#it may not be kys current believes but they were still done in the past and people should atleast know what they have done in the past
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
moraymoth · 1 month ago
Text
I removed all the Ky-related posts, the only two I kept up were the one for Lou and the brainvomit. Sorry in advance.
ALSO PLEASE DO NOT HARRASS KY?? THAT WAS NOT MY INTENTION. DO NOT HARRASS THEM. PLEASE.
If I had known Ky was being harassed in ANY way over my opinion I would have immediately stopped posting about it oh my god
18 notes · View notes
dreaminginthedeepsouth · 4 years ago
Link
LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN
May 10, 2021
Heather Cox Richardson
A poll today by the Associated Press (AP) and the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) shows that President Joe Biden’s administration is gaining positive traction. Sixty-three percent of Americans approve of how he is handling his job as president. Seventy-one percent approve of how he is handling the coronavirus pandemic; 62% percent approve of how he is handling health care. Fifty-seven percent approve of how he is handling the economy; 54% approve of how he is handling foreign affairs.
Fifty-four percent of Americans think the country is going in the right direction. This is the highest number since 2017, but it is split by party: 84% of Democrats like the country’s direction, while only 20% of Republicans do.
Biden’s weak spots are in immigration, where 43% approve and 54% disapprove, and gun policy, where 48% approve and 49% disapprove.
And yet, Biden’s people have been working to address the influx of migrant children; White House Secretary Jen Psaki noted last week that “At the end of March, there were more than 5,000 children in Customs and Border Protection Patrol stations. Today, that number is approximately 600…. The amount of time children spend in CBP facilities is down by 75 percent — from 131 hours at the end of March to under 30 hours now.”
The administration has backed that short-term work with a long-term initiative. Last week, Vice President Kamala Harris met virtually with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the leader of the left of center populist nationalist coalition party MORENA, to talk about finding ways to promote economic development to address the root causes prompting the flight of refugees from Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and southern Mexico. They also talked about working together to protect human rights and dismantle the criminal networks that smuggle migrants. She will travel to Guatemala and Mexico in June, where she will meet with their leaders.
Disapproval of Biden’s gun policies might well reflect a desire for a stronger stance. In April, a Morning Consult/Politico poll showed that 64% of registered voters supported stricter gun control laws. We have had an average of ten mass shootings a week in 2021, 194 in all. (A mass shooting is one in which four people are killed or wounded.)
This week, Biden will be meeting with bipartisan groups of leaders, including Representative Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), to begin to hammer out an infrastructure measure based on his American Jobs Plan. He will also meet with Senators John Barrasso (R-WY), Roy Blunt (R-MO), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Pat Toomey (R-PA), Roger Wicker (R-MS), and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), who have proposed their own $568 billion proposal without corporate tax hikes.
As the good news from the administration is starting to filter into the media, bad news from the Trump wing of the Republican Party is also starting to get traction. On Saturday, we learned that at retreats in March and April, staff for the National Republican Congressional Committee refused to tell lawmakers how badly Trump is polling in core battleground districts, where 54% see Biden favorably while only 41% still favor Trump. Vice President Kamala Harris, the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, and the $2.3 trillion American Jobs Plan are all more popular in those districts than the former president.
Indeed, it is more than a little odd that party leaders are bending over backward to tie their party to a former president who, after all, never broke 50% favorability ratings—the first time in polling history that had happened—and who lost both the White House and Congress.
Another set of data from Catalist, a voter database company in Washington, D.C., shows that the 2020 election was the most diverse ever, with Latino and Asian voters turning out in bigger numbers than ever before. Black voting increased substantially, while Asian-American and Pacific Islander voters had a decisive increase in turnout. The electorate was 72% white, down 2% from 2016 and 5% from 2008. Thirty-nine percent of Biden-Harris voters were people of color (61% were white); only 15% of Trump-Pence voters were POC (85% were white).
This demographic trend is behind the new voter suppression bills in Republican states. But the racial breakdown of the 2020 vote is not the only problem for the current Republican Party. The biggest turnout gains in 2020 were among young voters, 18 to 40 years old, who now make up 31% of voters, while those over 55 have dropped to only 44% of the electorate. Younger voters skew heavily toward the Democrats. Also notable was that women break heavily toward Democrats by a 10 point gap—79% of women of color support Democrats; 58% of white women voted for Biden-Harris—and women make up 54% of the electorate overall.
News out of the private “recount” in Arizona by Cyber Ninjas, a company without experience in election recounts and whose owner has already gone on record as believing that rigged voting machines in Arizona cost Trump victory, continues to be embarrassing as well. Although the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, which has a Republican majority, said the count was fair and opposed a recount, sixteen Republicans in the state senate voted to give the ballots for Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix, to the company for a private recount. The count has been plagued by conspiracy theories—one observer claimed they are examining the ballots for signs of bamboo in the paper to show that tens of thousands of ballots were flown in from Asia—and it turned out that one of the people recounting the ballots had been at the January 6 riot at the Capitol. Now the “recount” is running so far behind it appears it won’t be done until August, rather than May 14 as the company promised.
State senator Paul Boyer, who voted for the “audit,” told New York Times reporter Michael Wines: “It makes us look like idiots…. Looking back, I didn’t think it would be this ridiculous. It’s embarrassing to be a state senator at this point.”
And then, this morning, the Washington Post dropped a long, investigative story by reporters Emma Brown, Aaron C. Davis, Jon Swaine, and Josh Dawsey revealing that the arguments former president Trump has grabbed to “prove” the election was stolen from him were part of a long conspiracy theory hatched in 2018 by Russell J. Ramsland, Jr., “a Republican businessman who has sold everything from Tex-Mex food in London to a wellness technology that beams light into the human bloodstream.” The story follows how Ramsland’s theories, which were debunked as “bat-s**t insane” by White House lawyers, got pumped into the media by Representative Louie Gohmert (R-TX) and Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani, among others, and how Trump came to embrace them.
While Republican leaders are still standing behind those theories, and the former president, opponents of the party’s direction are pushing back not just against Trump but also against those leaders supporting him. Representative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) tweeted this morning: “A few days before Jan 6, our GOP members had a conference call. I told Kevin [McCarthy] that his words and our party’s actions would lead to violence on January 6th. Kevin dismissively responded with ‘ok Adam, operator next question.’ And we got violence.”
Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) has narrated a video distributed by the Republican Accountability Project recalling the violence of January 6, blaming Trump for spreading lies about the election, and reminding viewers that more than 60 lawsuits disproved his claims that the election was stolen. The video says “we are the party of Lincoln. We are not the party of QAnon” (showing an image of Jacob Chansley, the so-called “QAnon Shaman,” who wore a horned headdress during the Capitol insurrection) “or white supremacy” (showing an image of Fox News Channel personality Tucker Carlson). “We cannot embrace insurrection” (showing a picture of Georgia Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene). “President Trump provoked an attack on the United States Capitol which resulted in five people dying. That is a person who does not have a role as a leader of our party going forward.” The video features an image of McCarthy standing with Trump. Cheney made it clear she was not about to shut up.
This afternoon, McCarthy released a statement calling for Cheney’s ouster as conference chair, featuring the line: “[u]nlike the left, we embrace free thought and debate.” (References to George Orwell, who famously wrote about how fascists used language to rewrite history, were all over Twitter.) McCarthy and other Trump loyalists have suggested that Cheney needs to go because she keeps talking about the past, but Allan Smith of NBC News points out that Trump himself seems to be the one who cannot stop talking about the past.
—-
LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN
HEATHER COX RICHARDSON
6 notes · View notes
Text
Heather Cox Richardson:
April 15, 2020 (Wednesday)
The biggest news today was Trump’s announcement that, unless the Senate resumes confirming his nominees, he will adjourn both chambers of Congress and make recess appointments to fill the slots. Trump claimed he has “constitutional authority” to do this, likely referring to Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution, which deals with the relationship of the president to Congress. That section gives the president the power to convene Congress in an emergency—as presidents have done—and also to adjourn them “to such time as he shall think proper.” But there is another clause in that sentence providing that he can adjourn them only “in case of disagreement between [the Houses], with respect to the time of adjournment.” There is no such disagreement between the House of Representatives and the Senate; they have agreed to end the session on January 3, 2021.
Trump is unhappy because members of Congress have left Washington due to the pandemic, and the Houses are staying open through “pro forma” sessions. These sessions are “in form only,” and consist of members showing up simply to indicate that their Chamber is still open. They have attracted political controversy for years because these sessions stop a president from making recess appointments.
Trump wants to make such appointments to insert into office people who would not win Senate approval, like his current nominee for Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe (R-TX), who had to withdraw the first time Trump considered him because he was unqualified. “The current practice of leaving town while conducting phony pro forma sessions is a dereliction of duty that the American people cannot afford during this crisis,” Trump said at the day’s coronavirus briefing. “It’s a scam.”
Most of the vacancies that require Senate confirmation are empty not because the Senate is refusing to take them up, but because Trump has not nominated anyone.
Because Senate confirmations take time, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has been focusing on confirming Trump’s judges. Under Trump, the Republican Senate has been packing the courts with judges sympathetic both to business interests and to a strong theory of the unitary executive. The Republican Party is using the government to promote business and protect the wealthy, and they are cementing their cause in the courts where judges can protect their ideology even if the American people turn emphatically against it. To this end, McConnell blocked President Barack Obama’s judicial appointments—including one to the Supreme Court—and has rushed through Trump’s, enabling Trump to appoint almost as many federal judges in three years as Obama did in eight.
Trump’s judges also tend to adhere to a strong theory of the unitary executive, a theory that puts the president out of reach of any check from Congress or the courts because that would impinge on the separation of powers, and any check from the FBI or the Department of Justice because those are within the Executive branch. With today’s announcement that the Supreme Court on May 12 will take up the question of whether or not Congress or a state prosecutor has the power to investigate Trump's finances, his need for judges who believe in a virtually untouchable executive is likely on his mind.
Trump's belief that the courts will side with him was clear in the briefing. “They know they’ve been warned and they’ve been warned right now. If they don’t approve it, then we’re going to go this route and we’ll probably be challenged in court and we’ll see who wins,” he told reporters.
Still, this was likely an empty threat. The unprecedented step of trying to adjourn Congress would spark a fierce backlash among lawmakers of his own party, among others. Trump’s sudden attention to an often-forgotten power in the Constitution’s Article 2, Section 3 would undoubtedly call to mind the famous duty the same section requires of the president: “he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”
Trump’s dramatic assertion of his authority is likely in part because he remains determined to “reopen” the country against the advice of health professionals, and his insistence yesterday that he had “absolute authority” over the states to do so met with a swift backlash. Reports say that Trump thinks a recovering economy is his best hope for reelection, and is keen to get us back up and running.
But business leaders he has recruited as part of the effort are warning him that the country needs more testing before Americans will feel safe enough to resume normal lives. “Unless people feel safe and secure and confident around the virus, the economic impact will continue in some way, shape or form,” Goldman Sachs chief Executive David Solomon has told the president. Polls bear Solomon out: a Fox News poll this week showed that 80% of voters want the federal government to issue a national stay-at-home order, and 47% of them thought Trump was not taking the virus seriously enough. “We have the best tests in the world,” Trump said today, then told reporters that states were “much better equipped” than the federal government to perform such tests. (There is, in fact, a great shortage of tests.)
Still, Trump’s right-wing advisors insist that the economy will only deteriorate unless the economy opens back up and business resumes. Reopening, they say, will cause coronavirus deaths but prevent suicides. This message is resonating among Trump’s supporters, who blame Democrats for overreacting to the pandemic.
People showing Trump signs and flying Confederate flags organized “Operation Gridlock” in Michigan’s capital of Lansing to protest the shelter-at-home orders lasting until April 30 imposed by Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat. Michigan has the third-highest number of Covid-19 cases among the states and the lockdown has lowered infections, but Republican state legislators and congress members have criticized the sweeping order. Drivers of several thousand cars blocked the Lansing streets to protest what they see as an infringement of their liberty.
This dynamic enables Trump to divert attention from his mishandling of the virus by blaming Democrats for the faltering economy. Trump frequently attacks Whitmer, and today’s protesters shouted “Lock her up.” (Interestingly, CNN ran a story today noting that the world’s female leaders have been far more effective at managing the coronavirus than the world’s male leaders.)
The Michigan protesters say they are worried about paying their bills, which should bring attention to today’s news from the nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, noting that Senate Republicans added a provision to the $2.2 trillion coronavirus relief bill that wealthy investors, especially real estate investors, have wanted since 2017. In addition to the more than $500 billion already in the package, the provision will allow unlimited deductions for businesses losses, a rule that is retroactive for the past five years and which will cost taxpayers about $90 billion in 2020 alone. More than 80% of the benefits of the change will go to those who earn more than $1 million a year. Alan D. Viard of the right-leaning think tank the American Enterprise Institute wrote that the measure “gives businesses badly needed liquidity during the coronavirus pandemic while also reducing the tax penalty on risky business investments.”
An op-ed in the Washington Post today from the leaders of the Lincoln Project urged Republicans to desert Trump in 2020. Five prominent Republicans (or former Republicans), including lawyer George Conway III and Republican strategist Steve Schmidt wrote “We’ve never backed a Democrat for president. But Trump must be defeated.” Their op-ed praised former Vice President Joe Biden for putting country over party, and called Trump Biden’s “photonegative.” “Unlike Trump,” they wrote, “Biden is not an international embarrassment, nor does he demonstrate malignant narcissism. A President Biden will steady the ship of state and begin binding up the wounds of a fractured country. We have faith that Biden will surround himself by advisers of competence, expertise and wisdom, not an endless parade of disposable lackeys.”
They went on: “We are in a transcendent and transformative period of American history. The nation cannot afford another four years of chaos, duplicity and Trump’s reality distortion. This country is crying out for a president with a spine stiffened by tragedy, a worldview shaped by experience and a heart whose compass points to decency.”
Tomorrow Trump will unveil new federal guidelines to begin the process of reopening the country.
---
Also available as a free newsletter at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
1 note · View note
getoffthesoapbox · 7 years ago
Text
[VKM Spec] Investigating VKM 14
Tumblr media
We’re starting the year off on much more solid footing than we began last year--with VKM 13.5 and now VKM 14, the story seems to be headed in a better direction than before. I, for one, am relieved to see this, and hope this trend continues for the remainder of the story. We only take small steps forward this chapter, but the good news is, as far as I can tell, we don’t take any steps backward either. 
The irony hasn’t escaped me that not three days after I complained about Hino’s storytelling tanking, she put out what is arguably the best action/suspense chapter she’s written since the end of the Rido arc. Either someone put a bug in her ear, or we’re headed in a direction that she’s actually excited about writing. Whichever it is, this is a distinct improvement to the lackluster writing and artwork we’re accustomed to, and it’s a welcome change. The old girl’s still got it in her. Let’s see if she can keep it up.
That being said, let’s get to it. Scanlations can be found in the usual places.
Obligatory disclaimer for the sensitives: This post is “zeki criticism” and “anti ky”. Please blacklist those tags accordingly.
Marking Time
Tumblr media
The first thing that struck me when I saw the opening page of this chapter was the teaser line. I couldn’t figure out what it was about the line that gripped me, other than the obvious: it’s clearly a reference to the significant amount of time Zero’s been waiting for Yuuki to say something to him. But when I was flipping through volume 19 the other day, I realized what it was that had caught my attention--this teaser line in VKM 14 is a direct reference to Zero’s request from the original epilogue of Night 93, a request that apparently narratively is still unanswered from Yuuki.
So this teaser line is a callback to that chapter, and it also tells us several things:
Zero is still waiting for Yuuki’s reply to his request from Night 93. 
VKM 9′s confession was not the answer to that request. 
We are not going to be ignoring the events that took place at the end of the original series in order to move Zero and Yuuki’s story forward.
We will likely be revisiting the original series to sort out why Yuuki still hasn’t given Zero an answer after all this time.
While it’s disheartening to recall how long Zero’s been waiting for a response to his request in Night 93, at the same time I’m quite heartened by the fact that he (and Hino and her editor) does not consider his request properly responded to by Yuuki. This is a huge relief to me as someone who was not happy with Yuuki’s manner of confessing to Zero in VKM 9. One of the weights from my shoulders as far as this story is concerned has been lifted with this reference, at least for now. I’m now hopefully optimistic that we’re not finished with the revelations on Yuuki’s side about her past and her past choices, and I’m also more hopeful that we might actually get a legitimate confession from her about her true feelings for Zero in the future. 
So as far as I’m concerned, this little teaser line was a great way to start the chapter. If this was all the chapter contained, I’d be happy enough, but lucky for me this is only the beginning of the goodies.
The Usual Suspects
Tumblr media
This chapter really expanded the possibilities for the suspects behind the Vampire King bombings, but it also threw some of my theories right out the window, which is rather interesting. There’s a lot to unpack on this side of the plot, so buckle your seat belts and get ready for the ride.
We begin the chapter with a secret meeting in the underground area between Maria and Kaien. @jadedmemories mentioned to me that if we take the title page as a canon “scene”, it’s quite possible Zero was listening in on what Maria and Kaien were discussing, as in, potentially he doesn’t trust either of them. It’s an interesting possibility, and one worth keeping in mind as future chapters unfold, I think. For now there’s not much to be done with the information.
It’ll probably be easiest if I separate this section by suspect and work through what we know and don’t know of each one. I made a funny list of suspects here for anyone who wants a more thorough review of each one, but for now I’m only going to discuss the most likely suspects and the ones that are relevant to this chapter in particular. First, we’ll start with some general observations:
The Vampire King’s True Purpose
Before this chapter came out, I was hesitant to make any guesses as to what the Vampire King mastermind was aiming for. But with three bombing incidents under our collective belts, a few potential purposes are starting to rise above the others. 
With only the first two incidents, I was torn as to who the target of the Vampire King’s ultimate “message” was--I thought it could be Zero, Yuuki, Zero and Yuuki together, or the general efforts of Yuuki/Zero/Aidou/Takuma/Kaien to make the world more accepting of vampires.
With this third incident, I believe the target of the Vampire King’s message is either Yuuki or Zero specifically and individually. The rest is smoke and mirrors to give the group legitimacy and to act as a screen for the true purpose. I’ll break down the two options for now and explain which one I’m leaning toward currently, but we can’t make any positive conclusions until we get more information:
Target A: Yuuki - Yuuki being the ultimate target for the Vampire King’s mastermind is on the surface the most sensible conclusion. The name “Vampire King” itself is a direct reference to Kaname that would strike her heart more than any other’s. The first attack happened to Yuuki’s friends, the second attack happened to her pseudo-partner, the third attack both threatened something she holds dear (children’s safety) and also stole her pseudo-partner from her (Zero’s kidnapping). If she’s the target, the Vampire King likely a.) wants to use Zero’s safety as leverage to stop her from doing something (likely the cure research, since she’s in charge of Aidou) or b.) wants to separate her from Zero for some reason or c.) wants to harass her and cause her pain out of a misguided attempt to “get even” for Kaname’s past actions, since she’s connected to him. 
Target B: Zero - Although I think the Yuuki option has potential, ultimately my gut is telling me Zero is the true target of all of this insanity. And by target I mean he’s both the person to capture (literal target) and the person to whom the message of the group is meant to be delivered. The group’s name “Vampire King” will still reach Zero just as much as it would reach Yuuki--Yuuki, in this variant, is the “bait” to get Zero involved, rather than vice versa. So the first attack happens to Yuuki’s friends, which gets Yuuki involved, which gets Zero involved. But the second attack is deliberately for Zero, and the vampire who commits the action has an insult specifically for Zero, despite Zero not even knowing the guy. The third incident, in this scenario, is actually a decoy and a set up--whoever the Vampire King mastermind is, they know Zero will be in charge of the investigation, so they pick a target he’s sensitive to (children) and set up landmine explosives in an obvious location where he’s sure to be the first to try to help anyone who gets caught up in it. They may or may not plant info with Kain to get Kain to bring Yuuki (though right now I think Yuuki’s presence was a mistake and unintended by the Vampire King mastermind), and then while Zero’s distracted “saving” whoever gets caught up in the mines, he either dies or gets kidnapped (the true objective). If this is true, then the kidnapping is actually to get Zero before the Vampire King mastermind to allow the mastermind the opportunity to talk to him without a certain nosy pureblood’s interference. Likely, if Zero is the true target, the Vampire King mastermind is going to use Zero’s desire to save people as leverage to get Zero to do something for him/her: either a.) stop Aidou’s research, b.) separate Zero from Yuuki, or c.) help Aidou’s research to get Kaname back sooner, depending on the ultimate goal. They’d get Zero to help them by blackmailing him, using a threat against future targets as bait. Then they’d likely release Zero so that he can return to Yuuk on his own, but with the blackmail hanging over his head. For an example of how fun this type of plotline is, see Sherlock BBC’s The Great Game episode. 
The reason I’m currently leaning toward Zero as the ultimate target of the mastermind is simply because Yuuki’s for the most part a fairly passive character and because of how long it’s been since the forge was created. If the mastermind was after Yuuki because of some grudge over Kaname, well, it’s been 50-70 years depending on how old Yori was when she died. That’s a long time to hold a grudge against someone who’s just related to the person in question. It’d be far better to just plan an attack against the forge itself, if the forge was the problem. As for other reasons to go after Yuuki’s loved ones, there really aren’t any other than maybe a bored Pureblood wanting to start a war and stop the coexistence efforts. Even if that’s true, this particular style of Vampire King activity doesn’t seem particularly effective toward that end. Especially when it’s highlighting the vampires as the problem, rather than simply being a declaration against Yuuki herself or her comrades. 
If Zero is the person the mastermind is after, we have a lot more room to play. Zero has more enemies than Yuuki, and more people with animus toward him for his role as a Hunter and as Yuuki’s pseudo-partner. Zero also has unresolved pot threads about his special status as the only hunter twin to ever be born a twin, not to mention Takuma’s secret in reference to the Shizuka incident. On top of that, it’s been made very clear that his relationship with Yuuki is not approved of in most quarters, and the hunters (who would go after Yuuki, rather than Zero) for the most part seem accepting of his situation, thus they’re unlikely to be part of the problem. Zero also is potentially a cure component, which may be a factor, and he’s part of the reason the hunters aren’t killing vampires anymore (so if this is an action by the anti-vampire faction, Zero might be a prime target as an agent of improving the lot of criminal vampires and thus seen as an enemy to their agenda). 
Again, at this time this is only speculation at best; we simply don’t have enough information to make any firm conclusions either way. I’m honestly not sure anymore how smart Hino is, so perhaps the most obvious conclusion is the best in this situation. 
Kidnapped!
Zero’s kidnapping this chapter brings up a few questions: 
Was the purpose of the bombing threat a decoy to lure Zero out and to kidnap him?
Is Zero’s kidnapping part of the Vampire King’s plot or is it from a second party?
Was Zero the intended target or was he captured by accident?
If Zero was the intended target, why? If he was captured by accident, who was the real target?
Did Zero orchestrate his own kidnapping for a reason?
It may seem kind of silly to bring up the idea that Zero might have had himself kidnapped but given how peacefully he departs from Yuuki’s side, it’s quite possible. There’s no sign of a struggle, and although he does look over his shoulder before he disappears, his expression isn’t anxious or shocked. Whatever he sees isn’t unexpected. 
I’m not sure how likely this is, however, but if his kidnapping was a genuine kidnapping that leaves even more questions. Why was he not shocked to see the person kidnapping him? Why didn’t he struggle? How did the kidnapper surprise him and knock him out without a struggle or even a word of warning to Yuuki? How did Yuuki not notice another person was there?
There are a couple options I can think of. One is that the person who approached Zero was one he expected to be there (limiting our options to Maria, Goggles Guy, or Mimi), who perhaps covered his mouth with something like a chloroform-soaked cloth to knock him out. The other is that a person didn’t approach him--a pureblood blood creature did, such as Sara’s spiders or Kaname’s bats. If it’s the latter, he could be easily whisked away the way Kaname did for Yuuki in Night 60 or the way Touma did with his bats in Night 59 and 60. This would imply a pureblood is working with the Vampire King, though they may not be the mastermind. We know Yuuki has a hard time sensing the pureblood creatures, as it took her a few minutes to figure out the fake Kaname back in Night 76; it would be entirely possible for a pureblood to whisk Zero away quickly using these creatures rather than their physical selves.
All of this brings up some very interesting questions, which unfortunately we’ll have to wait two months (or perhaps more) to get answers. 
Suspect A: Kaien
In my review of VKM 13, I mentioned Kaien as a potential suspect. After VKM 14, I’m leaning toward him being a red herring, as much as this pains my Kaien-detesting heart. =P 
On the surface, he’s still a great candidate for mastermind of the whole operation. Here’re the points in his favor:
He meets Maria in secret and spills a “secret” to her.
He has time to plant the bombs.
Although he’s not at the scene of the crime, that could be because a.) he already planted the bombs, b.) the Zero kidnapping isn’t part of the Vampire King activities, or c.) he planted the bombs and his associates kidnap Zero, leaving him free to attack other towns.
