. The most significant damage to the military leadership is the assassination of [Hamas commander] Ayman Nofal.â
i did not share all of the article so u can feel free to read all of it but it just confirms what many of us know to be the horrific and cruel acts of the IDF.
47 notes
¡
View notes