#j line

[thecollectibles]

Art by J Line

[wanderingnewyork]

A J train runs over the #Williamsburg_Bridge.

[incorrectplanet]

anthonny: i wish you would just admit when you’ve made a mistake.

haruto: *stirring coffee* i prefer it with salt.

[cookie-cos]

It’s an honest question

Why aren’t we calling J-line “Mimosa”? 

[teddie-kusuo]

Sims 4 Misamo Do not touch Loading screen Collection

Twice J-line Collection

Base game compatible

TS4 custom Loading screen

Verified and Certified by myself

Don't steal or pick my creations

Download here on Patreon link !

[uwu-momo]

MISAMO「Marshmallow」Music Video

[birthoflivevil]

[chibimats]

TWICE - Mina 미나 × Sana 사나 × Momo 모모

cuties

[egophiliac]

just kinda wanted to try something like this! not sure if I'm gonna do the rest of the guys too, but I figured I'd at least start with Riddle. 🌹

[senblades]

"I didn't want to make it seem like I was holding him hostage..."

[skybluelatte]

Happy Birthday Haruto!!!🖤🦋🖤

はるとくんお誕生日おめでとう‼ ︎🎂

[wanderingnewyork]

A J train runs along the #Williamsburg_Bridge

[incorrectplanet]

takuto: i almost got surprise adopted yesterday!

keita: what?

hiroto: he almost got kidnapped.

keita: oh okay

keita: wait, wHAT

[detroitgirl23]

Went to the beauty supply today looking for outfits and seen these nails. And why tf my nail fall off not so long after this. #333 #1018

[ookaookaooka]

I’m hardly the first person to compare them but Terry Pratchett and J K Rowling really are polar opposites in terms of the way their writing treats weird characters. In Rowling’s writing, any weirdness is there to be laughed at (for example: Professor Trelawney, the fake seer who doesn’t know she’s an actual seer). In Pratchett’s writing, though, the characters’ weirdness is taken 100% seriously and the humor arises organically from the situation itself and is never at the characters’ expense (for example: in Making Money, the man who was born a clown and was never told so until he was 13 years old). In Rowling’s writing, the main characters poke constant fun at Professor Trelawney, making joke predictions and fudging homework and talking about how divination isn’t a legitimate field of study. Even after she gets fired and more or less drops the act, the joke changes to “look at this sad drunk lady” and the main characters express little sympathy. The narrative is saying she’s there to make one real prediction and otherwise she’s only there for comic relief. This sort of thing happens over and over in Rowling’s writing, where any quirkiness is there to be laughed at and the misfortunes of characters we’re not supposed to like are supposed to be funny, and it sends a message of conformity under threat of ridicule. In Pratchett’s writing, the clown man’s story is treated as a great tragedy: imagine growing up not knowing why you are the way you are, and then finding out the truth as a teenager! And knowing that your own mother kept the truth from you! This man was so deeply traumatized by this he denied himself any humor or fun for decades, and when he has a crisis and runs off to become a clown again, he is given support and medical treatment and is welcomed back to his job at the bank and accepted for who he is. The fact that this whole situation is hilarious is secondary. And again, this sort of thing happens over and over again in Pratchett’s writing, where characters’ quirkiness is embraced and often seen as irreplaceable by the end of the book, and it sends a message that our quirks are valuable and weirdness should be acceptable. It just strikes me as a much… kinder approach to people, you know?