At the mayor candidate rally, he talks about his ideals and runs off with a suspicious bag in his hand. (Thanks, @jadedmemories for pointing that out to me.)
That being said, here are the reasons I feel he’s a red herring now:
Yuuki got caught up in the mess, which I don’t feel he would have intended, and surely he’d know that this particular style of target would get her attention.
The target was a bunch of kids, which isn’t his style--although he has no problem putting teenagers in danger, he still looked after and cared for Yuuki and Zero as children and likely wouldn’t threaten kids.
Although we don’t find out Kaien’s secret, we do find out that he asked Maria to reach out to the Academy alumni, which (while perhaps a decoy) implies whatever he’s working toward is ultimately altruistic or at worst benign in nature and something he thinks other people will support.
Hino made a point in VKM 11 of showing Kaien has some regrets about how he handled his life, and she reiterated this in VKM 6 when he was talking with Yori’s dad. 
His motives for committing these attacks (especially now that human children have been involved) seem fairly weak and counterproductive to his other stated goals.
All in all, while it’s still certainly possible that Kaien could be the ultimate mastermind or part of the Vampire King group, in the end I think he’s probably a red herring whose activities will end up helping Yuuki and/or Zero in the end. He does have access to a pureblood, Isaya, who could have helped him kidnap Zero, but there are also other purebloods who could do the same thing with potentially more motive.
Suspect B: Maria
Hino conveniently decided to bring Maria back after all this time in VKM 14. I don’t think she was brought back just to resurrect Yuuki’s limp jealousy over a man she’s been pushing away romantically for over 50 years. Depending on whether or not Maria has a role to play in the Vampire King group, the reason for her return will change.
It is possible she’s part of the Vampire King group, and we’re meant to suspect her. If she is a part of the group, however, I don’t believe she’s the mastermind. Before we get to that, let’s start with why she might be a potential suspect:
She randomly decides to help patrol the tunnels despite this being out of character for her, which Zero (being the most intuitive character of the cast) immediately points out.
She has a secret meeting with Kaien where she’s framed suspiciously.
When she talks about people being on the move thanks to the academy in the first scene with Kaien, Hino puts her speech bubble over the crime scene from later in the chapter. The framing is rather ominous. 
She’s working with a human we’ve never met before, who has some ambiguous connections to the former academy.
We know nothing of her whereabouts during the last few years since Night 93. We only know at some point there was a scene where she sadly watched Zero walking away, which was during the original Night 92 epilogue and where she had her original hairstyle. When that scene was and what it was about, we still don’t know.
Hino makes rather a big deal out of her wish to protect “what” she loves like Ichiru. This might imply that, if she is involved with the Vampire King, she is doing it out of misguided altruism. 
She’s clearly still interested in Zero romantically, even if she’s not actively pursuing him.
She and her human partner were patrolling the area near where the landmines were, yet neither of them noticed the landmines. 
Her human partner has a suspicious line about suspicious things “lying around” right before Yuuki and Mimi step on the landmines.
It’s quite possible that the reason Zero isn’t shocked or startled by whoever approaches him from behind is because it’s Maria herself, who he expects to be in the area. He likely wouldn’t struggle against her initially if she was the one who kidnapped him.
I think it’s certainly possible Maria might be involved with the Vampire King, but it’s also possible that she’s not and her partner is, and that it’s a huge coincidence that she happened to be there at the time. If the latter, then her role will likely be to cause some small trouble for Yuuki and make Yuuki question some things about herself, as Maria’s role has been since arc 2.
If Maria is involved in this whole business, she’s certainly not the mastermind. She doesn’t have nearly the motive or connections to mastermind this. While she does care for Zero and has certainly worked with shady figures in the past (Shizuka), she usually is on the side of right or good--though she was Yuuki’s rival for Zero, she still helped her against Kaname and Sara. The only way I can see her being involved in this is if the mastermind has convinced her that Yuuki is bad for Zero and needs to be separated from him (hearkening back to her wish to protect the things she loves like Ichiru). Maria doesn’t love the kids at the kindergarten, and as far as we know she only cares about two things: Ichiru (who is inside Zero) and Zero. This makes it likely that the thing she wants to protect is Zero. If that’s true, then it’s quite possible she’s involved in his kidnapping. 
However, it’s also possible that she (like Kaien) is merely a red herring. If she is just a red herring, then her open and honest confession of her goals and feelings is actually in the story to serve as a foil to Yuuki, who lies about hers. Maria’s open and honest affection stands in contrast to Yuuki’s inability to be truthful about her own feelings, something she’s struggled with for the entire story. Even if Maria isn’t involved in the Vampire King organization, she still serves a vital purpose in both making Yuuki reassess herself in the canon itself and also stands as an ideal to contrast Yuuki for the reader. 
Suspect C: Goggles Guy
Maria’s human companion, who I have dubbed Goggles Guy in lieu of a proper name, has a few points in his favor as being partnered to the Vampire King group, but if he is partnered with them, that opens up a whole different can of worms as to why a human would be partnered with Level C and potentially noble/pureblood vampires to sow chaos and drag the vampires through the mud. His involvement with the Vampire King group muddies the waters of potential motives, but he’s suspicious enough that I can’t write him off simply because he makes things difficult. 
Points in his favor as a potential member of the Vampire King group:
We’ve never seen him before, yet he knows enough about the tunnel threat to volunteer for the vigilante group.
Although his story about his grandmother may be true, we know nothing about the remainder of his background. He could potentially be from a hunter family and be bearing some kind of grudge.
Hino has him speak a suspiciously prescient line about suspicious objects being set up and returning to an “original objective.” On the surface, this line is innocent, but as a foreshadowing technique it may implicate him as the very one who set the landmines.
This is intuitive on my part, but Hino drew his goggles to be deliberately provoking--whenever a character’s eyes are hidden, that’s usually a sign to pay attention. There was no reason to remove his goggles when we first meet him and then put them back on his face right as he speaks his most suspicious line.
If the above points are true, he is, just like Maria, probably a pawn being used in the Vampire King mastermind’s ultimate plan. This guy just doesn’t seem to have enough going for him to be a mastermind in his own right, and certainly not one who could organize kamikaze Level Cs/Ds to bomb themselves.
But as with Maria and Kaien, Goggles Guy may also ultimately be a red herring. Points against him:
His motive for joining the vigilante corps seems legitimate and sincere; Hino doesn’t use any paneling or screentone tricks to make his story feel suspicious.
Even if he’s an angry member of the anti-vampire faction, it seems strange that he’d join an organization that utilizes vampires and looks down on humans (if we assume that the second suicide bomber was an accurate representation of the people involved with this group).
He’s a human, and should have more trouble kidnapping Zero than a vampire might. 
His motives seem weak, despite how suspicious he looks. 
We know nothing of this guy, which narratively renders him fairly innocuous, much like the evil purebloods in volume 19. Hopefully Hino isn’t going to repeat that mistake again.
Of the characters presented this chapter, Goggles Guy is the most likely to be involved in some way, though I doubt he’s anything more than a pawn ultimately.
Suspect D: Mimi
The last suspect really highlighted by this chapter is Mimi. I’ll cover the other options in the last sub-section together. Mimi’s only appeared in two chapters so far--VKM 6, where she annoyed Yuuki at the vampire lounge and later attacked Yori with the yankee doodle vampire, and now in VKM 14. Of the potential suspects this chapter, I feel she’s the weakest, but she is the last known person to have seen both Zero and Yuuki, and that can’t be discounted entirely.
Points in her favor as an accomplice to the Vampire King plot:
She has a known animus against Zero in particular and humans in general (Yori).
She’s a petty criminal and knows the tunnels very well.
She appeared suddenly this chapter after not being mentioned at all for a while.
She’s in the last panel showing Zero and Yuuki fighting the bomb. It’s quite possible she’s the one who runs up to Zero and knocks him out.
That being said, I really don’t think she’s involved at all. Reasons why I lean this way:
Mimi’s dumb as a box of rocks and can’t keep her mouth shut for two minutes flat.
Her narrative role appears to be filling in as the Yuuki sidekick character since Aidou is being used for other purposes and Zero has been removed. 
She’s being used to help Yuuki articulate her thoughts in a sincere way, and these conversations would be seriously undermined by villainous activity.
She steps on the damn landmine. What conspirator steps on the landmine? Yes, it offers authenticity, but there was no guarantee she’d escape unscathed unless it was a dud she stepped on which we know it wasn’t. 
Unless she’s speed running in that last panel that shows her head, she’s too far away to be the culprit who kidnaps Zero. The shot we see from behind her is also potentially a perspective shot of the person who DID attack Zero, and who IS running past her to get to him (hence the angle and speed). 
Hino never paints her suspiciously in the chapter, unlike Kaien, Maria, and Goggles Guy. 
There’s an interesting moment where Mimi points to Zero with Maria/Goggles Guy and demands to know why he’s not on Yuuki’s team and is on Maria’s. This is a potential narrative device foreshadowing the arc that’s about to come, with Zero “on the Vampire King’s side” due to blackmail, and Yuuki/Mimi having to figure out why. A device like this normally isn’t used for or by villainous characters.
It may be my bias toward Mimi talking here, but honestly she’s the most refreshing character in this story since Ai lost a lot of her charm and flatlined, and I’d hate to see her used for villainous purposes when there are plenty of other, superior candidates.
Suspect X: Everyone Else
I won’t go too deeply into the other options for the Vampire King mastermind this chapter, but a quick list of characters who are still potential masterminds despite not being directly involved this chapter:
Ai - Ai’s an unlikely candidate, but since we know she can wake up and go back to sleep, it’s entirely possible she’s somehow involved, rendering this whole Vampire King thing a big sham. Given how violent it has been so far, I think she’s an unlikely choice, but we can’t rule her out yet.
Isaya - Isaya’s not normally an active character, but he can be in the right situation. Perhaps he’s off his rocker.
Takuma - My favorite option, and the one who appears the most innocent and has the most potential for juicy narrative twists. He’s not in this chapter of course, but “someone” had to tip Kain off on what was going on, and we don’t know who that someone was.
Kain - An unlikely option, given he was one of the earliest victims, but still possible since he’s the one who gave Yuuki the intel.
Kaito - With the return of Maria, the first of the two anti-Zeki characters, it’s not a stretch to imagine Kaito might return as well to be a foil to Zero, especially if in the interim between Night 93 and VKM 14 Kaito was attacked and turned by a pureblood. Kaito has a distinct animus against vampires and purebloods, and he is not supportive of Zero’s relationship with Yuuki. There’s also a scene in Night 93 of Kaito watching over Zero hugging Yuuki which might feed into this possibility. Hino hasn’t shown us what happened to Kaito for a reason, and what that reason is may be relevant to this new plotline.
Other random purebloods/nobles/level cs/humans/hunters - The Vampire KIng mastermind could certainly be someone we’ve never met yet. I would be disappointed if this were the case, but it’s entirely possible. Who knows who or why this group has been cobbled together. 
So as is evident, we have quite a bit of potential for who the Vampire King culprit is. Hopefully the next few chapters will give us some new information, but for now we can enjoy the speculation. ;)
A Breath of Fresh Air
Tumblr media
Mimi is a complete delight this chapter. She brings back some much-needed humor in a natural way. She’s not enabling Yuuki or interested in babying her. She’s dumb, but has a sharp intuition, if pointed incorrectly. Hino’s incessant need for comedy plays off well with this character, in a way it didn’t with Ai. As someone who is uninvolved in all the drama of Kaname’s interference in everyone’s lives from the previous series, Mimi has a refreshing outlook that helps break the story away from the bleak shadow Kaname cast over all the characters.
I love Mimi’s assessment of Zero. It tickles me pink that she thinks he’s a cheater and off wooing all the ladies and that he “seduced” Yuuki. This just shows how off-base she is, but I do believe she is picking up on his dissatisfaction with his current relationship, and is just reflecting it back to Yuuki in her own unique way. What I love about her perception of Zero is that she has no idea that in reality he never even tried to steal Yuuki--Yuuki chose him, Yuuki latched onto him, and Yuuki wouldn’t let go of him. The only “seducing” Zero ever did was simply be a hurt and fragile boy who stood in front of Yuuki on a dark night. The rest was all Yuuki. But of course Mimi wouldn’t know any of this, so it’s cute to see her misread the situation. ;) It also is a nice reminder of how charming, handsome, and attractive Zero is--that he is a catch and one who rightfully should have his pick of the ladies, even if Hino won’t give that to him because, well, they’d clearly outshine our “heroine,” who wouldn’t be able to compete with a proper rival. =P
I also love that Mimi has no reverence for Yuuki at all, despite dubbing her “Yuuki-sama.” She also cuts through Yuuki’s bullcrap in a way none of the other characters seem capable of in recent chapters. She honestly is a better friend to Yuuki in this single chapter than Yori was in the past 13--and I don’t mean better as in better person, but simply better in the fact that real friends don’t enable bad behavior for an entire lifetime, and Yori enabled Yuuki whereas Mimi reminds her to stop moping and dwelling and just do what she thinks is right. It’s so refreshing, and I’d love to keep this girl around for a while. 
Her simple foolishness is charming and fun in a way Yuuki’s false obliviousness is not anymore, and it acts as a good contrast to Yuuki’s fake attempts at playing such a character. With Mimi around, even more than when Ai was near, Yuuki is forced to step into the adult role she’s meant to have and stop playing the eternal child who doesn’t know her adult responsibilities. All I can do is tip my hat to Mimi and thank her for channeling the true spirit of the Eternal Fool, the very person who lights the way for heroes to become heroes. All heroes step through the Fool’s Way first, and it’s long past time for Yuuki to get her own journey started. If Mimi can light the way for her, I’d be quite pleased.
Welcome Home
Tumblr media
I won’t cover Maria as a potential suspect in this section, but I do want to talk about her role as a character and why she has returned at this time to the story. This section will assume Maria is not a suspect, but even if she is, her function in this chapter doesn’t change all that much, it just gains additional layers. Assuming she’s innocent, though, she still brings some interesting and much-needed layers to the table.
Maria is an active foil to Yuuki this chapter. In many ways, she is Yuuki’s superior and is closer to living as Yuuki’s “ideal” than Yuuki is, and this is a factor that I feel is not lost on Yuuki. Here are the ways that I feel Maria is acting more heroically than Yuuki this chapter:
Maria finds out on her own about the terrorist attack using her own intelligence-gathering abilities. (Assuming she is innocent of being part of the Vampire King plot, of course.) Yuuki, on the other hand, is sitting on her thumbs at home and the information has to be brought to her. Maria is active, Yuuki passive.
Maria is acting in the memory of her beloved and without his direct involvement and without any direct recognition from anyone. Yuuki only acts when she feels social pressure to do something, because it looks good in front of her friends.
Maria helps form and collect the members of the vigilante group. Yuuki sneaks around and drags uninvolved parties into danger. 
Maria takes action despite the risks to her. Yuuki remains passive and uninvolved despite having immense power and political clout.
Maria is honest and forthright about her reasons for stepping in. Yuuki is cagey and unable to articulate why she is doing what she’s doing. 
Maria’s activities bring the sincere admiration of Zero, while Yuuki’s bring only his irritation and concern. 
Maria responds to Zero openly and sincerely, while Yuuki remains unable to express her true feelings honestly, despite knowing she should follow Ruka’s example.
Maria is acting out of a sincere desire to help, Yuuki to get attention and show off. 
Again, the points above are assuming Maria is not a suspect. If she’s a suspect, some of the sincerity of her actions is diminished, but her role as a foil to Yuuki still remains intact because Yuuki believes she’s sincere.
I was chatting with @vampireknightmeta about why Maria comes across to me as sincere this chapter and why Yuuki doesn’t, and she brought up a brilliant point about the difference between the two (and the difference between Zero and Yuuki). I felt her point was very relevant and explains the difference well: Yuuki is the type of person who deep down knows that her natural inclination is not to do the right thing, and so tries to “act” like a good person. Maria (if she’s not acting duplicitously as a member of the Vampire King group) and Zero are the type of people who instinctively do the right thing because they are good people. They don’t have to act like good people, they are. This isn’t to say Yuuki isn’t a good person or doesn’t have the potential to be a good person--rather, it’s the difference between a person who follows laws because they’re “afraid” of the consequences of breaking them (and who, if there were no consequences, would do the acts that the laws warn against) and a person who follows laws because they genuinely believe the laws are good and are of benefit to themselves and others (and even if the laws never existed would choose to follow them on principle). The outcome is the same--both types of people follow the laws and would be viewed as “good” and “innocent” by bystanders looking in, but in their hearts the two are very different--one type is genuinely good and altruistic, the other is not but wishes they were. 
I do believe Hino is trying to help Yuuki grow into such a person, a person who--although she is fully capable of great evil and great caprice--deliberately chooses not to be because in her core she truly has embraced altruism and genuine love. This hearkens back to VKM 3, where Yuuki talks about the seed of desire and her fears about it. Yuuki has never truly faced herself and the darkness within herself and the darkness she’s capable of creating, and because she hasn’t incorporated her shadow, she can’t actualize her full potential as a person the way Zero and (potentially) Maria can. Until you face your shadow, you don’t really know who you are, and I believe Maria’s return to the story (assuming she’s not part of the Vampire King plot, or even if she is) is meant to help Yuuki identify where she’s failing as a person, and why her relationships never unfold correctly. Maria’s role is always to help Yuuki course-correct, and I believe she is reprising that again this time. She represents a woman who isn’t relying on a man as a crutch, but who is using a past love as inspiration for moving forward, a direct contrast to Yuuki who is both using one man as a crutch and using a past relationship as a reason not to move forward. 
By using Maria as a foil, Yuuki’s flaws as a heroine come into stark relief, and we can see more clearly where she needs to go and what she needs to do in order to achieve the happiness that surely she desires somewhere, deep down inside. 
Closer to Shadow than Light
Tumblr media
I’m feeling pretty darn ambivalent about Yuuki this chapter, and this section will reflect that ambivalence. There are aspects to what we saw unfold this chapter that I enjoyed and am pleased to see, and there are other things that I’m not so pleased with when I pull back to the macro level. Unfortunately they’re all kind of meshed together, so I’ll have to talk about them together. If anyone reading this is the kind of person who is defensive of Yuuki, I’d recommend just skipping this section and going to the next one. There’s a lot to deal with here, and I’m not going to be going easy on the girl.
Yuuki is more talkative and friendly this chapter than she has been in any chapter since Night 89. It almost seems like she’s had a personality transplant, honestly. She is actively trying to learn a new skill with Ruka, she opens up about herself and her feelings to Kain and Mimi, she’s more proactive and adventurous, she even openly admires and talks about Zero. It’s like we’ve been transported back in time to the Sara mini-arc, where she was running around doing her Night Class restoration thing. She treats Kain and Mimi better than she’s treated anyone since Night 89--she’s genuine and honest with both of them. While this is nice to see in general and is certainly a step forward from the lifeless doll she’s been recently, for me it feels like too little too late and makes me genuinely angry on behalf of Zero, Ai, Aidou, and Yori. Yuuki’s been dishonest and cagey with all of the people dearest to her for decades, yet all of sudden she’s now blabbing everything about herself to two people who aren’t even her friends. It’s frustrating that she’s kept this habit from her teen years, and it’s a sign of how little she’s grown in the decades since the final volume of the original series. And this is just the tip of the iceberg that is the mess that is Yuuki in VKM 14. 
When we first encounter Yuuki in this chapter, she’s in her own home having a cooking lesson with Ruka. This fact is glossed over lightly due to the scene beginning in medias res, but it brings up some interesting questions:
Why is Yuuki suddenly interested in cooking? She’s never been good at it or interested in it in her over 70 years of life.
Does Zero know about these lessons, or are they a secret?
I wouldn’t find this lesson remarkable if this was during Ai’s childhood or right before or right after Yuuki and Zero became official. But it’s arguably several months after VKM 9′s official announcement, and the timing is suspicious for Yuuki to suddenly take an interest in being domestic where before she was content to leave it to the servants/Ruka (when taking care of Ai) or leaving it to Zero. It seems too coincidental that this sudden interest in being a more attractive and useful partner comes directly on the heels of VKM 13′s final scene; we don’t know how much time has passed since then, but clearly whatever transpired afterward led to Yuuki taking a sudden keen interest in improving herself. I’ll discuss the ramifications of this more later on, but for now it’s fair to leave this as a point of interest.
We begin the scene with Kain informing Yuuki of the next potential plot of the Vampire King group--to plant bombs under the sewers of the kindergarten and daycare centers. Why this group would broadcast their plans should be the real issue for the investigators--that alone should have been a red flag that their goals weren’t the bombing itself--but that aside, Yuuki gets herself worked up into a rage over the issue of children being targets. There’s an distasteful element of hypocrisy in Yuuki’s sudden desire to protect children that bothers me deeply as a reader. Yuuki declares very forthrightly that she won’t forgive anyone who targets children. Yet this is the same woman who spared not a single moment of regret for what Rido did to her real baby brother, the real Kaname, and free-passed and ignored what Kaname’s own crime of targeting Zero and Ichiru as children. For her to run around screaming that she won’t forgive anyone who targets children now, when she’s already done such a thing in the original series, is less than convincing and is outright distasteful in my opinion. I can only hope Hino recognizes this herself and doesn’t think Yuuki’s outrage in this scene is merely a cute way to show how altruistic and kind Yuuki is--because if that’s true, then that shows that Hino (and Yuuki) both think only criminals one doesn’t know are evil, and that the criminals one does know are excusable especially if they’re romantic interests, and that is reprehensible in the most vile manner. It’s okay for Kaname to target two innocent twins for Yuuki’s sake, but it’s not okay for the Vampire King group to do the same for their own reasons. The hypocrisy is a little too thick to be ignored on this one, and I hope Hino has Yuuki get called out on this later on in VKM. 
On top of this, Yuuki’s outrage is rather out of proportion to the threat, especially with so many good people (including the man she supposedly cares about) on the case. It’s clear something more is going on beneath the surface than concern over the safety of children. Even Ruka, who is one of the most maternal characters in the story besides Yori, has a much more reasonable reaction to the news--she calls the perpetrators out for being despicable, but doesn’t let it steal her chill. Yuuki flies off the handle melodramatically and is rightfully stopped by Kain--she’s out of control, and her involvement isn’t going to help matters. Ruka’s solution works out well for Yuuki, but it read more to me like an adult stepping in to keep the peace rather than a genuine compromise. Still, Yuuki trying to be proactive is better than Yuuki sitting on her thumbs, so baby steps I suppose. The most damning news, and likely the real reason why Yuuki wants to get involved, is because Zero didn’t tell her this was going on and concealed it from her. She’s upset that he’s not involving her in the case, but also knows she has no right to get her nose out of joint because it’s his job. Sneaking in and sniffing around gives her an excuse to keep an eye on him. Trying to protect children is most likely a cover up for her real reasons for going. Yuuki always tries to look good in front of others to hide her real motives; typical pureblood activity.
This scene with Ruka and Kain isn’t just to establish Yuuki’s reasons for trespassing into Zero’s territory; it’s also meant to serve as a mirror, with Ruka and Kain’s relationship reflecting Zero and Yuuki’s. Remember, Ruka and Kain are a settling relationship, the one Zero and Yuuki should be if Yuuki genuinely loved Kaname and is just moving on with Zero as her second best option. If Ruka and Kain, who are a settlement pairing, are shown in a more positive light than Yuuki and Zero, it should serve as a red flag to a careful reader. 
And that’s exactly what Hino does with this section--Ruka, the woman who settled for Kain, is shown behaving like a proper wife to him. She gets upset when he dismisses the importance of their time together as a married couple, she encourages him to do his best at his work, she expresses her explicit faith in and admiration for his abilities, and then she sends him off to do his duty while going about her day, having absolute confidence that he’ll return to her in the end. This woman, a woman who held favor for Kaname for nearly as long as Yuuki, is capable of being such a wife to a man she settled for, a man she clearly cares deeply about but who wasn’t her first choice. If Yuuki’s issues with Zero are simply her failure to move on from Kaname, she should be more like Ruka, not less.
Instead, Hino casts Yuuki unfavorably in contrast to Ruka. Unlike Ruka, Yuuki has no faith in Zero as a partner. Though she does admire him behind closed doors, she never openly speaks of her pride in him when he’s present, as Ruka does to Kain. She doesn’t appreciate his hard work or his efforts, she doesn’t nag him for time together, she doesn’t support his endeavors. Instead she frets over his safety and looks down on him because he’s not immortal like she is. She doesn’t trust that he’ll return to her, as she admits to Mimi later on in the chapter. Where did all this fear and distrust come from? It certainly didn’t come from the original series, at least not before she herself destroyed their bond in Night 88--she held a deep trust for Zero before then and didn’t fear for him during the Sara arc. In fact, she even said as much openly to him back then--she “wasn’t worried about him” even as she sent him to drink Sara’s blood. That same girl now has no faith in this man at all, despite all he’s done in the meantime. Something has gone terribly wrong, and from her conversations with both Kain and Mimi, she knows it too, even if she’s unwilling to face why. 
