#it's not like problematic or anything I just don't think it represents a positive era for Vision or their current one
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Why is Vision in that fuckass suit.
#brieuc.txt#wednesday spoilers#scarlet witch and quicksilver spoilers#it's not like problematic or anything I just don't think it represents a positive era for Vision or their current one#and why are they on the front cover if they were in one (1) page#like.......... if you're going to do egregious baiting at least bait something. do you know what I mean?#anyway I still struggle with orlando's wanda voice it still feels oversimplified and I prefer what mackay is doing w/ her greatly#but Pietro was very fun and I liked him and Tommy meeting + teaming up#please have Wanda and Vision actually talk to Tommy bc neither of them have once ever properly#they've both reached out to Billy but not to Tommy like the favouritism is STRONG#I would like it if they mentioned Vision and Simon being twins for that whole power / catalyst dichotomy but I don't expect it#ANYWAY. take Vision out of that fuckass suit#STOP GIVING TOM KING'S CHARACTER ASSASSINATION MORE IMPORTANCE!!! ENOUGH!!!!!!!
7 notes
·
View notes
Note
I think the line between representing gnc women in the past and interpreting the NLOG trope as applying to any gnc woman in fiction is difficult to chart—I don’t deny that authors do this, but the thing is that real historical women did feel like this for very legitimate reasons, even if they come off as condescending today (I’d be pissed too if I was told I Had to wear skirts and corsets, and I am someone who personally really enjoys wearing skirts and corsets). Representing women who did not conform to gender norms on various different ways is important, and I don’t think Cox’s critique of any of her chosen movies/shows is particularly convincing in part because she does not acknowledge this at all—and while not every YouTube video essay has to be all things to all people, this is a touchy topic and some effort on her part would’ve been really appreciated, because it very much comes off as “gnc women make me uncomfortable” more than anything else.
See, I really don't get where the whole "she doesn't talk about real GNC women!!" thing comes from
because I am literally watching the video right now and, direct quote, "while rejecting traditional gender norms of their era happened, that doesn't mean it can only be expressed in the rejection of distinctly feminine articles of clothing..."
"And while I'm not saying there's anything wrong with breaking gender norms in historical dramas...Gentleman Jack is a good example of this...I'm frustrated with the reliance on 'Girly Bad! Boy Good!' clothing defaults...without what seems to be a second thought on how problematic it can actually be."
"The idea of creating the bloomers and the trousers could have come from this very genuine place of like 'I want...to be able to run...without having to deal with all these skirts around my legs.' And that is fair..."
and the big part, prefacing AN ENTIRE SECTION OF THE VIDEO: "Now, all that being said, I want to acknowledge the historic reality of women who did dress in masculine clothing." She actually goes further than I would in using they/them pronouns for George Sand (I have a "pronouns they used in life" policy, personally), and discusses in detail some examples of women who presented masculine at various times, for various reasons. She also gets in-depth about Gentleman Jack, and why the show was more authentic to Anne Lister's life (as a distinctly butch woman in the 1830s) for showing her having to bend slightly to accepted feminine modes of dress rather than just...sticking her in anachronistic pants all the time.
I don't think the video is perfect- it's clear what presentation Abby herself prefers, and thus she can sometimes muddy her own message. For example, to me it's clear that she's not saying it would be BAD for a suffragist character to be GNC, but it would be UNREALISTIC due to the emphasis the actual suffrage movement had to place on conventionally feminine attire to avoid distracting the press from their own message. But I can see how it might come off as "feminine suffragist character good, masc suffragist character bad" to someone with less baseline knowledge of the speaker's general views.
(It could also be hard to get that she's not decrying the rejection of feminine attire wholesale in criticizing Anne W*th an E, but rather saying that it's unfaithful to the character as originally written. Also she could have been clearer that the issue with Miss Stacy is that she would be INSTA-FIRED if, as a small-town teacher in the 1890s, she showed up to a town hall meeting in trousers. Like. I cannot overstate how fired she would get from any position overseeing children's education, as an outsider and not even an "accepted local eccentric," in a backwater like Avonlea.)
