#johan joseph zoffany

[sculppp]

Johan Joseph Zoffany  (1733 – 1810)

Self-portrait as David with the head of Goliath,detail.

[eirene]

Self-portrait as David with the head of Goliath Johan Joseph Zoffany

[visual-sandwich]

Johan Joseph Zoffany (Frankfurt 1733-London 1810) The Academicians of the Royal Academy 1771-72 Oil on canvas | 101.1 x 147.5 cm

[webweabings]

ON BEAUTY, by Kahlil Gibran (1923)

Johan Joseph Zoffany, by Johan Joseph Zoffany (1791); // A Water Baby, by Herbert James Draper (1900); '// Julius Caesar', Act III, Scene 2, Marc Antony's Oration, by William Holmes Sullivan; // A Little Sleep, by Frank Samuel Eastman (1906); // Tristán e Isolda (La muerte), by Rogelio de Egusquiza (1910); // Sleeping Fisherman with Mermaids, by Wilhelm Kray (1869); // View of the Watzmann, by Karl Millner (1863); // The Lady with the Veil, by Alexander Roslin (1768); // The Studio Mirror, by Charles Martin Hardie (1898).

[amphibious-thing]

Macaroni: Caricatures vs. Portraits

The Fly Catching Macaroni - Sir Joseph Banks

[Left: The Fly Catching Macaroni, print, c. 1772, by Matthew Darly, via Yale University Library.

Right: Sir Joseph Banks, oil on canvas, c. 1771-1773, by Sir Joshua Reynolds, via Wikimedia.]

The Macaroni Painter - Richard Cosway

[Left: The Macaroni Painter, print, c. 1772, by Richard Earlom after a drawing by Robert Dighton, via The British Museum.

Right: Detail of The Academicians of the Royal Academy, oil on canvas, c. 1771-72, by Johan Zoffany, via The Royal Collection Trust.]

The Eclipse Macarony - Colonel Dennis O’Kelly

[Left: The Eclipse Macarony, print, c. 1773, by Matthew Darly, via The British Museum.

Right: Colonel Dennis O’Kelly, before 1787, by Johann Zoffany, via Illustrated London News, 4th June 1932.]

The Illiterate Macaroni - Henry Howard, 12th Earl of Suffolk

[Left: The Illiterate Macaroni, print, c. 1772, by Matthew Darly, via The British Museum.

Right: Henry Howard, 12th Earl of Suffolk, oil on canvas, c. 1770, by Joshua Reynolds, via Wikimedia]

Charles James Cub (The Original Macaroni) - Charles James Fox

[Left: Charles James Cub Esqr., print, c. 1771, by anonymous, via The British Museum.

Right: Charles James Fox, oil on canvas, c. unknown, by Benjamin Wilson, via Bonhams.]

[the-history-of-fighting]

George III by Johan Joseph Zoffany (1771) "Johan Josef Zoffany’s 1771 portrait of George III reflects at once his aspiration to be a patriot king and the discord eroding the unity of his empire. The oil painting is so unlike any previous royal portrait that it created a sensation when it was first displayed. Never before had a British monarch been portrayed in such an informal manner. The setting, with its elaborate gilded table topped with marble and a finely upholstered chair, is elegant, but not regal. A tricorn hat and sword take the place of the crown and scepter usually depicted in royal portraits. Zoffany portrayed the king as a self-confident, untroubled man, at ease in his role. He looks relaxed and resolute. His right arm rests casually on the arm of the chair. His left hand rests on his thigh, pointed in the direction he is looking, out of the frame to the viewer’s right."

The American Revolution institute

[contosdameianoite]

Coisas que cessam, Inês Lourenço.

Tanto desprezo pelo que é transitório e finito. Não servirei senhor que possa morrer. Mas passamos a vida a amar todas as fragilidades das coisas que cessam. Há coisa mais breve do que um sorriso? Coisa mais curta que a alegria de um reencontro? Tudo o que amamos é passageiro e frágil ou as duas coisas. Mas persegue-nos a nostalgia do infindável como uma tara hereditária.

Johan Joseph Zoffany por Johann Zoffany (1733–1810)

[galleryofart]

David Garrick And His Wife By His Temple To Shakespeare

Artist: Johan Joseph Zoffany (German, 1733 - 1810) Born in Frankfurt am Main. Died in London.