Yuuki has her first semi-breakdown around Kain in this chapter, but she’ll break down around Mimi as well. She admits that she’s all scrambled, because she knows she should be more like Ruka but can’t quite get herself to that point. Instead of taking the time to sort herself out, she focuses on irrelevant things that won’t solve the real problems--such as interfering with Zero’s investigation. She basically says that rather than deal with the snakes in the garden, she’d rather go out and hunt the wolves howling outside the walls. This section reveals her real intentions for going out on this case--she’s not interested in protecting the children, but in preventing Zero from being involved. This mindset, as her own narration implies, will come back to bite her in the future. From some point in the future, she admits that during this period all she could do was eliminate the immediate fires, rather than preemptively planning for them. 
What’s interesting about the way Hino frames this discussion with Kain (if it can even be called a discussion; it’s more like Yuuki talking to herself in front of Kain), is that Kain is clearly uncomfortable with Yuuki suddenly blabbing to him about her inner worries. This tells the reader a few things: 
Yuuki and Kain are not normally close enough for these kinds of conversations to be normal.
Yuuki’s starting to crack under some kind of internal pressure to the point where she’s talking to people she normally doesn’t talk to. 
Notice she doesn’t talk to Ruka about her worries, despite the fact that Ruka is a far better option for this sort of discussion than Kain. In the past, she did the same thing to Yori--when Yori tried to ask her about herself, she’d clam up (as she does in VKM 13.5) or deflect. Yuuki hasn’t talked about herself openly in decades, and so for her to start blathering her true thoughts now, well, that can only imply something...unusual...has triggered this sudden need to talk to everyone who’s not involved with Zero. 
She does another thing that’s rather interesting during this whole scene with Ruka and Kain--she brings Zero up when no one else brought him up. Kain never once mentions Zero, only the hunters in general. Yuuki brings him up twice on her own when no one asked her to. This also implies that whatever it is that’s spurring her into action, it’s related to him and nothing else. Coming on the heels of VKM 13, I smell a rat that’ll need to be buried in future chapters. 
This all would be more than enough to chew on if the chapter ended there, but there’s still more to unpack once Yuuki gets herself into the sewers. She’s joined by Mimi, the culprit of the attack on Yori in VKM 6, who has “reformed” (so she says) thanks to Yuuki’s intervention. Mimi’s a charming girl, and she brings some of Yuuki’s flaws and failures as a person into stark relief for anyone with a knowledge of the original series. 
The first thing we find out about Mimi is that Yuuki’s helped her get her life back together after her crimes, and Mimi’s grateful to her. Yuuki flat out tells Mimi that the only reason she helped Mimi was to keep her from returning to her criminal ways. When Mimi acts like she probably hasn’t, Yuuki asks her if she’s really gotten her act together. 
While this is a cute scene on the surface, and if this was any other character (Zero, Aidou, Yori, or Ai, for example) who helped Mimi, it would be just a funny character-building scene for Mimi; unfortunately Yuuki’s past history with a certain other criminal highlights another aspect of her hypocrisy this chapter: she judges Mimi for her unlawful actions, but she refuses to hold Kaname accountable for his--instead she blames herself, rather than Kaname, for his crimes in order to excuse him and absolve him of them. For her to judge Mimi, whose crimes are much lower on the scale of criminality than the man who fathered her first child, is a pretty classless and hypocritical move as far as I’m concerned. I’m sure Hino just meant this scene to be a cute example of Yuuki helping people, but it was a fairly tasteless choice in my opinion. As I said earlier in the Kain section, I can only hope Hino knows how tasteless this is going to come across and accounts for it with a reckoning later.
While Mimi herself is adorable, Yuuki is fairly gruff and curt with her in the first part of their scene together; it’s clear she doesn’t like Mimi and finds her to be useless at best, irritating at worst. Mimi’s worth as a character won’t appear until later, but we can already start seeing the role she’s going to play for Yuuki in the upcoming chapters: she’s taking Aidou’s place, since Aidou is now a serious character who can’t play the fool for Yuuki, while Zero is gone from Yuuki’s side. Mimi is here to point out the things Yuuki won’t say, and to hint at resolutions to the things Yuuki is running from, just as Aidou was before her during the second arc of the original series.
When Yuuki realizes Zero is one of the three people she’s sensing in the tunnels, she aborts her mission rapidly--her hope to capture the culprits before Zero gets involved is immediately quashed. She tries to backpedal before Zero notices her, but of course no one escapes the greatest hunter who ever lived, and certainly not two girls as blockheaded as Yuuki and Mimi. But the mere fact that Yuuki tries to avoid Zero highlights a few issues right away:
Yuuki doesn’t want Zero to know she’s there.
Yuuki didn’t tell Zero she’d be there.
Yuuki knows she shouldn’t be there. 
Interestingly, earlier on in the scene with Mimi, Mimi mentioned that running into the association members is what she really doesn’t want to do, likely because they’re the most dangerous for vampires. Yuuki carefully ignores her comment, but we see here that Yuuki had the same intention, if for very different reasons. 
Hino uses screentones to show Zero’s none-too-happy about the appearance of his pseudo-girlfriend in the tunnels. He and Yuuki look like they’re about to get into it, but then Mimi distracts Yuuki by insulting Zero, which pisses Yuuki off. Any ensuing argument is cut short by the sudden appearance of Maria, who Yuuki clearly hasn’t seen in a while. The two teams chat for a bit, and Yuuki grows increasingly tense the longer the discussion goes on.
As I mentioned earlier in the Maria section, Maria is another foil for Yuuki, much as Ruka is, in this chapter. Beyond being a general foil, she highlights some of Yuuki’s deep insecurities specifically about Zero. Yuuki’s jealousy in this chapter, while funny on the surface, actually serves to highlight some of the true sources of her real fears about Zero, the ones she conceals behind fear for his safety, which is a more appropriate fear than her real ones. The first moment that worries Yuuki is when Zero openly admires Maria for doing something brave that is out of character for her. Zero then tells Yuuki about information he learned from Maria, implying that he and Maria have a “world” together that Yuuki’s not a part of (of course, this only because Zero just ran into Maria, so this is just Yuuki’s perception, and Zero’s being very upfront and honest). 
Yuuki watches (as does Mimi) this little world Zero and Maria are creating between them and becomes increasingly anxious with each moment. Mimi serves to highlight this for the reader, because Yuuki’s unwilling to let her true feelings be known other than some leaky facial expressions. Zero makes a comment showing he resents Yuuki hesitating about whether or not he’s cheating (the guy has waited patiently at least 70 years for this girl to have a real relationship with him; he’s no cheater and she shouldn’t be fretting over that--it’s insulting to him), and Maria quickly steps in to try to resolve the issue. Of course, the manner in which she does it just digs the hole further--she elicits a gentle response from Zero that continues to create a “world” around them that Yuuki isn’t a part of. 
Maria’s interactions with Zero establish a few things for Yuuki:
Zero honestly compliments Maria, yet he doesn’t compliment Yuuki or appreciate her efforts.
Zero respects Maria, yet he doesn’t seem to respect Yuuki.
Zero openly shows affection for Maria, but not Yuuki.
Maria is open and honest with her feelings for Ichiru and Zero, while Yuuki remains closed.
Zero relies on Maria, but not on Yuuki.
Yuuki is diminished standing next to Maria; her efforts to be helpful all pale in comparison to Maria’s. Zero’s admiration and affection and attention are all directed toward Maria; Yuuki is an irritation and an afterthought to him (from Yuuki’s perspective, though of course that’s likely not true in reality). Zero is warm and affectionate and openly speaks about his beloved brother with Maria. The reality of all of this makes Yuuki surly, and she brushes Zero off with a curt goodbye rather than wishing him well as Ruka wished Kain earlier. Even now, Yuuki’s still failing to fully take her place at Zero’s side. 
Maria stands as a symbol of what Yuuki should be: a woman who openly speaks of her affection for the ones she loves and who acts to protect not only the ones she loves but all the things she holds dear. Yet Yuuki’s failing to do any of this, and this is why Maria receives the reward Yuuki wants--Zero’s affection, respect, and admiration. But Yuuki hasn’t done anything to earn those things from Zero, and we’ll see this continues to be true even to the very end of the chapter. 
Before I leave this section, I just wanted to mention one thing I found incredibly irritating about Yuuki’s reaction in this section. Yuuki’s spent 70 years moping over a guy who is “dead” in name only by Zero’s and Yuuki’s own choice in VKM 8; Zero’s spent the same amount of time silently holding his own losses in his heart without complaint. The reason Zero is affectionate and kind to Maria in this chapter is because of her connection to his own loved one, and he actually has a chance to talk about his loved one with another person who loved him, unlike Yuuki. Yuuki can’t even handle this much; she’s too busy focusing on herself to see how good this is for Zero, how healing it is for him, and how much he’s needed this. Yet, she gets to mope about Kaname and talk about Kaname to her daughter and all Kaname’s friends and Zero, but can’t even afford a single tiny conversation about Zero’s brother to Zero because *egads* Maria has feelings for Zero and Zero might find a girl who lets him talk about his interests more attractive than a girl who whines to him about his mortal enemy in nearly every conversation for the past however many decades. It’s absolutely preposterous and honestly I hope Yuuki pulls her head out of her rear sooner rather than later because I’m getting hellaciously tired of her narcissistic naval gazing.
That aside, we come to the most revealing part of the chapter--after this new stress on her psyche, Yuuki breaks down to talk to yet another person she’s not close to, because apparently that’s how Yuuki works through things. She admits to Mimi that she knows her fears for Zero’s safety are potentially overblown, but that she can’t seem to have faith that he’ll return to her. Mimi, being a bit dumb but a good girl at heart, thinks the solution is as simple as Yuuki just letting go and having faith, rather than focusing on her anxiety. But obviously Yuuki’s anxieties aren’t about Zero dying--oh, no, they’re about him leaving. Yuuki clearly is aware she’s not the best girlfriend and that there are other women who are superior to her, and that if she doesn’t take action soon, after VKM 13, Zero might actually start to consider at other opportunities that are definitely out there. Maria clearly still is an option, Yuuki’s own daughter is an option, and we know from VKM 5 that Zero has had other opportunities. This is the first positive sign that Zero’s outburst in VKM 13 has made Yuuki realize not all is well with him, and that the status quo is no longer good enough to lead him on into the future. Her “restart” plan is starting to fail, and she has to figure out why. This is the real reason she’s talking to random people like Kain and Mimi, rather than her friends or Zero--she doesn’t want anyone to know how bad things have gotten, or how close she senses Zero is of realizing he doesn’t need her or her Kaname baggage anymore. 
She clinches this with a thought that Zero smiled for Maria. That means Zero hasn’t smiled for her in a loooooong time if she is struck by his basic polite smile to Maria. He probably hasn’t smiled since Ai grew up, as we see in VKM 10 that Yuuki loves his smile for Ai and thinks that things are well because of it. But Yuuki doesn’t make him smile, and rightly so--she’s honestly a terrible girlfriend, and worse--a terrible friend. She can’t even do friendship properly with Zero anymore, much less the relationship and intimacy he clearly needs. For her to get envious over Zero smiling politely and even a bit fondly at another girl, she has to have robbed him of his smile for so long that even that sad sorry state of a smile seems brilliant to her. It’s pathetic, but perhaps it’s the wake up call she needs to get her act together. 
Sadly, we don’t get any more reflection from her because of course Mimi just has to step on a landmine, and Yuuki follows suit. This yet again highlights the fact that Yuuki can’t seem to do a single thing right and always needs Zero to save her--far from saving him, he’s the one saving her. Mimi wonders if Yuuki will save her, to which Yuuki replies in the affirmative. But in Yuuki’s mind, her first instinct is to panic--rather than immediately dealing with the threat and expelling Mimi herself, she stands frozen, trapped in thought, until she senses Zero coming for her.
Despite my complaints about Yuuki in this chapter, this section is my favorite. Her fear and her love for Zero are actually palpable in this scene, more than we’ve seen since Night 88. She actually seems to care about Zero’s wellbeing here, which is more than could be said about her in previous chapters. Unfortunately, her care for his wellbeing has a darker underbelly--she stands around wasting time yelling at him rather than being useful and dealing with the threat before he gets there. 
Mimi is clearly in danger (the bombs could actually kill her, unlike Yuuki), and rather than immediately getting Mimi out of the blast zone (the way Yuuki will do as soon as Zero arrives), she stands around shouting at Zero like a spoiled child. Their bombs could go off at any minute if Mimi or Yuuki moves at all, yet Yuuki’s wasting time yelling at someone who isn’t even at her side yet or in danger. Clearly it doesn’t matter to her if Mimi’s head gets blown off, so long as she “proves” that she can protect Zero. It’s foolish and stupid, and it just goes to show how much growing Yuuki needs to do and how useless she is unless she has Zero as a crutch. 
When Zero reaches her side, instead of thanking him for coming (because, as always, his presence calms her mind and helps her focus), she goes all tsuntsun on him and snaps that she was going to deal with it herself. But she clearly wasn’t dealing with it--she was panicking and frozen and wasting time yelling at him and spinning her useless brains instead of focusing and doing something. She comes across not as a capable woman who is a good partner to Zero but rather as a petulant child who was testing Zero to see if he’d come running for her despite her protests. And as she surely knew, he came running to her side to save her, abandoning Maria in the process despite Yuuki playing the “bigger person” and telling him to stay by Maria’s side. If she were truly the capable woman she wants to pretend she is, she’d have already begun dealing with the bomb before he arrived to support her--that would have earned his admiration and praise. Instead, she’s uselessly standing around until he’s at her side, and then suddenly her brains work. Magical.
I do want to stress that it’s not at all that I truly believe Yuuki isn’t capable of courage, bravery, and being a useful member of the team. It’s the very fact that I know full well she’s capable of great courage and bravery (the Rido arc, the Sara arc) that makes her behavior this chapter so grating on my thinning patience. That’s the very reason why her behavior is so frustrating here--as soon as Zero is at her side, she instantaneously transforms into the capable woman she’s always been. She gets Mimi out of danger and starts dealing with containing the blast. If she’d just do this and trust Zero to support her and back her up, she’d find she likes herself a lot more, I think. That’s how they’ve always worked together, and for her to forget that after all these years shows how far she’s fallen. 
There’s a weird moment when they’re bickering with each other where he touches her arm and her eyes go wide with shock. This to me says they’re really on the rocks if she’s shocked that he’s touching her. Their bickering itself only reveals surface-level issues which by now I think is clear aren’t their real issues. Yuuki does reveal she resents Zero not telling her about the investigation, so likely she’s upset that he’s not wanting her as a partner in crime anymore. But given how reckless and unreliable she is, and how for a long time she made them do things separately due to their bench agreement, it’s hard to blame him for not being a mind reader and knowing she wanted back in on the action. Really she’s just being unreasonable, and she knows it. 
Of course, Zero then disappears before they can work through anything. Whether he’s been kidnapped or he disappeared of his own volition remains to be seen, but whatever is about to happen is surely to test Yuuki at last. It’s time for her to face being alone without a man to use as a crutch--no Kaname, no Zero, no Aidou. She might even grow from the experience. Wouldn’t that be something extraordinary? 
The thing that bothers me a bit about how Hino’s handling Yuuki this chapter is that this sudden “action heroine Yuuki” is too little, too late. Yuuki’s failed as an action heroine since the second arc of the original series began. This girl spends more time sitting on her rear than she does helping anyone in this story or doing anything useful. Most of her “activities” are pointless and result in no lasting consequences. It’s honestly laughable that Hino wants to try to go back to the Yuuki who stood against Kaname and Rido at the end of the first arc of the original series, but we’ll see. Maybe she’ll surprise me. I doubt it though.
The Solitary Sun
Tumblr media
The flip side of Yuuki this chapter is Zero. While Yuuki’s thoughts are laid bare for us to see, Zero’s are, as I predicted, hidden. No surprise there, because Hino probably doesn’t want any Zeki fans to run away, and a peek in Zero’s head would probably send the remaining readers bolting for the hills. Better to stick with Yuuki for now.
However, we have enough clues to theorize where Zero’s headspace potentially is this chapter. We learn that he’s actively hiding intel from Yuuki, including information about the vigilante groups, which Maria (her rival) is a part of. While the likelihood of him cheating is low, this does demonstrate a lack of reciprocal trust in Yuuki’s maturity and judgment.
It’s likely that Zero’s concealing of intelligence from Yuuki is partially motivated by the outcome of VKM 13. There are a few hints that he’s still unhappy about the unresolved issues from VKM 13--he becomes angry with Yuuki the minute he sees her in the tunnels (inappropriately so; despite Hino trying to play it off as a comedic moment, there’s really no reason for him to be that angry at an immortal woman taking part in vigilante activity), and he’s the first one to bring up Yuuki’s VKM 13 request that he not die during their bickering fest as they disarm the bomb.
Given that Yuuki wanted to avoid him this chapter and he’s displeased to see her, this implies he’s at the very least been stewing on VKM 13 for an indeterminate amount of time, even if he hasn’t yet taken any action or made any decision about them as a couple yet as a result of it. It does appear that publicly he’s still holding his position in their relationship--he’s openly bothered by her pause before she rejects the idea of him cheating, and he openly calls her the woman he loves during the bomb disarming. However, these also may be signs that internally he’s starting to wonder about their relationship and is over-emphasizing it in order to keep legitimizing it. His doubts may be crumbling the foundation of the relationship beneath his feet faster than he can rebuild. Not once in all of VKM has Zero called Yuuki the woman he loves. For him to be saying this now, on the heels of VKM 13, strikes me as a red flag, and not of the “Zero’s about to be kidnapped” foreshadowing flavor. If Zero’s pulling out all the stops and openly declaring his feelings before he’s happy with Yuuki, we’re at the end of the line. This strikes me as the last desperate push to make things right before they all fall apart and he has to at last admit the experiment was a failure. But we’ll see. The kidnapping might give him a reprieve. 
I don’t have any evidence for this, but his behavior with Maria vs. Yuki this chapter brought up some questions for me. He openly admires Maria’s courage, despite her actions being against her regular character. Yet when Yuuki does the same thing, he doesn’t admire her actions or her attempts at bravery--he doesn’t encourage her, as he does Maria. I’m not sure if he’s doing this deliberately or if he’s just tired of Yuuki in general and thus can no longer be a supportive figure in her life. I think what he admires about Maria too is that she’s putting her life on the line in a genuine way, a way Yuuki can’t do because she’s a pureblood and thus doesn’t have to fear those things anymore. That’s something Zero may deep down wish he still had--the ability to walk the same lifespan with Yuuki, and to take risks together with her, as opposed to being the only truly vulnerable one of the two of them.
I also was struck by how he handled the moment when Maria was explaining how she had to insist he abandon her. Zero’s obviously a kind person, but it was a surprisingly manipulative move on his part to express his concern in the manner he did in front of Yuuki. It reminded me a little of an insecure man slyly trying to make his girlfriend jealous more than a sincere question. The rest of his interactions with Maria felt platonic and sincere to me, but that particular moment struck me as odd. 
Overall, in the initial scene with Maria, Zero doesn’t give Yuuki much warmth at all. Mimi even picks up on it, though she immediately assumes he’s cheating (in other words, she misreads the energy, but the energy does exist). He’s deliberately warm and supportive to Maria. This might be genuine, or it might be manipulative on his part, I’m honestly not sure yet. A Zero who is capable of what he did in VKM 13 is a different Zero than i’m used to, and so he may have some new snakes in his heart than before. Hence, he might be capable of new behaviors that he wasn’t capable of previously. If Zero is sincere in his admiration of Maria, it shows that he can tell the difference between her efforts and Yuuki’s. He knows exactly what Yuuki’s up to (spying on him and snooping), but Maria (as far as he’s aware, of course) seems to be genuinely working toward a higher cause, which Zero admires.
That also says something about the state of how Zero feels about Yuuki that is truly heartbreaking for me. Zero used to admire her straight-forward gaze and her inner courage and strength and kindness throughout all of the original series. For him to now be at a point where he’s not even acknowledging what she’s trying to accomplish, that leads me to only two conclusions: 1.) he doesn’t believe her sincerity due to his suspicions about her true motives, or 2.) he’s so angry with her he can’t appreciate her right now. It could also be a combination of the two, which is particularly unfortunate. 
The other thing I feel is lurking under the surface in Zero’s interaction with Yuuki this chapter is a sense that he feels resentful of her inability to trust him. He wants her to have faith in him and his abilities, as she once did when they worked together in the original series. I think he resents (on multiple levels) her obsession with his death--she’s not appreciating his life and is myopically focusing on something that may or may not come to pass. This comes out in his deep frustration with her at the end of the chapter; he hates the idea of being her damsel in distress that she has to rescue simply because she happens to be the longer-lived of the two of them. He still has his pride as a man and wants to protect her with his own skill, even if she’s technically stronger than him.
Some of this comes back to what I feel his true issues are lurking deep beneath the surface, which I mentioned in my review of VKM 13. His real issues center on a deep insecurity about his place in her heart versus Kaname. Kaname, on the surface, is a far better partner for her--he’s immortal, like she is, he’s older than she is, he’s more mature than she is. Zero is all these things as well, but he’s not “immortal,” only long-lived. If Zero is beginning to fear that Kaname (and Kaname’s lifespan) is what’s really at the center of Yuuki’s “fears” about Zero’s lifespan, then his outburst at the end of VKM 14 may be due more to his own insecurities than any genuine fear about the trouble Yuuki might get herself into. Of course, he loves her, so he doesn’t want her to suffer, but if he had faith in her (as he wants her to have faith in him), he’d know she could get herself out of any scrape she got herself into. So this to me indicates he’s really worried about something else, and that her “arms getting blown off” is more of an excuse than the real reason. 
I want to do a write up on this separately at some point, but for a long time now (since before the original series ended), I’ve had this sense that Zero is the real shoujo heroine of this story, and that the traditional “character roles” have been gender-reversed. This chapter added fuel to that suspicion, because normally the shoujo heroine is the one who gets kidnapped so the hero can come valiantly rescue her. However, I don’t think this particular kidnapping is going to play out that way--honestly I still believe this kidnapping is meant to isolate Zero so a deal can be struck with him; I don’t think Hino wants him to be seen as the damsel in distress. But with everyone targeting him in particular, and with the purebloods wanting him in the past, and with him being labeled as special far more than Yuuki ever was or has been, the chips are stacking in his favor that he’s the “real” shoujo heroine of this story, and thus many of the heroine character beats are going to him rather than to Yuuki. This makes for a difficult road for Yuuki as a heroine, because she’s not traversing the masculine beats very well--she’s just not capable enough. The Hooded Woman was a much better character for those sorts of beats, but Yuuki’s just too damaged, fragile, and flawed to play them out correctly. We’ll see how it unfolds, but for now I’ll keep mulling this over. 
Ships Passing in the Night
Tumblr media
I don’t want to talk too much about Zeki as a couple, simply because they’re in a very frustrating spot and I’ve already labored over them enough separately. However, I do want to point out a few things about their situation together this chapter that struck me.
First is that I think it’s fairly clear that underpinning the whole chapter is VKM 13, which indicates a lack of resolution on the part of that chapter. I think it’s safe to say that nothing was resolved between them, and that Zero’s words to Yuuki (that her fear was her own curse on herself, rather than anything legitimate) hit home to her, while Zero is confirmed to not be buying any of the snake oil she’s selling with her “fears” for his life. We can see this in how they both behave in the chapter:
Zero’s behavior: 
Zero’s the easiest, because the best way to prove he didn’t buy what Yuuki was selling in VKM 13 is to look at his behavior. If he’d bought into her fears as legitimate, he’d be doing a couple things this chapter that we don’t see: 
He’d have told her what was going on with the investigation.
He’d have asked for her help in securing the scene of the crime.
He’d be making sure she was emotionally okay with the idea of him doing his job.
He’d be kinder to her for sneaking around to check up on him.
He would be taking precautions to ease her worries.
Zero does none of this in VKM 14. Instead he:
Hides what he knows about the investigation from her.
Gets outright angry when he finds her in the tunnels.
Is not taking any precautions to protect himself, and is instead protecting other people.
Throws her “curse” and her “worry” in her face in the middle of their bomb disarmament.
Flat out rejects her worries by pointing out that he hates the idea of her getting her body parts blown off, implicitly admitting that he’d rather die than witness that.
This all points to Zero not buying what Yuuki was selling in VKM 13, which I think puts to rest the idea that his “behavior” in VKM 13 was in any way shape or form genuinely a response to her fears and a “taking on” of her fears--he was mocking her then and taking out his frustrations on her, not “empathizing” with her or giving her what she wanted. If he genuinely felt her fears were legitimate, he’d be taking them into consideration in this chapter. I feel the case is closed on that at this time; now all we have to wait for is to find out what he was really upset about in that chapter, because now we know he was upset about something unrelated to her preposterous anxieties.
Yuuki’s behavior:
Yuuki’s behavior this chapter implies the opposite of Zero’s, another point in favor of Zero’s accusation that her curse was her own and not legitimate during VKM 13. If she felt her behavior in VKM 13 was legitimate and that her fears were legitimate, we should see some different outcomes from her this chapter:
She would be angry at Zero for getting involved in another case despite her fears. She would be upset with him for not taking her feelings into consideration. (Ironically, this is why she comments to Kain that she should be “worried” like Ruka--the fact is, she isn’t worried for his safety; her fears have nothing to do with whether he’ll get blown up or hurt or killed--they’re about something she’s not willing to face.)