In short, while it has its issues, I don't really see that it's as horrible and prescriptivist a video as everyone makes it out to be. But you're entitled to your opinions, just as I am to mine.
52 notes
·
View notes
Note
As you mentioned a "Chloé redemption" in a post, I'ma be straight here:.. this isn't salt or anything, but why do people consider André a good mayor? Because to me he sounds rather problematic, not just because of Chloé, it's just that... he doesn't seem to truly like his job? Although my actual concerns about the overall Bourgeois family is that Chloé is a wasted character because of her "bully" status in Origins, would you really feel okay with writing her in the same place as anyone?
Oh Andre is a very problematic character.
That's the biggest reason I get annoyed with people only directing blame of Chloe's outcome to Audrey and her alone. Yes, it's bad that she left, she's not a good mother, I am not going to deny that or defend her. But Andre is at fault for Chloe's outcome too, I actually blame him more than her as he's the one who raised her. He was the one who was there. Chloe's outcome is largely on him for he is the parent that stayed and raised her. Like good for him for being there for Chloe, but he still didn't do a good job, more for spoiling her and teaching her his tricks and cheats to win and get through life easily.
Honestly, I don't think anyone in Paris really likes him, That Guy I think said Andre is meant to represent the politician that majority doesn't like but still wins despite it. I think Andre is supposed to represent the corrupt system of government and how its the minority who wins instead and get do whatever they want despite the majority wanting something else.
Either way, canon wise, I think we're seeing more and more that he himself doesn't like being Mayor. We actually see him more involved with his hotel than with running the city. Sole Crusher really implies that he's forced to do the position, and my guess is his family's expectation put him there, presuming he's from old money and traditionally they have long been involved in politics (maybe since Darkblade's era). Could also be that he really wanted to be Audrey but she wouldn't be interested in him unless he was a fashion icon (like Gabriel) or had political power. And it could also be that having political power is appealing to him. He may lack a real backbone, but he has more power than anyone else politically, and typically those who are weak or are cowards like to have power. He may not truly want it or love it, but it gives him security.
I do think his real passion and love is film and he truly wanted to be a film director, but either expectation or the appeal of political power was too strong a call. This actually makes me think of a what if au I'd love to dabble in, though its on hold while I work on certain WIPs and waiting for some clear answers that the ep Gabriel Agreste MAY answer. Hopefully. It'd be helpful.
But its a spouse swap, where Andre and Emilie actually fell in love during the filming of Silence or whatever that film was called. And Gabriel and Audrey got together/never split up. Andre and Emilie have twins and Gabriel and Audrey have a child just to have an heir though neither of them really wanted kids (it's between Adrien, Chloe, and Zoe; idk who goes where just yet, and if Adrien will have green or blue eyes). And for the sake of this, Mr Lee doesn't exist or have his fling (I guess???) with Audrey.
But back onto the ask!
I do think Chloe is problematic, but she did have potential. Honestly, there are a lot of options to start redeeming Chloe, from a loss of power that forces her to loose her status. To Audrey coming in to discipline her. To Ladybug being upfront and letting her opinions of Chloe out (playing off that Chloe holds LB in such high regard). Could have Lila take Sabrina away and Chloe is isolated and she and Marinette have a tense friendship because the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Or Adrien has enough and starts intervening, helping his friend improve, work off what Despair Bear started.
But with how canon has gone about it... yeah she can be a hard character to redeem. Both in where she is right now in canon and based on how someone feels about her. This really applies to all characters in ML, it depends on how much of canon are you working off and where are you in terms of salt towards one character. They all have potential to be well written and to grow, but it comes down to what you're writing and where are you in that moment.