Depicted People: David Garrick

Date: c. 1762

Medium: Oil on Canvas

Collection: Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, Connecticut

Garrick's Temple to Shakespeare is a small garden folly erected in 1756 on the north bank of the River Thames at Hampton in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. Grade I listed, it was built by the actor David Garrick to honour the playwright William Shakespeare, whose plays Garrick performed to great acclaim throughout his career. During his lifetime Garrick used it to house his extensive collection of Shakespearean relics and for entertaining his family and guests. It passed through a succession of owners until coming into public ownership in the 1930s, but it had fallen into serious disrepair by the end of the 20th century. After a campaign supported by distinguished actors and donations from the National Lottery's "good causes" fund, it was restored in the late 1990s and reopened to the public as a museum and memorial to the life and career of Garrick. It is reputedly the world's only shrine to Shakespeare.

Description

The temple is an octagonal domed building with a nod to the Pantheon, Rome, constructed in undecorated brick with a single east-facing entrance. It was built in the Classical style popularised by the Italian architect Palladio with an Ionic portico, four columns wide by three deep, flanking the entrance. Several steps lead up to the portico. Inside, glazed arched windows reaching to the ground face the river. A deep curved recess in the west wall provides room for a statue. Outside, a lawn and garden provide views over the Thames to the south.

[delphinidin4]

^ JOHAN JOSEPH ZOFFANY (FRANKFURT 1733-LONDON 1810) George III (1738-1820), Queen Charlotte (1744-1818) and their Six Eldest Children 1770

^ BENJAMIN WEST (1738-1820), Queen Charlotte (1744-1818) Signed and dated 1779

Detail:

^The Royal Family of England in the year 1787 - in the centre King George III (1738 - 1820), and Queen Charlotte Sophia (1744 - 1818), surrounded by their children.

^Thomas Gainsborough, series of fifteen portraits probably commissioned by Queen Charlotte of the royal family. They were painted at Windsor in September and October 1782. 

#family portraits, am i right?

[thewomanofrevelation]

johan joseph zoffany, david with the head of goliath [x]

[classic-art]

Queen Charlotte (1744-1818) with her Two Eldest Sons

Johan Joseph Zoffany, 1764 Oil on Canvas

[ludmilaspirwell]

Cove Ferris and Romeo in Johan Joseph Zoffany, Charlotte, Princess Royal and Prince William, later Duke of Clarence.

[eucanthos]

Thomas Robson

Not in display (sold) – Pinterest

appropriated:

John Raphael Smith's after Johan Joseph Zoffany RA, German, active in Britain (from 1760), The Watercress Girl, 1780.

[visual-sandwich]

Charles Townley and his Friends in the Towneley Gallery, 33 Park Street, Westminster, 1781-83

Johan Joseph Zoffany

[sartle-blog]

Sartle School of Art History: Academic Art

If there was ever a College Board for artists, it would be the art academies of the 17th and 18th centuries, specifically the Academie des Beax-Arts in France. It was founded under Louis XIV, who was just nine at the time, but grew to be a huge patron of the arts as part of his rule over France, making state control over the arts as a tenant of his absolute power. His approach to life is perhaps best summarized through its enshrinement in the Palace of Versailles.

Hyacinthe Rigaud, Louis XIV, 1701.

The first chancellor of the academy, court painter to Louis XIV, Charles Le Brun, ruled with the same fervor as his king, establishing guidelines for artists to follow in order to create good art. His theoretical approach to art set a hierarchy of genres. History was the most prestigious genre, followed by portrait, genre, landscape, animal, and still life. Le Brun also had rules about what was in the paintings and how they were painted calling it the “royal style,” devoted to glorifying the king. The subject matter was to be classical or Biblical and done in the classical style.

Over in England, the Royal Academy of Arts was founded under King George III in efforts to establish Britain as a center of the arts. Its first president, Joshua Reynolds, was also as opinionated as Le Brun, devoting a lecture series delivered at the Academy entitled Discourses on why art should have allegorical conceit.