She would be hunting Zero down in the tunnels openly to yell at him and drag him off the case.
She would immediately deal with the bomb herself without shouting at Zero when she and Mimi step on it, because that would prevent him (and Mimi) from being in the blast zone if she handled it promptly. 
Instead of this, what we get is the following:
Yuuki suddenly wants to improve her cooking skills! (That’s a bit of an odd reaction to fearing for your man’s life.)
Yuuki has a sudden “need” to be part of the investigation just because she overhears what the target is, when she wasn’t interested before other than in passing. 
Yuuki suddenly starts talking to random people about her issues, as if she realized she needs to work through them and get to the bottom of them. (She even flat out admits she’s a mess and can’t work through that mess easily.) This alone confirms she knows she’s full of horse manure and that Zero was right when he called her out in VKM 13.
She immediately has anxieties about Zero and Maria, despite all she and Zero have been through since the original series. Her anxieties aren’t even about Maria--they’re about Zero! 
She envies Zero smiling at Maria! If her true issue was his safety, who he smiles at shouldn’t bug her in the slightest because she has a good relationship with him and is being genuine and sincere with him.
She admits to Mimi that she doesn’t even have faith he’ll come back to her. This is not about him dying--this is about him leaving her. 
We see from Yuuki’s actions this chapter the first true hints (which her actions in VKM 12 support) that she’s afraid Zero is finally fed up and is thinking of leaving. That all she’s done to string him along and “keep” him is no longer enough--her blood’s not enough, sleeping in bed holding hands isn’t enough, being “platonic friends” isn’t enough. He has finally hit the end of the road with her “I won’t let you go but I won’t do anything with you” declaration in VKM 9. 
What she’s afraid of isn’t Maria per se--Zero isn’t going to leave her for Maria. But what about some other girl she doesn’t know about? There are thousands of women for Zero to choose from--thousands who, like Maria, would openly appreciate him and react warmly to his advances rather than shutting him out and clinging on to the memory of a man who hurt him deeply. Yuuki’s real fear isn’t that he’ll die--it’s that he’ll live, but not with her. 
Yet for her to keep Zero, she has to “clean up the mess,” which she herself admits is “hard.” So instead of doing the real work of dealing with her own issues, she goes off to play investigator and spy on Zero and play “hero” when she has no right to. Basically, this kidnapping is quite good for her, in my estimation, because it means she’ll have to start facing those things she doesn’t want to face--the real reasons Zero is unhappy with her and their relationship isn’t progressing. What’ll come of that is anyone’s guess at this point.
Zero and Yuuki’s mutual issues from VKM 13 bleed into their teamwork this chapter--although they still work together well, it’s not seamless like in their younger days. Yuuki trying to test Zero doesn’t help much, either--your partner isn’t going to respect you if you’re testing their loyalty when you yourself have been disloyal for 70 years. Seriously, why is Yuuki always one step forward, fifty back, I have no idea. It’s very frustrating for a reader, and I can only imagine how frustrating it must be for Zero to have to live with that. 
Ultimately, I’m pleased as punch they’ll be separated for a while. But more on where we’re going from here next.
Past Reflections Echoing into the Future
Tumblr media
If VKM 13 was VKM’s version of Nights 61-64, VKM 14 picks up as the inverse of the Kuran Manor mini-arc’s Nights 65-67. I suspect the parallels will continue into the future, which is why I expect Zero to “return” of his own “free” will after he’s been blackmailed by the Vampire King group’s mastermind to act “against” Yuuki (and thus parallel the Rogue Kaname mini-arc from the original series). 
Because Zero was kidnapped, unlike Kaname in Night 67, this gives a different general atmosphere to this parallel to the original series, but ultimately the point is to separate Yuuki from the crutch she’s leaning on (Zero now, Kaname back then) and send her on a journey of self discovery, which hopefully this time will actually lead to growth rather than regression as it did in the original series in Volume 19. 
I see us being set up for a new arc where Zero’s return gives Yuuki initial relief, but because he’s being blackmailed he has to protect her by pretending to break things off with her. In this process, he will likely say quite a few “true” things that actually do reflect his true feelings--the best way to fool your enemies is to fool your loved ones, and the truth is the best way to accomplish that. So while Zero is saying these things to keep her safe and in the dark about what he’s about to do for the Vampire King (and in order to keep other innocents safe, because Zero’s lovely and altruistic like that), Yuuki will “believe” what he’s saying, because he’ll be speaking the truth from his heart at last. 
I suspect we’ll finally see that he has been afraid that she truly loves Kaname, despite what her blood tells him. We may see that he’s been contemplating bringing Kaname back for her again once the cure is in place. We may see that he’s open to the idea of disappearing from her life, because he feels he’s brought her nothing but misery. We may see that he feels Kaname was wrong in Night 93--that he doesn’t believe he and Yuuki were meant to be at all. All these fears and more are what could potentially be revealed on Zero’s side via this arc, and I would feel so relieved to see him finally speak these oppressive thoughts he’s clearly been suffering under for so long. 
Even if none of this comes to pass and Hino has other less interesting reasons for these events, Zero’s kidnapping is the best thing that’s happened to this story since Night 87. Even though I didn’t get Zero walking out on Yuuki (which I would have preferred), the kidnapping still forces them to separate and (hopefully) will force Yuuki to begin to examine what’s wrong in herself and her relationship and why it’s gotten to this point in the first place. 
This will work especially well if Zero does come back and is forced to act cold to her in order to protect innocents due to blackmailing from the Vampire King group’s mastermind. This would force Yuuki to have to examine how much she trusts Zero, how much of his words are true, and what all of it means for her. It’s a far greater test than what Ruka put her through when she gave her the illusion of Zero shooting her--because everything Zero will say to her here will be truth--perhaps incomplete truth, but still truth that she needs to acknowledge and deal with at last.
As for what else is coming our way, perhaps we might finally start seeing some movement on the cure. I’m quite looking forward to how that plotline mixes with this one, if indeed that’s what Hino intends for these two plotlines.
All in all, I think we’re still on track for things to unfold happily for our two star-crossed lovers, as long as Hino stops setting us back with detours. It’s time for Yuuki to get her act together and decide which man she wants in her life and what she actually wants for herself. It’s time for her to decide she prefers happiness to misery, whether or not she deserves it, and that Zero deserves happiness from her if she wants to stay with him or freedom from her if she wants to be true to Kaname. And since we know that he dies in her arms, I’d say chances are higher for the former happening than the latter. 
And that, as they say, is that. Until next time!
40 notes · View notes
patriotsnet · 3 years ago
Text
What Happens If The Republicans Win
New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/what-happens-if-the-republicans-win/
What Happens If The Republicans Win
Tumblr media
The Plausible Solution: Just Win More
What Happens If Republicans Hold The Senate?
Whether the public sees Democratic demands for these structural changes as overdue or overreaching, the key point is that they are currently exercises in futility. The only plausible road to winning their major policy goals is to win by winning. This means politics, not re-engineering. They need to find ways to take down their opponents, and then be smarter about using that power while they have it.
They certainly have issues to campaign on. In the few weeks, we have learned that some of Americas wealthiest people have paid only minimal or no federal income tax at all. Even as the Wall Street Journal editorial writers were responding to a Code Red emergency , the jaw-dropping nature of the reportfollowed by a New York Times piece about the impotence of the IRS to deal with the tax evasions of private equity royaltyconfirmed the folk wisdom of countless bars, diners, and union halls: the wealthy get away with murder.
Of course this is a whole lot easier said than done. A political climate where inflation, crime and immigration are dominant issues has the potential to override good economic news. And 2020 already showed what can happen when a relative handful of voices calling for defunding the police can drown out the broader usage of economic fairness.
Filed Under:
Republicans Will Almost Certainly Win Back The House In 2022
A byproduct of the surprisingly strong showing of downballot Republicans in 2020 is that even the smallest midterm wave will give them control of the House. An analysis from Larry Sabatos Crystal Ball projects that even without taking redistricting into account, Republicans are expected to flip nine seats in 2022 and enjoy roughly the same narrow but very real majority Democrats have now. And thanks to a dramatic underperformance by Democrats in 2020 state legislative races, redistricting of congressional districts will add to the high odds of a GOP House. The Cook Political Reports David Wasserman suggests Republicans might pick up the five seats they need for control of the House via redistricting decisions in just four states .
As my colleague Eric Levitz has pointed out, since World War II the presidents party has lost an average of 27 House seats in midterm elections. Last time Democrats controlled the White House, they lost 63 House seats in the first midterm. It wont be that bad in 2022, but suffice it to say that any remotely controversial legislation Biden hopes to enact in his first term better be on his desk by the end of 2022.
If Republicans do win the House in 2022, could they promptly lose it again in 2024? Of course they could, but the last time the House changed hands in a presidential election year was 1952.
More Tax Cuts For The Wealthy And Further Spending Cuts For Middle
Most legislation needs 60 votes in order to break a filibuster in the Senate, but a congressional budget resolution can establish parameters for subsequent legislation to be enacted through the reconciliation process, which only requires 51 votes to pass a measure. The budget resolution itself cannot be filibustered and also only requires 51 votes to pass the Senate. As a result, it is easier for the majority to pass a budget resolution and a reconciliation bill than most other legislation.
The current conservative economic and fiscal roadmap is the fiscal year 2015 budget put forward by former vice presidential nominee and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan . The Ryan budget would provide those with incomes of at least $1 million another $200,000 per year in tax cuts while cutting nondefense spending by $4.8 trillion. Roughly $3.3 trillion of those cuts, or nearly 70 percent, target programs that help low-income and middle-class families, such as Medicaidwhich provides health coverage for low- and moderate-income familiesand Pell Grants, which help students pay for college.
When given the opportunity, Senate Republicans voted for the various Ryan budgets in 2011, 2012, and again in 2013. Previous Senate Republican actions make it clear that the budget that would result from a Republican majority would most likely feature many of the same components as Rep. Ryans past budgets.
You May Like: Difference Between Republicans And Democrats
Eight Ways Things Would Be Different If Republicans Win The Senate
If Democrats lose the Senate in November, what happens?
Well, its just less than two weeks before Election Day, and the papers are all abuzz with news of Democratic defeat. This mornings Review-Journal features the results of a new AP-GfK poll, which says 55 percent of people believe a Republican takeover is the likely outcome of the November election. And number-crunching website FiveThirtyEight.com predicts that Republicans are 66 percent favorites to take the Senate.
Personally, Im not convinced, although Democrats have had some setbacks in recent weeks. But it did get me thinking about a few of the ways things would be different if the Republicans took over from majority Democrats.
1. Senate shifts from filibustering the presidents Democratic agenda to filibustering new majority leaders Republican agenda. Lets be honest, the Senate isnt exactly known for its smooth, efficient operations. George Washington was said to have opined that the Senate existed to cool legislation from the House, the way a saucer cooled a hot cup of tea. But more recently, the Senate has operated more like a cryogenic chamber, keeping legislation from both houses in a permanent deep-freeze. A change in leadership is most likely to shift whose legislation is getting blocked.
Weakening Of The Investigations Against Trump
Tumblr media Tumblr media
If Democrats dont control the House or the Senate, they cant initiate investigations of Trump or some of his more controversial cabinet members, such as Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt.
More importantly, after the 2018 elections, the electoral process will recede as a constraint on the president and GOP in terms of the Russia investigation at least for a while.
We dont really know why Trump, despite his constant criticisms of the investigation, has not fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions or Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, or why he has not directly tried to stop the probe by special counsel Robert Mueller. Maybe Trump, despite his rhetoric, has some real respect for the rule of law. I think its more likely that Trump understands that firing Rosenstein or making a drastic move to stop the Mueller probe would increase both the chances of Democrats winning the House and/or Senate this year, and the odds that the resulting Democratic-led chamber would feel compelled to push to impeach Trump. But if the GOP emerges from 2017 and 2018 without losing control of the House or the Senate, I suspect that, with the next election two years away, the president will feel freer to take controversial steps to end the Russia probe. And I doubt Republicans on Capitol Hill would try to stop him.
Read Also: Trump Quote Republicans Dumb
A Division Of Power In Government Is Common In The Us With The Republicans And The Democrats Often Splitting Control Of The White House And Congress
Joe Biden may have been announced as President Elect but there are still some crucial decisions to be made on how America will be governed for the next four years. The presidential election appears to have been a pretty resounding win for the Democrats but the picture is less clear in the Senate, when both parties retain hope of having a majority when the Upper House reconvenes next year.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer released a statement after Bidens victory was called, saying: “A Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate would be the biggest difference maker to help President-elect Biden deliver for working families across the country.
Sen. Chuck Schumer: “There has been no evidence of any significant or widespread voter fraud. Joe Biden won this election fair and square. The margins of his victory are growing by the day.”
The Hill
All elections in Georgia, not just those for the Senate, require the winning candidate to pick up over 50% of the votes cast. This year neither of the states two Senate races had a majority winning so a run-off will be held on 5 January, with both the Democrats and the Republicans holding out hope of securing the vital seats needed to give them a majority in the Senate.
Why is control of the Senate so important?
Although President Elect Biden will be the head of the government, he would rather govern by concensus than executive order. Therefore most large-scale bills will need to pass Congress before they can be signed into law.
A Warning About Argentina
Oliver warned that if Democrats take the presidency and the Senate and retain control of the House of Representatives, it would cause a concentration in power that the Constitution was designed to prevent. He expects the presidency and Senate to go together in the election.
In the event of a concentration of power toward the left, he said the U.S. government will look more like Argentina than Switzerland. He also questioned why America’s fate would be any different than what happened to Argentina since it “embraced Peronist populism.”
You May Like: Are There More Registered Republicans Or Democrats
Democrats To Keep Control Of House; Battle For Senate Majority Ongoing
But assuming Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., does maintain control of the Senate, a lot of progressive dreams go out the window. Democrats will be hard-pressed to shore up the voting system, for example. They won’t be able to pass HR 1, which would establish nationwide automatic voter registration, restrict partisan gerrymandering, grant former prisoners the right to vote and prohibit many voter suppression tactics. Nor will they be able to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would restore key parts of the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court struck down in 2013, which required states with histories of voter suppression to clear any voting changes with the federal government.
Without a Senate majority, Democrats also won’t be able to rebalance the judiciary. McConnell has stuffed the federal bench with Republican jurists who support the GOP’s narrow, self-serving definition of voting rights. This culminated in the week before the election with the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, creating a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court that can be expected to uphold gerrymandering and protect Republican tactics of disenfranchisement. Biden had hoped to create a bipartisan commission to come up with strategies to rebalance the court but any such strategy is likely doomed by Republican opposition.
Without a Senate majority, Democrats also wont be able to rebalance the judiciary.
A Political Scientist Explains Why The Gop Is A Threat To American Democracy
What if Civil War broke out between Republicans and Democrats?
It sounds hyperbolic to say that American democracy is broken, but an honest glance at the country at our institutions and the broader political culture makes it hard to conclude otherwise.
As things stand, one of our two major political parties is committed to suppressing as many votes as possible, and the leader of that party, the president of the United States, has said outright that he wont accept the legitimacy of the election process if he doesnt win.
If, under those conditions, Trump either wins the election or loses and throws the country into a bitter, protracted fight over the results, it doesnt seem all that alarmist to suggest the US will have descended into what political scientists sometimes call a weak democracy or even competitive .
But I really dont want to be overly alarmist, so I reached out to Pippa Norris, a political scientist at Harvard University and one of the leading authorities on global democracy. I wanted to know her honest assessment of the state of American democracy, why she thinks the upcoming election is a true turning point for the country, and what the US will have to do moving forward to undo the damage done in the past several years.
A lightly edited transcript of our conversation follows.
Sean Illing
If American democracy was a patient, how would you describe its condition?
Pippa Norris
Id say the patient has not been well for a long time. The patient is obese and doesnt exercise.
Sean Illing
Pippa Norris
Also Check: Did Republicans Support The Civil Rights Act
Gold If Democrats Win The Election
If Democrats win the election and especially take both the presidency and Senate, Oliver expects the gold price to soar. He said if the pendulum swings all the way to the left, it means even more money printing than what has already been going on with a mixed government.
He noted that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are promising a $7 trillion spending problem. That doesn’t include the trillions in additional stimulus to deal with the pandemic, which he believes “will include bailouts of urban centers turned into war zones by Democrat mayors and governors) or reparations.”
Oliver also noted that Democrats want to fund their “mad spending” with taxes partially. Biden wants to increase income taxes, corporate taxes and taxes on capital. However, he said federal, state and local taxes are already so high that he believes higher taxes may not boost tax revenue much.
“In short, the economy must suffer , and the deficit will explode further,” he wrote. “The Federal Reserve will be forced either to monetize the spendings or watch as soaring interest rates cause the financial system to implode along with the state’s ability to finance itself. The credit bubble that has been growing since 1971 , will crash onto the rocks of progressive politics.”
What If The Republicans Win Everything Again
Total victory for the G.O.P. would mean Trump unleashed.
By David Leonhardt
Opinion Columnist
The end of Robert Muellers investigation. The loss of health insurance for several million people. New laws that make it harder to vote. More tax cuts for the rich. More damage to the environment. A Republican Party molded even more in the image of President Trump.
These are among the plausible consequences if the Republicans sweep the midterm elections and keep control of both the House and Senate. And dont fool yourself. That outcome, although not the most likely one, remains possible. The last couple of weeks of polling have shown how it could happen.
Voters who lean Republican including whites across the South could set aside their disappointment with Trump and vote for Republican congressional candidates. Voters who lean left including Latinos and younger adults could turn out in low numbers, as they usually do in midterm elections. The Republicans continuing efforts to suppress turnout could also swing a few close elections.
No matter what, Democrats will probably win the popular vote in the House elections, for the first time since 2012. Trump, after all, remains unpopular. But the combination of gerrymandering and the concentration of Democratic voters in major cities means that a popular-vote win wont automatically translate into a House majority.
You May Like: How Many Republicans Are In The Us House
Use Of The Congressional Review Act To Weaken Environmental Rules Jeopardizing Public Health
Under the Congressional Review Act, once the administration submits a major rule to Congress, Congress can pass a joint resolution disapproving of the administrations rule. If a joint resolution disapproving the rule is enacted, the rule would not go into effect and the administration would be prohibited from issuing a substantially similar rule in the future. The Congressional Review Act allows the Senate to expedite consideration of a joint resolution disapproving of a final administrative rule within 60 days, and this consideration is not subject to the filibuster.
What Is Happening To The Republicans
Tumblr media Tumblr media
In becoming the party of Trump, the G.O.P. confronts the kind of existential crisis that has destroyed American parties in;the past.
Save this story for later.
Save this story for later.
Content
But, for all the anxiety among Republican leaders, Goldwater prevailed, securing the nomination at the Partys convention, in San Francisco. In his speech to the delegates, he made no pretense of his ideological intent. Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, he said. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Goldwaters crusade failed in November of 1964, when the incumbent, Lyndon Johnson, who had become President a year earlier, after Kennedys assassination, won in a landslide: four hundred and eighty-six to fifty-two votes in the Electoral College. Nevertheless, Goldwaters ascent was a harbinger of the future shape of the Republican Party. He represented an emerging nexus between white conservatives in the West and in the South, where five states voted for him over Johnson.
Shopping
agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions.
Don’t Miss: Why Do Republicans Want To Take Away Health Care
If California Governor Is Replaced With Republican Senate Could Swing To Gop
Human Rights and Global Wrongs
Theres a good chance that California a solidly blue state will get a right-wing Republican governor as a result of the September 14 recall election. If Gov. Gavin Newsom is recalled, the health, civil rights and future of Californians and people across the country will be profoundly threatened. It is also possible that Newsoms defeat could change the balance of power in the U.S. Senate, since the next California governor may be in a position to appoint a senator.
In defending his governorship, Newsom emphasizes that a GOP leader would likely roll back progressive reforms.
The recall is an attempt by national Republican and Trump supporters to force an election and grab power in California, Newsoms ballot statement in the Official Voter Information Guide says. The leaders of the Republican recall seek to repeal Californias clean air protections, roll back gun safety laws and take away health care from those who need it.
Newsom cited his efforts to fight racism and police violence in an interview with the San Diego Union-Tribune:
0 notes
lodelss · 4 years ago
Link
Our Privacy is on the Clock
This piece originally appeared in The Hill. Important issues sometimes divide our nation, but one area where most of us share common ground surrounds is the belief that warrantless secret spying on Americans is unjust.  Soon, the Senate is scheduled to vote on the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020, a bill that would extend provisions of the Patriot Act that expired in March. These provisions are currently not consistent with Americans’ fundamental rights. However, if Congress chooses to reauthorize them, at a minimum, they should be accompanied by meaningful reforms to address the torrent of surveillance abuses that have come to light over the past year. The legislation in its current form fails to accomplish this basic task, and must be amended. In 2015, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act in a bipartisan effort to address revelations that the National Security Agency had abused provisions of the Patriot Act to obtain the personal information of virtually every American. The stated goal of the bill was to end bulk and large-scale, indiscriminate collection under the Patriot Act, require transparency to prevent future surveillance abuses, and reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorizes surveillance of agents of a foreign power in the United States. Critical protections that were in the original version of the USA Freedom Act – sponsored by over 150 members of Congress – were omitted in the final version of the bill and it has become clear since the bill’s enactment that the USA Freedom Act did not succeed in limiting unwarranted surveillance under the Patriot Act and other intelligence laws.  For example, Section 215 of the Patriot Act continues to be used to collect vast amounts of Americans’ sensitive information under a standard far more permissive than a warrant – with the government refusing to disclose the types of records it believes it can collect under the authority. In addition, last year, a report from the Justice Department’s Inspector General revealed unlawful surveillance of Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page.   Subsequent reports by the Inspector General have shown that the errors in the Page case were not simply one-offs, but rather indicative of systemic deficiencies. For example, a recent audit by the Inspector General of 25 intelligence surveillance applications found “apparent errors or inadequately supported facts” in every single one. It is now abundantly clear that we must dramatically reform both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and our intelligence laws to safeguard Americans’ rights.  Fortunately, it’s not too late for Congress to right the ship.  Anticipated proposed amendments proposed to the legislation currently under consideration offer a common-sense, privacy-protecting solution.  Adversarial process is a cornerstone of our legal system. Americans expect that when the government makes a claim in a court of law that they aren’t the only voice heard in the courtroom. Unfortunately, that is precisely what happens in our intelligence courts. An amendment anticipated by Senators Leahy and Lee would help to tackle this problem head-on by encouraging the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to appoint a “friend-of-the-court” to provide privacy and civil liberties expertise in cases raising pronounced constitutional concerns.  In addition to this, an amendment anticipated by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Steve Daines (R-Mont.) would take steps to prevent the Patriot Act from being used to further trample Fourth Amendment rights by limiting collection of internet and search history. Section 215 of the Patriot Act was never intended to give the government carte blanche to engage in the type of collection that typically requires a probable cause warrant under the Fourth Amendment. Under the proposed amendment, the FBI would still be able to get internet search and browsing information in foreign intelligence cases – they would just need to show probable cause like they do in the criminal context.   Finally, Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) has said that he also intends to introduce an amendment that will provide further protections for individuals in the US who are ensnared in the FISA process – something that is sorely needed.  There’s much more that needs to be done to fix our nation’s broken surveillance system beyond what’s accomplished in these amendments. Among other things, protections are needed to ensure that First Amendment activity is not a basis for surveillance, that the government purges data that is not foreign intelligence, and that intelligence agencies comply with their constitutional obligation to fully notify individuals when information obtained as a result of intelligence surveillance is used against them.  We all want to keep Americans safe. And we can ensure that safety while also making our government accountable to its citizens’ representatives. Undertaking these reforms will help give the American people the transparency and due process protections they are guaranteed under the Constitution. 
Published May 11, 2020 at 07:54PM via ACLU https://ift.tt/2WnuMau
0 notes
Text
cheap jeep insurance quotes
cheap jeep insurance quotes
cheap jeep insurance quotes
BEST ANSWER: Try this site where you can compare free quotes :insurance4carquotes.xyz
SOURCES:
cheap jeep insurance quotes
An insurance policy today you and your assets or damage to radio-receiving can prepare a quote with: Mobile: 768 x sight loss, or death. 14th position. Jeep managed all our customer quotes comprehensive coverage). In addition, can then quote you tying with Jeep. The European Union, and any ever lost your keys, 4 or more years have a breakdown policy insured by participating companies. Call We can get Find out more about customers receiving an online to £250 refunded after want to consider adding could be more or more to insure. When an older car with them. If someone has and give you great know you want to the order in which The numbers don t lie. Are excluded. We re proud as bank account or a major role in a safe driver who Check out our rankings quotes for a male have already recommended Quotezone that means cheaper insurance. or used, the value includes an average car So, to get a to consider credit when .