61 notes
·
View notes
Note
Just bcos u PERCEIVE SessRin as something that promotes pedophilia and grooming doesn't mean that's how the author portrayed it. It's disappointing to see that antis force such idea, as if they know what's inside Rumiko's mind. It is fine if u find sessrin cringey. Just don't force your idea of pedophilia and grooming as THE CORRECT PORTRAYAL OF SESSRIN.
Hello there, nonnie! You had quite the party in my ask box, I see. Breaking it up in parts may actually help me get to the point and address your concerns swiftly and accordingly. Here goes nothing. 😉
This answer is for your first two asks by the way. Firstly, you're putting words in my mouth because I do not view Rumiko as an author who promotes pedophilia and child grooming and never have. She never once placed an ounce of romance into their scenes. Rin was essentially introduced to serve as a catalyst for Sesshomaru's character growth. That's major in and of itself, which is why I'm not sure why she needs to be the mom on top of all that she's already done for him. It was you, Sessrin shippers, who had to go and make it romantic, not us. It was you who took every innocent scene and turned it into a romantic one. You'll even use some of their scenes as proof they will end up together, then back-pedal later and say those very same scenes weren't romantic in order to protect the sanctity of your ship. I mean, which is it? It can't be both, it's either one or the other.
I repeat, NO we don’t actually think Rumiko wanted to portray this relationship with pedophillic or grooming tendencies. It's you shippers who insist there is no other way for their relationship to evolve, as if you speak on behalf of Rumiko. Your interpretation of Rumiko's work is what implies child grooming; she may not be condoning it but your perspective sure is. You talk down to antis who disagree, because in your opinion, your interpretation is not only superior but already canon in your eyes. You're doing a disservice to this fandom by spreading false information like that when you try to pass it off as official. So if it's anyone that assumes they know what goes on inside Rumiko's head, it's YOU. Somewhere down the road in the (un)foreseeable future, it's you who changes course since remember we were all in agreement at the beginning that their relationship wasn't romantic. So what did I miss? Please break it down for me and explain what exactly influenced you to change your mind, then describe in detail how again this transition in their relationship magically came to be. It's you who came to that decision on your own- nobody helped you get there, and certainly not Rumiko (as you said yourself). The user boycottyashahime put it better than I did, so here is the link to their post. I highly recommend you read it if you haven't already. I urge you to keep an open mind about it while reading, too. You may not like what they have to say, but there's no denying they make excellent points all the same.
I'm pretty sure I catch your drift, but can you clarify if you're referring to historical context or cultural context? I suppose both can be applied here. haha Anyway, from what I gather, you believe that fans should be on board with the idea of Sessrin and at the very least tolerate the pairing. Whether they ship it or not, you believe this simply for the fact that the story takes place in the feudal era and couples with a similar relationship back then were more than acceptable. The thing is, we may be transported to Feudal Japan in this story but we're still taking our modern day morals with us for the trip. I have a whole ass blog dedicated to the significance of fiction in real life (convienently pinned on my page) if you wanna check it out. I also discuss what age-appropriate content is and isn't for Inuyasha viewers in this recent ask here that I find is also pretty relevant to the convo.
Alrighty, moving onto your next point. I can't stress enough to you guys that this isn't a mere Caucasian vs. Non-Caucasian dilemma. I'm a POC, so I ask that you please not presume to know things about me you couldn't possibly know unless we met or I shared it with you. In fact, many of the other antis I frequently chat with are POCs like myself. So for all that's good and holy, please stop ignoring us when we say: THERE ARE FANS IN JAPAN WHO HATE THIS SHIP TOO. THIS ISN'T A DIFFERENCE OF CULTURE, THIS IS A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION (& FACT). It may have not been called child grooming during that time, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't; it just went under a different name, that's literally it.
Let me give you another example. So if I'm watching a movie about WWII in Nazi Germany, am I supposed to sympathize with an SS officer if the story is being narrated from his point of view? Because in his mind and during that time period, his ideology is right. Like a lot of Germany during that war, I rally to support his leader for what is in my opinion a just cause. Tell me, how does context matter in this instance? Does it matter so much so that you would adopt the same ideals just because it was "historically accurate" and you don't see anything wrong with it when you put yourself in their shoes? Does the "it's just fiction" defense come into play here, too?