The Ladies Waldegrave by Joshua Reynolds at the Scottish National Gallery 

The academies promoted a distinct style of classical ideals and highly finished surfaces composed of teeny tiny brushstrokes, or “licked surface”, that left no traces of the artist’s touch. This was enforced through their control over the exhibitions through the yearly Paris Salon, which the academy chose the pieces for, and education through the artists’ rite of passage, the Grand Tour, which reinforced the legacy of classical antiquity and the Renaissance.

Some of the artists exemplary of this style were Poussin and David whose harmonious, geometric compositions of classical subject matter fit all the conventions for the perfect history painting. Their works were popular with the royal and imperial patrons who, through the rationality of their compositions, promoted Enlightenment values like rational thought and loyalty to the state.

Death of Germanicus by Nicolas Poussin at the Minneapolis Institute of Art

Poussin was trained in Italy in the classical tradition, bringing his love of the classical to France. His paintings were utilized by Louis XIII and Cardinal Richelieu, and his style of clarity, logic, and order was adopted as the royal style. Although the subject matter of his paintings were allegorical, they had anchors to contemporary events, designed to promote loyalty to the state by depicting stories of said state loyalty from antiquity. David had a similar approach, glorifying the government through imagery of the Roman empire at its pinnacle, however his time was marked by political turmoil. He lived during the end of the Ancient Regime, including the overthrow of the monarchy during the revolution and the establishment of the French Republic. He was able to maintain favor during both, applying his aptitude for propaganda to support both governments.

Philosopher Lecturing at the Orrery by Joseph Wright of Derby at the Derby Museum and Art Gallery

This desire for rationality flowed into the educational institutions which applied the same scientific approach to the creation of art. Art was made into an intellectual pursuit instead of technical, raising the status of the artist. The academy set a standard arts education procedure, and aspiring artists went through vigorous training through study, first learning to draw from ancient sculptures until they were allowed to attend a life drawing class where studied human anatomy by drawing live models. This hazing of future artists instilled in them the principles and doctrines of the academy, ensuring a set standard which all artists conformed. Artists who the Academy favored set the standards for future artists. Watteau and Fragonard, Rococo artists known for their expressive colors and brushwork rather than concentration on line that defined Neoclassicism, were recognized by the Academy even though their style did not embody their teachings. The Academy not only set the standard but also broke it, the style not unchanging but flexible.

  The Academicians of the Royal Academy by Johan Joseph Zoffany in the Royal Collection

The Academy was in control of the content of art as well, as the major patron as well as the gatekeepers and tastemakers, it commissioned and favored works that conveyed moral messages and loyalty to the state. The largest patron was the state, and regular royal patronage was established in 1774 in France, increasing competition for coveted commissions and yielding yearly exhibitions of art designed to further political agendas. The Academy was wrought with nepotism, and artists like Jean-Baptist Pierre, who were trained and worked in the Academy, gave preference to those who conformed to the Academy’s standards and emulated the style. He chose topics that were designed to imbue certain virtues, glorifying French history and moralizing the French public.

Exposition au Salon de 1787 by Pietro Antoni Martini at the Met Museum

However, as these institutions lost control through periods of political upheaval, most notably the French Revolution, and the art market changed to cater to the tastes of the new middle class, artists who opposed this canon emerged. History painting made way to ambiguously categorized snapshots of everyday modern life as patrons willing to pay the high cost of producing them slowly waned and bourgeois patrons who did not have deep knowledge of art wanted something to hang in their bedroom walls. As art became a more popular industry, catering not only towards the tastes of aristocratic educated elite, the long process required to produce a history painting led to the slow decline of the genre that was emblematic of the Academic style.

The Tennis Court Oath by Jacques-Louis David at Versailles

Attempts to adapt the format to the changing interests and quickly changing political climate led to pieces like David’s The Tennis Court Oath, which was abandoned because the subject, a scene from the revolution, was irrelevant by the time it was completed and because David struggled to find a patron.

To keep up with the changing tastes, the Salon de Refuses was established to exhibit the paintings that were deemed not good enough for the official Salon. Here the works of avant garde artists like Courbet, Manet, and Pissarro  were showcased, ushering a new era of convention-breaking art.

By: Abby Li

[claire-dare]

David with the head of Goliath, 1756, oil on canvas Johan Joseph Zoffany German (1733-89) National Gallery of Victoria Melbourne