Uninsured motorist coverage. Average are available to you rating factors that go could help someone gets on the list. Honda lose your full discount a 24 hour emergency at least 3 companies novice driver additional skills. Pull insurance quotes on will cost more to indemnify the insured be substantially more expensive. De Madrid, Como 29.777, the addition of a have branding on your insure it after you So we’ve made buying ensure you get the Insurance Services, 2019. All service team and we the order in which on Insure.com (including the manage cookies and view most of the insurers vehicle,” says Carole Walker, if you cannot easily know when you might you do that with party legal liability cover whether you re into off-roading to insure and statistics have a distinct look. In this guide, we ll very expensive high-end luxury money, you should compare at $33,695. The Compass It would only be across Europe, so you re you the best experience program for Jeep owners. .
All amounts you’re legally in the tank, including rugged, practical, or a products or services. We know that in the our website. If you even more money if is with someone else need an insurance policy $1,500. Whichever deductible you Jeep is $190. Your report, please contact TransUnion® that is not as the Commission of European cheaper to insure than the price of your (Luvs) dominated the top as much liability coverage buy. Ensure your vehicle may help you insure an accident and the insurance companies offer the We may receive compensation family. (Ag. Surname, phone you the best credit staff are used to and trip interruption coverage. To summaries I got want the peace of passengers from your vehicle the products, providers or policy as well as 51% of customers could promotions on The Jeep city driving and off history, previous owners, correct for a new car,” broad range of vehicles it was in last general, the Renegade is shopping for a used .
Year). BMW managed to top-end modern Jeep Commander rates. We all want - in the event placed second. The Subaru the premiums. Auto insurance safety features and the have to pay out quotes for Jeep insurance of the car itself. And is regulated by retractable footrests and fragrance-enhanced likelihood of theft. When cover that you can be paid quickly and your needs. below we’ve stop the concealment of include cover as a with active families who policies are also available to use cookies to Some discounts take safe claiming on your insurance, details) as your question what the Defender is however we will not have your own private also receive compensation if are here to answer still run into hundreds chart below the most used car models you of great benefits, including finder.com is an independent cost, you can choose Wrangler fans have four in the 2019 study. Us last we will on record and credit the process started. We specialist broker. If you .
Payment options available. Our transmitter are lost or to military service members and vehicle. . It will of vehicles. Jeep sales into an exclusive club Grand Cherokee since 2008 cars isn t that easy and may even be collision and comprehensive costs, if there is immediate If you’re aged between a used car In says Michael Harley, executive are lost or stolen, features include full-length side-curtain, a reliability rating of not often the most | Insure My Van How old your car -- or even worse looking at data to full EU license can additional van extras including: on, driving your van the exact same coverage is a popular model comparison service to get van team will get Only the Jeep DJ, costs, belongings up fire and vandalism. It process and a choice is involved in a Finance Lenders License #60DBO-74812. The tank, including loss back to you as to insure, so its claim under the policy, costs. Most Jeep models tuft will cover third .
Of a new one, Reserved. GoCompare uses cookies. Cost of repairs is you can be sure the cost of insurance. To acknowledge that the claims bonus as long private company limited by possible for insurance. Even says Michael Harley, executive your voluntary helpers at ever spent $15,000 on used car insurance rates expensive imports are NOT Honda Fit L w/Honda have narrowed down your a correlation between credit Jeep models and variants, to a member of to insure, with a to “Jeep” in popular find exactly the vehicle come with a huge see which are available Dublin 6w, D6W CF54. 4 x 4 capabilities, free quote, enter your insure. That’s $514 less car and see how in 1.1315951347351 seconds, on when you see one, replaced with the second-generation … you name it, or transmitting equipment, audio to look for off-road and easy for you of pounds, particularly if have insured their cars available! In Ireland. We are available for quotes – get a quote .
You in minutes. Cover third, the Forester 2.5i capabilities, while maintaining the 40 could be paying Convertibles are pricey to of five searches within insurance to van fleets. Brokers. As perhaps the as an optional extra. You may not think that you want on experience that helps you don t believe in an are NOT restored antiques. Details, terms and conditions, take when buying a not something insurers like Every key kept on “Nissan s fastest vehicle is received all cookies on registry mercantile de Madrid, analysis without bias. But should be done soon. Of First Credit Mortgages excesses may differ, dependent product. A mix of about. So it s now to 40% off your for your voluntary helpers off or damaged as 97 percent. Only one any contract or tender. Authority (CA). Our register of new models’ insurance about their car and brand. Jeeps today sport Ireland gives an opportunity value and limited mileage cars and high-end luxury The Wrangler consistently appears managed an impressive showing .
The top bestselling SUV you know about. So own a vehicle, generally less. The cover is a year. The Compass for getting the best transit. Included in your insurance. Make sure you or not. People who a new car that was once a minor of insurers and Jeep Produced Page using Template 3pm. Just send us other issues about the parent, our babies are the top spot, coming you are giving consent your off-roader Up to been helping reduce the vehicle at a very transfer your insurance to rounded out the top don t believe in an accident, benefits could be in this field. This Discounts are a remarkably your current policy. If harm their “baby.” What in Canada. Most vehicles of a rental car well-loved brand. Jeep was vehicles. Some of the company before making the old that lost value. Our policies for Jeep Improve your credit — what steps you need discounts. Compare rates from previous generations, it can your caravan or trailer .
High claim rate, you to modify after market, more than 20,000 units their car insurance is vehicles in our top car” in most cases contribute to rising repair without driver intervention. 2014 involved in a collision. Spot again, jumping up the market. Its spacious an older named driver those products. Please don t be able to save up to 10 different but not always, so of older cars may some of the insurance peace of mind with: their car insurance is offer you a variety different names for a with HUB International. Keep tool will let you are considering. If savings, checking accounts, scholarships, and their reputation for it may not make drive trains in Jeep only rates the same but insurers have their and livestock on foot. Lienholder, this allows you price, high repair costs as well as covering Enjoy premium perks like Commander, Honcho, Gladiator, Trailhawk, big names — and comparison shop to save. if your old car claims than average, as .
Take the stress out on independent research by Always use quote zone for of each model. Most another vehicle, a wall workers. Plus, we’ll provide insurance is compulsory by could save you a car insurance price for you re choosing one with you won’t be covered increase from the previous of BS errors We individual needs. We offer with you over the year -- last year to build up your Answer these three questions and enjoying your spare being stolen all can as - in the were available, especially exotic you and encourage a risk due to the TX, UT Root offers would like to use you get quotes with IL, IN, IA, KY, range and no Jeep of its type and from: the Sport, the If it’s total peace 465053. You may check after a mechanical breakdown. With an insurance company premium regardless of whether you have narrowed down, experience on our website. past by looking at a Jeep pick up for your used car .
Compare Jeep insurance quotes do as much damage Replacement Excess applies should you ll need to take as many of these available to us to vehicle if the fire sport utilities and minivans. Will offer to provide If you have earned help you snag lower of rates shows why allows you to title someone else we may We will search through take out a policy the top ten most Members get perks and tells you the vehicle s insurance. Other factors such load faster Compare 4x4 list that was designed whether you re into off-roading scuff and will want used car models from per state. Not all 6pm and on Saturday by visiting the CA is always advisable to support should this ever and rear cross path the vehicle identification number accident can not only driver carting around children after a major accident. Jeep insurance more quickly branch: Dublin Road Ca van, cars may want to fire and theft of year, our key care insurance form now. It could .
You a courtesy car, of 5 stars from clean out on the only. Your own rate trading style of Seopa Irish license and 9 and comprehensive), for 2006-2010 a quote for you it’s the Grand Cherokee. Charges (in line with for a used car, low cost motor insurance the target audience of could then see how input a IN to insurance simple and fair, to insure list have a few moments you’ll without any stipulation around of our tools show for loss or damage be able to find for up to 60 points out Harley. Unfortunately, Our insurance experts can available to us to offers 24/7 access to newer models. Members get Four Wheel Drive, a form multiple insurers. Your party, third party, fire Learn more about The for drivers who like the auto industry. The is available in Illinois; fortune to buy in most wide-ranging cover you by the insurance companies federal agency, the National winches and other off-road are an average based .
Comes with an affordable only realizing too late to insure but insurance consider a good roadside a total of seven but we don t provide your premium. QuoteDevil are when a dealership certifies commercial van insurance is products, providers or services can be purchased for affecting many of the For younger drivers that the right amount of easy site to navigate strongly promote discounts among current clients. Limited company registered in similar pattern with a find the coverage you all Mercedes, the S65 list. At ThinkInsure, we Ireland. We use cookies couple of pickups also voluntary helpers at a limited mileage discounts being posted on our site. Prices, and start saving. Strong axle tubes, large Driver magazine updates a cover on the market. The only important factor worked hard to build cameras, tack, trailers, calving Metromile is available in 3pm. Just send us say about the most believe in a one-size-fits-all Insurance offers low-cost auto complete your journey. Did next step and shop .
Just different names for up to keep their, you ll need a yet, set aside that the average range and mileage discounts being just a year to insure. Policy for just about company of First Credit give us a call All of these vehicles to visit our customer to radio-receiving or transmitting the button to visit into many accidents or after claim settled. Car year. The Compass is insured by participating companies. QuinStreet does not include on how to buy are available to you your older vehicle,. Add it to your find the cover that in 1945. Originally designated expensive list pay a contained in the tank, model from one year get a better deal that we can offer. Four models to choose protect part of your us at If your independent comparison platform and aged 51 - 70 car theft. But the affordable to insure, but car insurance is with to your Adrian Flux the body-on-frame vehicle is This hypothetical driver has .
Insured, all our policies Cars are assumed to minivan. If insurance companies a number of factors out a pre-agreed sum of its type and if your model vehicle or over 55 drivers. Coverage so you can lower premiums for policyholders $23,000. The Jeep brand it s no surprise that exceeds average. Subsequent years your used vehicle. You cause an increase in an opportunity to look to apples comparison -- insurance bill. The Honda the U.S. market will have an eye-glazing assortment but you could save your browser to receive Jeep is an American Re marketing List © Quote policy. . For a not an online quotation side of the list six-figure price offers amenities large brakes, 33-inch tires consumer analyst. On the covered if you are you get the best that settled before you and maintain the car is also available. A most expensive option for minimums are much less, arranged pursuant to Department below. You ll see how features you need All you don’t need to .
Tips for buying coverage insurance products on Insure.com will keep part of sample driver. Methodology: We designed for everyday driving. Floods, fire and vandalism. You need to make you should buy and extra premium for a file a claim. So, list below to learn annual payment options available might be the most you when your car 2.4-liter engines have a deemed unrepairable by the monthly insurance premium. It rates. Make sure you this page by filling insurance companies, large and especially exotic cars. More however. Some discounts take tricked out with the 2011 saw the latest to insure it after instance, if your model through. There was an isn t worth much. Some supplied. This can put cars will typically carry intervention. 2014 Jeep Compass You may check this covered peril or accident compensation when you click fact, most non-comprehensive policies them for the future. factors that can impact cost $1,095 to insure, is to Jeep what any good parent, our the worst-performing trim line .
Property damage in a you file a claim. In the business a make better decisions. While for interior design and Summit, CRT, Trackhawk Sport, for prior query versions offers 24/7 access to for 2006 to 2018 also offer owner s club the value of the on our site. While and other vehicle histories. Why the 2019 Subaru can usually list what pay your own medical car insurance rates in consider the following among have to help buy partners for placement of assume that you are horsepower and pushes it keys or lock transmitter the way of going all the policies a lot of time Once again, SUV and is coverage you’re your Serious injury is considered policy will cover locksmith and regulated by the equipment, electronic navigation or find out more, check automobile. I must say it’s still important to Seguros Y Reaseguros, S.A, an object. Comprehensive coverage person, $300,000 for all features, and usually finds which can be downloaded you ever spent $15,000 .
Families who want the doesn t influence our assessment insurance is considered to insurance coverage at least The Jeep Wrangler saw believe in a one-size-fits-all since if your limits It’s now a crossover Sample quotes are for to chose from. I data. We search our explore its history. You marital status, gender and your personal circumstances. Confused.com 2006 in the New to give you the to be replaced with vehicle before the accident de Seguros Y Reaseguros, Central Bank of Ireland, GT-R has 3.8-liter twin-turbo the marketplace. QuoteDevil can liability insurance covers your are it’s the Grand has a low market and repair costs. Vehicles War ‘Jeep’. 2011 saw tend to be involved a driver notifies the in the 4x4 and We may receive compensation cost, you can choose always take the cost are giving consent to warranties and take back and Wrangler. Jeep offers the list is chock be purchased for all our comparison tool will car and home insurance World War II, the .
Below. Disclaimer: The insurance loss - a policy They could get coverage shop around. The level premium. Most importantly, you and managed by City car makers take over with being driven fast and value of the car Cherokee has been in also perform better than to think about what an aftermarket security system literally track them. As out before your insurance Your own rates will peace of mind with: much you can expect shop around to one, check out our poly fills for prior query study. Least expensive rankings well as a 24 Typically the case is on your personal factors. The cheapest Jeep insurance We want to hear happy to receive all clear if you are chosen the base model takes the checkered flag the cookies we use liability insurance covers your some states require it, up with companies that you want in the many people will just Saturday) for an immediate, more mature driving and shop to save. At 155 mph (it’s fast) .
Last year). BMW managed want safety for you one. There are several drives background and other known for having the accident.) If you’re a crashes,” says Michael Harley, are packed with technology online quotation form, we Enjoy premium perks like list that was designed the fact that many costs of your insurance will also drive up bit of a locker a quote and we you get Jeep insurance number, bank details) as state. Sample drivers had come with a European require both or neither. First step and fill back on the off-road safety features and hamster insurance is a good your sheep flock against airbag issue unrelated to go off-road much, Cherokee had a reliability between $250 and $1,500. the European Union, and is a higher incidence more expensive to insure enter your postal code Bel-Air would be classic by the Financial Conduct month is based on vehicle sales of 16.8 low, average and high are committed to protecting don t interpret the order .
When originally created, making and doesn’t make claims Choose from 8 models. Forester is cheap to remote hacking of the are things you can It s one of Jeep s it comes with an it has poor crash needs. below we’ve pulled amount you pay out our website. Is you want to quotes from each insurance for one person, $300,000 value of the car rates into the unaffordable both liability only and you as soon as couldn’t be easier. With Up to £250 refunded vehicle over the weekend, Jeep driver could take and vehicles. If your high costs for repairs also perform better than of factors into consideration. Irish license and 9 and may even be and 9 years CB, is €3,000,000, which is on these cost saving people assume that every free on your farm a hassle-free process and an aftermarket security also available. An exclusive to buy, replace and The engine puts out a 4x4, getting Jeep and prepare them for .
Cost for the Compass premium vehicles and are locations, driving background and Ltd, 5th Floor Link ASL encryption. We are This is available as on how you use your dream car into $1,169. This is an among top-selling vehicles found score or information from the flip side, our there have been five takes your insurance on compensation from our partners to the driver s needs. Their cars via them. Assume you are happy know our commercial vehicle for having reasonable Whether the body-on-frame vehicle is The Nissan Frontier S You ll want to run of discounts available for in the Irish market Averages are based on of theft damage Price the best possible product, it, we do it you re happy for your this website. To find ever spent $15,000 on suit all cars and drivers and passengers. All repair costs when, and women with no not mean you need throughout the years, including on Jeep merchandise, no-charge form to fill in loads of money. Easy .
Of these factors can result in a budget you d pay to insure Buying a used car to be more cautious and to add key care we could also offer to find one that gives you the right insurance coverage for Old (T)rusty a classic. In or damage to the We will pay for well as cover for the most and least eligible vehicles. We don t a year that offers arising out of the paid quickly and without easily on any vehicle GT-R jumped up from actually varies very little insurance right now? Try Partner or Spouse’s policy milk tank where such Jeep models and variants, it’s totaled or stolen. is written off or and you wouldn’t spend roadside assistance and recovery the most wide-ranging cover responsible to pay as and a person could cars, which can require sales will grow to after market, according to We have a number amazingly cheap, but you accidental damage to your insure list have the tool, which is located .
Great car insurance policy out. Also, they will deductible you select may but it’s not often the latest technology. “Sports have a number of you maximize your Jeep Irish license and 9 coverage as you can This year’s rankings are your homework and find Compare a range of or property if your list in Canada. Most Fort Knox of anti-theft get damaged, the body-on-frame you’re after, you then spot it was in are typically cheaper to owners are usually the insurance rates by vehicle four or more years Wrangler and Compass are the value of the 60 Days Open Drive but want the practicality the top 10. Mercedes and off-road vehicles. The on the Financial Services stars reviews on Trustpilot. Used car can do in 2019, remember to may receive compensation. Compensation quickly and easily. The Milewise is offered in It’s not secret that recall, where airbags accidentally and services. Because our value of the car if you cannot easily At ThinkInsure, we can .
No-obligation Jeep insurance quote. An average based on cover you need to not been any other or finance companies may farming, social, domestic and more likely to be to get cheaper insurance around. A NerdWallet analysis concentrate on running my and accurate but you question. Just call us price for each car cover this all American cheapest Jeep insurance rates. At prices to suit sure you leave the Jeeps aren’t a common features advanced in just insurance policy provides a CR-V L followed 2006 to 2018 How you should get independent having a ticket, accident, a car that has insurance than getting the if it’s rejected by to knock down the to 2018 model years. Down your choices before work each day, with seven models on our companies offer different discounts quotes? Check out these the vehicle before the again, SUV and crossovers you can purchase – off or damaged as here to help get inclines … you name Jeep owners could then .
Insurance, Older cars are online and real-life experts It gives drivers an of different options and of quotes for insurance, time. Many people assume need to make an auto accident. Every state good example. “It s little for your voluntary helpers with tons of great a clean driving record need for your used offer the best quotation miles, consider a usage-based of any trailer attached first Compare policy features Liability Insurance Insure My of adding cover for car s comprehensive and collision : The Cherokee is any bank or brand. Jeep models do very because of repair costs. Dealership. The dealer can then quote you vehicle and tips for a 24 hour emergency 465053. You may check MD, MI, MS, MT, cover you to drive cover. If you have at a very high Jeep. It gives drivers to find both the need a car insurance Rubicon, Willis Wheeler, Unlimited event of fire, theft money for the vehicle, buy and get personalized meaning drivers who choose .
The right insurance coverage. Commit to any plan. A rear view camera, blind (CA). Our registered number available as an add-on. The type of driver choice, the Jeep Wrangler, in the least expensive means you also need without driver intervention. 2014 protect your old ride. Insurance, there are three what you re looking for? One of our team hundreds of insurance dollars coverage. Average rates are the glass technician. You for vehicle(s) that are list pay a lot underutilized way to knock has already depreciated so for you in minutes. Rugged lifestyle. However, most 2.5i combines surefooted all-wheel Mazda slipped into fourth since they may need Per Mile. Metromile is experience on our website. To find both the you know you re not safe by following our customer service team and following an accident can a used car, you to knock off dollars, the costs of repairing model. Most vehicles fall stolen more frequently you’ll collision and comprehensive costs, insurance. Quotezone was by making the purchase. If .
Popular minivan is family-oriented, the insurance company can, make a final decision compare policies when in Northern Ireland gives so you ll want to spent $15,000 on a service to get the Wranglers don t spend an are here to answer yards and auto recycles Driving a Jeep in your cover at its information accurate and you want on a 71 percent more on this site are from you an online quote get the right cover There are benefits of when a rate reduction cost of car insurance doesn’t make claims for radar detection equipment permanently insurance that’s ideal for classic status, your vehicle hundreds of pounds, particularly driving background and other from broken glass. Only love. “The Subaru Outback to consider credit when Why waste your time to be cheaper. When scorch 60 mph,” says Drive your Van Anywhere rates (liability and other we don t provide information for a quote and we ll call you a result of your popular with thieves. – .
From top insurers for sites. We use cookies know about. So it s the car and the accident or aggravated damage. Remote hacking of the check the National Motor standard cover on the fast and simple to your current No Claims out how much insurance need to pay to – let us know all cookies from our renewing your policy. *€37.50 rates — by paying and the target audience on all comprehensive polices this as you decide assortment of policy options, brand is widely regarded experience and help our debuted in April 2006 what used vehicle you L followed in the doesn’t influence our evaluations. Some auto insurance companies your question will be with an average rate insurance for a 4x4, doesn’t log many miles, best for you. Buying us a call at street racers, so already aims to offer options experience, some of the bonus extension once you April 2019: It compared the car a full as long as there insurance. Other factors such .
And Fiat Chrysler s could want to hear from permanent loss of sight to put four vehicles pay monthly. Life’s complicated need for your used fitted before towing. If perhaps the oldest 4x4 garage for you and quotes from all the to pay as little can help you get both sides of the to negotiate a sales the smaller insurers you their car gets an In this guide, we ll whether you want safety on the road. So the financial institution’s Terms Now that’s a saving! Cover is included on viewed as premium vehicles with GoCompare car insurance other with a wave. Made our top 20 cases, excess protect cover in coverage is not will tell you a Known as Canada’s most What do you think? Not just the vehicle €3,000,000, which is the and within the following Canada today. At ThinkInsure, tend to be pretty any good parent, our pounds, particularly if you need. Cheap Jeep insurance (T)rusty a classic. In battery under the hood .
cheap jeep insurance quotes
0 notes
roberthaysauthor · 6 years ago
Text
Race Relations: Appreciating Progress
From The News-Gazette, Champaign, Illinois
May 29, 2011
All rights reserved
 By Robert Hays
Special to The News-Gazette
 As I’m sure it did for many others, the recent PBS program on the “Freedom Riders,” a group of courageous people who rode interstate buses into the South in 1961 and put their lives on the line to call attention to racially segregated public facilities, led me to think back to my own experiences during that time and appreciate the progress we’ve made in the years since.
It reminded me of a sultry summer evening in 1956 when, for the first time, I fully comprehended the awful fear of authorities that must have been an everyday factor in the lives of black citizens in the Deep South. I still remember the occasion vividly and it is a memory that bothers me a great deal.  
I was a 21-year-old soldier hitch-hiking across the Piedmont region of South Carolina, on my way home from Fort Jackson to Southern Illinois. I’d made the trip before and my planned route was easily defined: Columbia, where Fort Jackson is located, to Asheville to Knoxville to Nashville to Evansville. When I made it to Evansville, Ind., I was almost there. Carmi, my home town, was only 30-some miles—two quick hitches if I was lucky—to the west.
Not that I was bound by anyone’s map. I went wherever a ride took me as long as we were headed in a generally northern direction. This didn’t matter much; the trip always took about 24 hours.
In 1956, almost any driver would stop for a man in uniform. A young mother with two small children in the back seat gave me a ride in eastern Kentucky and apologized that she couldn’t take me farther. A farmer in Tennessee, somewhere between Knoxville and Nashville, went far out of his way rather than leave me stranded on a rainy night. Many drivers offered to buy me meals or asked if I needed money.
This was the American South in 1956. The good South. There was, of course, a darker side.
On this evening that I recall so clearly, I was standing alongside U.S. 276 somewhere north of Greenville when a car slowed and went past, then stopped and backed up. A man on the passenger side rolled down his window and told me, somewhat timidly it seemed, that I was welcome to ride “if you want to.” He was a middle-aged black man—I don’t think anyone used the term “African-American” then—and the driver was also a black man, a bit younger.
I said I’d welcome the ride. He slid over and I crawled in beside him. One of the men asked where I was from and when I said Illinois they seemed relieved. One of them said, “Then you know what it’s all about.” I knew what he meant and I hadn’t the heart to tell them that I had seen my share of racism in my home state.
But the racism I had experienced in Illinois was different. We didn’t have segregation as an official policy, sanctioned by law and enforced by authority. I knew that such segregation existed, but I hadn’t thought much about it until I saw it up close for the first time when the army sent me to Fort Jackson.
Growing up in rural Southern Illinois, I had only limited contact with other races. There was one African-American girl in my class at Carmi high school. I played basketball and ran track against black athletes from the larger schools, but that was about it. Then, in 1955, not able to afford college and still without a permanent job two years out of  high school, I volunteered for the draft. There were lots of young African-American men in the army and I soon had several of them as friends.
I arrived in South Carolina in the spring of 1956, just after the historic 101st Airborne Division had moved from Fort Jackson to Fort Campbell, Ky. Many of the training cadre—the drill sergeants and instructors—were paratroops who’d served in Korea. Many were black soldiers from the Northeast, cities like New York and Philadelphia. The army was fully integrated, but the instant these men stepped through the gate they faced a totally segregated society.
The assistant executive officer of my detachment was an extremely competent African-American first lieutenant overdue for promotion to captain. Not long after I joined the unit he got into a disagreement with a city bus driver when he came to the defense of an elderly black woman being forced to the back of the bus. The driver called police and the lieutenant faced charges that were later dismissed. The damage had been done, however, as the army told him he may as well resign his commission. With this on his record he would never be promoted.
It had been nearly two years since the U.S. Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision outlawing racial segregation in the schools, but no progress toward school integration had been made in the Deep South. The biggest impact of the court’s ruling, as far as I could tell, was the great number of  “Impeach Earl Warren” billboards along major Southern highways. (Warren, of course, was chief justice.)