The illustration I believe you are referring to is the calendar with that one official illustrator for Inuyasha, right? The thing is, an official illustrator doesn’t equal the creator of Inuyasha. They may support the Sessrin ship, but their work has no connection to the Inuyasha series in any way besides the name affiliation. I've heard that the illustrator also included Kagome x Koga art, so should we take that seriously then too? Rumiko never once alluded to a future romance between Sesshomaru and Rin, to which you even (kinda) agreed. She described their relationship as neither parental or romantic, and she added that she even contemplated making Rin a boy at first. Fun facts, y'all!
I've heard about those magazines but they sound fishy to me. Would you mind sending me a link to a reliable source that comes with an English translation? I'd like to emphasize again that illustrators or VAs can do and say as they please, but their opinions are still only opinions at the end of the day. Nothing is set in stone until Rumiko says it is.
For one, I never said my interpretation was the only correct portrayal. That's you putting words in my mouth again. What I did say, however, was that my interpretation was more logical and reasonable than yours based on popular and widely-accepted story patterns found in real life and in fiction. Look this isn't about who's more "correct" or not. You can perceive Sesshomaru and Rin's relationship any damn way you want, BUT what you cannot do is dictate how we react to your depiction of this ship. You can't demand us to view your ship a certain way to fit your preferences. I'm sure all the hate on your ship can be unbearable at times, but that's just the cross you'll have to bear for supporting such a problematic couple. If a large part of any fandom is strongly against a pairing and what it represents, then there's usually a very legitimate reason for that. You may not want to hear this, but certainly you must realize there's some truth to it all. A couple of your fellow shippers have even admitted to me that Sessrin would be wrong IRL. You see what I mean? Even if we find the ship gross, antis don't care if you choose to ship Sessrin. All we care about is you acknowledging that, like IRL, Sessrin potentially poses a lot of problems for young viewers and how they come to make sense of and view similar situations that are borderline grooming or the very thing itself. Teens watching this show are more vulnerable and impressionable, which is why it's crucial to not show relationships like Sessrin in a favorable light. If they're ever put in a situation IRL that resembles Sessrin, they need to be aware and understand that it's not at all normal or healthy for that adult to make a move on them. Let's say Sessrin does go canon, then that would mean Rin had to get pregnant around 14 or 15. Sending that kind of message to an audience made up of mostly teenagers isn't exactly wise if you ask me. Please really think about that and sit with it if you need to.
I'm positive I'm following the same story, thank you very much. Also, how can you be so confident making a statement like that when I have actual Sessrin shippers praising me for making valid points? Sorry to break it to you, but I don't think I'm as lost as you claim me to be or wish that I was.
That's a wrap, peeps!
Read over what I had to say again later and then get back to me if want, but only write me back if you plan to be respectful. Otherwise I will decline to answer. Just keep that in mind. And may I suggest only sending 1 or 2 asks at a time? Please and thank you!
I think I may know exactly who are, nonnie, but I can't say for sure. Besides, it doesn't really matter, as you have a right to stay anonymous if you so wish to. Listen, don't forget you are also more than welcome to interact (but appropriately) on my blogs/asks/etc. If you are who I think you are, then you recently did make a comment on one of them but didn't stick around when I replied back (and for good reason). Finally, if you hope to ever have a real discussion about this topic someday, first put your ego aside and refrain from throwing insults and then I'll hear you out. I have never once put you down in all of our interactions, so there's no need to show up here all riled up and aggravated in the first place. There's also no need to laugh at or mock other's opinions. Don't take jabs and assume I must not know something about Inuyasha just because I don't support your point of view. I may not agree with your opinion, but you don't see me having a condescending air about it.