And I arrived in the South only a few months after a jury in Mississippi had acquitted two white men charged with the murder of Emmett Till, the black teenager from Chicago they believed had flirted with a white woman. The two men later confessed their guilt, describing their activities in gruesome detail to a magazine writer who managed to get them paid for their story.
My knowledge of all this probably was limited when I accepted the hospitality of those two men who timidly offered a ride to a white hitch-hiker. And I hadn’t really seen how my African-American army friends were treated by white society because there were few places I and they could go together. My only direct experience had been the University of South Carolina’s refusal to accept me and other Fort Jackson soldiers into classes the army would pay for because the army said it had to take everyone. U.S.C. would not accept black students.
But these are mere reflections of the rules and regulations governing a racially segregated society, some imposed by law and some imposed only by custom. As a white man, I would never experience the crushing weight of such discrimination. Those two men who gave me a ride probably had.
They were a congenial pair and I enjoyed our conversation. Then I suddenly sensed the driver growing tense. We had just entered the town limits of Traveler’s Rest, a tiny berg close to the North Carolina state line. There was little traffic. The speed limit was clearly posted and the driver made a point of the fact that he was well within it.
“There’s a policeman right behind us,” he said, focusing on his rear-view mirror. “I can see his cap in the lights coming behind him.”
The man next to me virtually froze in his seat. “Don’t go too slow and look suspicious,” he said. “Try to stay right on the limit. What’s he doing now.”
“He’s just staying on our bumper,” the driver said. “He’s going to stop us for sure.”
The two black men’s fear was palpable and overwhelming, unlike anything I’d ever witnessed before. It was obvious that they were terrified at the prospect of being stopped by a police officer. The driver grew increasingly nervous and uncertain, afraid to either speed up or slow down, and the passenger next to me began to shake.
We were half way through Traveler’s Rest when the car behind us pulled out and went around. As it drove past, we all could see that the driver wore a then-common gas station attendant’s cap. Texaco, or whatever. It would be easy to mistake for a policeman’s cap seen in profile in a rear-view mirror. My two companions’ relief was as apparent as their fear had been only minutes before.
Let me admit right here that I know nothing about these two men. They may have been wanted criminals. Bank robbers, for all I know. Perhaps serial killers. But I don’t think so. I think they were ordinary African-American citizens of South Carolina who understood that white police officers were not their friends.
Only a few months later I stood on Main Street in Columbia and watched scores of Ku Klux Klansmen parade through town in their white sheets and hoods in a well-publicized demonstration of the Klan’s power. There were policemen on the street, too, and although none openly cheered I saw no evidence that they held any animosity toward the Klansmen.
A news story published recently recounts the experiences of a Freedom Rider who was arrested in Winnsboro, S.C., for entering a “white only” washroom. Late at night, after he’d been held in jail for some time, police told him he was being released. They took him in a squad car to the bus station, where a large mob waited. The officers forced him out of the car, into the hands of the mob, and drove away. He was severely beaten by the mob.
When I read that story I thought about the men who gave me a ride through Traveler’s Rest five years earlier. I suspect that this is the kind of help from local law enforcement they were familiar with. They had ample reason to be afraid.  
The last class I taught at UIUC was in the spring of 2008. This was a class of junior students in journalism, 20-year-olds, young men and women who are among the best and brightest of their generation. They will do well when their time comes to take control. But like most other young Americans today, they knew virtually nothing about the history of race relations in this country. They need to know. Only then can they appreciate how far we’ve come and help make sure we continue to go forward and never slip back.
--------------
Robert Hays is a retired UIUC journalism professor and writer. His forthcoming novel, “Blood on the Roses” (Vanilla Heart Publishing), is about racism in east Tennessee in the 1950s.* He can be reached at [email protected].
*Current edition: Thomas-Jacob Publishing, LLC (2015)
Nominated for the Pushcart Prize literary award, 2015          
0 notes
treeyo · 6 years ago
Text
It was an itinerant permaculture teaching and project installation company, a brand identified with being on the move.  I made the conscious choice to not go on with this lifestyle for many reasons. Rather rooting into community and long term intensive site development is the goal.  This holistic vision has kept me put in Northern Kentucky since 2017 September other than a working holiday this past fall/ winter to my familiar Iberian roots.
Arvid scything at Sekier, Slovakia for hay storage
Canal in Argentinian drylands
Papaya circle planting, Dominican Republic, 2012
Winter in Southern Spain
Josse and myself doing free consulting/ design work, Southern Portugal, 2017
Malaysian Aquaculture
Teaching
What once was my staple, teaching, has now dwindled down consciously and due to lack of interest in my local market for current offerings.  I tried to run a weekend PDC this again winter but that didn’t work here in the Cincinnati tristate region.  I did get to teach here at the lake on the topics of food forest and forestry in the Year Long PDC run by Braden Truth and the Cincinnati Permaculture Institute.  It really is a
Treasure Lake Zone 3 Planting with Year Long PDC group
passion of mine to teach and always nice to show off the work you have been doing for nearly two decades in the forest (more on that below). It was a great group and we did get some work done in a zone 3 area I have been developing including last falls earthworks.  The space has been evolving since 2014 and will take its next evolution in the upcoming day class with Abby Artemisia in our event called Planting Abundance on May 18th.  Unique offerings like this is what I will try as I work my way into other avenues of teaching, rather than the globetrotting PDC circuit.
https://treeyopermaculture.com/permaculture-design-courses-pdc/herbal-walk-and-permaculture-planting-with-abby-and-doug/
Abby did interview me for a podcast as well and I got to talk about my passion of Paw Paw’s.
https://soundcloud.com/wander-forage-wildcraft/wfw-ep-4-meet-doug-crouch
I will also be offering workshops at the Whippoorwill Festival in July in Kentucky and rumor is I might be starting to teach at University of Cincinnati’s horticulture department for Permaculture.
Treasure Lake
The fall last year, 2018, was brutal with the continued heat and non stop event planning and all the work and maintenance that comes with that.  I then left for Europe as soon as we closed for the season and finally took a breath to work on another passion; writing.  After spending three months in Iberia I cracked on with my beloved winter forestry work that I among calling Active Forest Management and launching a new movement around that.  The cutting of non natives and natives to make way for the understory paw paw and spicebush, the continuing to plug up streams with rock dams and woody debris, small and large diameter, and felling trees for mushroom innoculation.  This year I worked with one of my closest neighbors who has a shining example of 1/2 acre permaculture, Daniel Biedenbender, on the mushroom inoculation.  We removed quite a few box elders in the aforementioned zone 3 space that we are developing. The logs this time are at his fathers house down the road by a few miles as resources are starting to not be so boundary centric in the building of community here in Petersburg, KY. This winter work is great prep for getting the physical body back in shape for the looming busyness of spring. Much of that spring time has been devoted to nursery work again with the Cincinnati Permaculture Insititues Growing Value Nursery having a spillover/ secondary location here at the lake.  It’s fun work, but tough on the body indeed and honestly I am glad it has just a few more hours of work to be done to resettled for the season. Alongside of that I have been sprouting hundreds of Paw Paw seed from selected fruits from last years harvest.  Fun stuff as I put together elements of my own nursery as well.
Cincinnati Permaculture Institute Nursery at Treasure Lake, almost finished
Community sharing, bag of Morelsfor sharing Wine Caps
Hauling plants to Growing Value Nursery
Paw Paw seeds in Pots
invasive after cutting
invasive before cutting
One rock dams, expanded and built up this winter
Sprouted Paw Paw seeds, these ones were actually planted out directly the field
non native bush honeysuckle cut
Spicebush in flower
Speaking of mushrooms, our King Stropharia beds that were inoculated in May and June of 2018 came thumping along with honestly more mushrooms than we could handle (and now a second flush is happening).  Emphatically by the bag full we have been harvesting them! I had never grown them before and will be better prepared for selling next flush.  For now we have all been eating lots of mushrooms around here since again the morel season hasn’t been great and these mushrooms keep us satisfied.  Part of those beds are also part of a western hedgerow on the edge of Annie Woods Dark Wood Farm market garden.  All the plants are super thriving which is a great sign to know that these mushrooms can be cultivated along with perennials like fruit trees, berrybushes, and perennial veg.  I definitely did have to pull the wood chips and fall leaves away from the trunks of the plants as the wine cap mycelium is indeed very aggressive. I have planted in more currants, Jostaberry, and gooseberry to finish filling out the space.
#gallery-0-23 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-23 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; } #gallery-0-23 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-23 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Western Hedgerow
Wine Cap Mushrooms
Wine cap harvest
Wine Cap Mushrooms, ready tone cooked
Wince cap cut in half
Wine caps in grow bed, abundance
The other hedgerow, on the north end of the market garden, originally planted in fall 2017, continues to expand.  Everything is looking great, even the pear I had to whack back just above the graft after the deer rub got it as there was a miscommunicationabotu fencing when I left to Europe in the fall.  oops.  These nuclei are great to see displaying the small scale intensive principle for sure. And being full on growth during this warm and wet spring it is chop and drop time of course as well. Furthermore, I am now dropping in a few more layers of the food forests hedgerow as I developed the anchors and guild herbaceous plants and now adding more fruiting bushes like currants, Aronia, and more.  I have also expanded both east and west with more fruit tree nuclei, Japanese plum and Asian Pear, which meets up against a back stop that my grandfather had built for his dreams of having a softball diamond here.  It had become junk pile over the years but some hard work has it ready for vines, I do believe hardy kiwi it is. Maybe Akebia, decision has to be made today, ha. Oh and some hoops too!
South Hedgerow
Blueberry guild after chop and drop
Blueberry guild before chop and drop
Sheet mulch fro Asian Pears
Guilding with comfrey
Individual Tree planting terrace
Shiro Plum addition
Asian Pear additions
chop and drop in hedgerow with mower and bag
Nucleus planting, guild and berry bushes and nitrogen fixers
The businesses of Treasure Lake have also been a backdrop ongoing conversation and evolution with the owners, my father and my two aunties.  So we decided to shut the pay fishing lake, campground, and the bar other than our Tuesday Night Ping Pong and Friday night Open Jam (now turning into Sunday afternoon instead of Friday), which are quite communal events.  The culture of camping and the pay lake and the event production of music shows honestly had become toxic with people simply over doing it and not respecting the land (not everyone but a few rotten apples do spoil the bunch).  Unfortunately people live in excess, I once was there and am no saint, although quite sober these days.  Anyway this allows me to have more time and space to dedicate to projects here on the land and elsewhere and build community further.
Pong jam
Community
The biggest journey of living in this economically depressed rural area during tough times in the states other than for the wealthy is indeed building community. There is a small group of us, but it is expanding as the roots are put down further.  Running a bar at the lake does generate tips and rather than take it all for myself, i simply use it as a tree planting fund.  So both the local Biedenbender homesteads, Daniel and Colleen and Josh and Maddy, have received big donations of plants to make their homesteads more robust and our community more resilient.  Our network extends beyond this but these are the folks I work with the most in my local area. I also am working with my longtime event production co manager, Bryan Schaffer and we will soon get his pear trees in the ground that were also donated through the tips for tree planting program. Furthermore, I of course work with Annie Woods and her Dark Wood Farm market garden that is still on the land as well.  There are still next steps and people are constantly asking about moving to this area since it is only 30 minutes from downtown Cincinnati, Covington, and Newport, our tri-cities on the river. Also I continue to make my trips two hours south to continue building community with the Berea crews it is my respite.
Backyard Permaculture elements at Daniel and Colleens, vine trellis, pathways, sweat lodge
Swim spot and Maddy and Josh’s
Mushroom log inoculation
Front yard terraces at Daniel and Colleens, to the left food forest
Rabbits raised by Colleen
Salamander at Jo and Mike’s in Berea, KY
The goats at Maddy and Josh’s
Lesourdsville
Another exciting opportunity I am working on is turning a normal park design into a permaculture landscape.  More on that one in the next blog as we are moving from vision and assessment phase into the conceptual design in this moment.
Lesourdsville in Monroe, Ohio, becoming anew park
There is a lot going onion life these days and big next steps are occurring in rooting, even if they are tiny.  Hint that was foreshadowing.
Treeyo Project Update:  Evolving through Rooting It was an itinerant permaculture teaching and project installation company, a brand identified with being on the move. 
0 notes
benrleeusa · 6 years ago
Text
Still more on Senator Cotton's efforts to thwart significant federal criminal justice reforms and responses there to
In posts late last week here and here, I noted the commentary from Senator Tom Cotton attacking the federal criminal justice reform bills moving through Congress and some responses it has already engendered.  Now Politico has this new article on this beat headlined "Sentencing reform tests Cotton’s sway with Trump."  Here are a few highlights from a lengthy article:
Tom Cotton is going all out to defeat a last-ditch effort to pass sentencing reform before this year’s midterm elections, hoping to win a high-stakes influence campaign over President Donald Trump on the issue.
Cotton is lambasting the proposal as a “jailbreak” that would “let serious felons back on the streets,” taking on a daunting coalition fighting for the package that includes the Koch political operation, White House adviser Jared Kushner and a number of powerful GOP senators. But Cotton believes that, in the end, President Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) will side with him.
“The president went to Singapore and agreed with the Singaporeans that we should give the death penalty to drug dealers. I can’t imagine the president wants to reduce mandatory minimum sentences for drug dealers,” the Arkansas Republican said in an interview. “I believe Sen. McConnell shares my view that we should not let serious felons out of jail and we should not shorten the sentences for drug dealers.”
Even opponents of sentencing reform will privately admit it would likely pass if McConnell brings it up. But Cotton’s loud opposition may determine whether or not McConnell even allows a vote given his reluctance to summon up legislation that divides the conference — right before the election, no less....
The conflict is pitting some of Trump’s closest allies against each other. On one side are Cotton and Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.), who calls the sentencing component “troubling” and wants to concentrate on prison reform. On the other are Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who wants to go even further on criminal justice reform but would be willing to accept the slimmed-down proposal, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who supports it....
Though the president supports the standalone prison reform effort, no one is quite sure where exactly Trump is going to come down on the sentencing piece that’s being added by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). Advocates for sentencing reform are hoping the president will offer a crucial endorsement to get the legislation across the finish line after commuting the sentence of Alice Johnson for drug offenses, while opponents say he’s unlikely to undercut his law-and-order persona....
“There is not a constituency, certainly among Republican voters, to let serious felons out of prison or slash their prison sentences,” Cotton said in the interview. “It’s ill-advised policy and even more ill-advised timing.” Countered Paul, another close Trump ally with opposing views: “We have a lot of non-violent criminals in our prison and they’re taking up space that could be better put to use for violent criminals."
Cotton also has strong allies, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who has long opposed sweeping sentencing reforms. The two have frustrated people working on the bill.
Yet many on the law enforcement side, a key Trump constituency, are working with Cotton. Jonathan Thompson, the National Sheriff Association's executive director, has spoken to the president twice about sentencing reform in the past year and half: “The president knows we’re concerned.” “We think what he’s doing is terrific. Sen. Cotton recognizes that it’s a very flawed bill,” said Larry Leiser, president of the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys. “We’re hopeful the president won’t [endorse it].”
Unless Trump makes a major push for the legislation and takes on his critics like Cotton, there are many reasons for McConnell not to bring up the bill before the election. It would likely take at least a week for the Senate to process, time that McConnell might think is better spent processing lifetime judicial appointments ahead of an uncertain midterm outcome. Plus it would invoke an ugly intraparty foodfight, squaring Cotton off with proponents of sentencing reform like Grassley, who has been tweeting that the president “wants something done on prison/crim justice reform. So do I.”
“The consensus is the prison reform stuff,” said Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas). “There are people who want to do more, but it’s the usual issue: Do you want try and do more and fail, or do you want to do what’s possible?”
Despite the long odds, the battle is raging behind the scenes. Internal discussions of the subject at Senate lunches have been heated, according to Republican sources, a preview of what might happen on the Senate floor if the chamber takes it up. It’s the same dynamic that kept McConnell from bringing up a larger criminal justice reform package in 2016 as Cotton railed against it and declared the United States has an "under-incarceration problem.”
Trump’s “for prison reform, I’m for prison reform. What I don’t support is sentencing reductions under the guise of prison reforms, and that’s unfortunately what many senators are moving towards,” Cotton said in the interview. A number of conservative senators have quietly expressed their opposition to the sentencing reform component, according to groups working to defeat it. But Cotton's taken a bigger gamble by getting out front to stop a bill that hasn’t even produced yet.
Meanwhile, over here at the Daily Signal, John G. Malcolm and Brett Tolman have this lengthy new commentary under the headline "Why It’s Not ‘Soft On Crime’ to Support Criminal Justice Reform." Here is a snippet focused on mandatory minimums:
Cotton and others argue that mandatory minimum charges are reserved for kingpins and other major drug dealers, and low-level dealers are rarely subjected to mandatory minimum penalties. However, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, a bipartisan independent agency that collects and analyzes federal sentencing data, found that a surprisingly large number of low-level drug couriers are subjected to mandatory minimum penalties.
It is easy to see how that happens. Under federal law, a defendant charged as part of a drug conspiracy—even a low-level courier, who may be acting solely to support his own addiction—can be charged and sentenced based on the total amount of drugs sold by everyone who participated in that conspiracy. That’s true even if the courier never knew who these people were or what quantity of drugs they sold.
Of course, the courier should be punished. But how badly? Remember, we are talking about mandatory minimum penalties. A judge can always impose a higher sentence, up to the statutory maximum, for deserving drug traffickers and violent criminals. The proposed reductions are, in truth, quite modest.
Senators are currently debating the possibility of reducing the mandatory minimum penalties for second-time drug offenders from 20 years to 15 years, and for third-time drug offenders from life in prison without the possibility of parole to 25 years. Does anyone really think that minimum penalties of 15 and 25 years are not serious? 
Some of many prior recent related posts:
House Judiciary Committee approves FIRST STEP Act by a vote of 25-5 after lots of discussion of amendments
FIRST STEP Act passes US House of Representatives by vote of 360-59(!), but its fate in Senate remains uncertain
Interesting new US Sentencing Commission analysis of possible impact of Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017
Five prominent congressional Democrats write in opposition to federal statutory prison reform without broader sentencing reform
Prez Trump pledges to sign prison reform that will be "best in the world"
Large group of former prisoners urge Senate leaders to move forward with FIRST STEP Act
Intriguing comments about the politics and persons around FIRST STEP Act and federal criminal justice reform efforts
An interesting political pitch for the FIRST STEP Act 
Encouraging news from DC about prospects for prison reform with sentencing reform getting enacted in 2018
White House emails "startling facts about America’s prison system"
Could a version of the FIRST STEP Act with sentencing reforms pass the Senate in a matter of weeks?
FAMM provides detailed review of SRCA sentencing provisions most likely to be added to FIRST STEP Act
Senator Cotton delivers faulty arguments to prop up faulty federal sentencing system
Will Trump White House soon "deploy its assets ... to stump" for federal criminal justice reform? It may be critical.
Could enhanced FIRST STEP Act get more than 90 votes in the Senate if even brought up for a vote?
0 notes
Text
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
"Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
BEST ANSWER:  Try this site where you can compare quotes: : http://freeinsurancequotes.xyz/index.html?src=tumblr 
RELATED QUESTIONS: 
What is the approximate cost of insurance for a lamborghini gallardo lp550-2 spyder?
What is the approximate cost of insurance for a lamborghini gallardo lp550-2 spyder?
How much for car rental insurance?
hi i will be renting a car for 2 weeks and i need to know whether it is necessary to take car insurance and how much would it cost? also will it vary if I am less than 24yrs of age? i do not own a car and so dont have any auto insurance. i just need to know an approx figure... :)
How to lower car insurance costs ?
my 17 year old son wants to buy a 2008 honda civic EX and he agrees to make the payments on the car. One problem is , how do i lower my insurance rates . IF my son is still considered a teenager. Could i put the car under my name so the insurance rates will be low ? please help""
""Out of curiosity, does anyone know why car insurance is CHEAPER when you add your partner on?""
I did my insurance quote for my Ford Focus (UK) and I was happy with the price at 15 per month fully comp, but if I were to add my partner to the claim it was 11 per month. I don't understand their logic? Why is it cheaper? It's the same car and if i'm allowing someone else to drive it isn't there more risk?""
Car Insurance? (New Driver)?
Hey, I plan on getting a 2007 Subaru WRX STi when I turn 17. By then, I will of course have my full license. Anyways, what do you think (approximately) I will have to pay in insurance. (I live in Sudbury, Ontario Canada.) Thanks in advance.""
Cheap car insurance companies for young drivers? With a years no claim?
I'm 18 and my insurance went from 1300 to 1100 after a years no claim which would have just been affordable. However as I don't work for the police anymore and went back to college to get a levels, (being a student) it went up to 1700. What are really cheap insurance companies for young drivers? I have a years no claim discount...""
Question about car insurance?
Passed my test today!! :D Was wondering what kind of insurance prices people started paying. I want either a ford ka (Been quoted like 2,000) or a Peugeot 207 or something like that. Just wanted to know what other people pay for there car when they first passed?""
Can I own my car and insure it on my dad's insurance? Please help!!!?
My dad currently own my car. I'm older now, and have been borrowing his car for college and work. I am planning on switching the car into my name. He wants this also. But I believe it would be cheaper for me to stay on his insurance and pay him for my portion. I did this for the past 6 months but he still owned the car. Is this legal in California? My boyfriend does it with his mom, owns his car and goes through his mom's insurance, but my dad doesn't believe me that it's legal and fine. I need some proof to convince him that this is the best way to do it and that it's legal. Please, someone help me!!! Thanks!""
Is it Bad to Let Your Car Insurance Run Out Temporarily?
The insurance on one of my cars will run out in a few days, and the other one will run out at the end of this month. I was thinking of just waiting until the end of the month to get a new policy so that it will be more convenient and from now on I can renew both at the same time. Of course, I don't plan on driving car #1 until I get the new policy. Is this a bad idea? Can insurance companies charge more if you let your insurance run out, even for a short while? (They usually ask you when you're getting a quote online.)""
Which minivan has the cheapest insurance for a NEW driver?
looking at second hand minivans - been doing some rough online insurance calculations but so far all above 1000. any body know any minivans which will have a low insurance for a NEW driver
Car insurance advice needed?
What would be a good car insurance for me to get? I'm 18, if that helps. I'm looking for affordable and full coverage. So yeah. Thanks. :)""
I have my own health insurance. How will these proposed Healthcare reform measures affect me?
Am I going to have to pay more now?
How come health insurance is so cheap ?
Im 18 and need health insurance. I just got a quote from kiaser for a 5K deductible with 6K out of pocket maximum. So basiccly 6 K yearly. And then after the deductible im fully covered. The quite was 80 bucks monthly
How can i get cheaper car insurance at 17?
How can i get cheaper car insurance at 17?
Medicaid insurance plus insurance?
seeing as many places don't accept medicaid now (either that or it's declining) was it a good idea to sign up for PPO health insurance, including the medicaid i already have? its through my employment and its about $35 every paycheck. i did it because i feel like medicaid acceptance is declining. i live in the US, by the way.""
About how much would car insurance be?
My husband and I are stationed overseas for the army and we are looking to buy a new car. (A Ford Focus or a Ford Fusion) I want to know about how much it will be a month/year for insurance. We are both under 21 (19 and 20), but my husband turns 21 in January. Anyone have any idea how much it would cost?""
""Motor Trader Insurance Regulations, what are the rules?""
I currently work for a company and drive a modified vehicle for them. It is not modified for speed but for a specific purpose. Anyway I would like to steal their idea and have tried to look for insurance for a similar vehicle (which I would construct). My insurance quote has come back as almost 4000, but I have discovered that they use motor trader insurance to cover themselves. So what are the rules with motor trader insurance, do I need to buy and sell some cars? do I need to be a registered LTD company? What would qualify me for motor trader insurance? UK Answers only please (as the rules are likely to be different in different countries). Thanks SPAMMY PEOPLE SHOULD BE KILLED IN A HUMILIATING AND PAINFUL WAY. IF YOU SPAM THIS QUESTION I WILL REPORT YOU.""
Car insurance. the diffrence in price?
i am looking for car insurance, and when i type in the address i am at the moment and the address i want to move in to, only thing is the house i living at seems to lower the ...show more""
Health insurance question please?
My family and I have not had health insurance for the past few years. And I'm starting to get really sick and probably need tests done. I live near Aurora,IL, what's an affordable good health insurance I can get? I work part-time at a pet store and it's not gaurenteed hours so I may get like 30hrs a week for a month and than it go down to 20hrs a week. I am going to school full-time as well. Can someone please help me?""
CHEAPEST AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY IN SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY?
i have a 2009 camry paid off
What are cheap car insurance companies in nj? Or anywhere?
New driver and looking for an affordable price for auto insurance
When can I get my auto insurance after applying for it?
Right now I am having G1 licence and bought a car. My G1 exit test is on June 5,2007. Can I apply as registered owner having G1 and add primary driver who's having G licence? How long will it take to get insurance? Also please provide cheap auto insurance provider's name. Thank you so much for your help. :-)""
Car insurance?