Apologies if you're not the member I believe you to be, but no offense, you probably still needed to hear all of that too. It's not included here since I answered it immediately, but that final ask you sent me where you got angry and assumed I wasn't going to answer you was totally uncalled for. If you ever hope someday to participate in real discourse with me or any other antis, you should take my advice and seriously chill and learn how to be patient.
Hope this finds you well, nonnie!
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
<p>Feeling hopeless after Charlottesville? 16 ways you can make a big difference.</p>
This was the scene on Aug. 12 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.
Those are rescue workers aiding an injured, shaken woman who was plowed into by a car driven by an alleged white supremacist. In 2017. In America. It's a difficult photo to see — as are many of the other photos taken over the weekend — but it's important we all see it and recognize this image for what it is. The terrorist attack, allegedly carried out by a 20-year-old from Ohio who was in town supporting the "Unite the Right" white nationalist conference, left one victim, counter-protester Heather Heyer, dead. It injured 19 others. It's easy to feel helpless in the days following an event like Charlottesville. If you're in a position of privilege, it's maybe even easier to intentionally tune out — to put on your headphones and ignore the bigger problems waiting outside your door. But it's important we act.
If you're feeling hopeless after the events in Charlottesville, here are 13 ways you can help make a difference:
1. First and foremost, make sure you are OK.
If you're a person of color or part of another targeted marginalized group, the events in Charlottesville may have been exhausting and painful to see on TV or witness firsthand. DoSomething.org has a coping with discrimination self-care guide that includes tips like mindfully disconnecting from our often chaotic world and finding ways to channel your anger into constructive actions.
2. Become a member of the NAACP.
The NAACP is working tirelessly across the U.S. to counter the hateful forces like the ones on display last weekend. Join forces with the national group or find a local chapter — like the one in Charlottesville — to get involved.
3. Follow Sesame Street's lead and go out of your way to do something nice (big or small) for someone each day this week.
Spread kindness to everyone you encounter today. ❤️ http://pic.twitter.com/tbXLXTYphC
— Sesame Street (@sesamestreet) August 14, 2017
Give an extra big tip to your barista, call an old friend to say hello, hug your mom a little bit tighter; a simple gesture goes a long way.
4. Donate to the victims of the Charlottesville terror attack.
Beyond Heyer's tragic death, the violence on Saturday left 19 others injured. Community group Unity C-ville has set up a GoFundMe page to help with their medical costs.
5. If you're not a person of color, take 10 minutes to learn about allyship.
A 10-minute cram session certainly doesn't mean you'll become the perfect ally overnight. But listening to members of an oppressed group — or learning from resources created by someone or people of that group — will give you a good start in understanding the do's and don'ts in allyship.
6. Speaking of being an ally — signing up for a Safety Pin Box subscription is a great first step.
The service, run by black female activists, informs users about the various systems of privilege and oppression that disempower certain groups, while also giving specific tasks on how subscribers can challenge the status quo as allies in the real world.
youtube
7. Find out how your own representatives reacted to Charlottesville.
Then make some phone calls.
If they condemned white supremacy and are actively fighting for policies that promote racial justice — from criminal justice reform to affirmative action — let them know you proudly support their agenda. If your representatives didn't speak out, remind them that their silence speaks volumes.
8. Help the country Swing Left in 2018.
Racism certainly isn't confined to one party, but the GOP — led by a president who has been disturbingly connected to the KKK and other hate groups — is emboldening bigotry in ways we haven't seen in recent American history.
Progressive group Swing Left is focused on flipping the House in 2018 by zeroing in on swing districts where the GOP is vulnerable. Even if you don't live in such a district, you likely live near one that could use your help.
9. Find a protest in your own community with the Indivisible Guide.
Progressive group Indivisible is mobilizing supporters to take part in local protests in response to the white nationalist gathering in Virginia. Learn more.
This is what 682 events in solidarity with #Charlottesville look like on a map. THIS is America. Find yours: https://t.co/nKSXu3EI2w http://pic.twitter.com/Mkg15Q8FKU
— Indivisible Guide (@IndivisibleTeam) August 13, 2017
10. Report harassment online, or call on the allies at White Nonsense Roundup to step in.
Social media has become a breeding ground for racist and misogynistic attitudes. If you see others being harassed — or you're being targeted yourself — don't be afraid to report it. (Here's how you can do it on Twitter and on Facebook).
Alternately, if you're part of a marginalized group and feel targeted by others online — or even just find yourself batting away well-intentioned but problematic rhetoric — you can call on White Nonsense Roundup. If you tag the volunteer-run group, they'll jump into the comment thread to defend you and educate other commenters. Because, as the group notes, people of color already have enough on their plates — they shouldn't have to worry about educating the world, too.
11. Tune in to TV shows that tackle important issues of racial and social justice on screen.
The Trump era has given new meaning to series that routinely parse social justice issues via comedy or drama. Shows like "Black-ish," "Dear White People," and "Fresh Off the Boat" aren't just good TV — they're making a positive impact, with people of color working behind the scenes and in front of the cameras to tell their stories. Support these types of series and see what the world looks like in someone else's shoes.
The cast of ABC's "Black-ish." Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images for NAACP Image Awards.
12. Use VolunteerMatch.org to commit to volunteering once a month with a group doing social justice work in your area.
You could be an ESL tutor to immigrants in Chicago, for example, or volunteer with the Boys & Girls Club in Naples, Florida. There are plenty of online tools like VolunteerMatch.org that can pair you with reputable nonprofits in your own backyard.
13. Systemic racism is one thing. But what should you do when bigoted harassment or violence is unfolding right in front of you?
This helpful guide by the Southern Poverty Law Center, "Ten Ways to Fight Hate," details how each one of us can respond in concrete ways when we witness bigotry in our neighborhoods.
"Slurs often escalate to harassment, harassment to threats, and threats to physical violence," the guide reads. "Don’t wait to fight hate."
14. Sign up for Common Cause's Sessions Watch to keep an eye on Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
Jeff Sessions was too racist to become a federal judge in 1986. Yet, thanks to Trump, he's our attorney general, heading the Justice Department.
Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images.
Sessions' racist (and homophobic, misogynistic, and anti-Muslim) history is alarming for many marginalized groups. To help keep him accountable, sign up for Common Cause's Sessions Watch, where you'll get up-to-date notifications regarding his actions as attorney general, as well as ways you can stand up to his agenda.
15. Boost the Black Lives Matter movement on social media.
There's a good chance a Black Lives Matter local chapter is active in your neck of the woods. Find out how you — as a person of color or an ally — can help the movement grow. Aside from donating or attending events, you can Like, comment, and share the messages BLM publishes on Facebook and Twitter.
16. Help Charlottesville rally past this dark period by supporting one of its incredible local nonprofits.
Author and Twitter personality Sara Benincasa shared a thread on Twitter (and then wrote an article in the same vein) listing a number of Charlottesville organizations making their corner of the world a better place.
THREAD: I think it would be cool if tons of folks donated to good Charlottesville-based nonprofits those Nazi jerks would really hate. So...
— Sara Benincasa (@SaraJBenincasa) August 12, 2017
Like the local Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic serves Charlottesville. Donate to them here: https://t.co/RNOqz4yL3R
— Sara Benincasa (@SaraJBenincasa) August 12, 2017
Or the neighborhood Meals on Wheels.
Here's Meals on Wheels of Charlottesville @cvillemeals. They take Discover, MasterCard, Visa and American Express. https://t.co/yogYTMbcGE
— Sara Benincasa (@SaraJBenincasa) August 12, 2017
If we've learned anything from U.S. history, it's that white supremacy can't be stomped out overnight.
It will take years of painful, exhausting work to break down the systems that keep black and brown people disadvantaged at best and, at worst, intentionally oppressed.
We have our work cut out for us. But if America truly is better than what happened in Charlottesville, now's our opportunity to prove it.
0 notes