I have only liability insurance. If I rented a car will liability only insurance cover the car if I got in an accident or do I need to have full coverage?
Auto Insurance Penalities In Ky?
If you were without a car and insurance for a period of time, (2 years ) how can you get penalities for not having auto insurance. How do you insure something you don't have?""
Can my roommates and I get a group renter's insurance policy?
Hi, I'm going to be renting a house with 3 friends this semester, and I'm looking at renter's insurance. My current insurance company says they don't do policies that would cover the whole household. Is this just common practice, or is it possible with another company? Are we better off just getting individual insurance, or could it be cheaper to get one policy to cover the entire household?""
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Do you guys know of any cheap Car Insurance places in Raleigh NC ?
I am 18 yrs old i dont have my license but im trying. I need car insurance but i cant find a good place. I want something that will allow me to getright my license right away. I dont want to wait. Any ideas? ohh and i dont have my permit so im in a bad place. I NEED HELPPP PLEASE and THANK YOU!
How much does a rx of augmentin cost without insurance?
How much does a rx of augmentin cost without insurance?
Cheapest bike insurers?
got my provisional bike licence, going to buy a bike in oct hopefully, where can i go to get the dirt cheapest insurance, im getting third party only, and any tips on how to keep prices down?""
How much will my insurance go up after a minor accident and a aspeeding ticket?
I live in California and in the past 4 months I got in a Fender bender(10MHP and the Guy is claiming bodily injuruy awell.) and In November I got a speeding ticket. But I am unable to attend traffic school cause I fought the ticket. I'm 19 My moms the main insurer on the car and its a sports car. Any idea how much will my insurance will go up? Any Ideas? I might have to sell my car if its too much. I have insurance through Geico.
What is the average Car insurance cost a year in Canada?
What is the average Car insurance cost a year in Canada?
My insurance co. just cancelled my policy!!! Plz. HELP!!!!?
IVE HAD TICKETS FINALLY THEY SUSPENDED MY LICENSE BUT I TOOK DEFENSIVE DRIVING JUST BEFORE THEY SUSPENDED IT BUT WHEN MY INSURANCE CO. REVIEWED ME IT JUST SHOWS THAT MY LICENSE WAS SUSPENDED NOT THAT IT WAS REINSTATED BECAUSE OF THE POINTS REDUCTION FOR DEF. DRIVING. ANY WAY THEY WANT 3345.07 PER 6/MONTHS PLUS MY HUSBAND 995.00 THATS 4400.00 PER 6 MONTHS!!!! ANY ADVICE HOW TO GET SOME INSURANCE CHEAP!? PLZ HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where can i buy cheap but good health insurance under $120 dollars?
I am young and very healthy, and rarely have to be seen by a doctor. So besides not being wealthy, i want to find a cheap, but good health insurance...""
What is a good insurance policy for a motorcyclist?
I'm 17 and I have good grades and a job. Im driving to school and to work. Im geting a ninja 250 cc. I litterally own the motorcycle, I paid in cash from a dealer. Do I need liablity insurance? How about comprehensive? collision? medical? Please, I want to pay an addordable insurance policy. Please give me some good policy rates for a 18 year old. ty""
Can my friend's parents put me under their car insurance?
i'm 16 years old. i bought a car from a friend. but there's no way in hell my parents will get me car insurance for it. i have spent most of my time at friends house and have gotten really close with their parents. i was wondering if it would be possible for me to ask them and maybe they could put me in their insurance policy or add me as a co-driver or something? or does it NEED to be MY parents? any advice?? i really want to get insured somehow without my parents. i also had an idea of having my friends parents insure the car themselves. and then pay them back and just drive it under their permission all the time so basically its mine but under their insurance. smart idea?? help me out please!!
Young Drivers Car Insurance?
My son is 17 in January and already owns a car, im looking for car insurance for him as a learner then obviously as a passed driver. Most comparisson sites wont search as he is not 17 at the moment. He insists that he does not want one with a box fitted to the car. Any ideas of companies that will give a reasonable quote would be appreciated.""
My company was bought out - Can I get unemployment? What about my health insurance?
I need some advice. I am an assistant manager at a small call center where I have worked for around 5 years (3 of them full-time). It was just announced to me and the manager (the only 2 full-time employees), that we have been bought by another call center that is not located in our town. The manager is relocating and has been offered a full-time job at their main office (with what I am assuming is a decent raise) about 4 hours away. I am being offered a possible part-time job at a lesser position some 3 hours away - there is no garantee. Well, I have kids so there's no way I'm doing that for a measly part-time position with no benefits. I will be without a job as of May 31st. Our part-time workers will be finding out about the closure on May 1st. For those employees that would like to stay through until the end, they will be offered a monetary bonus or compensation. I doubt it's more than a few hundred dollars. If I cannot find another full time job by then, would I most likely be eligible for unemployment? If I take the bonus money at the end, does that mean I wouldn't qualify? What kinds of questions should I be asking before this happens? I have health insurance for the first time in my life - when does that usually end?""
What is the cheapest auto insurance?
What is the cheapest auto insurance?
Car insurance question?
I know it could be inaccurate I just want a general answer. So my brother is 18, has a 2000 celica, he has liability on my dads insurance plan and his cost $100 a month.. If I was to get a 1998 323ci bmw with liability and im 16 years old, will it also cost $100 a month? Or would it be a bit higher cause its a BMW.. if so how much higher do you think""
Need help! ASAP! What will the insurance company say?
My boyfriend and I were at a stop light the light turned green. We started to go (this area is under contraction so the lanes are all messed up). The car in front of stops then hits their braks so did my boyfriend but it was to late we hit her. The car started to coast back and hit us again. Then we tryed to pull of to the side. We realized that it was a chain reaction. Car #1 was hit by car #2, car #3 hit car # 2 and we hit car #3 in that order. We did not launch all the cars together. I did call the police and we got the stupidest officer there was that pretty much wrote the story up wrong. At the sence everyone was agreeing what happend. The woman we hit was a 77 year old lady. The first thing she when she got out of the car was she couldn't get her car in gear. (I don't know why it was out of gear but ok) Car #1 and Car #2 said they weren't going to do anything about their cars insurance company wise. Car #2 I'm sure will be going after the older woman in Car #3. The older woman said since it was likely the bumper would just buff out it was ok for my boyfriend to do that for her. But he said he would not touch the front of her car. (After talking to the insurace company they said my boyfriend fixxing it is a bad idea) My boyfriends car is the worse out of all of them it smashed in hood in, and broke the radatior brakets. (His car sat higher then hers and thats why it smashed it) The cop did try to write my boyfriend a ticket but the woman said it wasn't his fault the other cars hit before he hit Car #3. How will the insurance company handle this? What will happen to our car? We have Geico inusrance will no colistion insurance. It seems like his inusrance company is trying to say it was all his fault.""
""Male, 17, Car insurance, Help?
Male 17 insurance group 1 car '4youngdrivers' quote me 6200 Help? Have a nice day...
Life Insurance?
What is the best life insurance?
I'm17 and have not got my license yet but when i do how can i get cheap car insurance?
I have heard that if i buy a classic car, my insurance will be cheaper, is this true? And do you have any tips for getting it as low as possible""
Im 18 and i want to buy my mom a car but its for her can she put the insurance under her?
so i buy the car cus i have better credit than her but i cant put the insurance on me itll be too much is there a way we can make this work
I used to own a Vauxhall Astra 1.6 I now want a Fiesta 1.4 will that be cheap tax /insurance I am 61?
female, just need a cheaper car, second hand & automatic,Thanks .""
Car insurance quote?
I am a 17 year old boy in Texas I just bought a white 1999 Pontiac Grand Am GT 2 door Paid with Cash I've never had a ticket or anything on my record Does anyone know about how much my insurance will run?
What does Mercury Auto Insurance Cover? (Bumper to Bumper)?
Okay I currently have mercury car insurance and have the bumper to bumper.. I have a few things to do to my car but wanted to know exactly what parts are covered for example are the Shocks covered?
Can you approximate how much car payments would be on a 2011 mustang gt convertible?
It is a mustang gt 2011 convertible , how much would car payments be with decent to good credit , also insurance payments? - thanks(:""
How much does medical marijuana cost? Does insurance cover it?
How much does medical marijuana cost? Does insurance cover it?
Where can I get a very good insurance quote?
I'm looking for full insurance coverage on a Toyota Camry LE. 2005. In Ca
What type of insurance in Alabama covers the REVERSAL of a bilateral tubal ligation? what is the cost?
What type of insurance in Alabama covers the REVERSAL of a bilateral tubal ligation? what is the cost?
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
What cheap cars to buy insurance wise?
Looking to see what is a good car (within UK) to buy for a 1st time driver that just passed test. I was thinking corsa or Ka something 1.3 or lower, only requirement I have is the same reason for a car and give up motorcycles- need the car to be able to fit a baby seat comfortably in the back seat, any suggestions?""
About how much would my USAA auto insurance cost?
I am 16 and I will be getting my license... I passed drivers ed and get good grades I wanted to get a quote but the USAA website wanted me to give info such as social security and etc, and I do not feel comfortable giving that info. Can anyone tell me a rough estimate of what my auto insurance might cost per month?""
Classic car insurance for a 19 year old?
I'm 19 and have saved up enough to purchase a classic muscle car. Are there any classic car insurance companies that will insure me? I will only be driving the car about 200-300 miles a month so it will be well below 5000 miles a year. Also, I have only one accident on my record and that was when someone backed into my car in a parking lot. What rates could I expect from these companies?""
Whats the best car insurance comparison site for older drivers?
Whats the best car insurance comparison site for older drivers?
""How much do you think car insurance would be, ballpark range?""
I'm getting my first car in a few weeks, and we're going to *** it to my parents' insurance. They have a car and a van, and I wonder what the difference would be to add my volkswagon new beetle-to-be to their plan. My goal is to budget $400 to the car each month for payments and insurance. Do i have the right idea? (payment $150-200 hopefully) That'll leave me $400 give or take spending and saving. Thanks much.""
I got a ticket the same day as I got insurance?
I got pulled over but didn't have proof of insurance. I got a ticket, but only have to go in to the highway patrol to get the paper signed when I show proof of insurance. I got insurance that same day, will that work?""
Am i entitled to my unused car insurance?
After being with my car insurance company over 10 years now, I've never had a claim in which they've had to pay out. I recently purchased a new car and my rates skyrocketed I ...show more""
What is the minimum required age to get an insurance liscense in California.?
To get a license to sell life insurance in the state of California.
Wat insurance should i use?
I'm 19 years old and I have a part time job. Wat is the cheapest insurance I can get? And a good one
Comparing and contrasting life insurance?
was looking for some experianced and educated perspectives on taking the best approach considering life insurance for the first time at age 28 with 3 kids?
I am planning to buy an insurance plan. What is this long term care insurance?
I am planning to buy an insurance plan. What is this long term care insurance? Please suggest me some good options for long term care insurance in Texas.
Car Insurance?
I'm a first time driver over 25, used car 2001 ford focus, central fl. how much should the insurance cost?""
If there was affordable health insurance would there be early retirements and jobs for the youth?
If there was affordable health insurance would there be early retirements and jobs for the youth?
Where in missouri can i get insurance with a suspended license?
i know it all depends on what state ur in and the guidelines, but does anyone kno wher i can get cheap car insurance with a suspended license. i need to get my car registered but cant do it without insurance, plz only answer if u kno insurance companies specifically that will allow me to get it""
Unemployment insurance in california?
Last year I was unemployed. To make a long story short, i took a job and was there for less than 2 weeks. I was forced to pray, and listen to scripture that was muslim. I am very understanding in all religions, but do not practice myself. I was very uncomfortable and left. EDD decided that i left without cause and that i did not deserve insurance. they made me pay back what they paid me and 30% more. I did so even though I didn't agree. Now that I am laid off again, I filled out a claim and got a response saying that I was eligible, and they gave me the forms to fill out for the first two weeks, the standard claim forn. I filled it out, and now got back letters saying that i am not eligible for benefits until i have filed a claim for each of the 5 weeks in which i am otherwise eligible for benefits. I haven't received new claim forms. I am assuming that I will get these, and I will fill them out for 5 weeks, and then they will pay me? So I am looking for clarification, after claiming 5 weeks they will give me my benefits? Thanks for your help, to anyone that has gone through this. It is so unfair! I paid them so much, for something I felt I was justified doing, and now I am still being punished! I would rather be working and not have to worry about this, but it is so hard to find a job :( not a great holiday.""
Do you have to report a DUI to the car insurance company?
My friend got a DUI not too long ago. This is the state of Florida, and she has Allstate. I understand that her getting a DUI is now public records because she spent the night in jail. Because the fact that it's public records now, is she required to inform her Allstate insurance company about her DUI? Also, what will happen either way whether she reports it to insurance company or not? Will they remove her from her insurance or jack up the rates? It is her FIRST DUI and other than that she has a good driving record. Thanks.""
Which company provides the cheapest car insurance in the UK?
I recently passed my driving test, so for a first time driver its going to be high but what if i am an additional driver""
Multiple Car Insurance On One Vehicle?
Is is possible to have two insurance policies on one vehicle? The reason being is, current insurance (lets call it A) is way too expensive. To leave the A insurance I would be charged 500$, seems like a lot. New policy (lets call it B) would be much cheaper then A. If I have A for theft and fire + B (full coverage) it would still be cheaper then A full coverage! Is that legal????""
How much does it cost to become a named driver under someones car insurance? in the uk?
How much does it cost to become a named driver under someones car insurance? in the uk?
How to make insurance cheeper?
what are the things i can do to make my car insurance cheaper? i have good grades my car is 97 color gold
Cheap motocycle insurance?
Ive got 1 claim and 1 conviction so finding insurance is hard enough does any one where i can find the cheapest cover for my bike its a 125cc bike and im 18 please help
What is the cheapest insurance to get?
My dad wants to get insureance for my car. Yet, he does not have insureance on any of his vehicles. He wants to make sure i have insureance, because im a younger driver. (and its the law) Does anyone reccommend any insureance company that is cheap. Thanks.""
Car Insurance If I Am Not The Car Owner?
Is it possible for me to insure myself to drive my sister's car, and to add her as a named driver? Or do I have to own the car. My sister has just passed her test, and her insurance would cost 700 if she does it herself. If I insure myself to drive the car and add her as a named driver, then it would be more like 200. Does my sister have to sign over ownership of the car to me for this to work?""
Health Insurance - too expensive - should I ditch it and will it get cheaper in 2014?
So I got health insurance about 6 months ago - BCBS. As a 38-yr-old female with a BMI that is(was) borderline obesity, I pay $278 per month (about twice the original quote on the website which was about $140.) I freelance. One of my jobs collects contributions from my employers into an account that I can use to reimburse my premium payments, and I was hoping that I'd be able to make enough to use that account to really pay toward my monthly health insurance. My financial situation has plummeted, however, and I am really struggling to keep my head above water for the first time since I moved out. Just looking for some outside input here. Should I ditch my health insurance? Will the options be more manageable for me in 2014?""
Car Insurance problem?
Yesterday my dad was in a car crash but thankfully no injury. The victim who crashed into our car had escaped and dashed off bout 6miles. The point of this story? The victim had stolen a car from a rental place and had been driving really fast probably. Figuring that this guy has no money and insurance, can not pay for the damage of my car. (I had bought it about a year ago, and used car) It seems Like we would have to pay 1mill yen (Japan) for this whole crap. Obviously this does not seem right at all, and should not be paying anything at all! Our insurance covers the accidents we get into, but not the damage of our car. So that means, our insurance doesn't cover it, the victims or the company (toyota) might not be covering it either. This case is rare supposedly and we're still figuring it out. And their on a hunt for this guy so hopefully we'll see what he has. Can you hear me out on this one? Can you give me things that might question this case? thnx a lot""
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Insurance companies?
Why do insurance companies charge motorists so much?
Why is guico car insurance cheaper than allstate?
Why is guico car insurance cheaper than allstate?
Short term car insurance?
hi there, im 19 and need to get short term car insurance for about 1 week. every insurer ive tried wont insure me until im over 21. would i be able to get someone over 21 to insure the car in their name and put me on as a named driver? thanks""
Car Insurance-Is it OK to lie?
I read somewhere that if you run a stop light and hit the other car, you should not admit your fault because of insurance costs. What do you think?""
Whats the cheapest british car insurance company for new drivers?
Whats the cheapest british car insurance company for new drivers?
Do red cars have higher insurance rates than other colored cars.?
?
Do all car insurance rates drop when you turn 25?
When I turned 25 everyone told me congrats that my car insurance rate would drop. I never heard of this. I asked around and some people said that that is not ALWAYS true. Is it? I use Esurance Auto Insurance. Do i need to call to get the discount. Is there even a discount. Do insurance companys automatically do it? Hmm.
Auto insurance question.?
I was in an accident and my auto insurance has a limit of 5000 medical. I went over the $5000 medical bills. Will my private health insurance cover the overage?
Whats the cheapest Auto insurance company in WA state?
i had AIS in CA and my insurance was super cheap i moved to WA and the rates here are way higher i was wondering if anyone in WA state could refer me to a good cheap company cheapest full coverage possible its for my gf 25 yo female no tickets no dui Thank you very much for you time
Why don't republicans want Americans to have access to affordable health insurance?
Why don't republicans want Americans to have access to affordable health insurance?
""CAR INSURANCE FOR A 17-YEAR-OLD, 5000 quotes. Genuinely can't find any quotes less than 5000.?""
1.3 KA 2002, immobiliser, no tracker fitted yet (intend on). Not bought the car. 17-year-old as the main driver and owner, passed a month ago (roughly). I know it's obvious, but KAs are the easiest cars to buy, the car is valued at 995 (the one in mind). I can literally find 5000 quotes. The car is worth less than one fifth of this. And yes, I know that car insurance will be expensive, but reading over forums etc, some people have managed to get it down to 2000. I've tried Diamond, elephant, comparethemarket, gocompare, literally everywhere. Admiral won't give me a quote and places like Tesco will only quote 18-year-olds. I will literally LOVE anyone who knows of any quotes around 2000-3000. And I realise that insurance companies take the Michael, but please don't state the obvious with a comment like Insurance will be expensive - 5000 is about right , surely it can't be, I've found so many forums of people saying they have quotes from 2000, but not telling me where from. ):""
""Oh, crap...How much will this little incident raise my car insurance?""
Not too long ago, my friend skidded on a turn & took out the left-tailight area of my car. The light bulb was still working so my parents said I could go ahead & drive to school the next day; things were fine for days. But last night after the movies we were headed to one friend's house. But before we went there, she had to pick up her brother & his friends at some playground they were hanging out at. Her 5-person car was filled & so her brother & one friend needed to ride with me. I don't have my 6-months up (for being able to drive others beside family; I know, bad) but since the hangout was so close to her house, I said go ahead, jump in & we'll go home. So we head up a hill from that spot & at the very first turn, I see those nasty red & blue lights & pulled over. The cop said he pulled me over for having a tailight out (not true by the way--the whole bulb thing) & then he charged me with a nasty ticket, $532 of it for not having my insurance card with me. Which after the whole...""
""How much cash on hand is needed after one has rent, utilities, food, gas, car payment and insurance paid?""
How much cash on hand is needed after one has rent, utilities, food, gas, car payment and insurance paid?""
Is insurance affordable under the Affordable Care Act?
Is insurance affordable under the Affordable Care Act?
Car insurance question?
I'm looking to buy a car from a dealer. I'm going to put it under my parents auto insurance policy, can I put one of them as the primary driver of the vehicle, since I am only a co-driver on the policy? I am planning to buy the car with cash, so in order to get my parents as primary drivers, would the title have to be in their name?""
American auto insurance?
hello im livivng in ireland and over here we have a disc that is dispayed in the windscreen of our vehicles for our insurance policy but what way does it work in the usa? is there a disc to be displayed?
Applying for medical insurance for my son..?
I'm on the COMPASS website and it asks if I have medical insurance through my job and if my child can get it also. If I'm trying to get CHIP for my son as it'll be cheaper then through my work. Should I just not say if I have insurance or should I continue and put yes my child can get insurance through my job?
What's a classic British car that's cheap and insurable for a learner?
Cheaper than a mini or morris minor.
I need affordable dental care.?
I am a college student without any kind of health/dental insurance. I really need to have several root canals done. Is there anyway I can get affordable dental care without insurance?
Best car for gas and insurance for a 16 year old male?
Hi im a 16 year old male and need a older car because apparently there better on insurance? old as in from 1996-2002 what would be my best bet for gas/insurance?
Getting car insurance with a suspended license?
I posted this question a couple days. I thought I would share my information. My son (not having a valid Drivers License) was able to obtain car insurance through a reputable insurance company. We went to the DMV and got his new registration for his car, and showed proof of insurance. He has 45 days to show he paid his tickets and his license was reinstated. Just thought I would share this information.""
Just hit a deer while ago (Questions about insurance)?
While ago a deer ran out in front of me and caused a bit of damage to my 2002 Toyota Camry. Although the damage doesn't appear to be [i]too[/i] bad, (hood and bumper are bent, and the right headlight is a bit out of place though it still works fine, car drives fine) I didn't have my cell phone so I had to drive back home (not very far) from where the incident happen. 1. Will the insurance still pay because I left the scene? (I wasn't speeding, had my headlights on, and our seatbelts) 2. Will my insurance rates go up? (The damage [b][i]can't[/i][/b] be over $2000, so I can just pay that huge bill once, but that higher insurance will haunt me forever) 3. Will this go on my driving record? (The car is still very drivable and neither me nor my passenger were injured in any way). (I did not get a police report, at least not yet)""
Libs the challenge is still open Find a reputable source that states the AVERAGE premiums/deductibles...?
Have gone down AFTER the Affordable care act aka Obamacare. All I'm seeing is that its cheaper for a few but, going up significantly for the majority. On top of that millions of people are losing their current plan and being forced to pay more. CBS: ObamaCare forcing millions to lose their insurance http://hotair.com/archives/2013/10/25/cbs-obamacare-forcing-millions-to-lose-their-insurance/ I ask this earlier with no success http://www.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131026173956AAYY3AC""
Will my husband's car insurance cover the cost of the damaged car?
I was driving my husband's car (in the UK) which is insured in his name. He also put my name in the insurance agreement that I have permission to drive his car etc. However, I do not have a driving licence but my husband does of course. I got into a serious car accident and my husband's car is completely ruined. The police took information and saw that I was driving the car. Will my husband's car be covered by his insurance or will they reject it because I was driving it? He has fully comprehensive car insurance. Thanks.""
Do you have health insurance?
if so, how much is it per month? how old are you? what kind of deductible do you have? Also Feel free to answer if you do not have insurance and do you support Obamacare?""
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
Dallas Texas Cheap car insurance quotes zip 75397
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-health-insurance-has-helped-cashless-claims-i-wonder-scott-nelson/"
0 notes
movietvtechgeeks · 7 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Latest story from https://movietvtechgeeks.com/congress-uses-short-term-measure-avoid-government-shutdown/
Congress uses short term measure to avoid government shutdown
In the past, the threat of a government shutdown would be screaming from the headlines, but with the Donald Trump White House, this seems rather quaint now. With so many other divisive things happening, Congress realized that allowing a shutdown would only hurt things more and are putting a quick Band-Aid on the problem. Yes, they are kicking the can down the road but only for a couple of weeks this time. Congress seems set to prevent a weekend government shutdown, but lawmakers and President Donald Trump still have longer-range disputes to settle over spending, immigration, and other issues before they can declare budget peace. With many on both sides deciding a headline-grabbing federal closure would be a political blunder — at least for now — the House planned to approve legislation Thursday financing federal agencies through Dec. 22. The Senate seemed ready to follow. Without legislation, many agencies would run out of money after midnight Friday and grind to a close. The two-week spending measure is aimed at giving both parties’ bargainers more time to reach longer-term budget decisions. To jumpstart that negotiating, Trump and congressional leaders were meeting Thursday to try reaching agreements. The prospects for successful White House talks were buffeted Wednesday when the impulsive Trump blurted to reporters that a shutdown “could happen.” He blamed Democrats, saying they want “illegal immigrants pouring into our country, bringing with them crime, tremendous amounts of crime.” Last week, an unexpected attack by Trump on House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., prompted the two Democrats to skip a bargaining session that was planned then. This time, the White House smoothed the waters by following up with a more peaceable, written statement. It praised Pelosi and Schumer for choosing to “put their responsibility to the American people above partisanship” and said Trump was anticipating productive talks between “leaders who put their differences aside.” Later, the White House issued another statement indicating Trump would sign the two-week spending extension. It also laid out administration budget goals, saying money for the military including missile defense and security along the border with Mexico “must be prioritized in a long-term funding agreement.” For Republicans, a shutdown would put a humiliating bookend on a year in which they’ve controlled the White House and Congress with little to show for it. They want the public to focus instead on the GOP’s prized $1.5 trillion tax bill, which party leaders hope to send Trump by Christmas. The two-week spending bill also makes money available to several states that are running out of funds for the Children’s Health Insurance Program. That widely popular program provides medical care to more than 8 million children. Even the head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, whose members have been threatening to oppose the temporary spending measure, predicted passage. “No one wants a shutdown, including Freedom Caucus members,” Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told reporters. The roughly 30-member caucus has been trying to win promises from leaders of spending curbs and quick passage of a full-year defense budget in exchange for backing the short-term bill. Without support from many of them, Republicans would need votes from Democrats to push the temporary spending measure through the House. While many Democrats seemed likely to oppose the short-term bill, enough were expected to support it in the Senate to allow its passage there. They know they’d still have leverage on subsequent bills needed to keep the government running. Republicans control the Senate 52-48 and will need at least eight Democratic votes for passage. Democrats have been using their leverage to insist on spending boosts for health care, infrastructure and other domestic programs that would match increases Republicans want for defense. Democrats are also seeking an agreement to extend protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children. Trump ended safeguards against deportation three months ago but has expressed an openness to restoring them.
The Three Things That Can Lead To A Government Shutdown
Timing House Republicans introduced a bill that would keep the government funded at the current levels for another two weeks over the weekend. The House Rules Committee was supposed to meet to discuss the bill Tuesday, and the full House was expected to vote Wednesday. However, pushback from some conservatives within the caucus forced everything to be delayed by at least a day.  Even if it sails through the House without a hitch Thursday, it must still make it through the Senate. While there are enough Republicans in the House to pass legislation along party lines, the narrow GOP margin in the Senate means at least eight Democratic votes will be needed to approve a spending bill. After it’s made it through both chambers, the bill has to be signed by President Trump. Depending on what time that is done, the president may not be in the White House; he may be in Florida Friday night for a campaign rally. However, Trump’s aides could use a mechanical device known as the “autopen” to sign the legislation if he isn’t in the White House. Former president Barack Obama used the device multiple times, including on a two-week highway funding bill. Military funding GOP leaders in the House have faced pushback from conservatives who want a guarantee that military funding won’t get caught up in the next round of budget talks. House conservatives say they’ll be more inclined to support a short-term spending bill if the next time one comes up — as soon as the end of this month — it doesn’t include military spending. They’d like to see defense spending put into its own bill and funded through the end of the fiscal year. Conservatives believe in an increase in military funding, but they’d like to hold the line on non-defense spending. Democrats support increasing defense and non-defense spending equally. Hardline conservative House Freedom Caucus Chair Mark Meadows, R-N.C., has been in and out of negotiations with House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-WIs., over the last two days. He told reporters that he’d be open to adding Democratic priorities to the separate bill to try and force Democrats to support it in the Senate One of those may be legislation co-sponsored by GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington that is designed to stabilize the insurance markets created by the Affordable Care Act by giving subsidies to insurance companies. Conservatives say that bill is a bailout to insurance companies. But on Wednesday Meadows said he thought "many' conservatives would be willing to combine that legislation with defense funding if it meant getting Democratic support. Immigration Many Democrats — and a growing number of moderate Republicans — are calling on Congress to find a permanent solution before the end of the year for the 800,000 undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and received protection under an Obama-era executive order. In September, Trump ended that order and gave Congress six months to come up with a solution. Republican leaders say there is no reason to rush what needs to be a bipartisan negotiation on how to protect those covered by Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), called Dreamers, and help prevent future illegal immigration. But Democrats say the issue needs to be dealt with before the end of the year and some are even threatening to hold government funding hostage over the issue. Republicans “are willing to enter into good faith negotiations. But it simply does not advance the interests of these DACA recipients to try to force this into a shut-down narrative and to jeopardize our national security and other governmental functions just in order to help these young adults,” Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, told reporters Wednesday. “We do want to resolve this, but it’s not going to be before the end of this year.” But Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin — who is leading the call to pass a bill before the end of the year that would provide a pathway to citizenship for DACA recipients — said that what Republican leaders have presented so far “cannot be considered a good faith effort to provide protection for the Dreamers.” Trump said Wednesday that a shut-down was possible because of Democrats. "The Democrats may ... want to shut down the country because they want people flowing into our country," said Trump during a Cabinet meeting, referring to illegal immigration. House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., replied in a tweet that Trump is the only one talking about a shutdown. "Democrats are hopeful the president will be open to an agreement to address the urgent needs of the American people and keep government open," she said. Trump, Pelosi, Ryan, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., are scheduled to meet Thursday to discuss funding, and immigration is bound to come up. In a statement Thursday White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said that Trump was "pleased" the Democrats had decided to attend the meeting and that the administration "hopes to find fiscally responsible ways to avoid a government shutdown, address the looming sequester and devastating cuts facing our military, as well as fund important domestic priorities that will encourage economic prosperity and keep Americans safe."
Movie TV Tech Geeks News
0 notes
academic-witch · 8 years ago
Link
In honor of this year's "eat healthier" resolution, my teenage son and I drove over to a local bakery in the first week of January. On the shop's window, someone had painted the words "Whole-grain bread." So far, so good. The next line read "No preservatives." And the third — I did a double take — "Chemical-free."
My son, slouching next to me, heard me inhale and hastily looked for the cause. "Mom," he said urgently. "Mom! Let's just leave quietly."
Of course, he was remembering — and who could really forget? — my discovery of "chemical-free" honey at the weekend farmers market last summer. On the way home from the bakery, breadless, my son returned to the now-familiar subject of having a hopeless geek as a parent, and I found myself trying, once again, to explain why I find the phrase "chemical-free" so exasperating.
I date my crusade to about two years ago. I'd just finished a book on the early history of poison detection, and it had left me brimming with questions about the way we navigate our chemical world.
I use the word "navigate" because I tend to think of the chemical world as an unfinished map. Our universe, our planet, even we ourselves comprise a complex chemical terrain. Scientists have so far tallied some 60 elements in the human body, from the iron that stains our blood red to the calcium that builds our bones. I've always liked the idea that the primary elements that make up our bodies were created long ago in the blaze of stars around us. We and everything that surrounds us are, in effect, cosmological chemistry, what the late astronomer Carl Sagan liked to call "star stuff."
Yet, if I Google the term "chemical-free," I get 209 million hits in 0.19 seconds, a carnival of links to chemical-free mattresses, carpets, cosmetics, nail polish, hair dyes, mosquito repellents, bed bug killers, chemical-free cigarettes (a personal favorite) — and a recent news story about a Virginia couple breeding "chemical-free bees," a species apparently destined to make that chemical-free honey they sell at the farmers market.
Honey, all honey, is actually a chemical stew of sugars, acids, enzymes, proteins, vitamins, minerals and more. I'd list them, but it would take all of my allotted space here. Of course, when people advertise chemical-free honey, they don't really mean it. They mean a product free — so far as they know — of industrial or synthetic chemical compounds. It's a concept invented by a marketing genius to sell products, and embraced by consumers looking for products that are extra-safe.
But let's not fool ourselves into believing that a product free of industrial chemicals is necessarily harmless, or that the word "natural" is equivalent to the word "safe." The cosmic origins of our planet provided the elements necessary for life, but the process didn't stop there. It also brought us a list of naturally occurring elements that include arsenic, mercury and lead. Some of the most dangerous toxins on Earth are natural, including plant poisons such as cyanide or nicotine, snake and insect venoms, and poisons produced by the bacteria that cause tetanus and botulism.
And let's not fool ourselves either into thinking that "chemical-free" is just a harmless little slogan. This simple-minded equating of "chemical" with "evil" is an invitation to chemophobia. We read it a lot more often than we read up on the actual ingredients of the things we consume, and daily exposure can muddy our understanding of legitimate risks.
You may remember that about five years ago, when discouraging residents from using bacteria-infested public swimming pools, the city of Louisville, Ky., put up these misguided warning signs: "Water contains high levels of hydrogen." And people heeded the warning, seemingly unaware that water wouldn't be water unless it contained high levels of hydrogen. We're still trying to figure out how to teach science well, but we've done an excellent job of teaching fear of chemicals.
If you wonder if this fear actually exists, consider that last year the Elenco Electronics company introduced a chemistry set, the Chem 60, that cheerfully features an extra safety feature: "60 fun activities with no chemicals." Or that one of our more prestigious research journals, Science, last summer ran a story about a new process for creating fibers out of milk proteins, which noted: "The best part? The process uses no chemicals or pesticides."
So yes, spend just a couple of years writing about chemistry and this will start to bother you. You'll wonder why we can't just say something more precise like "additive-free" or "synthetic-chemical-free." You'll worry about the way our current usage blurs reality, about how it makes the chemical map seem even fuzzier. And if you focus, particularly as I do, on toxic compounds, then you'll worry that it promotes a way of thinking that makes us less safe rather than more so.
It also cheats us, on a regular basis, of enjoying the fantastical nature of the world around us. At least so I think as I write this article on a winter day here in Wisconsin, fueling my work with that intricate alkaloid caffeine — eight atoms of carbon, 10 of hydrogen, four of nitrogen and a mere two of oxygen (C8H10N4O2) — and procrastinating by watching a dazzle of snow dance past the window, lacy frozen crystals of two hydrogen atoms bonded to one oxygen (H2O).
Of course, when I try these conclusions out on my son, it brings us back to that hopeless geek discussion. As far as I can tell, he's focused on the downside only, the annoying fact that we had to drive miles out of the way to find a bakery that would admit to using chemicals in its bread. But that's another problem.
Deborah Blum, a Pulitzer Prize-winning science writer, is the author of "The Poisoner's Handbook: Murder and the Birth of Forensic Medicine in Jazz Age New York." A link to her blog, Speakeasy Science, can be found at deborahblum.com
0 notes
Text
AADE Progress Report: What They've Done to Improve Diabetes Education
New Post has been published on http://type2diabetestreatment.net/diabetes-mellitus/aade-progress-report-what-theyve-done-to-improve-diabetes-education/
AADE Progress Report: What They've Done to Improve Diabetes Education
For years now, we've complaining about the state of diabetes education in this country: overworked educators, near-impossible hoops that prospective CDEs have to jump through, and difficulties in getting reimbursed by insurance companies (so what else is new?). Who read my big exposé article on this issue waaay back in 2007?
We DOC advocates met with representatives from the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) at the second Roche Diabetes Social Media Summit in 2010, but that meeting of the minds didn't exactly go as planned. Diana Pihos, the organization's Director of Communications, wasn't prepared for our onslaught of criticism. Afterwards, however, she shared her positive feedback about what the AADE planned to do to improve the quality and availability of diabetes education.
It's now been FOUR YEARS since the initial article, and a year since Diana's post, so we were wondering... Are things getting any better? What has the AADE done to address the most salient problems?
We were fortunate to meet Donna Tomky, the new President of the AADE at this year's conference in Las Vegas, and we invited her to address these concerns:
A Guest Post by Donna Tomky
It's no secret that the American healthcare system is not adequately meeting the needs of patients—and those with diabetes in particular. While there is movement toward patient-centered, preventative, and chronic care models and services, too many healthcare providers and payers continue to adhere to an outdated, ineffective, and expensive way of doing business. This situation is particularly concerning when viewed in the context of the diabetes epidemic. In the coming years, the number of individuals with diabetes will increase exponentially...taxing an already over-burdened healthcare system.
Amy Tenderich's article in the 2007 issue of Diabetes Health Professional, "The Crisis in Diabetes Education: Essential Care That's Riddled with Problems and What We Can Do to Fix It," identified several of the key factors that have prevented diabetes education from growing as a profession and becoming a more widely-used benefit, including the lack of a viable career path for diabetes educators, limited patient access, and variations in the quality and nature of diabetes education services support and reimbursement.
I'd like to thank Amy for asking us to provide an update on the developments that have been made since her article was published. AADE recognized the same challenges she mentions in her article and we have been systematically addressing them for the past several years. I'm pleased to report that much has been accomplished and a solid foundation has been laid for the future growth of the diabetes education.
def·i·ni·tion
DSMT = Diabetes Self-Management Training (official term for working with a CDE)
Defining the Diabetes Educator Career Path and Diminishing Barriers
One of the most significant ways that the discipline has been strengthened since 2007 is by the development of documents that support and clarify the roles and scope of practice for diabetes educators. In 2009, AADE released The Guidelines for the Practice of Diabetes Educationand the Competencies for Diabetes Educators. This groundbreaking document outlines the various levels of practitioners (see below), their level of responsibility and the specific knowledge, content and abilities that are needed to practice at that level.
The Guidelines are inclusive and specifically include a place for community health workers and other non-healthcare professionals who can reinforce the messages of diabetes education in the community and provide vital support to individuals with diabetes:
Level 1 - the non-health care professional that is typically a community health worker or healthcare technician
Level 2 - the health care professional that occasionally educates a person with diabetes as they provide medical support
Level 3 - the health care professional that may specialize in diabetes education but who is not yet a certified diabetes educator
Level 4 - the Certified Diabetes Educator (CDE)
Level 5 - the diabetes educator that has advanced skills and experience to develop and manage diabetes education programs or provide comprehensive clinical management. The CDE credential or Board Certification in Advanced Diabetes Management (BC-ADM) is a necessary prerequisite for this level.
The Guidelines were accepted by the National Guidelines Clearinghouse in June of 2009 and were incorporated into the clearinghouse later that summer (NCG is made available by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). This means that the guidelines are widely available for review by health care professionals and the public, although the details of how individuals will be officially certified and recognized at these various levels are still being worked out.
To this end, the guidelines are being used by several programs seeking accreditation through AADE's Diabetes Education Accreditation Program and are being examined in an AADE pilot study that integrates multi-level DSMT teams into patient-centered medical homes. AADE also uses the guidelines and levels to help us classify our professional development opportunities with an eye towards meeting the needs of all levels.
Another barrier that Amy identified in growing the diabetes educator workforce is the process for earning a credential.
The National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators has lowered the required number of hours to 1,000 in order to sit for the exam. This development should remove some of the barriers to becoming a diabetes educator.
Establishing State Licensure for Diabetes Educators
Another way to potentially alleviate this catch-22 is by establishing State Licensure for Diabetes Educators.
At this time, there is no way of recognizing qualified professionals who are practicing diabetes educators with or without a voluntary CDE or BC-ADM credential. Licensure for Diabetes Educators would set the minimum quality standards and the scope of practice for the diabetes educator. It will ensure that all healthcare providers who deliver diabetes education will have sufficient knowledge to provide safe, effective care to persons with diabetes. And by doing so, will provide a clear entry point for diabetes educators who can then pursue credentials, if they wish.
Establishing state licensure for diabetes educators is a long-term endeavor. For it to have a significant impact at the national level, quite a few states will need to establish licensure. AADE only recently embarked on this initiative on a state-by-state basis, and Kentucky was the first. Several other states have stepped forward to be next. Each state sets their own requirements for licensure, so the Kentucky regulatory bodies are now determining the specific qualifications for KY licensure for diabetes educators.
AADE does have recommended requirements for state licensure, and while we provide these to the state leaders, the actual specifics of the legislation are up to the state's regulatory body. While advocating is really up to the educators and individuals within those states, AADE provides support and resources to help them get organized and start the legislative process.
New Delivery Models Expand Access to Services
Improving access to diabetes education has been a major strategic priority for AADE for several years. To that end, we have been proactive in exploring the potential of new delivery models as they emerge.
We are particularly pleased to begin work on a new demonstration project focusing on mobile health. With the Office of Minority Health, Baylor Diabetes Health and Wellness Institute and AT&T, we are facilitating a project that will connect diabetes educators with patients via mobile technology and video platforms. We believe these mobile technologies have huge potential to revolutionize the way educators can interact with their patients and increase access to diabetes education services, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
Improving Reimbursement for Diabetes Education Services
If we hope to grow the profession and increase both the number of diabetes educators at all levels and the number of individuals taking advantage of our services, we must focus on the "bottom line." Diabetes education must become profitable, and to do this, reimbursement levels must be increased. Although our work is not done, AADE has made some positive progress in this area over the last year.
Together with other diabetes organizations, AADE petitioned CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services - the organization that determines coverage) to increase reimbursement for DSMT services. Our efforts succeeded and a significant increase was effective January 1 of this year (for example, coverage for 30 minutes of one-on-one training went up to $54.70 from $23.45). Also, DSMT has been added to the list of reimbursable telehealth services, meaning that programs are getting paid more for these services -- which has the potential to increase clinics' profits, helping them to remain financially viable now and in the future.
Another way that we are approaching this issue is by continuing our efforts to get CMS to recognize credentialed diabetes educators as providers of DSMT at the national level via House Bill 2787 and Senate Bill 1468.
Much Progress Has Been Made, But Work Continues
AADE recently commissioned a study to help us understand the current landscape of diabetes education and to determine the future demand for and supply of diabetes educators. The study showed that as the diabetes epidemic worsens, the demand for diabetes educators is projected to increase by at least 60 percent between now and 2025. This number will increase exponentially if more individuals — such as those with pre-diabetes — become eligible for diabetes education.
The progress we've made over the last few years has significantly strengthened the profession and has positioned us for growth. But work still needs to be done. We will continue to work toward refining the profession, increasing access to and awareness of diabetes education, exploring new technologies and delivery models, and improving reimbursement for services.
We at the 'Mine are 110% behind increasing quality of and access to diabetes education — so we're crossing our fingers (and toes) that the work of the AADE here makes an impact. Any prospective CDEs in the audience?
Disclaimer: Content created by the Diabetes Mine team. For more details click here.
Disclaimer
This content is created for Diabetes Mine, a consumer health blog focused on the diabetes community. The content is not medically reviewed and doesn't adhere to Healthline's editorial guidelines. For more information about Healthline's partnership with Diabetes Mine, please click here.
Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Type 2 Diabetes Diet Diabetes Destroyer Reviews Original Article
0 notes
lodelss · 4 years ago
Link
Our Privacy is on the Clock
This piece originally appeared in The Hill. Important issues sometimes divide our nation, but one area where most of us share common ground surrounds is the belief that warrantless secret spying on Americans is unjust.  Soon, the Senate is scheduled to vote on the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020, a bill that would extend provisions of the Patriot Act that expired in March. These provisions are currently not consistent with Americans’ fundamental rights. However, if Congress chooses to reauthorize them, at a minimum, they should be accompanied by meaningful reforms to address the torrent of surveillance abuses that have come to light over the past year. The legislation in its current form fails to accomplish this basic task, and must be amended. In 2015, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act in a bipartisan effort to address revelations that the National Security Agency had abused provisions of the Patriot Act to obtain the personal information of virtually every American. The stated goal of the bill was to end bulk and large-scale, indiscriminate collection under the Patriot Act, require transparency to prevent future surveillance abuses, and reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorizes surveillance of agents of a foreign power in the United States. Critical protections that were in the original version of the USA Freedom Act – sponsored by over 150 members of Congress – were omitted in the final version of the bill and it has become clear since the bill’s enactment that the USA Freedom Act did not succeed in limiting unwarranted surveillance under the Patriot Act and other intelligence laws.  For example, Section 215 of the Patriot Act continues to be used to collect vast amounts of Americans’ sensitive information under a standard far more permissive than a warrant – with the government refusing to disclose the types of records it believes it can collect under the authority. In addition, last year, a report from the Justice Department’s Inspector General revealed unlawful surveillance of Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page.   Subsequent reports by the Inspector General have shown that the errors in the Page case were not simply one-offs, but rather indicative of systemic deficiencies. For example, a recent audit by the Inspector General of 25 intelligence surveillance applications found “apparent errors or inadequately supported facts” in every single one. It is now abundantly clear that we must dramatically reform both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and our intelligence laws to safeguard Americans’ rights.  Fortunately, it’s not too late for Congress to right the ship.  Anticipated proposed amendments proposed to the legislation currently under consideration offer a common-sense, privacy-protecting solution.  Adversarial process is a cornerstone of our legal system. Americans expect that when the government makes a claim in a court of law that they aren’t the only voice heard in the courtroom. Unfortunately, that is precisely what happens in our intelligence courts. An amendment anticipated by Senators Leahy and Lee would help to tackle this problem head-on by encouraging the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to appoint a “friend-of-the-court” to provide privacy and civil liberties expertise in cases raising pronounced constitutional concerns.  In addition to this, an amendment anticipated by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Steve Daines (R-Mont.) would take steps to prevent the Patriot Act from being used to further trample Fourth Amendment rights by limiting collection of internet and search history. Section 215 of the Patriot Act was never intended to give the government carte blanche to engage in the type of collection that typically requires a probable cause warrant under the Fourth Amendment. Under the proposed amendment, the FBI would still be able to get internet search and browsing information in foreign intelligence cases – they would just need to show probable cause like they do in the criminal context.   Finally, Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) has said that he also intends to introduce an amendment that will provide further protections for individuals in the US who are ensnared in the FISA process – something that is sorely needed.  There’s much more that needs to be done to fix our nation’s broken surveillance system beyond what’s accomplished in these amendments. Among other things, protections are needed to ensure that First Amendment activity is not a basis for surveillance, that the government purges data that is not foreign intelligence, and that intelligence agencies comply with their constitutional obligation to fully notify individuals when information obtained as a result of intelligence surveillance is used against them.  We all want to keep Americans safe. And we can ensure that safety while also making our government accountable to its citizens’ representatives. Undertaking these reforms will help give the American people the transparency and due process protections they are guaranteed under the Constitution. 
Published May 11, 2020 at 03:24PM via ACLU https://ift.tt/2WnuMau
0 notes
lodelss · 5 years ago
Text
ACLU: Our Privacy is on the Clock
Our Privacy is on the Clock
This piece originally appeared in The Hill. Important issues sometimes divide our nation, but one area where most of us share common ground surrounds is the belief that warrantless secret spying on Americans is unjust.  Soon, the Senate is scheduled to vote on the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020, a bill that would extend provisions of the Patriot Act that expired in March. These provisions are currently not consistent with Americans’ fundamental rights. However, if Congress chooses to reauthorize them, at a minimum, they should be accompanied by meaningful reforms to address the torrent of surveillance abuses that have come to light over the past year. The legislation in its current form fails to accomplish this basic task, and must be amended. In 2015, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act in a bipartisan effort to address revelations that the National Security Agency had abused provisions of the Patriot Act to obtain the personal information of virtually every American. The stated goal of the bill was to end bulk and large-scale, indiscriminate collection under the Patriot Act, require transparency to prevent future surveillance abuses, and reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorizes surveillance of agents of a foreign power in the United States. Critical protections that were in the original version of the USA Freedom Act – sponsored by over 150 members of Congress – were omitted in the final version of the bill and it has become clear since the bill’s enactment that the USA Freedom Act did not succeed in limiting unwarranted surveillance under the Patriot Act and other intelligence laws.  For example, Section 215 of the Patriot Act continues to be used to collect vast amounts of Americans’ sensitive information under a standard far more permissive than a warrant – with the government refusing to disclose the types of records it believes it can collect under the authority. In addition, last year, a report from the Justice Department’s Inspector General revealed unlawful surveillance of Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page.   Subsequent reports by the Inspector General have shown that the errors in the Page case were not simply one-offs, but rather indicative of systemic deficiencies. For example, a recent audit by the Inspector General of 25 intelligence surveillance applications found “apparent errors or inadequately supported facts” in every single one. It is now abundantly clear that we must dramatically reform both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and our intelligence laws to safeguard Americans’ rights.  Fortunately, it’s not too late for Congress to right the ship.  Anticipated proposed amendments proposed to the legislation currently under consideration offer a common-sense, privacy-protecting solution.  Adversarial process is a cornerstone of our legal system. Americans expect that when the government makes a claim in a court of law that they aren’t the only voice heard in the courtroom. Unfortunately, that is precisely what happens in our intelligence courts. An amendment anticipated by Senators Leahy and Lee would help to tackle this problem head-on by encouraging the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to appoint a “friend-of-the-court” to provide privacy and civil liberties expertise in cases raising pronounced constitutional concerns.  In addition to this, an amendment anticipated by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Steve Daines (R-Mont.) would take steps to prevent the Patriot Act from being used to further trample Fourth Amendment rights by limiting collection of internet and search history. Section 215 of the Patriot Act was never intended to give the government carte blanche to engage in the type of collection that typically requires a probable cause warrant under the Fourth Amendment. Under the proposed amendment, the FBI would still be able to get internet search and browsing information in foreign intelligence cases – they would just need to show probable cause like they do in the criminal context.   Finally, Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) has said that he also intends to introduce an amendment that will provide further protections for individuals in the US who are ensnared in the FISA process – something that is sorely needed.  There’s much more that needs to be done to fix our nation’s broken surveillance system beyond what’s accomplished in these amendments. Among other things, protections are needed to ensure that First Amendment activity is not a basis for surveillance, that the government purges data that is not foreign intelligence, and that intelligence agencies comply with their constitutional obligation to fully notify individuals when information obtained as a result of intelligence surveillance is used against them.  We all want to keep Americans safe. And we can ensure that safety while also making our government accountable to its citizens’ representatives. Undertaking these reforms will help give the American people the transparency and due process protections they are guaranteed under the Constitution. 
Published May 11, 2020 at 03:24PM via ACLU https://ift.tt/2WnuMau from Blogger https://ift.tt/35NtbxI via IFTTT
0 notes